Dr. Michael S. Heiser on Dating the Book of Daniel
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- #prophecy #daniel #apocalyptic
Dr. Heiser discusses when the book of Daniel was written and the issues that need to be thought about when coming to a conclusion on this issue.
For more from Dr. Heiser:
nakedbiblepodc...
drmsh.com
![Chlöe - Shake (Feat. Jeremih) [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aDs_1ufpfv8/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for the videos brother
Best stance! That is how a scholar should teach!
Salutări și aprecieri din România 🙋🇷🇴👍😊
multumes si salutari din california!
Daniel mentioned the chief eunuch, and archeology has uncovered this person in the Nebo-Sarsekim Tablet that confirms the biblical person and also affirms the title, Chief Eunuch, used in Daniel 1:3. Also, Ezekiel 14:14 mentions Daniel by name.....so wouldn't that imply that Daniel lives during Ezekiel's time?
Yes, Daniel lived during the same period as Ezekiel. The question being explored is when the book of Daniel was written.
@@AsTheChaosDies It is interesting. My question would be, how would a second century writer know the name of the chief eunuch of a court in Babylon from 4 centuries prior?
That would be evidence for the early date of authorship. Similar to Daniel 5. How would the late date author have known that Belshazzar was second in command because his father was still alive but was not in Babylon at the time? And on the other side, how would the early author be writing apocalyptic literature so early? That’s why there is the debate. Good scholars on both sides as well.
I'm puzzled by the argument that you make in this video, or that Christians who want to believe it is all true. You seem to be saying that all of Daniel 11 is true, not only the parts predicting the events of 175BC-165 BC (Daniel 11:5-39) that actually happened as Daniel "prophesied", but then the parts that he prophesied in verses 40-45 (which didn't match history at all) just haven't come true yet. Those verses prophesy that Antiochus would conquer most of North Africa, but he didn't. How could he do that in the future if he died 2100 years ago? Those verses also prophesy that Antiochus would die in Palestine, which he didn't, but are they suggesting that Antiochus would someday raise from the dead and then die again in Palestine? This line of reasoning, that Daniel 11:40-45 is future prophecy doesn't hold any water. It is much more likely that the entire book was written in the year 165 during the Maccabean revolt by somebody trying to encourage the Jews with a fake prophecy. Funny how people keep using old "prophecies" to try to start new religions. It is likely that this prophesy itself was used to launch Christianity.
Daniel mentioned the chief eunuch, and archeology has uncovered this person in the Nebo-Sarsekim Tablet that confirms the biblical person and also affirms the title, Chief Eunuch, used in Daniel 1:3. Also, Ezekiel 14:14 mentions Daniel by name.....so wouldn't that imply that Daniel lives during Ezekiel's time?