Warpath 10.1 - Damage vs Firepower, which is best?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июн 2024
- #aceshooter
To get the most out of Warpath, play it on PC at warpath.lilith.com/
iHaveNoMoney.4th channel (Diabloo)
/ @ihavenomoney.4th
Our friends PHOENIX
/ @phoenix-warpath
Ground officer spreadsheet
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/... 
Игры
lol! You made a simple error in the spreadsheet, the 20% firepower buff lost 84 units not 44. So 30% FP buff still beats the 20% one. Check the report again @ 6:42. Would be interesting to see how the 15% dmg compares with the 30% FP’s though and how War machines + 10% fire rate would factor in on that table, just for interest sake. Good to see the hard evidence though, thanks.
No MBT were harmed in the making of this video 🙌
nice video bro🔥
Instead of comparing the absolute values, it might be better to compare the unit and officer damages over time. The spreadsheet you prepared is already very useful and I’m glad creators are finally doing apple to apple comparisons. Very clean and concise video, didn’t need to skip any part!
Edit: Someone in the comment section suggested that the 30% FP does better than the 20% FP when you factor in the input error into the spreadsheet. I second the opinion that we need a comparison with fire rate increase comparisons too.
All my Ground Unit Offis got 1 firepower & 1 damage Trainer. Only Special, Red & Blue Trainers 🤗
I made some calculation, and from my findings there is strong demand on more data, like repeating each run 5 times, to get more consistent data. Especially the +20% Firepower is weird. If you break it down to a dmg/min +20% FP gives you 89% of the unbuffed damage and ~100% of the officer damage. This might be a runaway or an error in the buff or something else. Also the received damage per min is with the +20%FP buff only ~80% of the unbuffed. Could you do that especially for the +20% FP?
Salut, dans le récapitulatif à la fin de la vidéo pour + 20% puissance de feu tu as perdu 84 et non 44 . Merci pour tes vidéos frère du Québec ça aide beaucoup
Could it be possible that the skill being trained also has correlation with the coefficient damage the officer offering the skill gives? For example a 25% fortification damage skill from spanner would be weaker than 25% fortification damage skill from eye of providence?
very useful video but for better relevance you should have done more than 1 test for each situation
the debate is 40% firepower vs 20% damage thats what the players base wanna know , we all know damage is better than firepower pound for pound nice video tho
WHY DIDNT YOU TELL ME
You need to take more data on each battle, then you put everything on a spreadsheet and calcute the media, and that value is way more accurate than just one data for each
You are correct. Those test are time consuming though.
Ótimo vídeo parabéns, várias pessoas estão comentando sobre haver hacker vendendo trapaças no jogo, você pode falar sobre isso ser real ou não,
Mag do you know anything when this new update is coming ? And if there will be any new officer
There will be a MBT and rocket launcher buff.
@@Twon22 ye i know that , do you maybe know date when it comes out?
They change again of normal attack damage... Instead of normal attack DMG. They change to normal attack boost.. any defference of that my 44 mag..have a good day..
How about deff skill?
eso se aplica tambien para las artillerias?
Si
why is having a 20% FP giving you better result than having a 30% FP lol, i don't understand.
maybe effected by critical ratio :D, I guess
Its an error in the spreadsheet, shouldnt be 44 loses, but 84 loses. Still there is something majorly weird in the +20 FP buff from that officer
You forgot pen damage 😭😭😭
Like i thought normal attack dmg boost is still the best if you can't get to skill every time
Both of them are same 😂 the difference is just on a paper 😂