After learning about quantum entanglement, the Double Slit experiment, and Shroedinger's Cat years ago, I fully believe that the universe itself is conscious even at the quantum level. It seems consciousness is woven into the very fabric of space and I find it incredibly fascinating. We are simply the part of the universe trying to understand itself. Weird. Edit: I didn't expect my comment to be so thought provoking. I'm fascinated by the comments it has inspired.
You mean the universe is a living conscious thing like a human thinks she is? Personally I think our brains must be as entangled as anything else. This would mean that we all are connected via quantum entanglement.
@@TheJonesMcCoy I think it's conscious on some deep level. I mean, photons "know" when they're being observed. The mere act of observing one collapses the wave/particle duality. I wouldn't say the universe is alive like WE'RE alive. Rather, we're the part of the universe that can be considered alive. But yes, the more you learn about quantum entanglement and the behavior of the quantum scale of the universe, the more it seems that there is an underlying consciousness at the quantum and macro level.
@@rosenbaum75 it's not about the photon "knowing" in some mysterious deep way that it's being observed. the collapse of the duality can simply be a reaction to the action of being observed.
A couple of nights ago I dreamed that my eyesight had been completely restored. It felt so real that I actually cried with joy in the dream. In this case, it was waking up that turned out to be the actual nightmare.
@@donaldcarpenter5328 I am blessed. I had emergency eye surgery several months ago, and my doctor literally saved me from going completely blind. I have lost so much, but for that I will be Grateful until my final breath.
@@MrBendybruce my left keg is fckd and many years later I still have those dreams where it’s whole. The last one I was young again running at full gait while playing tag with the wind blowing in my hair. Then randomly “shouldn’t this be hard?” Followed by pain that woke me up. Sorry about your eyes, there’s a blind RUclipsr you should watch! He’s really cool and does a lot of activities you wouldn’t think a blind person can do. He had a similar incident with progressively worsening eyesight. His Channel is the blind surfer Pete
If we are a simulation, than the fact we are here trying to figure that out and who it was that created the program is..... astounding. Imagine playing a video game you created and then one day the characters look at the screen and say, "We know you created us. We've been spending a lot of time researching it to figure it out. We know we are just a simulation and we want to know WHY you put us here." They can't see you, of course, but the jig is up. What do you do? Do you reprogram them? Wipe the drive clean? Cntrl, Alt, Delete? It poses so many questions I can't even begin to think of them all. Truly fascinating.
Or, maybe just a big or here, God just wanted to be us but everyone wants a different image of him so he created images to create his image so his image can finally image himself into life. Just my two cents living on this atom
I think for all those answers you must read a book known as QURAN you can find its English translation so you will know the programmer the author the creator of this game and what the programmer then game creator wants from us
Fun thing to think about. Quantum mechanics are mirrored in the newest video games. See, in order to draw the detailed environments and models without frying the hardware, the game is only rendered in the direction you are looking. Everything outside your field of view doesn't exist. If not being observed, theres nothing solid there. A further funny thought. In video games, you can catch pop-in on objects, or notice NPCs drop in as you rotate the camera if you turn too quickly. Ever turned your head and seen something out of the corner of your eye, but nothing is there? I'm no conspiracy theorist. Just took a good edible, and felt the need to share my weed-wisdom.
@@Volyren questions. What was the highest peak on earth before mount everest was discovered? Was math invented, or discovered? Granted, our brain assembles our unique realities, but our common reality is there wether it's observed or not.
I've been getting pretty good at lucid dreaming, lately. The idea is to somehow realize you are in a dream, and then you can manipulate it at your will. In order to get there, I have to be completely sober, and not tired. It's more of like meditating in my bed until I force my body to go to sleep, but I still have awareness about the room that I'm in. For the first while you think you're still awake, lying in bed trying to go to sleep, but you realize you're dreaming that you're awake and trying to go to sleep. When that realization occurs, you get out of the bed and wander about your dream, doing whatever you like. You can sprint forever without getting tired, you can fly, you can swim underwater forever without having to take a breath. It's an amazing experience.
@@RCShenanigans wow 🤯 really ! I also know about lucid dreaming and i had tried few times but i didn't succeed at all . Can u please guide me or tell me well how to lucid dreaming so I can fly 🕊️ at night 🌃 in the sky wow it's feels amazing even in thinking 🌠🌌🏞️
Shankaracharya, a revered rishi(sage), said this verse in 8th century " Brahma satyam jagat mithya" which means Brahman is the universal truth and the universe we se and live is maaya ( illusion) - it is very complicated to understand but if you give a try by becoming a seeker of truth/knowledge and go deeper searching into subtler and subtler aspects of the physical world, it will slowly reveal to you.
If we ever gave up on the pseudo religion that is other sentient beings existing in the universe, we would be free to explore the true nature of reality. Given the boundaries of our reality, it’s clear only self improving AI can provide us with the superior sentient enlightenment we seek from aliens. We must create our own God, that we can see, that responds to us when we ask it questions we can’t find the answers to without it. We are alone in the reachable universe. But we don’t need to be forever.
@@coder-x7440 If our reality is infinite then so are our minds. Maybe we don't need to create a god. Maybe we are supposed to become gods. Just a theory.
idahoplantguy wrote, _"How bold of us to decide we know what the definition of _*_real_*_ is."_ Scientifically speaking, all knowledge is tentative, right? We craft a hypothesis, test it, and adjust/refine as necessary. Since "real" is an idea, it's tentatively held for as long as some practical utility emerges from the definition hypothesized. When that definition fails in some way, we have to adjust accordingly. Since our awareness & understanding of the quantum way of being is all very emergent (to us), we're sort of 'learning as we go'. As such, I don't think it's *"bold"* of us -- it's just practical utility constantly evaluated over time.
@@sclingebinge8266 No, "real" is that which actually is, independent of observation. Whether a human or some being capable of understanding the term "real" has any ability to determine what is real or not, is a different topic all together.
2 questions/observations: 1. Why/how would Anna "instantly know that Luke's coin should have landed" on the opposite of what she got? Based on what assumption or principle? She could very well suppose that his coin landed on the same side as hers, couldn't she...? 2. The boxes with colored stones inside - if a person is told that the stone inside the box in front of him is either black or white, opens the box and sees a black stone of course he/she would correctly guess what color stone is in the other box immediately. Without needing to receive any "entanglement information". Please explain if I am missing something here.
I caught that too. Plus I don't understand how you could measure the speed of entanglement as faster than the speed of light. A confirmation signal or whatever the case would have to travel back at the speed of light. Correct me if I'm misunderstanding
@@Dingodown Well, they are trying to make the point that quantum entanglement works instantaneously, but I don't agree with the choice of experiments conducted to prove the above. They are flawed in their nature as I have pointed out in my first comment. First one is nonsensical and irrelevant to the subject. And the second one does not need quantum entanglement to occur to be proven correct as well as cannot serve as proof of entanglement itself. If you are informed that you are presented with a choice of 2 boxes with 2 stones of different color in them, it is only logical that if you open a box and see one of those you will correctly guess the color of the stone in the unopened box. Both "experiments" illustrated are nonscientific in their nature and offer nothing to gain on a scientific level.
@@user-1wy8wu01 After jogging my memory a little I get it now and their analogy is actually correct but misses a key understanding. You are supposed to know exactly without a doubt what color of stone is in the other box. They are "entangled". Think of two photons both having an opposite spin. You separate them but they remain entangled. Everything exists in a dual state until observed. (Cat in the box - dead and alive until observed) You measure the spin of one photon and because of entanglement you instantly know the spin of the other and are proven correctly when it is also observed. My very basic understanding in a nutshell.
I thought about this and I think yes they are indeed quite over-simplistic examples just for the sake of understanding the basic idea or concept. But, the point they're trying to make is, when things are quantum entangled for example 2 things that can have a lot of random outcomes, they'd always show sort of an opposite result to one another for the state of which one is observed out of the many random possibilities.
My question is how are you moving one half of the entangled particle halfway across the universe and then observing it ? That's an incredible distance. Wouldn't any signal indicating the condition of that particle take years to return because of the speed of light speed limit ?
Quantum entanglement. The thing that got me, is how the particles in the Double Slit experiment KNEW they were being observed and the experiment was repeated in other labs.
As "Spooky" as it is yeah, but my Question IS > "Quantum Entanglement" for Communication ( A Entanglement=0 , B Entanglement=1 ) then its Binary Code, Thus Communication. Kinda Skipped on this, but will Keep Watching this + Others to "Wrappppppppppppp" My head around it.
The dumbed down version is that the camera used to make the observation is at the same scale as the particle and so it interacts with it. It's the smallest you can go. Like taking a picture of an atom or making transistors at atom scale. When there is no "observation" the camera is not interacting with it at that level and so it fires predictably. When the "camera" is observing, it's at that scale, and so interacts with the particle and creates a field or ripple/wave. Not so spooky.
@@randallwhiteis Albert Einstein colorfully dismissed quantum entanglement-the ability of separated objects to share a condition or state-as “spooky action at a distance.”
It's been said that "when you change the way you view things, the way you view things changes." Regarding your comment, it's been said "when you change the way you view things, the things you view, change."
That's an interesting question 🤔. When I tried mushrooms I felt like my existence meant nothing. Maybe we are the universe which would mean we are nothing since the universe is empty
It doesn't matter if we're in a simulation or not. What if we "wake-up" from this simulation in the "real world"? We could ask again if this is a simulation as well and are left with same questions unanswered.
Not necessarily.... Remember the artifact of light speed. If you woke up in the "base" reality, the proof could be the speed of light perhaps being infinite.
@@wreksangel The "speed" of anything cannot be "infinite". Speed is a measurement. If you are moving instantaneously, you aren't moving at any "speed", you are simply appearing wherever you want.
There is a Creator who created this reality or call it simulation. A creator who programmed this reality. A creator who is outside this universe and not affected by timespace and just watching everything we do. 👌
For me so far, this is the most plausable option for an acceptable basis for meaning in the universe as we seem to know it. For me it begins to suggest a viable causation and understanding to death, suffering, good and bad, success and failure and the meaning of it all.
If all this is an entanglement reality, then to keep the balance, death is birth and vice versa. So our counterpoint can not exist until we do not.. or does he die as well. Seems the Indian Mysticism was on to something.
How the universe moves from predictable to random is in direct relationship to how the mind at any given moment perceives and interacts with its world.
What I'd like to know is how do you know the "entangled" 2nd particle from all the others around it? How do you know this (*) and (*) this is the pair that needs to be measured? Im struggling to explain myself but I want to know how do you differentiate the pair..
I don't care if we're in a simulation or not, it simply does not give an answer to every question we have as there has to be something simulating us, meaning another universe where matter seemingly spawned out of nowhere just like ours? You could argue maybe in their universe, they have the answers, but then it would still be hard to imagine that their universe just "appeared" out of nowhere from matter/energy. ( Just like we can't explain what was there BEFORE the big bang )
Sure, but then it would be good keep asking the same question recursively to know who are the creators of the simulators? In turn, they would also be simulators of some other creators. And this would be endless which is not possible. As mentioned here, it is consciousness.
That's just it, matter does not just appear out of nowhere. One question scientists nor philosophers have never asked is: We are born with bodies only, right? How does anything else get into this third dimension? The answer is that it doesn't, it can't. Now go back and study ancient text that talks about Giants. It's all right there and google earth shows tell-tale signs of Giants all over it, throughout the millions and millions of years it's taken to make the Earth what it is. The Earth was once formless and void, before Giants. Before the war between "gods and men". History repeats over and over. ~Peace~
Before the big bang there was absolute CHAOS manifested through our primitive thoughts that used to be INSTANT manifestations. Big Bang was the beginning of TIME. Time is a slowdown of our primitive thoughts that caused chaos and Time is the only proof of our existence. If time didn’t exist = everything would be fast and everyone would be able to manifest whatever they think about IMMEDIATELY.
My Sunday started off so well, pancakes and orange juice, playing board games with my daughter… I turn on RUclips for 10 minutes and now I’m facing an existential crisis.🤔
Tetrahedrons are strikingly similar, in this videos visualisation, to the polys used in 3d modelling. Gets the imagination going in terms of simulated reality.
The simulation theory sounds so crazy to me like WHO runs this simulation? Are they living in a world like this or Is it completely different? Who says that a computer like theirs would even leave traces? Why would we think that our physical laws or theories apply to the observer‘s world? I feel like if this theory turns out to be true, we‘ll just have more questions than we did before 😅
What sort of dumb thinking is this, how does this prove the cosmos is not real ? The only thing this proves is that phenomena can be influenced by observer and not that nature is not real, who comes with the dumb ideas from a 0 basis ?
@@amark350 If God exist, he isn't some magic man in the sky giving people cancer and burning homos in hell. He's just an asshole using science we can't yet comprehend. You know how they say sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic? Well miracle is just another word for magic.
Pretty sure what they mean is. "We really don't know anything for sure. Still lets throw some random math equations out there. We made it fit the solution we desired."
Quantum physics is very difficult to understand. The results of experiments completely change when someone begins to take measurements. It's almost as if particles "know" they're being measured or observed - kind of like they would if we were living in a simulation.
@@zzanatos2001 It's too early to tell. Quantum physics is still in its infancy. And there is no guarantee that how we understand it today will be anything like we understand it in a century. One can speculate, but there is little in the way of proof to support a simulation theory. Mathematics and logical arguments can be used to support a lot of invalid theories.
*Morpheus* : "What is _real_ ? How do you define _real_ ? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then _real_ is simply electrical signals intepreted by your brain"
Reply to Einstein: What is incomplete is not the theory, what is incomplete is the visible reality. Because it doesn't tell us anything about what is going on in the invisible part.
If the speed of light reveals the limit of the processing speed of the larger simulating computer, then the infinite speed of entangled particle information exchange rules out the simulation theory as it requires the larger computer to be faster than infinitely.... I vote for a conscious universe
Paradoxically it can be one of the possibile explanations. If quantum entanglement is just a special communication chanel between two objects outside of space, then it could be an argument for a simulation, not against. Imagine that you have basic communication grid where the information spreads between nearest objects thus limiting the speed of information from object A to B. But when you establish direct channel between much further objects, from the perspective of simulated being, you'll break maximal speed for the information but not from the point of view of the simulation itself. Space is only simulated. For the computer, any of the objects in memory is easily accessible at any time ignoring your perceived distance.
The speed of light is not arbitrary, and the narrator was incorrect when he said scientists do not understand it. The speed of light represents the time delay between cause and effect, which in 3D is instantaneous, but in 4D spacetime (which is curved) has a small value > 0.
Rather when powered on the computer. There was just pure energy. Than bios and various programs loaded and formed particles- building bloks of reality. Than they started interacting and formed consciousness of the universe which formed other various things and is actively managing the universe.
That's probably not the worst metaphor. I never played the game. Are there irreversible consequences once you find something? If there are, then we are getting close.
I read one commentator say in regards to the simulation theory "If we live in a simulation, my player sucks at video games!" lol... still makes me chuckle today.
Your concept of "god" is only in your mind, which was interpreted by another thus making it a symbol that has been embedded deep within you. Nothing more than an idea to cope with the unknown. Humans have been interpreting and defining what's unknown since becoming aware of their surroundings, only pretending to know the unknown.
3:53 Actually sound is an interpretation of physical/mechanical waves so in reality the tree does create mechanical waves through the air causing vibration but without an interpreter it isn't really "sound"...
Correct, there is no "sound" without a brain to create it because "sound" is an ideation created in a brain. "Sound" did not exist prior to brains harnessing vibrations through a medium for a survival benefit and turning those vibrations into something that could be perceived (using a sensory organ). If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to FEEL it, does it make tactile sensations? No, because a brain (working through sensory organs) is necessary in order to ideate tactile sensations. Tactile sensations are a response to matter and energy, and the matter and energy of the tree falling still happens, still exists, but tactile sensations do not exist unless a brain converts matter and energy inputs into an ideation. Same with sound.
@@niveketihw1897 Agreed. Or as our physics master tried to simplify it for us : "The falling tree causes a pressure wave which is picked up by minute hairs in the ear canal which vibrate and send electrical pulses to the brain which it interprets as sound", or some such, it was over 50 years ago.
@@thomassmith1922 ...I once had a tree at one corner of my house. I walked to the corner to meet the school bus. Arriving home that tree had fallen across the driveway narrowly missing my step. I never heard it fall. But I know it was there. I had to clean up the mess. So was it "real"?
@@besticudcumupwith202 Yes I think its real. But this quantum stuff says its just information that becomes our reality when observed. Its beyond my pay grade though
hey, not sure if this is a valid question or if there's just a lot i haven't understood yet.. but does this work? what if the quantum particles exist in a higher dimension as one particle whose properties are changing when we "create" 2 particles in this dimension. I'm thinking that distance is no longer a factor because in that higher dimension, it still exists as one particle. that way, measurement of the state of one particle immediately determines the state of the other regardless of the distance.. like.. is this something? i'm not well versed in any of this.. i thought it might be worth a comment for discussion
Yes, anything transfering information faster then the speed of light experiences 0 space, so dimensionally speaking its much easier to think of as transitioning through another dimension, or through a 0 dimension, as to the truth of either i'm not sure we actually know the answer or can know as any tests for something would be in thought experiements and probably philosophy currently.
@@gerrybanyard1440that's dumb, because a simulation is supposed to be an exact copy of the original reality to test something safely that we would be able to do originally, that would mean that the speed of light is the same in the original universe we were created in, so that's no an excuse to say we are in a "simulation" also another thing to note down, do you really think we will have the resources to make a simulation EXACTLY like our reality? NO. Humans are fighting wars, natural disasters happen all around the globe, it's dumb to think the simulation theory makes sense because of the speed of light being the limit to how fast information is able to get around our universe, it's stupid. the amount of energy you would need to even power such a simulation that looks indistinguishable from our reality is INSANE. there would be no point to put such resources into such a dumb project, it would be much too expensive, and even if we tried, I would only say that we could get close, but it would never be indistinguishable. Also I doubt you can control how the brain sees and how it expresses feelings so easily by controlling the electrical signals within the brain without damaging the brain. The chance that we are in a simulation is not even close to 50/50, ITS MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH lower when you take these viewpoints into account.
8:23 "We would not be able to notice any glitches." I find this line extremely interesting. It actually would make quite a bit of sense if reality was a simulated one. A great example of a glitch would be the following: In 2019 I got into a really bad motorcycle accident. During the process of flying through the air, I experienced a "Slowdown" to almost a frame by frame state. Mind you, this took seconds to occur. This is a re-occurring theme across many individuals who have experienced traumatic events such as these where everything slows down. It could just be adrenaline, however, this would mean the body would have to find the threat, react accordingly, and have that reaction be basically instantaneous. The likelihood of reality rebuilding itself for the individual experiencing the simulation in a situation such as this seems pretty likely. Especially if it wasn't a "planned" event, or "destiny". This would mean reality would have to essentially in an instant rebuild an entire future for that individual path. Many who have spent years in a monk's temple meditating, or even those who have experimented with natural plants that alter consciousness have come back with the same collective messaging. 1). We, and everything that lives are connected, we are one. 2). The universe is alive, and it is experiencing itself through us. 3). The purpose of life is experience, and to learn how to love with indifference. One can even make the argument that this "Source" is what original nomadic civilizations may have called God. The very first religion ever created was the belief that everything has a soul or a spirit, and this seems to be not too far off from what we are discovering today. I believe at the end of this journey with what we call physicality, your placement and where you go will be determined on your own pre-defined belief system or lack thereof. If you believe only 144,000 people will go to heaven and the rest will burn and you subconsciously find or deem yourself unworthy, you place yourself in that punishment. Whereas if you do well, help others, and vibrate at a higher state for the majority of your time here in servitude and kindness to others, you will find a more welcoming place after this life.
Time stood still when I had an accident, I didn't dare lift my head because I would die if I did. But looking at the windscreen I saw every crack occurring. It took less than seconds but to me it took an eternity and I was literally hanging on to life
We are able to perceive reality through our 5 senses. However, consciousness may ultimately not be limited by physical senses. Therefore, it is not possible due to our physical limitations to fully comprehend consciousness or reality.
@@7BDAC Ramifications of reality.. Or maybe your brain worked slower as it was trying to figure out what was happening.. You know in everyday issues we take everything for granted and don't examine every second of our experiences. There lies the difference between known and unknown instances.
Didn't expect the ideas on emergence theory from Klee Irwin and his team at Quantum Gravity Research to show up in the middle of this video but Im delighted it did. Im a layman fan of them and Garrett Lisi's work with the E8 Lie group.
Check "The Japanese water experiment!". Water molecules changes form when it is exposed to positive and negative emotions. This is proof of how we send out different vibrations depending on whether they are positive or negative emotions.
2:22 -“pairs connected -entanglement” means phenomenon that should not occur due to the “laws” of physics can occur because somewhere else those laws are void. The behavior is determined regardless of the space the “object” is contained within
Some of the assumptions, theories, and conclusions mentioned just make me shake my head. When we ask about "real", what are we comparing it to? If there are multiple levels of simulations going on, only the top most level would be "real", but any conscious entities in that level would also wonder if they were the top level or not. Bottom line, our mind and senses can only get us so far in understanding.
If this is a simulation, then my question is who's running it, and what answer is this simulation supposed to produce for them? More importantly what does that make us?
Im more curious about what kind of beings are running us, and how are they so sure they're no simulations themselves... Which makes it a pointless thing to ponder on for me.
Have you ever driven a long distance and hear your radio station losing signal? Sometimes you even hear another radio station coming in. You can partially hear both for a brief period of time. I’ve always wondered gleefully…Are ghosts and other paranormal phenomena simply distortions in parallel realities?
It can't be. Why would their first instinct would be to harm us if they are from a parallel universe ? Also, why would only living things distort and not other life less objects?
Didn't learn anything.The video says the universe isn't real and then the next line goes, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, slow claps
In the quran, God says over and over "this world is not real", "this world is an ILLUSION" "you think it's real but it's not" "this world is a test" "Reality begins on judgment day" I am not preaching just stating what Muslims have understood for 1,400 years, but science is finally catching up.
Imagine a character in a video game, given consciousness to understand it's surroundings defined by the video game... but trying to understand beyond the program itself and then the hardware beyond it. A simulation within a simulation
*"A simulation within a simulation"* No. As you said at the beginning.. "Imagine a character.." That would be a virtual distinct character for a computer program (AI), the rest of your comment would describe what an AI will be expected/understood to follow up with.
Really hard for a common person like me to know if it is reality or sim, I mean I grew up in a poor country and grew up poor. I saw wealth in the hands of other's it's like luck is always stacked against me, but sometimes everything I predict comes true, like a part of the brain causes perceived reality to warp to it. If it is a sim our brain holds the only key to break out and experience what is real
I think that’s superstitious to say that a part of the brain can warp reality and effect the probability of an outcome unless you’re Wanda Maximoff. It’s more likely that it’s simply by chance that something happened and that you were logically able to determine which event is more likely to happen based on what you know. While it is interesting to theoretically consider if anything is even real, I don’t think it does someone any good. As far as we know, we only live once. The best thing you can do for yourself is just try and enjoy your life.
If your in a simulation your brain is part of that simulation. Your brain may not actually exist outside of it. Furthermore laws of physics can be completely different in whichever reality is simulating ours, so I find it kind of illogical to try and prove we live in a simulation using the science that lives within it.
Yeah, we - human beings - must try everything! Not because it makes sense, but just because we CAN. And because we need to know what happens. We are not very good at forseeing consequences. 😮
How do you suppose we do that oh wait I got an idea!!! We look for a door open it than find the wires or outlet that plugs us in and cut it maybe lights will go out!! But than we just killed billions of simulated characters and committed suicide at the same time but I'm game let's try!!!!
There can be any one of these two purposes behind the creation of this simulated world by an external observer: 1) to harness energy 2) for entertainment
I think there's no purpose at all When there's a creator, there exists creation. Just as the sun has no choice but to shine and dispel darkness, it cannot coexist with darkness in the same room. A creator and the absence of creation cannot coexist.
The way how latent spaces work inside an ai image generator (which are higher dimentional mathematical constructs), feels as an uncanny analogue of how higher dimentional crystals seem to work on projecting reality.
@@krishnamohanyerrabilli4040 I don’t believe none of is. I believe that we’re extremely important to the universe and that the universe was the creation of something. Not sure if it’s god or anything but something caused the Big Bang and the vast expansion of the universe. We humans are a very intelligent species and our planet has about everything think about it. We have science we have plants, fish, mammals, insects, ect. We have plants that have the ability to ALTER our own reality and see and feel things our minds can’t and reach us more about our selfs and our reality. Is it a coincidence that we humans live in such a beautiful and stable planet with all these resources that we don’t see as strange but clearly are. In a way if we possess consciousness and we’re able to observe and study the universe and we are a product of the universe. Doesn’t that mean the universe has consciousness?
@@notsure8066 exactly. God wants to prevent real suffer by doing a simulation of our biology first. He wasn’t sure where it goes because he gave his simulated beings free will. Now he sees that many children suffer despite not having done anything wrong. This makes him doubt if he should use our greedy biology when he creates the unsimulated/real reality.
@@krishnamohanyerrabilli4040yep and when we learn to go to other solar systems ( other organs , cells, it is the cancer spreading. Of course the being could throw some asteroids at us to kill the cancer , of course we could learn how to beat those asteroids). Basically it’s us against the being we are living in. Since we are cancer , as weird as this may sound , I’m rooting for us. We are cancer , we are just trying to survive. It’s not our fault. If it’s in our dna to be cancer then cancer is all we can be. We can want to be different. But if it’s our dna then we can’t help it. We are programmed that way. Of course if the being dies so do we , but I see no reasons n why we shouldn’t live as long as we can . We need to do the best that we live as long as possible. And when our local sun dies in a few billion years we will too if we don’t figure out how to move to a different organ in this beings body.
How does Anna know Lukes's coin is landed opposite of hers? They were two different coins. It literally says the results are random, but then goes on to say that Anna knows what side Luke's landed on.
I was thinking exactly the same thing I think it's funny how he seemed so sure of it to where I even thought he knew of some experiment to prove or something then goes on to say that particals cannot be predicted when messured I'm pretty sure that would count as messuring so there for she wouldn't know I was looking at Hella comments your the only one that caught this ... this tells me they don't know shit still lol
That’s a bad example. There are properties like spin of particle pairs that have to be opposite to from one to the second one. That is what is being measured and the information about those states of spin travels instantaneously- infinity faster than speed of light. That’s what he’s talking about that it was verified over distance in Headron Colider
@@JohnyBravo44 Yes but that information is determined at the moment of the objects' time of separation. They aren't in constant communication with one another over lightyears. It's just remembered information.
@@RCShenanigans My understanding is that the coins represent two entangled particles behaving in an opposite manner to one another. So if you did this with two random coins then they could both land on heads or do essentially whatever they want. The coin is an analogy. So if Anna and Luke were light years apart and both received one of the entangled pair each, they would be able to observe the properties of their own particle and immediately know the properties of the other. The coin analogy just helps break it down for dull minds like my own.
This is one of the most interesting videos I have seen on this channel. Here’s a thought: If we are living in a simulation, do we really have free will? Or is it possible we are given the illusion of free will in order to keep the chaos down? Are we just characters in a game, oblivious to our “user” like TRON, or can we determine our own fate, regardless of the simulation we may, or may not, exist in? Also, if we were to go from atom to molecule to crystal, tetrahedron, etc. to the human brain, my belief is that knowledge is exponential Al and it will not take 100 years, but 30.
As someone who has a background in Physics, I always went along with the accepted point that the randomness within a quantum entangled system prevents FTL communications. I recently read a book 'Cracking the Cosmic Code' which actually shows that the randomness is not a restriction at all. It now opens up the distinct possibilities of FTL communications.
So, were in an 8D universe but can only understand and or interact in 4D if the tetrahedron theory is correct? Honestly as a gamer it isn't hard for me to imagine this is all a simulation. Eventually the simulation gets smart enough to make simulations and when they are smart enough to make consciousness they continue the cycle, like a God.
Precisely. Theoretically speaking, each dimension of reality that precedes the next is more “boring” than the other. Chances are the reality creator programs what cannot be achieved in theirs. Elon Musk made a great point about how at base level we are essentially doing this with video games
Our behaviours are like a computer programmed by different softwares, everything good or bad one has experienced since birth is recorded in the brain as if they're different softwares and many reactions stem from them
What sort of dumb thinking is this, how does this prove the cosmos is not real ? The only thing this proves is that phenomena can be influenced by observer and not that nature is not real, who comes with the dumb ideas from a 0 basis ?
Because (insert whatever you want here). Haha. I like the idea of our knowledge being like a small island, and everything beyond the island is unknown. I get tired of anyone who speaks in absolutes. Throughout history, what we "know" changes/evolves.
Interesting to think about is the only thing im sure about tho :) been thinking that we might are the universe simulation itself thru our consciousness, something in that path.. (soz not native eng)
We building another “simulation” where its gonna become a reality, then they are gonna try to build another simulation based on the “simulation” and thats where multiple realities start to happened… but who started the first reality?
This is clearly stated and explained in our Bhagavata purana, markhandeya purana, yoga vasishta books...... Many more are there in our upanishad books. Our olden days saints/Gurus/Rishi munis knew and they taught this to their students and the knowledge was transferred through communication and memory as they were not having equipments to document these. Later they started documenting and now many are available to read, understand and get to know. Great explanation are given in Garuda Purana as well...... Many books you can get to understand these concepts easily. (Must read only from olden days' Sanskrit converted books - ancient scholars name will be specified)
It's easy to prove that our brain creates different colors out of different wavelengths of light. It turns out that our brain creates everything like that out everything because everything is waves.
I am Indian According to Hindu cosmology our ancient saints and sages predicted that our existing universe is dual in nature it exists both in material and non material To our material sence it appears as material world To our spritual sence it is as conciousness Our universe doesn't exist is wrong Science cannot prove God in the laboratory but we can perceive it with our own spiritual sense only
Could quantum entanglement be a connection through a wormhole? Is it possible to create quantum-sized wormholes? If possible, quantum entanglement doesn't violate locality.
I'm not very versed in this subject but an entangled particle shouldn't necessarily be subject to if we see it right? It reminds me of Schrödinger's cat, even though we don't know the answer the cat is definitely either dead or alive. Just because we can't tell something doesn't mean its existence is relative to us. Sounds kinda self-absorbed ngl. Correct my errors though, because maybe I'm misunderstanding.
All we need is possibility, experiment and probability. If something is possible mathematically, we need to experiment with some hypothesis. And the probability shows the result.
"It’ll be gratifying for sure that praising yellow school busses will achieve the desired results of spicy kimchi-flavored ramen that has been a hub for agricultural growth for thousands of years, despite the antisymmetry feature of fermionic wave functions in the vacuum of space pretending that everything is just fine. There is an additional algebraic structure of superfluid liquids that demonstrates the importance of critical thinking forming potato salad, which helps more than you could know. Get your skeptical head out of the ground. The facts are very simple that karate tournaments cause a build up of differentials in freshly mowed grass and the angular momentum of rubber duckies. Surprisingly, there are no exhaustive studies on this yet. I ask this of every single one of you on this planet to not forget ice cream with activated charcoal. Although, if you speak to anyone about this, you just get shrugged shoulders and blank looks. Therein lies the problem. Remember that facilitating honest discussions about rubber duckies will open the floodgates for pumpkin pecan waffles rich in stellar nuclear synthesis." ---Albert Einstein
The answer is obvious - they are connected or the same via and underlying ‘field’ or alternative dimension… Ahh, just got to the part about quasi crystals… yup, something like that.. :/)
The particles share an environment, and they may be programmed by their environment making them look like the math. Modern science is most certainly myopically dancing around math and missing some mechanism to nature. No one is responsible for what they think they know. It is ONLY what they were taught. No one questions what they were taught. The effect of the double slit may be caused by the slits. Inertia, charge, and gravity may have more in common than you think, but it wasn't TAUGHT to you, so WE'RE SCREWED!
@@nunyafunyuns It doesn't look like anything. They describe it with math as soon as they can, then they derive cause from THAT hasty math. That is why cause, to them, is laws and mnemonic devices. The conservation of angular momentum and the right-hand rule are not causal to a gyro. Look at my latest gyro video. You will see what CAUSE looks like. This is basic mechanics misrepresented by math, it's not light or an atomic nucleus. It's in your face.
" No one questions what they were taught." Ummmm..... Well actually a lot of people do question. That is why we discover things like quantum mechanics, or even simple things like plate tectonics.
So, I live in a simulation as a dimensional time traveler. I once told my mom that I was sent here to help you and to protect you. I also saw her from the universe as a floated or hovered about earth. I could hear her crying. As I had a voice from one of the gods yell me. Do you want to meet her, help her? Has I was thinking I Said, yes, then I was sucked in by the speed of light towards her." I talked to my mom when I was a child, and I told her about me being a reincarnated soul and that I lived different lives before this one. Has I got older, I told her about me being in a simulation and that the rest of our family lives on earth, not in a simulation. That is a way to keep my consciousness in Tack. That we talked about when she passes away I hope she goes to heaven along with the rest of my family, as I told her, once that happens I get to wake up in my other life, back home. The day she mystery passed away , that day , I Said, you gave me a wonderful life, life that is incredible and rememble and maybe I cane into your life has a glish as an interruption because you lost your way in your 20s and lost hope and love. I'm glad you got that back, as she hugged me she Said , I will always think and watch you, you made me believe in the afterlife in ways I didn't before and every one has their last days, last minutes to enjoy life. I'll find you when you wake up from this simulation you say you are in with me. I said that not all humans are in a simulation, just a few like me. You see after she left my bed, I woke up and had an out of body near death experience and I saw my mom enter the gates of heaven and it was beyond any programming any Ai could dream up in a generator. I say that because many people who run the simulations , don't think heaven is real, they think they will always be transferred to other pary of a more realistic upgraded a more advanced consciousness of living buy in a way they are bond to an ai generator and can't wake out of it because they didn't do there missions. As for me , I did all I promised my mom I would do, and I got the ultimate gift to remember her forever. As of right now , my mom and I communicate through a frequency that she can tap into heaven to me as I live on earth. Because she once Said, she's a hard-working woman, and she will choose to work in the afterlife to always help me. But , let's say I wake up from this simulation and I did all my levels of consciousness, will my mom be a memory of a real human or a dignity enhance person that went beyond a synthetic human. To me, I'm stuck between a simulation and me time traveling to earth, literally from a different world. I know what home looks like, not what is behind the gates of heaven, but I've experienced the outer pockets of heaven with portals with the spirit world. If I'm in a simulation, i wonder if I showed my ai generator things they couldn't program and I wrny beyond physics. I've seen glishes in my life but did my parents when they were here on earth. They told me things.
Not sure if it's a glitch, but there have been random times, when I've experienced moments of "loss of identity/ identity crisis." In those few seconds/ minutes, I actually forgot who I am and it was freaky. I had to gather myself quickly otherwise I would have got completely lost into that zone. I think there would be others who might have had similar experiences. What do you think?
Imagine if we are being stimulated.The only way to look beyond the surface is consciousness...and it is the most fundamental way to interact with the universe.This is where enlightenment of the monks proven to be true ...they have surpassed the stimulation thing and realised the ultimate truth.."why we are here"...
Everyone is living in their own simulation, which our five senses make it real. .We are seeking an answer from outside, which never be found, but definitely can find it from the inside.Coz our own mind is the architect of this reality.
Every healthy brain obviously builds a nearly identical model of reality from the incoming senses, as the other members of that species. We each make our own simulation, but they are almost identical ones, as we share nearly identical hardware. If the simulation gets very far off from average, we call the owner of that simulation insane or criminal or naive at best.
Idk when i think about the subject of oneness, in my opinion i think maybe the two still exist.. Everyone and The one are both correct, when i try and understand what is meant by we are one and not separate from one..maybe its because we are all separate parts of the whole of something bigger than us which we perceive as the earth. Just the same way our cells within our body are separate parts of a whole, which is perceived as a human. And maybe the way our body systems work together to keep us alive, we are supposed to work together as one to keep the earth and everything within it alive and functional. If we weren't seperated by borders and manmade structures all of mankind would be able to roam freely. Its hard to understand why countries fight for land and such when this earth is so vast that there should be enough land for everyone.❤ So until we reach that peace and harmony amongst one another to be a fully functional system for the planet, we haven't reached the goal of oneness yet. Yes we can say we are one by ourselves. But one alone is not as powerful as the whole would be
I have asked myself as well if we were living in a simulation and I have watched a few videos already. I found a conclusion of one youTuber, called „The Why files“ very profound: Believing in god or the simulation, what‘s the difference? I thought that was the best answer to that question. I both cases, we are talking about a creator or multiple creators. And I had profound thoughts about those theories ( god and simulation theory ) and I come to this conclusion: The question still remains, when we were created, were do our creators come from? How does their universe look like and does it follow any laws of nature and probably yes, so which and how would they differ from ours? And still: Where does that come from and why does anything in our universe and the potential universe of its creator*s exist at all?
It's not that the Universe isn't real. It's that the 'observable' Universe is not what it appears to be to our limited, finite human brains. All things are revealed on the other side of the veil. Love and Light to all.
Consciousness serves a crucial purpose: intense feedback. Any conscious creature would be immediately motivated to act to preserve itself as it receives experiences of danger and opportunity. Zombies wouldn't.
"We will show them Our signs in the universe and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that this ˹Quran˺ is the truth. Is it not enough that your Lord is a Witness over all things? " *Surah Fussilat, 41-53, Al-Quran*
After learning about quantum entanglement, the Double Slit experiment, and Shroedinger's Cat years ago, I fully believe that the universe itself is conscious even at the quantum level. It seems consciousness is woven into the very fabric of space and I find it incredibly fascinating. We are simply the part of the universe trying to understand itself. Weird.
Edit: I didn't expect my comment to be so thought provoking. I'm fascinated by the comments it has inspired.
The universe is a dumb bitch who took my dog when we broke up then. :d
You mean the universe is a living conscious thing like a human thinks she is? Personally I think our brains must be as entangled as anything else. This would mean that we all are connected via quantum entanglement.
@@TheJonesMcCoy I think it's conscious on some deep level. I mean, photons "know" when they're being observed. The mere act of observing one collapses the wave/particle duality. I wouldn't say the universe is alive like WE'RE alive. Rather, we're the part of the universe that can be considered alive. But yes, the more you learn about quantum entanglement and the behavior of the quantum scale of the universe, the more it seems that there is an underlying consciousness at the quantum and macro level.
@@rosenbaum75 it's not about the photon "knowing" in some mysterious deep way that it's being observed. the collapse of the duality can simply be a reaction to the action of being observed.
Far out dude.😮
If the universe isn't REAL, DID THEY REALLY WIN THE NOBEL PRIZE?
😄😄😃😀😆😁🤣😁😄
Haha. Thats funny. They won a simulated Nobel Prize... obviously
@@Yung_Wicklove In an alternative multi verse, they are chemists in a Drug Cartel meth lab.
@Reno Pro I just looked up who started the Nobel Prize. It was a rich guy passing money to the scientist homies. I’m an engineer so I get it lol
@Boco Corwin No MEANING? I hope your sentence has meaning.
A couple of nights ago I dreamed that my eyesight had been completely restored. It felt so real that I actually cried with joy in the dream. In this case, it was waking up that turned out to be the actual nightmare.
You could also reverse it and state that the dream was the nightmare, if someone gives you false hopes and shatter them .... do you blame yourself?
It's all depends on the perspective where you see the glass half full or half empty. Also it depends on how you define the norm.
bummer. but, now you KNOW you won't be blind for eternity.....
@@donaldcarpenter5328 I am blessed. I had emergency eye surgery several months ago, and my doctor literally saved me from going completely blind. I have lost so much, but for that I will be Grateful until my final breath.
@@MrBendybruce my left keg is fckd and many years later I still have those dreams where it’s whole.
The last one I was young again running at full gait while playing tag with the wind blowing in my hair. Then randomly “shouldn’t this be hard?” Followed by pain that woke me up.
Sorry about your eyes, there’s a blind RUclipsr you should watch! He’s really cool and does a lot of activities you wouldn’t think a blind person can do. He had a similar incident with progressively worsening eyesight. His Channel is the blind surfer Pete
If we are a simulation, than the fact we are here trying to figure that out and who it was that created the program is..... astounding.
Imagine playing a video game you created and then one day the characters look at the screen and say, "We know you created us. We've been spending a lot of time researching it to figure it out. We know we are just a simulation and we want to know WHY you put us here." They can't see you, of course, but the jig is up. What do you do?
Do you reprogram them? Wipe the drive clean? Cntrl, Alt, Delete? It poses so many questions I can't even begin to think of them all. Truly fascinating.
What if the game conceals a hidden power intended for characters and NPCs to discover their creator, making it the central goal of the game?
Or, maybe just a big or here, God just wanted to be us but everyone wants a different image of him so he created images to create his image so his image can finally image himself into life.
Just my two cents living on this atom
I think for all those answers you must read a book known as QURAN you can find its English translation so you will know the programmer the author the creator of this game and what the programmer then game creator wants from us
If I was the creator
I would embrace them
My creations.
This is not a simulation or game this is reality @@Ram_The_Infinite
This stems back to "You create your own reality" on so many levels.
*6 senses not 5, but just wait quantum physics will catch up to that also 😉
Fun thing to think about. Quantum mechanics are mirrored in the newest video games. See, in order to draw the detailed environments and models without frying the hardware, the game is only rendered in the direction you are looking. Everything outside your field of view doesn't exist. If not being observed, theres nothing solid there.
A further funny thought. In video games, you can catch pop-in on objects, or notice NPCs drop in as you rotate the camera if you turn too quickly.
Ever turned your head and seen something out of the corner of your eye, but nothing is there?
I'm no conspiracy theorist. Just took a good edible, and felt the need to share my weed-wisdom.
Until we try to defy gravity...
"I believe I can fly"...
Then the fools jump and die...
@@zanicar4087 every time when I fart I actually fly…. Can’t wait for this simulations next update !!!
@@Volyren questions. What was the highest peak on earth before mount everest was discovered? Was math invented, or discovered? Granted, our brain assembles our unique realities, but our common reality is there wether it's observed or not.
Ever had a dream where in the moment it makes so much sense, but when you wake up it suddenly made no sense what happened...
y
Yep, many times. And often times, my dreams are far more interesting than my real life. Wnenever I fall asleep, I go to a parallel universe.
absolutely.....I remember the last small part of a dream ..and its nuts...
I've been getting pretty good at lucid dreaming, lately. The idea is to somehow realize you are in a dream, and then you can manipulate it at your will. In order to get there, I have to be completely sober, and not tired. It's more of like meditating in my bed until I force my body to go to sleep, but I still have awareness about the room that I'm in. For the first while you think you're still awake, lying in bed trying to go to sleep, but you realize you're dreaming that you're awake and trying to go to sleep. When that realization occurs, you get out of the bed and wander about your dream, doing whatever you like. You can sprint forever without getting tired, you can fly, you can swim underwater forever without having to take a breath. It's an amazing experience.
Dreams are always like that bruh
@@RCShenanigans wow 🤯 really ! I also know about lucid dreaming and i had tried few times but i didn't succeed at all . Can u please guide me or tell me well how to lucid dreaming so I can fly 🕊️ at night 🌃 in the sky wow it's feels amazing even in thinking 🌠🌌🏞️
If there is nothing more real than a simulation, then the simulation is as real as reality gets.
I don't think that's how it works bro 💀
Finally somebody with I can agree.
Shankaracharya, a revered rishi(sage), said this verse in 8th century " Brahma satyam jagat mithya" which means Brahman is the universal truth and the universe we se and live is maaya ( illusion) - it is very complicated to understand but if you give a try by becoming a seeker of truth/knowledge and go deeper searching into subtler and subtler aspects of the physical world, it will slowly reveal to you.
We suddenly woke up in this place and we've been wondering what the hell is going on ever since.
If we ever gave up on the pseudo religion that is other sentient beings existing in the universe, we would be free to explore the true nature of reality. Given the boundaries of our reality, it’s clear only self improving AI can provide us with the superior sentient enlightenment we seek from aliens. We must create our own God, that we can see, that responds to us when we ask it questions we can’t find the answers to without it. We are alone in the reachable universe. But we don’t need to be forever.
If you woke up, you wouldn’t be wondering.
@@coder-x7440 well said dude. Never thought about AI that way
@JesusLovesMe But how is this even related to crimes?
@@coder-x7440 If our reality is infinite then so are our minds. Maybe we don't need to create a god. Maybe we are supposed to become gods. Just a theory.
How bold of us to decide we know what the definition of _real_ is.
Real = provable to a human or being that can understand the meaning of the word "real"
@@sclingebinge8266 and who came up with that term? Hoomans
idahoplantguy wrote, _"How bold of us to decide we know what the definition of _*_real_*_ is."_
Scientifically speaking, all knowledge is tentative, right? We craft a hypothesis, test it, and adjust/refine as necessary. Since "real" is an idea, it's tentatively held for as long as some practical utility emerges from the definition hypothesized. When that definition fails in some way, we have to adjust accordingly. Since our awareness & understanding of the quantum way of being is all very emergent (to us), we're sort of 'learning as we go'. As such, I don't think it's *"bold"* of us -- it's just practical utility constantly evaluated over time.
@@sclingebinge8266 No, "real" is that which actually is, independent of observation. Whether a human or some being capable of understanding the term "real" has any ability to determine what is real or not, is a different topic all together.
@@somersetcace1
But wait...
Doesn't quantum theory say that "is" isn't before observation???
2 questions/observations:
1. Why/how would Anna "instantly know that Luke's coin should have landed" on the opposite of what she got? Based on what assumption or principle? She could very well suppose that his coin landed on the same side as hers, couldn't she...?
2. The boxes with colored stones inside - if a person is told that the stone inside the box in front of him is either black or white, opens the box and sees a black stone of course he/she would correctly guess what color stone is in the other box immediately. Without needing to receive any "entanglement information". Please explain if I am missing something here.
I caught that too. Plus I don't understand how you could measure the speed of entanglement as faster than the speed of light. A confirmation signal or whatever the case would have to travel back at the speed of light. Correct me if I'm misunderstanding
@@Dingodown Well, they are trying to make the point that quantum entanglement works instantaneously, but I don't agree with the choice of experiments conducted to prove the above.
They are flawed in their nature as I have pointed out in my first comment.
First one is nonsensical and irrelevant to the subject. And the second one does not need quantum entanglement to occur to be proven correct as well as cannot serve as proof of entanglement itself. If you are informed that you are presented with a choice of 2 boxes with 2 stones of different color in them, it is only logical that if you open a box and see one of those you will correctly guess the color of the stone in the unopened box.
Both "experiments" illustrated are nonscientific in their nature and offer nothing to gain on a scientific level.
@@user-1wy8wu01 After jogging my memory a little I get it now and their analogy is actually correct but misses a key understanding. You are supposed to know exactly without a doubt what color of stone is in the other box. They are "entangled". Think of two photons both having an opposite spin. You separate them but they remain entangled. Everything exists in a dual state until observed. (Cat in the box - dead and alive until observed) You measure the spin of one photon and because of entanglement you instantly know the spin of the other and are proven correctly when it is also observed. My very basic understanding in a nutshell.
I thought about this and I think yes they are indeed quite over-simplistic examples just for the sake of understanding the basic idea or concept. But, the point they're trying to make is, when things are quantum entangled for example 2 things that can have a lot of random outcomes, they'd always show sort of an opposite result to one another for the state of which one is observed out of the many random possibilities.
My question is how are you moving one half of the entangled particle halfway across the universe and then observing it ? That's an incredible distance. Wouldn't any signal indicating the condition of that particle take years to return because of the speed of light speed limit ?
Quantum entanglement. The thing that got me, is how the particles in the Double Slit experiment KNEW they were being observed and the experiment was repeated in other labs.
As "Spooky" as it is yeah, but my Question IS > "Quantum Entanglement" for Communication ( A Entanglement=0 , B Entanglement=1 ) then its Binary Code, Thus Communication.
Kinda Skipped on this, but will Keep Watching this + Others to "Wrappppppppppppp" My head around it.
The dumbed down version is that the camera used to make the observation is at the same scale as the particle and so it interacts with it. It's the smallest you can go. Like taking a picture of an atom or making transistors at atom scale. When there is no "observation" the camera is not interacting with it at that level and so it fires predictably. When the "camera" is observing, it's at that scale, and so interacts with the particle and creates a field or ripple/wave. Not so spooky.
@@randallwhiteis Albert Einstein colorfully dismissed quantum entanglement-the ability of separated objects to share a condition or state-as “spooky action at a distance.”
It's been said that "when you change the way you view things, the way you view things changes." Regarding your comment, it's been said "when you change the way you view things, the things you view, change."
@@SAVAGESUN "If you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change." -Wayne Dyer
This might sound odd, but could we be the universe observing itself thru our consciousness?
This seems like a question that an ambiguously gnostic person who practices rituals would ask. Mind over matter and all that.
@Gary Gunsanger Not at all. The implications are powerful to say the least. Unless you don't think people can change considerably.
@Gary Gunsanger what a stupid boring comment
That's an interesting question 🤔. When I tried mushrooms I felt like my existence meant nothing. Maybe we are the universe which would mean we are nothing since the universe is empty
@@gamestuff8174 did you consume magic mushrooms?
This theory has never failed to send shivers down my spine
Same here. Up to my crown.
@@infatum9 What crown?
@@watchandplaywithmereaction9930 crown of the head or top of tbe head. I have tingles that travel up the spine and finish at crown location.
@@infatum9 That... Kinda makes sense? At the same time not
@@infatum9 Could you repeat in a phrase that I understand?
scientists will literally award each other for proving the universe isn't real instead of admitting they are wrong
How they r wrong ? R a scientist too?
which isn't problem, because they're correct
It doesn't matter if we're in a simulation or not. What if we "wake-up" from this simulation in the "real world"? We could ask again if this is a simulation as well and are left with same questions unanswered.
Not necessarily.... Remember the artifact of light speed. If you woke up in the "base" reality, the proof could be the speed of light perhaps being infinite.
What if these higher beings you could find past this simulation have the answers to the REAL universe
@@wreksangel
The "speed" of anything cannot be "infinite".
Speed is a measurement. If you are moving instantaneously, you aren't moving at any "speed", you are simply appearing wherever you want.
What if in that reality you have a power, and here being human is just a punishment.
Ahh, the type of thoughts that comes out when sh*tting.
Depends on the kind of reality we would wake up into though, right?
There is a Creator who created this reality or call it simulation. A creator who programmed this reality. A creator who is outside this universe and not affected by timespace and just watching everything we do. 👌
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
true
Yes and i revealed his easter eggs in my 2nd video 😎
Creator is truly too big..
For me so far, this is the most plausable option for an acceptable basis for meaning in the universe as we seem to know it. For me it begins to suggest a viable causation and understanding to death, suffering, good and bad, success and failure and the meaning of it all.
If all this is an entanglement reality, then to keep the balance, death is birth and vice versa. So our counterpoint can not exist until we do not.. or does he die as well. Seems the Indian Mysticism was on to something.
In simple words; Where the limit of Man ends, the limit of God starts..
How the universe moves from predictable to random is in direct relationship to how the mind at any given moment perceives and interacts with its world.
"There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle," - Albert Einstein
@@giladvladpinker5849 Thank you Albert for your thought.
Quantum entanglement is mind blowing. It tells us how little we know about what the fundamental building blocks of our world (of us) actually are.
😊
Please explore the Electric Universe Theory. It makes a hell of a lot more sense than this quantum entanglement fairytale
but still we eagerly admit that its all accident
Consciousness
And don't forget all the Guess work involved.....
What I'd like to know is how do you know the "entangled" 2nd particle from all the others around it? How do you know this (*) and (*) this is the pair that needs to be measured? Im struggling to explain myself but I want to know how do you differentiate the pair..
Nothing is ever random even if it can not be measured
If you didn't read this I never wrote it ! LOL
😁
I don't care if we're in a simulation or not, it simply does not give an answer to every question we have as there has to be something simulating us, meaning another universe where matter seemingly spawned out of nowhere just like ours? You could argue maybe in their universe, they have the answers, but then it would still be hard to imagine that their universe just "appeared" out of nowhere from matter/energy. ( Just like we can't explain what was there BEFORE the big bang )
Sure, but then it would be good keep asking the same question recursively to know who are the creators of the simulators? In turn, they would also be simulators of some other creators. And this would be endless which is not possible. As mentioned here, it is consciousness.
Universes creating one another.inception
The “Big Bang” was the simulation being turned on/ activated/ coming into existence.
That's just it, matter does not just appear out of nowhere. One question scientists nor philosophers have never asked is: We are born with bodies only, right? How does anything else get into this third dimension? The answer is that it doesn't, it can't. Now go back and study ancient text that talks about Giants. It's all right there and google earth shows tell-tale signs of Giants all over it, throughout the millions and millions of years it's taken to make the Earth what it is. The Earth was once formless and void, before Giants. Before the war between "gods and men". History repeats over and over. ~Peace~
Before the big bang there was absolute CHAOS manifested through our primitive thoughts that used to be INSTANT manifestations.
Big Bang was the beginning of TIME.
Time is a slowdown of our primitive thoughts that caused chaos and Time is the only proof of our existence.
If time didn’t exist = everything would be fast and everyone would be able to manifest whatever they think about IMMEDIATELY.
My Sunday started off so well, pancakes and orange juice, playing board games with my daughter…
I turn on RUclips for 10 minutes and now I’m facing an existential crisis.🤔
just think about next sunday with your daughter
In the last chapter he just scientifically explained God
Tetrahedrons are strikingly similar, in this videos visualisation, to the polys used in 3d modelling.
Gets the imagination going in terms of simulated reality.
The simulation theory sounds so crazy to me like WHO runs this simulation? Are they living in a world like this or Is it completely different? Who says that a computer like theirs would even leave traces? Why would we think that our physical laws or theories apply to the observer‘s world? I feel like if this theory turns out to be true, we‘ll just have more questions than we did before 😅
That’s science for you🥹
What sort of dumb thinking is this, how does this prove the cosmos is not real ?
The only thing this proves is that phenomena can be influenced by observer and not that nature is not real, who comes with the dumb ideas from a 0 basis ?
Or the answer is simple... There's a God and He created this place.
@@amark350 that's a good way of perceiving it. No matter what you believe it sort of all meshes together into one... uni-verse
@@amark350 If God exist, he isn't some magic man in the sky giving people cancer and burning homos in hell.
He's just an asshole using science we can't yet comprehend. You know how they say sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic? Well miracle is just another word for magic.
It may be a simulation but the pain is real.
yea,,,its pretty sophisticated.....
A VR Videogame with capability of smell, touch and feel.
pain don't hurt... J. Dalton
@@TalkingGIJoe tell him about my toothache
oh hell yes it is.....
I'm still trying to figure out how to open my happy meal.
One of the best videos that incorporates physics and human mind.
Pretty sure what they mean is. "We really don't know anything for sure. Still lets throw some random math equations out there. We made it fit the solution we desired."
This.
Yep! Lots of hocus-pocus.
Quantum physics is very difficult to understand. The results of experiments completely change when someone begins to take measurements. It's almost as if particles "know" they're being measured or observed - kind of like they would if we were living in a simulation.
@@zzanatos2001 It's too early to tell. Quantum physics is still in its infancy. And there is no guarantee that how we understand it today will be anything like we understand it in a century.
One can speculate, but there is little in the way of proof to support a simulation theory. Mathematics and logical arguments can be used to support a lot of invalid theories.
In othrer words somebody is full of shit!
*Morpheus* : "What is _real_ ? How do you define _real_ ? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then _real_ is simply electrical signals intepreted by your brain"
Underrated comment
take away the electrics. And see what you're left with......
Reply to Einstein: What is incomplete is not the theory, what is incomplete is the visible reality. Because it doesn't tell us anything about what is going on in the invisible part.
Yantra in ancient Hindu scriptures.
If the speed of light reveals the limit of the processing speed of the larger simulating computer, then the infinite speed of entangled particle information exchange rules out the simulation theory as it requires the larger computer to be faster than infinitely.... I vote for a conscious universe
Paradoxically it can be one of the possibile explanations. If quantum entanglement is just a special communication chanel between two objects outside of space, then it could be an argument for a simulation, not against. Imagine that you have basic communication grid where the information spreads between nearest objects thus limiting the speed of information from object A to B. But when you establish direct channel between much further objects, from the perspective of simulated being, you'll break maximal speed for the information but not from the point of view of the simulation itself. Space is only simulated. For the computer, any of the objects in memory is easily accessible at any time ignoring your perceived distance.
Unfortunately, there is no way to use the information from quantum enganglement so the universe doesn't need to calculate anything.
The speed of light is not arbitrary, and the narrator was incorrect when he said scientists do not understand it. The speed of light represents the time delay between cause and effect, which in 3D is instantaneous, but in 4D spacetime (which is curved) has a small value > 0.
If we’re in a simulation would the Big Bang be when the player powered on the game? 🤔 🤔
You forgot the PS 1 load screen before the bigbang
wow
It could have been simulated or not and just started from a relevant point in the future.
Rather when powered on the computer. There was just pure energy. Than bios and various programs loaded and formed particles- building bloks of reality. Than they started interacting and formed consciousness of the universe which formed other various things and is actively managing the universe.
@@tomaspail9185 So the big bang was actually just a cutscene to provide a backstory before the game started?
Is it some kind of Minecraft world ?
"You'll never know where the village is until you explore and render it"
That's probably not the worst metaphor. I never played the game. Are there irreversible consequences once you find something? If there are, then we are getting close.
Also, I m still connected to my loved ones that passed on, I think about them every day. Always will. Wherever they are
The universe is not only stranger than you imagine; but stranger than you can imagine.😂
I read one commentator say in regards to the simulation theory "If we live in a simulation, my player sucks at video games!" lol... still makes me chuckle today.
I sometimes find it really hard to believe scientists have found so many things invented so much about the world Universe time space.
The speed of thought is faster than the speed of light.
When we pray to God, that's quantum entanglement.
That's a really interesting thought
Your concept of "god" is only in your mind, which was interpreted by another thus making it a symbol that has been embedded deep within you. Nothing more than an idea to cope with the unknown. Humans have been interpreting and defining what's unknown since becoming aware of their surroundings, only pretending to know the unknown.
3:53 Actually sound is an interpretation of physical/mechanical waves so in reality the tree does create mechanical waves through the air causing vibration but without an interpreter it isn't really "sound"...
Correct, there is no "sound" without a brain to create it because "sound" is an ideation created in a brain. "Sound" did not exist prior to brains harnessing vibrations through a medium for a survival benefit and turning those vibrations into something that could be perceived (using a sensory organ).
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to FEEL it, does it make tactile sensations? No, because a brain (working through sensory organs) is necessary in order to ideate tactile sensations. Tactile sensations are a response to matter and energy, and the matter and energy of the tree falling still happens, still exists, but tactile sensations do not exist unless a brain converts matter and energy inputs into an ideation. Same with sound.
@@niveketihw1897 Well maybe the trees aren't even there without an observer.
@@niveketihw1897 Agreed. Or as our physics master tried to simplify it for us : "The falling tree causes a pressure wave which is picked up by minute hairs in the ear canal which vibrate and send electrical pulses to the brain which it interprets as sound", or some such, it was over 50 years ago.
@@thomassmith1922 ...I once had a tree at one corner of my house. I walked to the corner to meet the school bus. Arriving home that tree had fallen across the driveway narrowly missing my step.
I never heard it fall. But I know it was there. I had to clean up the mess.
So was it "real"?
@@besticudcumupwith202 Yes I think its real. But this quantum stuff says its just information that becomes our reality when observed. Its beyond my pay grade though
hey, not sure if this is a valid question or if there's just a lot i haven't understood yet.. but does this work? what if the quantum particles exist in a higher dimension as one particle whose properties are changing when we "create" 2 particles in this dimension. I'm thinking that distance is no longer a factor because in that higher dimension, it still exists as one particle. that way, measurement of the state of one particle immediately determines the state of the other regardless of the distance.. like.. is this something? i'm not well versed in any of this.. i thought it might be worth a comment for discussion
Cool idea
Yes, anything transfering information faster then the speed of light experiences 0 space, so dimensionally speaking its much easier to think of as transitioning through another dimension, or through a 0 dimension, as to the truth of either i'm not sure we actually know the answer or can know as any tests for something would be in thought experiements and probably philosophy currently.
Reckon the speed of light limitations and, entanglement get my simulation vote.
@@gerrybanyard1440that's dumb, because a simulation is supposed to be an exact copy of the original reality to test something safely that we would be able to do originally, that would mean that the speed of light is the same in the original universe we were created in, so that's no an excuse to say we are in a "simulation" also another thing to note down, do you really think we will have the resources to make a simulation EXACTLY like our reality? NO. Humans are fighting wars, natural disasters happen all around the globe, it's dumb to think the simulation theory makes sense because of the speed of light being the limit to how fast information is able to get around our universe, it's stupid. the amount of energy you would need to even power such a simulation that looks indistinguishable from our reality is INSANE. there would be no point to put such resources into such a dumb project, it would be much too expensive, and even if we tried, I would only say that we could get close, but it would never be indistinguishable. Also I doubt you can control how the brain sees and how it expresses feelings so easily by controlling the electrical signals within the brain without damaging the brain. The chance that we are in a simulation is not even close to 50/50, ITS MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH lower when you take these viewpoints into account.
Thanks for uploading❤
8:23 "We would not be able to notice any glitches."
I find this line extremely interesting. It actually would make quite a bit of sense if reality was a simulated one. A great example of a glitch would be the following:
In 2019 I got into a really bad motorcycle accident. During the process of flying through the air, I experienced a "Slowdown" to almost a frame by frame state. Mind you, this took seconds to occur. This is a re-occurring theme across many individuals who have experienced traumatic events such as these where everything slows down. It could just be adrenaline, however, this would mean the body would have to find the threat, react accordingly, and have that reaction be basically instantaneous. The likelihood of reality rebuilding itself for the individual experiencing the simulation in a situation such as this seems pretty likely. Especially if it wasn't a "planned" event, or "destiny". This would mean reality would have to essentially in an instant rebuild an entire future for that individual path.
Many who have spent years in a monk's temple meditating, or even those who have experimented with natural plants that alter consciousness have come back with the same collective messaging.
1). We, and everything that lives are connected, we are one.
2). The universe is alive, and it is experiencing itself through us.
3). The purpose of life is experience, and to learn how to love with indifference.
One can even make the argument that this "Source" is what original nomadic civilizations may have called God. The very first religion ever created was the belief that everything has a soul or a spirit, and this seems to be not too far off from what we are discovering today. I believe at the end of this journey with what we call physicality, your placement and where you go will be determined on your own pre-defined belief system or lack thereof. If you believe only 144,000 people will go to heaven and the rest will burn and you subconsciously find or deem yourself unworthy, you place yourself in that punishment. Whereas if you do well, help others, and vibrate at a higher state for the majority of your time here in servitude and kindness to others, you will find a more welcoming place after this life.
Arthur Koestler wrote some very good books about it and understandible for a non-scientist
Time stood still when I had an accident, I didn't dare lift my head because I would die if I did. But looking at the windscreen I saw every crack occurring. It took less than seconds but to me it took an eternity and I was literally hanging on to life
We are able to perceive reality through our 5 senses. However, consciousness may ultimately not be limited by physical senses. Therefore, it is not possible due to our physical limitations to fully comprehend consciousness or reality.
Had a similar experience in which it actually felt likt time stood still untill there was a new future
@@7BDAC Ramifications of reality.. Or maybe your brain worked slower as it was trying to figure out what was happening.. You know in everyday issues we take everything for granted and don't examine every second of our experiences. There lies the difference between known and unknown instances.
Didn't expect the ideas on emergence theory from Klee Irwin and his team at Quantum Gravity Research to show up in the middle of this video but Im delighted it did. Im a layman fan of them and Garrett Lisi's work with the E8 Lie group.
And then I groaned at simulation theory.
Is the emergence theory a wake-up call?
Check "The Japanese water experiment!". Water molecules changes form when it is exposed to positive and negative emotions. This is proof of how we send out different vibrations depending on whether they are positive or negative emotions.
2:22 -“pairs connected -entanglement” means phenomenon that should not occur due to the “laws” of physics can occur because somewhere else those laws are void. The behavior is determined regardless of the space the “object” is contained within
Some of the assumptions, theories, and conclusions mentioned just make me shake my head. When we ask about "real", what are we comparing it to? If there are multiple levels of simulations going on, only the top most level would be "real", but any conscious entities in that level would also wonder if they were the top level or not. Bottom line, our mind and senses can only get us so far in understanding.
If this is a simulation, then my question is who's running it, and what answer is this simulation supposed to produce for them? More importantly what does that make us?
Yes , we're living in a simulation, running by higher dimensional beings.
@@user-lf2ui7mn1f Then this is some sick joke and something is laughing at our struggles they caused.
Im more curious about what kind of beings are running us, and how are they so sure they're no simulations themselves... Which makes it a pointless thing to ponder on for me.
@@jahlasam They may also be simulations as well.
Same reason we play multiplayer GTA 😏
Have you ever driven a long distance and hear your radio station losing signal? Sometimes you even hear another radio station coming in. You can partially hear both for a brief period of time.
I’ve always wondered gleefully…Are ghosts and other paranormal phenomena simply distortions in parallel realities?
Turn the radio off.
It can't be. Why would their first instinct would be to harm us if they are from a parallel universe ? Also, why would only living things distort and not other life less objects?
Turn off the radio.
Turn on your brain.
Sometimes I think the same thing about people who hear voices. Some type of overlap from a different spectrum of awareness
@@MarcF.Nielssen you are the radio, turn off your brain
Didn't learn anything.The video says the universe isn't real and then the next line goes, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, slow claps
In the quran, God says over and over "this world is not real", "this world is an ILLUSION" "you think it's real but it's not" "this world is a test" "Reality begins on judgment day"
I am not preaching just stating what Muslims have understood for 1,400 years, but science is finally catching up.
Our perceptions don't define reality
Ok. But for us they do. Not necessarily for others. But others define us how we define ourselves, unless we have a clear disability
Imagine a character in a video game, given consciousness to understand it's surroundings defined by the video game... but trying to understand beyond the program itself and then the hardware beyond it.
A simulation within a simulation
*"A simulation within a simulation"* No.
As you said at the beginning.. "Imagine a character.." That would be a virtual distinct character for a computer program (AI), the rest of your comment would describe what an AI will be expected/understood to follow up with.
Just Me
A story based on a computer character becoming conscious in its own simulation (holodeck) was done in Star Trek.
What if the game conceals a hidden power intended for characters and NPCs to discover their creator, making it the central goal of the game?
So you all have discovered life and death. Everyone has always known this from the beginning of time and now science has validated now.
Scientists today are fast taking on the description of the very thing they once despised: alchemist "puffers".
Really hard for a common person like me to know if it is reality or sim, I mean I grew up in a poor country and grew up poor. I saw wealth in the hands of other's it's like luck is always stacked against me, but sometimes everything I predict comes true, like a part of the brain causes perceived reality to warp to it.
If it is a sim our brain holds the only key to break out and experience what is real
I think that’s superstitious to say that a part of the brain can warp reality and effect the probability of an outcome unless you’re Wanda Maximoff.
It’s more likely that it’s simply by chance that something happened and that you were logically able to determine which event is more likely to happen based on what you know.
While it is interesting to theoretically consider if anything is even real, I don’t think it does someone any good. As far as we know, we only live once. The best thing you can do for yourself is just try and enjoy your life.
@@matthewbelike
"Once you go full Twilight Zone, you never go back."
---Albert Einstein
If your in a simulation your brain is part of that simulation. Your brain may not actually exist outside of it.
Furthermore laws of physics can be completely different in whichever reality is simulating ours, so I find it kind of illogical to try and prove we live in a simulation using the science that lives within it.
@@idmt93 I think Philomena Cunk needs to do an episode on this.
1+1=2
It works every where in the universe no matter where
But it is different for physics and chemistry
Coincidence I think not
"We might be living in a simulation..."
"Let's try crashing it."
Yeah, we - human beings - must try everything! Not because it makes sense, but just because we CAN. And because we need to know what happens. We are not very good at forseeing consequences. 😮
Nah bro the servers and cpu are too strong
How do you suppose we do that oh wait I got an idea!!! We look for a door open it than find the wires or outlet that plugs us in and cut it maybe lights will go out!! But than we just killed billions of simulated characters and committed suicide at the same time but I'm game let's try!!!!
It’s not about simulation
There can be any one of these two purposes behind the creation of this simulated world by an external observer: 1) to harness energy 2) for entertainment
I think there's no purpose at all
When there's a creator, there exists creation.
Just as the sun has no choice but to shine and dispel darkness, it cannot coexist with darkness in the same room.
A creator and the absence of creation cannot coexist.
The way how latent spaces work inside an ai image generator (which are higher dimentional mathematical constructs), feels as an uncanny analogue of how higher dimentional crystals seem to work on projecting reality.
Even if we are simulated, then also there must be a reason behind the experiment ongoing.
@@notsure8066 I sometimes think, if universe is a body of something, our planet is like the cancer cell inside these body.
@@krishnamohanyerrabilli4040 I don’t believe none of is. I believe that we’re extremely important to the universe and that the universe was the creation of something. Not sure if it’s god or anything but something caused the Big Bang and the vast expansion of the universe. We humans are a very intelligent species and our planet has about everything think about it. We have science we have plants, fish, mammals, insects, ect. We have plants that have the ability to ALTER our own reality and see and feel things our minds can’t and reach us more about our selfs and our reality. Is it a coincidence that we humans live in such a beautiful and stable planet with all these resources that we don’t see as strange but clearly are. In a way if we possess consciousness and we’re able to observe and study the universe and we are a product of the universe. Doesn’t that mean the universe has consciousness?
@@notsure8066 exactly. God wants to prevent real suffer by doing a simulation of our biology first. He wasn’t sure where it goes because he gave his simulated beings free will. Now he sees that many children suffer despite not having done anything wrong. This makes him doubt if he should use our greedy biology when he creates the unsimulated/real reality.
@@krishnamohanyerrabilli4040yep and when we learn to go to other solar systems ( other organs , cells, it is the cancer spreading. Of course the being could throw some asteroids at us to kill the cancer , of course we could learn how to beat those asteroids). Basically it’s us against the being we are living in. Since we are cancer , as weird as this may sound , I’m rooting for us. We are cancer , we are just trying to survive. It’s not our fault. If it’s in our dna to be cancer then cancer is all we can be. We can want to be different. But if it’s our dna then we can’t help it. We are programmed that way. Of course if the being dies so do we , but I see no reasons n why we shouldn’t live as long as we can . We need to do the best that we live as long as possible. And when our local sun dies in a few billion years we will too if we don’t figure out how to move to a different organ in this beings body.
How does Anna know Lukes's coin is landed opposite of hers? They were two different coins. It literally says the results are random, but then goes on to say that Anna knows what side Luke's landed on.
What ties these two objects together?
I was thinking exactly the same thing I think it's funny how he seemed so sure of it to where I even thought he knew of some experiment to prove or something then goes on to say that particals cannot be predicted when messured I'm pretty sure that would count as messuring so there for she wouldn't know I was looking at Hella comments your the only one that caught this ... this tells me they don't know shit still lol
That’s a bad example. There are properties like spin of particle pairs that have to be opposite to from one to the second one. That is what is being measured and the information about those states of spin travels instantaneously- infinity faster than speed of light.
That’s what he’s talking about that it was verified over distance in Headron Colider
@@JohnyBravo44 Yes but that information is determined at the moment of the objects' time of separation. They aren't in constant communication with one another over lightyears. It's just remembered information.
@@RCShenanigans My understanding is that the coins represent two entangled particles behaving in an opposite manner to one another. So if you did this with two random coins then they could both land on heads or do essentially whatever they want. The coin is an analogy. So if Anna and Luke were light years apart and both received one of the entangled pair each, they would be able to observe the properties of their own particle and immediately know the properties of the other. The coin analogy just helps break it down for dull minds like my own.
Reality is not a product of consciousness. Reality exists independent of consciousness. The nature of reality cannot be known. ☝️☝️
This is one of the most interesting videos I have seen on this channel. Here’s a thought:
If we are living in a simulation, do we really have free will? Or is it possible we are given the illusion of free will in order to keep the chaos down? Are we just characters in a game, oblivious to our “user” like TRON, or can we determine our own fate, regardless of the simulation we may, or may not, exist in?
Also, if we were to go from atom to molecule to crystal, tetrahedron, etc. to the human brain, my belief is that knowledge is exponential Al and it will not take 100 years, but 30.
If free will exists, I will it to be that I have free will.
@@TechDeath28 Free Will cannot exist
Interesting
I don't think free will exists if we're in a simulation..
maybe the act of decision making is like a few prompts brought up to a player in which it picks one and thats how we decide things. lol
Giving various explanations to our reality is just a coping mechanism for us to deal with the inevitable end we all face.
there is that
As someone who has a background in Physics, I always went along with the accepted point that the randomness within a quantum entangled system prevents FTL communications. I recently read a book 'Cracking the Cosmic Code' which actually shows that the randomness is not a restriction at all. It now opens up the distinct possibilities of FTL communications.
Why are you telling is that you don't understand physics, though? ;-)
Ancient Hindu texts clearly state that the fastest thing is "consciousness" even faster than the light.
So, were in an 8D universe but can only understand and or interact in 4D if the tetrahedron theory is correct? Honestly as a gamer it isn't hard for me to imagine this is all a simulation. Eventually the simulation gets smart enough to make simulations and when they are smart enough to make consciousness they continue the cycle, like a God.
wow
Precisely.
Theoretically speaking, each dimension of reality that precedes the next is more “boring” than the other. Chances are the reality creator programs what cannot be achieved in theirs. Elon Musk made a great point about how at base level we are essentially doing this with video games
Our behaviours are like a computer programmed by different softwares, everything good or bad one has experienced since birth is recorded in the brain as if they're different softwares and many reactions stem from them
We are essentially a carbon based biological computer.
What sort of dumb thinking is this, how does this prove the cosmos is not real ?
The only thing this proves is that phenomena can be influenced by observer and not that nature is not real, who comes with the dumb ideas from a 0 basis ?
What makes you think that if we were in a simulation that the outside of that universe would follow the same rules?
i dreamt i'd eaten a huge marsh mallow....when i woke up i couldn't find the pillow !
Dude whenever you were describing simulation Theory it reminded me of Sunday School just with different words and yes we did get an instruction manual
Except Sunday school was an entire crock of lies. Millions+++++ have been duped for 2 Millenia.
Are we living in someone's mind? Why is the structure of the universe so similar to the brain ?
ive been thinking about this aIot
Because (insert whatever you want here). Haha. I like the idea of our knowledge being like a small island, and everything beyond the island is unknown. I get tired of anyone who speaks in absolutes. Throughout history, what we "know" changes/evolves.
And are our brains all universes with creatures existing and experiencing their own reality on a much much smaller sacale?
Interesting to think about is the only thing im sure about tho :) been thinking that we might are the universe simulation itself thru our consciousness, something in that path.. (soz not native eng)
The Big Fellah has a sense of humor. He lets us learn one thing and poses two more questions as we think we are onto something.
It is nice to come here time from time for good laugh, good science fiction.
We building another “simulation” where its gonna become a reality, then they are gonna try to build another simulation based on the “simulation” and thats where multiple realities start to happened… but who started the first reality?
Watching the scientific videos makes things more mind boggling than clear. 🤯
This is clearly stated and explained in our Bhagavata purana, markhandeya purana, yoga vasishta books...... Many more are there in our upanishad books. Our olden days saints/Gurus/Rishi munis knew and they taught this to their students and the knowledge was transferred through communication and memory as they were not having equipments to document these. Later they started documenting and now many are available to read, understand and get to know. Great explanation are given in Garuda Purana as well...... Many books you can get to understand these concepts easily. (Must read only from olden days' Sanskrit converted books - ancient scholars name will be specified)
Bro Aisa kese ho sakta hai ki vo bhot knowledgeable the or unpe aise equipment nahi the ki document kr ske
It's easy to prove that our brain creates different colors out of different wavelengths of light. It turns out that our brain creates everything like that out everything because everything is waves.
I am Indian
According to Hindu cosmology
our ancient saints and sages predicted that our existing universe is dual in nature
it exists both in material and non material
To our material sence it appears as material world
To our spritual sence it is as conciousness
Our universe doesn't exist is wrong
Science cannot prove God in the laboratory but we can perceive it with our own spiritual sense only
Could quantum entanglement be a connection through a wormhole? Is it possible to create quantum-sized wormholes? If possible, quantum entanglement doesn't violate locality.
I'm not very versed in this subject but an entangled particle shouldn't necessarily be subject to if we see it right? It reminds me of Schrödinger's cat, even though we don't know the answer the cat is definitely either dead or alive. Just because we can't tell something doesn't mean its existence is relative to us. Sounds kinda self-absorbed ngl. Correct my errors though, because maybe I'm misunderstanding.
that is a really interesting idea
All we need is possibility, experiment and probability. If something is possible mathematically, we need to experiment with some hypothesis. And the probability shows the result.
"It’ll be gratifying for sure that praising yellow school busses will achieve the desired results of spicy kimchi-flavored ramen that has been a hub for agricultural growth for thousands of years, despite the antisymmetry feature of fermionic wave functions in the vacuum of space pretending that everything is just fine. There is an additional algebraic structure of superfluid liquids that demonstrates the importance of critical thinking forming potato salad, which helps more than you could know. Get your skeptical head out of the ground. The facts are very simple that karate tournaments cause a build up of differentials in freshly mowed grass and the angular momentum of rubber duckies. Surprisingly, there are no exhaustive studies on this yet. I ask this of every single one of you on this planet to not forget ice cream with activated charcoal. Although, if you speak to anyone about this, you just get shrugged shoulders and blank looks. Therein lies the problem. Remember that facilitating honest discussions about rubber duckies will open the floodgates for pumpkin pecan waffles rich in stellar nuclear synthesis."
---Albert Einstein
The answer is obvious - they are connected or the same via and underlying ‘field’ or alternative dimension… Ahh, just got to the part about quasi crystals… yup, something like that.. :/)
The particles share an environment, and they may be programmed by their environment making them look like the math. Modern science is most certainly myopically dancing around math and missing some mechanism to nature. No one is responsible for what they think they know. It is ONLY what they were taught. No one questions what they were taught. The effect of the double slit may be caused by the slits. Inertia, charge, and gravity may have more in common than you think, but it wasn't TAUGHT to you, so WE'RE SCREWED!
Consciousness is one powerful force 👏 💪
Or alternatively, it could be exactly what it looks like
@@nunyafunyuns It doesn't look like anything. They describe it with math as soon as they can, then they derive cause from THAT hasty math. That is why cause, to them, is laws and mnemonic devices. The conservation of angular momentum and the right-hand rule are not causal to a gyro. Look at my latest gyro video. You will see what CAUSE looks like. This is basic mechanics misrepresented by math, it's not light or an atomic nucleus. It's in your face.
@@jnhrtmn I'll check it out 👍
" No one questions what they were taught." Ummmm..... Well actually a lot of people do question. That is why we discover things like quantum mechanics, or even simple things like plate tectonics.
So, I live in a simulation as a dimensional time traveler.
I once told my mom that I was sent here to help you and to protect you.
I also saw her from the universe as a floated or hovered about earth. I could hear her crying.
As I had a voice from one of the gods yell me.
Do you want to meet her, help her?
Has I was thinking I Said, yes, then I was sucked in by the speed of light towards her."
I talked to my mom when I was a child, and I told her about me being a reincarnated soul and that I lived different lives before this one.
Has I got older, I told her about me being in a simulation and that the rest of our family lives on earth, not in a simulation.
That is a way to keep my consciousness in Tack. That we talked about when she passes away I hope she goes to heaven along with the rest of my family, as I told her, once that happens I get to wake up in my other life, back home.
The day she mystery passed away , that day , I Said, you gave me a wonderful life, life that is incredible and rememble and maybe I cane into your life has a glish as an interruption because you lost your way in your 20s and lost hope and love. I'm glad you got that back, as she hugged me she Said , I will always think and watch you, you made me believe in the afterlife in ways I didn't before and every one has their last days, last minutes to enjoy life. I'll find you when you wake up from this simulation you say you are in with me.
I said that not all humans are in a simulation, just a few like me.
You see after she left my bed, I woke up and had an out of body near death experience and I saw my mom enter the gates of heaven and it was beyond any programming any Ai could dream up in a generator.
I say that because many people who run the simulations , don't think heaven is real, they think they will always be transferred to other pary of a more realistic upgraded a more advanced consciousness of living buy in a way they are bond to an ai generator and can't wake out of it because they didn't do there missions.
As for me , I did all I promised my mom I would do, and I got the ultimate gift to remember her forever. As of right now , my mom and I communicate through a frequency that she can tap into heaven to me as I live on earth. Because she once Said, she's a hard-working woman, and she will choose to work in the afterlife to always help me.
But , let's say I wake up from this simulation and I did all my levels of consciousness, will my mom be a memory of a real human or a dignity enhance person that went beyond a synthetic human.
To me, I'm stuck between a simulation and me time traveling to earth, literally from a different world. I know what home looks like, not what is behind the gates of heaven, but I've experienced the outer pockets of heaven with portals with the spirit world.
If I'm in a simulation, i wonder if I showed my ai generator things they couldn't program and I wrny beyond physics.
I've seen glishes in my life but did my parents when they were here on earth. They told me things.
Imagine considering yourself a scientist and moreover winning a NOBEL just to say that the Universe doesn't exist.....sheesh.....what a pitty !
Not sure if it's a glitch, but there have been random times, when I've experienced moments of "loss of identity/ identity crisis."
In those few seconds/ minutes, I actually forgot who I am and it was freaky. I had to gather myself quickly otherwise I would have got completely lost into that zone.
I think there would be others who might have had similar experiences. What do you think?
dude I get this a lot. like I forget I'm human and I'm confused where I am and who I am. idk how to explain it
Glitch must be confirmed by multiple independent entities. Otherwise it could be only your brain playing games on you.
your "player" might be in LAG
Kuch bhi comment! 😁 from Bryan babu! 😅😂
Just have another drink..
Excellent vid, keep up the good work
Fun fact: we are not living in a simulation.
Prove it
0:16 - In a way, what’s real is discrete
Imagine if we are being stimulated.The only way to look beyond the surface is consciousness...and it is the most fundamental way to interact with the universe.This is where enlightenment of the monks proven to be true ...they have surpassed the stimulation thing and realised the ultimate truth.."why we are here"...
so if I kill you it's ok cause your just a simulation🤣
Have u ever listened to. UG krishnamirti i have often felt this way when ever I listened to him
Everyone is living in their own simulation, which our five senses make it real. .We are seeking an answer from outside, which never be found, but definitely can find it from the inside.Coz our own mind is the architect of this reality.
Every healthy brain obviously builds a nearly identical model of reality from the incoming senses, as the other members of that species. We each make our own simulation, but they are almost identical ones, as we share nearly identical hardware. If the simulation gets very far off from average, we call the owner of that simulation insane or criminal or naive at best.
There is no 'Everyone'. There is only The One.
Idk when i think about the subject of oneness, in my opinion i think maybe the two still exist.. Everyone and The one are both correct, when i try and understand what is meant by we are one and not separate from one..maybe its because we are all separate parts of the whole of something bigger than us which we perceive as the earth. Just the same way our cells within our body are separate parts of a whole, which is perceived as a human. And maybe the way our body systems work together to keep us alive, we are supposed to work together as one to keep the earth and everything within it alive and functional. If we weren't seperated by borders and manmade structures all of mankind would be able to roam freely. Its hard to understand why countries fight for land and such when this earth is so vast that there should be enough land for everyone.❤ So until we reach that peace and harmony amongst one another to be a fully functional system for the planet, we haven't reached the goal of oneness yet. Yes we can say we are one by ourselves. But one alone is not as powerful as the whole would be
@@rudolphvega592 The Oneness is not physical or phenomenal.
Exactly
I have asked myself as well if we were living in a simulation and I have watched a few videos already. I found a conclusion of one youTuber, called „The Why files“ very profound: Believing in god or the simulation, what‘s the difference?
I thought that was the best answer to that question. I both cases, we are talking about a creator or multiple creators. And I had profound thoughts about those theories ( god and simulation theory ) and I come to this conclusion: The question still remains, when we were created, were do our creators come from? How does their universe look like and does it follow any laws of nature and probably yes, so which and how would they differ from ours?
And still: Where does that come from and why does anything in our universe and the potential universe of its creator*s exist at all?
It's not that the Universe isn't real. It's that the 'observable' Universe is not what it appears to be to our limited, finite human brains. All things are revealed on the other side of the veil. Love and Light to all.
I believe we are the product of something we are going to create. Its an infinite loop ❤
Only till the moment you escape it.... i call it "going to God"
This looks interesting! Definitely going to watch this little nugget later
Not little my friend 😅
Don't bother, it's misrepresenting the paper that came out. Nobody has proven that the Universe doesn't exist. Don't worry
Consciousness serves a crucial purpose: intense feedback. Any conscious creature would be immediately motivated to act to preserve itself as it receives experiences of danger and opportunity. Zombies wouldn't.
8:30 Hadron trying to crash the server we're on. lol
"We will show them Our signs in the universe and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that this ˹Quran˺ is the truth. Is it not enough that your Lord is a Witness over all things? " *Surah Fussilat, 41-53, Al-Quran*