We need essentials to live so you are an essential worker !!! Risk your life to provide it !! Ok the pandemic is over peasant get back to work for wages that a human cant live on.
And then they made it about race… and all the suckers fell for it and nothing happened after that, hey, I need healthcare for my kids… Democrats.. shut up you racist piece of crap look at the poor Black people😂😂😂 and Bernie got bullied by them. He was like a deer in the headlights.
You're suffering from selection bias. Plenty of people have agreed and been aware. You're only going to hear responses from the people who disagree so it makes it seem like you're yelling into the void of never ending idiocy.
The bottem 50% do the hardest shtiest type of work, for lowest wages. Extremly relevant, and pertanent to the tax discussion. Especially when they are underpaid and exploited, where the wealth they create flows up into the hands of the conniving corporate-freeloader class.
"This level income equality is usually self-correcting. The bad news is the means of self-correction are typically war, famine, or revolution." Whew, that was a mouthful! A storm is coming...
What I would like to know is when going from 500 billionaires to 2500 billionaires, how many of the NEW billionaires were related to the pre-existing billionaires? I think that would be telling.
Politicians have only focused on financing their campaigns ever since Citizens United was created in 2015. Billionaires will have no problem buying less than 2-term politicians. The first step in reducing inequality starts with removing Citizens United. Then rewrite the tax code.
When a game of monopoly is finished, we start it all over. Like the game, when there will be a few billionaires and no one to buy, we will have to restart the system all over again, as we did with the new deal. New deal 2.0.
Makes you wonder what his agenda is? Scott’s incredibly wealthy himself. I appreciate his rhetoric, but having a hundred millionaire on your side is never free.
@@TravY2J He can see the pitchforks coming at his gated community,but also he sees this in the end will be bad for everyone.He is sounding the alarm at least.
Occupy Wall Street the main movement to protest income inequality, but eventually the oligarch put pressure on the mayors to send in the jack boots in riot gear to break it up.
You have to really dig to find someone to make proposals. Economist Dean Baker is one guy. But you won't see him being interviewed on Morning Joe or CNN or TYT.
Ok, hold on, hold on. Going from 500 to 2500 for a net increase of 2000 people is the 'fastest growing demographic' over the past 10 years. How many more homeless or bankrupt people have there been in that time? I'm willing to bet a lot more than 2000....
500% of 500 < 0.2% of 340,000,000 The number of homeless literally increased by hundreds of thousands of people. And that's in just 1 year. -- The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) today released its 2024 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report: Part 1: Point-in-Time Estimates, an annual snapshot of the number of individuals in shelters, temporary housing, and unsheltered settings. The report found more than 770,000 people were experiencing homelessness on a single night in January 2024, an 18% increase from 2023.
How so many people can get robbed, right in front of their eyes, and not figure out the people robbing them are the ones who wound up with all the money is wild, lol.
The capital class (people who earn money via long-term asset investment). This subset of the American propulation includes all billionaires, many millionaires, and even CEOs who have learned to take the lion's share of their compensation as stock options instead of salary. To the untrained eye, there is no difference between salary income and stock options. However, they are taxed very differently. Salary income is classified as "ordinary income" for tax purposes. The gain on stock options, if held for more than a year, is taxed as a "long-time capital gain." Ordinary income is subject to progressive taxation. Most Americans know progressive taxation as the "tax brackets." On the other hand, long-term capital gains are taxed at a maximum rate of 20% (20 cents on a dollar earned) and Trump wants to lower that rate to 15% (15 cents on a dollar earned), regardless of how much long-term capital gains are realized in a calendar year. This difference means that a member of the capital class earning $1M in long-term capital gains is subject to almost half the amount of a worker earning a $1M in ordinary income (the top tax rate on ordinary income is 37% or 37 cents on a dollar earned). This type of taxation where income derived from long-term capital investment is taxed at a lower rate than income earned via work is known as supply-side economics. Reagan called it "trickle down" economics when he first introduced supply-side economics to Americans. The promise was that if we gave long-term capital investment preferential tax treatment, then the capital class would invest the gains in American businesses, which would create new jobs. Basically, a larger amount of the cost of government would be shifted onto the backs of workers, but they would be paid better. However, that was before Jack Welch stated that no job is an American job. That is why he is know as "Neutron" Jack. He was famous for outsourcing GE, leaving once full buildings empty. I want to bring something to light something for which most people are unaware. Reagan's tax cuts for the rich were in a large part covered by his increase in the FICA (Social Security} tax rate. I worked at the Social Security Administration for 6 years (2 years as a contractor and two years as an employee before leaving) as a computer scientist on the Re-Engineered Disability Process. At that point, due to Reagan's FICA tax increase, the Social Security Trust Fund was the largest holder of federal debt. The capital class became immensely wealthy because of preferential tax treatment whose deficit was partially covered by over funding of the Social Security Trust Fund (FICA receipts have been commingled with general revenues to help cover the deficit since the Johnson Administration). If the capital class is successful at killing Social Security, FICA payments will become little more than a backdoor income tax for those who have already paid into to the system. Remember, FICA is a payroll tax, not an income tax. One has to be on someone's payroll to pay it. The billionaires and many milllionaires do not pay FICA because their income is derived from long-term capital investment and long-term capital gains are not subject to the FICA tax. If we want to fix Social Security, we need to subject long-term capital gains to the same 15% (split between the employer and employee or paid in full by the self-employed) and remove the income cap. Workers are taking home 15% less money because of FICA. If FICA did not need to be withheld, most employers could afford to give employees a 15% pay raise. The real reason the GOP has such a hard-on for the Affordable Care Act has nothing to do with healthcare. It has to do with a tax provision buried in the text that subjects long-term capital gains to the Medicare tax for the first time since the creation of the program. With the lion's share of the growth in GDP accruing to capital instead of work, removing Medicare taxation on long-term capital gains would lead to the end of Medicare as an even larger percentage of our GDP is captured by the capital class. I believe that Brian Thompson was just the beginning. If the members of the capital class are not afraid, then they are incredibly stupid. We just went through twenty years of war that resulted in a metric truck load of combat veterans who know what it is like to be in a wartime fire fight. These people will not freeze up after shots ring out. The body guards that the capital class hire will not stand a chance against a determined squad of combat veterans (I am a veteran too). Hopefully, we do not get to that point. We can accomplish the same thing via boycotts and peaceful resistance (most of Musk's wealth is tied up in Tesla, so that is good place to start with our boycott). There are 330 million Americans. If we can just come together we can shut this nonsense down, united we stand. Finally, racism was the first divide-and-conquer scheme employed by what was then the capital class; namely, the English gentry. It was the result of former indentured Europeans and Africans challenging the gentry for power during Bacon's Rebellion in 1676. Regardless of what you have heard, perpetual slavery did not exist in the 17th century because no law existed to support it. Almost everyone and it was almost everyone who came to this continent before 1800 came here in bondage, regardless of race due to the fact that the colonies practiced the "headright" system. We referred to white bondage as "indentured servitude," but it was slavery by another name. If a person does not have the right to his/her labor, he/she is a slave. I learned that indentured servitude was not the benign practice we were taught in school while researching my family roots in Maryland and Virginia. The oldest ancestor (7th great-grandfather) that I have been able to identify came to the Maryland colony in bondage in the 1660s. Most indentured servants did not live long enough to see freedom during the 17th century, but he managed to do it (Google "Body in the Basement Leavy Neck Anne Arundel County). The assertion that indentured servants were not treated like chattel is false. During my research in the Maryland Archives, I saw probate court records where indentured servants were passed from father to child in bondage. Pre-United States colonial bondage has been incredibly white washed, so that wealthy white people in the American South could still get poor white people to affinity group with them instead of with poor black with whom they have more in common. This division of the poor, so that they would never unite and challenge the elite for control was the goal of the divide-and-conquer scheme we know as racism today. Before Bacon's Rebellion, colonists were referred by their country of origin, not their race. Interracial marriage was common before Bacon's Rebellion, so much so, that Virginia and Maryland had to enact anti-miscegenation (anti-interracial marriage) laws in 1691 and 1692, respectively. Let me ask you something; namely, when was the last time a government created a law for a non-existent practice? The laws were need to keep the races separate, so that they would not unite.
A society that allows billionaires is an unjust society. Unbridled capitalism is immoral. One who has a million dollars and wants more is (censored by yt.)
Yep. Love Trump or hate him. At least he busted up the Republican party and has run most of the old rusty status quo out of DC. More to come. Now we need the Dems to do the same. If only they had a candidate.
Such a smart comment from John. Every MSM talking head knows that they'll score points by saying that the rich have too much power. The question is whether they'll pressure anyone to do anything about it, and Joe never made this point when Democrats had any ability to do something about it. Now that Trump takes over next week, he can proudly talk about how broken everything is without actually threatening any of the levers of power. It's like the athlete who quits during every big game but has a million clever quotes in the offseason.
Galloway invested in the distressed assets of FTX as a vulture investor and stands to make tens of millions, so his alarm bells about the moneyed class are a bit. . . rich.
Wrong, it used to be about income inequality, and then the Democrats and the corporations made it about race? And the suckers went along with it so we lost a good 10 years with this BS and the people responsible that fell for it need to look in the mirror and sayI’m a jackass
If Americans went outside their bubble and found out the rest of the world have free healthcare across the board how would they react to living in the dark ages ?.
In Canada, the wait time for orthopedic surgery is well over a year. Ill stick with my employer sponsored plan where I can get everything taken care of when I want.
The failing of ALL these systems will lead to people marching in the streets. The “zombie apocalypse” will be regular people trying to get answers for all this madness
Nobody think about it this way. If you have one group paying a 40% tax rate, and another group paying a 10% tax rate. Of course government policy will work to increase cash flow through the hands of those paying 40%
To compare the rich to the poor. Let us talk about taking responsibility for our own lives. I don’t work a lot so I don’t make a lot. If you would put these people that are the working for in positions where they were more effective you would have a different result. Your raise will become effective when you become effective.
A bunch of unelected bureaucrats on one end, and a bunch of unelected oligarchs on the other end. In either extreme, everything is in the hands of the few. There is no difference.
Blame the wealthy for your problems? Go make your own money. Also, how does Trump trying to get the Panama Canal back, or work something out with Denmark over Greenland, affect his ability to make the cost of living go down. One is geopolitics and the other has more to do with the internal issues of our country. A president should be able to handle both.
Does Morning Joe in his Democratic Wolf's Clothing admit his part in this rampant corporate monopoly culture? He certainly helped by his attitude and news emphasized or hid.
If people don’t know by now, the legal path for change, will maybe move things an inch in years, while other problems keep growing. Jobs that are non-essential should be shut off and people should be fixing national scary issues fast.
Because they have next to no income. When they don't make enough for food and shelter, why would the government take even more? We could/ should be taxing the billionaires at substantially higher rates, and the tax burden could be reduced on everyone else. Reagan is the reason all of this changed- they used to be taxed substantially higher than they are now. Every low-income person that voted for Trump voted against their own interests
I too, have huge problems with MJ (some of them may be different than yours) but at this point this is not shocking views to appear on MJ, if you are going to be fair.
Scott Galloway does a better job verbalizing his positions without sounding like a total pocket watching grifter like you people are that’s why he is successful while you both have been on this network for years and no one knows your name still
I don't hate successful people, I hate people whos success is dependent on the failure of my fellow Americans.
Well said, Gravestone. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👍👍💯
@@gravestone4840 💯 %
We need essentials to live so you are an essential worker !!! Risk your life to provide it !! Ok the pandemic is over peasant get back to work for wages that a human cant live on.
Just say Bernie was right!
LOUDER for the people in the back!
Bernie Sanders has been telling you for YEARS that we’re becoming an oligarchy. Everyone acted like he was crazy. Pathetic to hear this now.
Cryptocracy, look it up. It's rule by a hidden oligarchy.
And then they made it about race… and all the suckers fell for it and nothing happened after that, hey, I need healthcare for my kids… Democrats.. shut up you racist piece of crap look at the poor Black people😂😂😂 and Bernie got bullied by them. He was like a deer in the headlights.
You're suffering from selection bias. Plenty of people have agreed and been aware. You're only going to hear responses from the people who disagree so it makes it seem like you're yelling into the void of never ending idiocy.
The bottem 50% do the hardest shtiest type of work, for lowest wages. Extremly relevant, and pertanent to the tax discussion. Especially when they are underpaid and exploited, where the wealth they create flows up into the hands of the conniving corporate-freeloader class.
Luigi Mangione will go down in history as the man who started the war against the billionaire class.
Please don't be giving scarborough credit. He is one of the most disingenuous corporate flunkies around.
"This level income equality is usually self-correcting. The bad news is the means of self-correction are typically war, famine, or revolution."
Whew, that was a mouthful! A storm is coming...
We aren’t moving towards an oligarchy, we are already there.
Scott Galloway should be in charge of something in government. Maybe the IRS
What I would like to know is when going from 500 billionaires to 2500 billionaires, how many of the NEW billionaires were related to the pre-existing billionaires? I think that would be telling.
TYT can you buy her a better camera and microphone please?
The American economy isn’t broken. It’s working as designed.
Thank you for covering this, much appreciated TYT and Yasmin and John
I wish people would stop blaming billionaires for politicians not doing their jobs. Let us start by stopping voting for 2-term politicians.
Politicians have only focused on financing their campaigns ever since Citizens United was created in 2015. Billionaires will have no problem buying less than 2-term politicians. The first step in reducing inequality starts with removing Citizens United. Then rewrite the tax code.
It's both the politicians and billionaires working in tandem that is the problem. They all carry blame for the crappy system were in.
When a game of monopoly is finished, we start it all over. Like the game, when there will be a few billionaires and no one to buy, we will have to restart the system all over again, as we did with the new deal. New deal 2.0.
That's what carbon credits are for. Next comes Global government and centralized digital currency.
@@WGAGENCY You are right Billionaires also destroy the environnement and do not want to implement any regulations to protect it…
I love this man. He is one of the only ones talking the truth.
Makes you wonder what his agenda is? Scott’s incredibly wealthy himself.
I appreciate his rhetoric, but having a hundred millionaire on your side is never free.
@@TravY2J He can see the pitchforks coming at his gated community,but also he sees this in the end will be bad for everyone.He is sounding the alarm at least.
I love Scott Galloway
I know he didn't like losing that bet he made on the election though
Occupy Wall Street the main movement to protest income inequality, but eventually the oligarch put pressure on the mayors to send in the jack boots in riot gear to break it up.
I didn't hear him give any answers of how to solve it
You have to really dig to find someone to make proposals. Economist Dean Baker is one guy. But you won't see him being interviewed on Morning Joe or CNN or TYT.
The Wealthy will own everything including you.
Democrats also under billionaires spell.
We need new leader BERNIE and AOC
Bernie is too old and AOC is too...female and Mexican.
I just want affordable healthcare, housing, and food. The billionair class wants more money and is careless about other people.
How is dental not medical, backwards bs
Ok, hold on, hold on. Going from 500 to 2500 for a net increase of 2000 people is the 'fastest growing demographic' over the past 10 years.
How many more homeless or bankrupt people have there been in that time? I'm willing to bet a lot more than 2000....
5 to 25 is 5x more. That's what he meant. The number of billionaires increased by 500%. The number of homeless people did not
500% of 500 < 0.2% of 340,000,000
The number of homeless literally increased by hundreds of thousands of people. And that's in just 1 year.
--
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) today released its 2024 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report: Part 1: Point-in-Time Estimates, an annual snapshot of the number of individuals in shelters, temporary housing, and unsheltered settings. The report found more than 770,000 people were experiencing homelessness on a single night in January 2024, an 18% increase from 2023.
The only way the free enterprise system works for Joe Blow is when there is competition.
How so many people can get robbed, right in front of their eyes, and not figure out the people robbing them are the ones who wound up with all the money is wild, lol.
Issue is wealth inequality, not income inequality
Huh? It’s the other way around. Income inequality leads to wealth inequality. Income inequality is the biggest driving factor.
Scott Galloway has been saying this for a long long time.
Hell yeah Scott. Corruption is the most important issue, as it makes every other issue worse.
Scott Galloway is the real deal. His podcast is incredible and a must listen
The capital class (people who earn money via long-term asset investment). This subset of the American propulation includes all billionaires, many millionaires, and even CEOs who have learned to take the lion's share of their compensation as stock options instead of salary. To the untrained eye, there is no difference between salary income and stock options. However, they are taxed very differently. Salary income is classified as "ordinary income" for tax purposes. The gain on stock options, if held for more than a year, is taxed as a "long-time capital gain." Ordinary income is subject to progressive taxation. Most Americans know progressive taxation as the "tax brackets." On the other hand, long-term capital gains are taxed at a maximum rate of 20% (20 cents on a dollar earned) and Trump wants to lower that rate to 15% (15 cents on a dollar earned), regardless of how much long-term capital gains are realized in a calendar year. This difference means that a member of the capital class earning $1M in long-term capital gains is subject to almost half the amount of a worker earning a $1M in ordinary income (the top tax rate on ordinary income is 37% or 37 cents on a dollar earned). This type of taxation where income derived from long-term capital investment is taxed at a lower rate than income earned via work is known as supply-side economics. Reagan called it "trickle down" economics when he first introduced supply-side economics to Americans. The promise was that if we gave long-term capital investment preferential tax treatment, then the capital class would invest the gains in American businesses, which would create new jobs. Basically, a larger amount of the cost of government would be shifted onto the backs of workers, but they would be paid better. However, that was before Jack Welch stated that no job is an American job. That is why he is know as "Neutron" Jack. He was famous for outsourcing GE, leaving once full buildings empty.
I want to bring something to light something for which most people are unaware. Reagan's tax cuts for the rich were in a large part covered by his increase in the FICA (Social Security} tax rate. I worked at the Social Security Administration for 6 years (2 years as a contractor and two years as an employee before leaving) as a computer scientist on the Re-Engineered Disability Process. At that point, due to Reagan's FICA tax increase, the Social Security Trust Fund was the largest holder of federal debt. The capital class became immensely wealthy because of preferential tax treatment whose deficit was partially covered by over funding of the Social Security Trust Fund (FICA receipts have been commingled with general revenues to help cover the deficit since the Johnson Administration). If the capital class is successful at killing Social Security, FICA payments will become little more than a backdoor income tax for those who have already paid into to the system. Remember, FICA is a payroll tax, not an income tax. One has to be on someone's payroll to pay it. The billionaires and many milllionaires do not pay FICA because their income is derived from long-term capital investment and long-term capital gains are not subject to the FICA tax. If we want to fix Social Security, we need to subject long-term capital gains to the same 15% (split between the employer and employee or paid in full by the self-employed) and remove the income cap. Workers are taking home 15% less money because of FICA. If FICA did not need to be withheld, most employers could afford to give employees a 15% pay raise.
The real reason the GOP has such a hard-on for the Affordable Care Act has nothing to do with healthcare. It has to do with a tax provision buried in the text that subjects long-term capital gains to the Medicare tax for the first time since the creation of the program. With the lion's share of the growth in GDP accruing to capital instead of work, removing Medicare taxation on long-term capital gains would lead to the end of Medicare as an even larger percentage of our GDP is captured by the capital class.
I believe that Brian Thompson was just the beginning. If the members of the capital class are not afraid, then they are incredibly stupid. We just went through twenty years of war that resulted in a metric truck load of combat veterans who know what it is like to be in a wartime fire fight. These people will not freeze up after shots ring out. The body guards that the capital class hire will not stand a chance against a determined squad of combat veterans (I am a veteran too). Hopefully, we do not get to that point. We can accomplish the same thing via boycotts and peaceful resistance (most of Musk's wealth is tied up in Tesla, so that is good place to start with our boycott). There are 330 million Americans. If we can just come together we can shut this nonsense down, united we stand.
Finally, racism was the first divide-and-conquer scheme employed by what was then the capital class; namely, the English gentry. It was the result of former indentured Europeans and Africans challenging the gentry for power during Bacon's Rebellion in 1676. Regardless of what you have heard, perpetual slavery did not exist in the 17th century because no law existed to support it. Almost everyone and it was almost everyone who came to this continent before 1800 came here in bondage, regardless of race due to the fact that the colonies practiced the "headright" system. We referred to white bondage as "indentured servitude," but it was slavery by another name. If a person does not have the right to his/her labor, he/she is a slave. I learned that indentured servitude was not the benign practice we were taught in school while researching my family roots in Maryland and Virginia. The oldest ancestor (7th great-grandfather) that I have been able to identify came to the Maryland colony in bondage in the 1660s. Most indentured servants did not live long enough to see freedom during the 17th century, but he managed to do it (Google "Body in the Basement Leavy Neck Anne Arundel County). The assertion that indentured servants were not treated like chattel is false. During my research in the Maryland Archives, I saw probate court records where indentured servants were passed from father to child in bondage. Pre-United States colonial bondage has been incredibly white washed, so that wealthy white people in the American South could still get poor white people to affinity group with them instead of with poor black with whom they have more in common. This division of the poor, so that they would never unite and challenge the elite for control was the goal of the divide-and-conquer scheme we know as racism today. Before Bacon's Rebellion, colonists were referred by their country of origin, not their race. Interracial marriage was common before Bacon's Rebellion, so much so, that Virginia and Maryland had to enact anti-miscegenation (anti-interracial marriage) laws in 1691 and 1692, respectively. Let me ask you something; namely, when was the last time a government created a law for a non-existent practice? The laws were need to keep the races separate, so that they would not unite.
Louis brandais - u can have wealth concentrated in the hands of the few or democracy, not both
When homelessness is expanding by 100 thousand people per year, the reality is setting in.
Wow someone with power actually said it… that this is self correcting and the correction will be pitchforks!
MORE Luigi's!
LESS CEO's.........
prettiest lady on TV, bravo
A society that allows billionaires is an unjust society. Unbridled capitalism is immoral. One who has a million dollars and wants more is (censored by yt.)
Mentally ill.
we aren't moving towards monopolistic oligarchies.....we are already there and have been for some time!
Jasmin is simply GORGEOUS! 😍
She’s the only reason I watch. 😅
TYT is NOT YOUNG 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Akin to the French Revolution of the 18th century.
The people that make big money don’t want to give up their access to it…
How does Scarborough still have a job
Remember folks, socialize the repercussions, and privatize the rewards.
Watch…John fetterman will be the next democrat nominee for president.
Yep. Love Trump or hate him. At least he busted up the Republican party and has run most of the old rusty status quo out of DC. More to come. Now we need the Dems to do the same. If only they had a candidate.
Such a smart comment from John. Every MSM talking head knows that they'll score points by saying that the rich have too much power. The question is whether they'll pressure anyone to do anything about it, and Joe never made this point when Democrats had any ability to do something about it. Now that Trump takes over next week, he can proudly talk about how broken everything is without actually threatening any of the levers of power. It's like the athlete who quits during every big game but has a million clever quotes in the offseason.
Capitlism doing its job
Lost all respect for Joe Scarborough when he bent the knee .
I'm just waiting for the tide to change.
Then....
Galloway invested in the distressed assets of FTX as a vulture investor and stands to make tens of millions, so his alarm bells about the moneyed class are a bit. . . rich.
Now let's do something about it!!
Luigi did.
Warren Buffets much lauded investment strategy is to invest in companies that monopolize their business.
Wrong, it used to be about income inequality, and then the Democrats and the corporations made it about race? And the suckers went along with it so we lost a good 10 years with this BS and the people responsible that fell for it need to look in the mirror and sayI’m a jackass
If Americans went outside their bubble and found out the rest of the world have free healthcare across
the board how would they react to living in the dark ages ?.
In Canada, the wait time for orthopedic surgery is well over a year.
Ill stick with my employer sponsored plan where I can get everything taken care of when I want.
The failing of ALL these systems will lead to people marching in the streets. The “zombie apocalypse” will be regular people trying to get answers for all this madness
Also, follow Gary's Economics, Gary Stevenson
Nobody think about it this way. If you have one group paying a 40% tax rate, and another group paying a 10% tax rate. Of course government policy will work to increase cash flow through the hands of those paying 40%
All these billionaires, politicians have the fate of the Romanovs in store for them.
Jeepers
This wasn't a rant.
Eat the rich
To compare the rich to the poor. Let us talk about taking responsibility for our own lives.
I don’t work a lot so I don’t make a lot.
If you would put these people that are the working for in positions where they were more effective you would have a different result.
Your raise will become effective when you become effective.
I can't fully make sense of what your saying, are you saying most Americans are just lazy and that's what creates income inequality?
Such a bs take. It's long since past this type of rhetoric being akin to any kind of reality.
What?!? 🤨😂
There ya go America, are we great yet?!?!?
As God of War… ads … I’m coming
Thanks for content
A bunch of unelected bureaucrats on one end, and a bunch of unelected oligarchs on the other end. In either extreme, everything is in the hands of the few. There is no difference.
BULLS*T that Scarborough doesn't invest! He has an investor!!!!!! Maybe he himself does not, but give me a break. He is worth MILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$!
Who is the new host ?
Meanwhile, the planet is on fire.
I sit here and pay bills I pay my QT fed tax and state and happy new year here is your county tax bill
Blame the wealthy for your problems? Go make your own money. Also, how does Trump trying to get the Panama Canal back, or work something out with Denmark over Greenland, affect his ability to make the cost of living go down. One is geopolitics and the other has more to do with the internal issues of our country. A president should be able to handle both.
Does Morning Joe in his Democratic Wolf's Clothing admit his part in this rampant corporate monopoly culture? He certainly helped by his attitude and news emphasized or hid.
Let's see, he and Mika make $10M each so you divide that by...
Joe is sickened.
Forgot to do his homework.
If people don’t know by now, the legal path for change, will maybe move things an inch in years, while other problems keep growing. Jobs that are non-essential should be shut off and people should be fixing national scary issues fast.
You guys should look into Scott more. He is a good man trying to fix stuff.
John thinks "we" choose candidates. You have a lot to learn young un
You should be taxed 99% over a billion
Damn oftentimes this Galliway dude totally misses the point and is a moron. But kudos to him for getting it right on this one!
Pls don’t go to John Iadarola - oh man…. Off to Breaking Points
I see Galloway alot. He dances around this issue a lot but this is the first time I see him say Income Inequality and Tax Code is the problem.
Calling Microsoft a monopoly on MS (ie Microsoft)NBC, shows how bad things have gotten
Curious, how much has the shift been made by Luigi’s action?
Well that's what your network said when bernie ran
Prof Galloway is awesome. Turned it off when I heard Joe the Trump suck up speak
We are in the middle of a turning and reckoning
Damn. Everybody is a conservative now.
The cauldron starts to boil...
Exactly, Amen😱👌🙏
He is rich but not a billionaire !
THE BOTTOM 15% PAY 0 INCOME TAX...0...
Because they have next to no income. When they don't make enough for food and shelter, why would the government take even more? We could/ should be taxing the billionaires at substantially higher rates, and the tax burden could be reduced on everyone else. Reagan is the reason all of this changed- they used to be taxed substantially higher than they are now. Every low-income person that voted for Trump voted against their own interests
15% have nothing you little BOT.
lol the look on joe s face
And if you are going to crap on MJ for his reaction to the election (and you should), you better take a look at the top of TYT!
Free Luigi!
7:50 lmao, how would have Kamala winning helped? She's worse for the working class
Worse than whom?
True. It was the working class that voted against her and Joe for their f'ed up economy,
Nah actually Kamala is 10000x better than tRUMP
Self correcting through civil uprising is right lol he actually said it think it would be harder these days though
I too, have huge problems with MJ (some of them may be different than yours) but at this point this is not shocking views to appear on MJ, if you are going to be fair.
As God of War.. what is your commentary during ww3?
News about how many more billionaires there are now doesn’t help pay my bills.
Pay your bills by voting for the right people who pass the legislation that doesn't pick your pocket. i.e. gets rid of the growth of billionaires.
True. Inflicting pain on one class while the poor still suffer is no answer at all.
Who still listens to Sean Hannity? Lol😂
Scott Galloway does a better job verbalizing his positions without sounding like a total pocket watching grifter like you people are that’s why he is successful while you both have been on this network for years and no one knows your name still