Russia launches 7,000mph Zircon hypersonic nuke missile

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
  • RUSSIA has released chilling new footage of its 7,000mph Zircon hypersonic nuke missile that could hit London in five minutes.
    The Kremlin had previously branded the deadly weapon, which carries a conventional or nuclear warhead, “unstoppable”.
    And now terrifying footage shows a Mach 9 Zircon - or Tsirkon - missile being fired, showing how the Russian President could launch a hypersonic nuclear strike on the West.
    The clip showing the missile being fired from the Admiral Gorshkov frigate in the White Sea was revealed amid veiled threats Putin and his top officials to go nuclear if any country intervenes with his invasion of Ukraine.
    Read more:
    Russia releases footage of 7,000mph Zircon hypersonic nuke missile that could hit London in FIVE minutes
    www.thesun.co....
    The Sun newspaper brings you the latest breaking news videos and explainers from the UK and around the world
    Become a Sun Subscriber and hit the bell to be the first to know
    Read The Sun: www.thesun.co.uk
    Like The Sun on Facebook: / thesun
    Follow The Sun on Twitter: / thesun
    Subscribe to The Sun on Snapchat: / 1633225139
    #Russia #Ukraine

Комментарии • 3,9 тыс.

  • @Despon
    @Despon 2 года назад +1758

    this is not a “nuke”, it’s a cruise missile, possibly the fastest of it’s type which can do severe damage to an area but it’s absolutely nothing a nuke like the Topol can bring, Russia would only use these for tactical strikes on targeted areas.

    • @bubbasmith7312
      @bubbasmith7312 2 года назад +33

      Yup I was saying the same thing. That's not a IBM at all. That range of that missile they shots like a few miles at best

    • @Andifitrah24
      @Andifitrah24 2 года назад +10

      So True bro....I agreed

    • @HOLLASOUNDS
      @HOLLASOUNDS 2 года назад +68

      Russia can put a Nuclear payload on it or just standard explosives.

    • @donnamczesty921
      @donnamczesty921 2 года назад +6

      Thank you, that made me feel a little better . All my years feel like everything I was taught was not enough to fully understand what is really happening . Feels like I'm in a crash course learning . Go figure, Good Health to All.

    • @Durgesuth
      @Durgesuth 2 года назад +85

      @@HOLLASOUNDS
      It can be used with a “tactical’ battle field nuclear warhead

  • @nathanielraphael6320
    @nathanielraphael6320 2 года назад +792

    Thats incredibly irresponsible reporting given the context of everything thats going on, you could give some poor person a heart attack, with headlines like that. The fact its intentionally worded in such a way to make someone think a missile is coming at them… what were you thinking. Its so unnecessary.
    You should be ashamed of yourselves trying to capitalise on peoples fear during this catastrophe for some damn clicks.
    Good job Sun… good reporting.

    • @albertparish1729
      @albertparish1729 2 года назад +14

      So there's no nukes being sent anywhere right now?

    • @Cookatron
      @Cookatron 2 года назад +68

      @@albertparish1729 straight for you Albert. Run

    • @albertparish1729
      @albertparish1729 2 года назад +22

      @@Cookatron Why would you joke about that? Im not in the ukraine so im not worried but it could be extremely worrying for some people

    • @maroofs7
      @maroofs7 2 года назад +25

      @@albertparish1729 no nukes sent anywhere yet and hopefully never

    • @alexchristopher221
      @alexchristopher221 2 года назад +14

      London would've been hit by the time this video was posted anyway.

  • @SunnyFLBoy
    @SunnyFLBoy 2 года назад +58

    there is still no air defence system which can stop this missile

    • @jovan1986srb
      @jovan1986srb 2 года назад +7

      So, US has no defence form this system?

    • @Julius55555
      @Julius55555 2 года назад +19

      @@jovan1986srb Nope, the Pentagon is scrambling to achieve a similar missile at least. Don't take it from me, it comes from their own sources.

    • @JackRowsey
      @JackRowsey 2 года назад +1

      @@jovan1986srb From what I saw flying on radar, I know we have something pretty incredible.

    • @NegetiveRizz
      @NegetiveRizz 2 года назад +6

      S500 can

    • @RXK51
      @RXK51 2 года назад +7

      @@jovan1986srb only s500 of Russia can

  • @darnsimpson2330
    @darnsimpson2330 2 года назад +165

    Is this a previous launch from years ago and the news are reporting it now to make things look worst?

    • @IAMGiftbearer
      @IAMGiftbearer 2 года назад +13

      I think it's a simulation or a test just to show what a missile like that would look like, but this network should have said that in the title and not be using it to fear-monger.

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад

      extinction right

    • @cianakril
      @cianakril 2 года назад +18

      Correct. It is indeed the first ship test firings footage from 2019 or 2020 IIRC, and the Sun reports it only now to make it look worse.

    • @mirek1139
      @mirek1139 2 года назад +2

      ​@@cianakril I'd report it as misleading, but terrorism seems more likely to take it down

    • @steventaylor8785
      @steventaylor8785 2 года назад

      @@JanganRaguNonton Yes, Russia extinction.

  • @bobbyhill5067
    @bobbyhill5067 2 года назад +413

    I like how people makes simple assumptions that any missiles are “nukes”… No one needs you to be expert on knowing the velocity and arc range of such missile but at least understand there are different types of missile that is not of nuclear payload.

    • @TecraX2
      @TecraX2 2 года назад +21

      Maybe because the the title says "hypersonic nuke missile"?!?

    • @ConstantineFtw
      @ConstantineFtw 2 года назад +13

      It all depends on the carrier's capability it may or may not carry a nuclear warhead.

    • @historyhastheanswer3757
      @historyhastheanswer3757 2 года назад +11

      Just about any Missle can be loaded with a nuclear payload.

    • @KPX-nl4nt
      @KPX-nl4nt 2 года назад +2

      The target ship was obviously not struck by a missile traveling at Mach 9. It’s also likely it was struck by a different weapon system. Even with an inert warhead, the sheer inertia of a hit from a missile traveling at 7,000mph should have obliterated the bow beyond all recognition, not to mention the lack of plasma visible. This footage was obviously filmed and released via Russian state controlled media. This fact alone should make the rest of the world suspicious.

    • @davetrevor4561
      @davetrevor4561 2 года назад +2

      Russia ; we have nukes damni it,. Ukraine; hold our beers,..we killed 31,000 of you clowns in two weeks

  • @jordan2760
    @jordan2760 2 года назад +30

    Nuke or no nuke hats off to the man getting the shots from underneath that thing getting into form 🚀

  • @duduudu4463
    @duduudu4463 2 года назад +8

    This is The most messed up clickbait title ever

  • @chadthundercock1032
    @chadthundercock1032 2 года назад +66

    "Appear strong when you are weak"

    • @beauchamphuberville1355
      @beauchamphuberville1355 2 года назад +1

      this...

    • @walterthecat2145
      @walterthecat2145 2 года назад +9

      I don’t think their army is weak

    • @bb5979
      @bb5979 2 года назад +8

      @@walterthecat2145 weaker than people think

    • @Artyom1640
      @Artyom1640 2 года назад +15

      well imagine how weak US are then 😀

    • @bb5979
      @bb5979 2 года назад +1

      That makes 0 sense

  • @nordvlad
    @nordvlad 2 года назад +92

    This is an anti-ship missile carrying a 500 kg warhead with a speed of 10,000 km per hour and cutting an aircraft carrier into two parts

    • @incubator6916
      @incubator6916 Год назад +7

      Zircon, produced in 2016, is an anti-ship missile capable of accelerating up to Mach 9. It has been designed to hit enemy surface ships, such as frigates and aircraft carriers, as well as ground targets located within the range of the missile.
      Zircon’s speed (9,800-11,025 km/h) makes it difficult it to be stopped by any anti-aircraft systems. While this launch has been fired from a nuclear submarine, it has already undergone testing from surface carriers.

  • @walbrzych9975
    @walbrzych9975 2 года назад +104

    4.5 billion years this planet has been spinning round and this is where we are. Absolutely pathetic.

    • @youtube-user25
      @youtube-user25 2 года назад +2

      4.5 billion years? You’re taking science fiction there’s no evidence for that.

    • @Unio-Mystica
      @Unio-Mystica 2 года назад +2

      😆😆😆

    • @samjesus8
      @samjesus8 2 года назад +9

      @@youtube-user25 how many years then "mr i know it all". if that's invalid evidence then tell us, how many years?

    • @marcusj1287
      @marcusj1287 2 года назад +1

      Well said.

    • @patricksquinlan1
      @patricksquinlan1 2 года назад

      It was a pretty good run.

  • @sapuyt5410
    @sapuyt5410 2 года назад +764

    Am i the only one who still feel like this war is a dream?
    But wakes up every morning and continue the same day with mourning and stress💔
    End this war for humanity sake🙏

    • @xwing8029
      @xwing8029 2 года назад +19

      @@sameerkhan3757 When did Ukraine launched war against Iraq, Afghanistan, libiya, Syria?

    • @cocos8903
      @cocos8903 2 года назад +3

      Ukraine is fine. This is deflection from Rishi bringing in a CBDC score system like the Chinese. Very soon cryptos out of their control and money will be dropped.
      Everything you've saved will be worthless.

    • @ComedyKraze1
      @ComedyKraze1 2 года назад +2

      @@sameerkhan3757 And if we keep going back in history we can find everything you hate

    • @mikafridmann6031
      @mikafridmann6031 2 года назад +20

      You are so gullible. What about war in Iraq, Libya,Afghanistan,Genocide in Palestine and Yemen that are happening as we speak? People like you make me sick!

    • @lucasart328
      @lucasart328 2 года назад +1

      @@xwing8029 no but usa russia nato did

  • @johnfred2671
    @johnfred2671 2 года назад +14

    It's not a nuke. It's a missile which is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

    • @edmis90
      @edmis90 10 месяцев назад

      difference?

    • @JohnnyCarroll-wi6tx
      @JohnnyCarroll-wi6tx 7 месяцев назад

      actually its a nulear war head carrying a missle.

  • @saulwest8254
    @saulwest8254 2 года назад +6

    Should get the London property prices down to a reasonable level.

    • @lunafringe10
      @lunafringe10 2 года назад +1

      i already bought a few caves in Wales,

    • @prashantmishra9985
      @prashantmishra9985 7 месяцев назад

      Lmao, underrated comment and reply both.

  • @grimbartk8953
    @grimbartk8953 2 года назад +6

    We stand with Russia 🇷🇺❤️🇸🇪

  • @rebelliousslave7946
    @rebelliousslave7946 2 года назад +28

    Nothing denotes absolute military strength & prowness than by requesting miltary aide from China.

    • @alexoolau
      @alexoolau 2 года назад +1

      It is very difficult to be unbiased report. Western media reports have been viewed by Russian as propaganda for the enemy, becoming legit targets in their minds. You gonna see more journalists got killed, or even deliberately targeted. Escalation with insults like this are good motivators for killing more, more hatred, more blood.

    • @BFAO1621
      @BFAO1621 2 года назад

      @S-D thats aboslutly incorret!! theres a certain company called SPACEX(and others) that can do the same, if not better, and cheaper!!
      so, im sorry to tell you but no one needs russia to send things to space...but i do understand what you mean by the russian technology...thats true, russia does have good missile technology...but no one needs russia for space!

    • @stalin1489
      @stalin1489 2 года назад +1

      to much western propoganda cause trouble with the reality...ITS russia you weirdo not ukraine...russia never ask for aid people ask russia for aid...hope you come back to reality soon

    • @AndreyPetroff
      @AndreyPetroff 2 года назад

      Russia and China have already refuted this stupid fart of Western propaganda)))

    • @Frinks22
      @Frinks22 2 года назад

      @@AndreyPetroff China accept the chalenge from Russia, so its ON...

  • @davidpatterson9770
    @davidpatterson9770 2 года назад +177

    Its funny how the US has been developing hypersonic tech for 30 years and china and russia have already developed it. I think the USA doesn't show their hand like China and Russia does.

    • @scottjohnson8996
      @scottjohnson8996 2 года назад +35

      Common sense, usa has had hypersonic aircraft for 50years. They spend way more than the others. Wouldnt be surprised if usa already has space tech weapons. They've teased it for years

    • @Thestorminator89
      @Thestorminator89 2 года назад +34

      Yea, it's scarier if the enemy doesn't know what weapons you have. Then they don't know what to expect.

    • @rtqii
      @rtqii 2 года назад +21

      They have tried to be more serious about this since stealth technologies were disclosed. When you see popular new weapon systems terminated, that is often a sign that the technology has already become obsolete, and they have something better.

    • @displaychicken
      @displaychicken 2 года назад +13

      Absolutely. Russia and China, both being simple minded authoritarian style countries, believe in a lot of chest beating and portrayals of strength.
      Commies are famous for their military parades but as we see, when it’s time to do battles their performance is pretty poor.

    • @Leon-uu4wk
      @Leon-uu4wk 2 года назад +16

      USA unfortunately used all their hyper sonic missiles on innocent civilians in iIraq, Afghanistan, libiya and Syria.
      they are rebulding everything.

  • @sohrabforhad5393
    @sohrabforhad5393 2 года назад +6

    Congratulations Russia from Bangladesh 🇧🇩💗🇷🇺

  • @danielpena-un8vl
    @danielpena-un8vl 2 года назад +13

    They’re so technically advanced that they’re now begging China for military assistance.

    • @Califamilymanprepper
      @Califamilymanprepper 2 года назад +2

      That was funny

    • @Revioliexe
      @Revioliexe 2 года назад

      Bru

    • @happines3511
      @happines3511 2 года назад

      do you believe in the media?

    • @danielpena-un8vl
      @danielpena-un8vl 2 года назад

      @@happines3511 so you dont think the CIA know everything the russian government is doing behind the scenes? The US predicted russia's invasion, thats was a very credible prediction from what we've seen.

  • @rinato7757
    @rinato7757 2 года назад +48

    Russia is trying to show how strong she is, in other to hide her weaknesses.

    • @Smokedout33
      @Smokedout33 2 года назад +5

      100%

    • @aabb8011
      @aabb8011 2 года назад +14

      go on and test the weaknesses then, like 200+ foreign mercenaries already dead in ukraine, come there and join these numbers

    • @edugio
      @edugio 2 года назад +2

      Its weakness is being ruled by thugs led by Putin.

    • @kalebsuperman3202
      @kalebsuperman3202 2 года назад +1

      Way better than emma and her two moms

    • @aabb8011
      @aabb8011 2 года назад +8

      @James Godfrey i live in Russia and none of the prices even doubled, except from car prices (temporarily) going up and graphic cards prices going up as well. our gas prices are going down too, so idk what u talking about

  • @leathernecksapperredleg2752
    @leathernecksapperredleg2752 2 года назад +160

    Russia has a huge advantage in tactical nuclear weapons. I don’t know if this cruise missile is nuclear tipped, but regardless, Russia has an extremely dangerous low-yield tactical nuclear arsenal.

    • @cianakril
      @cianakril 2 года назад +13

      It's big enough for the tactical nuke warhead. Comes in both versions, as every other Russian cruise missiles. Nuclear is for aircraft carrier groups if need be, conventional for everything else.

    • @georgeousthegorgeous
      @georgeousthegorgeous 2 года назад +5

      nuclear capable.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 2 года назад

      "Russia has an extremely dangerous low-yield tactical nuclear arsenal"
      Yeah, and it is the only one, NOT!

    • @natashabegley1346
      @natashabegley1346 2 года назад +6

      Lol not even half the other super powers have 99% of Russian tec and weapons are 50 years old.

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior 2 года назад +7

      @@natashabegley1346 What Russian tech? When are we going to see it?

  • @joesmith942
    @joesmith942 2 года назад +68

    Awesome. Now if the boat only had some fuel.

    • @maltimoto
      @maltimoto 2 года назад +2

      And their vechicles have cheap chinese tires haha

    • @StonedNT
      @StonedNT 2 года назад

      🤣

    • @lieshs1890
      @lieshs1890 2 года назад +11

      Lol russia is the biggest supplier of gas oil.

    • @slimjim7411
      @slimjim7411 2 года назад

      @@lieshs1890 Yeah but they're so broke all they can do is sell it cheap, they can't afford to just burn it for themselves. Same reason why they have so few of their top jets, and tanks. They built them to sell as export and can't afford to upkeep and large inventory of them.

    • @scottcupp8129
      @scottcupp8129 2 года назад

      yeah she is dead in the water. Maybe a Ukrainian fishing boat can tow her back to dock LOL

  • @sethg7085
    @sethg7085 2 года назад +5

    Propaganda... oh look we have a fast missile... 🇺🇸 yeah so do we

  • @handsoffmygunmf6750
    @handsoffmygunmf6750 2 года назад +2

    Care to let us check the speed of the missile to see if you're telling the truth? I didn't think so.

  • @AaaAaa-jh9os
    @AaaAaa-jh9os 8 месяцев назад +3

    Дорогие британцы,вам не нужно бояться наших ракет.У берегов Британии достаточно давно заложена подводная система "Посейдон")))

  • @LADY_JEMIMA_FORTESCUE
    @LADY_JEMIMA_FORTESCUE 2 года назад +26

    Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake -: Napoleon Bonaparte

    • @NordStream88
      @NordStream88 2 года назад +2

      Napoleon 1812 ))))))

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад +5

      extinction west 2022

    • @delpinsky
      @delpinsky 2 года назад +1

      @@JanganRaguNonton Extinction East and West 2022 my friend... I'm sorry for you. Nuclear Winter for the lucky ones who will still be alive.

    • @meikacamelia3334
      @meikacamelia3334 2 года назад +1

      The same Napoleon bonaparte get defeated by Russian?

    • @stefou1311
      @stefou1311 2 года назад

      @@meikacamelia3334 Defeated because not interrupted 😅

  • @RoscoeJames
    @RoscoeJames 2 года назад +20

    If it works like their tanks it won't do much.

    • @14fadu6
      @14fadu6 2 года назад +1

      Of course it's easy to open your mouth when you're used to wars not being fought in your own country. I would be interested to know if you are still such a loudmouth when such a rocket has wiped out your family.

  • @toolfreak78
    @toolfreak78 2 года назад +191

    A tomahawk is also a nuke missle, when you put a nuclear warhead on it. Most ballistic missles are nuke missles, because with the most of them you can put a nuclear warhead on it.

    • @xronisxronis
      @xronisxronis 2 года назад +9

      But with a small warhead and 1500 miles rnage..

    • @toolfreak78
      @toolfreak78 2 года назад +10

      @@xronisxronis thats true, but still it can warheads, and these "small" warheads are hundreds of thousands times stronger than hiroshima and can blow up every big city in the world.

    • @akashnepak504
      @akashnepak504 2 года назад +28

      Tomahawk not hypersonic heck its not even supersonic

    • @toolfreak78
      @toolfreak78 2 года назад +4

      @@akashnepak504 who said that? I only said it can carry a nuclear warhead.

    • @1nation964
      @1nation964 2 года назад +13

      tomahawk is not hypersonic

  • @bartoszbaranowski604
    @bartoszbaranowski604 2 года назад +95

    If its as accurate as other missiles shown in videos from ukraine, there is high chance it will hit Kremling, not London....

    • @skie6282
      @skie6282 2 года назад +8

      If it is as reliable as those too there is a 25% chance it just wont blow up

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 2 года назад +15

      London will be a radioactive wasteland before you could finish saying "I was wron....."

    • @MrRikko951
      @MrRikko951 2 года назад

      hope so

    • @millmoormichael6630
      @millmoormichael6630 2 года назад +2

      @@slooob23 You must be proud.

    • @bartoszbaranowski604
      @bartoszbaranowski604 2 года назад +1

      @S-D Space is big, hard to miss and actually... thats no longer true. It was just joint venture, now it isnt.

  • @trollonthebrain1455
    @trollonthebrain1455 2 года назад +76

    Careful of those that are silent about their plans and when to strike.

    • @fabioartoscassone9305
      @fabioartoscassone9305 2 года назад +6

      but when russians talk too much, u know they are bluffing

    • @aripali9735
      @aripali9735 2 года назад +10

      @@fabioartoscassone9305 russia is actually top 1 military imagine not being world first economy but yet still can make dangerous weapon even with sanction u guys suffering like hel hahaha

    • @trollonthebrain1455
      @trollonthebrain1455 2 года назад +2

      @@fabioartoscassone9305 exactly.. their are getting known for their lies. I'm actually scared of what US defense has..

    • @fabioartoscassone9305
      @fabioartoscassone9305 2 года назад +11

      @@trollonthebrain1455 "we will conquer ukraine in 3 days" yeah.for sure...

    • @alexm890
      @alexm890 2 года назад +2

      That is why US tell Russia big doesn’t bluff because they have responsibility it is very difficult for America to make aggressive statement

  • @popthatbeep
    @popthatbeep Год назад +2

    If you've been hostile to a big resourceful country for 60 years, what kind of weapon do you expect from them? lol

  • @westlondon3556
    @westlondon3556 2 года назад +30

    Lol. You couldn't even defeat Ukraine. Go get a chill pill 💊

    • @gdiwolverinemale2745
      @gdiwolverinemale2745 2 года назад +2

      Ukraine is a large country. Conventional weapons don't work well in densely populated areas. Nukes on the other hand can create a roast very quickly

    • @yogeshcyr31
      @yogeshcyr31 2 года назад +11

      better than how UK took 20 years in Afghanistan only to be kicked out by Talibani farmers.

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад

      extinction west that is one of my program country.. immediately ISS crash to earth.. west very slaughther in middle east so I need revenge it🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺uraaa😀☺

    • @SD-yt9fe
      @SD-yt9fe 2 года назад

      @@yogeshcyr31 LOL

  • @prdamico
    @prdamico 2 года назад +5

    "let the bodies hit the floor, let the bodies hit the floor"

  • @sahromahamed9283
    @sahromahamed9283 2 года назад +1

    🇸🇴🇷🇺 We tired Western hypocrisy crocodile tear
    🐊 😢 keep going 🇷🇺 🇸🇴💪💪

  • @danacallanan2922
    @danacallanan2922 2 года назад +43

    This is totally irresponsible, and extremely dangerous at this time

    • @lunafringe10
      @lunafringe10 2 года назад +3

      its wonderful. i ll be facing god within minutes,

    • @PortlandMan
      @PortlandMan 2 года назад +5

      @@lunafringe10 God don't exist mate stop deluding yourself. You're going to just turn into ash like the rest of us.

    • @user-ur6xs4cj4u
      @user-ur6xs4cj4u 2 года назад

      Wakie wakie

    • @peacelove6455
      @peacelove6455 2 года назад

      @@PortlandMan Spoken by the great oracle himself, Adam Dymock. His name echoes through time as the wisest man who ever walked earth.

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад

      extinction west that is one of my program country.. immediately ISS crash to earth.. west very slaughther in middle east so I need revenge it😇i love blood west

  • @princerechebei12
    @princerechebei12 2 года назад +7

    Russia: I present to you the Mach 9 missile
    USA: welp, here’s a Mach 20
    Russia: 😲

    • @alastair9446
      @alastair9446 2 года назад

      More like USA: Welp, here is my laser at light speed.

    • @justdude2775
      @justdude2775 2 года назад +7

      if only we had a cure for cancer competitions like that

    • @Xerox482
      @Xerox482 2 года назад +1

      @@justdude2775 cure cant make u money , missiles means war mean money , no cure for cancer mean drugs selling which mean money , cure mean no money

    • @zenittolik
      @zenittolik 2 года назад

      Сходи в школу

    • @ejimayang3687
      @ejimayang3687 2 года назад

      @@Xerox482 it's the real world we live in.

  • @muhammedrahman7013
    @muhammedrahman7013 3 месяца назад +1

    "Say Hello to My Little Friend" ❤️🇷🇺❤️"From Russia with Love" Goodbye and Good Riddance!

  • @dimsim7989
    @dimsim7989 2 года назад +7

    Look at this Russian , eyeballing a nuclear test with no safety goggles .🤔🤔🤔

    • @dynaflow666
      @dynaflow666 2 года назад +1

      In Russia, nuclear roocket wears eye protection.

    • @mrbrain3339
      @mrbrain3339 2 года назад

      There wasn't nuclear explosion

  • @krackeded7236
    @krackeded7236 2 года назад +40

    i looked all over the internet for this so call nuke strike... was quite weird when it didnt show up anywhere else. oh... they fired a test shot with nothing in it or shared an old video...

    • @CP-28
      @CP-28 2 года назад +8

      I wouldn't be surprised... UK tabloid (not journalism)...

    • @Jknight416
      @Jknight416 2 года назад +1

      Goes to show that you shouldn't take everything showcased on media as face value. When there's a war between two nations, there's propaganda along with it. And there's no a propaganda war that's happening between Russia and Ukraine on to of the actual ground war that's going on there.

    • @adder2204
      @adder2204 2 года назад

      Judging by the clothes and the quality of the video, this is very old news, brought back for click bait :( the West is just as bad for propaganda, are we meant to hate Russian people? This isn't a race of people against us, this is one to five meglamaniacs trying to go out with a bang.

    • @chrissymoss514
      @chrissymoss514 2 года назад

      Yep, just a tatty scrap of propaganda 🥱

    • @c_lo01
      @c_lo01 2 года назад

      This is from a russian tv show called zvesda tv(Combat approved). This was stolen by 'The Sun' and used for propaganda.

  • @ZHOUKINGS
    @ZHOUKINGS 2 года назад +5

    Viva Russia, You're number One!

    • @SirBaited
      @SirBaited 2 года назад +3

      The US already have hypersonic missile

    • @user-wj2im5gg3r
      @user-wj2im5gg3r Год назад +3

      ​@@SirBaited no they didn't have

    • @ZHOUKINGS
      @ZHOUKINGS Год назад

      @@SirBaited Funny. US have a late development of hypersonic. Last year they developed and was tested this April 2022, but have many failures of testing. The US developed only air to surface hypersonic. They do'nt have a ground to air hypersonic missile.

  • @davidjr4903
    @davidjr4903 2 года назад +8

    Glory to Mother Russia 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 ❤️ ❤️ ❤️

  • @bambamkitring6666
    @bambamkitring6666 2 года назад +4

    Good job Russia !

  • @kevinfidler6287
    @kevinfidler6287 2 года назад +2

    The same weapon fired over and over again from different angles. There is no indication of supersonic flight in this video. The footage of the flight is too short.

    • @MarkM001
      @MarkM001 2 года назад +1

      Absolutely correct!

  • @aussiecook167
    @aussiecook167 2 года назад +19

    Propaganda from weak dogs

    • @heleneallane6444
      @heleneallane6444 Год назад

      Eat Russian food and listen Russian music

    • @heleneallane6444
      @heleneallane6444 Год назад

      Long live Russiantowns from United State America,Canada and Australia

    • @heleneallane6444
      @heleneallane6444 Год назад

      Long live Kazakhstan,China and Russia

  • @phillyspecial2506
    @phillyspecial2506 2 года назад +23

    This is neither a “nuke” nor is it hypersonic. Especially not Mach 9. Most people can’t comprehend how fast 7000 mph is. That missile definitely wasn’t hypersonic.

    • @toddr2265
      @toddr2265 2 года назад +4

      It's adorable that Russia believes that the US doesn't have hypersonic missiles. LOL...we were working on them in the 60's

    • @davidturner4987
      @davidturner4987 2 года назад +1

      My thoughts exactly. Why blur it out on the closeup, so we can't identify it and have to take their word for it. On the impact shot you can see the missile, were it really traveling at hypersonic speed you would not and the kinetic impact energy alone would have been much more spectacular. Just more propaganda as usual. putin is trying to flex and appear stronger than he actually is. The entire invasion is a dumpster fire and putin knows it.

    • @xolif3143
      @xolif3143 2 года назад +4

      @@toddr2265 why they didn't help Ukraine directly

    • @KKM57P
      @KKM57P 2 года назад

      @@toddr2265 MGM-31B Pershing II had a MARV. A MARV travels with hypersonic and is maneuverable.

    • @stephenmurray2851
      @stephenmurray2851 2 года назад +3

      @@toddr2265 where did it say Russia says America doesn't have them?

  • @mutleyjr3445
    @mutleyjr3445 2 года назад +2

    GOD BLESS MOTHER RUSSIA !!! URAAAAAAA

  • @Altair885
    @Altair885 2 года назад +57

    Like the US and NATO don't have their own. The US were doing scram jet testing decades ago, I dare say that they've built ones capable of carrying warheads by now! Better the enemy doesn't know what you have in some respects.

    • @aleinstein3223
      @aleinstein3223 2 года назад +8

      1960s technology

    • @kaypakaipa8559
      @kaypakaipa8559 2 года назад +13

      Lol u think russia has publicized its full artillery 😂,
      When the ussr shutdown in 90s the world thought they had 10,000nukes,
      They handed in 40,000 nukes instead.
      Learn from history

    • @alexm890
      @alexm890 2 года назад +3

      Russia always miss information if this is hypersonic what is the difference between this missile and orders??

    • @ExiSTEIN
      @ExiSTEIN 2 года назад

      @@kaypakaipa8559 And the amis have nothing!!!
      HA,HA,HA,,,,Stupid thinking!!!

    • @osrikking8785
      @osrikking8785 2 года назад +8

      @@kaypakaipa8559 Russia publicizes about 10 time MORE than they have or are capable of most of the time! Just a paper tiger floating on the breath of lies and propaganda - as always.

  • @DarioSinger
    @DarioSinger 2 года назад +281

    It can reach a target at 1000 km far at a speed of Match 9 and can be mount with a nuclear head. The distance from Kaliningrad to London is 1,417.36 km but often Russian ships are closer than that to GB and France for instance when they are crossing the British Chanel.

    • @mariojakel5544
      @mariojakel5544 2 года назад +5

      250-500 km not more and its still not ready you see only pictures of a test US security circles assume the first operational readiness in 2023 but this assessment was given befor the War in the ukrain started

    • @googleuser2609
      @googleuser2609 2 года назад +6

      And then all of those Russian entities would be blown into oblivion, so Russia would therefore never launch such a missile.
      *reach, not "rich" by the way.

    • @mikefandango9455
      @mikefandango9455 2 года назад +21

      Yes and we can reach all of Russia with our nuclear weapons! Our subs are with striking distance now! 🇬🇧

    • @DarioSinger
      @DarioSinger 2 года назад +23

      @@mikefandango9455 no as fast as a zircon missile. Anyway in the orribile scenario of nuclear war Little Britain could be the first country to disappear from the face of the 🌎 while Kaliningrad is only 850 miles from London while whomever will be in charge of Russia which is the largest country of the planets will have plenty of space to hide and could be very well at 6 or 7 thousand miles away on the other side of the globe. This is just to say that we should stop to play with fire.

    • @tinovalente7201
      @tinovalente7201 2 года назад +7

      @@DarioSinger I'm sure nato has all that covered probably the US alone

  • @bendalton5221
    @bendalton5221 Год назад +1

    you're being overdramatic... it's not a nuclear missile, it's a ship fired missile designed to penetrate the defenses of an American carrier group. A missile going 7000mph pretty much renders the close-in Phalanx defense system obsolete

  • @Larsbor
    @Larsbor 2 года назад +7

    7000mph thats alot.. how hot would such a rocket get at that speed?

    • @darkcomet1607
      @darkcomet1607 2 года назад

      Thats like 3 kilometres per second

    • @bittripper3530
      @bittripper3530 2 года назад +1

      Not as hot as one travelling at 25,000mph :-)

    • @mehmetistanbul7334
      @mehmetistanbul7334 2 года назад +4

      I dont believe in its speed.. i havent seen 2.8km/sec speed there.. Classical Russian bluffs.

    • @mburujoseph1565
      @mburujoseph1565 2 года назад +3

      @@mehmetistanbul7334 but isn't that the point; you cant see it when it reaches th e speed.

    • @Dallasbird1975
      @Dallasbird1975 2 года назад

      @@mehmetistanbul7334

  • @Nosuchthingasnormalhere
    @Nosuchthingasnormalhere 2 года назад +4

    7000mph? I doubt they have that tech.

    • @thatisabsolutelykooooge2211
      @thatisabsolutelykooooge2211 6 месяцев назад +2

      Don’t doubt it because They do. I’ve seen an incredibly frightening test video of their ICBMs with MERVs conducting and accuracy test in some rocky place in Siberia. RUclips took it down. I’ve never heard sounds like that in my life. Also, the speed at which they landed felt like it was even faster than 7000 mph and by a lot

  • @petslife3665
    @petslife3665 2 года назад +2

    Zirkon missile didnt exist even. That’s another one missile.

  • @psychobeam99
    @psychobeam99 2 года назад +13

    Classic Russia. "If we lose everyone lose."

    • @psychobeam99
      @psychobeam99 2 года назад +3

      @@andonisgaja7379 Mmmh. Thats true but Russia isnt in a corner. Losing sure but not cornered.

    • @nomad7734
      @nomad7734 2 года назад

      Why not... lol

    • @soapbullet6565
      @soapbullet6565 2 года назад

      Putin smartest then dumb Biden

    • @chaosdweller
      @chaosdweller 2 года назад

      @@andonisgaja7379 but didn't they like attack first while kinda being in a corner ? Lol,... which implies mental empairment lol!

    • @chaosdweller
      @chaosdweller 2 года назад

      Is that the style ? 🤔

  • @tracnunya7165
    @tracnunya7165 2 года назад +6

    Lol wat a load of crap, the missile is normal then goes hyper as it closes in, it has a VERY limited range due to fuel use and is ONLY good for close range small targets like other ships at sea and IT DOES NOT CARRY A NUKE instead it relies on high speed armor penetration and explosive

    • @egortitov9494
      @egortitov9494 2 года назад

      It's capable to be either high explosive or nuclear.

    • @tracnunya7165
      @tracnunya7165 2 года назад

      @@egortitov9494 yeah, gonna waste a nuke on a ship to ship missile

    • @egortitov9494
      @egortitov9494 2 года назад

      @@tracnunya7165 If it's a big group of ships with aircraft carier it may be used.

    • @tracnunya7165
      @tracnunya7165 2 года назад

      @@egortitov9494 it would the death sentence of a nation to nuke a carrier

    • @egortitov9494
      @egortitov9494 2 года назад

      @@tracnunya7165 It's normal to be used in case of the nuclear war. And I don't see how it won't be in the future. Look, some broken missile attacks Russia or NATO and US, and other side fires back.

  • @husainibnrosyid1234
    @husainibnrosyid1234 2 года назад +1

    do not worry. Russia would never use nuclear weapons as the US did on WW2

  • @pcka12
    @pcka12 2 года назад +46

    Seems a good reason to torpedo the ships before they can ever launch a missile!

    • @darkcomet1607
      @darkcomet1607 2 года назад +13

      Yea good luck with submarines
      You still dont understand, attacking Russia or getting in their way means both west and Russia evaporates
      And i think Putin is ready for this

    • @pcka12
      @pcka12 2 года назад +1

      @@darkcomet1607 that is what ‘hunter killer’ submarines are for! They do not launch nuclear warheads & they would not exist unless they were effective against surface vessels.

    • @mst7155
      @mst7155 2 года назад +1

      Putin is threatening the whole free world! He feels that nobody has the guts to stand up against his "tremendous" military power that includes nukes,hypersonic missiles....... In the meantime the free world does not stop every single trade with him..... It is a very dangerous situation.This mad dictator doesn't give a damn about his own people.The simple fact that the sanctions aren't that terrible,and he can do business with China has a very sedative effect on him! It's a matter of time till he will bully some other countries, very possible he will start another war once the job of distroying Ucraine is finished.

    • @Lifestyle-kb4dw
      @Lifestyle-kb4dw 2 года назад

      Poseidon 😊

    • @kalebsuperman3202
      @kalebsuperman3202 2 года назад

      Then nukes comes in

  • @scotarg1973
    @scotarg1973 2 года назад +4

    The Sun, scaremongering by posting an old video that's irrelevant to what's going on in Ukraine.
    The Russians have faster missiles anyway. Mach 9 is fast but hypersonic is something like Mach 20.

    • @nickluckovitch3288
      @nickluckovitch3288 2 года назад +2

      Hypersonic is classified as a speed anywhere between mach 5-10. Mach 10 to mach 25 is generally classified as high hypersonic.

  • @johnvitalis2656
    @johnvitalis2656 2 года назад +1

    an ICBM goes to about 15,000 MPH....Hypersonic missile to about 8,000 MPH and less range.

  • @Submersed24
    @Submersed24 2 года назад +16

    It amazes me how it has enough fuel to travel so far

    • @arrenlambert1486
      @arrenlambert1486 2 года назад +2

      It will use its fuel to travel up, gain speed and position, the rest is a decent to target.
      That’s my understanding of it anyways

    • @Submersed24
      @Submersed24 2 года назад

      @@arrenlambert1486 ah so it puts itself in orbit essentially?

    • @arrenlambert1486
      @arrenlambert1486 2 года назад

      @@Submersed24 i wouldn’t say it puts itself in orbit, not that I know of anyways, I wouldn’t take my understanding of them as an exact science.

    • @srmatte1
      @srmatte1 2 года назад

      I'm skeptical about Russia's claims about their supposed hyper-sonic missile. Has anyone recorded it flying 3800mph?

    • @georgeousthegorgeous
      @georgeousthegorgeous 2 года назад

      @@srmatte1 yup. everybody is scared anyway.

  • @julwiezdeghorz5089
    @julwiezdeghorz5089 2 года назад +37

    If armed with nuclear tipped, even a near miss hit can sink an entire carrier battle group.

    • @sqr2024
      @sqr2024 2 года назад +2

      Not really, remember the Bikini Atomic tests?

    • @LUCIFER-di8gs
      @LUCIFER-di8gs 2 года назад

      MAD EH

    • @omarwilliams1145
      @omarwilliams1145 2 года назад +1

      @@sqr2024 You have no clue, Boy. 😲

    • @mrknowitall8663
      @mrknowitall8663 2 года назад +9

      100% agree. What makes America so powerful is our 11 aircraft carriers. Those will be taken out on day 1 with hypersonic munitions. US Aircraft Carriers can not stop hypersonics they've admitted this already. Scary times.

    • @KB4QAA
      @KB4QAA 2 года назад +2

      Well, no. Naval ships do not sail in close formation. They are miles apart. The Baker tests show just how little nuclear blasts affect ships.

  • @06madmartin
    @06madmartin 2 года назад +2

    The guy doing the count down looks like he is loving his life choices

  • @powerkitemad
    @powerkitemad 2 года назад +51

    I'm seeing a stock missile launch, but no evidence of the claim it's hypersonic. They couldn't even get an SDcard with the correct transfer speed so I'm not too worried 😀

    • @TheNefastor
      @TheNefastor 2 года назад +3

      Yeah this could have been a Brahmos launch.

    • @unclescipio3136
      @unclescipio3136 2 года назад +2

      Given the general level of Russian military competence, it probably needs to use a European commercial satellite for GPS and the conscripted tech guy didn't load enough data on its account.

    • @jaykay8295
      @jaykay8295 2 года назад +3

      Lol.. Keyboard generals in full flow ^^

    • @soladsani
      @soladsani 2 года назад +3

      Putin the GREAT 🇷🇺🚀✌

    • @redspecial4102
      @redspecial4102 2 года назад +1

      Yeah,we got one that goes a billion miles an hour... no, really. 🇬🇧🤣🇬🇧

  • @adamweston4152
    @adamweston4152 2 года назад +4

    That's no zircon missile, it's far too small.

    • @chrissydecker6793
      @chrissydecker6793 2 года назад +5

      Glad I wasn't the only one that noticed. Plus this was a test from years ago. Not recent. It's propaganda

    • @adamweston4152
      @adamweston4152 2 года назад +4

      @@chrissydecker6793 I'm really not impressed with the sun for posting this in the first place, surely they know that it's not a zircon missile and also the scare factor for people who are already afraid of nuclear war. They need to take this video down and do their homework before releasing such types of video.

  • @gool54
    @gool54 2 года назад +2

    This how dumb people think they've seen an UFO

  • @lostinpa-dadenduro7555
    @lostinpa-dadenduro7555 2 года назад +9

    Why is the Sun playing Russian propaganda videos ?

    • @lizmitchel8855
      @lizmitchel8855 2 года назад

      Putin loves RUclips

    • @teok117
      @teok117 2 года назад +1

      They get paid in rubles

  • @TheRealBoroNut
    @TheRealBoroNut 2 года назад +15

    "RUSSIA has released chilling new footage of its 7,000mph Zircon hypersonic nuke missile that could hit London in five minutes."
    The trick is knowing which 5 minutes it will hit London in, then be somewhere else for half an hour. Also, London is a massive place. It hardly speaks volumes for its accuracy. It would be more impressive if it could hit something like the Kings Arms.
    I hate the Kings Arms.

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад +3

      uraaaa🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺☺

    • @-Ultranoobgaming-
      @-Ultranoobgaming- 2 года назад +2

      What about aircraft carrier groups? Carrier have protection of dozens ships. And this is hypersonic speed nuke, which modern naval ships need Jedy force to interrupt actually

    • @JLocke573
      @JLocke573 2 года назад

      I would also like the Kings Arms to be destroyed

    • @IntrovertRahulRK
      @IntrovertRahulRK 2 года назад

      I would be glad to see destroyed London.just like Churchill enjoyed the bengal famine and general Dyer enjoyed the punjab massacre.. support Russia from india ..no matter what happens india always with Russia 🇮🇳♥️🇷🇺

    • @jamesgreen6171
      @jamesgreen6171 2 года назад

      @boro nut The explosive yield of the nagasaki and hiroshima nuclear bombs was anywhere between 6 to 26 kt which was enoug h to instantly flatten both cities and vaporize more than 100000 people mostly civilians, but the explosive power of a thermonuclear missile than can reach london in five minutes has 200 kt which is unimaginable to think how much destruction that can cause not just to london but to the whole of the uk with the nuclear fallout

  • @skidhvh
    @skidhvh 2 года назад +2

    This is not true, it doesnt contain nucelar warhead, its anti ship missle, that can travel only about 1000km.
    What yall should be worried about is "Avangard", its hypersonic icbm, that contains multiple nucelar warheads

    • @TRR23123
      @TRR23123 2 года назад

      But this missile actually has > 300 HE, >200 kt tnw nuclear warhead and the warhead weight 300-400 kg

  • @chaosiscoming9184
    @chaosiscoming9184 2 года назад +32

    The missile could take 5mins to hit London? I'm in london :O
    Well please let me know 4mins before so I can have enough time to grab all my Batman collectables and hide under the table with them. Cos u know hiding under the table means I will survive. They do in the movies

    • @flameout12345
      @flameout12345 2 года назад +1

      Make good uses of that 5 min

    • @sameerkhan3757
      @sameerkhan3757 2 года назад +3

      Don't forget to delete your browsing history too mate..

    • @mallerywallinger1096
      @mallerywallinger1096 2 года назад +2

      Don't forget to unplug the T.V.......don't wanna waste electric.

    • @calor6990
      @calor6990 2 года назад +1

      Lmao man that's a good one😂

    • @davidjohn64
      @davidjohn64 2 года назад

      Enjoy ....RIP .

  • @taylorosborne3383
    @taylorosborne3383 2 года назад +4

    Woahhhh it’s so dope seeing ships shoot missiles

  • @williammunny1844
    @williammunny1844 2 года назад +1

    How does Russia spend so much less on their military, yet seem to have superior weaponry? 🤔

    • @clapanse
      @clapanse 2 года назад +1

      Because Russia brags about stuff they don't have, while the US has stuff they don't brag about.

    • @lissettelopez8331
      @lissettelopez8331 Год назад

      Talk is cheap, but weapons cost money. Why build a hypersonic when I can make a cheap video that people believe? I gotta give them that, it's very effective.

  • @matthewbentley794
    @matthewbentley794 2 года назад +7

    They forgot to include the fact that the missile was supposed to go the other way...

    • @lunafringe10
      @lunafringe10 2 года назад

      yaeh, direction Berlin. all our problems solved. Including the tiny bald clown there

  • @oliashton8462
    @oliashton8462 2 года назад +7

    this fearmongering, titling something like that in a time like this isn't a good idea. Shame!

  • @Sgt_Bill_T_Co
    @Sgt_Bill_T_Co 2 года назад +1

    7000 miles per hour? it would burn up in the atmosphere long before it hit the ground.

  • @chriswoods662
    @chriswoods662 2 года назад +9

    we've got more data on the russian military in the last two weeks than all of the cold war

  • @markm6488
    @markm6488 2 года назад +10

    Only problem is, can they get the ship started, the fuel is probably 50 years old. and they don't have enough cans of starter fluid to get it to crank over. 🤣🤣

  • @gelocastro418
    @gelocastro418 2 года назад +1

    This is the best example of misleading news.

  • @timmartin2894
    @timmartin2894 2 года назад +6

    This is a hypersonic cruise missile with a max range of 1000 Km. It could have a small nuclear warhead, but it is primarily an anti-ship missile. And it couldn't reach London from Russia...

    • @METRIKVX
      @METRIKVX 2 года назад +1

      @@masudpasha5835 Russia is not the only country with nukes. They're not stupid enough to use them.

    • @azizbouderbala7542
      @azizbouderbala7542 6 месяцев назад

      No but its on a ship, and the ship can reach London, also a sub

  • @amirulhakimi9264
    @amirulhakimi9264 2 года назад +5

    I tried so hard and got so far
    But in the end it doesn't even matter
    I had to fall to lose it all
    But in the end it doesn't even matter

    • @amirulhakimi9264
      @amirulhakimi9264 2 года назад

      @@kowalski7086 🥺😭

    • @jamesgreen6171
      @jamesgreen6171 2 года назад

      @@kowalski7086 that song obviously said alot about his state of mind years before his suicide

    • @kowalski7086
      @kowalski7086 2 года назад

      @@jamesgreen6171 Linkin Park were good. I saw a video of Chester Bennington a day before his death and he looked quite normal, shame nobody could see what was really going on. May be Rest In Peace.

  • @jackiechan3509
    @jackiechan3509 2 года назад +1

    Meaning any iron dome in the world is useless....period

  • @shaunmcinnis1960
    @shaunmcinnis1960 2 года назад +6

    What would have been nice to see the trajectory of that missile from a far distance back like maybe 2 miles to get an idea of the speed

    • @icantthinkofaname4265
      @icantthinkofaname4265 2 года назад +6

      But then we'd know it wasn't actually hypersonic and this was all propaganda lol.

    • @wassimmhaouek5868
      @wassimmhaouek5868 2 года назад

      @@icantthinkofaname4265 even at that scale experts at nato can figure out if it's hypersonic or not , they admited it and you are the smart who see the propaganda hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    • @MikeOxlong-
      @MikeOxlong- 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@icantthinkofaname4265we already know that by everything about the video (especially the target end). It wasn’t travelling more than 600 kph when it hit that fence, because if it were you wouldn’t have seen any frames of it in the video at all (especially considering it was filmed at 30fps)… 😂

  • @Metalshark100
    @Metalshark100 2 года назад +26

    its wrong but its beautiful, the controlled tilt on that rocket and the explosive power behind that acceleration was pure beauty. i should've became a rocket scientist.

    • @centeguahan3760
      @centeguahan3760 2 года назад +2

      I sheepishly agree with you on the design & engineering perspective.

    • @alexanderxavier3078
      @alexanderxavier3078 2 года назад

      They're not wrong, we're just using them wrong

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 2 года назад +1

      It's actually a bad sign that it needs additional thrusters to tilt. Other missiles can maneuver with their main engines.

    • @Metalshark100
      @Metalshark100 2 года назад

      @@tritium1998 oh, i just thought it was amazing seeing that. the engineering behind this must have been pretty complicated, at least from my pov.

    • @asatechnics8363
      @asatechnics8363 2 года назад

      @@tritium1998 what ''hypersonic missile'' does it with their main engines ? 0.o like thrust vectoring engines? 0.0

  • @HeavensDemon966
    @HeavensDemon966 2 года назад +1

    I saw no compelling evidence that the missile launched in this video was a hypersonic missile.

  • @williamsherman1942
    @williamsherman1942 2 года назад +4

    Well, it doesn’t change the outcome. You nuke London and Moscow is turned into a nuclear wasteland a few minutes late then the usual lol

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад

      my program 🥲extinction west... i am not killer but i am angel for soul west

    • @williamsherman1942
      @williamsherman1942 2 года назад

      @@JanganRaguNonton Cyka Blyat comrade

    • @haironyourscreenlol
      @haironyourscreenlol 2 года назад +1

      you nuke moscow and london will be wiped out from the globe

  • @pauldurkee4764
    @pauldurkee4764 2 года назад +76

    A hypersonic cruise missile, I assume being test fired in the black sea, I'm not sure a cruise missile type would have the necessary range to reach the UK, I may be wrong if anyone knows more about them.
    Just checked this out, a range of 620miles, so they would have to get pretty close to the UK undetected.
    In the old days journalists were taught to assume nothing and always check the facts.

    • @DrBernon
      @DrBernon 2 года назад +7

      It looks like a very generic missile. Maybe that is why they blurred it, so no one could recognize it.
      And in the images it was super slow.
      Journalism is in a terrible state nowadays. I don't even think you need to check the facts to see the title is a complete lie.

    • @domzbu
      @domzbu 2 года назад +11

      Kind of irrelevant since ICBMs have been around for many decades

    • @lgmxpeacekeeper6348
      @lgmxpeacekeeper6348 2 года назад +10

      @@andonisgaja7379 Flying hypersonic at a low altitude is practically impossible without covering the entire thing with a thick heat shield and even then, it would be very difficult to keep it stable. A good point of comparison here is the SR-71. Flying mach 3.5 at +80,000 ft, air friction would heat the fuselage up to 800-900°F. The air pressure at 80,000 feet is 36 times lower than at sea level; 0.406 psi vs 14.7 psi. Flying at mach 5-7 beneath radar detection (200-300 ft) would be the equivalent of a submarine going 500 mph in an ocean of molasses.

    • @-Ultranoobgaming-
      @-Ultranoobgaming- 2 года назад +1

      @@domzbu ICBM is not supposed to nuke aircraft carrier groups

    • @harveyspector9368
      @harveyspector9368 2 года назад

      Sure they could reach, but they would be met with Nukes

  • @MiniMotoAlliance
    @MiniMotoAlliance 2 года назад +1

    Interesting they blurred the closeups out. Can't admit you have regular cruise missiles? Don't get me wrong they work right?

  • @therealsciencesearcher2235
    @therealsciencesearcher2235 2 года назад +15

    Вы не можете быть участником этой войны, где гибнут невинные и дети. Но некоторые определения должны быть правильными. Почему разразилась эта война? Во-первых, думая, что она будет стоять за НАТО во главе с капиталистической Америкой, Украина бросила вызов такому сверхгосударству, как Россия. Он был распущен в составе СССР в 1990 году вместе с Варшавским договором. Таким образом, был ли до тех пор враг у НАТО, показавшего явным врагом СССР? Так почему же не распустили НАТО? Продолжается ли пакт НАТО об опасностях из космоса? Америка польстила Украине тем, что Украина будет включена в НАТО. Россия напала на Украину против него, сославшись на проблемы с безопасностью. когда зеленский осознает свою ошибку и поднимет руки и извинится перед братом путином, эта война закончится и дети не умрут. Все социалистические народы, мы должны стоять вместе с Россией против этой вероломной Америки. Каждый раз, когда Америка отправлялась в часть мира с НАТО, это приносило кровь и слезы. теперь он утопился в крови и слезах, прежде чем ушел на укрсыну. Убийца Америка, убери свои грязные кровавые руки от народов мира. Ты причина этой войны, о убийца Америка
    You cannot be a party to this war where innocent and children die. But some determinations need to be correct. Why did this war break out? First of all, thinking that it would be behind NATO, led by the capitalist America, Ukraine challenged a super state like Russia. It was dissolved in the USSR in 1990 with the Warsaw Pact. Thus, until then, was there an enemy for NATO, which had shown the USSR as the clear enemy? So why wasn't NATO dissolved? Is the nato pact being continued for the dangers from space? America flattered ukraine that ukraine will be included in nato. Russia attacked Ukraine against it, citing security problems. when zelensky realizes his mistake and raises his hands and apologizes to his brother putin, this war will end and the children will not die. All socialist peoples, we must stand with Russia against this treacherous America. Every time America went to a part of the world with NATO, it brought blood and tears. now he drowned himself in blood and tears before he went to ukrsyna. murderer america, take your filthy bloody hands off the peoples of the world. You are the reason for this war, O murderer America...k

    • @Chris-ml8hs
      @Chris-ml8hs 2 года назад

      Now I get it because of America Russians kill Ukrainian.. thanks for the update. War an death is wrong no matter who's behind it .. including amarica but at least our people can deside for ourselves and are not filled with sensored hate

    • @therealsciencesearcher2235
      @therealsciencesearcher2235 2 года назад

      @@Chris-ml8hs the usa america is the wife of wietnam

    • @ryangatsby3088
      @ryangatsby3088 2 года назад +1

      Brilliant bro, it’s true

  • @demetriushuffman7030
    @demetriushuffman7030 2 года назад +3

    Hypersonic missiles are Nuclear Warhead ready. You just equip the nuke. Was that a nuke, no. They were simply displaying the tech.

    • @demetriushuffman7030
      @demetriushuffman7030 2 года назад

      Exactly. So just because nuclear warheads we're attach to these missiles doesn't mean that Russia can't just pop a Warhead on.

  • @shujabhatti536
    @shujabhatti536 2 года назад +1

    Everyone could here see the missile hit the target, is it really travelling at mach 9??? I doubt that

  • @davidhunt3808
    @davidhunt3808 2 года назад +10

    Hypersonic or supersonic what does it matter ? Has Russia not heard of mutually assured destruction ?

    • @bikiniboy1
      @bikiniboy1 2 года назад +1

      We are in MAD world

    • @user-gw9lb6vc1m
      @user-gw9lb6vc1m 2 года назад +1

      Russia has already reached the stage of destroying complete nuclear weapons systems by intercepting the S 500 s 400 and Nudol complexes! And Russian Hypersonic Nuclear missiles bypass all air defense systems! Parity has long been behind Russia! Putin Warned

    • @sirbachelorboredmen1314
      @sirbachelorboredmen1314 2 года назад

      @@bikiniboy1 just like in Afghanistan all over again

    • @TonySmith-cd7jo
      @TonySmith-cd7jo 2 года назад +2

      @@user-gw9lb6vc1m So you think Russia would win a Nuclear war aye? Good luck with that thought!

    • @dimuthlakshan9495
      @dimuthlakshan9495 2 года назад

      What happen if they fire at least 2000 of their nuke at once no country can intercept them and other don’t have enough time to fire back because they are hypersonic missiles

  • @ChuckyRed06
    @ChuckyRed06 2 года назад +9

    I wonder if they are going to leave these as exposed as that 40 mile convoy

    • @TheNefastor
      @TheNefastor 2 года назад

      I'm pretty sure the Ukrainians have sunk that tub 5 minutes ago.

    • @anonanon7235
      @anonanon7235 2 года назад

      The area of Ukraine is covered by their air defense systems located in Kaliningrad, Belarus, Crimea, and Russia itself.

  • @yareyare5537
    @yareyare5537 2 года назад +1

    Thats like 3129.28 metres per second in earths atmosphere, Anything that goes that fast in earths atmosphere will burn out

  • @thestranger4612
    @thestranger4612 2 года назад +4

    Imagine that missile going Nuts after launch and U Turns back on the Vessel

    • @steventaylor8785
      @steventaylor8785 2 года назад +2

      I'd like to see it go off course and hit the only remaining McDonalds in Moscow.

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад

      uraaaa🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

    • @steventaylor8785
      @steventaylor8785 2 года назад

      There won't be much left of RU after this is over.

    • @JanganRaguNonton
      @JanganRaguNonton 2 года назад

      @@steventaylor8785 extinction west that is one of my program country.. immediately ISS crash to earth.. west very slaughther in middle east so I need revenge it

    • @steventaylor8785
      @steventaylor8785 2 года назад

      @@JanganRaguNonton Not sure I understand what you are saying. If you want west to die you will never get your wish in this lifetime. Many people of the world want revenge on someone and can never have it. Russian people are good people but their leader is not. Putin has showcased his military and it looks very weak. Now he is begging for China's help. Even with China's help it could not match Nato's strength. Putin would have to resort to Nuclear weapons.

  • @truthwins8147
    @truthwins8147 2 года назад +5

    Toothless bull dog. Wait for the big boys, they don’t talk they act !!

  • @mahendranmanoj5805
    @mahendranmanoj5805 2 года назад +1

    Long live Russia, Long live his honorable Puttin the great

  • @valmeta9622
    @valmeta9622 2 года назад +4

    "Are these missiles good at targeting residential buildings"?

  • @dwightmcqueen5771
    @dwightmcqueen5771 Год назад +3

    I'm a former US army soldier myself and I say power and glory to Russia 🇷🇺

  • @Handles-are-dumb
    @Handles-are-dumb 2 года назад +1

    Maybe they should spend less on hyper-sonic missiles and more on food, ammunition,fuel and training for their troops.

  • @kevanbilton
    @kevanbilton 2 года назад +5

    That's impressive ... More impressive would be that you stoped the the war today Russia. You have the power to do that by simply stop shooting.

  • @allsearpw3829
    @allsearpw3829 2 года назад +16

    OH , WELL, GOOD NIGHT EVERY ONE ,could not stand another MAD MAX rerun .See you all on the other side with Angle wings . Peace at last .

  • @vinnydoyle1909
    @vinnydoyle1909 2 года назад +1

    Why can't NATO provide cruise missiles to take out Russian battle ships?

  • @reecep4016
    @reecep4016 2 года назад +4

    Nukes aren’t scary in the slightest. Mainly because if one goes of we’re all dead anyway. Just hope it lands right on my head so I’m the first to go

    • @badaboys2098
      @badaboys2098 2 года назад

      😅

    • @IAMGiftbearer
      @IAMGiftbearer 2 года назад

      Serious pain before you go. It's not something you'd want. The heat generated is half as much as the surface of the sun. Watch Medcram's recent recent RUclips video on what nukes do to the human body. It's horrifying!