Hi! Wonderful patches, congratulations! Are they played chronologically? If not how to chose between volume 1 & 2 if we do not have the detail of each volume?
Just installed these and they sound amazing. I was disapointed with 80% of the factory patches and these really show off what the UBXa is capable of. Well done. Get both packs!
Some excellent patches, all of them demo'd by someone not just with technical chops but also a high degree of 'feel' for what they're playing. [Apart from that tune at 15:54 demo'ing the "Analog Piano" patch! Eeuurrgghh!!!] I really should've practised more as a kid and then my UB-Xa might sound a l'il bit more like this! This video really should silence - once and for all - the naysayers and Big B haters out there and their overly-negative comments about this instrument. Cheers, Stefano.
These patches are incredible!!!! I was considering returning my UB-Xa D until I tried these... now its my favorite synth. Almost every patch is keeper and most have extras like poly-AT controlled vibrato (my favorite!). Thanks so much for these!
Thank you for the wonderful music. I listened to it like an album of musical miniatures. You have excellent taste, each sound has a suitable miniature. Berlinger owes you buyers of an excellent instrument!!!
I have installed them today. Really enjoy to play them. Love the subtleties in the velocity attacks and the aftertouch. We will use a lot of them on stage.
PS: на самом деле, я восхищён самим музыкантом. Очень немногим удаётся уговорить, заставить любой инструмент зазвучать красиво, дорого. У этого маэстро вкусно звучит четвёртый "китаец". И да: в каждом, даже самом дорогом синтезаторе 98% патчей просто беспооезный напорнитель, видимость богатого разнообразия.В Оберхайме есть пяток роскошных патчей, и маэстро их продемонстрировал. Лайк.
Ho appena acquistato e installato le tue patches sui miei Ub xa. Sono di gran lunga migliori di molte altre che si ascoltano in giro. Davvero un ottimo lavoro Stefano, complimenti. 🎼
The UBXa in your hands sounds fantastic. Behringer haters should watch this video. Not that it would help any but the truth about how great the UBxa is will at least be undeniable.
@teamcoalhapcharcoal No S**t, but there are way more people who like them for making affordable gear. It's amazing how people whine about knockoffs and yet buy Chinese knock off products all day from Amazon and Walmart yet there is no outrage. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
This is amazing!! 😃 I didn't know how beautiful a synth can sound (and so masterfully be played)! Unfortunately there's not enough room in my (living-room-) studio for the Behringer UB-XA, otherwise I'd definetly consider ordering it plus these awsome patches. Currently my only (and first) synth I own is an Arturia Minifreak. After listening to this beauty, I'm a bit afraid to turn on my Minifreak again, I might be disappointed. I was considerung to get an Oberheim TEO-5 as an alternative (which still fits into my small studio). If you would create a simlar patch-bank for the TEO-5, the decision would be easy... 😉
I was thinking the same with not having enough room for another synth keyboard, but now that Behringer has brought out the desktop version I think I could squeeze that in.
I'm very experienced with Oberheim equipment & that's probably the first time having heard that the UB-Xa could actually make sense, less as an OB imitator than as an instrument in its own right. Though it has almost all OB8's Page 2 parameters, it however seems that primarily the mod matrix & MPE are determining its independence. Other instr. managed the OB-gliss better, but some of the sounds presented here show the UB-Xa makes sense in its own fields.
I totally agree with you. The UBX-a is a very good synth. It looks like an OBX-a, the patch structure is exactly the same, but sincerely it does not sound exactly as an Oberheim (I had owned an OBX-a for many years). However, also thanks to its modulation matrix and its built-in keyboard offering polyphonic AT, it is a very good synth at a very convenient price, capable to do several things that the OBX-a was not able to do. About the MPE, unfortunately its current MPE implementation is not compatible for playing it from the Osmose keyboard.
@@stefanodaino THX! Good to know that it's unfortunately not compatible with the marvellous Osmose kb Have you told or conmented that on Behringer's fb page? Unfortunately the last 7 years Behringer has become that huge that getting in touch with them on other ways has become next to impossible. They definitely should focus on important updates/upgrades first & then continue their incredible clone marathon.
This is an EXCELLENT demo of this synthesizer, thank you very much. I'm curious how you feel about the build quality. I've been interested in this one, though I've never bought a Behringer before, having heard a lot of negativity around them, which has largely made me apprehensive about it. But, I really REALLY want one of these, so I'm curious about your take on it. Are you happy with the build quality? Thanks again for this demo, it's really beautiful.
Thank you for your kind words. The build quality is very good, I can say. I prefer the keyboards by Fatar which you find - among the others - on Sequential synths, but this keyboard has the added value of the PolyAT and - btw - it has very good response as well. The knobs are of very good quality s well as all the rest. The only thing I would really change is the display, it's completely unreadable as soon as you move even slightly from its vertical...
Ciao Stefano. Dopo aver installato le patches mi sono reso conto che non riesco a trovare quella denominata "Choir" ( per intenderci quella che si ascolta al minuto 4:34). Ho fatto qualche errore io nel trasferimento del file sysex? Da premettere che non la trovo in tutte e due le installazioni sui miei Ubxa. Se puoi fammi sapere qualcosa. Grazie
In the archive there are some sysex files and a pdf explaining how to load the files on a MIDI sequencer or a sysex librarian (there are a couple available for free for Windows and MacOS), and transfer the patches to your UBX-a after connecting it to your computer by USB or MIDI. BTW, if you need assistance, do not hesitate to write to me at support@dsp-quattro.com.
Good question... it depends on the money you have to spend, I would say. The UB-Xa has several added values respect the PRO-800. Among the others, a 61 Keyboard with polyAT, 2 times the voices which can be spread for making impressive stereo patches, a powerful matrix modulation which allows organic and dynamic sound landscapes. The PRO-800 is really very great synth for its price, cost very much less, it plays great and does most of the things you are looking for when playing an analog polyphonic synth...
@@stefanodaino Great thanks! Is this Valhala reverb any responsible for stereo-rizing beautifully or stereo voice spread comes from UBXa naturally? Do you have Atrophy on to make it more vintage in your presets? First time (listening many presentations) I hear from yours what I like - when UBXa sounds not sterile.
@@samprockthe stereo panning and chorus-like fx is done only by the UBXa. Atrophy setting is the factory default. I have used the built-in UBXa modulation matrix to add dynamic movements to voices and the possibility of panning to recreate the ambisonic effect.
@@stefanodainoThat’s what I was looking for, thanks for explaining how you’ve done it! Really gives it character in making spaces and scapes, without just blending it all.
Hi; A fairly basic question: do these patches function (and sound) the same on the UB-XA D? I'm about to pull the trigger on the desktop model, but want to ensure these (beautiful) patches will work as expected.
Yes they do. I use a velocity curve which allows the full range for the dynamic, maybe you need to check the velocity curve of your external controller. Please also consider that all my patches use the polyAT feature of the UB-Xa keyboard. There might be some small differences if you will use an external keyboard controller which transmit the channel and not the poly AT.
No, it does not. There are new features and options, but fortunately the defaults values in firmware v2 are keeping the compatibility with previous patches, which play identical.
Great playing and a nice synth. But, it seems a little suited to making elevator music. It's a little ho hum to my ear, yet wonderful at the same time.
@@frankweber356 It’s not about being better or cheaper😂 It’s about what somebody wants. If you want something physical to play a VST won’t do it for you. It’s that simple lol… The biggest difference between an synth and a plugin are not the functions smh 🤦♂️ One is simply physical and the other is digital. Let people enjoy what they want and don’t be blobbing out your opinion which offers no real value.
@@scrubsjl1 ) If you want something physical, go and buy something good. 2 ) Saving money is a value to offer 3 ) I am not blobbing, i am telling openly my opinion 4 ) Accept other opinions, not only Fan-Hype- Comments. We are still living in a open minded world. Go ahead and don´t waste my time. I´ll stop here answering posts, which offer no value at all.
And an orchestra as well. And a real trumpeteer , and violonist also. And another synth also, and a piano. A radio maybe even better; Guess what ; they are all intended to make music with or on. That's the secret.
The "OBX" tag is indeed a bit misleading since this instrument is not a clone of the OB-X (therefore it can only halfway sound like one). Behringer is working on an OB-X clone at the moment (with discrete components) but it is still in prototype status.
These patches sound identical when loaded into a UB-Xa (with either firmware version 1 or version 2) and the expander module UB-Xa D.
But now with the ability to save atrophy settings with them😊
Hi! Wonderful patches, congratulations! Are they played chronologically? If not how to chose between volume 1 & 2 if we do not have the detail of each volume?
@@Batteruno45 no, they are not. Please send to me an email to support@dsp-quattro.com to have the two lists.
Finally, a UB-Xa demo by a real musician, and with technical chops!
Best demo of this synth on RUclips. You really make it sing.
Just installed these and they sound amazing. I was disapointed with 80% of the factory patches and these really show off what the UBXa is capable of. Well done. Get both packs!
Wow. Beautiful playing and the best patches for the UB-Xa I have heard so far. Well done!
Thanks for a great demo of superb patches… And superb performance!
Some excellent patches, all of them demo'd by someone not just with technical chops but also a high degree of 'feel' for what they're playing.
[Apart from that tune at 15:54 demo'ing the "Analog Piano" patch! Eeuurrgghh!!!]
I really should've practised more as a kid and then my UB-Xa might sound a l'il bit more like this!
This video really should silence - once and for all - the naysayers and Big B haters out there and their overly-negative comments about this instrument.
Cheers, Stefano.
Programming is an art, playing is another. Cool demo!
Ordering the Desktop when it's back in stock! Fantastic demo.🔥
These patches are incredible!!!! I was considering returning my UB-Xa D until I tried these... now its my favorite synth. Almost every patch is keeper and most have extras like poly-AT controlled vibrato (my favorite!). Thanks so much for these!
The playing on "Dynamic Poly A" was beautiful. Well done on these patches.
Thank you for the wonderful music. I listened to it like an album of musical miniatures. You have excellent taste, each sound has a suitable miniature. Berlinger owes you buyers of an excellent instrument!!!
You made that UB-Xa sing all the bells and whistles I needed to hear. I'll be getting one soon. Great video. 👍👍👍👍👍
Really great set of patches! Awesome playing as well!
Nice! I like your 80's reference plays! Holding Back the Years :)
pretty awesome that you manage to get such a broad spectrum of sounds out of such a simple synth. That takes talent I suppose :) Awesome playing too!
I have installed them today. Really enjoy to play them. Love the subtleties in the velocity attacks and the aftertouch. We will use a lot of them on stage.
Love those patches. Finally someone who creates sounds which are actually playable in a live setup
PS: на самом деле, я восхищён самим музыкантом. Очень немногим удаётся уговорить, заставить любой инструмент зазвучать красиво, дорого. У этого маэстро вкусно звучит четвёртый "китаец". И да: в каждом, даже самом дорогом синтезаторе 98% патчей просто беспооезный напорнитель, видимость богатого разнообразия.В Оберхайме есть пяток роскошных патчей, и маэстро их продемонстрировал. Лайк.
This sounds amazing! And what a treat it is to watch a video of someone who can play well.💪👍
Wow! Your excellent sounds make me want to buy a UB-Xa!
Strings and Sweep are very very good !
Ho appena acquistato e installato le tue patches sui miei Ub xa. Sono di gran lunga migliori di molte altre che si ascoltano in giro. Davvero un ottimo lavoro Stefano, complimenti. 🎼
This is a really crazy piece of work. wtf sweet sound
Today with them formally announcing the UB-Xa Desktop I hope loads find this video the sounds are lush
Thanks for your playing and the wonderful sounds all I can say is wow😮
Some very nice sounds in there.
The UBXa in your hands sounds fantastic. Behringer haters should watch this video. Not that it would help any but the truth about how great the UBxa is will at least be undeniable.
@teamcoalhapcharcoal schlubbed
@teamcoalhapcharcoal No S**t, but there are way more people who like them for making affordable gear. It's amazing how people whine about knockoffs and yet buy Chinese knock off products all day from Amazon and Walmart yet there is no outrage. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Behringer frees the synth , news at 10
@teamcoalhapcharcoalVST’s are knock-offs too.
@teamcoalhapcharcoal Lots of them are. 🙂
25:48...stairway to heaven, 7:00: Birdland..8:14 the great gig in the sky
@@cosmojairzinho14 yes!
Ok yeah, all the people bashing this need to see this demo. Those strings at the start are awesome!
Whats that clicking Sound when a note is played …13:33 min in?????
Nice collection of patches and great playing! I was thinking about getting the module, but I might need to get the keyboard version for aftertouch.
Desktop module has poly touch as well
@@INeedsMoneysYes, but than You need a controler that supports poly at
You matches the sounds with your finger technics. Great.
Great playing and great sounds.
you play very very well
Very musical playing skills and great patches. I'd love to hear you make a soundset for the Gforce OB-X software!
Legend of 1900 - WOW
all great patches, but you really sold me with the lyle mayes
Nice jams !!
I really really enjoy that Harmonica patch
Cute that your cat appears at 11 minutes!
yes, she is Lince! 😻
Bello sto Synt :-)
This is amazing!! 😃
I didn't know how beautiful a synth can sound (and so masterfully be played)!
Unfortunately there's not enough room in my (living-room-) studio for the Behringer UB-XA, otherwise I'd definetly consider ordering it plus these awsome patches. Currently my only (and first) synth I own is an Arturia Minifreak. After listening to this beauty, I'm a bit afraid to turn on my Minifreak again, I might be disappointed.
I was considerung to get an Oberheim TEO-5 as an alternative (which still fits into my small studio).
If you would create a simlar patch-bank for the TEO-5, the decision would be easy... 😉
I was thinking the same with not having enough room for another synth keyboard, but now that Behringer has brought out the desktop version I think I could squeeze that in.
The amazing results when someone who actually plays the keys gets an expressive instrument.
The very first patch demo'd immediately made me think of Funeral for a Friend
Some nice Lyle Mays and Chick Corea riffs at the end there.
I'm very experienced with Oberheim equipment & that's probably the first time having heard that the UB-Xa could actually make sense, less as an OB imitator than as an instrument in its own right. Though it has almost all OB8's Page 2 parameters, it however seems that primarily the mod matrix & MPE are determining its independence. Other instr. managed the OB-gliss better, but some of the sounds presented here show the UB-Xa makes sense in its own fields.
I totally agree with you. The UBX-a is a very good synth. It looks like an OBX-a, the patch structure is exactly the same, but sincerely it does not sound exactly as an Oberheim (I had owned an OBX-a for many years). However, also thanks to its modulation matrix and its built-in keyboard offering polyphonic AT, it is a very good synth at a very convenient price, capable to do several things that the OBX-a was not able to do. About the MPE, unfortunately its current MPE implementation is not compatible for playing it from the Osmose keyboard.
@@stefanodaino THX! Good to know that it's unfortunately not compatible with the marvellous Osmose kb Have you told or conmented that on Behringer's fb page? Unfortunately the last 7 years Behringer has become that huge that getting in touch with them on other ways has become next to impossible. They definitely should focus on important updates/upgrades first & then continue their incredible clone marathon.
Sounds great! I noticed you hash-tagged the OBX, but the OB-X used a different filter than the Xa, so they wouldn’t sound the same.
Nice reverb
That Horn piano patch 😮
how pleasant , nice to hear debussy on this.
nice!
Nice
This is an EXCELLENT demo of this synthesizer, thank you very much.
I'm curious how you feel about the build quality. I've been interested in this one, though I've never bought a Behringer before, having heard a lot of negativity around them, which has largely made me apprehensive about it.
But, I really REALLY want one of these, so I'm curious about your take on it. Are you happy with the build quality?
Thanks again for this demo, it's really beautiful.
Thank you for your kind words. The build quality is very good, I can say. I prefer the keyboards by Fatar which you find - among the others - on Sequential synths, but this keyboard has the added value of the PolyAT and - btw - it has very good response as well. The knobs are of very good quality s well as all the rest. The only thing I would really change is the display, it's completely unreadable as soon as you move even slightly from its vertical...
I suspect you'd make any instrument shine, but credit to the OBehrheim that you found enough in it to care.
This is heckin based as heck
Very nice! Please can you perform some demos were you tweak some knobs 🤔
Fantastic demonstration!!!! Is this the inbuilt sounds????
no, they are custom patches, they are available at www.dsp-quattro.com/dspquattro/Site/dsp-soundlibraries.html
Totale 💣
2:17 🥰🥰
Ciao Stefano. Dopo aver installato le patches mi sono reso conto che non riesco a trovare quella denominata "Choir" ( per intenderci quella che si ascolta al minuto 4:34). Ho fatto qualche errore io nel trasferimento del file sysex? Da premettere che non la trovo in tutte e due le installazioni sui miei Ubxa. Se puoi fammi sapere qualcosa. Grazie
Ciao Edoardo, è stata rinominata "SD-Carpet-1" ed è la numero 84 del Vol-2...
@@stefanodaino ok grazie mille Stefano.
Trumpet preset along with poly aftertouch is sublime...extends far from conventional "synth" experience.
yea but how do you load the files on to the ub xa
In the archive there are some sysex files and a pdf explaining how to load the files on a MIDI sequencer or a sysex librarian (there are a couple available for free for Windows and MacOS), and transfer the patches to your UBX-a after connecting it to your computer by USB or MIDI. BTW, if you need assistance, do not hesitate to write to me at support@dsp-quattro.com.
@@stefanodaino what archive
can you just give me a link to the archive
@@stefanodaino ive been at this for hours it should not be this hard i just need a little instruction i have midi ox
Hi Stefano is there any chance that you create more sounds for this instrument?
Great sounds; did you get a chance to compare the UB-Xa to the TEO-5?
I like your cat
😻
I gotta ask. Between the Pro-800 and this. Which would you go for first?
Good question... it depends on the money you have to spend, I would say. The UB-Xa has several added values respect the PRO-800. Among the others, a 61 Keyboard with polyAT, 2 times the voices which can be spread for making impressive stereo patches, a powerful matrix modulation which allows organic and dynamic sound landscapes. The PRO-800 is really very great synth for its price, cost very much less, it plays great and does most of the things you are looking for when playing an analog polyphonic synth...
@stefanodaino that's a good summary. I only have a mono jack unfilled. Lol. So whatever I get it will be in mono. 😖
Great playing! No FX here?
@@samprock no fx except the reverb, which is the Plate Reverb by Valhalla.
@@stefanodaino Great thanks! Is this Valhala reverb any responsible for stereo-rizing beautifully or stereo voice spread comes from UBXa naturally? Do you have Atrophy on to make it more vintage in your presets?
First time (listening many presentations) I hear from yours what I like - when UBXa sounds not sterile.
@@samprockthe stereo panning and chorus-like fx is done only by the UBXa. Atrophy setting is the factory default. I have used the built-in UBXa modulation matrix to add dynamic movements to voices and the possibility of panning to recreate the ambisonic effect.
@@stefanodainoThat’s what I was looking for, thanks for explaining how you’ve done it! Really gives it character in making spaces and scapes, without just blending it all.
grazie per questo demo, thanks for sharing, i subscribe to your channel
Obehringheim
Hi; A fairly basic question: do these patches function (and sound) the same on the UB-XA D? I'm about to pull the trigger on the desktop model, but want to ensure these (beautiful) patches will work as expected.
Yes they do. I use a velocity curve which allows the full range for the dynamic, maybe you need to check the velocity curve of your external controller. Please also consider that all my patches use the polyAT feature of the UB-Xa keyboard. There might be some small differences if you will use an external keyboard controller which transmit the channel and not the poly AT.
Il mio Juno60 tira fuori dei suoni 100 volte più belli di questa carcassa della behringer!
Sounds amazing. But I think the reverb you have put om makes it even better. What kind og reverb is it? Is it other effects in use?
I saw you mentioned the reverb longer down. Thanks. Is The Ultimate Vintage Collection the same as The Ultimate Analog Collection?
@@SigurdSalvesen Yes it is!
Хочу тебя обрадовать, дорогой: у нас от него будет ребёнок! Вариант-2 - ...у нас от него никогда не будет ребёнка!😅 Привет из России/Советского Союза
the patches sounds good. what effects was used in this patches?
It's the Valhalla Plate Reverb plug-in.
che effetto hai usato per il riverbero?
E’ il Plate Reverb di Valhalla
Synths tend to sound similar , yet they differ. Ask Moog.
Is there a dry version?
Idk for sure but the effects are probably on-board the unit
@@chriskellenmurphy The unit has no effects. The player added some reverb.
@@newignis whoops I thought I was commenting on the TEO-5! My bad
I guess Update 2.0 affects things, a bit … ?
No, it does not. There are new features and options, but fortunately the defaults values in firmware v2 are keeping the compatibility with previous patches, which play identical.
A lot of spatial effects
Der Synthi klingt nicht besonders gut😢
Great playing and a nice synth. But, it seems a little suited to making elevator music. It's a little ho hum to my ear, yet wonderful at the same time.
a lot of them sound the same
Low output as all Behringer products. Any Plugin will do as well.
Then buy a plugin…😂
@@scrubsjl Of course, it´s better and cheaper !!🤓
@@frankweber356 It’s not about being better or cheaper😂 It’s about what somebody wants. If you want something physical to play a VST won’t do it for you. It’s that simple lol…
The biggest difference between an synth and a plugin are not the functions smh 🤦♂️ One is simply physical and the other is digital.
Let people enjoy what they want and don’t be blobbing out your opinion which offers no real value.
@@scrubsjl1 ) If you want something physical, go and buy something good. 2 ) Saving money is a value to offer 3 ) I am not blobbing, i am telling openly my opinion 4 ) Accept other opinions, not only Fan-Hype- Comments. We are still living in a open minded world. Go ahead and don´t waste my time. I´ll stop here answering posts, which offer no value at all.
And an orchestra as well. And a real trumpeteer , and violonist also. And another synth also, and a piano. A radio maybe even better; Guess what ; they are all intended to make music with or on. That's the secret.
Sound of the Ubxa is mehh, good patches
It's an analog beast, sounds incredible, yet you made that troll of a comment. Dude...
-1 all these patches sound alike, and none like an #obx, delete them tags
The "OBX" tag is indeed a bit misleading since this instrument is not a clone of the OB-X (therefore it can only halfway sound like one). Behringer is working on an OB-X clone at the moment (with discrete components) but it is still in prototype status.
Your ears gotta be fked if all those patches sound similar to you💀
I recommend seeing a doctor or not commenting on music😂