Owner of an i7-12700K, on an Asus TUF Gaming Z690-Plus D4, with 32GB of DDR4 at 3600Mhz CL16. No problem at all. And, yes, the Ryzen 5 5600X, that is in my wife's computer looks more snappy at the mouse and keyboard, but that's just this. Even on the internet, the Intel is way more fast!
@@josetrigueiro5978 12th Gen does not have these same reliability issues. It does have the lag maybe because of PCH not on CPU on on mobo which is mentioned in this video. 12th Gen is in fact much more reliable than 13th and 14th Gen regarding stability. Especially DDR4. Now DDR5 XMP on other hand is another story but you are using DDR4 XMP which is smooth and stable on 12th Gen. DDR5 SPD 4800 probably ok but DDR5 XMP on 12th to 14th Gen is terrible on 4 DIMM boards especially Asus from my experience.
@@Wolverine607 I know that. My message was just a response to Savitarax who in his message mentioned the 12th generation as having the same problems as the 13th generation.
@@josetrigueiro5978-_- my initial experience on this cpu has not been that good but it ironed itself out I guess. I’m actually considering am5 next year as I think I’d benefit more from that snappiness
@@josetrigueiro5978 No IT IS Not way more fast(er) ob the Internet 😂😂😂 Tell your wife Not to watch so much porn in the Internet then the PC wont Catch so much mailware
I am glad that I have a 12th gen i5 in my gaming PC that I built in 2022. Been using it for 2 years now and have had no issues at all. The performance has been amazing even under heavy loads.
I think it's finally time for TechTube to teach users about the BIOS. It is the most untapped segment of information and countless users suffer because of it. So many issues could be resolved if people understood what is happening in their bios.
The largest issue is that there are so many names for the same settings, even across the same OEM and chipset. You can tell a person "Enable XMP" but they might have an AMD board and not realize EXPO is basically the same thing.
For my 13900k and 14900k I have done the following: MCE off, PL1 and PL2 limit to 225, limit P-core boost to 5.5 GHz and E-core boost to 4.3GHz, and use balanced power profile in Windows (although I do disable core parking to keep system highly responsive). Oh and just XMP on the RAM. I didn’t change LLC value. I have set voltage offset at a modest -0.015v and set the Core limit to 300 Amps. I have disabled the C6&C7 C states and EIST. Lastly I have locked AVX at 0 offset. I have tested on P95, CB R23 and CB R15. All great and in a mid 20 degree room, no workload exceeds 80c on package or cores. Very happy and benchmarks are very close to where they were before taming these beasts.
U made too many changes just keep the amps at 307 and 253 for pl1 and pl2 thats all u have to do i never had issues since the cpu came out i had it on launch and always configure my bios which many dont do its users fault not intel fault its like a car u have to put the bolts on the wheels dont expect it to work without fine tuning
@@fortnite360HZno it’s intel and the motherboard manufacturers fault. It is completely reasonable for buyers to expect for their products to work stable right outside the box.
Me, the main problem that manifests itself is that the mouse movement sometimes freezes, and in other cases it disconnects for a few seconds all USB connection to the computer and it is as if it restarts after a few seconds. I don't know if it is related to the i9 13900K CPU that I have in ASUS Rog Maximus Z790 Hero (latest BIOS 2301 from May 30, 2024) with Intel profiles, without any OC, and RTX Suprim X 3080 Ti, Corsair RM1000i source. Other times, games like Call Of Duty after a few minutes of playing it closes by itself for no reason and with normal temperatures (complete EKW custom liquid cooling of radiators and CPU block) without going over 75 degrees. In previous Bios (eg Bios 2002) the initial compilation of shaders sometimes crashed. With everything that is happening, could it be a CPU problem?
100% yes. Hand it over under warranty before BSODs start appearing endlessly like mine. There are more and more reports that CPU 13700k, 13900k, 14700k, 149000k are dying in large numbers.
For dummies that cannot undervolt; or bought a Corsair 4000d and the CFM intake from the front panel is too restricted for 360 radiator flow? Or the people that bought a B660/B760 as a motherboard for an upgrade path? Most people claiming this, has the x3d bug, and really want Intel to give them money back. A 7950x has the same issues with a B650. You tubers just loving clumping User error issues with something that possibly could be a default bios problem, with people that bought a BUNCH of parts.... Processors burning up, yeah voltage. System crashes, usually a lack of voltage or a driver error. Program crashes and blackouts dropping threads, improper undervoltage as well. For myself I need a Class Action, I can use Auto Undervolt in Adrenaline, and it has never successfully kept an undervolt for more than 2 hours without crashing the Adrenaline program. So when glitches have occured in the last 1.3 years of my 13700K's life, it is had Adrenaline crash behind it back to default every time.... So doubtful every issue in 2024 is Intel..... Remember Steve at GN has beat his brains out to get an overclock on every Zen released to date... Usually giving up, he is no longer on the LN2 bandwagon....
11:39 This is the main reason why learning to overclock and overclocking properly is much more safer for components long term than leaving everything stock without knowing what da hell your motherboard is doing. This is definitely NOT the way things should be but it's been the case since i had used computers. For example my Z370 from ASUS when enabling the XMP configured the VCCSA to 1.35v (overclockers recommend using 1.25v for daily). And this is one example, motherboards have this sort of practices. Vcore, VCCSA, VCCIN, any voltage... you name it. And that's only half the story, i've heard many influencers saying things like "a CPU running at 100 ºC is fine", i can assure you is not, amongs overclockers the safe margin has allways been around 85ºC.
@@Kdog307 See, I put my i9KF into a Corsair 4000d and the same 360AIO that was in a 2015 Full tower from Newegg. After the swap to the 4000d the idle went up 10C instantly almost 38C - 40C on all cores. Wasn't throttling at 5.2GHZ inside the cheap Full tower; where my 13700K sits now; in that old Full tower. It choked that 9900Kf down to 4.4Ghz before i could get it not to throttle in R23. So that case is jinxed for a 360 in the front.... Dumb thing is, that case will really need the front fans as exhaust and using a 240 AIO in the top, and get way more cooling, but your fans in the glass up front will be backward. My 13700K would never stand a chance in the Corsair 4000d.
On mine I set the following (on an i7-13700K): - Max TDP of 70'C - PL1 of 153 W - PL2 of 153 W - Disable ASUS Multicore Enhancement, choose Intel Default - Disable Thermal Velocity Boost - SVID to be Auto (Intel Baseline is way too high, about 1.7 V) I'm more interested in a quiet system than high power, nothing I do requires crazy high levels of performance. I tend to run my systems for 20+ years (I still have my P4 Win98 system for retro gaming), so silicon degradation is very important to me
if i leave my gigabyte bios on stock, i see in hw monitor when running CB23 that VCORE goes above 1.5V, temps low 90s and power draw almost 400 watts. This is after delid too. Going in and adjusting LLC and setting a fixed voltage i was able to run stock speeds at 1.27v with Turbo LLC and vcore stays pegged at that in hwmonitor. So these chips are being massively overvolted by motherboard manufacturers. Another thing to do if you dont want to run a fixed vcore you can set PL1 to 125 and PL2 to 253 watts. Dont need to adjust current limit as itll never hit 307A at stock. Also throw on a -0.075mv undervolt and its rock stable. Max temps in CB now low 70s too with a 360mm aio.
after 4 months later my I9 13900k became unstable, crashing from games and after effect renders and later i solved it by changing my asus proart z790 motherboard power settings close to intel power settings and now it is stable: pl1 253w pl2 253w 340amps
Damn Danny, I didn't know how much I needed this video. I've been chasing problems with with 13700 z790 DD5-7200 4090 system forever. Thanks for the great insight
Same I have been having these issues for months. I have updated to the latest bios with Intel's base limit still hasn't fixed my problem I think my CPU is broken. I will try getting a rma :(
1.42 volts on my i7-12700K. At 5GHz, instant 90 degrees on Cinebench with a Deepcool Assassin 3 and Corsair 5000D Airflow. I did -110mv undervolt, now is 1.23 volts max and 67 degrees.
Been having 4 seconds freeze in CS2 for the past two months, changing the bios setting to intel guideline did not help. I am changing the performance core ratio from 55 to 50 now, and lets see if the issue still occurs. Fingers crossed.
I had crashes, blue screens, and most of these issues when bench stress testing with other applications. All started with new components, and the new I-9 CPU. Finally figured out that it was the unrealistic BIOS settings by MSI. I contacted them, and ended up in arguments with them because they would not provide the correct settings for the BIOS, for normal usage and OC usage. I was shocked. Got the system all stable and running at a good performance, after changing the voltage and the current to the CPU, and undervoltng. I say the makers of the motherboards are the problem.
Could this be why the first descendant game shits itself with high pitched audio errors and constant crashing, while it was somewhat more stable on my 8 year old pc?
Hey man good video as always! Thanks for the shoutout. Yeah there are just so many variables here. PC gaming/building should not be this complex. I hope Intel can have better luck next generation with their new architecture. As for now, I'm back on AMD's AM5 and I can say that it is much better than it was a year ago. My system feels super snappy. I keep expecting to see some lag or stutter any second lol. But thankfully nothing. Phew. I'll keep you updated! Keep up the good work and so close to 20K let's go!!!!!!!
This might be a dumb question but I don’t notice anything like this on the i5 13600k cpu is it mainly i9 and some i7. As I’m listening I have done a neg offset of 73 on the cpu is that maybe why it’s not happening to me? Highest clock I allow it to hit is 5.1 I don’t OC to anything higher running ddr5 6400 cl32.
So far I don't have this issue on my setup. I just set my PL1=PL2 to 253W and ICC=307A, Enhanced Turbo=Auto and the rest is custom fan setup curve. I have an MSI MAG Z790 Tomahawk MAX WIFI7 with i9-14900K. Immediately after I finished my build I set my PL1 & PL2 to the Intel power specs and had not had any issues. Running God of War 2018 and finished the entire game with no hickups. If you set the PL1 and PL2 to the default BIOS setting which is an overkill setup, yea the PC will crash and immediately causes the BSOD or sometimes lag and memory error issues. You can set PL1=125w and PL2=253W however this will definitely reduce the performance of the CPU, so you can set it to 253W on both PL1 and PL2 and ICC=307A to run stable. Here's my settings: E-Core Turbo Ratio offset = +1 CPU Ratio Offset when Running AVX = -3 CPU Lite Load = Mode 1 (located in Advance CPU Configuration Settings) CPU Loadline Calibration Control = 5 (located in DigitALL Power Settings) CPU Core Voltage offset = 0.100 PL1 = 253W Duration=56s PL2 = 253W ICC = 307A Hope it helps anyone out there with the same MOBO and CPU. My RAM is a Corsair DDR5 RAM with 7200Mhz. So everything far runs stable. Ran OCCT for stability for 1 hour passed, with Cinebench Multi-core score is 39200, and Single Core of 2k+ I did ran LatencyReport as well and did not return any major issues.
I kept my AM4 mobo and got a 5700X just because of the 65W TDP of that CPU. I try to run my system as efficient as possible. Even though i recommended my wife a laptop with a 12600H because i know that CPU is great. I don't know why intel pushed their high end cpu's so far, having really good gems in the current i5 series.
They are linking the high end user, causing all out power burnout; with the bucket of parts builder that has poopoo for advice of hardware... Makes for a nice ploy to sell more AMD.... 13700K is a cranky cpu to an extent, but you could throw it and a 360AIO in a Corsair 4000d and cook the heck out of it, after it not throttling at all in a 2015 Newegg budget full tower PC case.... Just changing cases will add 10C to idle alone. The glass in the front makes that much difference. You'll cook a 9900KF down to 4.3 Ghz to keep it from throttling in the summer. Or run 5.1 or 5.2Ghz year around in the old cheap 2015 case. I was testing it in a 50C room, that Intel chip wasn't doing one thing to heat that room though. Even added 2 120mm to the rear of the Radiator and didn't change one number on temps.... All a flow issue.
Not once but twice I’ve gotten unlucky with my i9 14900kf cpu. Blows my mind others are having the same issues I’m having. Especially the unreal engine oodle error. Crazy.
If the pc is at defaults... crashing during such things like heavy DX12 shader compilation, out of video memory etc.. all of the bsod's i see people post are clock watchdogs or whea errors... under such situation, this is literally all just due to 100c utilization because the stock cpus/motherboards are running out with ridiculous auto AC_LL values and vcore during load aka heat induced bsod's...
I have a 13700k. I was running an all P core 5.5 oc all E cores parked for two weeks with no issues. Then one day I get constant game crashes half way through ranked COD matches. It was a little frustrating to say the least. I had to downclock the cores to 5.2 for stability. I was not running crazy voltage 1.36-1.4
I have ran into game crashes on helldivers 2 with Ryzen 7700X with stable overclock and 64GB memory. Can confirm there is a stability issue in the game itself
Wish I’d seen all these issues 3 weeks ago when I built my system, been having so many issues that I think is the 14900k. Switching it in bios to to tower cooler mode (was on water cooling by default for some reason) seems to have solved them 😅
Question, does this affect the Non K models as well? Cause what I've been reading it's all for K's. Apprently my 13700 does not exhibit this behavior for now.
My early production 13900K was experiencing issues with stuttering, crashes, large power draws at idle and, the most annoying issue is the USB ports randomly drop and reconnect. I tried 3 different motherboards, 4 different RAM brands, 3 different power supplies, BIOS revisions and settings, etc. I went back and forth with Intel and they agreed to RMA the CPU. I updated the motherboard BIOS, applied the latest ME firmware and recommended BIOS settings from Intel and Initially, the problem seemed like it was solved. Now, the USB connection issues are back and some slight stuttering is happening again. On top of all of this, the motherboard onboard 2.5Gb NIC's have always had disconnect issues (which I solved by installing a 10Gb Marvel NIC) and with all of these issues compounding, I'm done with Intel. I'll be switching to AMD when the 9950X3D comes out next month.
I have to go to Msi bios and change in under voltage my processor but now I can play without crashing but I can’t live stream or recording while I playing games not sure what I can do I want play and at same time record or livestream if you guys know better fix pls reply to me how I can fix this problem I’m using stream lab I set up stream lab properly but once I play the game and open stream lab I click record and stream lab just start to get freeze 😢
I have i9 14900k with msi z790 mag motherboard, corsair ram 2x16 7200mhz power supply 850 plus gold and enough memory for ssd hard drive and evga 3080 ftw3 graphics card
I have my i9 13900K since january 2023.I start having crashes in the beginning of 2024.Most of the games were crashing,but all the stress tests and benchmarks were running just fine.I just disable MCE and for now it's better.I pray that it will hold on for few years more,but after it will start to make problems again,i'm going back to AMD.Maybe i will try to RMA before that,but where i'm from,RMA is very difficult to solve.
Got a 14700k, for a few months it worked fine with extreme over clocking on prime z790p. Recently games would crash, but not the OS. Now I can only run on stock settings.. using a kracken 240, push pull fan setup, also had the overclock limiter set to 90c. My only guess is that the cpu fried.. also it passes cinebench just fine. Running 1000w psu... I just don't get it 😕
@@Michal_BauerMy i7-12700K was running at 1.42 volts at auto settings on my MSI motherboard. On Cinebench, it reached instant 240 watts and 90 degrees. I did a -110mv adaptative undervolt through XTU, now it's 67 degrees max and 158 watts Same perfomance scores.
I find it interesting that my manually tuned 13900KS to a 24/7 oc of 5.6ghz/4.5ghz e core in an ITX build has never experienced any of this. This could be a ram issue for some as you highlighted DDR5 is insanely annoying and not ready for the average end user but more so hardcore overclockers. I believe this is 100% a default bios issue or XMP issue. I tested my ASUS Z790I out of the box and it defaulted to 1.5v on the cpu core with vdroop. My cpu requires 1.3V to manually hit 5.6/4.5. My system is almost a year old with zero issues mentioned. Also I think it needs to be very clear that this is board partners releasing these terribly optimized voltages and not intel.
I have the 13900KS After 1 Year of Usage i became all these Issues😢😢😢😢 Even Faceit Anticheat dont work and crashes wit Bsod - KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED Wolfenstein Youngblood stuttering very much in dark places in game I disabled the Multicore Enhancement but the issues are still there😢 I can't enjoy my Pc since 2 Months😮
Not undervolting so much is one problem. But you throw ANY 360 AIO into a Corsair4000D and that case will raise your idle temps 10C with all the same settings, as in a 2015 Newegg budget Full tower... I had to take a 9900Kf down to 4.3 to get back to back runs of R23 without thermal throttling, when it would run 5.2 in a cheap case with the same 360AIO. B660 and B760's being sold as upgrade paths is another thing causing the program dropouts. Half the bios is locked for the K chips, in bios. Some of those settings go hand in hand with stability. Or even the ability to use XTU effectively. Cache voltage and speed come into play with the K cpus. I'm glad people are getting a new chip, but doubtful their chips will "Make it another day" same user....
I am glad i researched my 14900k though kinda regett getting it but to late. Anyways i found out to fix the bios fir heat snd stability. It takes a cenibench multicore test just fine.
Please help me I am using I 7 14700k processor ,motherboard gigabyte z790 , cooler 360 l coolar master liquid argb,Power supply 750 watt colloer master Graphics card 3060 gigabyte face some Throttling ,when useing stress test there are some Throttling issue ,thermal Throttling,current Throttling please help me sir can anyone help me to olve this problm please need help 😞
That’s great, if you want to have maximum performance you need to understand what is going on under the hood, not just throwing money into your build. Well done intel!
Yeah I’m having this issue right now I’m trying to figure how to fix it’s so annoying I’m getting internet browser crashes and random error load page, and random game crash I have 14th gen 14900K, 4090 and Z790 Apex Encore
there's definitely a latency issue with those intel chips, i upgraded from an old i3 and i saw no difference in the usability, it feels just as slow, the only real difference is in games and when editing, but in usability is the same or slower.
The end user should not have to go and setup their BIOS to fix issues caused by the motherboard manufacturer. Like you said, most people will just go in, enable XMP, and call it a day. Why would they even think that an overclock - that they themselves didn’t apply - would be an issue? To make this problem worse is that we, as tech enthusiasts, have been saying for the last few years that OCing isn’t as beneficial anymore as most CPUs will OC themselves. Motherboard manufacturers should have their defaults set to whatever Intel or AMD specify and nothing else. Let users who want to OC do so at their own risk - especially so given that overclocking is not generally covered under CPU warranties.
As weird as this sounds, ever since I built my 13900k z790 ddr4 4090fe, I feel like my gaming experience feels bad. Feels slow and almost laggy. Im gaming 240fps @ 1440p and it feels so weird. I'm not sure why. Maybe this will help
Try disabling hyperthreading in the bios. I disabled it because I noticed in certain games there was weird lagging like every 10 or so seconds it would stutter and disabling the hyperthreading fixed it and it is butter smooth now. This was with a i7-12700k.
I have an i9 13900KF, z790 MB. I get the out of video memory. In the BIOS, I have to select "Sync all cores" for both E and P cores. Any other setting and I get a hard freeze when idle at the desktop. This makes the CPU run about 10 deg hotter, at 46deg cel. For some games like Hogwarts, I have to quickly set the affinity to run on 4 cores only. If I dont then Hogwarts crashes when it begins to download the shaders. Everything is stable now, just have the slightly hotter idle temps and having to set affinity when launching some games.
I just Built a PC with i9-14900k and am getting blue screen. Fixed the CPU problem by manually setting Amperage an max Watts draw in MB. But never in my life dis i know the CPU supports a max Ram frequency like you put in table 8:53. So my CPU supports max 5600, my mother board max 7200, and i purchased 7000. All in all usless ram and motherboard frequency max when the CPU does not support it.
My Asus Gaming Wifi Z690 killed my 13900k in a little over a year. I had Asus MC Enhancement off, cooled by a 360 mm AIO, and temps were never crazy or above normal. A week ago, I shut down my computer and it never fired back up again, with a red CPU light on. I got the Z790 Gaming Wifi II and 64 GB of RAM now, and the 13900K refused to work on my brand new motherboard. Bought the 14700k, and the system fired right up without issue. I am still very upset that a one year old, $600 CPU is dead and I was not overclocking it, kept it always cool and dusted off, in good cases.
I am running a 12900ks and happy to say, I'm having none of these issues, it is happy to pull 320w+ with no issues, and gives me 5.2ghz ''all core'' (5.2ghz 8xPcore/4ghz 8xEcore) in game or stress test, and 5.5 single core no problems on the 2 cores that reach it lol(4+5), well except temps but, an under volt helps, and come on its a 12900ks able pull over 300w, its going to get hot lol, it also has to run 2 GPUs as I have an ARC card dedicated for OBS(streaming and recording) and an RTX for Gaming. The only ''very rare'' crashing I have, is probably more because I daily drive my RTX card with an OC of +20% on the die and +15% on the Vram lol.
I tested with both ddr4 and ddr5, also different mobo, it's intel, I have a 13900kf, worked fine for a couple of months, after that I have been getting constant BSODs, crashes and freezes, I had to downclock to x52 just to get it stable. amazing video, all the errors you spoke about, I had them
Im glad this issue is coming to light. A few weeks after 14th gen cpu came out, i had a 14900k and it was having all the same issues that is spoke about. I ended up returning it and buying a 13700k. It’s been running stable on stock settings compared to the 14900k.
I have a 14900KS, and have had much issues. So far only some games are having really bad issues with the high clock rate. So to fix this I put in intel factory settings for power and a down clock to 5.3 on my performance cores. Seems to have done the trick and temperatures are below 70c at all time. Also doesn't affect my performances in gaming that much. The memory issue was stopped by turning on re-size bar. G-sync was also crashing some games so I turned it off in the global settings. I was also changing XMP profile to lower than my rated 6000. I ended up removing a 32gb stick, in case it was creating instability. The latest Nvidia driver also created crashes so I reverted back to the one before.
@@jjlw2378 I have 20 days left to return the PC and get a new one. I'm waiting to see if a new BIOS update supporting the KS is getting released for my MOBO. If not I'll ship it back.
good marketing strategy, release CPUs heavily overclocked from the factory, so you get the good looking score numbers at the release, get more hype, more people buying it, after few months those CPUs are getting unstable from running so hard so you gotta lower the clocks, loosing performance lmao
@@COMMANDandConquer199 and who approved that? INTEL. If these are MB issues it should have happened a long time ago and to every manufacturer, the point is intel gave them the go signal to allow this so they are responsible as well.
@@DrMicoco No, Intel did not approve those. They power and clock settings are literally being set to unlimited out of the box on these boards. Intel would have to be retarded to approve that.
@@COMMANDandConquer199 wow someone WHO eat shit for real, Intel IS scaming and doing that they are Marketing Ther own CPU with the clocks now people spend 2x the amount of Money for Intel get 2x - 3x the Watt usage and less Performance then on AMD, they diserve that for Sure because they Support the Bad product in all cost. First you Had to buy a CPU frame because Intel fked IT Up now you have to clock IT down b cause Intel fked IT up awesome and the CPU still cost too much and eat too much Power awesome
Disabling hyperthreading increases the 14900K's and 14900KS's power efficiency, performance is moderately less than Hyperthreading enabled (24 Core CPU No HT VS 32 Core CPU With HT), more performance per watt and overclocking headroom with 25% to 50% better thermals.
Intels "performance+efficiency cores" is such bullshit... Imagine buying a car advertised as having 400 power, but only 50 of them are horsepowers and the rest are duckpower.
I just came yesterday from work... And started to experience crashes on callipsto protocol, battlefield v and 2042...sniper elite 5 too... I feel SCAMED 👺
I have an ASUS Z-690 E WIFI motherboard with an i9 13900 K CPU and have had no problems so far. I am running stock settings and have run some intensive benchmarks with no problems so far. Maybe I'm just lucky?
I am on my 3rth 13900k they keap braking on me with vram issues or games that used to run fine crash to desktop i got my current one for about 3 a 4months i am playing grayzone warfare and the issue of game crashing made me aware of this i feel so freaking bad because i payed alot of monny for my cpu and motherboard and cant aford to buy new motherboard when the cpu eventualy wil crash agian
Looks like i made a good choice last year when i built my first all AMD system. The only "issue" i have had was the long boot time, but that got fixed after a few BIOS updates. Other than that my PC has been working flawlessly.
I have a z790 14900k. Asus put out a mobo bios update the other day with an "intel baseline" setting. Did that then set xmp and AI overclocking. Still hits 1980 in Cinebench 24 (was getting 2170ish with MCE enabled). Xmp at 6400mt . Temps don't hit peaks higher than 87 and sit around 74c in cinebench. Boosts 2 cores to 6200 then sits at around 4800-5000 all core to get that score. Still much faster than my old 12700k, but clearly not as good as the mobo settings made people think.
I dont have any issue i have a 13900k everybody needs to change in there bios add the amps at 307 for the cpu and 253 watts for the wattage and u should not have any problems
Nice video! At 11:02 yeah about that part not all motherboards of the same brand (cough Gigabyte cough*) runs the same way following a tutorial, for example the Aorus Z390 Pro Wifi which I own won't get along with the Aorus Z390 Master and another thing the bios upgrade always changes the menu and ways the motherboard will funtion, it could be a downgrade or upgrade of the modes from their list, the point is that after following the tutorial it won't start loading windows so by the time someone with knowledge has the guts to make a Z390 pro wifi version then I'll take the step to OC my rig. For now I'll keep it at the original stock setting and not waste my money down the drain! Cheers!
I purchased a 13600kf last year after seeing the price to performance. I manually undervolted and clocked my CPU as follows. Amps - 250, Voltage short term - 160 and voltage long term - 160. I did this after reading an article claiming that based on a calculation, I cant remember the exact but, its like amp x volts = power. Feel free to correct. In it he was speaking with Intel. He was claiming that a 13600kf should only need 175 or 200 amps. It may have even been in one of Intel's specification sheets. After reading that I tried using 175 and then 200 Amps in my bios. ASUS. 175 and 200 would cause my CPU to throttle even at the rated 181 volts. Without going through all the different scenarios I tried I will say that based on temps and performance. The 250 amps and 160 volts short and long term resulted in a Cinebench score of 24250. With the CPU staying at around 70 Celsius.. I would randomly check the Cinebench scores after bios changes. Last month while checking the score dropped to 22200. Now is a 2000 drop acceptable for 11 months of use? I then tried to turn up amps and volts, overclock etc. This time the pc was crashing. I also tried turning up my ram speed. I was able to overclock 6400 to 6800 no problem. Now not even 6600. It is causing issues now, that it didn't before. Everything I just said is a long winded way of saying. THESE CPUS ARE DEGRADING. I am unable to set up my pc as I once did and recreate the same results.
There was no awareness about this. But now it’s hopefully well known. I couldn’t believe it messed up 3 different times for me and no one on the internet related with me until i tested different clockspeeds, ddr4 ram, and voltages. Im 5.2 and undervolt using Lite load modification. And im ok on 14700开was on 2 separate 13900ks before i did this
I've been watching this story with interest, I run a 13600kf but it's been undervolted since day 1, I do a lot of sim racing and get extremely consistent frame rates and timings, I've certainly never noticed frame drops or stuttering and I haven't had any crashes, it is a very stable system at either 5.5GHz all P cores (most used OC) 5.8GHz all P cores or even 6.0GHz on two P cores and 5.8GHz on the rest. I think Intel or mobo manufacturers were a little optimistic with the voltages.
Does undervolting the CPU mitigate this issue? I have a 147000K running the MSI stock overclock with XMP undervolted 0.070 negative offset. and DDR5 memory at 6000. Am I at risk of getting this problem?
Undervolting without also decreasing the frequency a bit can also bring instability. Especially with worse binned chips. You should do some stability testing first and not just on the CPU, but the memory as well as they are interlinked.
of degradation? no, not really... but you may have instability due to lack of voltage. that will not harm the cpu in any way but you may eventually get errors or crashes
undervolting is only one portion of the pie -- if the chip is still pulling amps (watts), its still going to heat up. You need to set the power limits. just for reference, I too am running an undervolt offset, on an MSI z690, but DDR4 board. I set the offset (for me, -0.085), then set the clocks to auto, LLC3 (or 4) set the intel 253w limit on both LONG and SHORT. the seconds don't matter. set the amp limit to 400A. This is on a 360mm AIO Arctic Frozer II... cinebench R23 putting out 2.3-2.4k single core, and 35-36k multicore. CPU-Z single core was 965 if I remember right, don't remember what Multi was.
I degraded my 6700 K by OC it to 5.3 ghz at close to 0 degrees and well after that I had to downclock it to 4.7 ghz vs the 4.8 it ran before but its been running the 4.7 for the better part of 7 years now. I wonder with these chips degrading so fast if with the down clocking the AMD chips at the same speed will be crushing them in games?
I have 13700k for about 2 year I have not have any issues with the CPU I've had my powerlimit set day one when I got it as for my ram its 64gb 3600mhz its been stable for me
I've had freezes lately but its related to the trash IME drivers from Intel. I've had freezes from 1 second to 20 seconds after logon. I've installed different IME drivers and it highly affects the stutters. Downclocking or adjusting voltage doesnt affect the stutters, but sometimes it does because its a bit random how the IME drivers loads at logon I think. Pch chip temp is also a problem, they often have to small heatsinks creating dropouts on usb etc. The undervolt the pch voltage to get away with a too small heatsink. When the pch chip dumps all the heat into the mb the ram signals is also affected. The heat affects the pcb traces increasing the resistance so your ram oc is no longer stable. Try to keep the Pch chip under 65C.
display control logic in the middle e cores also in the middle inter connect pass for fabric so technically everything can talk to everything , quad channel memory boom even IGPU's will work good
The thing is what i am gonna do with the CPU if I get a new I9 13k it will get broken in 2 month so I cant do that. Get a Lower CPU? Well I payed for a high end CPU and still want one in my rig. And to buy a AMD CPU would mean also to change the Motherboard... What a Dilemma
my cpu is a fiew days old it crashes not the game its imediatelly shuts down my pc. Even if undervoltet (offset - 0.085) the only way its not happening anymore is max. 5.4 ghz. But i reduced to 5.1 ghz. since then no issues, but i haven't a long term record, so i may switch to 7800x3d - imagine i would be on a doctor work 🤔 Intel was known for reliability, guess not anymore
Because mobo makers aren’t locking down the specs out of a desire to get high bench scores. It’s not a CPU thing it’s an industry thing around overclocking hardware.
Nice Vid! Have you noticed the increase of voltage in the last apex BIOS version that you mentioned? Im one of those who don’t want to run XMP because the SPD writing don’t consider voltages for the CPU side. So, even an external controller must have the right voltage. So, board parters set SA in auto and even worse, CPUVDDQ2 at very high levels like 1.35, which is wrong. You don’t want what a 8200/8400 run XMP at 1.4v VDD/VDDQ. There’s no understanding or knowledge in the community about DDR5 and how it trains and work. Many Techtubers not only do not know, but they misinform the community, such as Buildzoid. I'm sorry he got into this topic. Instead of reading data sheets, he could have learned with Futurplus or also with some BIOSdev, but he does not manage relationships in his timings, he only works with (low) registers. It is not easy, but it is possible to reduce the voltages (lower) than an XMP profile, and not have stability problems. Finally, many users use fixed voltages with LLC6, limiting the core clocks, without allowing droop to exist, but for light loads they have excess current. The CPU must have its boost capacity, and depending on the quality of the silicon, limit the PLs, ICCMAX, IVR to avoid degradation.
Very strange behavior of the processor, interesting that most of them work without problems for 2-3 months, then the problems start, that is, something happens, it changes within this period of 3 months.
With how pushed to the absolute limit these chips were on 12th and 13th gen.
It’s not surprising to me.
Owner of an i7-12700K, on an Asus TUF Gaming Z690-Plus D4, with 32GB of DDR4 at 3600Mhz CL16. No problem at all. And, yes, the Ryzen 5 5600X, that is in my wife's computer looks more snappy at the mouse and keyboard, but that's just this. Even on the internet, the Intel is way more fast!
@@josetrigueiro5978 12th Gen does not have these same reliability issues. It does have the lag maybe because of PCH not on CPU on on mobo which is mentioned in this video. 12th Gen is in fact much more reliable than 13th and 14th Gen regarding stability. Especially DDR4. Now DDR5 XMP on other hand is another story but you are using DDR4 XMP which is smooth and stable on 12th Gen. DDR5 SPD 4800 probably ok but DDR5 XMP on 12th to 14th Gen is terrible on 4 DIMM boards especially Asus from my experience.
@@Wolverine607 I know that. My message was just a response to Savitarax who in his message mentioned the 12th generation as having the same problems as the 13th generation.
@@josetrigueiro5978-_- my initial experience on this cpu has not been that good but it ironed itself out I guess. I’m actually considering am5 next year as I think I’d benefit more from that snappiness
@@josetrigueiro5978 No IT IS Not way more fast(er) ob the Internet 😂😂😂
Tell your wife Not to watch so much porn in the Internet then the PC wont Catch so much mailware
I am glad that I have a 12th gen i5 in my gaming PC that I built in 2022. Been using it for 2 years now and have had no issues at all. The performance has been amazing even under heavy loads.
I think it's finally time for TechTube to teach users about the BIOS. It is the most untapped segment of information and countless users suffer because of it. So many issues could be resolved if people understood what is happening in their bios.
There's plenty of videos on RUclips I've got loads on my channel
@@toonnut1 Nice! I'll check them out.
@jjlw2378 no problem 👍
The largest issue is that there are so many names for the same settings, even across the same OEM and chipset. You can tell a person "Enable XMP" but they might have an AMD board and not realize EXPO is basically the same thing.
For my 13900k and 14900k I have done the following: MCE off, PL1 and PL2 limit to 225, limit P-core boost to 5.5 GHz and E-core boost to 4.3GHz, and use balanced power profile in Windows (although I do disable core parking to keep system highly responsive). Oh and just XMP on the RAM. I didn’t change LLC value. I have set voltage offset at a modest -0.015v and set the Core limit to 300 Amps. I have disabled the C6&C7 C states and EIST. Lastly I have locked AVX at 0 offset. I have tested on P95, CB R23 and CB R15. All great and in a mid 20 degree room, no workload exceeds 80c on package or cores. Very happy and benchmarks are very close to where they were before taming these beasts.
U made too many changes just keep the amps at 307 and 253 for pl1 and pl2 thats all u have to do i never had issues since the cpu came out i had it on launch and always configure my bios which many dont do its users fault not intel fault its like a car u have to put the bolts on the wheels dont expect it to work without fine tuning
@@fortnite360HZ okay thanks for the advice I will try that.
i would do a restore default save it then go back and make the changes just to make sure u have your settings intact
@@a120068020 Factory default the bios then go make the changes
@@fortnite360HZno it’s intel and the motherboard manufacturers fault. It is completely reasonable for buyers to expect for their products to work stable right outside the box.
What did you think was eventually going to happen with all these forced Motherboard bios security Mitigations. I believe this is part of The problem.
Me, the main problem that manifests itself is that the mouse movement sometimes freezes, and in other cases it disconnects for a few seconds all USB connection to the computer and it is as if it restarts after a few seconds. I don't know if it is related to the i9 13900K CPU that I have in ASUS Rog Maximus Z790 Hero (latest BIOS 2301 from May 30, 2024) with Intel profiles, without any OC, and RTX Suprim X 3080 Ti, Corsair RM1000i source.
Other times, games like Call Of Duty after a few minutes of playing it closes by itself for no reason and with normal temperatures (complete EKW custom liquid cooling of radiators and CPU block) without going over 75 degrees. In previous Bios (eg Bios 2002) the initial compilation of shaders sometimes crashed.
With everything that is happening, could it be a CPU problem?
100% yes. Hand it over under warranty before BSODs start appearing endlessly like mine. There are more and more reports that CPU 13700k, 13900k, 14700k, 149000k are dying in large numbers.
class action lawsuit when?
For dummies that cannot undervolt; or bought a Corsair 4000d and the CFM intake from the front panel is too restricted for 360 radiator flow?
Or the people that bought a B660/B760 as a motherboard for an upgrade path?
Most people claiming this, has the x3d bug, and really want Intel to give them money back.
A 7950x has the same issues with a B650.
You tubers just loving clumping User error issues with something that possibly could be a default bios problem, with people that bought a BUNCH of parts....
Processors burning up, yeah voltage.
System crashes, usually a lack of voltage or a driver error.
Program crashes and blackouts dropping threads, improper undervoltage as well.
For myself I need a Class Action, I can use Auto Undervolt in Adrenaline, and it has never successfully kept an undervolt for more than 2 hours without crashing the Adrenaline program.
So when glitches have occured in the last 1.3 years of my 13700K's life, it is had Adrenaline crash behind it back to default every time.... So doubtful every issue in 2024 is Intel.....
Remember Steve at GN has beat his brains out to get an overclock on every Zen released to date... Usually giving up, he is no longer on the LN2 bandwagon....
For a unstable overclock? Are you high?
For what? I enjoy overclocking as much as the next guy, but it explicitly voids your warranty.
Never gonna happen. The wording they use for specs make it unlikely.
@@0MeALot0 im high a.f.
mobo manfacturers BIOS were insane going over far over power limit CPU specs
It normal 😂 the always do that but intel puss to hard and some chips can't do that or if the can only for a time then got to down clock it
@@Oliver-sn4beIs not normal, do you remember the exploding 7800X3D chips?
@@saricubra2867 that was the motherboard not the chip it self to much power at once
@@saricubra2867 but here intel can handle the power but the issue is the chip it self
@@Oliver-sn4be both, defective chips and motherboard issues.
11:39 This is the main reason why learning to overclock and overclocking properly is much more safer for components long term than leaving everything stock without knowing what da hell your motherboard is doing. This is definitely NOT the way things should be but it's been the case since i had used computers.
For example my Z370 from ASUS when enabling the XMP configured the VCCSA to 1.35v (overclockers recommend using 1.25v for daily). And this is one example, motherboards have this sort of practices. Vcore, VCCSA, VCCIN, any voltage... you name it.
And that's only half the story, i've heard many influencers saying things like "a CPU running at 100 ºC is fine", i can assure you is not, amongs overclockers the safe margin has allways been around 85ºC.
mine never hits 70c for longevity reasons 9900k at 4.6
And a B660 or a B760 isn't an upgrade path.
@@Kdog307 See, I put my i9KF into a Corsair 4000d and the same 360AIO that was in a 2015 Full tower from Newegg. After the swap to the 4000d the idle went up 10C instantly almost 38C - 40C on all cores.
Wasn't throttling at 5.2GHZ inside the cheap Full tower; where my 13700K sits now; in that old Full tower.
It choked that 9900Kf down to 4.4Ghz before i could get it not to throttle in R23. So that case is jinxed for a 360 in the front....
Dumb thing is, that case will really need the front fans as exhaust and using a 240 AIO in the top, and get way more cooling, but your fans in the glass up front will be backward.
My 13700K would never stand a chance in the Corsair 4000d.
On many cpu the ram oc stability gets worse already above 84C.
On mine I set the following (on an i7-13700K):
- Max TDP of 70'C
- PL1 of 153 W
- PL2 of 153 W
- Disable ASUS Multicore Enhancement, choose Intel Default
- Disable Thermal Velocity Boost
- SVID to be Auto (Intel Baseline is way too high, about 1.7 V)
I'm more interested in a quiet system than high power, nothing I do requires crazy high levels of performance. I tend to run my systems for 20+ years (I still have my P4 Win98 system for retro gaming), so silicon degradation is very important to me
if i leave my gigabyte bios on stock, i see in hw monitor when running CB23 that VCORE goes above 1.5V, temps low 90s and power draw almost 400 watts. This is after delid too. Going in and adjusting LLC and setting a fixed voltage i was able to run stock speeds at 1.27v with Turbo LLC and vcore stays pegged at that in hwmonitor. So these chips are being massively overvolted by motherboard manufacturers. Another thing to do if you dont want to run a fixed vcore you can set PL1 to 125 and PL2 to 253 watts. Dont need to adjust current limit as itll never hit 307A at stock. Also throw on a -0.075mv undervolt and its rock stable. Max temps in CB now low 70s too with a 360mm aio.
after 4 months later my I9 13900k became unstable, crashing from games and after effect renders and later i solved it by changing my asus proart z790 motherboard power settings close to intel power settings and now it is stable:
pl1 253w
pl2 253w
340amps
Damn Danny, I didn't know how much I needed this video. I've been chasing problems with with 13700 z790 DD5-7200 4090 system forever. Thanks for the great insight
Same I have been having these issues for months. I have updated to the latest bios with Intel's base limit still hasn't fixed my problem I think my CPU is broken. I will try getting a rma :(
I had to RMA it
Not surprised. Auto voltage on mobo puts 1.45-1.5 V through these.
Those are Pentium 4 voltages 😂
1.42 volts on my i7-12700K. At 5GHz, instant 90 degrees on Cinebench with a Deepcool Assassin 3 and Corsair 5000D Airflow.
I did -110mv undervolt, now is 1.23 volts max and 67 degrees.
I have i9 14th you just have to adjust some bios options to work perfectly
Agreed
Been having 4 seconds freeze in CS2 for the past two months, changing the bios setting to intel guideline did not help. I am changing the performance core ratio from 55 to 50 now, and lets see if the issue still occurs. Fingers crossed.
It’s now officially recognized by Intel… all 13th and 14th gen affected!
I had crashes, blue screens, and most of these issues when bench stress testing with other applications. All started with new components, and the new I-9 CPU. Finally figured out that it was the unrealistic BIOS settings by MSI. I contacted them, and ended up in arguments with them because they would not provide the correct settings for the BIOS, for normal usage and OC usage. I was shocked. Got the system all stable and running at a good performance, after changing the voltage and the current to the CPU, and undervoltng. I say the makers of the motherboards are the problem.
Could this be why the first descendant game shits itself with high pitched audio errors and constant crashing, while it was somewhat more stable on my 8 year old pc?
Is this problem come when we unlocked processor?
If we use without unlock 13700k processor then it's work properly or not?
Please let me know
Hey man good video as always! Thanks for the shoutout. Yeah there are just so many variables here. PC gaming/building should not be this complex. I hope Intel can have better luck next generation with their new architecture. As for now, I'm back on AMD's AM5 and I can say that it is much better than it was a year ago. My system feels super snappy. I keep expecting to see some lag or stutter any second lol. But thankfully nothing. Phew. I'll keep you updated! Keep up the good work and so close to 20K let's go!!!!!!!
No luck required. Just back up with the aggressive clocks and tell mobo manufacturers to get their shit together.
This might be a dumb question but I don’t notice anything like this on the i5 13600k cpu is it mainly i9 and some i7. As I’m listening I have done a neg offset of 73 on the cpu is that maybe why it’s not happening to me? Highest clock I allow it to hit is 5.1 I don’t OC to anything higher running ddr5 6400 cl32.
So far I don't have this issue on my setup. I just set my PL1=PL2 to 253W and ICC=307A, Enhanced Turbo=Auto and the rest is custom fan setup curve. I have an MSI MAG Z790 Tomahawk MAX WIFI7 with i9-14900K. Immediately after I finished my build I set my PL1 & PL2 to the Intel power specs and had not had any issues. Running God of War 2018 and finished the entire game with no hickups. If you set the PL1 and PL2 to the default BIOS setting which is an overkill setup, yea the PC will crash and immediately causes the BSOD or sometimes lag and memory error issues. You can set PL1=125w and PL2=253W however this will definitely reduce the performance of the CPU, so you can set it to 253W on both PL1 and PL2 and ICC=307A to run stable.
Here's my settings:
E-Core Turbo Ratio offset = +1
CPU Ratio Offset when Running AVX = -3
CPU Lite Load = Mode 1 (located in Advance CPU Configuration Settings)
CPU Loadline Calibration Control = 5 (located in DigitALL Power Settings)
CPU Core Voltage offset = 0.100
PL1 = 253W
Duration=56s
PL2 = 253W
ICC = 307A
Hope it helps anyone out there with the same MOBO and CPU. My RAM is a Corsair DDR5 RAM with 7200Mhz. So everything far runs stable. Ran OCCT for stability for 1 hour passed, with Cinebench Multi-core score is 39200, and Single Core of 2k+
I did ran LatencyReport as well and did not return any major issues.
I kept my AM4 mobo and got a 5700X just because of the 65W TDP of that CPU. I try to run my system as efficient as possible. Even though i recommended my wife a laptop with a 12600H because i know that CPU is great. I don't know why intel pushed their high end cpu's so far, having really good gems in the current i5 series.
They are linking the high end user, causing all out power burnout; with the bucket of parts builder that has poopoo for advice of hardware... Makes for a nice ploy to sell more AMD....
13700K is a cranky cpu to an extent, but you could throw it and a 360AIO in a Corsair 4000d and cook the heck out of it, after it not throttling at all in a 2015 Newegg budget full tower PC case.... Just changing cases will add 10C to idle alone. The glass in the front makes that much difference. You'll cook a 9900KF down to 4.3 Ghz to keep it from throttling in the summer. Or run 5.1 or 5.2Ghz year around in the old cheap 2015 case.
I was testing it in a 50C room, that Intel chip wasn't doing one thing to heat that room though. Even added 2 120mm to the rear of the Radiator and didn't change one number on temps.... All a flow issue.
Not once but twice I’ve gotten unlucky with my i9 14900kf cpu. Blows my mind others are having the same issues I’m having. Especially the unreal engine oodle error. Crazy.
Same
😢😢 that reason why my unreal engine is unstable 😭😔😔😭😔 how to fix my i714700k with asus prime a z790 please help
If the pc is at defaults... crashing during such things like heavy DX12 shader compilation, out of video memory etc.. all of the bsod's i see people post are clock watchdogs or whea errors... under such situation, this is literally all just due to 100c utilization because the stock cpus/motherboards are running out with ridiculous auto AC_LL values and vcore during load aka heat induced bsod's...
I have a 13700k. I was running an all P core 5.5 oc all E cores parked for two weeks with no issues. Then one day I get constant game crashes half way through ranked COD matches. It was a little frustrating to say the least. I had to downclock the cores to 5.2 for stability. I was not running crazy voltage 1.36-1.4
just because it says 1.4v doesnt mean it didnt go past that gurantee your cpu has degraded because auto vcore.. lesson learned.
I ran into these issues on the release of tekken 8 and even errors in helldivers and oncehuman I run a 13900k for my main rig.
I have ran into game crashes on helldivers 2 with Ryzen 7700X with stable overclock and 64GB memory. Can confirm there is a stability issue in the game itself
@@jcgongavoe337 true it doesnt even start for me it just blackscreens I wish I can play it again though its kind of a comfort game though
@@jcgongavoe337 Are you running ddr5 theres also issues with that as well
Wish I’d seen all these issues 3 weeks ago when I built my system, been having so many issues that I think is the 14900k. Switching it in bios to to tower cooler mode (was on water cooling by default for some reason) seems to have solved them 😅
Question, does this affect the Non K models as well? Cause what I've been reading it's all for K's. Apprently my 13700 does not exhibit this behavior for now.
it's exactly 1 year old
My early production 13900K was experiencing issues with stuttering, crashes, large power draws at idle and, the most annoying issue is the USB ports randomly drop and reconnect. I tried 3 different motherboards, 4 different RAM brands, 3 different power supplies, BIOS revisions and settings, etc. I went back and forth with Intel and they agreed to RMA the CPU. I updated the motherboard BIOS, applied the latest ME firmware and recommended BIOS settings from Intel and Initially, the problem seemed like it was solved. Now, the USB connection issues are back and some slight stuttering is happening again. On top of all of this, the motherboard onboard 2.5Gb NIC's have always had disconnect issues (which I solved by installing a 10Gb Marvel NIC) and with all of these issues compounding, I'm done with Intel. I'll be switching to AMD when the 9950X3D comes out next month.
Is the i7-13700HX also affected by this crap ? It does not boost past 5Ghz like upper tier cpus
I have to go to Msi bios and change in under voltage my processor but now I can play without crashing but I can’t live stream or recording while I playing games not sure what I can do I want play and at same time record or livestream if you guys know better fix pls reply to me how I can fix this problem I’m using stream lab I set up stream lab properly but once I play the game and open stream lab I click record and stream lab just start to get freeze 😢
I have i9 14900k with msi z790 mag motherboard, corsair ram 2x16 7200mhz power supply 850 plus gold and enough memory for ssd hard drive and evga 3080 ftw3 graphics card
I have my i9 13900K since january 2023.I start having crashes in the beginning of 2024.Most of the games were crashing,but all the stress tests and benchmarks were running just fine.I just disable MCE and for now it's better.I pray that it will hold on for few years more,but after it will start to make
problems again,i'm going back to AMD.Maybe i will try to RMA before that,but where i'm from,RMA is very difficult to solve.
How about the laptop version?
Got a 14700k, for a few months it worked fine with extreme over clocking on prime z790p. Recently games would crash, but not the OS. Now I can only run on stock settings.. using a kracken 240, push pull fan setup, also had the overclock limiter set to 90c. My only guess is that the cpu fried.. also it passes cinebench just fine. Running 1000w psu... I just don't get it 😕
Why have your PL1 state set to 253W when you could have it set to 125W for even better temps and overall efficiency at barely any cost to performance?
First thing I did after buying 13600K. And I said to myself that I will undervolt it someday later. And of course was to lazy to ever do it.
@@Michal_BauerMy i7-12700K was running at 1.42 volts at auto settings on my MSI motherboard. On Cinebench, it reached instant 240 watts and 90 degrees.
I did a -110mv adaptative undervolt through XTU, now it's 67 degrees max and 158 watts Same perfomance scores.
@@Michal_BauerI set PL1 and PL2 power limits on my BIOS to 190 watts (the maximum on Intel's specs).
I find it interesting that my manually tuned 13900KS to a 24/7 oc of 5.6ghz/4.5ghz e core in an ITX build has never experienced any of this. This could be a ram issue for some as you highlighted DDR5 is insanely annoying and not ready for the average end user but more so hardcore overclockers. I believe this is 100% a default bios issue or XMP issue. I tested my ASUS Z790I out of the box and it defaulted to 1.5v on the cpu core with vdroop. My cpu requires 1.3V to manually hit 5.6/4.5. My system is almost a year old with zero issues mentioned. Also I think it needs to be very clear that this is board partners releasing these terribly optimized voltages and not intel.
I have the 13900KS
After 1 Year of Usage i became all these Issues😢😢😢😢
Even Faceit Anticheat dont work and crashes wit Bsod - KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED
Wolfenstein Youngblood stuttering very much in dark places in game
I disabled the Multicore Enhancement but the issues are still there😢
I can't enjoy my Pc since 2 Months😮
Not undervolting so much is one problem. But you throw ANY 360 AIO into a Corsair4000D and that case will raise your idle temps 10C with all the same settings, as in a 2015 Newegg budget Full tower...
I had to take a 9900Kf down to 4.3 to get back to back runs of R23 without thermal throttling, when it would run 5.2 in a cheap case with the same 360AIO.
B660 and B760's being sold as upgrade paths is another thing causing the program dropouts. Half the bios is locked for the K chips, in bios. Some of those settings go hand in hand with stability. Or even the ability to use XTU effectively.
Cache voltage and speed come into play with the K cpus.
I'm glad people are getting a new chip, but doubtful their chips will "Make it another day" same user....
I was complaining that my prebuilt with 13th gen was slow... but at least it doesn't crash
Having issues with my rtx 3060 OC GPU. Getting stuttering and checkerboard.
I am glad i researched my 14900k though kinda regett getting it but to late. Anyways i found out to fix the bios fir heat snd stability. It takes a cenibench multicore test just fine.
How
@@madclone84 well set pw1 and pw2 to 255 abd max amps to 307 I can run 3d slicing stuff without ever throttling
Need a class action. I have to run my 13900k at 90W capped or else it gets too hot to use.
Please help me I am using I 7 14700k processor ,motherboard gigabyte z790 , cooler 360 l coolar master liquid argb,Power supply 750 watt colloer master Graphics card 3060 gigabyte face some Throttling ,when useing stress test there are some Throttling issue ,thermal Throttling,current Throttling please help me sir can anyone help me to olve this problm please need help 😞
That’s great, if you want to have maximum performance you need to understand what is going on under the hood, not just throwing money into your build. Well done intel!
Yeah I’m having this issue right now I’m trying to figure how to fix it’s so annoying I’m getting internet browser crashes and random error load page, and random game crash I have 14th gen 14900K, 4090 and Z790 Apex Encore
there's definitely a latency issue with those intel chips, i upgraded from an old i3 and i saw no difference in the usability, it feels just as slow, the only real difference is in games and when editing, but in usability is the same or slower.
This BIOS update is required to solve the problem of 13th and 14th generation processors. I have this cpu cpu13600kf
The end user should not have to go and setup their BIOS to fix issues caused by the motherboard manufacturer.
Like you said, most people will just go in, enable XMP, and call it a day. Why would they even think that an overclock - that they themselves didn’t apply - would be an issue?
To make this problem worse is that we, as tech enthusiasts, have been saying for the last few years that OCing isn’t as beneficial anymore as most CPUs will OC themselves. Motherboard manufacturers should have their defaults set to whatever Intel or AMD specify and nothing else. Let users who want to OC do so at their own risk - especially so given that overclocking is not generally covered under CPU warranties.
Plug and play is all i wanted with my 14900k chip but i couldn’t even do that. Returned it and got a 13700k, no issues.
XMP is not stock, it's a memory overclock and can damage the CPU.
Stock is JEDEC.
@@saricubra2867 XMP and OC the processor the way motherboards manufacturers are doing are two different things.
thats only for the 13/14900k? or is for the lower tiers aswell?
It does slightly affect the 13700K and 14700K too, but very little compared to i9s. It does not affect i5's and i3's.
As weird as this sounds, ever since I built my 13900k z790 ddr4 4090fe, I feel like my gaming experience feels bad. Feels slow and almost laggy. Im gaming 240fps @ 1440p and it feels so weird. I'm not sure why. Maybe this will help
Try disabling hyperthreading in the bios. I disabled it because I noticed in certain games there was weird lagging like every 10 or so seconds it would stutter and disabling the hyperthreading fixed it and it is butter smooth now. This was with a i7-12700k.
Lower your clock speeds in the bios for specific tasks such as gaming. 5 GHz to 5.20 GHz is good then raise it back up for everything else.
I have an i9 13900KF, z790 MB. I get the out of video memory. In the BIOS, I have to select "Sync all cores" for both E and P cores. Any other setting and I get a hard freeze when idle at the desktop. This makes the CPU run about 10 deg hotter, at 46deg cel. For some games like Hogwarts, I have to quickly set the affinity to run on 4 cores only. If I dont then Hogwarts crashes when it begins to download the shaders. Everything is stable now, just have the slightly hotter idle temps and having to set affinity when launching some games.
I just Built a PC with i9-14900k and am getting blue screen. Fixed the CPU problem by manually setting Amperage an max Watts draw in MB. But never in my life dis i know the CPU supports a max Ram frequency like you put in table 8:53. So my CPU supports max 5600, my mother board max 7200, and i purchased 7000. All in all usless ram and motherboard frequency max when the CPU does not support it.
My Asus Gaming Wifi Z690 killed my 13900k in a little over a year. I had Asus MC Enhancement off, cooled by a 360 mm AIO, and temps were never crazy or above normal. A week ago, I shut down my computer and it never fired back up again, with a red CPU light on. I got the Z790 Gaming Wifi II and 64 GB of RAM now, and the 13900K refused to work on my brand new motherboard. Bought the 14700k, and the system fired right up without issue. I am still very upset that a one year old, $600 CPU is dead and I was not overclocking it, kept it always cool and dusted off, in good cases.
I am running a 12900ks and happy to say, I'm having none of these issues, it is happy to pull 320w+ with no issues, and gives me 5.2ghz ''all core'' (5.2ghz 8xPcore/4ghz 8xEcore) in game or stress test, and 5.5 single core no problems on the 2 cores that reach it lol(4+5), well except temps but, an under volt helps, and come on its a 12900ks able pull over 300w, its going to get hot lol, it also has to run 2 GPUs as I have an ARC card dedicated for OBS(streaming and recording) and an RTX for Gaming. The only ''very rare'' crashing I have, is probably more because I daily drive my RTX card with an OC of +20% on the die and +15% on the Vram lol.
Does 14400F facing this same issue sir?
I had to lower my cores down to 36 or 32 depending on games with i9 14900k
I had a failed 13700k that would crash running latencymon.exe at full IDLE otherwise.
I tested with both ddr4 and ddr5, also different mobo, it's intel, I have a 13900kf, worked fine for a couple of months, after that I have been getting constant BSODs, crashes and freezes, I had to downclock to x52 just to get it stable.
amazing video, all the errors you spoke about, I had them
How happy i am with my Ryzen 5700X3D upgrade 1 month ago. Also upgraded my ram to 32GB. Easy
Im glad this issue is coming to light. A few weeks after 14th gen cpu came out, i had a 14900k and it was having all the same issues that is spoke about.
I ended up returning it and buying a 13700k. It’s been running stable on stock settings compared to the 14900k.
My 13700k is not behaving well :(
@@thealien_ali3382 what issue are you having?
I have a 14900KS, and have had much issues. So far only some games are having really bad issues with the high clock rate. So to fix this I put in intel factory settings for power and a down clock to 5.3 on my performance cores. Seems to have done the trick and temperatures are below 70c at all time. Also doesn't affect my performances in gaming that much. The memory issue was stopped by turning on re-size bar. G-sync was also crashing some games so I turned it off in the global settings. I was also changing XMP profile to lower than my rated 6000. I ended up removing a 32gb stick, in case it was creating instability. The latest Nvidia driver also created crashes so I reverted back to the one before.
Do not settle for that. RMA or return that CPU. A 14900KS at 5.3ghz is ridiculous.
@@jjlw2378 I have 20 days left to return the PC and get a new one. I'm waiting to see if a new BIOS update supporting the KS is getting released for my MOBO. If not I'll ship it back.
good marketing strategy, release CPUs heavily overclocked from the factory, so you get the good looking score numbers at the release, get more hype, more people buying it, after few months those CPUs are getting unstable from running so hard so you gotta lower the clocks, loosing performance lmao
You do realize that it's the mobo manufacturers coming with the overclock settings out of the box, not the chips themselves, right?
@@COMMANDandConquer199 and who approved that? INTEL. If these are MB issues it should have happened a long time ago and to every manufacturer, the point is intel gave them the go signal to allow this so they are responsible as well.
@@DrMicoco No, Intel did not approve those. They power and clock settings are literally being set to unlimited out of the box on these boards. Intel would have to be retarded to approve that.
@@COMMANDandConquer199 wow someone WHO eat shit for real, Intel IS scaming and doing that they are Marketing Ther own CPU with the clocks now people spend 2x the amount of Money for Intel get 2x - 3x the Watt usage and less Performance then on AMD, they diserve that for Sure because they Support the Bad product in all cost.
First you Had to buy a CPU frame because Intel fked IT Up now you have to clock IT down b cause Intel fked IT up awesome and the CPU still cost too much and eat too much Power awesome
Disabling hyperthreading increases the 14900K's and 14900KS's power efficiency, performance is moderately less than Hyperthreading enabled (24 Core CPU No HT VS 32 Core CPU With HT), more performance per watt and overclocking headroom with 25% to 50% better thermals.
Intels "performance+efficiency cores" is such bullshit... Imagine buying a car advertised as having 400 power, but only 50 of them are horsepowers and the rest are duckpower.
Due to Bios updates. I Rolled back to 1801 on my Asus Rog Strix z790, and it became stable again, i had to disable AI overclocking
I just came yesterday from work... And started to experience crashes on callipsto protocol, battlefield v and 2042...sniper elite 5 too... I feel SCAMED 👺
I have an ASUS Z-690 E WIFI motherboard with an i9 13900 K CPU and have had no problems so far. I am running stock settings and have run some intensive benchmarks with no problems so far. Maybe I'm just lucky?
2:38 - NO, Intel didnt detach input-output hub. Is it Microsoft to blame here. They are the ones who enabled HVCI by default from 12gen Intel onwards.
I am on my 3rth 13900k they keap braking on me with vram issues or games that used to run fine crash to desktop i got my current one for about 3 a 4months i am playing grayzone warfare and the issue of game crashing made me aware of this i feel so freaking bad because i payed alot of monny for my cpu and motherboard and cant aford to buy new motherboard when the cpu eventualy wil crash agian
So what should I do to the 14900kf if it buy it ? Or should I not even buy it at all ?
Honestly don't. I got a used 13900ks and its conatant bsods.
Just wait for intel 15th gen coming in a few months
@@artemis3736 😢 noted
hmmm. i had bsods before and fixed it in bios :3 no oc or undervolt. only xmp (didnt update bios about 3 monthes)
still strange that some times i saw 6 HZ on 13900ks first half a year of use. of use with wrong pc fans setup....
@@artemis3736 15th gen will probably have to same problem lmao
Been having these issues with my 13900k a couple months ago
My 13900k even lags just switching songs in Spotify. 🤒
What when you buy this cpu 😮
I have same cpu but I don't have any problem
Looks like i made a good choice last year when i built my first all AMD system. The only "issue" i have had was the long boot time, but that got fixed after a few BIOS updates. Other than that my PC has been working flawlessly.
I have a z790 14900k. Asus put out a mobo bios update the other day with an "intel baseline" setting. Did that then set xmp and AI overclocking. Still hits 1980 in Cinebench 24 (was getting 2170ish with MCE enabled). Xmp at 6400mt . Temps don't hit peaks higher than 87 and sit around 74c in cinebench. Boosts 2 cores to 6200 then sits at around 4800-5000 all core to get that score. Still much faster than my old 12700k, but clearly not as good as the mobo settings made people think.
I wonder if this is ddr5 issue.
I dont have any issue i have a 13900k everybody needs to change in there bios add the amps at 307 for the cpu and 253 watts for the wattage and u should not have any problems
Nice video! At 11:02 yeah about that part not all motherboards of the same brand (cough Gigabyte cough*) runs the same way following a tutorial, for example the Aorus Z390 Pro Wifi which I own won't get along with the Aorus Z390 Master and another thing the bios upgrade always changes the menu and ways the motherboard will funtion, it could be a downgrade or upgrade of the modes from their list, the point is that after following the tutorial it won't start loading windows so by the time someone with knowledge has the guts to make a Z390 pro wifi version then I'll take the step to OC my rig. For now I'll keep it at the original stock setting and not waste my money down the drain! Cheers!
My 13700k using ddr4 has been fine. The only issues I've had is the wifi on my z790 motherboard.
I purchased a 13600kf last year after seeing the price to performance. I manually undervolted and clocked my CPU as follows. Amps - 250, Voltage short term - 160 and voltage long term - 160. I did this after reading an article claiming that based on a calculation, I cant remember the exact but, its like amp x volts = power. Feel free to correct. In it he was speaking with Intel. He was claiming that a 13600kf should only need 175 or 200 amps. It may have even been in one of Intel's specification sheets. After reading that I tried using 175 and then 200 Amps in my bios. ASUS. 175 and 200 would cause my CPU to throttle even at the rated 181 volts. Without going through all the different scenarios I tried I will say that based on temps and performance. The 250 amps and 160 volts short and long term resulted in a Cinebench score of 24250. With the CPU staying at around 70 Celsius.. I would randomly check the Cinebench scores after bios changes. Last month while checking the score dropped to 22200. Now is a 2000 drop acceptable for 11 months of use? I then tried to turn up amps and volts, overclock etc. This time the pc was crashing. I also tried turning up my ram speed. I was able to overclock 6400 to 6800 no problem. Now not even 6600. It is causing issues now, that it didn't before. Everything I just said is a long winded way of saying. THESE CPUS ARE DEGRADING. I am unable to set up my pc as I once did and recreate the same results.
There was no awareness about this. But now it’s hopefully well known. I couldn’t believe it messed up 3 different times for me and no one on the internet related with me until i tested different clockspeeds, ddr4 ram, and voltages. Im 5.2 and undervolt using Lite load modification. And im ok on 14700开was on 2 separate 13900ks before i did this
I've been watching this story with interest, I run a 13600kf but it's been undervolted since day 1, I do a lot of sim racing and get extremely consistent frame rates and timings, I've certainly never noticed frame drops or stuttering and I haven't had any crashes, it is a very stable system at either 5.5GHz all P cores (most used OC) 5.8GHz all P cores or even 6.0GHz on two P cores and 5.8GHz on the rest. I think Intel or mobo manufacturers were a little optimistic with the voltages.
Does undervolting the CPU mitigate this issue? I have a 147000K running the MSI stock overclock with XMP undervolted 0.070 negative offset. and DDR5 memory at 6000.
Am I at risk of getting this problem?
Undervolting without also decreasing the frequency a bit can also bring instability. Especially with worse binned chips. You should do some stability testing first and not just on the CPU, but the memory as well as they are interlinked.
of degradation? no, not really... but you may have instability due to lack of voltage. that will not harm the cpu in any way but you may eventually get errors or crashes
undervolting is only one portion of the pie -- if the chip is still pulling amps (watts), its still going to heat up.
You need to set the power limits.
just for reference, I too am running an undervolt offset, on an MSI z690, but DDR4 board. I set the offset (for me, -0.085), then set the clocks to auto, LLC3 (or 4)
set the intel 253w limit on both LONG and SHORT. the seconds don't matter. set the amp limit to 400A.
This is on a 360mm AIO Arctic Frozer II...
cinebench R23 putting out 2.3-2.4k single core, and 35-36k multicore. CPU-Z single core was 965 if I remember right, don't remember what Multi was.
I degraded my 6700 K by OC it to 5.3 ghz at close to 0 degrees and well after that I had to downclock it to 4.7 ghz vs the 4.8 it ran before but its been running the 4.7 for the better part of 7 years now.
I wonder with these chips degrading so fast if with the down clocking the AMD chips at the same speed will be crushing them in games?
I went back to my 12900k from a 13900k to not have to deal with all the issues anymore.
im not facing any issues with my intel i7 14700k maybe thats is due to me using intel limits in my asus z790 motherboard
How do I change my
I7 14700k to intel limits?
@@TheTornadicManiac what brand motherboard do you have ?
@@TheOne214 it is asus
@@TheTornadicManiac plz kindly give full name of the motherboard you are using
I have 13700k for about 2 year I have not have any issues with the CPU I've had my powerlimit set day one when I got it as for my ram its 64gb 3600mhz its been stable for me
Maybe Because Dddr4?
After using the 13700k this cpu needs to be undervolted mine ran at 289 w in stress testing now it is 210 W
I've had freezes lately but its related to the trash IME drivers from Intel. I've had freezes from 1 second to 20 seconds after logon. I've installed different IME drivers and it highly affects the stutters. Downclocking or adjusting voltage doesnt affect the stutters, but sometimes it does because its a bit random how the IME drivers loads at logon I think. Pch chip temp is also a problem, they often have to small heatsinks creating dropouts on usb etc. The undervolt the pch voltage to get away with a too small heatsink. When the pch chip dumps all the heat into the mb the ram signals is also affected. The heat affects the pcb traces increasing the resistance so your ram oc is no longer stable. Try to keep the Pch chip under 65C.
13700KF I got at beginning of year is already dying this is absurd
yeap I have 13900k and 14900k both are unstable no matter what I do even out of box settings are not working.
They are slow down yea?
display control logic in the middle e cores also in the middle inter connect pass for fabric so technically everything can talk to everything , quad channel memory boom even IGPU's will work good
The thing is what i am gonna do with the CPU if I get a new I9 13k it will get broken in 2 month so I cant do that. Get a Lower CPU? Well I payed for a high end CPU and still want one in my rig. And to buy a AMD CPU would mean also to change the Motherboard... What a Dilemma
my cpu is a fiew days old it crashes not the game its imediatelly shuts down my pc. Even if undervoltet (offset - 0.085) the only way its not happening anymore is max. 5.4 ghz. But i reduced to 5.1 ghz. since then no issues, but i haven't a long term record, so i may switch to 7800x3d - imagine i would be on a doctor work 🤔 Intel was known for reliability, guess not anymore
Because mobo makers aren’t locking down the specs out of a desire to get high bench scores. It’s not a CPU thing it’s an industry thing around overclocking hardware.
Nice Vid! Have you noticed the increase of voltage in the last apex BIOS version that you mentioned? Im one of those who don’t want to run XMP because the SPD writing don’t consider voltages for the CPU side. So, even an external controller must have the right voltage. So, board parters set SA in auto and even worse, CPUVDDQ2 at very high levels like 1.35, which is wrong. You don’t want what a 8200/8400 run XMP at 1.4v VDD/VDDQ. There’s no understanding or knowledge in the community about DDR5 and how it trains and work.
Many Techtubers not only do not know, but they misinform the community, such as Buildzoid. I'm sorry he got into this topic. Instead of reading data sheets, he could have learned with Futurplus or also with some BIOSdev, but he does not manage relationships in his timings, he only works with (low) registers. It is not easy, but it is possible to reduce the voltages (lower) than an XMP profile, and not have stability problems. Finally, many users use fixed voltages with LLC6, limiting the core clocks, without allowing droop to exist, but for light loads they have excess current. The CPU must have its boost capacity, and depending on the quality of the silicon, limit the PLs, ICCMAX, IVR to avoid degradation.
Didn't an 11th gen set the overclock record
Very strange behavior of the processor, interesting that most of them work without problems for 2-3 months, then the problems start, that is, something happens, it changes within this period of 3 months.
currenly its power contollers and memory controllers sync to power
Auto power limit config on ASUS motherboard BIOS jump to 4095W (intel spec is 253W max) is insane. Its 4kW !
It's not just ASUS - Gigabyte has been doing this (basically disabling power limits) on their Z- and H-series boards for at least 12 years now.
@@totalermist I got a gigabyte motherboard I can confirm they just have it as auto so likely power is unlimited.