Thank you for your video! it really cleared up my doubts about approaching supermemo in general. I find that only using supermemo and reading/extracting in it quite frustrating and unenjoyable. I thought there was a 'right way' of doing IR, i guess not! SM can be whatever you want it to be and it is quite flexible to ones likes and dislikes. If it weren't for your videos i would've never tried incremental reading, you really changed my mind about learning things. I love your videos, i think they're very genuine and they always make me think. I hope you keep uploading
Let's say there is a prefered way from Wozniak, like the ideal flow. Ans as he says, even IR doesn't need to be incremental (as interrupted linear reading for the other side of the spectrum). Some video reactions I did from James B videos is when I specificy that is not "pure" IR as per the strict definition. The best is finding the precise flow for you, which might change dynamically across time, even if some flows objectively sacrifice some performance in the long term (like the guest case), it is always subjectively optimum bacause pleasure is king. In other words, if a worflow is more optimal but is unenjoyable, long-term it will become not that optimal for you.
![Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Wednesday, Apr. 29, 2020 [Finding Black Hole Structures]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SbDzqlOLIZA/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for your video! it really cleared up my doubts about approaching supermemo in general. I find that only using supermemo and reading/extracting in it quite frustrating and unenjoyable. I thought there was a 'right way' of doing IR, i guess not! SM can be whatever you want it to be and it is quite flexible to ones likes and dislikes. If it weren't for your videos i would've never tried incremental reading, you really changed my mind about learning things. I love your videos, i think they're very genuine and they always make me think. I hope you keep uploading
Let's say there is a prefered way from Wozniak, like the ideal flow. Ans as he says, even IR doesn't need to be incremental (as interrupted linear reading for the other side of the spectrum). Some video reactions I did from James B videos is when I specificy that is not "pure" IR as per the strict definition. The best is finding the precise flow for you, which might change dynamically across time, even if some flows objectively sacrifice some performance in the long term (like the guest case), it is always subjectively optimum bacause pleasure is king. In other words, if a worflow is more optimal but is unenjoyable, long-term it will become not that optimal for you.
Thank you, what is in big part why I spend so much time sharing videos about Supermemo and Incremental Reading, despite the microscopic audience :)
Hello there. If Sir Soares is willing to share his script that automagically convert MathJax into PNG, it would be wonderful!
It is a modified version of WInston's script github.com/WinstonWantsAUserName/supermemo_latex