This is one of the best things that i have discovered. I am 67 yrs old. High school drop-out. Watching this and other's like this has fired my imagination and given me something useful. I try to take notes and understand. Sometimes i have to re-play footage because i really want to understand. Thank you for this gift.
Black History: Of the 12.5 million slaves taken from West Africa, 80% were sold to whites by Africans!! Black lives didn't seem to matter much to them!
@@LaunchPadAstronomy I just found the channel tonight. And I seriously doubt it. I, for myself, do not think that the content of this channel can be rated even in an astronomical scale (pun intended). Thank you so much for making these videos. They make a very nice watch after programming all day. And I also get to learn new things!! Oh and also you got a new sub. I wish I could sub multiple times ;)
Black History: Of the 12.5 million slaves taken from West Africa, 80% were sold to whites by Africans!! Black lives didn't seem to matter much to them!
🔴 WHOOPS! At 7:55 I quote the temperature as 15 million Kelvin, but write it as 1.5 × 10^6 (1.5 million) K . That should be written as 1.5 × 10^7 K. My bad. 🔴 Learn more about stars: ruclips.net/video/sQeopdIfPMQ/видео.html
Black History: Of the 12.5 million slaves taken from West Africa, 80% were sold to whites by Africans!! Black lives didn't seem to matter much to them!
Awesome video! I so needed to see this video. I spend most of my time looking at black hole videos and the like, without knowing how stars are classified etc. This explains it great. I also love the section about the huge impact of women on astronomy. I love it! Love this channel. :)
WNh stars like R136a1 are interesting in that weirdly enough they are fully convective largely due to being supported against their Eddington luminosity (the luminosity where the radiative pressure exceeds that of gravity ripping a star apart) by a torque meaning they burn through all their hydrogen not blown off in to space but constantly lose angular momentum what is mind bending about it is R136a1 is about 40% hydrogen meaning it has burned over half its hydrogen fuel supply. And yes its still burning hydrogen at its core and thus in effect it is a "main sequence star". Its weird spectral type comes from its convective properties mixing core burning products up to the surface and thus it has way more helium than a typical star and was origionally classified as a Wolf-Rayet star W type stars are either WN, WC or WO depending on whether they have dominant Nitrogen Carbon or Oxygen lines and have been split into the traditional Wolf-Rayet stars which are massive evolved stars that have blown away their outer hydrogen envelopes becoming hydrogen deficient and the Wxh stars which still have significant amounts of hydrogen and are really the absurd peak of the main sequence. The fate of stars like this are unknown observationally as they are just too rare but in theory these giants likely go out in a wimper or a blip as by the end of their lives they have next to no angular momentum left and an iron core way to massive (around 50 Msun) to form anything other than a black hole but thanks to the high mass loss not massive enough to produce a pair instability supernovae (64+Msun iron core). The uncertainty lies primarily in whether the supernovae shockwave of a star like this is able to escape or not making the difference between an unusually dim supernovae(gravitationally red shifted) or the star just blinking out of existence behind an event horizon. Also fun fact apparently 99% of R136a1's radiation is well outside the visible limit with a spectral peak of around 50 nanometers in the extreme ultraviolet which is just absurd in the awesome sort of way.
g`day christian thanks for the great video and congratulations on the sponsor good to see you have some time to make some videos again i have been missing yours and tony's content for the last few months good to see you back cheers james D
Thanks James I really appreciate it. It's been a much crazier summer than I planned for but I'm making myself get back on track. There's a LOT more to come.
Hey Christian, great channel man, I found you on the The RUclips Creators Hub podcast. Have you ever considered throwing some background music onto your videos? I think you have a great voice but maybe some light mood music would enhance it a bit! Great channel man keep it up.
Thanks! I did some videos with music before but I always struggled to find fit so I kind of gave up. But then some people said they liked it better without music, while others preferred music. Not sure if I'll reintroduce it again though it can be nice to have.
Great work! May I suggest a part 2 on how stars work and evolve and go more in-depth in detail, discussing tritium and deuterium in the fusion process. Perhaps touch more on SUBJECTS such as, helioseismology and heliophysics of stars this would be STELLAR❣️😎👍
Question about the HR diagram -- for stars on the main sequence, there's a more-or-less universal relationship between mass, temperature, and radius; but if it was really universal, the main sequence would be a very narrow line on the diagram, so why is it not?
Great video....thank you....my favourite astronomer....sir, how about you do a video updating us on what scientists are doing about interstellar travel, means of propulsion, and a possible timeline in which a probe could be sent to alpha centurai. Also a video on the feasibility of warp drive will be appreciated. Thank you sir.
Your opening had that song "Woodstock" running through my head. One of these nights I'm going to set up a time lapse like that! "Vega is a lot hotter..." That's probably because of the poorly-built carburetor and sticky throttle linkage Chevy used causing over-fueling. Welcome to my ADHD 🙃
0:51 - Not only are there more stars in the observable universe than there are grains of sand on all of Earth's beaches, but there are also more stars in the observable universe than there are grains sand on all of Earth's deserts.
Great video! One (may be) question though: How do you separate the spectrum of a single star among the cluster of stars? When we see the stars using a telescope, you may see a lot of them together. Then how to find out which spectral lines belong to which star?
A star's composition is a useful tool for calculating stellar age. Since the sun is constantly fusing Hydrogen into Helium, we can approximate its age by looking at the ratio of Hydrogen to Helium in the sun. In short, as the sun ages, it will be composed of more Helium and less Hydrogen
This is such a cool video. But could you please share the source of that "Hertzsprung-Russel Diagramm"? I really want to edit it a bit and make it more pretty and the produce a few high quality posters for me, friends and family. Thank you for making this video
So this means that Harry Connick Jr. is a Type O star! Woot! I've always thought he was HOT! 😁 I seem to always need a dictionary handy when watching your videos lol...Great stuff as always, thanks Christian!
okay so now we have a yellow star? Other videos explain that the Sun is a white star, only the Earths atmosphere causing it to appear yellow from the ground. Why is there so much discretion on this? p.s. I really enjoy these videos. Making me question previous conceptions is good. Thanks Launchpad.
Believe it or not, the Sun radiates most of its energy in the middle of the visible spectrum - which is green! But it also puts out so much in the rest of the vis. spectrum our brains just turn it all white. But the images of the Sun I used were taken in yellow filters to bring out surface details.
Hi Christian Do you think that it might be possible that we may discover a new way of communicating without radio transmission and jump to the next level in Quantum communications, a Quantum leap. If so this may also be the reason that we don’t see other intelligent civilizations in the universe as they don’t use radio transmission for their communications anymore as the technology is only fleeting in their civilization’s evolution in the expanse of space and time and the age of the universe. It may be that it is only used briefly like fossil fuels and Cfc’s until a new method is found. SETI may be searching for something that is not there as like the stone age it’s old technology. Love the show
The idea "they" are using non-radio communication has been one answer to the Fermi Paradox for some time now. I'd say it's not impossible, though I'm not convinced quantum tunneling is the mechanism.
@@LaunchPadAstronomy Shouldn't we be able to see mega structures based on the light received from other stars though? We can tell if other stars have planets around them from observation, we would be able to tell if something unnaturally shaped was in the solar system as long as it passed by the telescopes sight. But we do not see this. Alien life should be much more common.
when you were on house arrest and got hepc from a roomate of your mom, used to living with the father, and making facebook to doing something nobodys ever done, all bc ofna needle and thread orrigonally..wasnt it or
Flux is the amount of energy radiating through a given area every second. Mathematically it's F = σT^4, where σ (sigma) is just a number. I probably could have explained this better in the video.
Here is what confuses me and maybe it shouldn't. Our star is as close to the central point of the H-R diagram and everything is measured in relation to that as a ratio. Now is that pure chance? Or is the H-R diagram only possible to have conceptualized because of that fact and an exotic science would (ie an observer around another star) have to formulate another classification system to understand stelar relations? If your star was Proxima Centauri and you were trying to figure this all out using similar deductive processes, would the diagram look the same, but the labels that are comparative ratios just be the difference? If a different chart would have to be formed to make sense of the chaos, I wonder what effect that would have on the scientific frames that would result?
There's nothing special about our sun and the HR diagram. All stars' luminosities in the HR diagram are normalized to the luminosity of our sun simply for convenience, and nothing more than that. It just gives us a good point of comparison with other stars since we are all familiar with our star. And yes, the HR diagram would look basically the same if it were normalized to another star woth a different temp & luminosity. Its axis would be shifted (so that version of the HR diagram would simply be shifted left / right, or up / down), but its shape would still be the same.
Big bang theory question - big bang happened and creates 10 to power of 21 , sextrillion stars ! and all this was compressed into a dense thing the size of a marble ? The scale and size is beyond human comprehension, any other believable theory which can explain this?
The conditions at the Big Bang would have been too hot for matter to form. Instead it was pure energy which cooled just enough to form the first elementary particles. The first stars didn't form until around 300,000 years later. Hope that helps!
I don't know why it bothers me so much when people say "the universe" instead of "the observable universe." I know exactly what the presenter meant. I think just about everyone knows it's just shorthand. But it still drives me bonkers. Maybe because I feel like it's somewhat limiting, suggesting that our presumably tiny little 46 billion light year radius bubble is all that there is.
Well, all we can say for sure is this is how stars work in the observable universe. Whether or not it truly works everywhere beyond is speculative at best :)
We can surmise that the standard solar gas model is incorrect because we cannot reproduce and test it. To do so would involve violating too many laws of thermodynamics, meaning either those laws are incorrect or the standard solar model is incorrect. However, the SAFIRE Project has electrically satisfied ALL solar observed requirements. Finally, the "elegance" between luminosity, radius and temperature is problematic, since it violates the 4th law of thermodynamics. Yes, the 4th law.
This is one of the best things that i have discovered. I am 67 yrs old. High school drop-out. Watching this and other's like this has fired my imagination and given me something useful. I try to take notes and understand. Sometimes i have to re-play footage because i really want to understand. Thank you for this gift.
Wow, I don't know what to say except Thank You so much for those kind words! I'm glad you're enjoying the content and getting so much out of it.
It's heartening to hear that there are people who still yearn for knowledge at all stages of life.
Black History: Of the 12.5 million slaves taken from West Africa, 80% were sold to whites by Africans!! Black lives didn't seem to matter much to them!
By far, this is the most underrated channel of the whole web.
Thank you for another great video.
Thank you so much Greyson, I’m flattered. Maybe someday I’ll become an overrated channel ;)
@@LaunchPadAstronomy I just found the channel tonight. And I seriously doubt it. I, for myself, do not think that the content of this channel can be rated even in an astronomical scale (pun intended). Thank you so much for making these videos. They make a very nice watch after programming all day. And I also get to learn new things!!
Oh and also you got a new sub. I wish I could sub multiple times ;)
Black History: Of the 12.5 million slaves taken from West Africa, 80% were sold to whites by Africans!! Black lives didn't seem to matter much to them!
It is no small thing that the writing on these videos is always excellent.
Thank you very kindly:)
🔴 WHOOPS! At 7:55 I quote the temperature as 15 million Kelvin, but write it as 1.5 × 10^6 (1.5 million) K . That should be written as 1.5 × 10^7 K. My bad.
🔴 Learn more about stars: ruclips.net/video/sQeopdIfPMQ/видео.html
You made it so easy to understand. A huge help in class. Thank you so much!!! Can't wait to watch your other videos!! :)
Happy to hear that, I'm glad it helped!
Honestly this is probably the most comprehensive yet concise and easy to understand summary of stellar mechanics I’ve seen. Very well done!
Wow, thanks so much!
Best video on stellar evolution and general star stuff
Black History: Of the 12.5 million slaves taken from West Africa, 80% were sold to whites by Africans!! Black lives didn't seem to matter much to them!
wonderful, thank you so much for doing these
Error in sun's temperature shown at 7:57 . It should be 15,000,000 K and read 1.5x10⁷, instead of 1.5x10⁶.
You should have millions of subs,...seriously!
Awesome and so so informative! Thanks so much!!
your videos are true high quality mini-lessons, Christian -- very clear, well explained. thanks again for your great resource!
Thank you so kindly, Victor. I really do appreciate it!
Awesome video! I so needed to see this video. I spend most of my time looking at black hole videos and the like, without knowing how stars are classified etc. This explains it great. I also love the section about the huge impact of women on astronomy. I love it! Love this channel. :)
Thank you so much, I truly appreciate it!
👍🏻I’ve never watched better videos than Christian’s!
Thank you so much!
WNh stars like R136a1 are interesting in that weirdly enough they are fully convective largely due to being supported against their Eddington luminosity (the luminosity where the radiative pressure exceeds that of gravity ripping a star apart) by a torque meaning they burn through all their hydrogen not blown off in to space but constantly lose angular momentum what is mind bending about it is R136a1 is about 40% hydrogen meaning it has burned over half its hydrogen fuel supply. And yes its still burning hydrogen at its core and thus in effect it is a "main sequence star". Its weird spectral type comes from its convective properties mixing core burning products up to the surface and thus it has way more helium than a typical star and was origionally classified as a Wolf-Rayet star W type stars are either WN, WC or WO depending on whether they have dominant Nitrogen Carbon or Oxygen lines and have been split into the traditional Wolf-Rayet stars which are massive evolved stars that have blown away their outer hydrogen envelopes becoming hydrogen deficient and the Wxh stars which still have significant amounts of hydrogen and are really the absurd peak of the main sequence. The fate of stars like this are unknown observationally as they are just too rare but in theory these giants likely go out in a wimper or a blip as by the end of their lives they have next to no angular momentum left and an iron core way to massive (around 50 Msun) to form anything other than a black hole but thanks to the high mass loss not massive enough to produce a pair instability supernovae (64+Msun iron core). The uncertainty lies primarily in whether the supernovae shockwave of a star like this is able to escape or not making the difference between an unusually dim supernovae(gravitationally red shifted) or the star just blinking out of existence behind an event horizon.
Also fun fact apparently 99% of R136a1's radiation is well outside the visible limit with a spectral peak of around 50 nanometers in the extreme ultraviolet which is just absurd in the awesome sort of way.
Well done Christian, hope your students appreciate you, They should!
Thanks John, I tried making the video for both my students and the general public. Hope they enjoy it!
Really nice introduction to stars. It's such a great topic. Looking forward to the next installment.
Thanks man!
Thanks for sharing another great video . It is always a pleasure to know more about the universe.
I am staying curious!
Thanks Joe!
You're a star 🌟
This friendly neigborhood astronomer ist great. Thank you for your clips on youtube.
g`day christian thanks for the great video and congratulations on the sponsor good to see you have some time to make some videos again i have been missing yours and tony's content for the last few months good to see you back
cheers
james D
Thanks James I really appreciate it. It's been a much crazier summer than I planned for but I'm making myself get back on track. There's a LOT more to come.
Nice video man keep up the good work
Great summary, reminds me of my stellar evolution class in college, with mostly grad students!
Thanks! It's a bit distilled from the grad-level but I'm glad you liked it :)
You are a great teacher!
Wow, thank you!
Finally, an explanation I can understand, thank you 👍
Awesome video. Thank you.
Glad you liked it!
Hey Christian, great channel man, I found you on the The RUclips Creators Hub podcast. Have you ever considered throwing some background music onto your videos? I think you have a great voice but maybe some light mood music would enhance it a bit! Great channel man keep it up.
Thanks! I did some videos with music before but I always struggled to find fit so I kind of gave up. But then some people said they liked it better without music, while others preferred music. Not sure if I'll reintroduce it again though it can be nice to have.
Thank you for another excellent video.
Thanks Dan, I appreciate it. It’s been a busy summer and I miss making videos so I’m glad to get back to it.
Great work! May I suggest a part 2 on how stars work and evolve and go more in-depth in detail, discussing tritium and deuterium in the fusion process. Perhaps touch more on SUBJECTS such as, helioseismology and heliophysics of stars this would be STELLAR❣️😎👍
Most of the stars 🌟 were laid off and are no longer working! 😳
Question about the HR diagram -- for stars on the main sequence, there's a more-or-less universal relationship between mass, temperature, and radius; but if it was really universal, the main sequence would be a very narrow line on the diagram, so why is it not?
Yes, very nice summary!
Thanks Don!
Great video....thank you....my favourite astronomer....sir, how about you do a video updating us on what scientists are doing about interstellar travel, means of propulsion, and a possible timeline in which a probe could be sent to alpha centurai. Also a video on the feasibility of warp drive will be appreciated. Thank you sir.
Thanks for the suggestions, Sunday!
Your opening had that song "Woodstock" running through my head.
One of these nights I'm going to set up a time lapse like that!
"Vega is a lot hotter..." That's probably because of the poorly-built carburetor and sticky throttle linkage Chevy used causing over-fueling.
Welcome to my ADHD 🙃
"We are stardust...billion year old carbon."
Dude I’ve been studying the Centauri system for a while now- Proxima Centauri is so goddamn fun to say.
It's a cool sounding name :)
I love that Star graph!
Diagram**
Yeah me too. It's the key to understanding stars!
0:51 - Not only are there more stars in the observable universe than there are grains of sand on all of Earth's beaches, but there are also more stars in the observable universe than there are grains sand on all of Earth's deserts.
big star's are like Rock stars, they live fast and die young
Great video! One (may be) question though: How do you separate the spectrum of a single star among the cluster of stars? When we see the stars using a telescope, you may see a lot of them together. Then how to find out which spectral lines belong to which star?
Wonderful channel, fantastic Host!
Professor ,how do we know how old our star is ?
A star's composition is a useful tool for calculating stellar age. Since the sun is constantly fusing Hydrogen into Helium, we can approximate its age by looking at the ratio of Hydrogen to Helium in the sun. In short, as the sun ages, it will be composed of more Helium and less Hydrogen
This is such a cool video. But could you please share the source of that "Hertzsprung-Russel Diagramm"? I really want to edit it a bit and make it more pretty and the produce a few high quality posters for me, friends and family.
Thank you for making this video
Sorry, I am still stuck at 0:52 ... Are there only 5 Billion Galaxies in the (Observable) Universe?
More like on the order of 100 billion galaxies.
@@LaunchPadAstronomy And how many stars on average a galaxy has?
@@AstroRamiEmad 100-200 billion!
@@arnavjain7566 The numbers don't seem to add up with me ... I mean there are 3 orders of magnitude difference.
So this means that Harry Connick Jr. is a Type O star! Woot! I've always thought he was HOT! 😁 I seem to always need a dictionary handy when watching your videos lol...Great stuff as always, thanks Christian!
Dammit, Patti I'm an astronomer not a physician. I have no idea what Connick's blood type is.! ;)
@@LaunchPadAstronomy 😆
okay so now we have a yellow star? Other videos explain that the Sun is a white star, only the Earths atmosphere causing it to appear yellow from the ground. Why is there so much discretion on this?
p.s. I really enjoy these videos. Making me question previous conceptions is good. Thanks Launchpad.
Believe it or not, the Sun radiates most of its energy in the middle of the visible spectrum - which is green! But it also puts out so much in the rest of the vis. spectrum our brains just turn it all white. But the images of the Sun I used were taken in yellow filters to bring out surface details.
Stars are like big light bulbs in the universe.
A painting of a Dark Star on the shelf
Finally a channel where the material hasn't been reduced to moron level. Thank you!
after yahoo, which site isnt yours
@launch pad astronomy What happens to the leftover electrons before positive hydrogen nuclei collide to generate helium and energy?
The temperatures in the core are so high everything is ionized. The nuclei fuse in a "sea" of free electrons.
Its SAD that the Nobel prize isnt awarded POSTHUMOUSLY ❤😊
I picked up a new one.
Only Bad Astronomers Forget Generally Known Mnemonics (Lost They Yield)
Thk
Cheers
electric repulsion would be a rad band name lol
sonwas the kindle fore your spirit
Stars are Gods fairy lights. Though I don't envy the task of rewiring them when a bulb goes.
lol!
Hi Christian Do you think that it might be possible that we may discover a new way of communicating without radio transmission and jump to the next level in Quantum communications, a Quantum leap. If so this may also be the reason that we don’t see other intelligent civilizations in the universe as they don’t use radio transmission for their communications anymore as the technology is only fleeting in their civilization’s evolution in the expanse of space and time and the age of the universe. It may be that it is only used briefly like fossil fuels and Cfc’s until a new method is found. SETI may be searching for something that is not there as like the stone age it’s old technology. Love the show
The idea "they" are using non-radio communication has been one answer to the Fermi Paradox for some time now. I'd say it's not impossible, though I'm not convinced quantum tunneling is the mechanism.
@@LaunchPadAstronomy Shouldn't we be able to see mega structures based on the light received from other stars though? We can tell if other stars have planets around them from observation, we would be able to tell if something unnaturally shaped was in the solar system as long as it passed by the telescopes sight. But we do not see this. Alien life should be much more common.
Did Annie Jump Cannon write the first algorithm for astronomy?
they pushed me off a triple slide and i fell down the 100 ft hill new stident
In (most of) Europe 10^21 is 1 trilliard
ship at windows enters tv watching it later on
last actually first one was
wore the rim bc they took your first fb idea on facebook.
chair no distraction
costed me myjaw
youll have brick wall ideas but when she gets mad if your at one not playing it waiting to play poker while there brick wall is much worse
Olinto De Pretto came up with E=mc2 in 1903, and not the plagiarist, Albert Kikestein.
I thought they were all horizontal or on their knees
live address had 1 million views when he signed up and clicked a tabdissapeared
when you were on house arrest and got hepc from a roomate of your mom, used to living with the father, and making facebook to doing something nobodys ever done, all bc ofna needle and thread orrigonally..wasnt it or
How annoying. I thought it was how stairs work.
#1/#2
jumped by a wanted man already..how to not know
and a counter was already bad
I think you mean the sun is 1 solar mass**
Hahaha jk
How tobe from the bronx and tell a bronx story
The universe must be full full to the power of full of life.
Sorry but you have Hydrogen and Helium with the same spectrum absorption lines.
Like what's the flux?
Flux is the amount of energy radiating through a given area every second. Mathematically it's F = σT^4, where σ (sigma) is just a number. I probably could have explained this better in the video.
@@LaunchPadAstronomy I was actually making a joke but your explanation definitely taught me more than I already knew!!! Thanks!!
Stars a distractor?
#3
Here is what confuses me and maybe it shouldn't. Our star is as close to the central point of the H-R diagram and everything is measured in relation to that as a ratio. Now is that pure chance? Or is the H-R diagram only possible to have conceptualized because of that fact and an exotic science would (ie an observer around another star) have to formulate another classification system to understand stelar relations? If your star was Proxima Centauri and you were trying to figure this all out using similar deductive processes, would the diagram look the same, but the labels that are comparative ratios just be the difference? If a different chart would have to be formed to make sense of the chaos, I wonder what effect that would have on the scientific frames that would result?
There's nothing special about our sun and the HR diagram. All stars' luminosities in the HR diagram are normalized to the luminosity of our sun simply for convenience, and nothing more than that.
It just gives us a good point of comparison with other stars since we are all familiar with our star.
And yes, the HR diagram would look basically the same if it were normalized to another star woth a different temp & luminosity. Its axis would be shifted (so that version of the HR diagram would simply be shifted left / right, or up / down), but its shape would still be the same.
@@beta_cygni1950 Thank you for this. Cheers :)
Big bang theory question - big bang happened and creates 10 to power of 21 , sextrillion stars ! and all this was compressed into a dense thing the size of a marble ? The scale and size is beyond human comprehension, any other believable theory which can explain this?
The conditions at the Big Bang would have been too hot for matter to form. Instead it was pure energy which cooled just enough to form the first elementary particles. The first stars didn't form until around 300,000 years later. Hope that helps!
share
shoulda got back of head
bc he loses . i didnt tell him boutpopcorn
Numerous adds and sponsors
paftb
If just one of these formulae is wrong, all crumbles down.
illegalr sweaters hurt illegal hoodies
I don't know why it bothers me so much when people say "the universe" instead of "the observable universe."
I know exactly what the presenter meant. I think just about everyone knows it's just shorthand.
But it still drives me bonkers. Maybe because I feel like it's somewhat limiting, suggesting that our presumably tiny little 46 billion light year radius bubble is all that there is.
Well, all we can say for sure is this is how stars work in the observable universe. Whether or not it truly works everywhere beyond is speculative at best :)
force to baby sit is fine although i guess you donthave to be the creator of youtube maybe just facenook..popcorn ceiling
o be a fine trans non binary fluid pregnant manequin . great vid btw
I wish our sun was a hotter star
Like blazing Sirius or Rigel
Put everbody in my PRISON just to make sure.?
no medical help
We can surmise that the standard solar gas model is incorrect because we cannot reproduce and test it. To do so would involve violating too many laws of thermodynamics, meaning either those laws are incorrect or the standard solar model is incorrect. However, the SAFIRE Project has electrically satisfied ALL solar observed requirements. Finally, the "elegance" between luminosity, radius and temperature is problematic, since it violates the 4th law of thermodynamics. Yes, the 4th law.
24 hour nickel crew
Kilometers but you don't give the distance in miles as well. Where's your common sense? Rank amateur.
Million kilometers away? You lied at the start. Earth is 94 million miles away. Nearest star is trillions. Just delete this and retry
150 million kilometers away. Have another listen.
@@LaunchPadAstronomy yes and I'm sorry. You were correct. 😊
Wish they wouldn't use the European measurements. Only American system.
I wished we used metric. It’s much easier.
One of the most didactic and least pretentious amazing channels on RUclips