Feynman's Technique of Integration

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 дек 2019
  • Feynman's trick for integration, aka differentiation under the integral sign. This integration technique is very useful in calculus and physics.
    Subscribe to @blackpenredpen for more fun calculus videos!
    Check out the book, Advanced Calculus Explored, amzn.to/2PpOJIX
    Check out daily_math_, / daily_math_

Комментарии • 601

  • @blackpenredpen
    @blackpenredpen  4 года назад +1596

    Is it fish or alpha?

    • @mrakoslav7057
      @mrakoslav7057 4 года назад +46

      Use something like Ž than you cant mess up

    • @ssdd9911
      @ssdd9911 4 года назад +156

      alfish

    • @chirayu_jain
      @chirayu_jain 4 года назад +67

      Maybe *alpha fish* 😅

    • @pwnd785
      @pwnd785 4 года назад +30

      Fish of course

    • @takureido3122
      @takureido3122 4 года назад +14

      It is *a* fish

  • @tjdowning4263
    @tjdowning4263 4 года назад +698

    You could also write the cos term as the real part of e^i5x, and then complete the square in the exponential to get the final answer. Physicists use that trick a lot in quantum field theory.

    • @michalbotor
      @michalbotor 3 года назад +1

      f(a) := integral from 0 to oo of exp(-x^2) cos(ax) dx
      g(a) := integral from 0 to oo of exp(-x^2) sin(ax) dx
      H(a) := integral from 0 to oo of exp(-x^2) exp(iax) dx
      H(a) = f(a) + ig(a)
      ∴ f(a) = Re(H(a)) && g(a) = Im(H(a))
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      exp(-x^2) * exp(iax) = exp( -x^2 + iax ) = exp(-( x^2 - iax )) = exp(-( x^2 - 2(ia/2)x + (ia/2)^2 - (ia/2)^2 )) =
      = exp(-( (x - ia/2)^2 + a^2/4 )) = exp( -(x - ia/2)^2 - a^2/4 ) = exp(-(x - ia/2)^2) exp(-a^2/4)
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      H(a) = integral from 0 to oo of exp(-(x - ia/2)^2) exp(-a^2/4) dx =
      = exp(-a^2/4) integral from 0 to oo of exp(-(x - ia/2)^2) dx
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      i am stuck at this moment.
      i tried the transformation u := x - ia/2 but i don't know what to do with the integral:
      integral from -ia/2 to (oo - ia/2) of exp(-u^2) du
      that has complex limits (i don't know if that is how i was supposed to set the limits of u variable either) and I am not able to split it into two integrals of real variable either.
      can you give me a hint how can i proceed from here?

    • @still.sriracha
      @still.sriracha 3 года назад +26

      @@michalbotor you did all that before understanding the basic concept of substitution :)
      Exp(-x^2) if multiplied by the euler's theorem would lead to addition of i in the expression whose integral in forward solving is a pain in butt (from past experiences)
      So moral is to find a logical concept and think on it before just scribbling this is pro tip in competitive level prep.
      Be well my friend.

    • @tanmaymishra9576
      @tanmaymishra9576 2 года назад +1

      Trueee

    • @groscolisdery1158
      @groscolisdery1158 2 года назад +8

      I was going to point it out as my way.
      But, I guess, the hosts wants to teach the Feynman's method.
      By the way, Feynman was a physicist if I remember correctly.

    • @groscolisdery1158
      @groscolisdery1158 2 года назад

      try y =x+-alpha*x/2

  • @krukowstudios3686
    @krukowstudios3686 4 года назад +428

    Wow... an integral question solved by partial derivatives, integration by parts, differential equations and the Gaussian Integral to top it all off. Amazing! More Feymann technique questions, please!!

  • @ekueh
    @ekueh 4 года назад +556

    Wow! Feyman’s technique, DI method, Gaussian, ODE all in one. What else can top this? Adding a bit of FTC perhaps

    • @cpotisch
      @cpotisch 3 года назад +39

      It inherently involves FTC because it involves indefinite integrals.

    • @executorarktanis2323
      @executorarktanis2323 3 года назад +2

      What's the full form of ftc?

    • @BiscuitZombies
      @BiscuitZombies 3 года назад +2

      AND the chen lu

    • @cpotisch
      @cpotisch 3 года назад +17

      @@executorarktanis2323 Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Which there already was plenty of, so I don’t see how OP thinks it was missing.

    • @executorarktanis2323
      @executorarktanis2323 3 года назад

      @@cpotisch oh thanks this brings back memories from when I was trying to learn calculus by youtube (self learnt) and didn't know the terms thanks for explaining it now since now I have more broad understanding than what I did 3 months ago

  • @ashwinmurali1911
    @ashwinmurali1911 4 года назад +160

    This is the coolest thing I watched today

  • @GusTheWolfgang
    @GusTheWolfgang 4 года назад +290

    That's insane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I love it.
    It makes me sad they don't teach this in my engineering courses :(

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  4 года назад +79

      AugustoDRA : )))
      I actually didn’t learn this when I was in school too. Thanks to my viewers who have suggested me this in the past. I haven a video on integral of sin(x)/x and that’s the first time I did Feynman’s technique.

    • @SimsHacks
      @SimsHacks Год назад +5

      It's covered in measure theory (math majors only) as one of the conditions to use the theorem is to find a L¹ function such that |d/da f(x,a)| ≤g(x) for almost all x.
      L¹ = set of functions with finite Lebesgue integral (not ±∞)

    • @maalikserebryakov
      @maalikserebryakov Год назад +8

      If you’re sad about that, you don’t belong in engineering.
      arcane mathematical techniques are nothing but a tool to an engineer, the primary of objective of an engineer is the creative process of ideating new machine designs, and this on its own is a massively difficult issue that takes enormous creative power.
      If you’re focusing on learning esoteric integration techniques, you aren’t focusing on engineering.
      I bet you aren’t an engineer now.

    • @GusTheWolfgang
      @GusTheWolfgang Год назад +4

      @@maalikserebryakov hahaha, you hit the nail on the head.

    • @thesnackbandit
      @thesnackbandit 9 месяцев назад +2

      @@GusTheWolfgang Was he right?

  • @srki22
    @srki22 4 года назад +8

    I really enjoy your enthusiasm while explaining things :)
    Thank you for the videos and please, never lose the energy, liveliness, and passion that you have now. Very nice!

  • @chirayu_jain
    @chirayu_jain 4 года назад +149

    If nothing works to solve a integral
    Then *feynman technique* would work😉
    BTW in the description of book, your name was also there 😁

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  4 года назад +18

      Chirayu Jain yup! I gave a review of the book : )))

    • @roswelcodiep.bernardo7288
      @roswelcodiep.bernardo7288 2 года назад +1

      Not that much... Sometimes we need to use complex analysis which includes residue theorem or Cauchy's Theorem

  • @MiroslawHorbal
    @MiroslawHorbal 4 года назад +13

    I really wish youtube existed when I was studying mathematics. The potential to be educated in advanced topics without paying a hefty fee for university tuition will hopefully change this world for the better.

  • @AlanCanon2222
    @AlanCanon2222 2 года назад +6

    I found the book in college that Feynman learned this trick from, it's Advanced Calculus By Frederick Shenstone Woods · 1926.

  • @felipelopes3171
    @felipelopes3171 4 года назад +44

    You can also notice that the function is even and replace the integral with half the integral from -inf to inf.
    Then you break up the cosine into two complex exponentials, separate into two integrals. For each one you can complete the square in the exponent and reduce to the integral of exp(-x^2) by shifting the variable.

  • @prevostluc4025
    @prevostluc4025 4 года назад

    I love all your videos, they are hearwarming. Thank you so much !

  • @chirayu_jain
    @chirayu_jain 4 года назад +61

    I remember this method, because in the video contest I did the integral of (e^-(x^2))*cos(2x) from 0 to infinity. BTW whenever I see e^(-x^2), I always think about feynman technique.

  • @yashvardhan6521
    @yashvardhan6521 3 года назад

    A beautiful technique explained beautifully!!

  • @geometrydashmega238
    @geometrydashmega238 4 года назад +4

    I've read some of the book's reviews and it looks awesome. I might pick one soon, the applications and integration techniques look interesting

  • @marinmaths3826
    @marinmaths3826 4 года назад +9

    Very nice use of Feynman’s technique. I’m getting the book rn!

  • @mekkinoureddine9647
    @mekkinoureddine9647 4 года назад +3

    Maths with you are wounderfull, thanks

  • @mamadetaslimtorabally7363
    @mamadetaslimtorabally7363 6 месяцев назад

    Excellent explanation. So brilliantly explained. Thanks a million.

  • @ralstonrobertson6644
    @ralstonrobertson6644 2 года назад

    This was a unique derivation technique. Thank you for sharing.

  • @frenchimp
    @frenchimp 2 года назад +32

    It's a bit crazy to call that the Feynmann technique. It goes back to Leibniz and it"s just deriving an integral depending on a parameter. Which by the way demands justification (either uniform convergence or dominated convergence). And in order to make this work you have to be extremely lucky and have a good intuition because you need 1) to find the right parametrization (here it's pretty obvious) ; 2) to be able to integrate the partial derivative for each value of the parameter (which is most of the time not possible) 3) to end up with a differential equation which you can solve (which is most of the time impossible), 4) to be able to compute a special value (here you need to know the value of the Gaussian integral, which is in itself tricky). So, I'd say it's a nice trick when it works but doesn"t qualify as a method...

    • @JohnSmith-qp4bt
      @JohnSmith-qp4bt 2 года назад +2

      It looks like the this problem was purposely designed to arrive at an aesthetically pleasing solution. (Given all the justifications/special circumstances/restrictions you mentioned)

    • @loudfare8840
      @loudfare8840 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@Hmmmmmm487Feynman learnt this method in a random book during his undergrad and he famously showed off to basically everyone that he could solve otherwise very hard integrals.

    • @artempalkin4070
      @artempalkin4070 8 дней назад

      Makes me a bit mad when people call it Feynman's technique. The guy did a lot of good things, but this one has nothing to do with him. They're basically saying that only an American in the middle of 20th century could come up with such idea... What did people all over the world do before that, when calculus was already so advanced, and things like FT and others were well known...

  • @TechnoCoderz369
    @TechnoCoderz369 10 месяцев назад +1

    This is great! Thank you! Richard Feynman really was a genius!

  • @samuelglover7685
    @samuelglover7685 4 года назад

    Very nicely done! Thanks!

  • @kingbeauregard
    @kingbeauregard 4 года назад +9

    My initial intuition was to use Feynman to get rid of the exponential term, because if you can get rid of that, trig functions are easy. The thing I didn't think through was the limits of integration: a trig function has no limit at infinity. So quite counterintuitively, it was the cosine that was going to be the troublesome element in all this, while the exponential term was what made the thing solvable.

  • @ingGS
    @ingGS 4 года назад

    This is one of the most beautiful videos I have seen. ¡Very complete and engaging explanation!

  • @johngillespie8724
    @johngillespie8724 2 года назад

    I like it. I love your enthusiasm too.

  • @ChollieD
    @ChollieD 4 года назад

    This is such an elegant proof. Really impressive.

  • @IshaaqNewton
    @IshaaqNewton 4 года назад +32

    Sometimes, a lot of integral practices makes me to say Instagram as Integram

  • @deeznutz-bn9sl
    @deeznutz-bn9sl Год назад +5

    POV: you can't sleep now, there are monsters nearby 7:36

  • @stephenkormanyos766
    @stephenkormanyos766 4 года назад

    Beautiful. Thank you so much.

  • @WilEngl
    @WilEngl 4 года назад

    Nice and clean trick ! Thank you.

  • @dudewaldo4
    @dudewaldo4 4 года назад

    That was an experience. What a crazy and amazing technique

  • @mokouf3
    @mokouf3 4 года назад +10

    Feymann's Technique + Differential Equation

  • @giovannimariotte4993
    @giovannimariotte4993 4 года назад

    Amazing¡¡¡¡ you must record more videos about this topic¡¡¡¡¡¡¡

  • @mokouf3
    @mokouf3 4 года назад

    This is an amazing question for Calc 2.

  • @mikeheyburn9716
    @mikeheyburn9716 10 месяцев назад +2

    As a teacher, I loved you saying "negative fish" and will use that in future. Cheers, always good to watch your videos too.

  • @BluesyBor
    @BluesyBor 4 года назад

    DAYUM, that's one of the most elegant solutions I've ever seen! Why none of my professors was teaching this when I was studying?

  • @therealbazor
    @therealbazor 4 года назад

    Awesome vid, really enjoyed it!!!!!!

  • @balajilakshminarayanan170
    @balajilakshminarayanan170 4 года назад

    such a beautiful video thanks

  • @muddle.
    @muddle. 8 месяцев назад

    lovely video, it's this that makes me love calculus

  • @user-pm9il1mu4c
    @user-pm9il1mu4c 2 года назад

    Beautiful!

  • @cameronbetts3902
    @cameronbetts3902 4 года назад +1

    Because the function is even, you can take the integral from -infinity to infinity and then that would double your answer so the final answer (given alpha = 2) would just be sqrt(pi)/e which i think is even cooler

  • @andrewdouglas793
    @andrewdouglas793 3 года назад

    Absolutely elegant

  • @zubmit700
    @zubmit700 4 года назад

    This was really nice!

  • @integralbilmeyenfizikmezun111
    @integralbilmeyenfizikmezun111 3 года назад

    Thank you guy.

  • @samvaidansalgotra7427
    @samvaidansalgotra7427 3 года назад

    Beautiful explanation😀

  • @pjhh8798
    @pjhh8798 9 месяцев назад

    beautiful, thank you

  • @sotocsick3195
    @sotocsick3195 15 дней назад

    Haven't seen a video for long time wich made me so happy :)

  • @jzanimates2352
    @jzanimates2352 4 года назад +1

    Congrats on 400K subscribers!!!

  • @phecdu
    @phecdu 4 года назад

    Love this. Like magic. So beautyful 😱

  • @hanst7218
    @hanst7218 4 года назад

    Great video man!

  • @irvngjuarez
    @irvngjuarez Год назад

    That was beautiful man just phenomenal

  • @deletedaxiom6057
    @deletedaxiom6057 4 года назад +1

    Well I must say ty to you Mr. @blackpenredpen . Thanks to your videos I finished Differential Equations with a B. It was on of my last 2 math classes for my mathematics BS

  • @michaelstudley8062
    @michaelstudley8062 4 года назад +10

    I'm halfway through algebra 1, and yet somehow I understand and enjoy most of these videos. You and other channels like you (e.g. Mathologer) make this stuff really accessible, and importantly, fun.
    (Not to say I don't enjoy my algebra 1 class!)

    • @skyrider8890
      @skyrider8890 4 года назад +3

      A great teacher is everything, right?

  • @ardavalilable
    @ardavalilable Год назад +1

    I love this channel!

  • @haradhandatta7048
    @haradhandatta7048 4 года назад

    Very Nice.Thanks.

  • @cruzazul2609
    @cruzazul2609 4 года назад +3

    I don't have an advanced level of English but that's one of a lot of thing that I love Maths, it's an universal language and your passion in every video is the thing because of I'm still here.
    Imagine! If I can understand you and I don't speak English fluently, you're MORE THAN AMAZING.
    Lots of love from Mexicoooo ꒰⑅ᵕ༚ᵕ꒱˖♡

  • @agrajyadav2951
    @agrajyadav2951 Год назад

    this made my day

  • @johnhumberstone9674
    @johnhumberstone9674 4 года назад

    Just beautiful!

  • @cletoazzani7763
    @cletoazzani7763 3 года назад

    Wow, nice solution !!!

  • @akshatahuja2523
    @akshatahuja2523 4 года назад +8

    All the feynman's techniques are UNIQUE 👍👍

  • @raunakroybarman1027
    @raunakroybarman1027 4 года назад +33

    I am agreeing that Feynman's technique is having a good strong hold in solving exponential integrals...but rather than complicating we could have solved it by manipulating "cos(5x)" as (e^5ix + e^-5ix)..it also saves the time...

  • @abhinavshripad5356
    @abhinavshripad5356 4 года назад +1

    π and e in a same expression is always beautiful

  • @nikunjy
    @nikunjy 2 года назад

    Very nice !

  • @xenolalia
    @xenolalia 4 года назад

    One can also observe that f(\alpha) is (up to a constant factor) just the Fourier transform of e^{-x^2}.

  • @LorenzoWTartari
    @LorenzoWTartari 2 года назад

    A fun trick would also be using the fourier tramsform of the bell curve

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP Год назад

    I very much enjoy watching the derivations, even though I know I'd probably never be able to figure it out myself.

  • @EntaroCeraphenine
    @EntaroCeraphenine 4 года назад

    One of the best crossover episodes ever

  • @octopuspartyofficial
    @octopuspartyofficial 4 года назад +4

    When you set alpha equal to sqrt(2 - 4ln(2)), you get sqrt(pi / e) for the answer. Pure beauty indeed.

  • @chadidridi9306
    @chadidridi9306 4 года назад +5

    University teacher: ur exam has integrals
    The intégral during the exam:

  • @hhht7672
    @hhht7672 4 года назад +39

    This is the hardest integral I’ve gotten right on my own! So proud of myself

  • @tomctutor
    @tomctutor 4 года назад +7

    I notice the *Feynman' technique* (aka. _Leibniz Integral Rule_ ) depends basically upon parameterizing the parts expansion here; its the _by-parts_ part that gives it the power in my opinion for what its worth!

  • @zaydabbas1609
    @zaydabbas1609 3 года назад

    This is such a pog method and this vid is amazing

  • @Mr_Mundee
    @Mr_Mundee 3 месяца назад

    you can also use the taylor series for cos(5x) and use the gamma function

  • @Patapom3
    @Patapom3 4 года назад

    Amazing!

  • @NO-vl8nq
    @NO-vl8nq 3 года назад

    Thank u 💞

  • @thaitrieu791
    @thaitrieu791 2 года назад +1

    Just saw the Gaussian integral=sqrt(pi)/2 half an hour ago in lecture hall. I didn’t know where it came from while my prof was explaining Laplace Transform of t^(-1/2). And now here… What a small world of Mathematics !

  • @thanasisconstantinou7442
    @thanasisconstantinou7442 4 года назад

    Such an elegant and clever integration technique. Bravo to Feynman and to you, of course. Very cool indeed.

  • @phill3986
    @phill3986 4 года назад

    Nice don't remember running across the Feynman technique before.

  • @chetnarayan9156
    @chetnarayan9156 2 года назад

    You didn't got views but all you got is alots of love from the lover of mathematics

  • @luanagodinho2340
    @luanagodinho2340 4 года назад +1

    Curto muito seu canal, você é fera! Brasil.

  • @rainbowiitneet6441
    @rainbowiitneet6441 4 года назад +2

    Great "sir"

  • @gourabpal5774
    @gourabpal5774 2 года назад

    Just wonderful 🤩

  • @davidm.johnston8994
    @davidm.johnston8994 4 года назад +1

    I wish I understood. Someday, maybe. Man that's orders of magnitude beyond what I can comprehend at the moment.

  • @bazwardo7191
    @bazwardo7191 3 года назад

    This is amazing

  • @kushagragupta3416
    @kushagragupta3416 3 года назад

    👀great work sir

  • @michaeledwardharris
    @michaeledwardharris 2 года назад

    That was a wild ride!

  • @matthieumoussiegt
    @matthieumoussiegt 3 года назад

    very good proof amazing use of differential equations

    • @jacobbills5002
      @jacobbills5002 3 года назад

      Just watch this impressive Math channel ruclips.net/channel/UCZDkxpcvd-T1uR65Feuj5Yg

  • @kimothefungenuis
    @kimothefungenuis 7 месяцев назад

    you can also use a Fourier transform

  • @ernstuzhansky
    @ernstuzhansky 7 месяцев назад

    Wonderful

  • @j121212100
    @j121212100 Год назад

    If there is anything I do not want to forget from my school days is it calculus. Such a beautiful form of math.

  • @antoniokokic7488
    @antoniokokic7488 2 года назад

    Can't say I understand, but I do agree: it's very nice!

  • @emiliomontes2043
    @emiliomontes2043 4 года назад

    Awesome, can u show us the demonstration? thanks !

  • @sergiolucas38
    @sergiolucas38 2 года назад

    Great video :)

  • @markproulx1472
    @markproulx1472 4 года назад

    Fabulous!

  • @DynestiGTI
    @DynestiGTI 3 года назад

    Very satisfying

  • @nishukapil4038
    @nishukapil4038 4 года назад +3

    Can you integrate from 0 to inf ln(1+ix)*(1+ix)^(-b)/(e^(2*pi*x)-1)dx?

  • @seddikio1282
    @seddikio1282 4 года назад

    Very nice

  • @shayakbardhan2064
    @shayakbardhan2064 3 года назад +1

    11:20 ...............the sentence is veryyy TRUE indeed !!!!

  • @bruno68berretta53
    @bruno68berretta53 3 года назад

    Complimenti!