Introduction Cold War Soviet Tanks。Please follow my channel and let me know your preferences！Many thanks！This vedio is in need of some care and attention and may contain errors or inaccuracies. If you spot anything out of place, please let me know!
The T-54 and T-55 are the world’s most prolific mbts.They crushed Budapest in 56,stared down American tanks in Berlin in 61,fought in the 67,and 73 wars.Fought in the Vietnam war.Crushed Prague in 68,
There is much more,the T-54/55 has fought in wars in Africa,of course it was a T-54 that crashed through the gates of South Vietnam’s presidential palace in 1975.Hussein had thousands of T-55s,including Polish models with more oval shaped turrets,that fought Iran,and then confronted a 30 some country coalition led by a superpower in 1991.
The T-54/55 is the AK-47 of tanks,and the fact that the 54/55 was still considered a Main Battle Tank of the Warsaw Pact in the 1980s,is absolutely remarkable.
@@Fesko-ly1wr first prototypes of T-44 and T-54 were build even at the end of WWII, before september 1 of 1945. Also there should be mentioned T-80BV - reactive armored T-80B, T-55AMV and T-62MV (both with explosive reactive armor), T-10 with T-10A or T-10M and it's early model called IS-8. As for tanks, there were extensive modernisation of IS-2 and T-34-85 in Cold-War Era. Oh, and there must be T-72AV (T-72A with reactive armor), T-72B mod.1989 (with new Kontakt-5) and T-72BU (mean T-72B-Upgraded, the prototype of T-90, or even objects 187 and 188). And interesting objects 477 and 292 (T-80 with 152mm gun).
@@theangrychicken5026 Somehow somebody makes everything political🙄 I do not support Ukraine or Russia in this war but the people on both sides who unwillingly get dragged into it and suffer.
Ещё стоило упомянуть, что бронирование Объекта 490 в лобовой проекции составляло: - от кинетических боеприпасов до 2000 мм - от кумулятивных боеприпасов до 4000-4200 мм
@@ПолковникКовальский-р2и да, современные войны показали, что танки сильно устарели. Но Об. 490 создавался 30+ лет назад, когда на поле боя ещё не было дронов камикадзе. Хотя данный образец танкостроения был оснащëн бронекапсулой из комбинированной брони толщиной в 180 мм по кругу и в 80-90 мм с крыши и днища.
@@SilentioMortus современные урановые ломики сейчас способны пробить максимум до 1400 мм комбинированной брони. У Об. 490 защита от такого типа вооружения во лбу была до 2000 мм. Возможно единственный аллюминиевый прототип такой ломик бы и пробил, но серийную машину точно бы не пробили!
@@_FFGG_ современный бой показал, что танки нужны и без них никуда, но не такие сверх дорогие мастадонты, ибо 1-2 дрона выводят его в лучшем случае из строя
Thank you for your reply. I think the BMP series vehicles are armoured personnel carriers, and I would like to make a video dedicated to armoured personnel carriers.
АСУ-57 исходя из названия все же самоходная артиллерийская установка, а не танк. Удивлен её присутствием в кадре. Как и других САУ. Стоит исправить название на Советскую БТТ, если уж создавать подобный винегрет.
19:48 ну вообще то 1 прототип танка Объект 260 (он же ИС-7) выкатился на испытания осенью 1944 года. А вот последний прототип выехал на испытания в 1947 году.
Thank you for your reply, there are a lot of sample cars from the USSR, I just chose a selection of my favourite tanks to draw. I hope you continue to follow my channel.
One thing bothers me but its not issue with your animation (dont get me wrong animation is amazing). its the issue of what tanks are popular: Object 279 heavy tank was rejected quite very early in development in favor of... Object 770 (and Object 277 but it also got rejected while later) and for some reson everyone shows Object 279 when showing soviet tank developmet but not Object 770 which almost entered service, unlike Object 279
everything you said is correct, i mean that the tank that played a bigger role in soviet tank development is not shown in this or many similar videos just because the first one gets more love from the commmunity. Which is sad bc development of 277, 770 and 278 is very intersting considering things like 278's gas turbine engine or possibility of mounting 140mm smootbore gun (M-65GL Molot-T) on either one of those @@Epsilon2042
@@ЮраСидоров-т4э нет, Т-54 был средним танком, гений. Даже Т-64 бвл средним танком, и лишь Т-64А стал основным танком. И нет, ОБТ вообще не существует в советско-российской терминологии, существует именно основной танк, а ОБТ - это дословный перевод MBT - main battle tank. Но проблема в том, что в русском языке слово танк имеет только одно значение, поэтому слово боевой тут лишнее
i see 2 mistakes : u show the t-10m not the t-10, the muzzle brake is not the same and the t-64 mod 63 (obj 430)have not autoloader but it have a man loader like the t-62, t-64 mod 66 (obj 434) was the first version with autolader in armored warfare Obj 279, 490 and 640 are very fun to play
I really enjoyed this video, I love Russian/Soviet armoured vehicles, warplanes and naval vessels. It was nice to see some of the old vehicles that aren't in use anymore. I wonder what the Russians genuinely thought of the armoured vehicles that Britain and America supplied to them during the second World War and when I say I wonder I mean "off the record" as what we supplied to them was better than alot of the stuff that they were using at the time!
Многое из того, что вы поставляли по ленд-лизу вы сами применяли в войне на западном театре военных действий. И немецкие танки т-IV, т-V и т-VI показали, что они лучше американских и британский машин. Ваши танки даже близко не подошли по боевым характеристикам с русскими танками КВ-1, КВ-2, ИС-1, ИС-2 и Т-34. Будьте честны, хотя бы перед самим собой, ваша Матильда это просто убогое подобие танка. А вы в основном их и поставляли.
Чувак ты шутишь или бредишь? Русские танкисты считали английские и американские танки дерьмом с бензиновыми двигателями, которые горели как спичечные коробки.
Question T-74 main battle tank is there anywhere that as prototype or object 477 or 299 never heard them is those in kubinka tank museum as exhibition ?
странно, что названии видео присутствует слово эволюция, но уже в самом начале показываете ис-3 и ис-4. ИС-4 не был Эволюционным развитием конструкции танка ИС-3. Достаточно посмотреть на годы их разработки и производства. Это были два параллельных проекта тяжелых танков из которых более удачным получился ИС-3
As ridiculous as it is, you're right. The Kharkov Design Bureau really wanted to put the 130 mm gun on heavy tanks, but also because of it, most of the prototypes could not even make it to military trials. Soviet 130-mm gun S-69 (on its basis was created experimental tank gun S-70) had a rather low barrel life, which was tolerable in artillery, because there were not used shells with large powder filling, but for the tank gun it was necessary to have a ballistic straightness, which wore out the barrel after 300-400 shots.
you might not know but soviet also experimanted with 140mm guns, such as M-65GL Molot-T (there also was another one, 140mm "Razor") which was a 140mm smothbore gun based on 130mm M-65 (mounted on tanks like Object 279, Obj. 770 or Obj. 277) which fired APFSDS shells at about 1 700m/s which could pentrate 360mm of armor at 1km range... and all this in late 50's (soviets went crazy with this one. For comparison APDS shell fired from Chieftains's 120mm L11 could penetrate only 265mm at the same range - and it entered service few years after those soviet experiments). This gun was supposed to be mounted on Object 770 or Object 278 heavy tanks or Object 120 SU-152 Taran self-proppeled gun
@@ТимурФахуртдинов The Navy's 130mm gun is a B-13. Obviously, the tank gun was not made on its basis. The S-70 tank gun was made on the basis of the S-69 towed gun. I specifically stated the names so it can be googled.
QUESTION someone told me once that the 125 mm shell of the T-72 was a bigger warhead than the T-62’s 115mm,meant to be a bigger warhead,is the 125mm a enlarged 115mm warhead?
Well, there was the largest nuclear reactor, industrial and economic capacity, and good infrastructure The same applies to America, some money is for the development of the country and some is for the army
t-54 is medium tank, fool, t-62 was a last medium tank in Ussr. Only modification t-55 m1 and older classified like as "main battle tank" in ussr tank army.
Actually, the earliest production tanks did have 115mm gun initially (the same gun as the T-62) as the 125mm was not ready in time. Although, if I am not mistaken, those tanks were later retrofitted with the 125mm gun.
There were several projects labeled IS 6. None entered production, though at least one prototype was built. Probably it is the one you can see in some pictures and games
Los sovieticos solo diseñaron los planos y un solo prototipo que se llamo diferente, fueron los rusos quienes tomaron ese tanque y lo recontra mejoraron hasta llegar al.t-90M
Interesting fact: Obj 477, t64 and obj 490 Are officially made in Ukraine (at Kharkiv, also like t 34) Цікавий факт: Об 477, т64 та об 490 Були зроблені в Україні (у Харкові, як і т - 34)
@@Lost.InTheFog Actually, I think the video is right, some tanks were produced with the 115mm gun because the new 125mm wasn't ready in time. Video states 1000 tanks produced this way, I don't know whether or not this is accurate, but I do remember reading about early production models receiving the older gun. However, if I recall correctly, they were all later retrofitted with the 125mm gun.
You are a World of tanks player, am i right? If yes, wargaming fooled you, only T-62A (pre production versioon, only few where made) uses a 100mm gun, normal T-62 uses a 115mm U-5TS smoothbore gun
@@FF-zw9wf It's not really relevant, though. Probably a similar situation as with the T-64, where the planned gun was not ready in time so they put an older cannon on the initial tanks. That is how the early T-64s got the 115mm gun, although to my knowledge all of them were later retrofitted with the 125mm gun. It is an interesting fact to know, but not that relevant, even though in the case of T-64 a significant number of tanks did receive the 115mm gun. But the tank was always meant to have the new 125mm cannon, the cannon just wasn't ready in time.
My dude, I don't know if there are a lot of materials in English, but look for information about the "Sovershenstvovanie-88" program. All the latest "objects" shown in the video were developed within the framework of this competition. And the Object-490A not mentioned here. Most of them were created in metal (here it should be noted that we are talking about full-size running models of structural steel), Object-477 "Molot", had three prototypes, 2 of them were undergoing military testing, its development was conducted in 2007, when the new Defense Minister Serdyukov curtailed the program, and tried to buy wheeled tanks from the Italians. The developments on the 477 object became the basis for the T-14. Tank development stopped only with the collapse of the USSR and the monstrous economic disaster. The T-14 is an economically stripped down version of the tank that the USSR would have put into service sometime by 1995 (the planned date for the competition). And it is the most modest version of what was planned.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Introduction Cold War Soviet Tanks。Please follow my channel and let me know your preferences！Many thanks！This vedio is in need of some care and attention and may contain errors or inaccuracies. If you spot anything out of place, please let me know!
The T-54 and T-55 are the world’s most prolific mbts.They crushed Budapest in 56,stared down American tanks in Berlin in 61,fought in the 67,and 73 wars.Fought in the Vietnam war.Crushed Prague in 68,
Поставил мало опытных танков, их было куда больше, намного больше
There is much more,the T-54/55 has fought in wars in Africa,of course it was a T-54 that crashed through the gates of South Vietnam’s presidential palace in 1975.Hussein had thousands of T-55s,including Polish models with more oval shaped turrets,that fought Iran,and then confronted a 30 some country coalition led by a superpower in 1991.
The T-54/55 is the AK-47 of tanks,and the fact that the 54/55 was still considered a Main Battle Tank of the Warsaw Pact in the 1980s,is absolutely remarkable.
T54 , T55 were named Medium tanks. First MBT in USSR was T64.
ASU57 was not a tank too, it was self propelled gun.
Video is great though!
Can we all agree that this channel is very underrated
Thank you very much for your comment!
we can't
Great! It's notable to mention the T-44, which revolutionized Soviet tank development in a way
Well to be fair t-44 was built before cold War
@@Fesko-ly1wr first prototypes of T-44 and T-54 were build even at the end of WWII, before september 1 of 1945. Also there should be mentioned T-80BV - reactive armored T-80B, T-55AMV and T-62MV (both with explosive reactive armor), T-10 with T-10A or T-10M and it's early model called IS-8. As for tanks, there were extensive modernisation of IS-2 and T-34-85 in Cold-War Era. Oh, and there must be T-72AV (T-72A with reactive armor), T-72B mod.1989 (with new Kontakt-5) and T-72BU (mean T-72B-Upgraded, the prototype of T-90, or even objects 187 and 188). And interesting objects 477 and 292 (T-80 with 152mm gun).
Yes. 44 is beginning of era T-54 T-55 legends T-62 T-64 T-72 one of the best ever
very underrated.
Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.
zelenskys fanboy?
Agreed
Indeed
@@theangrychicken5026 Somehow somebody makes everything political🙄
I do not support Ukraine or Russia in this war but the people on both sides who unwillingly get dragged into it and suffer.
Really cool video. It's interesting to compare these machines with one another as well as WW2-era tanks and find out what inspired what.
Ещё стоило упомянуть, что бронирование Объекта 490 в лобовой проекции составляло:
- от кинетических боеприпасов до 2000 мм
- от кумулятивных боеприпасов до 4000-4200 мм
Всё же даже такая броня не спасёт от бомбы, но для защиты от этого есть, были и будут ПВО
Мне кажется современные снаряды смогли бы сделать пробитие и такого. Просто надобности нет. Ну и такие танки были бы золотые конечно.
@@ПолковникКовальский-р2и да, современные войны показали, что танки сильно устарели. Но Об. 490 создавался 30+ лет назад, когда на поле боя ещё не было дронов камикадзе.
Хотя данный образец танкостроения был оснащëн бронекапсулой из комбинированной брони толщиной в 180 мм по кругу и в 80-90 мм с крыши и днища.
@@SilentioMortus современные урановые ломики сейчас способны пробить максимум до 1400 мм комбинированной брони. У Об. 490 защита от такого типа вооружения во лбу была до 2000 мм. Возможно единственный аллюминиевый прототип такой ломик бы и пробил, но серийную машину точно бы не пробили!
@@_FFGG_ современный бой показал, что танки нужны и без них никуда, но не такие сверх дорогие мастадонты, ибо 1-2 дрона выводят его в лучшем случае из строя
Thank you sooooooo much!I have loved Soviet weaponry (particularly their armor )for years.
During 1945-1990 Soviet made 1000 prototipe tank
Great video and great animations...... subscribed.... continue the good job
Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.
I love Soviet weaponry!The AFVs were great also, the BTR-60,the BMP1,
Бмп 2 до сих пор используется в нашей армии, только ПТУР стал новее.
7:35 how beautiful
Can we just appreciate that the T-72 tank marked the beginning of the creation of the T-90M "Proryv"?
А как же сам Т-90?
you should have included the BMPs as well, considering you showed the IT-1
BMP is not really a tank, it’s IFV (Infantry fighting vehicle)
@@legiahuy9436 yeah, but the IT-1 is not really a tank either
@@jonaslavicka2411 Its an ATGM carrier, more comparable to a tank destroyer, which he showed multiple of, than an IFV
@@ryangoslingIRL yes I know that, my argument is that if tank destroyers are featured, IFVs should be as well
Thank you for your reply. I think the BMP series vehicles are armoured personnel carriers, and I would like to make a video dedicated to armoured personnel carriers.
АСУ-57 исходя из названия все же самоходная артиллерийская установка, а не танк. Удивлен её присутствием в кадре. Как и других САУ. Стоит исправить название на Советскую БТТ, если уж создавать подобный винегрет.
Согласен, с таким успехом можно было и 2с1, 2с3, 2с4, 2с5, 2с7 и так далее сувать
@@FF-zw9wf поддерживаю. Особенно смотрелся бы кадре миномет "Ока" он точно был бы уместен в рамках холодной войны чем какая-то асу-57
Pr. 490 is an insane design!
awesome, good transitions aswell!
Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.
Where is T-10 after IS-7?
Why T-54 1949 ,but not 1946?
wdym IS-7 was made in 1946-1949 when T-10 was in production from 1952, and T-10M from 1957
После смерти Иосифа Сталина IS-8 переименовали в Т-10
19:48 ну вообще то 1 прототип танка Объект 260 (он же ИС-7) выкатился на испытания осенью 1944 года.
А вот последний прототип выехал на испытания в 1947 году.
Very creative
Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.
Вечная слава Советскому Союзу!!!! И вооружались Советские люди именно для защиты от мирового капитализма!!!! Во главе с США!!!!
Great animation
欢迎来到油管！在b站喜欢看你的作品❤
object 490 might be the weirdest and the best looking tank at the same time
Уважаемый автор. Вы забыли - "Объект-279",1957года.
Thank you for your reply, there are a lot of sample cars from the USSR, I just chose a selection of my favourite tanks to draw. I hope you continue to follow my channel.
@@cucumberhistory274 Обязательно буду смотреть ваши видео, когда будет свободное время. С наступающим Новым Годом! 👍👍👍
@@Николай-1854 Happy New Year!
The object 490 looks like when i drew fictional tanks when i was little 😂
Yeah, I feel similar to the tanks in video games when I was a kid.
One thing bothers me but its not issue with your animation (dont get me wrong animation is amazing). its the issue of what tanks are popular: Object 279 heavy tank was rejected quite very early in development in favor of... Object 770 (and Object 277 but it also got rejected while later) and for some reson everyone shows Object 279 when showing soviet tank developmet but not Object 770 which almost entered service, unlike Object 279
Probably beacause the Object 279 is a "Nuclear" tank, meaning it was designed to survive a nuclear blast, to some limit, hence the hull shape...
Which means it was more interesting...
The 770 is just a normal heavy tank.
everything you said is correct, i mean that the tank that played a bigger role in soviet tank development is not shown in this or many similar videos just because the first one gets more love from the commmunity. Which is sad bc development of 277, 770 and 278 is very intersting considering things like 278's gas turbine engine or possibility of mounting 140mm smootbore gun (M-65GL Molot-T) on either one of those
@@Epsilon2042
Очень интересно и если посмотреть несколько роликов складывается общее впечатление о том, какая стратегия танкостроения была у разных стран.
t-54-55-62 not "main battle tank" , its "medium tanks". only T-64 "main battle tank" and others.
Wait, I'm pretty sure that after the T-72B and the T-80UD, there would be a T-72B3 and a T-80UK, respectively. Or are those just post cold war?
Thanks for the reply, post cold war tanks are not included in this video.
@@cucumberhistory274 Yeah, I was guessing they were post...
@@Epsilon2042 T-72B3 was introduced around 2010 if I remember correctly, and the T-80UK is just a command tank variant of the T-80U.
@@MaxCroat Oh ok, thanks.
Thanks, mate
Thank you very much. The next instalment is a history of the evolution of the American tank.
@@cucumberhistory274 cool, I'll watch it
Neitger T-54, 55, 62, nor T-64 (object-432) were main battle tanks. The 1st Soviet MBT was T-64A :)
"первым советским ОБТ" был Т-54, гений.
@@ЮраСидоров-т4э нет, Т-54 был средним танком, гений. Даже Т-64 бвл средним танком, и лишь Т-64А стал основным танком. И нет, ОБТ вообще не существует в советско-российской терминологии, существует именно основной танк, а ОБТ - это дословный перевод MBT - main battle tank. Но проблема в том, что в русском языке слово танк имеет только одно значение, поэтому слово боевой тут лишнее
@@drunklorry3406 Тут я тоже огу поспорить 😅
@@damirxp5599 вопрос только в том, насколько успешно :D
@@drunklorry3406это спорно, это как многие называют СТРВ103 и Центурионы ОБТ, забывая что они кроме них служили и другие типы танков.
i see 2 mistakes : u show the t-10m not the t-10, the muzzle brake is not the same and the t-64 mod 63 (obj 430)have not autoloader but it have a man loader like the t-62, t-64 mod 66 (obj 434) was the first version with autolader
in armored warfare Obj 279, 490 and 640 are very fun to play
everything about the video is great, just dont use google translate next time
I really enjoyed this video, I love Russian/Soviet armoured vehicles, warplanes and naval vessels. It was nice to see some of the old vehicles that aren't in use anymore.
I wonder what the Russians genuinely thought of the armoured vehicles that Britain and America supplied to them during the second World War and when I say I wonder I mean "off the record" as what we supplied to them was better than alot of the stuff that they were using at the time!
Многое из того, что вы поставляли по ленд-лизу вы сами применяли в войне на западном театре военных действий. И немецкие танки т-IV, т-V и т-VI показали, что они лучше американских и британский машин. Ваши танки даже близко не подошли по боевым характеристикам с русскими танками КВ-1, КВ-2, ИС-1, ИС-2 и Т-34. Будьте честны, хотя бы перед самим собой, ваша Матильда это просто убогое подобие танка. А вы в основном их и поставляли.
Чувак ты шутишь или бредишь? Русские танкисты считали английские и американские танки дерьмом с бензиновыми двигателями, которые горели как спичечные коробки.
In a nutshell, veterans of war used to say - USA, UK tanks are good, convenient for peaceful service, but not good for war.
the object 299 is alike the american TCM AGS
Всё что есть у вас янки всё это украдено, своего у вас нет ничего
@@АндрейЛевченко-д8щ i don't understand bro i am not even american
@@chewbacca7690 Бро , историю учил наверное в школе , почитай на досуге))
You are making a good Animation make more good Video.❤❤😊🎉
thanks
T-54/55 and the T-62 are not MBTs!!! ASU-57 is not a tank!!! The IT-1 is a tank destroyer!!! T-74 is armed with 125mm cannon! Not 130mm!!!
maybe u can do one for french tanks
Thank you for your reply, a video of the French tanks is in the works. It will be posted after the US, German and UK tank videos.
T54 was medium tank
T 54/55 medium tank , not MBT.The first Soviet tank as an MBT class is the T 62.
Question T-74 main battle tank is there anywhere that as prototype or object 477 or 299 never heard them is those in kubinka tank museum as exhibition ?
Можешь не сомневаться они точно есть. В видео показаны не все прототипы 😊
ASU-85 "assault gun" is parachute airdropped also.
странно, что названии видео присутствует слово эволюция, но уже в самом начале показываете ис-3 и ис-4. ИС-4 не был Эволюционным развитием конструкции танка ИС-3. Достаточно посмотреть на годы их разработки и производства. Это были два параллельных проекта тяжелых танков из которых более удачным получился ИС-3
Наоборот, как раз таки ИС-3, не удачный, его косяки пытались править в ИС-3М
@@_b_x_b_1063 ИС-3 это был прорыв танкостроения всего мира, с его щучим носом и колоссальной броней в купе его скорости.
Can you do also German Tanks?
More!!!!
Not Object 277 and 292?
Hoped to see Obj. 277 and Obj. 770. Otherwise, well done.
i thought the ASU-57 was WW2?
No. The USSR at the time did not yet have large enough transport planes to allow for the dropping of vehicles.
Асу-57 и Асу-85 были созданы для ВДВ - предшественники семейства Бмд.
If the cannon has a caliber of 130mm, the production will be canceled 🤣
As ridiculous as it is, you're right. The Kharkov Design Bureau really wanted to put the 130 mm gun on heavy tanks, but also because of it, most of the prototypes could not even make it to military trials. Soviet 130-mm gun S-69 (on its basis was created experimental tank gun S-70) had a rather low barrel life, which was tolerable in artillery, because there were not used shells with large powder filling, but for the tank gun it was necessary to have a ballistic straightness, which wore out the barrel after 300-400 shots.
@@Scorchluckdude… Russian naval guns calibre is 130mm and 152mm
you might not know but soviet also experimanted with 140mm guns, such as M-65GL Molot-T (there also was another one, 140mm "Razor") which was a 140mm smothbore gun based on 130mm M-65 (mounted on tanks like Object 279, Obj. 770 or Obj. 277) which fired APFSDS shells at about 1 700m/s which could pentrate 360mm of armor at 1km range... and all this in late 50's (soviets went crazy with this one. For comparison APDS shell fired from Chieftains's 120mm L11 could penetrate only 265mm at the same range - and it entered service few years after those soviet experiments). This gun was supposed to be mounted on Object 770 or Object 278 heavy tanks or Object 120 SU-152 Taran self-proppeled gun
@@ТимурФахуртдинов The Navy's 130mm gun is a B-13. Obviously, the tank gun was not made on its basis. The S-70 tank gun was made on the basis of the S-69 towed gun. I specifically stated the names so it can be googled.
QUESTION someone told me once that the 125 mm shell of the T-72 was a bigger warhead than the T-62’s 115mm,meant to be a bigger warhead,is the 125mm a enlarged 115mm warhead?
Нет они разные 115мм унитарный
125 раздельно гильзовый
Хотя возможно сами бопс имеют схожую конструкцию)
@@ПавелВикторов-е5ж I cannot read Russian
125 мм орудия танков те что после дракона предназначены не только для стрельбы снарядами но и для стрельбы РАКЕТАМИ
Maybe bit primitive looking video for someone but more accurare than many. e.g. Object 490 is often unknown for mass.
T-54 is actually medium
Pretty much energy in construction of this weapons instead of developing the Country.
Well, there was the largest nuclear reactor, industrial and economic capacity, and good infrastructure
The same applies to America, some money is for the development of the country and some is for the army
Если ты не хочешь кормить свою армию, то будешь кормить чужую
T-54, T-55 and T-62 were not main battle tanks. They were medium tanks. First main battle tank in the USSR was T-64
Music please
👍👍👍🇸🇮❤
Should have shown armor protection too imo
t-54 is medium tank, fool, t-62 was a last medium tank in Ussr. Only modification t-55 m1 and older classified like as "main battle tank" in ussr tank army.
T-64 was 125mm, not 115mm.
T-64a was 125mm gun
Actually, the earliest production tanks did have 115mm gun initially (the same gun as the T-62) as the 125mm was not ready in time. Although, if I am not mistaken, those tanks were later retrofitted with the 125mm gun.
@@MaxCroat only 600, and yes they were all converted to 2A26.
@@PugilistCactus yeah, but they still had it for a short while
Представте если бы советский союз всё еще выпускал танки
Уже дошли бы до чего-то, наподобие как в фильме "Хроники хищных городов" )
Please make a similar video for the Iraqi army 🇮🇶
Was the IS-6 even real or is it only real to me
There were several projects labeled IS 6. None entered production, though at least one prototype was built. Probably it is the one you can see in some pictures and games
Так же основной боевой танк Т-90 :😐😐😑😐😐
Los sovieticos solo diseñaron los planos y un solo prototipo que se llamo diferente, fueron los rusos quienes tomaron ese tanque y lo recontra mejoraron hasta llegar al.t-90M
Underrated
т-44 где ? Т-10М где ?
Т-55 not 39.5 tons
where t-26 , bt-5 and others?
EVOLUTION OF COLD WAR SOVIET TANKS
oh , yhea , sorry , i did not reade the entire title
my fault
Where T-14 Armata?
Где Т-90 и его модификации?
прочитай название ролика! Советские танки,а не Российские
@@ДенисСинилов-э1э т-72 хоть и разрабатывать начали в СССР и производство началось тоже в СССР но производят сейчас в России
Это танки Холодной войны, ролик так и называется. Соответственно, техника до 1991 года
@@ДенисСинилов-э1э прочитайте,мы с вами вместе не пили и бабу не делили
But the T-90?
Chinese tanks are also carousel, so it's easy to jump on them.
😎💪
WTF???? WHAT about T90 and Armata???
it is a video during soviet cold war era, T-90 and T-14 are russians
@@stefphoenix9642 T-90 Vladimir (1991)
Interesting fact:
Obj 477, t64 and obj 490
Are officially made in Ukraine (at Kharkiv, also like t 34)
Цікавий факт:
Об 477, т64 та об 490
Були зроблені в Україні (у Харкові, як і т - 34)
Харьковский завод и Ленинградский были основными танковыми заводами советского союза, в 80-х к ним подключился и Омский с Тагильским
W
Прямо синий трактор по полям !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
T-34🤨???
Este videos avarca desde 1945 hasta 1991 el t-34 se creo en 1942
The T64A has a 125mm gun not 115 mm
i thought so too, but the prototype version actually did have the same 115mm gun that was on the t62. the 125 was fitted on the production models.
ah@@Lost.InTheFog
@@Lost.InTheFog Actually, I think the video is right, some tanks were produced with the 115mm gun because the new 125mm wasn't ready in time. Video states 1000 tanks produced this way, I don't know whether or not this is accurate, but I do remember reading about early production models receiving the older gun. However, if I recall correctly, they were all later retrofitted with the 125mm gun.
@@MaxCroat could very well be the case. I only did a quick google search. Thanks for the info
@@Lost.InTheFog of course, no problem
Как то резко закончились русские танки на 91 году , а дальше вплоть до "Ароматы" ?
тут перечень только советских танков)
@@СергейЗахаров-й3в7к понятно.😁
T90 ??????
Los sovieticos solo hicieron los planos y los rusos los continuaron
bri accurate of obj490 not like that form like armored warfare it another form
Object 490 💀
gaijin pls
Nato was well and truly fucked if the USSR hadn't collapsed
De hecho, la urss sola sin sus aliados ya tenia 4 veces mas tanques y armas que toda la otan
The automatic loader - it was greatest mistake of the soviet ingineers
а потом произошел самый счастливый год 1991-1992
в кавычках
@@arnoldlynchthewanderer без кавычек
@@nektar4ik и почему же?
@@arnoldlynchthewanderer ну по крайней мере,для Украины и Казахстана это прям счастье,а для балков тоже норм
@@nektar4ik полный бред, учи историю и поймёшь, что никто украинцев, белорусов и казахов не морил
У вас отсутствует танк т-90, т-34, т-44, кв-1, кв-2, кв-1с. Армата.
Название ролика прочитайте внимательнт
most of the tanks evolutions you see in this video are just project😂😂😂 nothing was ever really done loool
Asi es y porque te ries?
Los proyectos de tanques fallidos son muy comunes no es para reirse considerando la otan tambien tuvo muchos prototipos
is not historically accurate
До Т-64 понятия "ОБТ" не существовало во всем мире.ПТ-76 не относится к морскому флоту и это не легкий танк.Автору дизлайк
Больше половины дат высосано из пальца
Автор, Т-54, 55, 62 - это средние танки, а не основные. Мидл, не мэйн.
Во времена холодной войны термин "средний танк" уже не использовали. Автор всё правильно сделал
T-62 have 100 mm gun
You are a World of tanks player, am i right?
If yes, wargaming fooled you, only T-62A (pre production versioon, only few where made) uses a 100mm gun, normal T-62 uses a 115mm U-5TS smoothbore gun
@@VulcanCannon_yes you are right, but t62a with 100mm gun must have
@@FF-zw9wf It's not really relevant, though. Probably a similar situation as with the T-64, where the planned gun was not ready in time so they put an older cannon on the initial tanks. That is how the early T-64s got the 115mm gun, although to my knowledge all of them were later retrofitted with the 125mm gun. It is an interesting fact to know, but not that relevant, even though in the case of T-64 a significant number of tanks did receive the 115mm gun. But the tank was always meant to have the new 125mm cannon, the cannon just wasn't ready in time.
Художник так себе
Viel Viel Viel SCHROTT!!!
This is scrap metal compared to US tanks!
Funny how all the vehicles in the thumbnail are fake/propaganda/non-functional vehicles
There not fake my guy there is literally photos of them built now prototypes? Yes but not fake
They are prototypes not fake
Tank museum in Kubinka - Do i am a joke to you?
My dude, I don't know if there are a lot of materials in English, but look for information about the "Sovershenstvovanie-88" program. All the latest "objects" shown in the video were developed within the framework of this competition. And the Object-490A not mentioned here.
Most of them were created in metal (here it should be noted that we are talking about full-size running models of structural steel), Object-477 "Molot", had three prototypes, 2 of them were undergoing military testing, its development was conducted in 2007, when the new Defense Minister Serdyukov curtailed the program, and tried to buy wheeled tanks from the Italians. The developments on the 477 object became the basis for the T-14. Tank development stopped only with the collapse of the USSR and the monstrous economic disaster. The T-14 is an economically stripped down version of the tank that the USSR would have put into service sometime by 1995 (the planned date for the competition). And it is the most modest version of what was planned.
Smartest furry
😭😭😭😭😭😀😀😀🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣