Qaiser Bhai, I am currently studying in Germany. One of my flatmates from Colombia was formerly a Christian and now believes in evolution. We have had several discussions on weekends where we respectfully exchange views on many topics. Alhamdulillah, I am quite educated about Islamic beliefs, but your videos are extremely helpful regarding the topic of evolution. Many thanks and Jazak Allah Khair.
میں نے اس سے قبل فیصل وڑائچ کی ایولیوشن پر سیریز دیکھی تھی اور بہت حیران تھا کہ اتنے مضبوط دلائل ہیں ارتقا سے متعلق۔ لیکن اب یہ سیریز دیکھ رہا ہوں اور اس کو تنقیدی پہلو بھی دیکھ رہا ہوں اس کی بیت ضرورت تھی مسلمان نوجوانوں کو کہ کوئی سائنس کے نام پر یا سائنس کی آڑ میں اسلام کے بارے شکوک شبہات پیدا کر کہ گمراہ نا کر سکے۔ اپ اس طرح کہ علمی سیریز بناتے رہیں تاکہ ہر کوئی سائنس اور اسلام دونوں کو سمجھ سکیں
MashAllah very informative video on evolution claims ❤❤❤❤❤ now seculars your turn please give your unnecessary arguments.... May Allah protect you Qaiser sir from all evil eyes you taught us more we learn from you more ameen 🤲.....❤❤❤
qaiser bhai i always wanted to study the evolution theory myself but because of no reading habit and low attention span i couldnt , this series cleared all my doubts one by one as i continued to watch them thank u , can you make another series on different philosophies eg marxism , socialism,stoicism .thank you
Very nice effort Raja sb. May Allah bless your with more strength to expose the reality of sociopolitical agenda taking cover of science. To make your session more authentic and scholarly rich I suggest to invite scientists/scholars/researchers to prepare and deliver sessions from this platform.
much much respect to you sir. serious issue: watching these videos is highly difficult to understand for a commoner like me. it's not that i always find it difficult to understand the philosophical depth in your points, i kinda find it intriguing and thought provoking, but this series specifically has been so difficult for me to grasp, can you please speak in more simpler terms and slowly
Best economies in the world are Islamic economies..namely…Ethiopia, Syria, Nigeria,Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan,Maldives,Pakistan,Mauritiana,Uganda,Zanzibar,Iraq,Yemen,Comoros islands etc 😂😂😂
@@Warrior_1000 no bhai these are dream countries for mslims…these are the role model for the world 😝😝😝 you should be proud of them..unfortunately Raja sahib prefers failed countries like Netherlands for citizenship instead of these wonderful countries 😝😝😝
@@Takwir5 bhai you don’t seem to like reality? I just give the facts ..I don’t use foul language or inslut anyone…why are you so scared of criticism..don’t y’all criticise all other religions,countries,moralities etc 😝😝
Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are important pollinators, but they are not the only reason for pollination. Many other insects, animals, and even wind and water contribute to pollination. Some examples include: 1. _Bumble bees_ (Bombus spp.): Also important pollinators, especially for certain crops like tomatoes and blueberries. 2. _Butterflies_ (Lepidoptera): Pollinate flowers, especially those with long, tube-shaped structures. 3. _Moths_ (Lepidoptera): Some moths, like hawk moths, are significant pollinators. 4. _Flies_ (Diptera): Flies, such as hoverflies and flower flies, pollinate various plants. 5. _Beetles_ (Coleoptera): Some beetles, like ladybugs and soldier beetles, contribute to pollination. 6. _Wasps_ (Hymenoptera): Paper wasps, yellowjackets, and mud daubers also pollinate. 7. _Hummingbirds_ (Trochilidae): Important pollinators in the Americas, especially for tubular flowers. 8. _Bats_ (Chiroptera): Some bat species pollinate cacti and agave plants. 9. _Wind_ and _water_: Some plants, like grasses and aquatic plants, are pollinated by wind or water. If honey bees were to disappear, the ecosystem would face significant challenges, but it would not collapse entirely. Other pollinators would continue to play their roles, and some plants might adapt to rely more heavily on alternative pollinators. However, the loss of honey bees would: 1. _Impact food production_: Many crops, like almonds, apples, and blueberries, rely heavily on honey bee pollination. 2. _Reduce biodiversity_: The loss of honey bees could lead to reduced plant diversity, as some plants rely on them specifically. 3. _Economic consequences_: The value of pollination services provided by honey bees is substantial, and their loss would impact agriculture and economies. It's essential to note that many pollinator species, including honey bees, face threats like habitat loss, pesticides, and climate change. Conservation efforts focus on protecting and promoting diverse pollinator populations to ensure ecosystem resilience.
The evolution of species on Earth has been shaped by millions of years of interactions, adaptations, and natural selection. The diversity of life has led to complex relationships within ecosystems, allowing them to persist and evolve. Several factors contribute to the resilience of our ecosystem: 1. *Redundancy*: Multiple species often perform similar roles, ensuring that the loss of one species doesn't catastrophically impact the ecosystem. 2. *Adaptation*: Species adapt to changing environments and circumstances, helping ecosystems adjust to shifts. 3. *Niche partitioning*: Species occupy specific niches, reducing competition and allowing diverse species to coexist. 4. *Evolutionary innovation*: New species and traits emerge, introducing novel solutions to environmental challenges. Extinct species have had significant impacts on our ecosystem, such as: 1. *Dinosaurs*: Their demise allowed mammals and birds to diversify and fill new niches. 2. *Megafauna*: The loss of large herbivores and carnivores altered vegetation patterns, nutrient cycling, and predator-prey dynamics. 3. *Passenger Pigeon*: Its extinction likely impacted seed dispersal and forest regeneration. Examples of extinction events with significant ecosystem impacts include: 1. *Permian-Triassic extinction*: The loss of marine species and coral reefs had lasting effects on ocean ecosystems. 2. *K-Pg extinction*: The demise of dinosaurs and marine species led to the rise of mammals and changes in vegetation patterns. 3. *Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction*: The loss of ammonites and other marine species altered ocean chemistry and nutrient cycling. In terms of a specific order of extinctions impacting the ecosystem, consider the following example: 1. *Loss of apex predators* (e.g., wolves, sharks): This can lead to trophic cascades, altering prey populations and ecosystem processes. 2. *Decline of pollinators* (e.g., bees, butterflies): Reduced pollination can impact plant diversity and reproduction. 3. *Disappearance of decomposers* (e.g., fungi, bacteria): Nutrient cycling and soil health can be severely impacted. These examples illustrate the complex relationships within ecosystems and the potential consequences of species extinctions.
@@OFFROADVLOGGING bro ju esa book ho js me modern way SE capitalism or modern socialism pore tasfseel SE bayan ho chuke ho.. q k mostly books me old socialism hai ju aaj Kal k socialist us SE full inkaar kr dete hai... They say no we are not that socialist.. tu ju esa book ho ju today modern socialism and capitalism vs Islamic economy system pe lekhe ho... Kia ye book esa he hai??
Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Physiology, Pathology, etc main buht sari theories inference based hein yani k data samne hota hai or unki explanation bnai jati hai jo sare data ko explain ker sake. Esy to phr buht sari science ko deny kia ja skta hai yehi argument de ker.
Dekhein. Koi b hypothesis theory tab banti hai jab usko generally acceptance milti hai across the academic system. Ab jab science ki boundary hi philosophical naturalism hai . Tu aap kabi b meta physics ko beech mein ni lheingy. Ab physicists ko data mila big bang unun ne koi Kahani fit kar di. Hum ne kaha GOD hai. Aur GOD ko explain Karne ky liye Hum jyeingy philosophy of science mein . Wo kehte khud se big bang ho gya. Because philosophy of science mein ja kar wo khud phas jaate hyn. Aur theories isliye theories ky unka scientific framework hai hi ". PHILOSOPHICAL NATURALISM".
Sir baat to apki theek hai. Lkn kbhi kbhi yeh kaha jata hai k chemistry me jo reaction mechanism hai wo bhi ksi ne nhi dekha . Bus reaction mixture ka data hamare paas hota hai to hum us k hisaab se different mechanism pesh krte hain aur jo mechanism chem k laws k bilkul mutabiq aur reasonable hota hai usse accept kr liya jata hai. To swal hota hai k fossil record ko dekh kr ek mechanism suggest kiya gya hai jiss ko duniya k bare bare biologists maante hain aur isme koi biological flaw b nhi to phir evolution k khilaf hi kyu? Chem k reaction mechanism ko bhi nhi manna chahiye. Sir iska kya jwab hoga?
Chemistry ky chemical reaction ap aur mein lab mein ja kar check kar sakte hyn. . fossils ko kese check krein gy. Ky million of years mein evolve ho kar koi aur species ban gayi? Chemistry ko is se compare ni kar sakte. Chemistry ky laws Baar Baar experimentation se bane hyn. Evolutionary biology ky experiments ap kar hi ni sakte. I m talking about macro evolution
Bhai ap argument nahi samjhe reaction ki nahi uske mechanism ki baat ho rhi hai uska to direct evidence ye hoga ke koi ek ek atom ya molecule ko apni ankho se dekhy or jesy jesy wo react ker rhy hein wo note ker le lekin esa to hota ni hai mechanism predict e kiye jaty hein @@purposeoflife47
@@QamarulHassan-hu9hn mechanism is based on basic chemical reactions. In biology even we know that it's based on genes , cells , DNA etc. But we don't know exactly how genes dna and cells behave and predict their behavior. But in chemistry we know a lot more of the basis of mechanism. So it's more accurate approximation. Lets take example of physics. We have laws of physics and we can predict the big events via physics right. But we can test physics laws right now. Not the theories but laws. Then we predict the big bang in the past and black hole without experiencing. Still we can't reconcile quantum physics and general relativity. Same is not true for evolutionary biology. It's basis about cell DNA and animo acid , genes. We know very little about them. Let alone we make laws and predict
@@purposeoflife47 evolutionary biology is the only science based explanation of the biodiversity we have on the planet. There are some gaps and limitations and unsolved problems but this doesn't mean that the whole enterprise is wrong, and a lot of other fields of science have similar problems and limitations. If we are to apply the same principle of direct evidence on each and every theory of science then we will be left with a very little of scientific explanations. The question arises why don't you have the same attitude for other scientific ideas. Why arent you rejecting them (let's say for example the theories in cosmology, general relativity, theories in human physiology, pathophysiological explanations of different diseases, etc.) If the alternative of denying the evolutionary sciences is that you are agnostic about this topic (meaning that you admit, you don't know how did all these life forms came into being) then it makes sense, but if your alternate explanation is 'special creation' then you are either an ignorant or a hypocrite. Because you are denying a scientific explanation on the basis that it doesn't give you enough evidence while on the other hand you are believing in a claim for which you literally have no scientific evidence.
@@purposeoflife47 Evolutionary biology is the only scientific explanation of all the biodiversity we have on the planet Earth. There are some gaps, limitations and unanswered questions but this doesn't mean that the whole idea is wrong . A few objections and a bunch of scientific papers pointing out its limitations do not render a scientific theory untrue. A lot of other fields of science work on the same ground that you have data and then you come up with a theory that explains the whole data in the best possible way. There are many examples in the fields of astronomy, cosmology, quantum physics, physiology, pathology. The question arises why don't you have the same attitude towards other scientific theories. If we are to reject a theory just because it doesn't have any direct/independent evidence we won't be left with a lot of scientific theories. Lastly if after rejecting evolution on whatever premises, you take an agnostic stance in this matter (meaning that you admit, you don't know exactly how did all the life forms on planet earth come into being) then it makes sense but if your alternate understanding is 'special creation' then you have no logical ground to challenge the evolutionary biology because on one hand you are rejecting a scientific theory on the basis that it doesn't provide enough evidence while on the other hand you believe in an idea that literally has no scientific evidence.
The genetic thing isn't a problem.. because it doesn't rely exclusively on similarities. It is also supported by things like predicted differences, as endogenous retroviral sequences, and chromosomal fusions.. like the chromosomal fusion event of human chromosome #2 in humans...
Aap keh rahe hai hare paas data hai jisme evolutionary theory fit kiye huve hai tho aap ke aap bhe tho sirf data hi hai religion ka aap God ko independently kaise sabit karenge
World come from nothing existence of Rasooloollah his prediction about mangol that we will fight with them Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The Hour will not be established till you fight with the Khudh and the Kirman from among the non-Arabs. They will be of red faces, flat noses and small eyes; their faces will look like flat shields, and their shoes will be of hair. And you can read prophecies from hadees pdf online
@@gamingseries2914 how the perfect world come from existence without nothing And it is ok bro even people of prophet time seen the miracle but they didn't believe in prophet
@@gamingseries2914 that's the problem we didn't claim that he come from somewhere we say he is eternal he was their when no one was their People of science usually take reference as time but time was not their Allah created time
I am Muslim and Quran talks about evolution and surah sajda verses 7 to 9 and surah nooh a.s verse 9. evolution is present but not blindly or unguided or randomly independently. Either one cell is development into all or every organism is developed independently. Both options are present and accepting any option does not deny the existence of God.
Tu thik keh Ra hay Bhai Among scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 98% say they believe humans evolved over time Ye hutya hn
1. The basis of evolution is not only phenotypic similarity. 2. Ecosystems DO change and evolve independant of its inhabitants (volcanic eruptions, continental drift, tsunamis, earthquakes, meteorite impacts, etc.) 3. The relation between honeybees and angiospermic plants is that of coevolution. Sorry to say, your arguements are silly at best or deliberately misguided at worst.
Yeah the word was random here evolution is just a theory like everything else it doesn't account for everything and has its own counter theories as well don't take it as a fact
To have a relationship between there should be mind behind of it. Why is there no other insect like honeybee??? Even evolution is true how can you prove that it is unguided and blinded and independently?????
@@Thinking-beyond That is a very interesting point indeed. While honey bees themselves have multiple species, there aren't other genera or unrelated animals exactly like them. Hornets and wasps are similar in that they too are social and form hives but don't collect honey. Could this be because honeybees have a monopoly over this niche? Maybe, maybe this has some other explanation. I never said that we fully understand how life works on our planet. This is an ongoing study and evolution is one of the many building blocks.
میں نے اس سے قبل فیصل وڑائچ کی ایولیوشن پر سیریز دیکھی تھی اور بہت حیران تھا کہ اتنے مضبوط دلائل ہیں ارتقا سے متعلق۔ لیکن اب یہ سیریز دیکھ رہا ہوں اور اس کو تنقیدی پہلو بھی دیکھ رہا ہوں اس کی بیت ضرورت تھی مسلمان نوجوانوں کو کہ کوئی سائنس کے نام پر یا سائنس کی آڑ میں اسلام کے بارے شکوک شبہات پیدا کر کہ گمراہ نا کر سکے۔ اپ اس طرح کہ علمی سیریز بناتے رہیں تاکہ ہر کوئی سائنس اور اسلام دونوں کو سمجھ سکیں
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Missing Everything [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dTYeMZGzOzw/mqdefault.jpg)
Qaiser Bhai, I am currently studying in Germany. One of my flatmates from Colombia was formerly a Christian and now believes in evolution. We have had several discussions on weekends where we respectfully exchange views on many topics. Alhamdulillah, I am quite educated about Islamic beliefs, but your videos are extremely helpful regarding the topic of evolution. Many thanks and Jazak Allah Khair.
May Allah help you in your vision especially the project of "The Revivalists"
میں نے اس سے قبل فیصل وڑائچ کی ایولیوشن پر سیریز دیکھی تھی اور بہت حیران تھا کہ اتنے مضبوط دلائل ہیں ارتقا سے متعلق۔ لیکن اب یہ سیریز دیکھ رہا ہوں اور اس کو تنقیدی پہلو بھی دیکھ رہا ہوں اس کی بیت ضرورت تھی مسلمان نوجوانوں کو کہ کوئی سائنس کے نام پر یا سائنس کی آڑ میں اسلام کے بارے شکوک شبہات پیدا کر کہ گمراہ نا کر سکے۔ اپ اس طرح کہ علمی سیریز بناتے رہیں تاکہ ہر کوئی سائنس اور اسلام دونوں کو سمجھ سکیں
Correct same here
♥️ Jazak ♥️ Allah ♥️ khairun ♥️ Qaiser ♥️ Bhai ♥️ may ♥️ Allah ♥️ SWT ♥️ bless ♥️ you ♥️ and ♥️ your ♥️ family ♥️ Ameen ♥️
بہترین قیصر بھائی بہترین
MashaAllah. Behtreen arguments
جزاک اللّٰہ
Masha Allah, Bahut Behtareen
Jazak Allah Khair
Your way of Explanation is Brilliant ❤ Sir!
جزاکم اللہ خیرا
Masha Allah ❤
بہت خوب
Very informative 🎉
Thank you for this series
Mashallah bahot behtareen explains..
MASHA ALLAH ❤❤❤ ZABARDAST ANALYSIS WELL DONE 👍
The Last One Argument Was Awesome.
Keep continuing the series sir.
MashAllah very informative video on evolution claims ❤❤❤❤❤ now seculars your turn please give your unnecessary arguments.... May Allah protect you Qaiser sir from all evil eyes you taught us more we learn from you more ameen 🤲.....❤❤❤
qaiser bhai i always wanted to study the evolution theory myself but because of no reading habit and low attention span i couldnt , this series cleared all my doubts one by one as i continued to watch them thank u , can you make another series on different philosophies eg marxism , socialism,stoicism .thank you
MashaAllah
Yours is a powerful argument. It would be more powerful if you quote the source(s) of the data you use for your argument. You're doing a great job.
Assalamualaikum QAR Sir
Please Uploaded video Back to Back of this series 🙏......
We are debating on this topic in my clg...........
Thanks 😊👍
Thanks ALot
aapka video editing laajawab hai
Ma Sha Allah ❤❤❤
Very nice effort Raja sb. May Allah bless your with more strength to expose the reality of sociopolitical agenda taking cover of science. To make your session more authentic and scholarly rich I suggest to invite scientists/scholars/researchers to prepare and deliver sessions from this platform.
well explanation as usual❤
Masha Allah
much much respect to you sir. serious issue: watching these videos is highly difficult to understand for a commoner like me. it's not that i always find it difficult to understand the philosophical depth in your points, i kinda find it intriguing and thought provoking, but this series specifically has been so difficult for me to grasp, can you please speak in more simpler terms and slowly
Sir I am eagerly waiting for your videos on Islamic Economy. Kindly start that series parallel to this if possible. 😊
Best economies in the world are Islamic economies..namely…Ethiopia, Syria, Nigeria,Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan,Maldives,Pakistan,Mauritiana,Uganda,Zanzibar,Iraq,Yemen,Comoros islands etc 😂😂😂
@@Hitchens-k9s u vil give an account of insulting on the basis of religion..
@@Hitchens-k9s Obsession eh......had my ex been as obsessed as you are with this channel I would've done everything for her . 😉
@@Warrior_1000 no bhai these are dream countries for mslims…these are the role model for the world 😝😝😝 you should be proud of them..unfortunately Raja sahib prefers failed countries like Netherlands for citizenship instead of these wonderful countries 😝😝😝
@@Takwir5 bhai you don’t seem to like reality? I just give the facts ..I don’t use foul language or inslut anyone…why are you so scared of criticism..don’t y’all criticise all other religions,countries,moralities etc 😝😝
❤❤❤ mashallah sir nice 👍 work ❤❤❤
Shukriya bhai
Allah Aapko Jaza de
Video Quality agar behtar ho jaye to ??
Engineer yahan pe Comment nhi kare ga "Execllent Analysis" lekin "Uzma Rumi" ki video pe kare ga 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Mashallah ♥️
ماشاءالله ماشاءالله
🥰🥰
wa Kul jaa al haq wa zahk ul batil in al batila kana zahooqa.(Al-quran)
Awais iqbal crying in the corner
Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are important pollinators, but they are not the only reason for pollination. Many other insects, animals, and even wind and water contribute to pollination. Some examples include:
1. _Bumble bees_ (Bombus spp.): Also important pollinators, especially for certain crops like tomatoes and blueberries.
2. _Butterflies_ (Lepidoptera): Pollinate flowers, especially those with long, tube-shaped structures.
3. _Moths_ (Lepidoptera): Some moths, like hawk moths, are significant pollinators.
4. _Flies_ (Diptera): Flies, such as hoverflies and flower flies, pollinate various plants.
5. _Beetles_ (Coleoptera): Some beetles, like ladybugs and soldier beetles, contribute to pollination.
6. _Wasps_ (Hymenoptera): Paper wasps, yellowjackets, and mud daubers also pollinate.
7. _Hummingbirds_ (Trochilidae): Important pollinators in the Americas, especially for tubular flowers.
8. _Bats_ (Chiroptera): Some bat species pollinate cacti and agave plants.
9. _Wind_ and _water_: Some plants, like grasses and aquatic plants, are pollinated by wind or water.
If honey bees were to disappear, the ecosystem would face significant challenges, but it would not collapse entirely. Other pollinators would continue to play their roles, and some plants might adapt to rely more heavily on alternative pollinators. However, the loss of honey bees would:
1. _Impact food production_: Many crops, like almonds, apples, and blueberries, rely heavily on honey bee pollination.
2. _Reduce biodiversity_: The loss of honey bees could lead to reduced plant diversity, as some plants rely on them specifically.
3. _Economic consequences_: The value of pollination services provided by honey bees is substantial, and their loss would impact agriculture and economies.
It's essential to note that many pollinator species, including honey bees, face threats like habitat loss, pesticides, and climate change. Conservation efforts focus on protecting and promoting diverse pollinator populations to ensure ecosystem resilience.
The evolution of species on Earth has been shaped by millions of years of interactions, adaptations, and natural selection. The diversity of life has led to complex relationships within ecosystems, allowing them to persist and evolve. Several factors contribute to the resilience of our ecosystem:
1. *Redundancy*: Multiple species often perform similar roles, ensuring that the loss of one species doesn't catastrophically impact the ecosystem.
2. *Adaptation*: Species adapt to changing environments and circumstances, helping ecosystems adjust to shifts.
3. *Niche partitioning*: Species occupy specific niches, reducing competition and allowing diverse species to coexist.
4. *Evolutionary innovation*: New species and traits emerge, introducing novel solutions to environmental challenges.
Extinct species have had significant impacts on our ecosystem, such as:
1. *Dinosaurs*: Their demise allowed mammals and birds to diversify and fill new niches.
2. *Megafauna*: The loss of large herbivores and carnivores altered vegetation patterns, nutrient cycling, and predator-prey dynamics.
3. *Passenger Pigeon*: Its extinction likely impacted seed dispersal and forest regeneration.
Examples of extinction events with significant ecosystem impacts include:
1. *Permian-Triassic extinction*: The loss of marine species and coral reefs had lasting effects on ocean ecosystems.
2. *K-Pg extinction*: The demise of dinosaurs and marine species led to the rise of mammals and changes in vegetation patterns.
3. *Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction*: The loss of ammonites and other marine species altered ocean chemistry and nutrient cycling.
In terms of a specific order of extinctions impacting the ecosystem, consider the following example:
1. *Loss of apex predators* (e.g., wolves, sharks): This can lead to trophic cascades, altering prey populations and ecosystem processes.
2. *Decline of pollinators* (e.g., bees, butterflies): Reduced pollination can impact plant diversity and reproduction.
3. *Disappearance of decomposers* (e.g., fungi, bacteria): Nutrient cycling and soil health can be severely impacted.
These examples illustrate the complex relationships within ecosystems and the potential consequences of species extinctions.
Believe me, those who are learning from QAR don't have the capability nor willingness to understand your points ...😂
@@khayalie_pulao why don't you enter a debate with qar and educate us.
@@khayalie_pulao seekho with qaiser Ahmad raja 😂😂😂😂😂
@@purposeoflife47 Meri jaan already he has done debates and lost all of them but you don't have balls to accept it
👌👍
Sir eagerly waiting for the video of Islamic vs capitalism and socialism economic system ..❤❤
Bro read mufti taqi usmani sab book of Islam aur jadeed mahishiyaat.
@@OFFROADVLOGGING bro ju esa book ho js me modern way SE capitalism or modern socialism pore tasfseel SE bayan ho chuke ho.. q k mostly books me old socialism hai ju aaj Kal k socialist us SE full inkaar kr dete hai... They say no we are not that socialist.. tu ju esa book ho ju today modern socialism and capitalism vs Islamic economy system pe lekhe ho... Kia ye book esa he hai??
Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Physiology, Pathology, etc main buht sari theories inference based hein yani k data samne hota hai or unki explanation bnai jati hai jo sare data ko explain ker sake. Esy to phr buht sari science ko deny kia ja skta hai yehi argument de ker.
Dekhein. Koi b hypothesis theory tab banti hai jab usko generally acceptance milti hai across the academic system.
Ab jab science ki boundary hi philosophical naturalism hai . Tu aap kabi b meta physics ko beech mein ni lheingy.
Ab physicists ko data mila big bang unun ne koi Kahani fit kar di.
Hum ne kaha GOD hai. Aur GOD ko explain Karne ky liye Hum jyeingy philosophy of science mein . Wo kehte khud se big bang ho gya. Because philosophy of science mein ja kar wo khud phas jaate hyn.
Aur theories isliye theories ky unka scientific framework hai hi ". PHILOSOPHICAL NATURALISM".
QAR 💎
Sir baat to apki theek hai. Lkn kbhi kbhi yeh kaha jata hai k chemistry me jo reaction mechanism hai wo bhi ksi ne nhi dekha . Bus reaction mixture ka data hamare paas hota hai to hum us k hisaab se different mechanism pesh krte hain aur jo mechanism chem k laws k bilkul mutabiq aur reasonable hota hai usse accept kr liya jata hai. To swal hota hai k fossil record ko dekh kr ek mechanism suggest kiya gya hai jiss ko duniya k bare bare biologists maante hain aur isme koi biological flaw b nhi to phir evolution k khilaf hi kyu? Chem k reaction mechanism ko bhi nhi manna chahiye. Sir iska kya jwab hoga?
Chemistry ky chemical reaction ap aur mein lab mein ja kar check kar sakte hyn. . fossils ko kese check krein gy. Ky million of years mein evolve ho kar koi aur species ban gayi?
Chemistry ko is se compare ni kar sakte. Chemistry ky laws Baar Baar experimentation se bane hyn. Evolutionary biology ky experiments ap kar hi ni sakte. I m talking about macro evolution
Bhai ap argument nahi samjhe reaction ki nahi uske mechanism ki baat ho rhi hai uska to direct evidence ye hoga ke koi ek ek atom ya molecule ko apni ankho se dekhy or jesy jesy wo react ker rhy hein wo note ker le lekin esa to hota ni hai mechanism predict e kiye jaty hein @@purposeoflife47
@@QamarulHassan-hu9hn mechanism is based on basic chemical reactions.
In biology even we know that it's based on genes , cells , DNA etc.
But we don't know exactly how genes dna and cells behave and predict their behavior.
But in chemistry we know a lot more of the basis of mechanism. So it's more accurate approximation.
Lets take example of physics.
We have laws of physics and we can predict the big events via physics right.
But we can test physics laws right now. Not the theories but laws.
Then we predict the big bang in the past and black hole without experiencing.
Still we can't reconcile quantum physics and general relativity.
Same is not true for evolutionary biology.
It's basis about cell DNA and animo acid , genes. We know very little about them. Let alone we make laws and predict
@@purposeoflife47 evolutionary biology is the only science based explanation of the biodiversity we have on the planet. There are some gaps and limitations and unsolved problems but this doesn't mean that the whole enterprise is wrong, and a lot of other fields of science have similar problems and limitations. If we are to apply the same principle of direct evidence on each and every theory of science then we will be left with a very little of scientific explanations. The question arises why don't you have the same attitude for other scientific ideas. Why arent you rejecting them (let's say for example the theories in cosmology, general relativity, theories in human physiology, pathophysiological explanations of different diseases, etc.)
If the alternative of denying the evolutionary sciences is that you are agnostic about this topic (meaning that you admit, you don't know how did all these life forms came into being) then it makes sense, but if your alternate explanation is 'special creation' then you are either an ignorant or a hypocrite. Because you are denying a scientific explanation on the basis that it doesn't give you enough evidence while on the other hand you are believing in a claim for which you literally have no scientific evidence.
@@purposeoflife47 Evolutionary biology is the only scientific explanation of all the biodiversity we have on the planet Earth. There are some gaps, limitations and unanswered questions but this doesn't mean that the whole idea is wrong . A few objections and a bunch of scientific papers pointing out its limitations do not render a scientific theory untrue.
A lot of other fields of science work on the same ground that you have data and then you come up with a theory that explains the whole data in the best possible way. There are many examples in the fields of astronomy, cosmology, quantum physics, physiology, pathology. The question arises why don't you have the same attitude towards other scientific theories. If we are to reject a theory just because it doesn't have any direct/independent evidence we won't be left with a lot of scientific theories.
Lastly if after rejecting evolution on whatever premises, you take an agnostic stance in this matter (meaning that you admit, you don't know exactly how did all the life forms on planet earth come into being) then it makes sense but if your alternate understanding is 'special creation' then you have no logical ground to challenge the evolutionary biology because on one hand you are rejecting a scientific theory on the basis that it doesn't provide enough evidence while on the other hand you believe in an idea that literally has no scientific evidence.
😊😊
Molvio ka front man
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
👍👍👍👍
❤❤❤
Aap me ek video me kaha Har vestigial organ ka function science discover Kar chuke hai tho male me mammary gland ka kya function hai
❤
❤️❤️❤️🌹🌹🌹🤲🤲🤲
Allah ho akbar
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Next episode????
The genetic thing isn't a problem.. because it doesn't rely exclusively on similarities.
It is also supported by things like predicted differences, as endogenous retroviral sequences, and chromosomal fusions.. like the chromosomal fusion event of human chromosome #2 in humans...
The qaiser- Biggest nightmare of desi darwinist....
Why not publish your studies-against evolution, and receive your noble prize in "Biology" 🙂
FREE FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸
Awaaz boht sahi nahi he aidio ki😮
Sir, can I translate it in Bangla for my people's. I am from Bangladesh.❤
Aap keh rahe hai hare paas data hai jisme evolutionary theory fit kiye huve hai tho aap ke aap bhe tho sirf data hi hai religion ka aap God ko independently kaise sabit karenge
Why don't you write your findings and collect your noble prize
It is just like munafiq give prize to momin never
Present your argument your emotional statements
Mere ek saval Hai aap kise bhe tariqe se existence of god ko prove kijiye
World come from nothing existence of Rasooloollah his prediction about mangol that we will fight with them
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The Hour will not be established till you fight with the Khudh and the Kirman from among the non-Arabs. They will be of red faces, flat noses and small eyes; their faces will look like flat shields, and their shoes will be of hair.
And you can read prophecies from hadees pdf online
@@Converted_Muslim irrelevant to my question
@@gamingseries2914 how the perfect world come from existence without nothing
And it is ok bro even people of prophet time seen the miracle but they didn't believe in prophet
@@Converted_Muslim if something can't from nothing then how God comes from nothing
@@gamingseries2914 that's the problem we didn't claim that he come from somewhere we say he is eternal he was their when no one was their
People of science usually take reference as time but time was not their Allah created time
RI Hell Desi Mulhideen😂
Allam mian na Quran ma kaha batya ha evolution ka, ya Batana Bhool gya ?
I am Muslim and Quran talks about evolution and surah sajda verses 7 to 9 and surah nooh a.s verse 9. evolution is present but not blindly or unguided or randomly independently. Either one cell is development into all or every organism is developed independently. Both options are present and accepting any option does not deny the existence of God.
اسلام علیکم
میری سر سے گزرش کہ یہ سلسلہ روکنا نہیں چاہئے ❤❤❤
i think evolution theory is philosophical not scientific .
😂
Tu thik keh Ra hay Bhai
Among scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 98% say they believe humans evolved over time
Ye hutya hn
Ab janab biology padhane lage😂😂
1. The basis of evolution is not only phenotypic similarity.
2. Ecosystems DO change and evolve independant of its inhabitants (volcanic eruptions, continental drift, tsunamis, earthquakes, meteorite impacts, etc.)
3. The relation between honeybees and angiospermic plants is that of coevolution.
Sorry to say, your arguements are silly at best or deliberately misguided at worst.
True, this guy is just a pseudo intellectual.
Yeah the word was random here evolution is just a theory like everything else it doesn't account for everything and has its own counter theories as well don't take it as a fact
@@retrogamingfrenzy2373 that was not my point. My point was that he mistakenly or deliberately misquoted facts.
To have a relationship between there should be mind behind of it. Why is there no other insect like honeybee??? Even evolution is true how can you prove that it is unguided and blinded and independently?????
@@Thinking-beyond That is a very interesting point indeed. While honey bees themselves have multiple species, there aren't other genera or unrelated animals exactly like them. Hornets and wasps are similar in that they too are social and form hives but don't collect honey. Could this be because honeybees have a monopoly over this niche? Maybe, maybe this has some other explanation. I never said that we fully understand how life works on our planet. This is an ongoing study and evolution is one of the many building blocks.
Phd geology qaiser ahmad baaja
Nonsensical explanation of evolution by QAR
Then plz sensational explanation ap kr dain...
Ya phir surf entertainment he Apka kam ha
Then plz sensational explanation ap kr dain...
Ya phir surf entertainment he Apka kam ha
@@user-jw2bk1ny3m Sensible explanation kisi "Biologist" ki book phar kar loo......... ye kam biologist ka ha.
@@Member_of_MENSA
میں خود بیالوجی والا ہوں
میں نے اس سے قبل فیصل وڑائچ کی ایولیوشن پر سیریز دیکھی تھی اور بہت حیران تھا کہ اتنے مضبوط دلائل ہیں ارتقا سے متعلق۔ لیکن اب یہ سیریز دیکھ رہا ہوں اور اس کو تنقیدی پہلو بھی دیکھ رہا ہوں اس کی بیت ضرورت تھی مسلمان نوجوانوں کو کہ کوئی سائنس کے نام پر یا سائنس کی آڑ میں اسلام کے بارے شکوک شبہات پیدا کر کہ گمراہ نا کر سکے۔ اپ اس طرح کہ علمی سیریز بناتے رہیں تاکہ ہر کوئی سائنس اور اسلام دونوں کو سمجھ سکیں
❤❤
❤
❤❤
❤
❤
❤❤
❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤