I do feel their mice are a bit over priced, but at least they design and come out with different shapes. There are way to many company's just cloning popular shapes and profiting off of other company's hard work/RND.
@@chrisb8479 to be fair a lot of companies that are cloning actually do make the shapes you see nd love today. They just make their own 🤣 but yeah still overpriced and I’d say that for every single Gwolves mouse that comes out.
These pressing tests are the most r*ta*ded tests ever. I have over decades never flexed my mouse. Why the hell are you doing it? Thare are hundrets of parameter which are more important, and people are telling something is bad because when you squeeze it, it makes noises?
@@RyseShineReviews im sorry but hes right you didnt adress any of the actual important features in the mouse pressing the back of a leighweight mouse just to see it slightly flex means nothing.
@@mikerzisu9508 cause they didn’t check the entire length of the side of the mouse. The mouse is extremely small and right past the side button going back that’s where the flex is
I try haha I don’t want people wasting their money on something that should be tops maybe $100. I’d rather yall spend your money on like a razer viper v3 pro at this point
@@RyseShineReviews if we were to still want side buttons do you think having them positioned more forward would at least provide more stability than the current way its positioned?
@@aohjii I’d say so yeah moving your finger forward will still grant more stability than backwards. But I’d want a slightly different design for this mouse. Make it taller, so there is more room for your thumb and so you can make slightly larger side buttons.
@@RyseShineReviews I agree, I suggested on their discord server that the front of the mouse be lifted higher exactly for that reason, to have more side wall surface area for the thumb = more room to grip = more control , and there is no reason for a rear hump because its a finger tip mouse Thats why i think most fingertip users like the G Pro Superlight so much because it doesn't have rear hump based on the way you would hold it, and it has very flat and very wide side walls If only there was a mouse that took those elements to make a mouse that reduces the length of mouse but keeps that same width
I had the HSK Pro 4k and could tell it also wasn't worth the price. They include a lot of extras that probably could reduce $20. I also have a Lamzu Atlantis mini, I really like Lamzu for the quality/price ratio now. But I am excited to try this. I stuck with the HSK for a year and had a lot of fun, it got me into aim training. Just that curiosity in a real unique shape. Now my curiosity strikes again, this price isn't too steep knowing I'll truly have a fun time exploring the grip.
@@gamist8166 hey all the power to ya, trying unique shapes is why I’m still in my hunt lmao I just couldn’t see where this mouse is worth the price at all tbh that’s why made the video
@@s1ck_st3 well 1k is far more enough for me so i would never pay gor marketing that wont make any difference for my use and porformance, even in fos games that enjoy
Yeah i feel like unfortunately for the top tier niche fingertip mouse that are like super small unfortunately theyre just going to be super pricy whether if its the m2k, hsk, PMM mods etc. Ususlly they dont come as its worth at all. Only a select few of people buy them for specifically the shape and weight
Joined YT two months ago, makes a troll account, sucks off gwolves (I’m guessing) has 0 clue at all. When the mouse its tiny af and you’re limited to where you can even hold someone is gonna feel that flex. Keep spending money on shit gear 🫡
@@RyseShineReviews I mean to be fair that area isn't really meant to be gripped especially not with actual force. It's kind of the same mentality that pushing down on the top if the HSK Pro's back hump you can get it to flex with force but its more force than you would ever use and you would never be coming into contact with that part of the mouse anyways. I do understand your point though, but unfortunately if you want an ultra lightweight mouse it's going to come with some structural integrity compromises the lower the weight is. These mice are sub 30g, you're not going that low without compromise, and that low of a weight feels fantastic when fingertipping. I don't mean any hate, but I did think that part of the video was a bit silly. They absolutely shouldn't cost as much as they do though, if the Keychron M4 could do their fingertip mouse at $50 for 1k, and $70 for 4k than gwolves doesn't have an excuse charging over $110 IMO, even though I think their shapes are superior to the M4 and they achieve lower weight. As you mentioned these likely cost next to nothing to make, especially mass produced. Thanks for the review either way, not too many reviews up of this of someone who didn't like the mouse.
@@MrBayeasy yeah with everyone slapping that silly clay on it to make it better I find to be insane. And this mouse shouldn’t cost anything like it does. But the only integrity on the side that it had was the pbc. If that wasn’t holding the wall then the entire side would cave in. Idk I just don’t understand how people can suggest something that expensive when there are other options. Ya may not be as light but still sub 40g is very light lmao
@@RyseShineReviews Which I think is a smart move, more companies should use the pcb as support because it really firms up those contact areas, that is a weight saving feature I agree with. I think it mainly just comes down to shape and weight, most people understand they are buying a very niche product that has compromises and you willingly forgo some things to achieve an extreme result. Kind of like how supercars are made to essentially be death traps with how light and thin their material is just to achieve that extreme result. They won't win any safety prizes, but they sure do go zoom real good. Doesn't excuse the price though, if anything the lack of material here only further calls into question how they can justify charging that much for something that is essentially 1/2 to even 1/3 of a normal mouse. I actually like gwolves products, the hsk pro is probably my favorite mouse (tied with the Op1 8k), however I feel that they really could use an improvement in customer service and especially their pricing. These are made in China on top of that I'm pretty sure, their profit margins must be through the roof. Definitely not a customer focused business, unlike End Game Gear and all their pro consumer features they have in their mice, and all for literally half the price of gwolves flagship mice lol. Hopefully you can still enjoy the mouse for what it is, think of it like a super car and not like a Toyota lol. I'll bet you'll still be able to find some enjoyment out of it, provided you vibe with the shape.
You like mice that don’t flex at all anywhere and it’s the thing that matters the most to you ,ok. But why are you buying a mouse with a lot of holes in it then? Just buy a g502 you would be really happy with it.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I do feel their mice are a bit over priced, but at least they design and come out with different shapes. There are way to many company's just cloning popular shapes and profiting off of other company's hard work/RND.
@@chrisb8479 to be fair a lot of companies that are cloning actually do make the shapes you see nd love today. They just make their own 🤣 but yeah still overpriced and I’d say that for every single Gwolves mouse that comes out.
These pressing tests are the most r*ta*ded tests ever. I have over decades never flexed my mouse. Why the hell are you doing it? Thare are hundrets of parameter which are more important, and people are telling something is bad because when you squeeze it, it makes noises?
@@Golden2Talon these comments are the most braindead comments to ever read. 🫡 Congrats on being sucked into the brainless community 😘
@@RyseShineReviews im sorry but hes right you didnt adress any of the actual important features in the mouse pressing the back of a leighweight mouse just to see it slightly flex means nothing.
This is interesting to watch… I saw another video the other day on this mouse and his unit had pretty much no flex at all.
@@mikerzisu9508 cause they didn’t check the entire length of the side of the mouse. The mouse is extremely small and right past the side button going back that’s where the flex is
@@RyseShineReviews maybe the qc lottery?
Love the honesty man.
I try haha I don’t want people wasting their money on something that should be tops maybe $100. I’d rather yall spend your money on like a razer viper v3 pro at this point
does the angled back side buttons affect your aim when trying to press them while aiming
Yes, there should not have been any side buttons on this mouse especially since they made them so tiny haha
@@RyseShineReviews if we were to still want side buttons do you think having them positioned more forward would at least provide more stability than the current way its positioned?
@@aohjii I’d say so yeah moving your finger forward will still grant more stability than backwards. But I’d want a slightly different design for this mouse. Make it taller, so there is more room for your thumb and so you can make slightly larger side buttons.
@@RyseShineReviews I agree, I suggested on their discord server that the front of the mouse be lifted higher exactly for that reason, to have more side wall surface area for the thumb = more room to grip = more control
, and there is no reason for a rear hump because its a finger tip mouse
Thats why i think most fingertip users like the G Pro Superlight so much because it doesn't have rear hump based on the way you would hold it, and it has very flat and very wide side walls
If only there was a mouse that took those elements to make a mouse that reduces the length of mouse but keeps that same width
@@aohjii I do have the darmoshark m5 coming while it’s a different shape I’m excited to see just how it feels
I had the HSK Pro 4k and could tell it also wasn't worth the price. They include a lot of extras that probably could reduce $20. I also have a Lamzu Atlantis mini, I really like Lamzu for the quality/price ratio now. But I am excited to try this. I stuck with the HSK for a year and had a lot of fun, it got me into aim training. Just that curiosity in a real unique shape. Now my curiosity strikes again, this price isn't too steep knowing I'll truly have a fun time exploring the grip.
@@gamist8166 hey all the power to ya, trying unique shapes is why I’m still in my hunt lmao I just couldn’t see where this mouse is worth the price at all tbh that’s why made the video
love the size. but not paying 160 for it. 80 maybe
Exactly
bruh, it got an 8k sensor, in what world you can buy such high tech for 80 bucks -_-
@@s1ck_st3 well 1k is far more enough for me so i would never pay gor marketing that wont make any difference for my use and porformance, even in fos games that enjoy
@@s1ck_st3 I have like 5 other mice I got under $100 that has a 3950 and can sit at 8k perfectly fine.
@@RyseShineReviews lala land
Yeah i feel like unfortunately for the top tier niche fingertip mouse that are like super small unfortunately theyre just going to be super pricy whether if its the m2k, hsk, PMM mods etc. Ususlly they dont come as its worth at all. Only a select few of people buy them for specifically the shape and weight
Which doesn’t make sense cause a lower price can get way more people into the fingertip mouse game lmao this is just hurting them in the end
@RyseShineReviews yeah it's torturing the fanbase & usually that's not how the law of supply and demand works
@@RyseShineReviews pmm aim 8k, 20 g fingertip mouse, 273 USD 😭
@@sentinalo it’s disgusting lmao
Doing flex test on the tail end there is the dumbest shit I've ever seen. Stay in your hater bubble, it's wild.
Joined YT two months ago, makes a troll account, sucks off gwolves (I’m guessing) has 0 clue at all. When the mouse its tiny af and you’re limited to where you can even hold someone is gonna feel that flex. Keep spending money on shit gear 🫡
@@RyseShineReviews Comedy is, you just spend money on said "shit gear", here you left this 🤡
@@RyseShineReviews I mean to be fair that area isn't really meant to be gripped especially not with actual force. It's kind of the same mentality that pushing down on the top if the HSK Pro's back hump you can get it to flex with force but its more force than you would ever use and you would never be coming into contact with that part of the mouse anyways. I do understand your point though, but unfortunately if you want an ultra lightweight mouse it's going to come with some structural integrity compromises the lower the weight is. These mice are sub 30g, you're not going that low without compromise, and that low of a weight feels fantastic when fingertipping. I don't mean any hate, but I did think that part of the video was a bit silly. They absolutely shouldn't cost as much as they do though, if the Keychron M4 could do their fingertip mouse at $50 for 1k, and $70 for 4k than gwolves doesn't have an excuse charging over $110 IMO, even though I think their shapes are superior to the M4 and they achieve lower weight. As you mentioned these likely cost next to nothing to make, especially mass produced. Thanks for the review either way, not too many reviews up of this of someone who didn't like the mouse.
@@MrBayeasy yeah with everyone slapping that silly clay on it to make it better I find to be insane. And this mouse shouldn’t cost anything like it does. But the only integrity on the side that it had was the pbc. If that wasn’t holding the wall then the entire side would cave in. Idk I just don’t understand how people can suggest something that expensive when there are other options. Ya may not be as light but still sub 40g is very light lmao
@@RyseShineReviews Which I think is a smart move, more companies should use the pcb as support because it really firms up those contact areas, that is a weight saving feature I agree with. I think it mainly just comes down to shape and weight, most people understand they are buying a very niche product that has compromises and you willingly forgo some things to achieve an extreme result. Kind of like how supercars are made to essentially be death traps with how light and thin their material is just to achieve that extreme result. They won't win any safety prizes, but they sure do go zoom real good. Doesn't excuse the price though, if anything the lack of material here only further calls into question how they can justify charging that much for something that is essentially 1/2 to even 1/3 of a normal mouse. I actually like gwolves products, the hsk pro is probably my favorite mouse (tied with the Op1 8k), however I feel that they really could use an improvement in customer service and especially their pricing. These are made in China on top of that I'm pretty sure, their profit margins must be through the roof. Definitely not a customer focused business, unlike End Game Gear and all their pro consumer features they have in their mice, and all for literally half the price of gwolves flagship mice lol. Hopefully you can still enjoy the mouse for what it is, think of it like a super car and not like a Toyota lol. I'll bet you'll still be able to find some enjoyment out of it, provided you vibe with the shape.
You like mice that don’t flex at all anywhere and it’s the thing that matters the most to you ,ok. But why are you buying a mouse with a lot of holes in it then? Just buy a g502 you would be really happy with it.
You can still have holes with 0 flex🫡
@@RyseShineReviews yes but if the most important thing to you is no flex buy something made to be rock solid not light
@@Hemi790 what didn’t you understand, there’s PLENTY of lightweight mice that don’t flex🤣
atleast we got new shape for over years of copying viper and gpro shapes.... but yea its overpriced
@@kisaraUR not wrong there, but tbh I’d take a cheaper GPX 2 over this shape anyday👍🏻🤷🏼♂️