good luck, I will say this , to work i believe we would agree it must be the same way for all 12, and with that no "extra" rules to make it work. Oh and the cities have no bearing, the book states to match up first then leads you to a location of a casque, so matching of the 12. you can use number however you wish, but the method should be the same for all. I say look at the September (9) painting, start there, see what you can determine as a method, to whatever verse you end up, then the same for the rest by the same rules you choose to decide upon... if he verse and the painting via any numbers method you choose, even if comes out differently than thought now, then all will have to work out to one to one ...12. with 3 already well confirmed. AND last point, if you believe that the Japanese translator is correct vis BP said...then you sort of have to believe it all true, yes? he didn't make a mistake and mean paintings, it says poems. it said numbers , so it must be correct, yes? I say again good luck.
Interesting ideas, I like your spreadsheets, I do notice that you have included numbers 9,8,2 for verse 1 and not 4 and 3 which are also mentioned in the poem, I think you would have to use all if you are to find some sort of code, or it becomes arbitary and defeats the point, i feel.
I only included the numbers that are mentioned in the poems, because of the lat and long in the paintings, but I will now make a column for numbers in the paintings. It didn't occur to me.
@@user-os7ec4dm8x Exactly my point above, If you are using a "rule" taking the number in a verse, then you should use all that are numbers, 3 4 9 8 2 , if then you decide a word like [first] or [twice] is considered a number also, then it goes for all the times used. If not a consistent method, using the same criteria and "rules" then it simple becomes a stretch and making it work no matter what. This has all been done before, many ways and many ways of thinking and making it work, but it becomes a stretchy and bunch of odd assumptive rules used at times but not all the time. The Matching is supposed done, first, before you guess or decide on any city/place. on page 7, you could have jumped to" The Treasure" section and started trying to match, It doesn't say you need any other part to "Wed, Match, Pair" them. Just a need to decipher the clues in them to get a set. That is words to image. verse to picture in colorlight. Do all the number things you think, but so far nothing has done the trick, because someday the realization that there is no number method, but was simple BP words with a JJP visual object. just saying folks.
@@user-os7ec4dm8xThanks. I guess I may have missed those. I will go back and check. I abandoned using the numbers in the poems, though. My theory is only based on the number of lines of each poem.
good luck, I will say this , to work i believe we would agree it must be the same way for all 12, and with that no "extra" rules to make it work. Oh and the cities have no bearing, the book states to match up first then leads you to a location of a casque, so matching of the 12. you can use number however you wish, but the method should be the same for all. I say look at the September (9) painting, start there, see what you can determine as a method, to whatever verse you end up, then the same for the rest by the same rules you choose to decide upon... if he verse and the painting via any numbers method you choose, even if comes out differently than thought now, then all will have to work out to one to one ...12. with 3 already well confirmed. AND last point, if you believe that the Japanese translator is correct vis BP said...then you sort of have to believe it all true, yes? he didn't make a mistake and mean paintings, it says poems. it said numbers , so it must be correct, yes? I say again good luck.
Interesting ideas, I like your spreadsheets, I do notice that you have included numbers 9,8,2 for verse 1 and not 4 and 3 which are also mentioned in the poem, I think you would have to use all if you are to find some sort of code, or it becomes arbitary and defeats the point, i feel.
I only included the numbers that are mentioned in the poems, because of the lat and long in the paintings, but I will now make a column for numbers in the paintings. It didn't occur to me.
@@EncompassingChaos6 I meant 4 as in 'four alike' and 3 as in 'three winged and slight'
@@user-os7ec4dm8x Exactly my point above, If you are using a "rule" taking the number in a verse, then you should use all that are numbers, 3 4 9 8 2 , if then you decide a word like [first] or [twice] is considered a number also, then it goes for all the times used. If not a consistent method, using the same criteria and "rules" then it simple becomes a stretch and making it work no matter what. This has all been done before, many ways and many ways of thinking and making it work, but it becomes a stretchy and bunch of odd assumptive rules used at times but not all the time. The Matching is supposed done, first, before you guess or decide on any city/place. on page 7, you could have jumped to" The Treasure" section and started trying to match, It doesn't say you need any other part to "Wed, Match, Pair" them. Just a need to decipher the clues in them to get a set. That is words to image. verse to picture in colorlight. Do all the number things you think, but so far nothing has done the trick, because someday the realization that there is no number method, but was simple BP words with a JJP visual object. just saying folks.
@@user-os7ec4dm8xThanks. I guess I may have missed those. I will go back and check. I abandoned using the numbers in the poems, though. My theory is only based on the number of lines of each poem.
maybe these will help: 4 8 15 16 23 42