Judith Butler is so wrong in claiming that all gendered behaviour is just a social invention and arbitrary. One example is same-sex intimacy and the way men and women relate to bodies. Women are not afraid of intimacy of any kind yet men are said to have been trained by "society" to be emotionally detached. Have you ever thought that maybe the erection in men has something to do with the way they relate to their body and the bodies of others? People like Butler, who don't know how to think, always blame society, whoever that is, for everything. The men that wrote the Bible condemned homosexuality not because God told them but because making homosexuality a sin was the only way to deal with the shame they felt about same-sex intimacy.
Judith Butler is so wrong in claiming that all gendered behaviour is just a social invention and arbitrary. One example is same-sex intimacy and the way men and women relate to bodies.
Women are not afraid of intimacy of any kind yet men are said to have been trained by "society" to be emotionally detached. Have you ever thought that maybe the erection in men has something to do with the way they relate to their body and the bodies of others?
People like Butler, who don't know how to think, always blame society, whoever that is, for everything. The men that wrote the Bible condemned homosexuality not because God told them but because making homosexuality a sin was the only way to deal with the shame they felt about same-sex intimacy.