I love this video, you explained it so clearly (in my opinion), and it did clear up the things like successor vs. feasible successor (now I know the difference)... Really Thank You!
As Joe mentions all the EIGRP routes get throw into the topology table and the router uses the formula: Metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256-Load) + (K3*Delay)*(K5/(Reliability + K4))) to determine composite metric. It compares them and the lowest CM wins and is put into the routing table, the successor route. By changing K values such as bandwidth or delay you can alter the results of the formula. If a nonsuccessor routes RD is less then the FD, the route is a feasible successor route.
i'm into my CCNP stydies so maybe after i will get CCNP route cerified i will be able to understand who become feasible successor... i will comment... when i will.. ;-)
I love this video, you explained it so clearly (in my opinion), and it did clear up the things like successor vs. feasible successor (now I know the difference)...
Really Thank You!
brilliant video. thanks
As Joe mentions all the EIGRP routes get throw into the topology table and the router uses the formula: Metric = 256*((K1*Bw) + (K2*Bw)/(256-Load) + (K3*Delay)*(K5/(Reliability + K4))) to determine composite metric. It compares them and the lowest CM wins and is put into the routing table, the successor route. By changing K values such as bandwidth or delay you can alter the results of the formula. If a nonsuccessor routes RD is less then the FD, the route is a feasible successor route.
Great!
Good for clarification :)
i'm into my CCNP stydies so maybe after i will get CCNP route cerified i will be able to understand who become feasible successor... i will comment... when i will.. ;-)
Hi.. i watched your video... i like it but i still don't get how to understand witch router will become feasible successor??
can u tell where are u doing these practicals
which simulation programm are u using ?
thnx nice technique of explainat^n