🟢07 - Gauss-Seidel Iteration Method: Example 1

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 31

  • @mateobilbao6296
    @mateobilbao6296 10 месяцев назад +6

    Man you saved my semester, God bless you

  • @TN-wh3yf
    @TN-wh3yf 10 месяцев назад +4

    You are just the best when it comes to this Man. Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😊😊😊😊

  • @stephenatiene3450
    @stephenatiene3450 10 месяцев назад +6

    Thanks for making this so easy😊, my maths lecturer just dey make this course look like its so difficult 😢

  • @Favsdata
    @Favsdata 25 дней назад +1

    Thank you so much for making this so easy and clear

  • @TosinTibeju
    @TosinTibeju 11 месяцев назад +2

    Thank you. You made comprehension easy.

  • @miguelrodriguez-qc2uf
    @miguelrodriguez-qc2uf 4 месяца назад +1

    GREAT EXPLANATION! THANKS A LOT

  • @Donya.ss38
    @Donya.ss38 Месяц назад +1

    Hi, could you please explain the difference between this method and Jacobi method?

    • @brahiminounou2665
      @brahiminounou2665 Месяц назад +1

      this one is more efficient , it takes less iterations meaning less time

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  Месяц назад +1

      That's true, because you update the values every time

  • @lilianbotchway6510
    @lilianbotchway6510 10 месяцев назад +3

    Please do you have the matrix approach for this one ?

  • @MyCharm85
    @MyCharm85 10 месяцев назад +1

    If you followed the Jacobi method for the same problem, should you get the same answer for 2 iterations?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  10 месяцев назад +2

      No please, this is because.
      The 2nd iteration for Jacobi takes the previous values for x1-3.
      While the Gauss Seidel takes the updated values in each step to find x1-3

    • @MyCharm85
      @MyCharm85 10 месяцев назад +1

      Makes sense, thank you for the good lesson and feedback. Interested to know if you would get the same answer with enough iterations using different methods

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  10 месяцев назад +1

      @MyCharm85 yes with enough iterations you are likely to get the same answers. But you are likely to arrive at the actual values faster with Gauss-Seidel as compared to Jacobi, since Gauss-Seidel has inputs updated every now and then.

  • @mancchannel9807
    @mancchannel9807 29 дней назад +1

    Why you assume k=2 please anyone answer asap i got exam in like 4 more hours thanks!

    • @michaelotieno4061
      @michaelotieno4061 5 дней назад

      It's second iteration

    • @mr.x991
      @mr.x991 3 дня назад +1

      ​@@michaelotieno4061 you're a little late lol

  • @abbeyuptown-sd4ry
    @abbeyuptown-sd4ry Год назад +1

    Do you teach for the GATE exam sir?

  • @ALIEAKAMARA-gy2vo
    @ALIEAKAMARA-gy2vo Год назад +1

    Sir do have video tutorial videos on Applied electricity (D.C)