If they want to privately finance a new stadium that's fine. However, I think asking the taxpayers to fund(partly) a new stadium when they're current stadium is only twenty-two years old is going to be a very hard sell.
@@scotttildwell be careful. they could easily become the "Oakland Broncos" and move out of Denver. Now I always say cities should contribute 10% to 20% on any new venue project NFL, NBA & MLB. But 0? You gonna end up like the Oakland A's crying 😭
Whoa whoa, back up the comparison truck! The Coliseum is almost 60 years old, and has had issue after issue over the last handful of years! The A’s deserve a new ballpark! Where as the Broncos stadium is only 22 years old, is in much better shape, and aside from not being as modern as newer parks like in LA, Vegas, and Minnesota, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it. If the people who run that team want a new stadium, they should FULLY finance it!!
@@greggyd4734 I agree nothing is wrong with Denver stadium. But dont be stubborn. Dont do a reverse boycott like A's fans did. Fans need to tell ownership that the stadium is fine
@scotttild except will Kraft be alive by then?? Whoever owns the Pats after Kraft will more than likely be the typical billionaire who wants to gain more and spend less.
The Broncos ownership group purchased land near Denver International Airport. Enough land for a sports complex. As a Denver native, I am guessing 2032 a new stadium.
Both LA teams, ATL, Nola, Vegas, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Detroit, Minn, and Indy all either have domes or retractable roofs. Places that have dome/retractable roof stadiums in the planning stages or who are at least potentially looking to build ones include but aren’t limited to Charlotte, Nashville, DC, and Chicago. I’m sure there is one or two that I’m missing or the plans just haven’t become public. There is only one Super Bowl per year, one Final Four, one Winter Classic, and only so many college bowl games to around. At what point does competing against the other 20 something major cities for these events make it not worth the extra $ for a dome/retractable roof?
@@scotttild exactly. There's no guarantee they'd get a SB anyway, so it doesn't seem worth it. Even places like Minneapolis or Indianapolis will probably only have the one Super Bowl they've already hosted because those cities just aren't big destination/warm cities in February.
@@Gage_Brumleywell be careful. they could easily become the "Oakland Broncos" and move out of Denver. Now I always say cities should contribute 10% to 20% on any new venue project NFL, NBA & MLB. But 0? You gonna end up like the Oakland A's crying 😭
@@scotttild I disagree...billionaire or not..I would never go broke just to private fund a venue for a flaky fan base and city government. More teams would stay if you can just get the stadium done right once. Look at Boston and Chicago. Cities should at least drop 10% to 25% of any stadium project..if not..then another fanbase will...and ur team will leave and that's ur fault
I would be all for a roof to use the stafium for winter and spring venues and to make it an option for a super bowl. But i want an open stadium for broncos games. The mountains, the snow, its a cold weather city and weather games late in the season with snow and cold are my favorite games. Idk how you could make a stadium with a roof that doesnt block the elements when its open
The current stadium where the Broncos play is still pretty nice, I wouldn’t abandon it and build a new stadium in Denver, they should just renovate Empower Field and the Broncos stay there for many more years to come
Right now MLB has two stadiums that are over 100 years old, that have become big tourist attractions for baseball fans. 20 year old stadium: It just doesn’t work anymore.
@@statboy08well be careful. they could easily become the "Oakland Broncos" and move out of Denver. Now I always say cities should contribute 10% to 20% on any new venue project NFL, NBA & MLB. But 0? You gonna end up like the Oakland A's crying 😭
@@sirchi8731 Yes agreed. Being a Sacramento Kings, we reaped the benefits of two things - 1) a community that got behind the team staying and 2) a commissioner that was trying to cleanse his own slate after a disastrous move in his league
As a franchise, they're one of the best in the league and they're here to stay. Don't think they really need a new stadium but they've got the money if they're looking to upgrade.
Went to a preseason game last year in Denver while on vacation. I thought it was a great stadium and I don't see why a new one is needed (again) this early in the game. What is it with cities/teams building new stadiums when the existing one is perfectly fine?
You're forgetting they're now majority owned by the Walton Family. They would barely even notice the cost of a new stadium missing from the corporate account.
It's rare that Denver gets real bitter cold (ie less than 20 degrees fahrenheit). Denver gets some snow, but also gets plenty of winter days in the 50s or 60s. I like when football has different weather conditions, not a controlled environment.
I don't think Broncos fans in Denver will be all too happy about this. And I've never been to Empower Field at Mile High or even to Denver but I still like the current stadium.
Go for it, not a single penny from the taxpayers. The owners and players can pay for if. No public bonds no tax increases on the public ( increase in property tax is what they do " Indianapolis ".
Denver does not need a new stadium 22 years old is still young as long as they keep giving stadium good maintenance. I would add more suites thats it. The NFL is in bed with all these gambling companies they ain't stupid right now ESPN is in financial trouble there will be other media companies in trouble so Denver should at least wait until 2030 to see how the media market is. If ESPN collapses college football in trouble.
MLS includes new expansion teams in USA & Canada like: Calgary, Edmonton, Las Vegas, San Diego, Indianapolis, Detroit, Pittsburgh, New Orleans & much more all across both nations to the soccer venue!⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽
Broncos need to own the land around the stadium to stay competitive financially. New owners are rich but not dumb.... year round revenue outside the new stadiums dont need to be shared across the other 31 other teams. Broncos will build by the airport and build an entertainment district like every other nfl team is currently doing.
When the news first broke that the Walton family was buying a NFL team I knew then a new stadium was coming. I guarantee you it will happen within the next year or two. They will not only build a new stadium, but eventually a new practice and office facilities. The practice facilities will be as outstanding as what the Dallas cowboys currently have in the Dallas Star. The broncos new stadium will be better than the new Las Vegas raiders’ stadium. It’s Walmart money.
I don't understand the dome craze. There is only one Super Bowl and one Final Four each year. Even if you build a dome, if you're a cold weather city, then you will only get the Super Bowl once. Concert tours that have stadium shows are scheduled in the summer, so there is no reason they can't be held in outdoor stadiums.
Another 20 years Stadium bite the dust why ask taxpayers to build Stadium knowing it be gone in 20 years the Doliphins and Rams did a right things of building their own Stadiums that can be around 50 years
The whole problem with the stadium is the city of Denver owns it. Other owners make money off concert being held their venue not the Broncos. That goes to the city of Denver. Where The Waltons cousins on the Avalanche nuggets Colorado Rapids. And they own their own facilities. The kroenke's have ballerina rented out almost nightly for concert. Keeping all of that revenue for kroenke sports. Plus Denver is just a dismal City to begin with. In between the homeless the crime
It looks like a crushed aluminium can. No, honestly, when I first back ,that was my very first impression. Then if I remember right, it actually doesn't seat many more people than the old mile high. Now, no way will the taxpayer say yes to this on their dollar so soon. I remember how many times they tried to get this one " who shall remain name less " , and the tax payers said no for years.
As a Denver resident, it's simple. If you want a new stadium, then pay for your own stadium. Don't push back on the taxpayers, as we already have mostly paid for this stadium. Besides, the Broncos have been a joke for a long time. You don't reward terrible football.
These billionaire owners need to quit holding the taxpayers hostage. If I was in any position of political power and I had them coming to me asking for sort of tax breaks, I’ll tell them to go piss off.
Seems like they just built a new Mile High Stadium. Guess I'm getting old. In snow country, that roof will also need to be able to shed the snow pack that will build up. Wasn't there a problem in Minnesota with a snow roof caving in? There must be a way to melt the buildup into some dranage system to remove it from the grounds. Moving Mile High to another location is nutts. That is apart of the Denver legecy. Noone wants it moved. You know teams like KC are kicking ass. So its not the stadium. They still play in good ole Arrowhead and they like it that way. Mile High is fine right where it is. What is pissing me off though, is seeing advertising on the players jerseys. I'm going on record stating adds on jerseys, suck! American Football does not have that crap. I've watched NFL football for 60 years. Always been a Bronco fan. The players are not sports car drivers. These teams are not European sport teams and don't want to be. The NFL is pimping its self out for advertising and is destorying the Football Jersey images for everyone. I hope we stop this now before it gets out of hand. Next thing you know, the'll be called the Denver, Walmart Broncos.
They're not going to get more events if they have a dome. Denver is a mid-tier city. They would be no different than Msp. They will get one or two events every 10-15 yrs AT BEST.
Спорт
If they want to privately finance a new stadium that's fine. However, I think asking the taxpayers to fund(partly) a new stadium when they're current stadium is only twenty-two years old is going to be a very hard sell.
@@scotttildwell be careful. they could easily become the "Oakland Broncos" and move out of Denver. Now I always say cities should contribute 10% to 20% on any new venue project NFL, NBA & MLB. But 0? You gonna end up like the Oakland A's crying 😭
@@sirchi8731 you're on the oakland crack if you think they would ever leave lol.
Whoa whoa, back up the comparison truck! The Coliseum is almost 60 years old, and has had issue after issue over the last handful of years! The A’s deserve a new ballpark! Where as the Broncos stadium is only 22 years old, is in much better shape, and aside from not being as modern as newer parks like in LA, Vegas, and Minnesota, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it. If the people who run that team want a new stadium, they should FULLY finance it!!
@@bladex2056 the 1995 Cleveland Browns said the same thing😬 ended up on a Sports Illustrated cover while they moved to Baltimore
@@greggyd4734 I agree nothing is wrong with Denver stadium. But dont be stubborn. Dont do a reverse boycott like A's fans did. Fans need to tell ownership that the stadium is fine
Are you kidding me? Why does EVERY team need a new stadium now? Just renovate and save a ton of money, especially for stadiums barely 20 years old...
@scotttild except will Kraft be alive by then?? Whoever owns the Pats after Kraft will more than likely be the typical billionaire who wants to gain more and spend less.
But a new indoor stadium were they are now could host more other events no matter the weather.
You've not been to a game in a domed stadium.😂🤣🤣
Weather in Denver is getting more extreme in either summer or winter; a retractable roof is definitely needed.
their current stadium is only 22 years old ..
I love football being played in the elements, especially snow. From my perspective, a game played in a dome on field turf just makes the game boring.
Too bad there are too many soft casuals who hate cold weather that drive owners to build these domes
You've not been to a game in a domed stadium.
I’m okay with one or two, maybe three domed stadiums but if the league goes with 30 indoor facilities then it really is a no fun league.
Gotta love the new modern era. As soon as a place gets over 20 years old theyre thinking about a new one already. Crazy...
The Broncos ownership group purchased land near Denver International Airport. Enough land for a sports complex. As a Denver native, I am guessing 2032 a new stadium.
Fans won't want it near DIA. But they may put up with it for 8 or 9 days a year.
Both LA teams, ATL, Nola, Vegas, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Detroit, Minn, and Indy all either have domes or retractable roofs. Places that have dome/retractable roof stadiums in the planning stages or who are at least potentially looking to build ones include but aren’t limited to Charlotte, Nashville, DC, and Chicago. I’m sure there is one or two that I’m missing or the plans just haven’t become public. There is only one Super Bowl per year, one Final Four, one Winter Classic, and only so many college bowl games to around. At what point does competing against the other 20 something major cities for these events make it not worth the extra $ for a dome/retractable roof?
@@scotttild exactly. There's no guarantee they'd get a SB anyway, so it doesn't seem worth it. Even places like Minneapolis or Indianapolis will probably only have the one Super Bowl they've already hosted because those cities just aren't big destination/warm cities in February.
Sofi Stadium is not a dome or retractable. It has a cover with open sides
@@Gage_Brumleywell be careful. they could easily become the "Oakland Broncos" and move out of Denver. Now I always say cities should contribute 10% to 20% on any new venue project NFL, NBA & MLB. But 0? You gonna end up like the Oakland A's crying 😭
@@sirchi8731 @sirchi8731 Cities should contribute 0% stadium funding. Not 1 red cent.
@@scotttild I disagree...billionaire or not..I would never go broke just to private fund a venue for a flaky fan base and city government. More teams would stay if you can just get the stadium done right once. Look at Boston and Chicago. Cities should at least drop 10% to 25% of any stadium project..if not..then another fanbase will...and ur team will leave and that's ur fault
I would be all for a roof to use the stafium for winter and spring venues and to make it an option for a super bowl. But i want an open stadium for broncos games. The mountains, the snow, its a cold weather city and weather games late in the season with snow and cold are my favorite games. Idk how you could make a stadium with a roof that doesnt block the elements when its open
The new mile high is still pretty good I would say and would age pretty well. I would want to keep the winter games for a city like Denver tbh.
The current stadium where the Broncos play is still pretty nice, I wouldn’t abandon it and build a new stadium in Denver, they should just renovate Empower Field and the Broncos stay there for many more years to come
The Waltons would also have to extend the lease on the land to play at Empower Field longer.
A stadium is not a stadium without a rendering.
Right now MLB has two stadiums that are over 100 years old, that have become big tourist attractions for baseball fans.
20 year old stadium: It just doesn’t work anymore.
Ding ding ding. The NBA, NHL and NFL are all guilty of it.
@@statboy08well be careful. they could easily become the "Oakland Broncos" and move out of Denver. Now I always say cities should contribute 10% to 20% on any new venue project NFL, NBA & MLB. But 0? You gonna end up like the Oakland A's crying 😭
@@sirchi8731 - If the A's leave, thats it for Oakland. I dont see any of the big four making Oakland a home for anything at least in my lifetime
@@statboy08 depends on city government. The big four will come back to Oakland but its gonna take a rich group and cooperative city government
@@sirchi8731 Yes agreed. Being a Sacramento Kings, we reaped the benefits of two things - 1) a community that got behind the team staying and 2) a commissioner that was trying to cleanse his own slate after a disastrous move in his league
As a franchise, they're one of the best in the league and they're here to stay. Don't think they really need a new stadium but they've got the money if they're looking to upgrade.
A state of the art dome stadium will be awesome
Went to a preseason game last year in Denver while on vacation. I thought it was a great stadium and I don't see why a new one is needed (again) this early in the game. What is it with cities/teams building new stadiums when the existing one is perfectly fine?
You're forgetting they're now majority owned by the Walton Family. They would barely even notice the cost of a new stadium missing from the corporate account.
problem with an open stadium, too cold for winter, Too hot for summer, which makes this new wave of domes make scene
People are far too soft. Never too warm or cold outside. People are ridiculous
@@trickolas78Agreed.
It's rare that Denver gets real bitter cold (ie less than 20 degrees fahrenheit). Denver gets some snow, but also gets plenty of winter days in the 50s or 60s. I like when football has different weather conditions, not a controlled environment.
Denevr doesnt need a roof or dome. Its tradition. Playing the snow in mile high altitude.
They can’t fix my road but they’ll raise taxes to build a new stadium
That's assuming they go 50-50 split on public/private money.
I like this first rendering. It’s not over the top but it’s still high tech
I don't think Broncos fans in Denver will be all too happy about this. And I've never been to Empower Field at Mile High or even to Denver but I still like the current stadium.
Wow, I thought the Broncos already had a new stadium.
Go for it, not a single penny from the taxpayers. The owners and players can pay for if. No public bonds no tax increases on the public ( increase in property tax is what they do " Indianapolis ".
And of course anything with moving parts is always more expensive...
Denver does not need a new stadium 22 years old is still young as long as they keep giving stadium good maintenance. I would add more suites thats it. The NFL is in bed with all these gambling companies they ain't stupid right now ESPN is in financial trouble there will be other media companies in trouble so Denver should at least wait until 2030 to see how the media market is. If ESPN collapses college football in trouble.
I actually think the Soldier Field renderings look kinda cool 😂
MLS includes new expansion teams in USA & Canada like: Calgary, Edmonton, Las Vegas, San Diego, Indianapolis, Detroit, Pittsburgh, New Orleans & much more all across both nations to the soccer venue!⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽
I liked the old Mile High
Broncos need to own the land around the stadium to stay competitive financially. New owners are rich but not dumb.... year round revenue outside the new stadiums dont need to be shared across the other 31 other teams. Broncos will build by the airport and build an entertainment district like every other nfl team is currently doing.
"Barrack-o's" 😂😂
The solution is obvious. Nfl should be a spring league. Then every city has the potential to host a SB.
Completely absurd
Mile High is a beautiful stadium much better than Arrowhead by far
IMO one of the best stadiums in the world
The Denver Broncos playing games under a roof? That’s football heresy.
When the news first broke that the Walton family was buying a NFL team I knew then a new stadium was coming. I guarantee you it will happen within the next year or two. They will not only build a new stadium, but eventually a new practice and office facilities. The practice facilities will be as outstanding as what the Dallas cowboys currently have in the Dallas Star. The broncos new stadium will be better than the new Las Vegas raiders’ stadium. It’s Walmart money.
Well what do ya know, the Broncos are investing their money in a new practice facility.
Don't the Broncos have a fairly new stadium? I hope the Broncos pay for a new stadium and not the taxpayers. What a colossal waste of money.
I don't understand the dome craze. There is only one Super Bowl and one Final Four each year. Even if you build a dome, if you're a cold weather city, then you will only get the Super Bowl once. Concert tours that have stadium shows are scheduled in the summer, so there is no reason they can't be held in outdoor stadiums.
Is there any news on the new Titan stadium?
Another 20 years Stadium bite the dust why ask taxpayers to build Stadium knowing it be gone in 20 years the Doliphins and Rams did a right things of building their own Stadiums that can be around 50 years
Man I just went to Mile High Stadium last year and genuinely thought it was pretty nice. We’re such a spoiled country
Make sure you put a chop house and ale house in there
I’m a chiefs fan and love the new Mile High Stadium. It’s really nice, I think it would be criminal to move
The whole problem with the stadium is the city of Denver owns it.
Other owners make money off concert being held their venue not the Broncos.
That goes to the city of Denver.
Where The Waltons cousins on the Avalanche nuggets Colorado Rapids. And they own their own facilities.
The kroenke's have ballerina rented out almost nightly for concert. Keeping all of that revenue for kroenke sports. Plus Denver is just a dismal City to begin with. In between the homeless the crime
Current one is barely 20ys old. Must be nice to toss billions around
Every team wants to copycat other stadiums now. These stadiums aren't even very old. Use the basketball arena for concerts and stuff.
MLS Colorado Rapids might move to Bronco’s Empower Field at Mile High
He’s wrong about Denver being a huge city. The metro area only has about 3 million people.
Look for lots of relocations.
If the do they should call it the Denver dome
I wouldn't call Kevin Warren's career path "failing upwards" ... it's more like "failing laterally" because, after all, it's "Da Bears."
It looks like a crushed aluminium can. No, honestly, when I first back ,that was my very first impression. Then if I remember right, it actually doesn't seat many more people than the old mile high. Now, no way will the taxpayer say yes to this on their dollar so soon. I remember how many times they tried to get this one " who shall remain name less " , and the tax payers said no for years.
Drop the advertising from the Jerseys.
They literally have a new stadium
A billion dollars can do mankind alot of good especially when the current stadium is very servicable.
NFL Pro Bowl coming back to Orlando and to Camping World Stadium.
Good point about not ever getting a Super Bowl, and other big concerts in the winter.
The bears belong in the city not in the boring suburbs
Denver broncos
As a Denver resident, it's simple. If you want a new stadium, then pay for your own stadium. Don't push back on the taxpayers, as we already have mostly paid for this stadium. Besides, the Broncos have been a joke for a long time. You don't reward terrible football.
These billionaire owners need to quit holding the taxpayers hostage. If I was in any position of political power and I had them coming to me asking for sort of tax breaks, I’ll tell them to go piss off.
And then you would have no tax revenue and homelessness abounding because of the loss of jobs
Taxpayers should always pay
Seems like they just built a new Mile High Stadium. Guess I'm getting old.
In snow country, that roof will also need to be able to shed the snow pack that will build up. Wasn't there a problem in Minnesota with a snow roof caving in? There must be a way to melt the buildup into some dranage system to remove it from the grounds.
Moving Mile High to another location is nutts. That is apart of the Denver legecy. Noone wants it moved.
You know teams like KC are kicking ass. So its not the stadium. They still play in good ole Arrowhead and they like it that way.
Mile High is fine right where it is.
What is pissing me off though, is seeing advertising on the players jerseys. I'm going on record stating adds on jerseys, suck!
American Football does not have that crap. I've watched NFL football for 60 years. Always been a Bronco fan. The players are not sports car drivers. These teams are not European sport teams and don't want to be.
The NFL is pimping its self out for advertising and is destorying the Football Jersey images for everyone. I hope we stop this now before it gets out of hand.
Next thing you know, the'll be called the Denver, Walmart Broncos.
broncos are smart there thinking big picture about pll, mlr, and slamball chess not checkers
Current stadium 🏟 is new come on
Demolish what they have now and rebuild it retractable stadium current spot.
Where would the Broncos play? They could dump a lot of money to expand/renovate the Colorado Rapids' stadium
Not that broncos really need a new.
Open air like sofi
They didn't have this vision until now.??? Well better late than never.
It's been in the works for a while. This video was made 10 months ago.
"Information", not "info"!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who's gonna tell John that "Info" is short for "Information?"
They're not going to get more events if they have a dome. Denver is a mid-tier city. They would be no different than Msp. They will get one or two events every 10-15 yrs AT BEST.
Pretty Sure, you will need to clear this with Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes, as they have owned the Broncos, winning the last 15 straight... 😂🤣😂🤣
No retractable roof 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬