JK for the clarity. Do you think Iqbal presents a pan-en-theism view of Allah or it is the wording in chapter 2 and 3 of reconstruction that gives this notion.
In short, Iqbal's overall perspective does align with "Wahdat al Shahood" to a great degree, though there is much detail to this and there are differences too ... and yes, chapters 2-4 of reconstruction quite well corroborate that claim.
God is a ultimate joy, continuous bliss. No such thing exists. Your needing something that doesn't exist is the foundation of your problems. Change, freedom, transformation of your ego into the divine or ultimate ego as Iqbal puts it and everything are only minor variation from a similar topic: everlasting joy. Not that one ought to become enemy of God or a nonbeliever. As far as I might be concerned, the theist and the non-devotee to God, and the one who considers himself an agnostic, every one of them are in a comparable situation. There isn't anything there, just your knowledge and experiential structure, your reality which obviously is relative. There is no such thing as truth in an objective manner by any means. There isn't anything which exists outside or free of our relative imaginations. How can it matter regardless of whether what they (including Iqbal) have said is valid. It ultimately depends on you to find out. I can express that there is no purpose and assuming there is any purpose, we have not a chance of knowing it. We just recur everything we have been told from birth to death. We are made to accept that there is a reason, and that conviction is liable for the awfulness of humankind today. We have likewise been made to accept that we are made for a more special reason, than every one of the animal groups on this planet. This isn't all. We are additionally informed that the entire creation was made to support man: that is the reason we have made this multitude of issues - natural issues and issues of contamination. Presently, we are nearly where we will explode ourselves. The planet isn't at serious risk, yet we are in harm's way. You can contaminate this planet and do a wide range of things; the planet can ingest everything - even these human bodies. In the event that we are cleared out, nature understands how to manage our bodies. That is all it is keen on. Thus, we are not any more intentional or significant than some other specie on this planet. I can say this, yet what do the you need to say? That is a higher priority than what I need to say. We truly don't have the foggiest idea. We have no chance of knowing anything. Indeed, even the researchers - they can get out whatever they like. How can it intrigue us? It doesn't exactly make any difference regarding how this entire universe was made - whether God made it, or the situation emerged from some residue and rocks, or hydrogen particles some place. It is for the researchers to discuss this, and sometimes concoct new speculations. However, the speculations don't assist us with grasping anything. So I truly couldn't say whether there is any reason. I don't believe that there is any. I see no significance or reason throughout everyday life. Every idea, concept and thought exists only in our minds which obviously is the collection of knowledge and experience of the people who existed before. What we don't see is that this living creature can't touch anything dead. This body that we have doesn't care about the metaphysical realities ( which don't exist anyhow) but only the basic needs for its survival and that survival is only physical, sensual and physiological rather than mental or spiritual. I hope I am able to convey what I wanted to say after watching all your videos on Iqbal and religion.
Is it possible to upload the notes?
Thanks for pointing out. Please find the link below ... Description also updated.
1drv.ms/f/s!AhUG3yIexCpWis0JptQyxQCR1bhQRA
Is there a way to contact you?
JK for the clarity. Do you think Iqbal presents a pan-en-theism view of Allah or it is the wording in chapter 2 and 3 of reconstruction that gives this notion.
In short, Iqbal's overall perspective does align with "Wahdat al Shahood" to a great degree, though there is much detail to this and there are differences too ... and yes, chapters 2-4 of reconstruction quite well corroborate that claim.
God is a ultimate joy, continuous bliss. No such thing exists. Your needing something that doesn't exist is the foundation of your problems. Change, freedom, transformation of your ego into the divine or ultimate ego as Iqbal puts it and everything are only minor variation from a similar topic: everlasting joy.
Not that one ought to become enemy of God or a nonbeliever. As far as I might be concerned, the theist and the non-devotee to God, and the one who considers himself an agnostic, every one of them are in a comparable situation.
There isn't anything there, just your knowledge and experiential structure, your reality which obviously is relative. There is no such thing as truth in an objective manner by any means. There isn't anything which exists outside or free of our relative imaginations.
How can it matter regardless of whether what they (including Iqbal) have said is valid. It ultimately depends on you to find out. I can express that there is no purpose and assuming there is any purpose, we have not a chance of knowing it. We just recur everything we have been told from birth to death. We are made to accept that there is a reason, and that conviction is liable for the awfulness of humankind today. We have likewise been made to accept that we are made for a more special reason, than every one of the animal groups on this planet. This isn't all. We are additionally informed that the entire creation was made to support man: that is the reason we have made this multitude of issues - natural issues and issues of contamination. Presently, we are nearly where we will explode ourselves. The planet isn't at serious risk, yet we are in harm's way. You can contaminate this planet and do a wide range of things; the planet can ingest everything - even these human bodies. In the event that we are cleared out, nature understands how to manage our bodies. That is all it is keen on. Thus, we are not any more intentional or significant than some other specie on this planet. I can say this, yet what do the you need to say? That is a higher priority than what I need to say. We truly don't have the foggiest idea. We have no chance of knowing anything. Indeed, even the researchers - they can get out whatever they like. How can it intrigue us? It doesn't exactly make any difference regarding how this entire universe was made - whether God made it, or the situation emerged from some residue and rocks, or hydrogen particles some place. It is for the researchers to discuss this, and sometimes concoct new speculations. However, the speculations don't assist us with grasping anything. So I truly couldn't say whether there is any reason. I don't believe that there is any. I see no significance or reason throughout everyday life. Every idea, concept and thought exists only in our minds which obviously is the collection of knowledge and experience of the people who existed before. What we don't see is that this living creature can't touch anything dead. This body that we have doesn't care about the metaphysical realities ( which don't exist anyhow) but only the basic needs for its survival and that survival is only physical, sensual and physiological rather than mental or spiritual.
I hope I am able to convey what I wanted to say after watching all your videos on Iqbal and religion.