If you been in the industry long enough, you would remember the games AMD played from 1995-2015. 5 years is not enough of a benchmark for me to trust them.
I found something interesting. If I used the Intel Default Profile and MCE off on my 12900K, I found my temperatures were incredibly high, sometimes hitting upwards of 95C+ in games. When I switched to the Asus Advanced OC profile and also disabled MCE, I found my temperatures were back to normal and hovering in the
I'm seeing the same with the 13700k which is curious. I wonder if Asus is now optimizing Intel defaults with their profile and the intel profile default isn't really the safer settings.
thats due to intel's high LLC and VID specifications. ASUS and motherboard vendors were undervolting the cpus out of the box via ACLL and DC_LL....which is actually a good thing.
I bought an i7-14700K on a B760 Gaming X AX in January. The PC ran completely without issues for almost 11 months, and I was satisfied. Last week, a BIOS update came through the Gigabyte software, and since then, I've only had problems, with the PC freezing constantly. I've tried everything: system restore, different BIOS versions, various driver combinations, and even a complete reinstall. It feels like the issue can’t be reversed now, even though it ran smoothly for 11 months. I haven't changed any components or settings.
that's really terrible, did you contact the seller? and rn I'm so confused on choosing cpu. on one hand amd is slower on windows on the other intel is dying!. but intel i9 14th is on sale, just slightly above than i7 14th gen. so do you think you can help with this? should I go with intel or amd? i need an PC asap but I'm sooo stuck.
@@jasson7106definetly go for a AMD. I should have as well. Depending on the money you wanna spent go for the Ryzen 7 7800x3D or the new one Ryzen 9 7950x3D.
I have a similar issue, my 14700KF seems to be causing complete system lock up. It was random at first but within a week it turned into what it seems to be a permanent issue. My computer will boot past bios but then will freeze either immediately after putting my PIN or sometimes it won’t even get that far.
There is nothing wrong with your computer. The problem is that the update/reinstall/default settings changed settings in your bios. See if you don't know, don't change stuff. There is no reason to update bios on a 11 month old computer. So because of this new settings, you now don't know which are changed and you should double check your bios settings, like everything. From cpu clock/volts to Memory ram clocks/volts to other advanced settings 4g decoding, rebar, turbo boost, c states, e cores. Some motherboard has certain 'modes' that might be changed as well like turbo power limits, game boost ect ect. I know 100% your watts/voltage are higher then it should that's why you get freezing, stuttering and poor performance. Because your setting are changed and if you restored it to default then you messed it up even more and you need to set everything manually again. Good luck 👍
I did the same test with my 13600k and ended up with around 1.4v and around 90'C in HWinfo. What fixed it was going into the 'SVID Behaviour' settings and selecting 'Best Case Scenario'. Now my Voltages are around 1.2 - 1.25 during Cinebench.
ive always done manual OC's on my PCs so i wouldnt be surprised that the motherboard manufactures or even intel are aware of the overvoltes of their "Auto" settings
The problem we have here, is at present, we can't even trust Intel's instrumentation on these chips. These chips have been known to report that they are running cooler than ambient, which is physically impossible. It could be that part of the reason these updates Intel keeps put out are not working, is because their algorithms don't have the proper information coming from the reporting.
@@bujin5455 it happened to me as well, i am getting some core temps 2 degrees below ambient (at idle) lol... like is this breaking fundamental laws of thermodynamics? lol my cooler often gives 2-3 degrees delta above ambient, but its hard to believe even lower temps.
The reason the voltages you read out where still so high is that these where the VID or the voltage that the CPU requests not supplied voltage After the microcode update there is most of the time a quite big gap between VID and Vcore
The value we need to check is the Vcore on the motheboard info panel in HWINFO? under the MOS / PCH etc values? What are the numbers to check to know if there is a degradation? thanks
@@BornIntoThis20 The thing is that you cant really check for degradation just through the voltages. Even the bin of the CPU changes the voltage curve/frequency curve, with lower quality silicon increasing required voltages. The only way to kinda gauge if and a rough estimate of possible degradation is through undervolting and benchmarking to find the lowest stable voltage
@@GamesfriendLP Thanks. Yeah thats what I thought but I'm still a bit confused with the current issue I'm just discovering tbh. Initially I went through all the undervolt msi Liteload presets with extended stress tests (OOCT and all) to find out mode 6 was the lowest truly stable one. Never had any crash ever since, Vcore doesn't go higher than 1,397 V without undervolt or with it and it still performs as new under CBR23. Does it means I'm good for this issue or I'll have to check again the benchmarks and stress tests results regularly under different UV modes to be sure? (Z790i - 13700k - 8 months old bios..) If I understand correctly the new microcode will resolve the problem completly but introducing some perfomance limitations or anything?
@@BornIntoThis20 That sounds about good as the most common threshhold currently people are targeting to stay under is about 1.4 V. Im using a 13700kf (so basically the same chip) and the highest im seeing my Vcore spike after setting my AC loadline down to 0.35 is 1.355 V so I am betting on that being low enough
There is something so many of these builders, and recommendations do not consider. Some of us CANNOT bring our chips back to retailer, as that would leave us without a running system. Waiting 6-8 lifetimes for an RMA to be rejected doesn't solve my computer issues when I have a WFH shift tonight. If the suggestion is RMA, then stow it and just suggest we buy AMD.
Hey. I've had the same issue as you do. After reaching Intel's support, they denied me the "cross-shipping" option which is basically "Send me the new CPU and i'll send you the faulty one after". After explaning why it was important for me to have it, i asked the same question 3 times and eventually they escalated the ticket to some higher resp. which granted me the cross-shipping. You should try and be as annoying as you can, eventually they will accept.
@@iamtropik I'm impressed they have such an option, as the two agents I've just spoken with have tried to convince me it doesn't exist. However, when I can't afford downtime, "Reducing downtime" is not a solution. "Eliminating downtime" would be.
@@digitalmagick I am confused, cross-shipping would eliminate downtime, the idea is that you will have your faulty CPU running, albeit not so well, until you get a new one in the mail to replace it and send back the faulty one. I don’t see how they can do anything about the shipping time.
14900k user. Asus ROG Strix z790. The latest bios raised my voltages past 1.5v and increased temperatures across the board so I went back to my old bios v1102 and everything is a lot better. Pl1=125 PL2=253 ICC Max=307. MCE disabled. All Cores 57x. Voltage never passes 1.3v and temps never above 75c. Smooth sailing. I will wait till the mid August microcode update and see if it's any better at that time.
Exactly same with 13900k and z790 strix e wifi II Asus motherboard. As everyone is saying to do that I updated bios to 1402 and had mine first crash since 8 months with unreal engine. Switched back to 1201 and 5 days of playing. Not a single crash
@@evan-du3vk yeah exactly same Mobo and results as me with the new Bios. It's like they're trying to kill our CPUs faster. And almost all of these tech RUclips channels are pushing the new BIOS which make it worse.
The bios update is the best thing I've done for my computer recently. Temperatures dropped by over 20 degrees for an i5 14600kf. Earlier, when Blender Cycles on the CPU, temperatures went to 100 in 3 seconds, now it was max 81. After a longer time, when the processor goes into long time power limit mode, temperatures drop even more.
Same here w r.t to boost frequency but I see as far as 1.5v for a short burst of time and then settles somewhere in 1.4v range . My mobo Asus Rog strix b760 I gaming .
Dont forgot to mention that the Usb drive needs to be reformatted to FAT32 by right clicking on the drive. That ensures the drive is cleared completely in preparation for the CAP file.
Good info as always. Bought my 13700k a month after release... you CAN NOT have it back. Drop in a Thermalright Anti-Bending Buckle and drop 12 degrees. $10 parts, worth $200 of cooling.
@@_Mystic1978_ for me intel default settings applied too high voltage so i went to asus optimized and set some limits, on volt vcore -o.o5 and cpu vid to -0.04 and under stress test my voltage wont go over 1.38 and max temp is about 82C on a 13700k
Thanks man! I didn't know about that setting but I changed it for my i7-14700K and I went from 31853 (multicore) and 2196 (single core) points on Cinebench R23 with vcore of 1.46v to 30773 (multicore) and 2074 (single core) points with vcore of 1.323 which I don't mind... Temps also decreased a lot.
Why can’t i run neither of XMP profiles without having crashes? I have 4 ram slots 64gb (16gb each) 6800mhz. When i run the lowest xmp 6000mhz it crashes and it does for even higher. I got i9-14900k rtx4090 Z790 maximus formula. Any fix for this beside lowering mhz of ram to 5600mhz or any lower numbers?
I heard something a while ago that there's stability issues with people who run 4 dimm configurations of DDR5 RAM. I would try running your system with 1-2 sticks and see if you still crash. While that might not be what you wanna hear, and might not fix your issue; that was a problem for a lot of people which is why I stuck to 2 sticks. Edit: added 2 words for specificity
@@chrissoto4878 i have 3 xmp profiles for 6000mhz 6400mhz and 6800mhz it works for me on 6000mhz profile but manually put it to 5200mhz on 4 sticks. I have tried two a while ago and still couldn’t run XMP profiles as they are but going to try tomorrow and let you know the case. Thanks for the reply
Just as a notifier for my budget friends out there. You got an i5-13500, i5-13400, i3-13100. Don't worry your die size is at 215 square mm, you have an alder lake die and therefore are less affected by the so called "Raptor Lake issues".
I read that supposedly Vrel for 13th gen is 1.45V under 70c, and 1.3V for 100c. It's probably fine to run those voltages at idle anyway, if you're scared about them disable 2-core boost, that's mostly what makes high requests I think. Depends on silicon too, worst i9 14900k will want 1.5V for 6Ghz, best one 1.4V (based on igor's lab article) About running cinebench on my system, I'm running 14900ks with -110mV offset (dunno LLC, as it's auto, left most voltages at auto/default) limited to 253/253 it's running with 1.2V, at light loads averages 1.3V.
@@michalwiktorow2188 you are replying to a 12day message , before 0129 was released, also even after that even BZ is not 100% confident that it will stop the damage, he himself said if you TRUST Intel then just update the bios and run it like that, IMO anything over 1.45v is sus AF and I won't trust it, specially not after they spent so many months blaming the motherboard manufacturer when it was Intel's fault
I actually did this my self with my 14600kf and i also had high core voltages going to 1.440v and the ghz dropping from 5.3 to 5.1 because it was hitting the 181w limit. So i did an undervolt, fixed the voltages to 1.145 and everything is stable and it runs on its boost clocks easily. 5.3 p cores and 4 ghz e cores stable. And the temperatures went from 96° to 60-70° on 100% load.
14700k, Asus Z790 ProArt, enhanced profile but manually undervolted as soon as I built the PC. Perfectly stable for near a year now and my voltage never went over 1.36.
how do u manually undervolt it? I’m building a pc soon and made my list and i will buy the i7 14700kf, so I’m genuinely interested if i should do all of this stuff undervolt it or idk what else, once i finished the build
@@stevenstramturean Dead easy brother...soon as i built mine, i put a minus 0.0750 offset in and its at 1.275v all the time now max.. was at about 1.360v before which is prob okay but i didnt like it especially if i can lower it alot and still be rock stable... Just hop into the bios find your vcore setting sometimes called diff things depending on the board and you will see offset, press that hit minus then dial in a -0.500 or something, test at that with a game as stesstests dont always bring faults, my experience of building and tweaking intel for over a decade, multiple systems, gaming is where you will see crashes more often than say cinibench or OCCT sometimes, so see if that works, if it does lower the offset some more until you get crashes, it will take time, ya know, i did mine in 5 mins, but if your new it may take an hour or so... But i know what im clicking and looking for instantly... and then just go abit everytime in the bios, soon as you get the crashes, bring it back up by -0.150 maybe then you should be on the good side of the unstable and at the lowest voltage you can have... Its super easy bro... and if you do something bad u always have reset cmos to go back to all the defaults you got it with... I think mine will go lower but i did a quick and dirty offset and its working like a charm... cinibench r23 doesnt go higher than 63c and gaming its around 53c ish... so super cool.
I got a 13980HX laptop... what can we laptop owners do? I'm still under warranty from Asus and I haven't had any issues but I've been undervolting the CPU and since I first became aware of this have been limiting its power usage to around 55-75w and also increased the fan speeds to keep it running cool. Going to reapply new thermal paste soon as well.
After update of the BIOS, the Vcore went down, from 1,45V to 1,30 V. the temp of the p-cores went down from 85+ C to 73 degrees C whith my I5 13600KF. Maybe it was nothing to worry about bit it did lower temps, and that is always good. the results with Cinebench went down a little as well, since the CPU got down from 110% to 100% at testing. In realtime conditions these lower results aren;t noticeble. Thank you for the info .
Try an offset to voltages(over and above intel defaults) to under-volt your CPU, I've undervolted mine (0.1v) and it has helped the temperatures dramatically and mine still happily turbos to 5.3Ghz all core for the first 56 Sec.
Just updated my Z790 Carbon wifi and again nno issues but I always fix or use adaptive vcore with a max limit of 1.325v...I have never let the motherboard handle voltages on auto as it is just abbsurd and can go over 1.45v with ease and it just is not needed. 1.3v should be enough to allow any 13th and 14th gen to boost properly and 1.350v if you really want to push for max scores. Getting 41K in cinebench r23 multi test with temps all under control though using a 360mm aio.
Power limit aint gonna fix this because the problem is with single core boost and a 14900k boosting on 2 cores to 6ghz does not exceed a 125W power limit. Set ratio limit per core to whatever your cpu goes on all core boost example with i9 14900k 2 cores go to 6ghz and 5,6ghz with all cores so u need to set all the cores with a limit 5,6ghz. Another thing you can do is set a core voltage limit but that depends what cpu you got for example with 14900k i would set 1,4V max
As said: The 0x125 bios will give more Vcore and temp! Do not download unless you are having stability issues. This bios is done from broken CPU's! I had the same issue and tackled it at once! Wait till the new Intel microcode gets out!
@@ZombieLincoln666 It did not matter if i used intel fail safe because that is what the standard according to intel should be. Also the Asus extreme profile had to much voltage. I just limited the SVID in total now and not exceeding 1.275volts in any scenario. CPU stays cool and performance is not really inpacted. Also way beter powerwise, consuming a lot less watts.
On my 14600K i have set the IA VR Limit to 1400 mV and the highest I've seen is 1.372 V. Before setting the limit the max I saw was 1.403 V. Running cinebench 24 it goes anywhere from 1.250 to 1.270 V while keeping all p-core 5ghz (and 2-3 of them 5.1ghz). Max temp 92C with freezer 36 cooler.
I don't think this is well known enough - to find the part in the BIOS that can limit the CPUs internal voltage regulator, rather than the more obvious VID settings etc. I set mine to 1400 and my Cinebench score went up by 300 points. 13700k on a Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite X. Max 80 degrees with a EK 240mm AIO.
@@stevexc222 Hi man, I have similar setup (13700K, on a Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX). Can I please ask where to find the option to limit my voltage to 1.400 in Bios?
@@RQ_play There's a video on youtube for it, search for "One setting to limit max core voltage on Gigabyte Z790/Z690 motherboards" Edit: You can skip the first 11 minutes
It is super important for people to suspend BitLocker and save the recovery key before attempting this. Otherwise, if you run disk encryption (which you should!!) you will lose your data.
You need to monitor the Vcore voltage not the Core VID, as Core ViDs is the voltage requested by the CPU, while the Vcore is the actual voltage sent to CPU.
I own i9-14900k, latest bios 2402 on ROG STRIX Z790-H GAMING WIFI VID MAX reach at max 1.492V 96°C and average is around 1.18V, before I always undervolted -0.07 V but bios 2402 with intel default does not allow it anymore, I do not find the offset option. Using Arctic Liquid Freezer III 420 with push pull and no throtling at all. Congratulations for your channel, I learned a lot from you !!
Intel default bios enables undervolt protection setting. search for it in bios and disable. Restart. Go back to bios and now you can undervolt again if thats what you want to do.
@@Abra_Ka_Dabra_008 Hi, thank you for your reply; I searched again this morning and found the option again, I undervolted by default to -0.07V and now all ok, I decreased by 3-4 degrees the temperature.
@@Abra_Ka_Dabra_008 what does there fix actually do ? Is it just updating the bios or do I have to do something additional in the bios after the update?
Always make sure you research user feedback and comments on a new BIOS before updating to the latest one. See if people with your same motherboard or similar family board are having any major issues with the latest BIOS before you update it. I recently made the mistake of not reading comments on one of the latest BIOS updates for my motherboard and had to roll back to the previous BIOS to fix all of the instability and crashes I was suddenly getting.
If you have a 13400f or 13600k just enjoy. The server devs released the failure rates and said the 13600k was less then 2% so enjoy. Mine is perfect and people need to remember motherboard manus are and have been replying bios that don't allow it to go over 1.4volts my asus motherboard already did it and ive never ever ever had and issue yet. I got lucky I didn't run it before that. It's stable has never crashed and is running fantasticly.
Do you have any sources for that 2%? It sounds about right (13600K is not even mentioned in warframe crash report) but I would be interest to know more. I'm also an owner of stable 13600K (so far), so that's why I'm interested.
Its neck and neck with the 12600k but yes. Luckily my new 13600k is very nice also. Hasnt gone over 1.4volts I swear asus has there bios dialed in. I havent had to touch a single thing. Also i had no idea the 13600k was so good lol. @multiicore_
@@reviewforthetube6485 it’s neck and neck but the 13400f runs like 200-300mhz slower on the p cores as it is designed for a 65w tdb and that crap stock cooler. It’s not like it’s 10 times slower than the 12600k lol. It’s Alder Lake so it’s fine. I’d tweak the 13600k if I was you tbh. Disable pointless 1-2 core boost. I5s generally run around 1.3 Volts so you don’t really need to undervolt. But definitely do disable the 1-2 core boost. Raptor Lake was a rushed out architecture.
Hey Bro, I was going to get I5 13600K but I prefer now to go with AMD so, will ryzen 9 7900x + rx 7800xt will be fine with moderate content creation + some gaming?
@@ZiadMustafa-x8n Depends on what you mean by content creation. High core count is generally only good for parallelized processes and of little to no use for most people.
I updated the bios, but also manually set the Intel specfied parameters, like TDP, iccMax, and other things, and also set a undervolt, and my i7 14700KF is running at 60 degrees in games, and 80 degrees in cinebench r23. I don't know what they do in this "intel Default Settings", but it is way too hot for my taste.
what settings did you applied ? PL1 125 & PL2 253W ? I did the same with 14700KF cooled with 360 arctic liquid freezer 2 but I'm reaching > 90 degrees. What's your multiscore in cinebench r23 ? thanks for your reply :)
@@vincenthibschele8929 Hi, I manually set 253W on PL1 and PL2, also set 56 seconds on PL1 and PL2 Power Limit Time. And I also set 307A on iccMAX. This settings are the official recommended settings for a i7 14700. But I aplied a undervolt of -0.100V on Vcore offset. Because this are the Intel Official Settings for the CPU, no performance change was notible, you will get the CPU stock perfomance. But before you do all that, you must certify that your water cooler is propelly optimized to performe well. Good Luck!
I have a 14900K, an ASUS Maximum Z970 Dark Hero, and the latest 1402 BIOS with the 0x125 microcode update. I kept the AI Overclock Tuner set to AUTO and the DRAM frequency to DDR-6400 MHz. I see 6400 MHz in the memory section of the Performance tab in Windows Task Manager, so it appears stable with the AI Overclock Tuner at AUTO.
First of all you need to find the lowest value of AC Line Load at which you won’t experience any throttling or instability. Right down to 0.01 mOhms if possible. Then you need to adjust the DC value to make the Core VIDs equal to real voltage (Vcore). Everything else can be ignored. Not only it will solve this issue but it will reduce the temperatures too.
same I have the Asus Strix B760-F motherboard with the same bios it shipped with and my i7 13700k is running just fine with around 1.28v (sometimes hitting 1.33v), temps just under 90c (on full load) and CPU package at 253w under full load (tends to sit at 35w when not doing much).
@@Canadian76 - I have it set to not go over 90c and I think I have a slight undervolt but cant remember, under 100% load it can spike to 1.442v but for the most part its around 1.33
Since i updated my Z790 Gaming x ax to version F11 i got so many stutter and crash issues with my pc. still not fixed, many people got the same issue like u can see on the gigabyte reddit
WHAT PEOPLE DONT SEEM TO BE POINTING OUT IS THAT , WE GOT ARE 13 AND 14900K BASED ON A PERFORMANCE ADVERTISED , WITH LASTEST ASUS BIOS YOU GET HUGE PERFORMANCE LOSS OVER OLDER SETTINGS , IN SOME CASES, GAMING MOSTLY 12900K PERFORMANCE , YOU DONT SEE 6GIG MAYBE FIR FRACTION OF SEC WHEN COU IS PRETTY IDLE MORE LIKE 5.2G
Still better than AMD tbh. This situation was the norm for AMD chips a few years ago, but nobody batted an eye. Now that it's Intel, everyone wants to chime in and throw their worthless 2¢. Goes to show how big Intel is compared to AMD.
Seriously... I've been laughing at all the little AMD gamers talking crap on Intel as if they're junk and AMD has always been top dog. It's hilarious. These people don't even know how to adjust a few bios settings, or even build a computer probably, and yet they're out here giving out advice and ridiculing others. Freaking 🤡
@@DingleBerryschnappsAMD gamer here, it sure is nice having an efficient cpu that runs minty cool, which you can squeeze out great performance just by PBOing and undervolting it. Well, I just know you guys will get it right next time, eh? You can do it! At least we still have 12th gen out there… 😉~🌟
@@CodeCube-rv1rm See, you're the prime example. Intel dominated and obliterated AMD for 19 out of the 20 previous years, and you speak like AMD was the one who did it. And your CPU doesn't run minty cool, it runs at the same temps as a 14900k in games, and it's not that much faster in games either, plus it's crap in productivity where the 14900k beats it sometimes by 200% higher performance. Yea, must be nice having a CPU that's a one trick pony, except in some cases even that one trick doesn't work, as the v-cache doesn't work in all games or all the time reliably.
Just updated to latest bios, 13700k pushing above 1.5v under idle. All default intel settings. Temps are terrible under cinebench load. Dont know what to do at this point
@etissite i ended up fixing it. After changing to intel default settings profile, changing sa cep and ia cep to auto fixed the low cinebench score and changing svid behavior to auto fixed the 1.5v idle
Switching to AMD means that you will find out again... Their chips will also degrade because of the continuously 95 degrees... You have to tune your Intel chips manually mate and they will live for ever 😉
Although there's truth in what you're saying, this current issue is unique in that the CPU was drawing in high voltages during minimal tasks that was stemming directly from the microcode. So this issue was sort of baked in and happening despite any tuning as far as I understand.
@@timotmon it wasn't stemming directly from the microcode. It's also the motherboard manufacturers. The microcode is mainly going to help users that don't want to go into the BIOS and change the settings manually.
@@DingleBerryschnapps "Intel's been investigating the issue, which it says is because of a microcode fault affecting voltages, and is pushing a microcode fix which has just started rolling out for some motherboards."
My i7 13700K was sometimes reaching 1.5v even with the latest bios, but after locking all my cores at 53x (5.3Ghz), it only goes up to 1.4v rarely now. I heard (and noticed in HWinfo) that it was 2 of my cores that sometimes would boost to 5.4Ghz and then also wanting to pull upwards of 1.5v. I'm still going to try to see if I can reduce the core voltage a little further though. So to keep you CPU from cooking you should really lock all your cores to the same default boost of the CPU you are running to avoid the "single" core boost that Intel has implemented.
@@epeksergastis As I have already locked all cores to 5.3Ghz, I don't experience the single-two core boost anymore, or at least not to the degree as before, if I'm understanding correctly, and my voltage is at 1.35 now, so that's the only thing I want to try to get a little lower, but I haven't experienced any type of problems since I bought and built my PC back at the start of November '23. Also in all of this debacle, I've noticed that generally, it's been people with ASUS boards who have been having problems, and it's not to shift blame unto the board manufacturers, but I still think that it needs to be discussed why this is the case. I had to go with an Asrock board, as there was no ASUS boards in my price range that would fit my requirements, and as I've said, I haven't had any problem since I built my system, oh except for a bad RAM stick that died after a few months.
@@TigonIII Asus has that automatic OC crap which overvolts like crazy. 1.35 is fine, if you can go lower would be dope. Raptor Lake was a rushed out architecture.
If Intel CPUs drop in price because of this drama, I will buy 2 more KS CPUs 🤣🤣🤣 My 13th Gen CPUs have been running fine and on spec since I got them more than a year ago.
@@icecreamsandwichiify Yeah but will that last? I too have a 13700KF, its my baby, but I am worried. And wish gigabyte wasnt such a slow company with their bios updates. Also can I ask what your idle and gaming voltage is of your 13700KF? Ive been trying to find that forever.
@@AyataHiragi Voltage has never gone over 1.388 on the P cores, and 1.344 on the E cores,(Only while gaming )so that's a good sign I think. It's normally below a volt while browsing, sometimes spiking to around 1.2 briefly for a split second. Temps don't go over 84c in stress tests using stock LIM, and hardly ever spiking above 62c(64c sometimes)while running Forbidden West for hours on max settings 1080p getting an average of 120FPS. Idle temps stay below just below 30c using Deepcool AIO. Motherboard is a Z790 MSI P WIFI.
I have a slightly earlier bios version. I currently have voltage offset by -30mV (from day 1). Voltage peaks at 1.18v in cinebench r23 and manages a score of ~35500
This is why everyone should learn to overclock and monitor voltage . I’ve had my 13700k since launch cores locked to 5.5 ghz at 1.32v and no issues since release date
🤕🤒 So much for the high performance of Intel 13 and 14th gen. 🤕 Cutting edge can be bleeding edge. I'm glad my daily driver is a dull boring old 9900K.
I just went full on safe mode until the bios update. Underclocked my 13600K to 4,5 GHz / 3,5 GHz and disabled xmp. And the performance drop is not even that huge, I have 21k in cinebench r23 multicore (instead of 23k stock) and 1750 single core (I don't remeber the original number but it was something colse to 2000). Temps and power consumption dropped even more, 60C max on AK620 and 100W under full load. And maximum Vcore is now 1,08V instead of stock 1,3V. This is obviously an overkill, but I probably won't go back to stock settings after the update, something like 4,8 GHz (P) / 3,7 GHz (E) seems perfectly fine for me, while not pushing the chip to its limits. PS. My cpu is also slightly undervolted since the begging with vf curve points (- 90mV at max frequency) and with lite load set to mode 6.
I own a 12700k, I'm not directly impacted by the entire fiasco, but tbh, I lost my entire trust in Intel... From the fact that they are still selling the impacted units, all the way in how they have handled the situation
they are fine when you buy them but degrade much faster than they should. Raptor Lake is just a beefed up to 11 Alder Lake in order to compete with Zen 4. Half-baked architecture.
I have tuned my 14900k since 2023 and runs fine. Ia cep and cep off, llc 4, ac line .28 and DC line 0.98. Short and long duration 253w. Vcore sits @1.38v under load temps around 80. Have tested multiple dx12 games and vx2 stress test. Hope stays like that.
Lol, don't be an Intel guinea pig. They don't have enough time to test if a BIOS update fixes or further degrades the CPU's in question, much less CPU's that don't have an issue. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If you have a 13th or 14th gen that doesn't have issues, don't update your BIOS. Wait for others to test it out for you, first.
Lololololololol.... "dOn't bE a GuiNea pIG fOr iNTel" Speak for yourself. Some of us know how to build computers and have been doing it a while. Did you know you don't need the microcode update? Did you know you can just adjust the settings in the bios to avoid this problem? There are people that did that on day one and their chips are fine. The microcode is just for people that don't know how, or are too afraid to go into their bios and change a few settings. I'm glad people are scared about this though. I was just able to pick up a brand new Amazon returned 13700k for $230, and now it has a 5-year warranty. Worst case scenario I'll have my chip I paid half price for replaced with a brand new one. 😂 Btw, Intel has been in business for decades, their microcode will work. It's not rocket science. All it's doing is automating what you could do yourself in the bios manually. You're not qualified to speak on this or give out advice.
I undervolted my CPU manually since day 2 of completing my build and haven't updated with May or June microcode since I know I don't need the TVB fixes for my 14700k. I would say with authority that the anxiety even if I've undervolted and my max Vcore so far of 1.344v is not worth it. This is most especially due to intel being shady and not providing clear stance and not even stating which part of the CPU has the degredation problem. Is it the oxidation? Is it just the cores? Is it the IMC getting damaged (which would cause memory instability or program crashes and frequent BSODs )? Is it the cache? There are many people on reddit that turned off cores/downclocked and BSODs go away and there are others that have tried those and what everyone guesses a damaged IMC would be a definitely dead CPU. After all, I bought the damn CPU because I trusted intel that it would be more stable on plenty of programs than AMD aside from my need with highly threaded workloads of editing. Turns out I'm at risk of accelerated degradation without knowing if my undervolt is enough to get the CPU to last me at least 5 years of use without any headaches.
I still get 100C+ even after applying this update (0x129), is anyone else having this issue? Is this normal or am I doing something wrong? In addition, I do not see the option for "Intel Default Settings", can someone point me to where this might be? I have the 13700 non-K variant on a ASRock z690m-itx. Thanks
I missed this video, my PC exploded, house burned down. Very tragic. The dog is still missing, possibly headed to Mexico. Wife and the kids are gone, all Apple users. The cat defected to the neighbors. I should've updated :(
I have never seen my i7 13700k go above 1,360V (with CEP disabled) and i still have my first BIOS from 2022 when i bought my ASUS Prime Z790. I also have no issues with my CPU. Everyone recommends that you set IA & SA CEP to ENABLED in BIOS, but when i do that, my VID voltages jump to 1,45V. When i leave it on DISABLED, my voltages never go above 1,360V.
Highly likely ? My PC store says it’s well less than 10% that’s not highly likely but unlikely . You tech people are scaring people with your click bait .
@@shenchingyeh6000It is unlikely and they dropped the microcode a couple hours ago and it is not that huge of a deal. Just like he says update BIOS and you are mostly safe just try not to overclock it
They forgot to add one 0. Its not 10% but 100%. Every, again every 13th and 14th gen intel CPU is affected. Even 65W ones. If cpu is undervolted, procesy of degradation is just slower.
When I did a test in Cinebench today I got over 1.4 volts in core VIDs, core temp and cpu package temp of 100 C maximum and a result of about 38000. I noticed PL1 and PL2 were set on default. All I did was set IA VR Voltage Limit to 1400, set PL1 to 125W and PL2 to 253W as shown on Intel website for 14700k and disabled enhanced-multicore performance. Now the result is about 29500 but core VIDs voltage does not go above 1.390, and core temp and cpu package temp go up to 90 C.
Not everyone wants AMD. They simply cannot complete with intel for clock speed and multi core power for the same money. Without the extra L3 cache, they would be useless. Even the new AMD 9700x cannot compete with even the i7 14700. If it wasnt for the stability issues, intel would be dominating.
@@nathanzhu5562 These comments are so annoying… most of us already spent the money and have our PCs built. We can’t exactly go and switch to AMD so soon. No doubt AMD will be my next build, but we’re all currently stuck with Intel. Saying “switch to AMD” isn’t a solution ffs.
I've been using a 13700F for over an year now without a BIOS update - not a single issue so far, temps under load can reach 100C for short periods but only 1.2-1.3V on average. May update BIOS once Intel release the new microcode but only after I see tests.
CPU:13900k: Vid Max 1.528. Package max power: 253W. I've noticed with the new BIOS the power is maintained, where previously is still jumped to like 285W. The voltage is still very high, although under load the voltage goes down to 1.25.
Hello, i have a Intel Core i5 14600KF. My problem its the CPU turn to 100° on a high charge. My motherboard is ASUS tuf gaming b760m-plus wifi II, and my CPUFAN is BeQuiet! Pure Rock 2. I have the same settings than you, my CPU FAN was not good?
Asus Z790 Prime, i5 13600k, Deepcool AK620. With Intel default setting I have average values of 197W, 1.417V, 94 degrees Celsius CPU temp and 22518 points in Cinebench R23. If I use the Asus OC setting it is only 158W, 1.251V, 74 degrees Celsius but 23129 points in the R23. I will therefore stick with the Asus setting!
When testing for performance my 14900K, fixed at 1.325v temps high 80's early 90's when running Cinebench R23 with a 41K cinebench r23 multi score. For daily use, fixed vcore 1.3v and again no issues and temps even better. Also I would never lead vcore on auto. Set a fixed or adaptive with a max 1.350v limit as that will provide all the performance and more without any temprature issues whatsoever.
13900k I've used for a few years on custom water. Voltages on latest bios is around 1.3v idle and 1.25 under load. The only thing I have tweaked with the latest bios is increasing my power limits since even under load my temps are under 75C.
Updated my MSI motherboard to the latest and had to go back to the previous bios. My system started running hotter so hopefully the next bios update will be better off
meh... ignore the power limits, and just change the v-core voltages to say 1.35 max. U migh have to go to the LLC setting and choose a setting depening if u want the voltage to droop under load or not. on some motherboards the lowest values(1-10) droop more and on some the highest value droop more under load. So now u are done.
had zero issues the entire time with my 13600k i got used running 5.3ghz latest bios stock volts v1.22 guess im really lucky, that said it wasnt really pushed hard yet.
I updated to the latest bios on MSI Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI for my i7-14700KF hoping it will resolve the crashing and bluescreens and unexpected shut downs. I just gave up and returned back to my MSI B550 Gaming Plus paired with AMD R9 5900x no issues at all. I just wasted a lot of money sadly on Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI and Intel CPU
@@keno921 Hello, yes there are lot of complaints about Intel 14th Gen and 13th Gen and even 12th Gen processors. I suggest that you try to build AM4/5 desktop pc. I have a small mini pc from minisforum AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with external Dock PCIE 3.0/External PSU its running well and no issues at all. I heard there are too concerns over Intel new gen processors Ultra etc and instability issues. Stick with AMD processors AM4/AM5 builds. I am planning to buy AMD Ryzen 7 9700x (AMD new processors) soon.
I have a 13600k on a msi z690 pro p ddr4 mobo. There's a setting called cpu lite load. Have put it on mode 3 after trial and error. Now the cpu runs on 1.2v max all core load and the performance is within 1 percent of mobo default settings. Default max temp in cine bench was 95c and with mode 3 it's high 70s in cinebemch and low 70s in gaming. Using a deepcool assassin 3 for cooling. It's worth a try for those with msi mobos
I'm on Z690 DDR4 Gigabyte with a 13700K and similar issues with still high voltages being requested by the CPU with the newest BIOS. With Intel default profile I also went in to manually set PL1/PL2 to 253W, IccMax to 307A, IA VR to 1385 (1.385V) and undervolted by -75mV adaptive offset. Cinebench R23 multicore scores now at 28,200ish. With only applying the Intel defaults profile, peak CPU temps hit ~86c, with the rest of my limits applied, ~76c
I have a similar setup as you, 13700k + Gigabyte z690 gaming X DDR4. I'm still on a F21 BIOS Version though. What's your turbo power limit set to? Mine is set to Intel POR which limits the PL1/PL2 to 253W, but after testing i've noticed a huge performance loss in C R23. My multicore result went from 30167 (all bios default settings + XMP) to 17545.
I keep hearing bad things about ucode 129, so I stuck with ucode 125. I then undervolted by -.100v. It keeps my max VID and Vcore under 1.4v. It actually raised my R23 score from 35.5K to about 38.5K as well. Fingers crossed this keeps my 14900KF safe.
@theTechNotice it's important to specify that a lot of BIOS Update that contains the new microcode are marked as Beta-BIOS which means it could remove the motherboard warranty
I just installed the CPU yesterday and did Cinebench r24, i only got 1430 points in multicore and 121 in single core. I got an Arctic liquidfreezer iii 360mm aio. Ive set up the recommended powerlimits from intel. The CPU hits nearly instantly 100°C if i start the bench, i dont understand that... Idle temps are around 60°C
There does appear to be random voltage issues based on which bios versions you have aswel which makes no sense. I had to revert back to aprils bios update released back then since updating to the latest one a few days back. I had all the values set to the exact same intel default settings and everything that i was using on the previous bios but was getting worse results and higher voltages and was back to crashing and bluescreening again until i reverted back to the previous bios i had. I seen reports of similar issues from others too. Hopefully the next update with a newer microcode fix will be better but i ain't holding my breath too much lmao
We have 250 Dell's with these chips in.. Zero issues. Everything was correctly setup to begin with as they got it right out of the box. I have similar at home and guess what, i setup and updated the bios correctly. One set of chips were bad... So what, not like amd didn't do that a few years ago or all the macbook keyboards broke for four years.
There is another small tweak in the bios that should be changed, i don't remember exactly how it's called but it has something to do with the cpu voltage, instead of auto change it to adaptive, in auto it will mostly stay at max voltage in idle for some reason then change when the cpu is used, but adaptive will use only what it needs when needed
Thank you for posting this. Just returned a 13th Gen i9 and got a replacement under warranty. Now I need fix the BIOS after an update failed with the faulty CPU - I could not access the BIOS after the update. I will try Q Flash plus in the Gigabyte Aero G Z790 before fitting the new Intel i9-14900K. The issue might have been the file name not being renamed to 'GIGABYTE.bin' on the USB - although every instruction suggested the rename only if updating without the CPU.
ruclips.net/video/sxsvPdQ2aKk/видео.html Here's the video about the issue and what's going on :)
Is there a way i can email you or talk to you on Discord so i can share my Bios photos with you so you can see the settings i use for yourself ?
Fyi i never used the new bios or any new microcode this will initially bork my chip if i do so
i've updated to the latest bios and now my pc is superslow..............
whats about performance ? any decrease performance ?
@@arfanariyanto297
From no-limits/4096W to 253W? Yeah. But it's nothing too bad, literally unnoticeable outside a multi core benchmark score.
Tha fact that something so critical to the health of the chip is just now being addressed blows my mind
Maybe you aren't aware, but investigations take a while.
If you been in the industry long enough, you would remember the games AMD played from 1995-2015. 5 years is not enough of a benchmark for me to trust them.
It's not. I've been using stock Asus OC profile for over 15,000 hours and absolutely no issues.
@@the12gaugeshottybro can you please tell me which Mobo you r using ?
i just wanna buy a motherboard for my new gaming PC . and tell me Cpu also
@@DingleBerryschnapps Maybe you aren't aware, but Intel wasn't investigating until a few weeks ago.
I found something interesting. If I used the Intel Default Profile and MCE off on my 12900K, I found my temperatures were incredibly high, sometimes hitting upwards of 95C+ in games. When I switched to the Asus Advanced OC profile and also disabled MCE, I found my temperatures were back to normal and hovering in the
I'm seeing the same with the 13700k which is curious. I wonder if Asus is now optimizing Intel defaults with their profile and the intel profile default isn't really the safer settings.
thats due to intel's high LLC and VID specifications. ASUS and motherboard vendors were undervolting the cpus out of the box via ACLL and DC_LL....which is actually a good thing.
The 12900K is not in the affected SKU's
You actually have one of the MOST stable i9 chips intel ever made.
AC and DC LL is probably increased in intel defaults?
@@johndough48713930k, 4790k, 10900k has enter the chat.
I bought an i7-14700K on a B760 Gaming X AX in January. The PC ran completely without issues for almost 11 months, and I was satisfied. Last week, a BIOS update came through the Gigabyte software, and since then, I've only had problems, with the PC freezing constantly. I've tried everything: system restore, different BIOS versions, various driver combinations, and even a complete reinstall. It feels like the issue can’t be reversed now, even though it ran smoothly for 11 months. I haven't changed any components or settings.
that's really terrible, did you contact the seller? and rn I'm so confused on choosing cpu. on one hand amd is slower on windows on the other intel is dying!. but intel i9 14th is on sale, just slightly above than i7 14th gen. so do you think you can help with this? should I go with intel or amd? i need an PC asap but I'm sooo stuck.
@@jasson7106definetly go for a AMD. I should have as well. Depending on the money you wanna spent go for the Ryzen 7 7800x3D or the new one Ryzen 9 7950x3D.
@@larsschiller3585 7800x3d is more bang for the buck.
I have a similar issue, my 14700KF seems to be causing complete system lock up. It was random at first but within a week it turned into what it seems to be a permanent issue. My computer will boot past bios but then will freeze either immediately after putting my PIN or sometimes it won’t even get that far.
There is nothing wrong with your computer. The problem is that the update/reinstall/default settings changed settings in your bios.
See if you don't know, don't change stuff. There is no reason to update bios on a 11 month old computer.
So because of this new settings, you now don't know which are changed and you should double check your bios settings, like everything.
From cpu clock/volts to
Memory ram clocks/volts to other advanced settings 4g decoding, rebar, turbo boost, c states, e cores. Some motherboard has certain 'modes' that might be changed as well like turbo power limits, game boost ect ect.
I know 100% your watts/voltage are higher then it should that's why you get freezing, stuttering and poor performance. Because your setting are changed and if you restored it to default then you messed it up even more and you need to set everything manually again.
Good luck 👍
I did the same test with my 13600k and ended up with around 1.4v and around 90'C in HWinfo. What fixed it was going into the 'SVID Behaviour' settings and selecting 'Best Case Scenario'. Now my Voltages are around 1.2 - 1.25 during Cinebench.
Typical scenario is actually the one to use The Best Case will crash because it is running too lean.
did you lose or gain performance?
ive always done manual OC's on my PCs so i wouldnt be surprised that the motherboard manufactures or even intel are aware of the overvoltes of their "Auto" settings
The problem we have here, is at present, we can't even trust Intel's instrumentation on these chips. These chips have been known to report that they are running cooler than ambient, which is physically impossible. It could be that part of the reason these updates Intel keeps put out are not working, is because their algorithms don't have the proper information coming from the reporting.
@@bujin5455 it happened to me as well, i am getting some core temps 2 degrees below ambient (at idle) lol... like is this breaking fundamental laws of thermodynamics? lol my cooler often gives 2-3 degrees delta above ambient, but its hard to believe even lower temps.
High voltage is due to peak turbo boost jumps - disable turbo boost max 3.0 and thermal velocity boost, not high tdp.
The reason the voltages you read out where still so high is that these where the VID or the voltage that the CPU requests not supplied voltage
After the microcode update there is most of the time a quite big gap between VID and Vcore
The value we need to check is the Vcore on the motheboard info panel in HWINFO? under the MOS / PCH etc values? What are the numbers to check to know if there is a degradation? thanks
@@BornIntoThis20 HWmonitor makes this easier to find but in HWINFO i think it is VR VCC voltage directly from the CPU or the Vcore from the mainboard
@@BornIntoThis20 The thing is that you cant really check for degradation just through the voltages. Even the bin of the CPU changes the voltage curve/frequency curve, with lower quality silicon increasing required voltages. The only way to kinda gauge if and a rough estimate of possible degradation is through undervolting and benchmarking to find the lowest stable voltage
@@GamesfriendLP Thanks. Yeah thats what I thought but I'm still a bit confused with the current issue I'm just discovering tbh. Initially I went through all the undervolt msi Liteload presets with extended stress tests (OOCT and all) to find out mode 6 was the lowest truly stable one. Never had any crash ever since, Vcore doesn't go higher than 1,397 V without undervolt or with it and it still performs as new under CBR23. Does it means I'm good for this issue or I'll have to check again the benchmarks and stress tests results regularly under different UV modes to be sure? (Z790i - 13700k - 8 months old bios..) If I understand correctly the new microcode will resolve the problem completly but introducing some perfomance limitations or anything?
@@BornIntoThis20 That sounds about good as the most common threshhold currently people are targeting to stay under is about 1.4 V. Im using a 13700kf (so basically the same chip) and the highest im seeing my Vcore spike after setting my AC loadline down to 0.35 is 1.355 V so I am betting on that being low enough
There is something so many of these builders, and recommendations do not consider.
Some of us CANNOT bring our chips back to retailer, as that would leave us without a running system.
Waiting 6-8 lifetimes for an RMA to be rejected doesn't solve my computer issues when I have a WFH shift tonight.
If the suggestion is RMA, then stow it and just suggest we buy AMD.
Hey. I've had the same issue as you do. After reaching Intel's support, they denied me the "cross-shipping" option which is basically "Send me the new CPU and i'll send you the faulty one after". After explaning why it was important for me to have it, i asked the same question 3 times and eventually they escalated the ticket to some higher resp. which granted me the cross-shipping. You should try and be as annoying as you can, eventually they will accept.
@@iamtropik I'm impressed they have such an option, as the two agents I've just spoken with have tried to convince me it doesn't exist. However, when I can't afford downtime, "Reducing downtime" is not a solution. "Eliminating downtime" would be.
@@digitalmagick I am confused, cross-shipping would eliminate downtime, the idea is that you will have your faulty CPU running, albeit not so well, until you get a new one in the mail to replace it and send back the faulty one.
I don’t see how they can do anything about the shipping time.
Your CPU is not cooked. Just do a negative offset on your BCLK Adaptive voltage to about 01.0000 and you'll be stable with temps around the high 80's.
Can you dumb this down for a noob 😅
@@MsVamPireChicit’s in you bios cpu settin, named that
After the BIOS update im not able to put offset voltage :| Any ideas why?
@@BlezzUMen same here. Cant undervolt.
@@SPARTS3000 disable undervolt protection and virtualization in bios, then you should be able to offset negative
14900k user. Asus ROG Strix z790. The latest bios raised my voltages past 1.5v and increased temperatures across the board so I went back to my old bios v1102 and everything is a lot better. Pl1=125 PL2=253 ICC Max=307. MCE disabled. All Cores 57x. Voltage never passes 1.3v and temps never above 75c. Smooth sailing. I will wait till the mid August microcode update and see if it's any better at that time.
Exactly same with 13900k and z790 strix e wifi II Asus motherboard. As everyone is saying to do that I updated bios to 1402 and had mine first crash since 8 months with unreal engine. Switched back to 1201 and 5 days of playing. Not a single crash
I have heard people mentioning that updating to the bios with the microcode 0x125 was worse, so maybe you experienced the same.
this is the way. 1.5V = death voltage
@@evan-du3vk yeah exactly same Mobo and results as me with the new Bios. It's like they're trying to kill our CPUs faster. And almost all of these tech RUclips channels are pushing the new BIOS which make it worse.
@@TigonIII yep, the new microcode bios updates are complete garbage and make things way worse than they already are.
The bios update is the best thing I've done for my computer recently. Temperatures dropped by over 20 degrees for an i5 14600kf. Earlier, when Blender Cycles on the CPU, temperatures went to 100 in 3 seconds, now it was max 81. After a longer time, when the processor goes into long time power limit mode, temperatures drop even more.
While my temps and voltages are fine with the new microcode, my 13600k won't boost to 5.1Ghz during cinebench anymore. It goes as far as 4.8Ghz.
Same here w r.t to boost frequency but I see as far as 1.5v for a short burst of time and then settles somewhere in 1.4v range . My mobo Asus Rog strix b760 I gaming .
Reference:
msi z690 - 13700k - AIO water cool
bios 7D30v1K
no power limit - voltage 1.285 override mode - digitAll line mode 2
cinebnench r23: 28383 -90c
I updated and mine also still uses 1.4 volt I'm so confused, my temps went up too
Dont forgot to mention that the Usb drive needs to be reformatted to FAT32 by right clicking on the drive. That ensures the drive is cleared completely in preparation for the CAP file.
yes, thanks for the addition!
Good info as always.
Bought my 13700k a month after release... you CAN NOT have it back. Drop in a Thermalright Anti-Bending Buckle and drop 12 degrees. $10 parts, worth $200 of cooling.
how is that related to voltage?
You forgot the most important setting to keep the voltages flat. Go to IA VR voltage limit and set it to 1350mv . Done!
@@michaelalexander7879 yep you only need to set it like i said. Nothing else and you Will be safe
@@_Mystic1978_ for me intel default settings applied too high voltage so i went to asus optimized and set some limits, on volt vcore -o.o5 and cpu vid to -0.04 and under stress test my voltage wont go over 1.38 and max temp is about 82C on a 13700k
How to set it? it is in "enable" mode and can't change it for my own setting. Asus BIOS.
Thanks man! I didn't know about that setting but I changed it for my i7-14700K and I went from 31853 (multicore) and 2196 (single core) points on Cinebench R23 with vcore of 1.46v to 30773 (multicore) and 2074 (single core) points with vcore of 1.323 which I don't mind... Temps also decreased a lot.
How do you configure the IA VR Voltage Limit when it’s set to Auto and greyed out without allowing to change it?
Why can’t i run neither of XMP profiles without having crashes? I have 4 ram slots 64gb (16gb each) 6800mhz. When i run the lowest xmp 6000mhz it crashes and it does for even higher. I got i9-14900k rtx4090 Z790 maximus formula. Any fix for this beside lowering mhz of ram to 5600mhz or any lower numbers?
I have the exact same specs and I am crashing even without xmp on multiple games seems our cpus are cooked
I heard something a while ago that there's stability issues with people who run 4 dimm configurations of DDR5 RAM.
I would try running your system with 1-2 sticks and see if you still crash.
While that might not be what you wanna hear, and might not fix your issue; that was a problem for a lot of people which is why I stuck to 2 sticks.
Edit: added 2 words for specificity
@@chrissoto4878 i have 3 xmp profiles for 6000mhz 6400mhz and 6800mhz it works for me on 6000mhz profile but manually put it to 5200mhz on 4 sticks. I have tried two a while ago and still couldn’t run XMP profiles as they are but going to try tomorrow and let you know the case. Thanks for the reply
It’s because the memory controller can’t handle 4 sticks of ram. Google it
Check the manual to make sure your memory is sitting in the right slots. This fixed the problem for me.
Just as a notifier for my budget friends out there. You got an i5-13500, i5-13400, i3-13100. Don't worry your die size is at 215 square mm, you have an alder lake die and therefore are less affected by the so called "Raptor Lake issues".
@@xxzmk that's a relief 😅... (13500 user)
not affected at all*
What about us i5-14500 users??😅.
@@ashpatel1022 not affected at all. The 14500 is a higher clocked Alder Lake 13500. An insanely good chip.
@@xxzmk Actually, for the 13400F, stepping B0 is Raptor Lake, C0 is Alder Lake.
I read that supposedly Vrel for 13th gen is 1.45V under 70c, and 1.3V for 100c.
It's probably fine to run those voltages at idle anyway, if you're scared about them disable 2-core boost, that's mostly what makes high requests I think.
Depends on silicon too, worst i9 14900k will want 1.5V for 6Ghz, best one 1.4V (based on igor's lab article)
About running cinebench on my system, I'm running 14900ks with -110mV offset (dunno LLC, as it's auto, left most voltages at auto/default) limited to 253/253 it's running with 1.2V, at light loads averages 1.3V.
No, anything over 1.40v will do damage to the ring, you want to undervolt/underclock the CPU to the point it never requests more than 1.40v
@@ivantsipr Dude, it is shown on MANY YT vids that after 0x129 CPU (measured socket voltages) are above 1,45V this was checeked by Buildzoid?!
@@michalwiktorow2188 you are replying to a 12day message , before 0129 was released, also even after that even BZ is not 100% confident that it will stop the damage, he himself said if you TRUST Intel then just update the bios and run it like that, IMO anything over 1.45v is sus AF and I won't trust it, specially not after they spent so many months blaming the motherboard manufacturer when it was Intel's fault
@@ivantsipr My bad then, also YT suggestion alghorithm.
@@michalwiktorow2188 no hard feelings 👍
I actually did this my self with my 14600kf and i also had high core voltages going to 1.440v and the ghz dropping from 5.3 to 5.1 because it was hitting the 181w limit. So i did an undervolt, fixed the voltages to 1.145 and everything is stable and it runs on its boost clocks easily. 5.3 p cores and 4 ghz e cores stable. And the temperatures went from 96° to 60-70° on 100% load.
I applied an offset voltage of -0.100v on my 14900k with bios updated and is still running fine
-.1 is way too high your probably clocking stretching turn of cep and let’s how stabl that undervolt is
@@merkedgg6322 my 14900k with an AsRock Nova Wifi is perfectly stable.
Waiting for the bios fix probably i'll put it back to -0.050
@@merkedgg6322 it's just until Intel release the fix. For now everything is stable on my Asrock Nova Wifi.
IDK if this will work when in a game or in a program
@@aladdin7387 this is for cinebench or the processor goes on TT
14700k, Asus Z790 ProArt, enhanced profile but manually undervolted as soon as I built the PC. Perfectly stable for near a year now and my voltage never went over 1.36.
how do u manually undervolt it? I’m building a pc soon and made my list and i will buy the i7 14700kf, so I’m genuinely interested if i should do all of this stuff undervolt it or idk what else, once i finished the build
@@stevenstramturean Negative VID offset and a hard volt limit in BIOS. It's going to be different for each BIOS. Plenty of tutorials out there.
@@stevenstramturean Dead easy brother...soon as i built mine, i put a minus 0.0750 offset in and its at 1.275v all the time now max.. was at about 1.360v before which is prob okay but i didnt like it especially if i can lower it alot and still be rock stable... Just hop into the bios find your vcore setting sometimes called diff things depending on the board and you will see offset, press that hit minus then dial in a -0.500 or something, test at that with a game as stesstests dont always bring faults, my experience of building and tweaking intel for over a decade, multiple systems, gaming is where you will see crashes more often than say cinibench or OCCT sometimes, so see if that works, if it does lower the offset some more until you get crashes, it will take time, ya know, i did mine in 5 mins, but if your new it may take an hour or so... But i know what im clicking and looking for instantly... and then just go abit everytime in the bios, soon as you get the crashes, bring it back up by -0.150 maybe then you should be on the good side of the unstable and at the lowest voltage you can have... Its super easy bro... and if you do something bad u always have reset cmos to go back to all the defaults you got it with... I think mine will go lower but i did a quick and dirty offset and its working like a charm... cinibench r23 doesnt go higher than 63c and gaming its around 53c ish... so super cool.
I got a 13980HX laptop... what can we laptop owners do? I'm still under warranty from Asus and I haven't had any issues but I've been undervolting the CPU and since I first became aware of this have been limiting its power usage to around 55-75w and also increased the fan speeds to keep it running cool. Going to reapply new thermal paste soon as well.
I don't know if it's even been an issue for laptops. They're already ran with a lot less voltage.
@@tradingnichols2255 Not as much but they still easily go over 1.4hz with the 13900hx+ at least in my experience.
After update of the BIOS, the Vcore went down, from 1,45V to 1,30 V. the temp of the p-cores went down from 85+ C to 73 degrees C whith my I5 13600KF. Maybe it was nothing to worry about bit it did lower temps, and that is always good. the results with Cinebench went down a little as well, since the CPU got down from 110% to 100% at testing. In realtime conditions these lower results aren;t noticeble. Thank you for the info .
Thank you for creating this mate
Try an offset to voltages(over and above intel defaults) to under-volt your CPU, I've undervolted mine (0.1v) and it has helped the temperatures dramatically and mine still happily turbos to 5.3Ghz all core for the first 56 Sec.
MSI just releases new bios x129 today
for those MSI user can now update to the latest bios right now
Just updated my Z790 Carbon wifi and again nno issues but I always fix or use adaptive vcore with a max limit of 1.325v...I have never let the motherboard handle voltages on auto as it is just abbsurd and can go over 1.45v with ease and it just is not needed. 1.3v should be enough to allow any 13th and 14th gen to boost properly and 1.350v if you really want to push for max scores. Getting 41K in cinebench r23 multi test with temps all under control though using a 360mm aio.
@@vMaxHeadroom did u OC ur mobo and how much did u get?im trying 5.6 but the temp too high
Power limit aint gonna fix this because the problem is with single core boost and a 14900k boosting on 2 cores to 6ghz does not exceed a 125W power limit. Set ratio limit per core to whatever your cpu goes on all core boost example with i9 14900k 2 cores go to 6ghz and 5,6ghz with all cores so u need to set all the cores with a limit 5,6ghz. Another thing you can do is set a core voltage limit but that depends what cpu you got for example with 14900k i would set 1,4V max
As said: The 0x125 bios will give more Vcore and temp! Do not download unless you are having stability issues. This bios is done from broken CPU's! I had the same issue and tackled it at once!
Wait till the new Intel microcode gets out!
I've noticed that. Thanks. I've never gone over 77 degrees and after updating. It went to 100c 😮
It’s probably because you have SVID behavior set to “intel failsafe”
@@ZombieLincoln666 It did not matter if i used intel fail safe because that is what the standard according to intel should be.
Also the Asus extreme profile had to much voltage.
I just limited the SVID in total now and not exceeding 1.275volts in any scenario.
CPU stays cool and performance is not really inpacted. Also way beter powerwise, consuming a lot less watts.
On my 14600K i have set the IA VR Limit to 1400 mV and the highest I've seen is 1.372 V. Before setting the limit the max I saw was 1.403 V. Running cinebench 24 it goes anywhere from 1.250 to 1.270 V while keeping all p-core 5ghz (and 2-3 of them 5.1ghz). Max temp 92C with freezer 36 cooler.
I don't think this is well known enough - to find the part in the BIOS that can limit the CPUs internal voltage regulator, rather than the more obvious VID settings etc. I set mine to 1400 and my Cinebench score went up by 300 points. 13700k on a Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite X. Max 80 degrees with a EK 240mm AIO.
@@stevexc222
Hi man,
I have similar setup (13700K, on a Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX).
Can I please ask where to find the option to limit my voltage to 1.400 in Bios?
@@RQ_play There's a video on youtube for it, search for "One setting to limit max core voltage on Gigabyte Z790/Z690 motherboards" Edit: You can skip the first 11 minutes
It is super important for people to suspend BitLocker and save the recovery key before attempting this. Otherwise, if you run disk encryption (which you should!!) you will lose your data.
You need to monitor the Vcore voltage not the Core VID, as Core ViDs is the voltage requested by the CPU, while the Vcore is the actual voltage sent to CPU.
I own i9-14900k, latest bios 2402 on ROG STRIX Z790-H GAMING WIFI VID MAX reach at max 1.492V 96°C and average is around 1.18V, before I always undervolted -0.07 V but bios 2402 with intel default does not allow it anymore, I do not find the offset option. Using Arctic Liquid Freezer III 420 with push pull and no throtling at all. Congratulations for your channel, I learned a lot from you !!
Intel default bios enables undervolt protection setting. search for it in bios and disable. Restart. Go back to bios and now you can undervolt again if thats what you want to do.
@@Abra_Ka_Dabra_008 Hi, thank you for your reply; I searched again this morning and found the option again, I undervolted by default to -0.07V and now all ok, I decreased by 3-4 degrees the temperature.
So does new bios protect intel chips or what????
@@TheOneGhost12 no one knows for sure. Too early to make a call. Intel says it does if you are willing to believe them
@@Abra_Ka_Dabra_008 what does there fix actually do ? Is it just updating the bios or do I have to do something additional in the bios after the update?
Always make sure you research user feedback and comments on a new BIOS before updating to the latest one. See if people with your same motherboard or similar family board are having any major issues with the latest BIOS before you update it. I recently made the mistake of not reading comments on one of the latest BIOS updates for my motherboard and had to roll back to the previous BIOS to fix all of the instability and crashes I was suddenly getting.
If you have a 13400f or 13600k just enjoy. The server devs released the failure rates and said the 13600k was less then 2% so enjoy.
Mine is perfect and people need to remember motherboard manus are and have been replying bios that don't allow it to go over 1.4volts my asus motherboard already did it and ive never ever ever had and issue yet. I got lucky I didn't run it before that. It's stable has never crashed and is running fantasticly.
13400F here and that sounds bliss... Thx for the info! 👌
Do you have any sources for that 2%? It sounds about right (13600K is not even mentioned in warframe crash report) but I would be interest to know more. I'm also an owner of stable 13600K (so far), so that's why I'm interested.
13400f is Alder Lake. Unaffected and runs slower than a stock 12600k anyways so no issues at all with this CPU.
Its neck and neck with the 12600k but yes. Luckily my new 13600k is very nice also. Hasnt gone over 1.4volts I swear asus has there bios dialed in. I havent had to touch a single thing. Also i had no idea the 13600k was so good lol. @multiicore_
@@reviewforthetube6485 it’s neck and neck but the 13400f runs like 200-300mhz slower on the p cores as it is designed for a 65w tdb and that crap stock cooler. It’s not like it’s 10 times slower than the 12600k lol.
It’s Alder Lake so it’s fine.
I’d tweak the 13600k if I was you tbh. Disable pointless 1-2 core boost. I5s generally run around 1.3 Volts so you don’t really need to undervolt. But definitely do disable the 1-2 core boost.
Raptor Lake was a rushed out architecture.
14900k.... LImit power at 253w then undervolt to 0.800, and is Gold. (I'm averaging 1.2v per core with maximum performace)
Hey Bro, I was going to get I5 13600K but I prefer now to go with AMD so, will ryzen 9 7900x + rx 7800xt will be fine with moderate content creation + some gaming?
The i5-13600K competes with the Ryzen 7700X, not 7900X.
it will be fine.
@@JAnx01 yes but I've saw reviews says that when we talk about content creation the 7900x is much better, or this is wrong?
@@ZiadMustafa-x8n Depends on what you mean by content creation. High core count is generally only good for parallelized processes and of little to no use for most people.
@@JAnx01 thanks bro I got it, you ar correct I will do video editing beside designing but at most times I only do one task then the other
I would suggest setting the voltage manually to around 1.2 or maybe 1.25 but definitely NOT 1.46v. We did this to my sons and it has behaved well.
I updated the bios, but also manually set the Intel specfied parameters, like TDP, iccMax, and other things, and also set a undervolt, and my i7 14700KF is running at 60 degrees in games, and 80 degrees in cinebench r23. I don't know what they do in this "intel Default Settings", but it is way too hot for my taste.
what settings did you applied ? PL1 125 & PL2 253W ? I did the same with 14700KF cooled with 360 arctic liquid freezer 2 but I'm reaching > 90 degrees. What's your multiscore in cinebench r23 ? thanks for your reply :)
@PorDentrodoJogo
@@vincenthibschele8929 Hi, I manually set 253W on PL1 and PL2, also set 56 seconds on PL1 and PL2 Power Limit Time. And I also set 307A on iccMAX. This settings are the official recommended settings for a i7 14700. But I aplied a undervolt of -0.100V on Vcore offset. Because this are the Intel Official Settings for the CPU, no performance change was notible, you will get the CPU stock perfomance. But before you do all that, you must certify that your water cooler is propelly optimized to performe well. Good Luck!
hi! i need your help.. I wonder if you could help me?
I have a 14900K, an ASUS Maximum Z970 Dark Hero, and the latest 1402 BIOS with the 0x125 microcode update. I kept the AI Overclock Tuner set to AUTO and the DRAM frequency to DDR-6400 MHz. I see 6400 MHz in the memory section of the Performance tab in Windows Task Manager, so it appears stable with the AI Overclock Tuner at AUTO.
Thanks for this
My pleasure!
First of all you need to find the lowest value of AC Line Load at which you won’t experience any throttling or instability. Right down to 0.01 mOhms if possible. Then you need to adjust the DC value to make the Core VIDs equal to real voltage (Vcore). Everything else can be ignored. Not only it will solve this issue but it will reduce the temperatures too.
Mine is a 13700k im not updating my microcode cuz my comp is working beautifully
same I have the Asus Strix B760-F motherboard with the same bios it shipped with and my i7 13700k is running just fine with around 1.28v (sometimes hitting 1.33v), temps just under 90c (on full load) and CPU package at 253w under full load (tends to sit at 35w when not doing much).
@@virtuaconker85Have you got an undervolt on that?
@@Canadian76 - I have it set to not go over 90c and I think I have a slight undervolt but cant remember, under 100% load it can spike to 1.442v but for the most part its around 1.33
Since i updated my Z790 Gaming x ax to version F11 i got so many stutter and crash issues with my pc.
still not fixed, many people got the same issue like u can see on the gigabyte reddit
WHAT PEOPLE DONT SEEM TO BE POINTING OUT IS THAT , WE GOT ARE 13 AND 14900K BASED ON A PERFORMANCE ADVERTISED , WITH LASTEST ASUS BIOS YOU GET HUGE PERFORMANCE LOSS OVER OLDER SETTINGS , IN SOME CASES, GAMING MOSTLY 12900K PERFORMANCE , YOU DONT SEE 6GIG MAYBE FIR FRACTION OF SEC WHEN COU IS PRETTY IDLE MORE LIKE 5.2G
14700k post bios should be 35k in Cinebench r23 and 39k-40k for a 14900k..
Still better than AMD tbh. This situation was the norm for AMD chips a few years ago, but nobody batted an eye. Now that it's Intel, everyone wants to chime in and throw their worthless 2¢. Goes to show how big Intel is compared to AMD.
Seriously...
I've been laughing at all the little AMD gamers talking crap on Intel as if they're junk and AMD has always been top dog. It's hilarious.
These people don't even know how to adjust a few bios settings, or even build a computer probably, and yet they're out here giving out advice and ridiculing others.
Freaking 🤡
@@DingleBerryschnappsAMD gamer here, it sure is nice having an efficient cpu that runs minty cool, which you can squeeze out great performance just by PBOing and undervolting it. Well, I just know you guys will get it right next time, eh? You can do it! At least we still have 12th gen out there…
😉~🌟
This comment!
@@CodeCube-rv1rm See, you're the prime example. Intel dominated and obliterated AMD for 19 out of the 20 previous years, and you speak like AMD was the one who did it. And your CPU doesn't run minty cool, it runs at the same temps as a 14900k in games, and it's not that much faster in games either, plus it's crap in productivity where the 14900k beats it sometimes by 200% higher performance.
Yea, must be nice having a CPU that's a one trick pony, except in some cases even that one trick doesn't work, as the v-cache doesn't work in all games or all the time reliably.
Just updated to latest bios, 13700k pushing above 1.5v under idle. All default intel settings. Temps are terrible under cinebench load. Dont know what to do at this point
Go back to previous bios update . Works better and lower temps. I did
@etissite i ended up fixing it. After changing to intel default settings profile, changing sa cep and ia cep to auto fixed the low cinebench score and changing svid behavior to auto fixed the 1.5v idle
Switching to AMD means that you will find out again... Their chips will also degrade because of the continuously 95 degrees... You have to tune your Intel chips manually mate and they will live for ever 😉
Although there's truth in what you're saying, this current issue is unique in that the CPU was drawing in high voltages during minimal tasks that was stemming directly from the microcode. So this issue was sort of baked in and happening despite any tuning as far as I understand.
@@timotmon it wasn't stemming directly from the microcode. It's also the motherboard manufacturers.
The microcode is mainly going to help users that don't want to go into the BIOS and change the settings manually.
@@DingleBerryschnapps "Intel's been investigating the issue, which it says is because of a microcode fault affecting voltages, and is pushing a microcode fix which has just started rolling out for some motherboards."
I doubt that modern Ryzens run so hot. An I'm a 13600K user by the record, not an AMD fanboy.
My i7 13700K was sometimes reaching 1.5v even with the latest bios, but after locking all my cores at 53x (5.3Ghz), it only goes up to 1.4v rarely now. I heard (and noticed in HWinfo) that it was 2 of my cores that sometimes would boost to 5.4Ghz and then also wanting to pull upwards of 1.5v.
I'm still going to try to see if I can reduce the core voltage a little further though.
So to keep you CPU from cooking you should really lock all your cores to the same default boost of the CPU you are running to avoid the "single" core boost that Intel has implemented.
disable single-two core boost and aim for 1.3 Volts all core.
@@epeksergastis As I have already locked all cores to 5.3Ghz, I don't experience the single-two core boost anymore, or at least not to the degree as before, if I'm understanding correctly, and my voltage is at 1.35 now, so that's the only thing I want to try to get a little lower, but I haven't experienced any type of problems since I bought and built my PC back at the start of November '23.
Also in all of this debacle, I've noticed that generally, it's been people with ASUS boards who have been having problems, and it's not to shift blame unto the board manufacturers, but I still think that it needs to be discussed why this is the case. I had to go with an Asrock board, as there was no ASUS boards in my price range that would fit my requirements, and as I've said, I haven't had any problem since I built my system, oh except for a bad RAM stick that died after a few months.
@@TigonIII Asus has that automatic OC crap which overvolts like crazy.
1.35 is fine, if you can go lower would be dope.
Raptor Lake was a rushed out architecture.
If Intel CPUs drop in price because of this drama, I will buy 2 more KS CPUs 🤣🤣🤣
My 13th Gen CPUs have been running fine and on spec since I got them more than a year ago.
My 13700kf is wonderful using stock settings with none of these voltage issues. It's been a year.
@@icecreamsandwichiify Yeah but will that last?
I too have a 13700KF, its my baby, but I am worried. And wish gigabyte wasnt such a slow company with their bios updates.
Also can I ask what your idle and gaming voltage is of your 13700KF? Ive been trying to find that forever.
@@AyataHiragi Voltage has never gone over 1.388 on the P cores, and 1.344 on the E cores,(Only while gaming )so that's a good sign I think. It's normally below a volt while browsing, sometimes spiking to around 1.2 briefly for a split second. Temps don't go over 84c in stress tests using stock LIM, and hardly ever spiking above 62c(64c sometimes)while running Forbidden West for hours on max settings 1080p getting an average of 120FPS. Idle temps stay below just below 30c using Deepcool AIO. Motherboard is a Z790 MSI P WIFI.
@@icecreamsandwichiify Thank you
I have a slightly earlier bios version. I currently have voltage offset by -30mV (from day 1). Voltage peaks at 1.18v in cinebench r23 and manages a score of ~35500
Golden sample you got
@@Abra_Ka_Dabra_008 Unfortunately I think ive got the instability issue anyway. Cinebench runs fine but CS2 and fortnite have issues
@@slimjim2971 sorry to hear
This is why everyone should learn to overclock and monitor voltage . I’ve had my 13700k since launch cores locked to 5.5 ghz at 1.32v and no issues since release date
🤕🤒 So much for the high performance of Intel 13 and 14th gen. 🤕 Cutting edge can be bleeding edge. I'm glad my daily driver is a dull boring old 9900K.
You literally don't even know if the performance is going to take a hit or not.
Fyi, buildzoid already proved it won't. ✌️
I just went full on safe mode until the bios update. Underclocked my 13600K to 4,5 GHz / 3,5 GHz and disabled xmp. And the performance drop is not even that huge, I have 21k in cinebench r23 multicore (instead of 23k stock) and 1750 single core (I don't remeber the original number but it was something colse to 2000). Temps and power consumption dropped even more, 60C max on AK620 and 100W under full load. And maximum Vcore is now 1,08V instead of stock 1,3V. This is obviously an overkill, but I probably won't go back to stock settings after the update, something like 4,8 GHz (P) / 3,7 GHz (E) seems perfectly fine for me, while not pushing the chip to its limits.
PS. My cpu is also slightly undervolted since the begging with vf curve points (- 90mV at max frequency) and with lite load set to mode 6.
Only 100W with 13600k. I got 13500, and it draws around 150W, and when I undervolt it, it becomes unstable.
I own a 12700k, I'm not directly impacted by the entire fiasco, but tbh, I lost my entire trust in Intel... From the fact that they are still selling the impacted units, all the way in how they have handled the situation
they are fine when you buy them but degrade much faster than they should.
Raptor Lake is just a beefed up to 11 Alder Lake in order to compete with Zen 4. Half-baked architecture.
I have tuned my 14900k since 2023 and runs fine. Ia cep and cep off, llc 4, ac line .28 and DC line 0.98. Short and long duration 253w. Vcore sits @1.38v under load temps around 80. Have tested multiple dx12 games and vx2 stress test. Hope stays like that.
Lol, don't be an Intel guinea pig. They don't have enough time to test if a BIOS update fixes or further degrades the CPU's in question, much less CPU's that don't have an issue. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If you have a 13th or 14th gen that doesn't have issues, don't update your BIOS. Wait for others to test it out for you, first.
Yeah I haven't had any problems with my 13700k so I'm just not gonna bother
Lololololololol....
"dOn't bE a GuiNea pIG fOr iNTel"
Speak for yourself. Some of us know how to build computers and have been doing it a while.
Did you know you don't need the microcode update? Did you know you can just adjust the settings in the bios to avoid this problem? There are people that did that on day one and their chips are fine.
The microcode is just for people that don't know how, or are too afraid to go into their bios and change a few settings.
I'm glad people are scared about this though. I was just able to pick up a brand new Amazon returned 13700k for $230, and now it has a 5-year warranty.
Worst case scenario I'll have my chip I paid half price for replaced with a brand new one. 😂
Btw, Intel has been in business for decades, their microcode will work. It's not rocket science. All it's doing is automating what you could do yourself in the bios manually.
You're not qualified to speak on this or give out advice.
@@DingleBerryschnappssame boat here, only thing I'm getting from this Intel fiasco is dirt cheap CPUs 🤑
I undervolted my CPU manually since day 2 of completing my build and haven't updated with May or June microcode since I know I don't need the TVB fixes for my 14700k. I would say with authority that the anxiety even if I've undervolted and my max Vcore so far of 1.344v is not worth it. This is most especially due to intel being shady and not providing clear stance and not even stating which part of the CPU has the degredation problem. Is it the oxidation? Is it just the cores? Is it the IMC getting damaged (which would cause memory instability or program crashes and frequent BSODs )? Is it the cache? There are many people on reddit that turned off cores/downclocked and BSODs go away and there are others that have tried those and what everyone guesses a damaged IMC would be a definitely dead CPU.
After all, I bought the damn CPU because I trusted intel that it would be more stable on plenty of programs than AMD aside from my need with highly threaded workloads of editing. Turns out I'm at risk of accelerated degradation without knowing if my undervolt is enough to get the CPU to last me at least 5 years of use without any headaches.
Dumb comment no one is a test subject if they know what they are doing. This is a well known fact what he is doing.
I still get 100C+ even after applying this update (0x129), is anyone else having this issue? Is this normal or am I doing something wrong? In addition, I do not see the option for "Intel Default Settings", can someone point me to where this might be? I have the 13700 non-K variant on a ASRock z690m-itx. Thanks
I missed this video, my PC exploded, house burned down. Very tragic. The dog is still missing, possibly headed to Mexico. Wife and the kids are gone, all Apple users. The cat defected to the neighbors. I should've updated :(
The priority is performance and reliability. This channel covered both well.
I expected this video months ago to be real
I have never seen my i7 13700k go above 1,360V (with CEP disabled) and i still have my first BIOS from 2022 when i bought my ASUS Prime Z790. I also have no issues with my CPU.
Everyone recommends that you set IA & SA CEP to ENABLED in BIOS, but when i do that, my VID voltages jump to 1,45V. When i leave it on DISABLED, my voltages never go above 1,360V.
Highly likely ? My PC store says it’s well less than 10% that’s not highly likely but unlikely . You tech people are scaring people with your click bait .
10% is not unlikely in risk management term😂 it is pretty close to occasional.
What matters is failures over time. It may be 10% now, but it could easily become 70-80% in a span of 5 years.
@@shenchingyeh6000It is unlikely and they dropped the microcode a couple hours ago and it is not that huge of a deal. Just like he says update BIOS and you are mostly safe just try not to overclock it
@@JFrameMan I
don’t keep a cpu more than 2 years .
They forgot to add one 0. Its not 10% but 100%. Every, again every 13th and 14th gen intel CPU is affected. Even 65W ones. If cpu is undervolted, procesy of degradation is just slower.
When I did a test in Cinebench today I got over 1.4 volts in core VIDs, core temp and cpu package temp of 100 C maximum and a result of about 38000. I noticed PL1 and PL2 were set on default. All I did was set IA VR Voltage Limit to 1400, set PL1 to 125W and PL2 to 253W as shown on Intel website for 14700k and disabled enhanced-multicore performance. Now the result is about 29500 but core VIDs voltage does not go above 1.390, and core temp and cpu package temp go up to 90 C.
the best way to prevent my cpu from dying is switching to amd😂
Not everyone wants AMD. They simply cannot complete with intel for clock speed and multi core power for the same money. Without the extra L3 cache, they would be useless. Even the new AMD 9700x cannot compete with even the i7 14700. If it wasnt for the stability issues, intel would be dominating.
Yeah sure switch your motherboard too 😉
@@tempestblaze6051 And Ram, especially if you use DDR4.
@@nathanzhu5562 These comments are so annoying… most of us already spent the money and have our PCs built. We can’t exactly go and switch to AMD so soon. No doubt AMD will be my next build, but we’re all currently stuck with Intel. Saying “switch to AMD” isn’t a solution ffs.
@@prussell890Coping much?
I've been using a 13700F for over an year now without a BIOS update - not a single issue so far, temps under load can reach 100C for short periods but only 1.2-1.3V on average.
May update BIOS once Intel release the new microcode but only after I see tests.
Same with a 13600K bought in February.
Urgent! Sell off your Intel PC now and switch to AMD before your computers value plummets!
AMD is also having some issues
😂 ok amd employee.
Sell? Who would want to buy that?
To who genius???
Sadly, nobody is going to buy it now. Even new 13 th / 14 th are selling worse than 12 th gen now.
CPU:13900k: Vid Max 1.528. Package max power: 253W. I've noticed with the new BIOS the power is maintained, where previously is still jumped to like 285W. The voltage is still very high, although under load the voltage goes down to 1.25.
I got the same degits there, so should we leave as its now or ?
I set my max to 1.5v. If you limit to 1.2 it’s not stable. The highest stable max I could achieve was 1.42. During loading it always spikes.
1.5? Are you crazy or are you crazy?
Why you need to enabled IGPU if you have a High Performance GPU?
Hello, i have a Intel Core i5 14600KF. My problem its the CPU turn to 100° on a high charge. My motherboard is ASUS tuf gaming b760m-plus wifi II, and my CPUFAN is BeQuiet! Pure Rock 2. I have the same settings than you, my CPU FAN was not good?
brute forcing a voltage limit is also a fine way of tuning, but itll ofc take some trial and error with benching for stability, nice vid! (no pun)
Asus Z790 Prime, i5 13600k, Deepcool AK620. With Intel default setting I have average values of 197W, 1.417V, 94 degrees Celsius CPU temp and 22518 points in Cinebench R23. If I use the Asus OC setting it is only 158W, 1.251V, 74 degrees Celsius but 23129 points in the R23. I will therefore stick with the Asus setting!
When testing for performance my 14900K, fixed at 1.325v temps high 80's early 90's when running Cinebench R23 with a 41K cinebench r23 multi score. For daily use, fixed vcore 1.3v and again no issues and temps even better. Also I would never lead vcore on auto. Set a fixed or adaptive with a max 1.350v limit as that will provide all the performance and more without any temprature issues whatsoever.
i updated bios to intel default and did evreything and my my max vid core voltage is 1.605 and i see you freaking out about 1.45 so what can i do ?
But the CPU isn’t drawing any amps at idle…….so voltage is not that important. Your voltage under load is 1.25. Not that bad……but still a little high.
13900k I've used for a few years on custom water. Voltages on latest bios is around 1.3v idle and 1.25 under load. The only thing I have tweaked with the latest bios is increasing my power limits since even under load my temps are under 75C.
Updated my MSI motherboard to the latest and had to go back to the previous bios. My system started running hotter so hopefully the next bios update will be better off
My 13700k was 1.25 volts. I set it to 1.35 with an offset -0.03. Great temp all core 5.4
meh... ignore the power limits, and just change the v-core voltages to say 1.35 max. U migh have to go to the LLC setting and choose a setting depening if u want the voltage to droop under load or not. on some motherboards the lowest values(1-10) droop more and on some the highest value droop more under load.
So now u are done.
yeah
had zero issues the entire time with my 13600k i got used running 5.3ghz latest bios stock volts v1.22 guess im really lucky, that said it wasnt really pushed hard yet.
I updated to the latest bios on MSI Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI for my i7-14700KF hoping it will resolve the crashing and bluescreens and unexpected shut downs. I just gave up and returned back to my MSI B550 Gaming Plus paired with AMD R9 5900x no issues at all. I just wasted a lot of money sadly on Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI and Intel CPU
i got the same issues, still not fixed
@@keno921 Hello, yes there are lot of complaints about Intel 14th Gen and 13th Gen and even 12th Gen processors. I suggest that you try to build AM4/5 desktop pc. I have a small mini pc from minisforum AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with external Dock PCIE 3.0/External PSU its running well and no issues at all. I heard there are too concerns over Intel new gen processors Ultra etc and instability issues. Stick with AMD processors AM4/AM5 builds. I am planning to buy AMD Ryzen 7 9700x (AMD new processors) soon.
I have a 13600k on a msi z690 pro p ddr4 mobo. There's a setting called cpu lite load. Have put it on mode 3 after trial and error. Now the cpu runs on 1.2v max all core load and the performance is within 1 percent of mobo default settings. Default max temp in cine bench was 95c and with mode 3 it's high 70s in cinebemch and low 70s in gaming. Using a deepcool assassin 3 for cooling. It's worth a try for those with msi mobos
I'm on Z690 DDR4 Gigabyte with a 13700K and similar issues with still high voltages being requested by the CPU with the newest BIOS. With Intel default profile I also went in to manually set PL1/PL2 to 253W, IccMax to 307A, IA VR to 1385 (1.385V) and undervolted by -75mV adaptive offset. Cinebench R23 multicore scores now at 28,200ish. With only applying the Intel defaults profile, peak CPU temps hit ~86c, with the rest of my limits applied, ~76c
I have a similar setup as you, 13700k + Gigabyte z690 gaming X DDR4. I'm still on a F21 BIOS Version though. What's your turbo power limit set to? Mine is set to Intel POR which limits the PL1/PL2 to 253W, but after testing i've noticed a huge performance loss in C R23. My multicore result went from 30167 (all bios default settings + XMP) to 17545.
Does this apply to the gaming laptop cpus? I'm not much of a tech guy
Yes it does, I have an rtx 4090 laptop with an i9-14900hx and it’s suffering stability issues really badly
I have that microcode (12b) update installed in my msi MB bios. Do I still need these settings?
I keep hearing bad things about ucode 129, so I stuck with ucode 125. I then undervolted by -.100v. It keeps my max VID and Vcore under 1.4v. It actually raised my R23 score from 35.5K to about 38.5K as well. Fingers crossed this keeps my 14900KF safe.
@theTechNotice it's important to specify that a lot of BIOS Update that contains the new microcode are marked as Beta-BIOS which means it could remove the motherboard warranty
I just installed the CPU yesterday and did Cinebench r24, i only got 1430 points in multicore and 121 in single core.
I got an Arctic liquidfreezer iii 360mm aio. Ive set up the recommended powerlimits from intel. The CPU hits nearly instantly 100°C if i start the bench, i dont understand that... Idle temps are around 60°C
Whole video is about how update bios. Nice this is what we need it. Well done.
14600K stable overclock @ 1.32V
p-cores 5300 => 5600 ghz
e-cores 4000 => 4400 ghz
limited by 80°C TJmax and 181W TDP
Last bios up my voltage to 1.65V for 6ghz.... 1.55 for 5.8Ghz, it's a now way... temp are already rather crazy.
There does appear to be random voltage issues based on which bios versions you have aswel which makes no sense. I had to revert back to aprils bios update released back then since updating to the latest one a few days back. I had all the values set to the exact same intel default settings and everything that i was using on the previous bios but was getting worse results and higher voltages and was back to crashing and bluescreening again until i reverted back to the previous bios i had. I seen reports of similar issues from others too. Hopefully the next update with a newer microcode fix will be better but i ain't holding my breath too much lmao
We have 250 Dell's with these chips in.. Zero issues. Everything was correctly setup to begin with as they got it right out of the box. I have similar at home and guess what, i setup and updated the bios correctly.
One set of chips were bad... So what, not like amd didn't do that a few years ago or all the macbook keyboards broke for four years.
Whats the difference between XMP 1, XMP 2 and XMP Tweaked?
Different voltages with different feel of gameplay. Your better off not using XMP
There is another small tweak in the bios that should be changed, i don't remember exactly how it's called but it has something to do with the cpu voltage, instead of auto change it to adaptive, in auto it will mostly stay at max voltage in idle for some reason then change when the cpu is used, but adaptive will use only what it needs when needed
probably vcore. adaptive with a negative offset is a good idea
Just put limit of 1.4 ir in cpu power management in rog asus bios
Can one do the same in an MSI motherboard?
@@LorentGuimaraes I very sure u can go to RUclips search bar and type buildzoid he has many in depth guides using msi board
Thank you for posting this. Just returned a 13th Gen i9 and got a replacement under warranty. Now I need fix the BIOS after an update failed with the faulty CPU - I could not access the BIOS after the update. I will try Q Flash plus in the Gigabyte Aero G Z790 before fitting the new Intel i9-14900K. The issue might have been the file name not being renamed to 'GIGABYTE.bin' on the USB - although every instruction suggested the rename only if updating without the CPU.