Jet6 Vane comparison 1.75 vs 2.00 vs normal Spin wings Which is better?

We test arrows made with 1.75" amd 2.00" Jet6 vanes vs the traditional Spin Wing vane. We discuss how you go about determining which one is right for you.
www.archerysho...
www.archerysho...

[@RyanAbbas]

It would be good to see how the Jet6 vanes compare to the Pandarus vanes at distances 50m+

[@Australian_Made]

👍

[@darthdradacane3340]

In my honest opinion the Pandarus vanes are terrible in wind

[@46luskbrady]

Real hard to have any conclusion from this. Should have warmed up first to make it an even test. I have shot the jet 6 1.75 and the shark for about 3 years. I find them decent if prone to creasing. They perform really well at 70m tight groups and very efficient flight

[@sahhull]

Indoors I use Easton Platinum 23xx arrows and 5inch vanes.
Outdoors.
Easton ACG and Bohning X vanes.
As long as you like what you fletch with. It really doesn't seem to make a difference.

[@mrpickles3479]

I prefer Bohning 1.75” X vanes, offset or helical, than spinners…. They’re stronger and less hassle.

[@MyFriendsAreElectric]

It's not a spinwing, but does cause a good amount of spin - try the NACA 200 vanes from gas pro.
It'd be worth seeing how they compare at distance as I'm guessing a spin wing saps a little more speed than these vanes.

[@HywelOwen]

You can shoot bare shafts indoors if you're making good shots.

[@wanr5701]

IMO 18m is too close for any vane to show the difference. Try one at 70m and we can see them.

[@ButcherBBQ]

Jimi must be on the other side of the fence.

[@hutchieboy242]

Are those LH or RH?

[@islandpainter3964]

Head out to 40 mate, things start to show up round there.

[@JuztWylde]

18m is too close.

[@LuqmanHM]

I need actual raw scores!!!!!!!! This video does not validate anything