@High Roller Quinn lmao tell me about it And the title of those kinds of video is so over the top and the way they photoshop those aircraft are ridiculous and it barely even goes mentioned nor is related to the list
It's funny to me how this universe apparently thinks that not only does the President not warrant an aircraft like this for use as Air Force One while a small team of agents DOES, but it's also decked out with luxury features a private jet would have for this small team of agents. Lmao
Well yeah but one, S.H.I.E.L.D is a worldwide organization not linked to any country and two, this plane was ludicrously expensive because cousins team was supposed to act like a low-key version of the avengers and therefore required a fast mobile base that they could stay on for long periods of time in order to complete their work.
I think its similar to the emperor palpatine logic: why does the most powerful sith lord in the galaxy (at the time) need a bunch of guards to protect him? It's to give everybody the illusion that the emperor isn't that powerful...the POTUS is symbolic of the US's power, it is not THE power itself, thus the POTUS doesn't need an aerial tank, he just needs something to make sure he doesn't get blown outta the sky over Iran
I actually built a recreation of this in Kerbal Space Program once, and to my surprise it actually worked as a VTOL capable vehicle. Since my only source is KSP, you may wanna take this with a grain of salt, but I think a VTOL C-17 might actually be possible in real life. Who knows?
It's totally possible, we have engines capable of that kind of thrust to weight ratio. The hard part would be designing an engine that can rotate like that without breaking off. And if it's too complex the maintenance on it might not be worth it, plus the extra fuel it would burn to lift the plane in vtol mode since the wings won't be providing lift while in vtol.
@@Yukimaru0 I mean, vtol is barely viable in modern fighters to the point ir's been almost entirely relegated to short take off use, if we assume a vtol C-17 to be used for cargo then I don't think that it would be able to take off with any significant load. It might be useful to deliver cargo or personal somewhere that doesn't have an airstrip, as long as it takes off in normal configuration I guess it could then land vertically and then take off once unloaded, but at that point you'd be better off sending two ospreys or a cargo helicopter. Maybe it could be used as a mobile base, maybe as a replacement for the current airforce one? I mean, I guess that being able to land a C17 anywhere would be invaluable during an emergency, while during regular operation it'd need less maintenance and wouldn't use it's vtol features besides maybe sometimes as a showpiece in military parades or something. In short it wouldn't be practical, but I dont think it'd be impossible or useless. In the end Ospreys have a good 90% of those drawbacks but are still very much in service and appreciated by the military so who knows, maybe someday
@@npc6817 You'd basically have to ask yourself if the amount of cargo your abel to land would allow you to get set up faster by enough to have a viable use case. And then you'll want to figure out if the cost to develop and operate would be worth the gains from being able to land or fly out the larger payloads. In the MCU we can only assume that they have tech available that brings the cost to build and operate down low enough to make the plane viable.
@@Yukimaru0 yeah after all if it was such a great idea it would've probably been done or at least considered, hell most likely it was already proposed and shot down for a reason or another. Still, I might make it my next rc project, a real life bus could be unfeasible but I'm pretty sure 6 medium powered edf's should easily lift some Styrofoam and balsa wood. Hell I'd finally have an excuse to try making an edf afterburner again.
Seen @1:00 and @1:07, I made the BUS desk model for the show, first season. It had a lighted base with SHEILD logo, and red, green navigation lights. I also made the little Lola toys, too.
The cage being further back makes sense. The increased weight of the craft might've required more lift. Rather than rebuilding the original wings by adding 2 smaller wings they could add more lift but this would push the centre of lift back too. Therefore the centre of mass would've been moved towards the back of the plane to help with stability. Hence why the cage would be further back and why they needed the full size VTOL engines. Also the TWR for vtol might've necessitated the larger engines.
that's what I was thinking too when I saw the larger rear wings. And the rear engines could be operating in a reduced capacity during normal flight, as they wouldn't be needed as much, to mitigate some of the problems it would have by ingesting some of the forward engines exhaust. In any sort of vtol/stol mode, it would have no problems with ingesting exhaust and with the cage being pushed towards the rear, the full sized engines help with stability like you said.
@@IIlIIlIIlII A) leave nerds alone to nerd out B) When you work with this stuff a lot it may seem complicated and a lot of effort but that was just of the top of my head C) The video that you're in the comment section of goes into the exact same level of detail and talks about the same ideas
@@sergarlantyrell7847 do you know how heavy a room designed to hold literal gods in would weigh? I don't. Do you think they just toss a tank in the back like it's a moving truck or perhaps they might be a bit picky on where they park their 63 tonne tank
That would be nice, to solidify the show's place in the MCU. Or even just Coulson, and the reactions of the surviving original avengers to his being alive, or as alive as being an LMD is. Would have been neat to have the Coulson Chronicom LMD disguised at Stark's funeral.
….am the only one who has this weird feeling, out of everything in the MARVEL universe, THIS actually looks real and doable? Great job on the breakdown.
Glad other people see the engine placement issue. A couple of other fun issues is that big turbofans don't throttle up and down fast enough to be able to control a craft in vertical flight (hence jets like the F-35 have extra control systems for pitch and roll). Another fun one (which is present in most airplanes in movies) is the HUGE size discrepancy of the inside and outside of the plane.
In regard to your second point yes jet engines are slow to change throttle. This problem is largely fixed by running the after burner to provide thrust that can change quickly and the outer edge of the exhaust opens to quickly reduce thrust.
Not as much of a discrepancy - the actual interiors would fit... the issues though in the show is actually a result of CGI, like when its parked in the hanger in season 2, the wings would be well into the damn walls lol. Or like at the start of the second episode of season 1 when Skye is just coming aboard as an actual member of the team, and the establishing shot reveals only a thin slit in the wall piece that sits above the doors of the hanger,... and the plane clearly is too big to fit (with the vertical stabiliser) without such a slit, except... at the top of the vertical stabiliser is the horizontal stabilisers.
The total internal compartments (based on their size and scale from the videos) seem a bit too much for an aircraft this size. And if you regularly dock other objects on the top of the fuselage, you would want to have split tails instead of a central V stab.
for the upper deck docking system, the single vertical fin design would creature stabilities problem when smaller jet are dock on top of it when flight, this is why the an225 Antonov split the central vertical fin into 2 vertical fin on each end of the tail.
That problem is reduced when you look at the jet head-on. There is plenty of clearance to avoid exhaust or vortices since airflow will not de-laminate from the fuselage.
@@DrewHaughton well, actually, no. The wings on a C-17 are designed to create turbulent flow to reduce stalling, and the rear engines are certainly within the wake of the forward inboard engines' exhaust cones, meaning they will be sucking in hot air, which would cause premature heating, flame outs, and overall a host of other engine problems
i think like most near-futuristic military vehicles in many movies, all of this is possible in real life, its only the matter of whether or not we actually needed one
like most near futuristic military vehicles in any marvel movie, it is not only impossible but a total waste of resources to even attempt such a braindead project. a VTOL c17 is pretty pointless, a 'flying base' is even more pointless. not to mention the whole thing could be taken out with one missile. its the dumbest idea you could come up with for a base.
I would be willing to bet that the engines are also equipped with Tony's Repulsor technology. That's probably the afterburner you're mentioning, good video though
fun fact, most airliners are only one bolt failure away from having there engine vertical... and then typically break of. This have happened a number of times Factoid 2... the engine of a C5 galaxy have a maximum thrust of 23 ton each, about 92 tons in total. The operational empty weight is 172 tons. So even with adding two more engines, it would still not be able to lift vertical, even with totally empty. Well i guess, swiching out those for GE90 would solve that issue. Having a total lift power of 230 tons with 4 engines and up to 345 tons with 6 engines, would actually be quite close to the MTOW of the aircraft. Granted, the engines would ad 4 tons each for the 4 normal once and an additional 8 ton each for the two extra, total extra weight of 32 tons, increasing the empty weight from just about 170 tons to just over 200 tons. The exhaust of a turbofan engine is actually not that hot, specially not in cruise. The air is mostly mixed out. So could you make a Vtol aircraft this way... well pretty much yes. The main issue with making a VTOL turbofan engine is the spool up and down time. This can be compensated with having the engine thrust in a non optimal direction Fotnote. I thought it looked like a C5, but on closer inspection, its a C17, a slightly smaller aircraft. All numbers a bit smaller, so.. well it would be easier to find a engine that would fit.
Most things in this thing can be booked under "it works because sci-fi" and thats fine. but what really bothers me is the fact that those engines produce mach diamonds and people arent deaf after it landed nearby
This thing reminds me of the wild thornberries RV. Looks normal sized from outside but then you go inside and somehow there’s a small compound inside 😂
And Sky is a mutant....how does your pseudo nerdy pedantic genius explain how this is feasible 🙄 You must have been a right old bore during all the MCU movies!
This show was cool until sky’s mother killed that guy with the awesome mustache. That was such a fucking painfully stupid decision. I was excited to actually see some sort of progress being made in terms of an alliance between the “mutants” and SHIELD. They took that meeting in the absolutely worst direction they possibly could have.
The plane could've altered from an international cargo plane with a focus on durability. The defense could be handled with some drones. They could travel by accessing the airport computers.
If this plane was modified by Stark Industries (which basically means Tony) it would surely use repulsores as its engines instead of normal turbojets. Which would mitigate the sucking hot exhaust problem. The blue Tinted colour of the afterburner flames do indicate that. How could you miss that?
The other clue is the insane range and vtol capabilities. Has the show ever shown them refueling at all? Once they were a small terrorist organization how could they possibly have fleets of tankers you would need with her fuel based engines.
It's a very ideal way to convert a cruise air-ship/plane into VTOL. Only in real life, a practical full engine rotation, versus vector valves (f-35 style), will require a rugged wing limb to bare the actuator & mechanism bulk size. The rear engines needed be tail high.
Actually all the VToL ability was feasable, the danger was the fact, it was a chem-fuel combustion, too risky for a rock-drop crash during vtol sequal. Had it been more like a real "Air Bus" carrier engine, the option of holding lesser fluids, and more mini nuclear amp electric, the fuel during cruise mode, could have made it even more reality. If the main wings had considerable elongated form near the shoulder, all the engines could be on each width row, *front bottom & rear over top* for vtol-to-cruise rapid effects. Only small cd-tray style ductfans adjacent, at the very front and back of the craft body.
For a second I believed in that descent. Then I realized that is not possible. Then I started thinking. Why this have not done before? Are there testing of VTOL airplanes? Is it possible? What structural changes must be made on the hull structure? How many curved profile beams requires? This is an interesting problem for aviation. It must be solved. :3
the problem just comes down to weight and thrust. The Pratt & Whitney F117-PW-100 that c17s currently use have ~40,000 lbs of thrust. an empty c17 weighs almost 300,000 lbs. while a vtol c17 with no cargo would be possible, it would be very impractical. Once you add more engines, you need more fuel, etc etc etc. The closest real-life counterpart to any of these fantasy vtol's would probably be the mv-22 osprey.
@@cool5tuff well no, i think the Do-31, which had eight lift engines just to get airborne in addition to the two thrust vectored pegasus engines is probably the most similar. Very interesting, but not very practical.
Cool how it was able to travel through time and stay cloaked at a high enough altitude without aircraft from whatever time period detecting an anomaly like pilots noticing a visible distortion in the air
Imagine our tax is used to build that damn thing.. but then they destroy it and built a new one. That bus alone might be cost more than 2x or 3x airbus MRTT… Our tax is not well spent, in the other hand IRS is sucking hard our tax 😂 to build a flying bus
In my opinion as human couldn’t breath it means that theres no oxygen in the planet, so i guess the air inlet could be replaced by oxygen tank probably :/.
Looks like one of those "Top 10 largest planes" thumbnails
It's not really all that big. Zephyr One is kinda huge though!
@@hoojiwana yeah in the 3rd season I think they mention it being the largest plane ever built in some filler dialogue.
@High Roller Quinn lmao tell me about it
And the title of those kinds of video is so over the top and the way they photoshop those aircraft are ridiculous and it barely even goes mentioned nor is related to the list
@@hoojiwana *Antonov AN-225 laughing in the corner*
Lmao i saw zephyr one in a thumbnail
As much as I loved the Zephyr, the Bus always has a special place in my heart - it had a bar!
A really nice one
But not a fish tank
Zephyr is cool, but when they were using the Bus, Ward was still my favorite character.
@@Jimmy_Jones you devenced me 😂🤗
An analysis should be done on tje zeyphr
It's funny to me how this universe apparently thinks that not only does the President not warrant an aircraft like this for use as Air Force One while a small team of agents DOES, but it's also decked out with luxury features a private jet would have for this small team of agents. Lmao
Well yeah but one, S.H.I.E.L.D is a worldwide organization not linked to any country and two, this plane was ludicrously expensive because cousins team was supposed to act like a low-key version of the avengers and therefore required a fast mobile base that they could stay on for long periods of time in order to complete their work.
You might die, but the job sure does have perks.
@@tahunuva4254 true dat
I think its similar to the emperor palpatine logic: why does the most powerful sith lord in the galaxy (at the time) need a bunch of guards to protect him? It's to give everybody the illusion that the emperor isn't that powerful...the POTUS is symbolic of the US's power, it is not THE power itself, thus the POTUS doesn't need an aerial tank, he just needs something to make sure he doesn't get blown outta the sky over Iran
If the President were onboard, it becomes Air Force 1.
It doesn't have ALL the luxuries. Director Fury nixed the fishtank.
I actually built a recreation of this in Kerbal Space Program once, and to my surprise it actually worked as a VTOL capable vehicle. Since my only source is KSP, you may wanna take this with a grain of salt, but I think a VTOL C-17 might actually be possible in real life. Who knows?
It's totally possible, we have engines capable of that kind of thrust to weight ratio. The hard part would be designing an engine that can rotate like that without breaking off. And if it's too complex the maintenance on it might not be worth it, plus the extra fuel it would burn to lift the plane in vtol mode since the wings won't be providing lift while in vtol.
@@Yukimaru0 I mean, vtol is barely viable in modern fighters to the point ir's been almost entirely relegated to short take off use, if we assume a vtol C-17 to be used for cargo then I don't think that it would be able to take off with any significant load.
It might be useful to deliver cargo or personal somewhere that doesn't have an airstrip, as long as it takes off in normal configuration I guess it could then land vertically and then take off once unloaded, but at that point you'd be better off sending two ospreys or a cargo helicopter.
Maybe it could be used as a mobile base, maybe as a replacement for the current airforce one? I mean, I guess that being able to land a C17 anywhere would be invaluable during an emergency, while during regular operation it'd need less maintenance and wouldn't use it's vtol features besides maybe sometimes as a showpiece in military parades or something.
In short it wouldn't be practical, but I dont think it'd be impossible or useless.
In the end Ospreys have a good 90% of those drawbacks but are still very much in service and appreciated by the military so who knows, maybe someday
@@npc6817 You'd basically have to ask yourself if the amount of cargo your abel to land would allow you to get set up faster by enough to have a viable use case. And then you'll want to figure out if the cost to develop and operate would be worth the gains from being able to land or fly out the larger payloads. In the MCU we can only assume that they have tech available that brings the cost to build and operate down low enough to make the plane viable.
@@Yukimaru0 yeah after all if it was such a great idea it would've probably been done or at least considered, hell most likely it was already proposed and shot down for a reason or another.
Still, I might make it my next rc project, a real life bus could be unfeasible but I'm pretty sure 6 medium powered edf's should easily lift some Styrofoam and balsa wood.
Hell I'd finally have an excuse to try making an edf afterburner again.
@@npc6817 If you post this on RUclips (if you do it) I will literally love it
"I get to operate and fly a modified C17 VTOL... What do you do?"
"Every now and then I get to fly the helicarriers"
Your nickname says i can fly :D
10 out of 10 hope this channel makes it big. Love Sci-fi engineering analysis.
Thankyou!
Can you do a Zephyr one follow up? This video was truly great!
Your profile pic. .
Its giving me bad vibes...
Also some flash backs when my pc wouldnt work at all...
I think you've put more thought into the feasibility of this airplane than the show's writers ever did. Nice work!
Seen @1:00 and @1:07, I made the BUS desk model for the show, first season. It had a lighted base with SHEILD logo, and red, green navigation lights. I also made the little Lola toys, too.
That's sick! Is there a chance that you might have some pictures to share? If you're allowed obviously
Damn thats AWESOME!
That’s really cool :D
I still miss the bus... I miss the whole team actually. They somehow felt like you knew them. Good memories...
You forgot to mention The Bus' call sign as Flight 616 which is the main comics reality of Marvel
The cage being further back makes sense. The increased weight of the craft might've required more lift. Rather than rebuilding the original wings by adding 2 smaller wings they could add more lift but this would push the centre of lift back too. Therefore the centre of mass would've been moved towards the back of the plane to help with stability. Hence why the cage would be further back and why they needed the full size VTOL engines.
Also the TWR for vtol might've necessitated the larger engines.
that's what I was thinking too when I saw the larger rear wings. And the rear engines could be operating in a reduced capacity during normal flight, as they wouldn't be needed as much, to mitigate some of the problems it would have by ingesting some of the forward engines exhaust. In any sort of vtol/stol mode, it would have no problems with ingesting exhaust and with the cage being pushed towards the rear, the full sized engines help with stability like you said.
Are you really bringing physics and calculations into another boring bullshit sci-fi movie? It's sci-fi. Weight and lift aren't a thing in those.
@@IIlIIlIIlII A) leave nerds alone to nerd out B) When you work with this stuff a lot it may seem complicated and a lot of effort but that was just of the top of my head C) The video that you're in the comment section of goes into the exact same level of detail and talks about the same ideas
You mean the cage that's built inside of the cargo deck of a plane designed to carry a tank?
@@sergarlantyrell7847 do you know how heavy a room designed to hold literal gods in would weigh? I don't.
Do you think they just toss a tank in the back like it's a moving truck or perhaps they might be a bit picky on where they park their 63 tonne tank
So cool, I liked AoS I wish at least daizy or fitz will appear in a movie
That would be nice, to solidify the show's place in the MCU. Or even just Coulson, and the reactions of the surviving original avengers to his being alive, or as alive as being an LMD is. Would have been neat to have the Coulson Chronicom LMD disguised at Stark's funeral.
its rummor jemma its in secret invasion series ...and daisy left out powerpuff girls project in same time
I would have liked to see an apearence from Deke on Loki as a TVA prisioner, a Variant.
@@evandrolima1724 Yeah. That would be funny for season 2!
Please make it happen Marvel Studios! 😂
….am the only one who has this weird feeling, out of everything in the MARVEL universe, THIS actually looks real and doable? Great job on the breakdown.
Glad other people see the engine placement issue.
A couple of other fun issues is that big turbofans don't throttle up and down fast enough to be able to control a craft in vertical flight (hence jets like the F-35 have extra control systems for pitch and roll).
Another fun one (which is present in most airplanes in movies) is the HUGE size discrepancy of the inside and outside of the plane.
In regard to your second point yes jet engines are slow to change throttle. This problem is largely fixed by running the after burner to provide thrust that can change quickly and the outer edge of the exhaust opens to quickly reduce thrust.
Not as much of a discrepancy - the actual interiors would fit... the issues though in the show is actually a result of CGI, like when its parked in the hanger in season 2, the wings would be well into the damn walls lol. Or like at the start of the second episode of season 1 when Skye is just coming aboard as an actual member of the team, and the establishing shot reveals only a thin slit in the wall piece that sits above the doors of the hanger,... and the plane clearly is too big to fit (with the vertical stabiliser) without such a slit, except... at the top of the vertical stabiliser is the horizontal stabilisers.
I'm so glad you did this!! I love AOS and am glad it's getting analyzed. The Bus was such a big part of the show in its earlier seasons
The total internal compartments (based on their size and scale from the videos) seem a bit too much for an aircraft this size. And if you regularly dock other objects on the top of the fuselage, you would want to have split tails instead of a central V stab.
for the upper deck docking system, the single vertical fin design would creature stabilities problem when smaller jet are dock on top of it when flight, this is why the an225 Antonov split the central vertical fin into 2 vertical fin on each end of the tail.
Someone else noticed the engine configuration problem. I'm not alone!
That problem is reduced when you look at the jet head-on. There is plenty of clearance to avoid exhaust or vortices since airflow will not de-laminate from the fuselage.
@@DrewHaughton well, actually, no. The wings on a C-17 are designed to create turbulent flow to reduce stalling, and the rear engines are certainly within the wake of the forward inboard engines' exhaust cones, meaning they will be sucking in hot air, which would cause premature heating, flame outs, and overall a host of other engine problems
i think like most near-futuristic military vehicles in many movies, all of this is possible in real life, its only the matter of whether or not we actually needed one
like most near futuristic military vehicles in any marvel movie, it is not only impossible but a total waste of resources to even attempt such a braindead project. a VTOL c17 is pretty pointless, a 'flying base' is even more pointless. not to mention the whole thing could be taken out with one missile. its the dumbest idea you could come up with for a base.
Came to the channel from Spacedock. I loved seeing you gave The Bus a video.
Dunno why, but this seems like a surprisingly plausible design for a VTOL special-purpose cargo aircraft.
5:02 looks like they can succ sufficient air there, though the sides might get burned from the after burners of engines 2 & 3 lol
I’ve only watched Season one... think I’m going to watch the rest now💪
I miss this show so much
i bought it on youtube, i watch it all the time xD
I would be willing to bet that the engines are also equipped with Tony's Repulsor technology. That's probably the afterburner you're mentioning, good video though
Please do an analysis on Zephyr One too! I love the Bus from Agents of SHIELD!
Great video,
You should do the zephyr one ‘
Great video big fan of agents of shield.
fun fact, most airliners are only one bolt failure away from having there engine vertical... and then typically break of. This have happened a number of times
Factoid 2... the engine of a C5 galaxy have a maximum thrust of 23 ton each, about 92 tons in total. The operational empty weight is 172 tons. So even with adding two more engines, it would still not be able to lift vertical, even with totally empty. Well i guess, swiching out those for GE90 would solve that issue. Having a total lift power of 230 tons with 4 engines and up to 345 tons with 6 engines, would actually be quite close to the MTOW of the aircraft.
Granted, the engines would ad 4 tons each for the 4 normal once and an additional 8 ton each for the two extra, total extra weight of 32 tons, increasing the empty weight from just about 170 tons to just over 200 tons.
The exhaust of a turbofan engine is actually not that hot, specially not in cruise. The air is mostly mixed out.
So could you make a Vtol aircraft this way... well pretty much yes. The main issue with making a VTOL turbofan engine is the spool up and down time. This can be compensated with having the engine thrust in a non optimal direction
Fotnote. I thought it looked like a C5, but on closer inspection, its a C17, a slightly smaller aircraft. All numbers a bit smaller, so.. well it would be easier to find a engine that would fit.
It’s successor looks like an ace combat boss.
It would be awesome to have Analysis video of the Zephyr
04:16 "Here's something you can't do..." -Wash
"May, we need a crazy Ivan!"
"Damnit Phil I'm not Wash!"
"... so you DID WATCH IT!"
"...Shit."
@@AlMcpherson79 Debrief after Lorelei is taken off-world :
"...I knew you let her kiss you."
Too soon?
Never forget the mini bar!
awesome!!!!!!!!!! exactly what we need for fanfiction purposes lmao
Please do a video on the Zephyr, it's so cool and I love it
Rest in peace bus we all love you and we will always miss you
I wish somebody would do this for the Zepher I would love to know more about that plane
Been on the C-17s before, wish ours was this comfortable 😂
Most things in this thing can be booked under "it works because sci-fi" and thats fine. but what really bothers me is the fact that those engines produce mach diamonds and people arent deaf after it landed nearby
So... How much thrust do the engines generate and how much fuel do they spend during VTOL?
has never been explained as far as I'm aware, but if my math is correct, roughly a metric shit-ton or two
This is my Dream Toy!
Agents of shield was a surprisingly good show. I kinda miss it.
This thing reminds me of the wild thornberries RV. Looks normal sized from outside but then you go inside and somehow there’s a small compound inside 😂
Not feasible, load distribution is a clusterfuck not to mention it's super forward center of mass.
And Sky is a mutant....how does your pseudo nerdy pedantic genius explain how this is feasible 🙄 You must have been a right old bore during all the MCU movies!
@@malahammer Come on don't get at him. Most of us are interested in the real-world capabilities of science fiction technology.
Perfect for evacuating Tony Stark from Afghanistan
lmao
And that's why the RDA make the valkyrie shuttle. No offence, Stan Lee
Really nice plane !
This show was cool until sky’s mother killed that guy with the awesome mustache. That was such a fucking painfully stupid decision. I was excited to actually see some sort of progress being made in terms of an alliance between the “mutants” and SHIELD. They took that meeting in the absolutely worst direction they possibly could have.
Great video
I love the bus.
The Bus will Always be in our Hearts forever. Also, could you make a Video Analyzing the Zephyr One?
Really enjoyed this series
とてもすばらしいアップロードありがとう❤。
Very good info, Thank you...
The plane could've altered from an international cargo plane with a focus on durability. The defense could be handled with some drones. They could travel by accessing the airport computers.
I love the Bus (from Season 1-2) and the Zephyr (from Season 3-6)
ahhhhh I love agents of shield
By just looking at it , it would be a pain to pilot it . It would tip back , because of the heavy engines at back
If we can build these IRL it will be bonkers.
nothing that would look like it
If this plane was modified by Stark Industries (which basically means Tony) it would surely use repulsores as its engines instead of normal turbojets. Which would mitigate the sucking hot exhaust problem. The blue Tinted colour of the afterburner flames do indicate that. How could you miss that?
The other clue is the insane range and vtol capabilities. Has the show ever shown them refueling at all? Once they were a small terrorist organization how could they possibly have fleets of tankers you would need with her fuel based engines.
awesome video! liked and subscribed. hoping for more content like this.
Nice video new sub i miss agent’s of shield
It's a very ideal way to convert a cruise air-ship/plane into VTOL. Only in real life, a practical full engine rotation, versus vector valves (f-35 style), will require a rugged wing limb to bare the actuator & mechanism bulk size. The rear engines needed be tail high.
Nice aircraft
You should do the zephyr one
> Uses thermo-optical camouflage
> Runs around on afterburners with exposed exhaust
Actually all the VToL ability was feasable, the danger was the fact, it was a chem-fuel combustion, too risky for a rock-drop crash during vtol sequal. Had it been more like a real "Air Bus" carrier engine, the option of holding lesser fluids, and more mini nuclear amp electric, the fuel during cruise mode, could have made it even more reality.
If the main wings had considerable elongated form near the shoulder, all the engines could be on each width row, *front bottom & rear over top* for vtol-to-cruise rapid effects. Only small cd-tray style ductfans adjacent, at the very front and back of the craft body.
For a second I believed in that descent. Then I realized that is not possible.
Then I started thinking. Why this have not done before? Are there testing of VTOL airplanes? Is it possible? What structural changes must be made on the hull structure? How many curved profile beams requires? This is an interesting problem for aviation. It must be solved. :3
Google Do-31
the problem just comes down to weight and thrust. The Pratt & Whitney F117-PW-100 that c17s currently use have ~40,000 lbs of thrust. an empty c17 weighs almost 300,000 lbs. while a vtol c17 with no cargo would be possible, it would be very impractical. Once you add more engines, you need more fuel, etc etc etc. The closest real-life counterpart to any of these fantasy vtol's would probably be the mv-22 osprey.
@@cool5tuff well no, i think the Do-31, which had eight lift engines just to get airborne in addition to the two thrust vectored pegasus engines is probably the most similar. Very interesting, but not very practical.
This looks so cool
You forgot, one major part Nick fury gave them a second bus before this Zepffer
As a Maintainer, its a mechanical nightmare
Really cool vid
Fuel capacity : 200ton
range : 50km
The bus is bussin
Taleban need this now to fire their smoke!
they always have the coolest vehicles known to man
Something the Belkans would build.
Did you saw the aircraft shown in the last few seconds of the video?
Yeah, there is a similar aircraft in Ace Combat
@@ultralaggerREV1 Gleipnir.
Well now im waiting for a follow up video to the Zephyr One :D
is there a chance we get to see it?
This plane will be the next top secret project for us army..
Looking at this
Stark knew that Phil is alive and well
"Stealth" invicible!
Me : (start thinking about the mirror-made AirCraft)
Zephyr one looks cool and all but the Bus just has so much more charm
I prefer this transport than the later one, I would prefer it without the big tailfin/ rudder and enlarged twin tails instead.
Cool how it was able to travel through time and stay cloaked at a high enough altitude without aircraft from whatever time period detecting an anomaly like pilots noticing a visible distortion in the air
Actually it was the zephyr one, the successor to the bus that made time travel and that was improved with alien and future technology
2:06 Dude, if she had on a pair of glasses, she could totally look like Dr. Ariel Hansen from StarCraft II. >:D
I know a C17 is big but this is insane that all this is inside
Marvel = The bus
Real life = Airbus
Forget about the engines, it's clearly a TARDIS - it's bigger on the inside :P
These are already in use in...disguised as Boeing. They are used for tracking and following suspects....no joke.
The bus looks like what the 2190's airforce one should be capable of.
3:58 that looks so cool and id hate to be those guys
I was genuinely sad when they had to destroy the Bus. That thing ruled.
Imagine our tax is used to build that damn thing.. but then they destroy it and built a new one.
That bus alone might be cost more than 2x or 3x airbus MRTT…
Our tax is not well spent, in the other hand IRS is sucking hard our tax 😂 to build a flying bus
In my opinion as human couldn’t breath it means that theres no oxygen in the planet, so i guess the air inlet could be replaced by oxygen tank probably :/.
Commented on wrong video it supposed to be for the avatar 🤭
It was retrofitted by stark but it dous not use repulsors like the iron man suits
I dunno there isn't much analysis in this imo. Interesting plane though.
0:01 Arm Forces should do this in real life!
Waiting for Zephyr 1 analysis
It’s adorable
Needs some streamlining
And two more engines
And a better shape for the new aerodynamics
Especially weight
*Oh and ditch that paint*