Nigel Farage: Wrong About Deportations
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- Buy courses here: www.academic-a...
Sub to my substack here: substack.com/p...
Join the channel here: / @academicagent
Merch: aas-house-of-m...
All my vital links: unpopular.acad...
Very heartening stats near the end
funny that half century later europe is slowly turning back to it's multi cultural roots albeit mostly east to west.
Why do people separate culture and ethnicity? No English therefore no English culture. Culture is now boiled down to 'fan boys' who ware the English t-shirt.
Political correctness says both culture and ethnicity is nothing to do with genes.
Because something something Nazi Germany
New world boundaries apply here; the new Englishman and Englishwoman will not be white, and they probably won't be from England. The new English are being forged in the crucibles of London and Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester. It will become a polyglot, mongrel culture where the primary signifier of identity is a passport. Blair's perfect world.
Wear*
@@inquiringminds6633 thank you and apologies.
The towns and cities - and indeed the politics of the British Isles are changing precisely because of skin colour. The more we import from a foreign culture, the more our lives are impacted.
I'm tired of people separating culture from race, as if culture sprouted up in a vacuum.
it actually sprouts from the soil like toads
Edgington is great. A real asset to our side. GB News in general have been quite good of late. They were the only broadcaster that reported from the recent Rotherham trial.
Never forget, Farage gloated about destroying the BNP
The BNP were a joke. Politics is about shifting goal posts to get mass support. Farage is the best communicator we have but needs to pushed into moving the needle.
@@cyberninjazero5659 And don't forget he also abandoned UKIP
The BNP was a joke. Politics is about shifting goal posts to garner mass support. Just like Salmond did with Scottish Independence. Farage is one of the best communicators we have. He just needs to be pushed into moving the dial.
@jackarcher9652 do you not think the BNP would be at 4 million votes mark like reform had they not been stamped out by state and media. I'm not so sure that wouldn't be the case
Farage is a silly weak old boomer @@jackarcher9652
Here's the thing - One shooting incident and all law abiding citizens all lose our guns (Dunblane), yet illegal immigrants commit crime on a much bigger scale and the law abiding tax payers don't lose our illegal immigrants. This is not about criminality or safety, it's about repression of the native populace.
Exactly. Thanks for pointing that out!
Now start noticing who's pushing it on a global scale.
Clear them out !
Farage is controlled opposition, very slick and expensive operator, do not pin hopes on him.
Farage is playing it clever and safe, he's trying to attract the more middle of the road centrists. He understands he is walking a tightrope and that if he uses one wrong phrase he will be outcast like Tommy and Enoch and set the movement back 30 years and undo all his hard work in an instant. You will understand the context of his stance if you watch a speech he gave in America about Enoch Powell. It's on RUclips but it's difficult to find. He explains his reasoning for his careful approach perfectly in it.
Correct
This crowd calls anyone who is less fundamentalist then them 'controlled'. It's not necessarily the case. Some are just trying to find what they see as a manageable compromise. You may think they're wrong, but it doesn't always mean they've been paid off or something.
Might want to ask if you yourself are 'controlled'. AA and those like him are very persuasive.
@@justingeneral3078 Farage is literally pro-Israel and was firmly against the BNP and has warned against all other potential groups like it. He has said many things that others were afraid too, but if he repeats that England is England, regardless of its population, as long as the culture is present then he is an enemy of the natives.
What you can fundalmentalist and balance are really just clear oppoosition and compromises in favour of the enemy.
@@justingeneral3078 Good point, well made.
Farage doesn't want to scare the horses.
That's what they say. Or does he like to think that the country makes the people ('magic soil') and not that the people make the country?
Farge has a boomer mindset and understands that mindset. It leads to the following notion: "rounding certain people up, en masse, and deporting them is a bit too mid-century German (and logistically difficult, and the liberal press will have a field day). Besides, My gRaDNdDad fOuGhT tHE gERmaNs bEcAUsE tHEy rOunDed pEOplE uP!
Isn't it interesting how each of the parties suddenly acquired ethnic minority (read City of London) money and influence? Have you seen an ethnic minority politician speaking on this matter in Europe? I haven't. Together with the posh boys, our minorities have been groomed for decades with, I think, undeserved degrees and jobs in The City and law, just ready to fill the government with people who will defend the invasion to the bitter end.
Culture is derived from an ethnic group.
Christianity was the best attempt as resolving ethnic rivalries. Its rapid dismantling has ensured the re-emergence of competing tribes. Without its Christian heritage the west in general and England in particular is host to whatever political fashions are in vogue.
@@borderlands6606 Specifically all following the Catholic Church. After Protestantism came about the sectarian split exacerbated ethnic divisions.
@@ilikethiskindatube Agreed, though for clarity it's important to distinguish Eastern (Orthodox) and Western (Catholic) churches, who split in the C11th - before the Norman Invasion (from an English context).
@@ilikethiskindatubeMany ethnic divisions we're exacerbated by papalism, for instance Augustine failing to respect the celtic bishops and Lanfrancus failing to respect the anglosaxon saints. Every time it is what you get with an imposition of a foreign culture.
Although ethnicity is an important component of culture, it certainly isn't the only one. Even amongst the remaining native population, a great deal of English culture has been forgotten.
Culture is based on nature.
Race begat culture since the dawn of time
Farage was all over the place in this soft core interview, probably one of his worst for a long time.
Goes on about things being a political impossibility in the current political reality.
Well Nigel there's the problem, people are sick of the current political reality not serving them but the other.
The reality is this for me...IF and I mean IF...the incoming lot were better than "us" in every measurable way and a real benefit then I could "maybe" accept what was happening. It would still be a hard sell.
But they are patently NOT! not in a whole group sense. The various evidences are there. None screams it so loudly to me from the evidence that the gov wants to hide, not collect, not report or fudge numbers on ethnicity data as it pertains to what we might call "bad effect". If this really was an unalloyed good the eliteorata would be crowing the numbers from dawn till dusk.
So yes Nigel, we are looking for new political realities and if you insist on remaining with the old one you will not provide an answer.
For engineers the ship of Thesus analogy has never made sense. You don't throw any lump of timber in to replace a plank of a ship. It usually has to be a particular species of wood, that's been dried properly and cut to spec. High functioning countries like Germany attempting to integrate bushmen is akin to throwing sand into the petrol tank, which is of course the entire point.
What I cannot grasp is *why* it's the point. Vengeance perhaps but from a power perspective this self decay is ultimately going to dethrone our elite and leave the much vaunted democracy, Israel, undefended.
"Mass deportations are a political impossibility"
"Why"
"Because I won't make the argument for them.... Now, where's my Question Time invite?"
Farage's comments are little better than those of Laurence Fox, who recently said he would be happy to see Britain 95% African. As long as they adopted a couple of British values
@@alexdavis1541 he’s got to try and keep his girlfriend on side 🙉
Wtf was he stoned? I struggle to believe that's true
@@sorrysirmygunisoneba And his brother-in-law
@@RichardPhillips1066 In a recent debate with Steve Laws. I kid you not
"The people make the country; the country doesn't make the people" ~ Mark Steyn, principled nationalist.
When Farage said he didn’t care about demographics, Steve should have took it to the extreme and asked him if he would be fine with the British being 1% of the population.
Yes. Farage is sounding out of date with this stuff.
A lot of his comments about community is nonsense too, nobody ever talked about 'communities' until mass immigration flooded us, it was neighbourhoods and friends. Many of us still do have this, it's completely demographic change. The rise in violent crimes, crimes we never even had here before either, the number of rapes is utterly shocking, gangs of child rape, beheadings, it's all imported violence.
Stats please ...not dramatic rhetoric.
Stats? And where would you like these stats from? More than happy to pull them out of my ass for you, if you like?
Or we can just look at government stats - as if they're to be trusted in anyway - published by the ONS, but they changed how data is recorded etc.
Either open your eyes or piss off
@evad7933
How much Islamic terrorism did we have here before Islam moved here? How many Islamic rape gangs here before 1945?
When was honour killing a thing in the UK?
Why is forced marriage a thing now?
Why is FGM a thing now?
Why is cousin marriage a thing now?
Why does the MET need specific units to focus on black gun crime?
"community" is code for: not the common, ordinary British man or woman (i.e not Anglo-Saxon/Celt, not LGHDTV 🏳🌈). You will never hear: "the white-British community" or "the straight community". That meaning of community rose as the conventional meaning of community (the 'commune' of neighborhood/town residents) fell. 🤔
@@evad7933 "Citation needed". Oh dear.
If we were being honest with ourselves, we knew Farage would be like this.
uh-huh.
The gradual realisation that Reform is ‘containment’ is disconcerting. This does present an opportunity for a fresh start with added clarity. Perhaps it’s time for Boomers to take a step back while a new movement emerges.
They wont step back until they step forward into six foot holes.
@ZeonAndOnly
And they want to take the rest of us with them.
b-b-but 'magic soil'!, 'Fresh Prince!', 'what would the Austrian painter do (so we don't go anywhere remotely near it)!'
Didn't see the original interview, I find Farage predictable.
However for him to say he is not concerned about demographics, and at the same time talk about the lack of integration, I find staggering?
Surely both are related?
Farage has no balls, he has form when the going gets tough, he has been proven to be part of the machinery, a poor imitation.
Very disconcerting especially when you consider the fact that every single one of his answers has him follow THE logical train of thought, get to the line, and come to outright wrong conclusions.
This is why I love this channel and AA...
Well his answers are incredibly disappointing...
A politician is a politician is a politician.
Sadly, Nigel isn't an ethnat or anything near to that. He's far too weak sauce on this and most other issues.
And the people that were "moved" after WW2 were not fresh off the boat, or had merely lived there for 10-20 years, they were in many cases driven from their ancestral homelands where they had lived for many centuries. Giving Eastern Germany to Poland was like as if someone gave half of Spain "back" to Morocco. Dramatic, historic changes.
Farage is right... if you dress up 100,000,000 Congolese in pin striped suits, bowler hats, and umbrellas, nothing will change: it's all about de culture in it.
nıgel farage ıs another actor .. no one ız gıong knowher .. the state has sıgned un mıgratıon compact , marrakesh and barecelona agreements .. yu cant vote yur way out of thıs
This cryptospeak....
@@magiuy necessary, comments get pruned very easily
There's plenty of daylight between The Impossible and the politically impossible.
I wont vote Reform again if he's this wet. Reform being 1990's tories wont suffice.
19:36 fascinating
“Race is culture and culture is race”-Bowden
He has built his brand on being nonracially aware, he won't change now without significant pressure, although i guarantee he senses the popular shift.
But why he thinks he should impose English culture on the new British is a mysteryh, it sounds like a colonial hangover.
In this video I realy notice your British thinking, somehow presenting this brutal ethnic sorting after WWII as a good thing. Also the ethnicities weren't sortet "back" into their homelands, their homelands were artificially created. The "melting pot" is the natural state of eastern Europe. Germans for centuries have been the upper classes and merchants in Eastern Europe and it was a good thing. Evil England and Russia wanted to destroy Germany and deportet the German elites to get Eastern Europe into Russias sphere of influence - with terrible consequences for the population. Easern Europe desperately needs a German upper class to function!
'Mass deportation is impossible.....'
'Eisenhower did it....'
Edward Longshanks did it.
Romans did. Assirians did. English did. Reimigration and deportation is relativly easy if it is a will.
I think an important detail is that he said deportations are 'politically impossible' 7:48 - 7:52
"Race is culture and culture is race" - Roland Rat
Can the boomer cons just retire in Tuscany or something?
*/tedious criticism about the intro being long*
What annoyed me intensely about Edgington here was this. Fine he says it's not possible, instead of coming back to the issue and getting the same answer I wanted him to ask "WHY?" Why does he think this, what impediments does he see? If not this then what?
It seems to me Nigel values the institutions of the country highly, but he think they'll be just the same if they are populated by people who never believed in them, or actively hate them, or never invested in them.
He did ask why, he used that exact word, "Why?"
British-Iranians always seem to carry more respect and love for British culture in their hearts than your average Brit. Must be a cultural thing ;)
Great video. I'd really love to hear your opinion on the plight of Yugoslavia and it's eventual demise due to similar circumstances.
The statistics about european nations becoming ethnically homogenous mid 20th century were amazing AA
UKIP better. Nick Tenconi. We need Christianity.
Your problem is that there is no Christianity in England. So there's no England now.
Thunor sends his regards.
@@AlexanderJonesRUclips Christ is King. There's no England NOW
An organized minority with a singular focus on white wellbeing would be a powerful force to reckon with.
Garage has the standard “boomer” argument. Deport the bad, keep the good! Which ignores the fact that, good or bad, they are alien.
Make way for the chairman
You don't need to deport them. Just stop paying them to be here and they'll self deport on their own initiative.
Nigel has went soggy since coming in as an MP, I guess it’s early days yet so he’s playing it too safe but it’s dangerous. I still know he is much better for everyone in Number 10 rather than what we have had in the last 20 years. Can always move away from him as he isn’t “conservative enough” if you get my drift.
When has he ever not been soggy about any issue that really mattered? Show me just one example.
@@benisrood Stop paying France as they can’t stop the boats, turn them round and send them back to France. Pretty vanilla basic stuff compared to days gone, but still more than what others have said.
@@benisrood Making businesses pay more NI for anyone who is employed that is a foreign national compared to a UK national.
@@benisrood Ban trans ideology in schools
@@benisrood leaving ECHR
An unexpected Bowden quote thrown in there. The doors must be close to wide open if he can be openly quoted like that now.
Really shows how hopeless our situation is when Palestinians have more representation in parliament than the English
" race is culture and culture is race"
Who said this? i can't find it. (Got some funny responses from various browsers though😅)
But it's not really true, is it? For example, Irish Travellers are 100% white but they are completely incompatible with Western high culture.
@@viron6734 I'm not arguing it is, just want to know who the "great man" he is referring to is.
AA, I agree with your take, and I'm not English or living in the UK. But where would your Iranian father fit into the picture of "race is culture and culture is race"? Certainly, even though rare, some integration is possible if the outsiders are a minority within a new culture, they can internalize it
Curious on this as well, and not just as some gotcha. Admitting that race is culture and vice versa, action obviously has to be taken on that principle. If say Laws and the Homeland Party come into power, and carry out deportations as well they should, is there any reason why he should be exempt? The Bomalians are indeed a bigger problem, but are Bomalians with British ancestry off the hook, even if they exhibit the usual behavior and policy is being made solely with the idea of "you are a foreign element" in mind?
Your counter-argument about the political viability of mass deportations was weak. The fact it took Two World Wars to ethnically re-organize Europe flies in the face of that. Most of the post-WW2 deportations were better characterized as expulsions. 5 million Germans were expelled from modern day Prussia with 2 million deaths. The Red Army was forcibly removing people from their lands. You should have used Eisenhower as your example! The very precedent Farage brought up yet went on to dismiss mass deportations as an impossibility!
You're weak.
People should goad Musk, telling him getting to mars is much easier than mass deportations. Ultimately it's the mega wealthy who are responsible for open borders
Farage is a coward
RIP Britain
Of course he is wrong, when has he been right about anything??? Especially on this issue he has never been anything other than a snake.
If race is culture amd culture is race how do we explain pre and post WW2 Japan?
They are as ethnically homogeneous as you can get yet their culture changed massively in just a few years.
Atomic trauma.
They are occupied by America, you would act differently if a perverted bully now lived in your house.
Ethnicity is not equal culture, but it is a contatining and sustainer of the said culture. Race is being one part of ethnicity. You can force people to adapt different cultural elements, but under the hood they will keep their's differencise becaue ehtnic heritage. As example Japan still very uniqley japanese even when they are adopted a lot of western elements. And Japan is a funny example anyway, because the divide is not Pre-WWIII and Post-WWII. Meiji or Taisho era Japan was not entirly same Japan thet attacked Pearl Harbor.
The form has always changed. The functions, much less so. Germany is particularly instructive here. Read Jerome K. Jerome's 'three men on the bummel'. For centuries the favourite phrase of the German abroad is best summed up as 'in *Germany* this is just not done; instead we do X'. Of course, 'X' has changed many times. The distinct attitude remains, and its source is clear.
Other than in Europe and India there have been a significant number of population exchanges and other large movements in the last century or so. Most are not associated with the outcome of wars or intercommunal violence. Few have garnered much international attention, let alone opprobrium.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union the peripheral 15 or so Soviet republics experienced an exodus of, mostly, Russians that only gathered pace over time. Latvia was majority Russian. It isn't now.
Turkey and Greece agreed huge population exchanges after WW1. When Algeria became independent a million ethnic French left, of their own volition. Similar numbers in Angola and Mozambique regarding the Portuguese. Rhodesia experienced a similar exodus but over a more extended period.
Israel has had more exceptional circumstances but it maintains the status quo by importing favoured people. Then there is Fiji, which was majority Indian on independence from Britain. Today it is majority Fijian.
Most (not all obviously) of these exchanges took place with little or no conflict. Without drawing much attention from other governments, the UN or the press.
And most of these exchanges took place voluntarily, against a background of, "Well the locals are going to favour their own in every way, I'd rather be with mine"
Let's not forget, as anyone who has migrated in their lives knows, just as you can get on a plane and arrive, so you can get on a plane and go back.
All the West needs to do is decide it is going to favour their own. Outsiders will go
None of the things you talked about happened "with little or no conflict"! The Greeks and Turks exchanged populations because the Greeks where being killed in Turkey and Turks where being killed in Greece. None of the populations you've mentioned left voluntarily all did so under duress and amidst situations of violence and/or war.
@@toprob20 Of course there were tensions in all cases. Otherwise the movements would not have happened en masse. But the point is these situations had not necessarily escalated to the status of war. I can think of few ex-Soviet republics where the situation escalated to open or sustained violence against Russian immigrants, for example.
In situations where war had resulted in movements, in the examples I listed this was typically the outcome after the end of a war.
The real issue for us in the west today though is that population movements can and do take place where the circumstances are such that few in the rest of the world take much notice.
People like Farage do actually want a return to a British Britain but are afraid to say so because they think international criticism necessarily has to be the result.
It only has to be the case if you do it wrong, as we have seen in my examples
Look what they did to Yitzhak Rabin.
And look what we tolerate.
Not saying Farage is our guy but in my opinion, we should all join reform, keep our heads down, try to gain influence and stand as candidates, then push the leadership to the right.
Gotta try.
We did this already, all of our candidates have been banned from the party.
As evidenced by the bending of the knee to HnH and their hit piece "journalism"
@@highmarshalhelbrecht4715some argue Lice was only leader to clear out the real right, so Nigel could take over and not get his hands bloody
@@RichardPhillips1066 Lice funded the party with his own money, though.
@@highmarshalhelbrecht4715 did you see the reform youth? They all want remigration. There’s a solid base for these ideas.
I'm white British and so are my kids and if Farage isn't concerned about their future then who do I turn to?
Someone much further right?
Who?
Don't know about "much further right" but try true nationalist. Patriotic Alternative are good folks🙂
@@andrewnetz3680PA aren’t a party though. Heritage party and Homeland are more influential.
@@antonrudenham3259 Homeland Party, British Democrats and English Democrats
@@Valencetheshireman927 We're not voting ourselves out of this (though of course support Whte positive local candidates if available) - time to think of other ways to take back our countries, bit by bit. Woodlander initiativ - and similar - comes to mind🙂
I agree with your message, but I don't think that this is the right time for Nigel (and others to be pushing this). Britain is too 'not-racist', and communities are too integrated to be the first European country to mass deport. I think someone like France or Germany were to do it first, then Britain would come soon after.
It was a terrible interview and very clear Farrage is there to get himself Prime minister or a lordship. His answers were so tepid and safe. When can someone actually say and do what needs to be done.
A few weeks back I was saying to those in my circle that we need to give Reform a chance as they are the only group on our side making inroads into the current system. I said that we need to put our minor differences to one side. But I was wrong. I can't support civic nationalism.
The prospective deportees are completely dependent upon the state to exist here. That means they can easily be accounted for and removed. Those who flee into the general population and go onto commit crimes can be removed easily after the fact.
Those who do not commit crimes and find modes of subsistence outside the law are a problem of course but FAR less so than what we have right now. Also, they would likely ultimately leave voluntarily.
So he just talks about deportations. He won't actually do it. He talks as if his enemies have his family hostage or something
I gave up on Farage when he resigned as UKIP leader immediately after winning the Brexit referendum rather than pushing ahead to endure that Brexit was actually achieved. He effectively destroyed UKIP with his behind the scenes machinations. He manouevred the disastrous Henry Bolton into the leadership ahead of Anne-Marie Waters. Waters had very strong views on islam, which Farage, for some reason, didn't like.
Farage looks very like controlled opposition.
I agree with the premise that they can be sent back, but the difference between multicultural Europe then, and now is that they were all Christian, similar cultures, the process was simple.
Now those coming to Europe now are African, middle eastern, Asian from all over the world, from poor destitute countries, sending them back would be chaos, they will not go willingly, violence and resistance will be the norm, they have nothing to lose, by their nature most view living within the rules of society tolerable in the west at most, they are survivors they have no respect for law and order now, imagine their reply to forced repatriation.
I want them to leave, asap, but the reality will be difficult, I pray not, we shall see
Doesn't surprise me from Farage. Bringing up mass deportations is a good sorting mechanism for finding out who is serious about the problem.
Even Conservative hopeful Jenrick is saying that the UK needs to opt out of the ECHR as a first step to sorting out migration.
Immigration was literally the first page on the Reform UK Policy "Contract" Nigel, you mook!
I think if Farage did what you suggest AA, Labour would put forward a vote to have him expelled as a member of parliament which the Tories would support, and Farage knows this. There's talk of the AFD being banned in Germany but it's difficult. I don't think it would be remotely difficult for Labour to ban Reform.
I take issue with this for the following reasons:
1) While it may appear to be in the interest of the Tories to remove one of their most dangerous rivals, it would actually serve to further weaken their base and it would be very unlikely for them to secure the unanimous support of their MPs to support the motion for various reasons.
2) Such an action by the Labour Party would alarm and further radicalise sections of the elite and elites-in-waiting against them.
3) If Trump wins then his personal relationship with Farage would almost certainly cause diplomatic headaches and consequences for the government if such a course of action were pursued.
4) Even if Farage were expelled he could simply put himself up for reelection in the subsequent by-election. If reelected then this would be a major defeat for the government - it makes them look weak and powerless.
In order to get him in such a way they would likely to have to lay criminal charges against him and convict him a term of imprisonment longer than one year in order to prevent his candidacy. If he makes his remarks in Parliament then Parliamentary Privilege would protect him from such charges.
It is far riskier for the government to attempt this than to just contain Farage because in order to be successful the stars have to align and any misstep (of which there are countless perils) turns Farage into a martyr and gives him the ‘oxygen of publicity’.
I take issue with this for the following reasons:
1) While it may appear to be in the interest of the Tories to remove one of their most dangerous rivals, it would actually serve to further weaken their base and it would be very unlikely for them to secure the unanimous support of their MPs to support the motion for various reasons.
2) Such an action by the Labour Party would alarm and further radicalise sections of the elite and elites-in-waiting against them.
3) If Trump wins then his personal relationship with Farage would almost certainly cause diplomatic headaches and consequences for the government if such a course of action were pursued.
4) Even if Farage were expelled he could simply put himself up for reelection in the subsequent by-election. If reelected then this would be a major defeat for the government - it makes them look weak and powerless.
In order to get him in such a way they would likely to have to lay criminal charges against him and convict him to a term of imprisonment longer than one year in order to prevent his candidacy. If he makes his remarks in Parliament then Parliamentary Privilege would protect him from such charges.
It is far riskier for the government to attempt this than to just contain Farage because in order to be successful the stars have to align and any misstep (of which there are countless perils) turns Farage into a martyr and gives him the ‘oxygen of publicity’.
A civ Nat what a surprise ,he has got into Parliament job done, shades of Ukip bail out again so disappointed .
Nige straddles the fence, takes it in the bollocks. Still, he's done indispensable works.
Those already in is a huge pull factor for more to come. Can´t see you can get immigration under control without mass deportation.
Farage just wants to be apart of the establishment, it is Tice for who destiny calls.
Farage seems totally out of touch with his base. Like every other politician.
Something I had to tell my mate about farage is a career politician. He can't not come out and say he's worried about race, that will label him a wacist, it'll lose him votes and will probably be career ending for him.
Same with ever other answer he gave
Mr Edgington is an interviewer who's stood out to me for many years. On youtube.
I’ve been watching AA for a many years now and I don’t want to do this but it has been coming for a long time. Does AA realize that he is brown? I know he likes to think of himself as white British welsh first. But what about his ethnicity. Culture seems to have rubbed of on him despite himself. Neema is an Iranian name last time I checked.
I noticed this in the filter, YT automatically hid the comment. I have approved it. To answer your question it's perfectly simple: half and half, can you comprehend this stunning concept? Race is real and I am half and half. If it wasn't how else could we say this? I do not claim to be "just as British" as the next guy either owing to this fact. I deal in facts. My feelings or your or anyone else's are not relevent. The fact is: half and half. You know the Mid-Century Germans were able to understand this and even codified it into law.
@@AcademicAgent So why is it that a half and half you seem to have absorbed mostly the British elements of you nature and not the Iranian ones? What does this mean for people like Thomas Sowell? Has he not absorbed the tributes of a western individual? Should he and his children go back to Africa even though they have absorbed the culture? Where is the line? I’m Indian myself and you have made it clear. Not matter how much I like Shakespeare, Dickens or Austen I will always be fully brown and not welcome. Sucks for me I guess. But lucky you half and half!
@@kiyankurji67 The African-American population are quite a unique case. I have Iranian elements, my inherent distrust of those in power, my immunity to the lies of you know who, certain tendencies towards black and white thinking (characteristic), I've made videos on Iranian stuff, naturally I have more knowledge of it than most. On being Indian, there is nothing wrong with who you are and where you come from, but you have to be honest about that. If Justin Trudeau dresses in Indian clothes and tries to dance like an Indian, we know, you know, he's never going to become Indian. No one would dispute this, so why is it disputed the other way around? It's not a case of "welcome" or "not welcome", but the question is can you ever truly get beyond the stage of wearing "borrowed clothes"? Since reading Spengler, I am of the view that the clothes are always borrowed. In my case, half-borrowed. One can see this by imaginging a scenario in which the entire nation was populated by Indians and Africans eating fish and chips, watching Eastenders and drinking tea. Let's not pretend things would not be different. The sooner everyone is honest about this, the better. It may be difficult to come to terms with for people who grew up here, myself included, but the truth is not always something that makes us feel good.
@@AcademicAgent Alright I can get behind that a little better.
A good discussion...well said both of you.
So skin colour / race has nothing to do will skin colour, that's what he just said, sounds like a shitlib to me
ruclips.net/video/MXnO4Rcamis/видео.htmlsi=hGcjA9Gpo0qMWkJi This will add context as to why he said what he said.
Farage sounds like 2016 Sargon.
A million dollar intro
Not wrong response, but too safe and not strong enough. Tepid at best
Race is culture and culture is race. See you later then AA.
Your Union flags are upside down.
Who said "race is culture and culture is race" ?
Absurd answers from Farage.
Farage is a constant disappointment
It's always the hope that gets you AA.
Farage is playing it clever and safe, he's trying to attract the more middle of the road centrists. He understands he is walking a tightrope and that if he uses one wrong phrase he will be outcast like Tommy and Enoch and set the movement back 30 years and undo all his hard work in an instant. You will understand the context of his stance if you watch a speech he gave in America about Enoch Powell. It's on RUclips but it's difficult to find. He explains his reasoning for his careful approach perfectly in it.
Uh-huh... just trust the plan, bro..
@@M4dM4n96 ruclips.net/video/MXnO4Rcamis/видео.htmlsi=LqsUEqcEMIR4VyFz He said it almost explicitly.
He explains how Enoch shot himself in the foot with the rivers of blood speech in this interview.
I hope Farage is playing a game with his answers here.
@@M4dM4n96 you are ignorant, educate yourself. Look up what farage said in a speech in America about Enoch Powell
He nearly died, for heavens sake!
Becomes an MP and backtracks
Containment and chief
17:45 Ta-de-oosh, perhaps?
"Get them out"!