Historians Discuss ‘The 1619 Project,’ Centering Slavery as Foundation of US
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 июн 2021
- Nevada is the latest state taking on critical race theory. Parents are now clashing over curriculum proposals. In Reno, people packed a school board meeting as trustees considered expanding the K-5 curriculum to include more teaching about equity, diversity and racism. Opponents say the proposal would lead to the teaching of critical race theory. A conservative group even suggested teachers wear body cameras to ensure they aren't teaching lessons, including topics like "The 1619 Project." Dr. Peter Wood, president of the National Association of Scholars, and Dr. Greg Carr, the chair of the Department of Afro-American studies at Howard University, join Marc Lamont Hill on "Black News Tonight" to discuss if slavery is foundational to the United States.
To watch BNC programming, visit bnc.tv/how-to-watch/
Follow BNC on social media:
Facebook: / bncnews
Twitter: / bncnews
Instagram: bncnews?hl=en
#CriticalRaceTheory #1619Project #AmericanSlavery
Prof. Wood didnt even know how to respond to Dr Carr dropping all them gems
Great show Dr. Hill. I always enjoy Dr. Carr-(TSU). You cannot in any way minimize African contribution to America we did the the work. Dr. Carr your point “They are not interested learning they are interesting winning elections ” sums it up best . Most of states creating these laws rank low in education. Hopefully the bright inquisitive students with a quest for knowledge discover the truths ,unfortunately many of the other will probably become politicians. That was a win Dr. Carr
Marc Lamont Hill's journalism is some of the best news presentation I've seen in years. They gonna cancel him because he's good, Black, proud, and unapologetic. Let's see how this unfolds
Enjoyed the discussion! "Content matters!"
At This Point (As An Educator), It Is Next To Impossible For Me To Take Dr. Wood Seriously; Simply Because, At Every Turn, He Quite Literally Fails To Adequately Answer Any of The Questions That Marc Hill Asked Him. Especially, With Regards To Any Alternative Dates. smh
Dr. Carr as usual drops gems.
Give us reparations so we can leave
N go where
@@marohan were we don't get murdered for being black other countries aren't as fucked as the USA
@@chaosdjx13 what country is this???
@@marohan the fact that you don't know is sad 5 of them been advertising it for the last 4 years stop wasting my time if u and on code
@@marohan just let him leave bro, there are some nice icebergs in antartica that are waiting for black people to colonize. As soon as he doesn't have central air conditioning and 5g cell service, he'll be back.
I hope the Floyd family gave a large amount of that settlement to Ms. Frazier , Donald Williams & others that testified for GF.. but ESPECIALLY Ms Frazier ‼️ without her, they wouldn't have gotten a DIME
Worry about your own money.
What about the Spanish who arrived decades earlier? Louisiana purchase? California, Colo, Arizona, NM, n Utah. I feel like y'all missed a lot..
Can't take nothing serious Marc face brighter Lamont is on.
????
And even if whites don’t wanna know the truth doesn’t merely suggest the truth will ever go away- in other words , attempts to deny the truth will go unheard
Eye Opening interview, thank you! Mic'21 ADOS South
1619 seems like a rather odd number.
GREAT TAKE .!!!!!! SHE WITNESS PAIN!!! KEEP DOING THE GREAT WORK
I think the focus of is not on the shooting of the video and the aftermath but moreso on what it would mean if she wasn't there to shoot it. If that video didn't exist it would have been just another day.
Love to hear a serious debate on this topic. Great segment!
You did not just do that...
dun, dun, dun...
🤣
As soon as he said.."Europeans created the technology..." It was clear...
Here we go again...
Isn't that the purpose of a discussion or a debate? To counter the premise.
So if the 1619 project premise is that African American slaves are solely the basis of the formation of America then the opposition would be that white people contributed also.
It's intellectual reductionism, even cowardice, to then attack the person bringing whites into the conversation as "here we go again"
Nobody has "lived history over two and half centuries". The entire logic model of post-modernists is poetic, mythological and detached from reality.
Great discussion!
As Texas is a former territory of Mexico, doesn't anyone else think it might be possible that "negro creek" was not a racial name but just an alteration of a previous name for it in Spanish??
That could be true but do you think people are thinking that when they say it? 🤣😂🤣
@@user-jv8kr4im1t yes, Texas has tons of Mexicanos in it.
Dr Carr just ran circles around this man and gave more facts, dates, historical context, and analysis
the country is referred to as a white settlement because whites controlled the legal and cultural structure of the country
no other race had any input in those two crucial areas
@@robinsss
Incorrect, culturally and within government all groups had a hand in the structure. Native Americans provided a practice framework for democracy that helped our own, non existed in Europe and black Americans helped ensure many of the rights we all enjoy today. The colonial government is not what we use today. As far as the constitution that document was actually informed by a wealth of sources including the quran and letters to native people.
Before Columbus came Spain was highly populated by African Muslims and had Muslim rule. To suggest that this culture had no part in early America when it was a feature before 1619 is a eurocentric and limited scope imo.
@@user-jv8kr4im1t most African muslims were from north Africa and were white
and the Spanish were not colonists
@@robinsss
The Spanish did colonize and most of The moors were black hence the name. The white people were Europeans .....
@@user-jv8kr4im1t which part of America did the Spanish colonize ?
Peters opening argument is a waste of time, once he admits says slavery was a key institution in the creation of America, then what is his argument. Oh this 1619 project places too much emphasis on slavery as foundational to the creation of America even though I Peter think slavery as an institution was pivotal in the formation of America.
events more important than slavery in the founding of the country
the revolutionary war
the articles of confederation
the signing of the constitution
“Professor” wood is the President of the national association of scholars? How?
I was like hmmmmm he must of been the o KU one that applied 😂
Only one
Reach out to Gerald Horne .He wrote the book that gives explains the true motives of the founding of this country
The Counter Revolution of 1776? I just started reading it. Looks good so far. I bought it after watching this interview: ruclips.net/video/xPyG8i2YxtQ/видео.html
@@realblackmedia3528 what's the thesis?
@@robinsss In a nutshell, a contributing factor to the Revolutionary War was the enslavers' fear that Britain would soon abolish slavery in its colonies.
@@realblackmedia3528 even if that is true slavery was not more important to the founding of the country than the articles of confederation and 1619 is not the year of the creation of the country
@@robinsss obee kaybee
the 1619 project is being taught in all black homes, churches, pre-school, it's taught with civil rights
Slavery has a major part in the ideology of the people we called the founding father to dismiss the idea that slavery was just a piece is like comparing darkness to daylight, white hate, and overtly white racism was embedded in the fabric of this country to say that the European model shaped the mindset and ultimately how slave and slavery would be the blueprint of American society. When humans were no more than animals says this was the mindset of the enslavers and the rest of Americans. Talk about the lasting effects on slaves even today. My grandparents were slaves so to give me a perspective grounded in opinions rather than how people who suffered this hardship are disingenuous at best and an outright lie at worst.
Spit that shit daddy @DrCarr
*****Reparations****** NOW !!!!
Errrr! Ships were created thousands of years before Europeans got to American and were not 'invented' by Europeans by any stretch of historic accuracy. The boat was the main source of transportation, as far as Europeans are concerned, from the days of the Greek/Roman Empires, supposedly, until the early 20th century. Yet a ship in the class of the Mayflower, Nina, Pinta, Santa Maria, has not ever been produced dating back to this time period. Trojan Wars, Roman Conquest, Age of Exploration - Spanish Armada - Trans Atlantic Slave Trade(15 million individuals transported 260ish at time, on a 2mo voyage 1-way) - British Navy(Pre 1776). Not ONE boat of any of these era, anywhere. Not moored in historic harbors, or museums, or on History Ch. documentaries, @ the Smithsonian, or on display @ historic wreckage sites on beaches WORLDWIDE, not even on an episode of Jacque Cousteau who was underwater his whole damn life, did one make an appearance. Don't let the smooth taste fool ya. That's the sharp twang of Bullcrap Lager, brewed from distilled waters at the base the Caucus Mountains, maybe.
Chauvin is the first man to be found guilty of purposefully killing someone by accident, who was on a lethal dose of hard drugs.
Youre right, this circumstance is terrible. A suicide shouldnt have been blown out of proportion.
This seems like a very dumb statement. You should find something else to defend.
WOW!!!! Idiot statement
@@chrisleon5918 what else would you call a drug addict with 3x the lethal dose of fentanyl in his system dying of hypoxia, which is a common COD from fentanyl use?
@@thesmallestminorityisthein4045 I would call him someone who was doing Ng fine until he had a knee on his neck for over minutes. Like fine, he was seriously fine, and the doctor in the trial said that the way he died was completely inconsistent with and overdose. People develop tolerances, so a "lethal dose" varies from individual based on size and tolerance. Sir, you are acting ridiculous. That man was clearly murdered on film. He was murdered by a guy who knelt on his neck and didn't get up. How can you seriously sit around and try to defend what happened. He was cuffed and outnumbered. You should be ashamed of yourself.
@@chrisleon5918 .....chauvin had his knee on floyds shoulder blade, not neck. Being out numbered, however asinine a standard that is, does not affect someones ability to withstand narcotics especially in conjunction with vascular problems.
Reparations
Hopefully the award for her will help EVERYONE realize it is their right film all public servants on the job doing wrong, or doing good. Because there also a lot of that goes uncredited. But mainly to not be scared to do what is right, so PUNK ASS COPS like that scumbag are held accountable. Sorry for my language, that video of an empowered bag of garbage killing a man boils my blood! Hope he rots.
.
Really...what is there to debate regarding slavery and ALL of it's implications and impact it's had upon the enslaved and their descendants??? It's started before 1776, Whites benefited from it for the past 400 years and still benefit from enslaving our people worldwide. They've had 400 years to REPENT and REFUSE TO DO IT. SO, WHATEVER GOD HAS IN STORE FOR THEM LET THEM PUT THAT "H" ON THEIR CHEST AND HANDLE IT -- I know one thing...IT AIN"T GONNA BE NICE. Genesis 15: 12-14 DEAL WITH IT.
Hmmmmm so the ships that could bring PEOPLE (white) just so happen to be the ships that brought SLAVES!!! He doesn’t view slaves as people bc if so he would not have separated the two. That sentence gives insight to his though process.
I disagree. He didn't elaborate everything completely but I don't think that is what he believes. He was just describing what happened at the time. The people that made the ships didn't have slavery in mind, they had willing passengers in mind and then it was used for slavery. His point was to differentiate the two groups, not dehumanizing one of them.
@@susanzeidler3960 ok that’s your interpretation. From the mouth the heart flows and he said what he said. What you are doing is assuming because how can you be sure what his point really was? What I did was state exactly what he said without adding or subtracting. Words are powerful and again he said what he said. It’s doesn’t matter what white ppl called the Africans they enslaved, they were still PEOPLE. Slave is the word that’s used to dehumanize them and that’s exactly what he did in his statement. He could have said enslaved humans. We have to be intentional about using enslaved humans and correcting others when they say slave!!!
Talk to Thomas Sowell about the 1619 project and get his take on it!he is way smarter than both of these Gentlemen!
He doesn't fit the victimhood narrative so he will not get no air. Lamont knows better.
They would never do that. They do not respect sowell,he is conservative and they hate conservatives
Y'all love some Thomas Sowell. He's an economist, not an historian.
Thomas Sowell is a mediocre economist who has little in the way of published peer review scholarship.
@@nickj5476 blasphemy. Most if not all of his economic takes have been proven over time.
What happens to indigenous people in this discussion? They are the first victims of settler colonialism across the Americas. Africans are not the first victims or foundational
Facts but it was NOT the subject of topic discussion.
Actually we are foundational. Context matters. We are DESCENDANTS of those FOUNDATIONAL stolen people brought to the americas, and specifically, and contextually speaking, today's modern day, U.S.
@@Kemetyu-Centered36 in fairness, it was not every tribe that participated. Further, those that did, they are just like the Descendants of the white folk that did ply the trade of slavers and Plantation/$lave Owners. They see it as a inconvenient and uncomfortable truth. A nuisance that won't go away.
@@renewilson2540 These two things go hand in hand . Dr. Carr’s example of the Magna Carta shows how the narrative must be created with context. The genocide of indigenous people and the enslavement of Africans are both a product of European colonialism.
'Indigenous people' arent dark enough to be special. That's all it is.
Slavs or slav.es came from Ndongo Ngola and the Kongo???????????????? Slavs are khazar people.
Really add 400 yrs. To 1619, were r not from africa liars.
Both the host and Carr take a very self centered narcisstic view of history....America is not just about the experience of black people...