Three Musketeers vs Omnimon Ace - EX-07 Matchplay Commentary

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2025

Комментарии •

  • @veditafri949
    @veditafri949 2 месяца назад +1

    That beel Star sleeves are sick, really wish i could find to buy one

  • @Kazz1187
    @Kazz1187 3 месяца назад +2

    Omnimon ace so spicy with having all the pieces, love to see it

  • @TonyPino18
    @TonyPino18 3 месяца назад +1

    I’m wondering what was the reason to not use Beelstarmon x’ other when digivolving/when attacking effect to trash 2 of your sources to trash the opponent’s security?

  • @starforger13
    @starforger13 3 месяца назад +1

    I swear for some reason on your last few vids I gotta max out the volume just to hear you guys

    • @HyperColosseum
      @HyperColosseum  3 месяца назад

      Sorry about that, from what I’ve seen it seems to be okay but I’ve been doing the editing while Ben’s been on his honeymoon and my audio balancing is different than his. In the future I’ll keep this in mind when I’m editing. - TJ

  • @Remnant51892
    @Remnant51892 3 месяца назад +1

    22:49 miraculous actually adds to hand and plays a tamer and doesn't go to battle when checked in security. That's my mistake lol

  • @amateurishauthor2202
    @amateurishauthor2202 3 месяца назад +1

    19:49 Omni ace is: on play/when digivolving: If DNA digivolving pick one of your opponent's digimon, return it and all of your opponent's digimon that share a level with it to the bottom of the deck, then delete one of your opponent's digimon. So he still clears both Gundra and Magnakiddmon.

    • @damiancarr168
      @damiancarr168 3 месяца назад +1

      Gundra is a omni protect. If a effect targets multiple things Gundra will prevent them all from leaving by trashing 1 source.

    • @PinOytaku
      @PinOytaku 3 месяца назад +1

      ​@@damiancarr168is correct, the protection of gundra works the same as Dominimon

  • @amateurishauthor2202
    @amateurishauthor2202 3 месяца назад

    The Miraculous security effect is play a matt/tai from hand/trash, then add to hand, doesn't go to the play area.

  • @TonyPino18
    @TonyPino18 3 месяца назад

    22:30 around this time the Omni player could have played the Agumon that was just checked in security as it’s in the trash at the time the Miraculous MK’s security effect activated.

  • @aminferwanah5270
    @aminferwanah5270 3 месяца назад +1

    you ever think about the bt7 dorumon as another rookie for three musketeers?

    • @vicentecarrizoza5887
      @vicentecarrizoza5887 3 месяца назад +2

      U can play the Deck using SoC /x antibody engine, pretty safe boss monster such as gundra with 15k or beelstar with 14k

    • @aminferwanah5270
      @aminferwanah5270 3 месяца назад

      @@vicentecarrizoza5887 do any of the other soc’s really work with the deck other than the dorumon though

  • @antwonbilon2281
    @antwonbilon2281 3 месяца назад +2

    send that list arby

    • @HyperColosseum
      @HyperColosseum  3 месяца назад

      Profile will be live tomorrow! - TJ

    • @antwonbilon2281
      @antwonbilon2281 3 месяца назад

      @@HyperColosseum SICK, ill be playing 3M tomorrow at my locals

  • @damiancarr168
    @damiancarr168 3 месяца назад +1

    Heads up but the options cards are not interruptive. Whatever ongoing effect is processing must fully complete before you resolve the options trash effect. This is really important for things like Paladin Ace that strip and bottom deck all in one effect so you will never get their strip effect because they were removed from their trigger location.
    Also and this isnt **super** important but when you do Gundra he actually has to finish his full effect before you resolve the option. The option is "used" but doesnt activate till you complete Gundra's effect. Matters more for old Gundramon(because he trashes the cards) but its a thing.

    • @aminferwanah5270
      @aminferwanah5270 3 месяца назад

      @@damiancarr168 what makes them non interruptive compared to like gundras protection or any others

    • @damiancarr168
      @damiancarr168 3 месяца назад +1

      @@aminferwanah5270 interruptive effects in 99.9% of cases uses the keyword "would", meaning it happens prior to whatever action caused it. If a effect doesn't say "would" as it's activation condition (usually the first line of its effect) then it's not interruptive. There are some super fringe cases that it's not but this card isn't one of them