ALL RELIGIONS MAKE FALSE CLAIMS!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024
  • Full discussion here: • THE ANTISCIENCE OF GOD...
    #religion #god #debate #jesus #bible #exmuslim #islam #christian #atheist #atheism #buddha #hindu #pangburn #pangburnphilosophy
    Welcome to the Pangburn Universe, governed by the laws of good faith & helpfulness.

Комментарии • 31

  • @Pangburn
    @Pangburn  6 часов назад +2

    Full discussion here: ruclips.net/video/extbcWCnhxU/видео.html

    • @waynehilbornTSS
      @waynehilbornTSS Час назад

      I call "bullshiite:.. These liars are the ones who ass/u/me. These low IQ nutters are too stupid to grasp god or mind as external. TRUE OR FALSE (IQ test) - Every memory that males you.. YOU... can be easily accessed by Captain Kirk and Spock if they had a 1981 Delorean that could go HALF as fast as "ENTANGLEMENT SPEED" (2022 nobel prize in physics.)
      To dumb it WAY down... if you could see a mirro 10 light years away... the light youd see (if possible) would be 20 years into our perceived history.
      Atheists are not smart enough to know things like physics or common sense and reasoning...
      TRUE OR FALSE... a brain memory would be REDUNDANT in an expanded twin paradox (proven with atomic clocks) block universe.
      Did your MOMMY tell you youre a real boy.. and did you ASSéUéME she wasnt a dumbass.
      `Dying is VERY safe because every memory that makes you you is concurrent to a billion and one years from tomorrow.. and to NON-IDIOTS... external (EXTERNAL FROM BODY) memory/consciousness... would make death similar to "WAKING UP (not solipsism if a COMMON dream).
      PANGBURN is Italian for Pinocchio... you want to be a 'real boy'...
      WHAT IS YOUR EVIDENCE unsmart muggles...
      You can defeat any atheist in an debate by asking him to prove he exists outside simple solipsism.. or as I say.. a GROUP (opposite of solipsism) dream.
      HOW FAR DOES SELF PINCHING AND MOMMY WOO get ya?
      Atheists gave two ways to prove they are actual as opposed to living the dream like teh rest of us..
      1) MOMMY WOO: Thier mommies told them they are NOT inside a common dream. Feel free to post a video of your MOMMY signing a mote attesting to you or sam harris 'realness'... and I will try to pretend you guys are not ridiculous and a burden to mankind.
      2) self pinching: really really really really hard.. without waking up.. well.. that proves everythoing.. you must be a 'real boy'.
      Make a video of you self pinching REALLY hard.. and not waking up.. or have your mommy sign a note.. and I will personally be as gullible as yourselves.. and buy in0ot your 'real boy' person.. as oppose to living the dream like the rest of us saner folk...
      Oh... materialists learn from smarter mommies.. don't worry.. there is a system in play.
      WHY DO YOU PANGBURN... assume your mommy is correct when EVERY RELIGION matches a block universe memory system, easily accessible by Marty McFLy if he had the USS enterprise.
      TRUE OR FALSE (IQ test atheists fail)... Do all of your memories STILL exist?.. and is the only PERCEIVED barrier is travelling faster than the speed of light? Yadda yadda... ..
      TRUE OR FALSE SMART GUY.... Light cannot travel HALF (0.5) as fast as entanglement...
      Entanglement is instantaneous to anyone smarter than a 5 year or atheist.
      ---------------------------------------------
      Brain memory is an ASSUMPTION (true or false)... ..People shouldn't just go around contradicting nikola tesla ("i know my brain is a reciever" = N Tesla) without an inkling of proof.
      HOW DOES MEMORY/CONSCIOUSNESS WORK within a tried and true nocturnal dream (occam's razor).
      This comment is REASONABLE... to anyone who does not ASSUME he is chasing a separate dream squirrel....
      TWO mechanisms (nocturnal dream and 'physical" - notice quotes) to experience toast may be logical to a weak atheist mindset?
      But..
      Nocturnal dream toasty is the same as kitchen toast.. exactly the same. Holographic illusions we create because expectation *faith runs kaboodle) cause all quantum collapse even into the perceived past.
      Your channel is advocating a certain type of idiocy it will take mankind many generations to fully recover from... and this will invariably harm your karma in ways you may not fully grasp until its piper time.
      Instead of deleting and ignoring the truth.. why not tell me what it was about your mommy that so convinced you of reality...
      You cannot prove you are a real boy.. never could.
      IDIOT MATERIALISTS MUST INVENT (INVENT) a mythical brain memory system that they cannot seem to locate... They've even proved it is not brain central.. but NIKOLA TESLA was righy.. the brian is akin to a radio.. or remote control..
      Because you are all... ALL... as external memory DEMANDS of us.
      It is VERY conceited of humans to convince themselves that a brain needs to store anything
      BRAIN MEMORY IS REDUNDANT TO NON MORON TYPES.
      and why death is safe..
      WITHOUT mentioning a single religion.. a have vindicated each ands all.. using SMARTER SCIENCE THAN ATHEISTS CAN GRASP... Einsteins special theory of relativity is 120 years old.. read the thing.
      It is your path pangburn.. rethink grade school perhaps.. literally for your immortal soul (linear personified memory)
      Daniel Dennett is smarter today and he now knows he dedicate this incarnation to the illusion of materialism (earth/gaia)
      Use what this comment says to PERSONALLY defeat morons like harris or dillahunty..
      or do respect their mommies even greater than your own?
      Use logic and reason.. but be a sheep at your own peril.
      Anyone smarter than an atheist should grasp your memories are forever (einstein) acible by captain kirk and spock.. and that these moments truly exist NOW.. per se.
      Yet YOU feel.. based upon your mommy.. that memory is INTERNAL.. cough cough twit cough.
      Wake up pangburn.. or your next mommy may not be as wonderful.. but at least more clever.
      I have a channel , atheism must fall because it is not a compatible system .
      Atheism is tooted in idiocy.. a first time human thingy.. let me guess.. you have lots of chest hair also..
      Now... look at your video title here.. and tell me why it is YOU who is making all the false claims..
      Afterlife is akin to waking up.. but karma is legit and you scare countless old ladies with your one sided biased lies... good luck with that in the grand scheme.
      Some atheism is rooted in inbreeding.. they are not yet evolved enough

  • @ReflectiveRealm7
    @ReflectiveRealm7 6 часов назад +9

    Remember, whenever you feel overwhelmed by religious thoughts, take a moment to critically reflect and engage your rational mind.

  • @Robert-yc9ql
    @Robert-yc9ql 3 часа назад +3

    Statements made without evidence are dismissed without evidence.
    It is the hope and promise of seeing lost family that hooks most believers.
    Hoodwinked into a system that has no proof...

  • @MG-ot2yr
    @MG-ot2yr 5 часов назад +4

    Just imagine if the god of the Bible were real, it would mean he stayed hidden and silent for 10s of thousands of years while man worshiped a variety of false sky gods. Then, rather late in human history, he decides to show up in a pool over over 200 more false gods in the Canaanite pantheon. Then he decides to branch off and form his own pantheon of gods, with himself as the chief god, and gets a wife Asherah. Then he decides to totally go it on his own, and in a fit of jealous rage, he tries to cancel the other gods, including his wife....and makes a commandment that you can't worship them. Then he has a son who he sends to earth on a mission to unalive himself to save people from his father's creation failures.

  • @mryorkshire3623
    @mryorkshire3623 4 часа назад +6

    To believe in a god is beyond stupid. In fact the stupidity is off the scale. It's just bonkers. I hope i have made myself clear. Please stop the word salad that always seems to fill these discussions.

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited 5 часов назад +4

    Professor Krauss, is that a deck of cards, Bicycle playing cards? Maybe we'll have to play at some point. Of course, he wins this argument hands down. Or should i say, Gin. Peace ✌️ 😎.

  • @henriquesmith8376
    @henriquesmith8376 3 часа назад +1

    Nice sense of fashion by Dr Krauss 😊💜

  • @prestonbacchus4204
    @prestonbacchus4204 3 часа назад

    Here is a comment that is a little different.^
    A guy wants to make a book on morality but he is not religious so he compiles a selection of Aesop stories that feature moral lessons. So we are talking about animals living in their natural habitat and engaged in a pantomime of human behavior chatting away, based on real human stories, but in disguise. Since there are no talking animals the author assumes the mature reader will understand the metaphorical nature of the material, although the illusion of talking animals and other improbable behavior is entertaining for the kids (even though some of the animals do bad things like eating each other). Are the stories true? Not literally. Still, some people step up and say, I am without belief in Aesop, and hey, you can't fool me, animals do not talk. Well, that's true, but does that mean they are "not true"?
    Now compare his book to the Bible. It too is a book that provides scenarios that purport to teach moral lessons and features metaphorical talking animals and a host of other impossible or improbable events. Both authors assume that the mature reader will understand, at least eventually, that animals do not really talk and that the stories are intended allegory and metaphor mean't to cause thinking about the moral lessons. The Bible also provides an "historical narrative" in metaphorical form. To understand the story, the metaphors have to be deciphered. So is the Bible true? Not literally. It's a religious group's teaching aide, a primer on morality. Neither the Aesop book or the Bible are suggesting anything that is physically impossible or improbable. Those are just metaphors. So for example, Peter did not whip out a literal sword and slice off a man's ear without consequence, rather, he whipped out a metaphorical sword of righteousness (or truth) and, instead of "biting his ear off", a similar metaphor, gave him a strong "piece of his mind", judging the man by the law. In the story, Jesus realized the man was just a servant of the high priest and was himself not responsible, so, even though the man had come to arrest him, Jesus spoke comforting words to him, forgave him, "healed" the ear that Peter had "bloodied".. Get it? Every one of these impossible or improbable stories is like that. A metaphor waiting to be solved reasonably.

  • @redmed10
    @redmed10 6 часов назад +6

    This guy whoever he is may not be as irritating as peterson on Christianity but he's equally as vague.

    • @Balstrome1
      @Balstrome1 5 часов назад +1

      They have to be, because they have nothing else to offer.
      I have a pizza. You doubt me? I will describe exactly what a pizza is and I will come to your house and show you a pizza based on my description. And you will believe that I have a pizza.

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 Час назад

      Peterson is vague on Christianity because his wife is one, my guess.

  • @abbaskoko204
    @abbaskoko204 3 часа назад

    so you are telling no one ever cried when saying goodbye to a person who is going on a long journey even if they know when they will return ?!!
    and the point of the virgin birth or the one night journey to Jerusalem and to the seventh heaven and beyond and then back , is that they are miraculous .

  • @kennethmckenzie294
    @kennethmckenzie294 34 минуты назад

    The whole Jesus tale is plagiarism from Horus, possibly even before that, but it's certainly a rip-off from a fable a long time before Jesus was even invented by man!....

  • @sunyata4974
    @sunyata4974 2 часа назад

    They have both made a category mistake. Science and religion are dealing with the same fundamental substance of the universe. They have the same laws which can be derived logically. They complement each other. They claim all come from one source, multiplicity in the material world is an illusion, and this substance is not created or destroyed. Don't get hung up on the mythological explanation and lost the plot.

    • @youtubestudiosucks978
      @youtubestudiosucks978 Час назад

      I think you should lay-off the acid because your brains seems deepfried with the sewage you just spitted out of your mouth

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 Час назад +1

      Not once in human history has relegion ever complimented science or even helped science one bit.

  • @piehound
    @piehound 4 часа назад

    (1) All politicians make false claims. (2) All businesses make false claims. (3) All scientists make false claims. (4) All humans make false claims.

    • @fibonacimike4110
      @fibonacimike4110 4 часа назад +1

      @@piehound 1) when a politician makes false claims then i have good reason to not trust that politcian 2) when a business makes false claims then i have good reason to not trust that business 3) when a scientist makes false claims then i have no good reason to trust the scientist 4) when a human makes false claims i have good reason to not believe that human. 5) when religion makes false claims then i have good reason to not trust religion

    • @chronogamer7901
      @chronogamer7901 Час назад

      Religion claims to be the infallible word of God. Rational humans don't make that claim about themselves. A scientist can be wrong about something an still be right about other things, and learn with new information. Religion can't really do that.

    • @piehound
      @piehound Час назад

      @@fibonacimike4110 I never said you should trust any particular religion. On the contrary each of us needs to do his own spiritual homework. And many fall into laziness. That is they expect some clergy to do the work for them. And when that priest, rabbi, or minister is wrong . . . the seeker throws up his hands and says . . . SEE ????? I TOLD YOU IT'S ALL BALONEY.

    • @fibonacimike4110
      @fibonacimike4110 Час назад

      @@piehound no when they read what the scripture says and notices it is wrong is when they say the scripture is wrong

    • @piehound
      @piehound Час назад

      @@chronogamer7901 You're throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Your choice. Knowledge doesn't enter your head by putting a book under your pillow and sleeping on it. Ya gotta open the book. Read. And show some interest.

  • @patrickl6932
    @patrickl6932 4 часа назад

    Red shoes