Fermilab is NOT shut down. We shutdown one of our accelerators, the Tevatron, last fall but we are moving forward into the Intensity Frontier of particle physics. Come visit and see. We're close by!
I've been there twice, once in 1980 and again in 82...I think. I didn't really understand it at the time, but thanks to videos like this I have a much stronger grasp. I'm a fan, keep up the great vids.
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
Hey! Im 15, and i filled ~50 pages with the information from theese videos! Its interesting! You can learn theese! It's such a wonderful feeling to get a little bit closer to understand, what happens around us, and why does it happen. I especialy like relativity, but i have to rewatch several parts of the videos. But it works! Im learning!
I agree. I struggled with the basics of chemistry for a long time and this has actually solved most of my doubts about charge mass and behavior of different substances.
After a good deal of trying to understand the Standard Model of quantum physics, this video has explained to me the final bits I needed to get my puzzle solved... This is probably the best (sort of dumbed-down) explanation of the Standard Model I've seen!
Just gone back to studying physics and chemistry A-levels, after half a lifetime of art and philosophy:) Am loving it. It's a good change to have right or wrong answers, after so much subjectivity;) This guy has quickly become my 'go to' for great, personable explanations:) thankyou x
Thanks Dr. Don.You have no idea how disarming your presentation is. You seem like one of the best spokepersons to explain why we need to keep funding this research. You've convinced me and (btw) I've always hated Theoretical Physics for it's lack of focus, inattention, and utter disregard to simply "building a better mouse trap".
Such a useful video, I’m currently studying particle physics in high school and I was struggling to get my head around the whole idea. Thank you so much!
Thanks, Fermilab! I've been keeping up since I was a student reading Scientific American. Went there with my husband and his sister, they still talk about it after five years.
Thank you for a wonderfully explanatory video. I recall hearing you on the old Milt Rosenberg radio show. How great those programs were. I'm an old Liberal Arts guy who is rediscovering science. As I read and watch each day, I am continually surprised and astonished at the macro and the micro. With Einstein and Quantum Physics, who needs Science Fiction?
I never really knew the role of bosons, now I know they're the forces, every video or documentary I watch teaches me something knew or makes me think about something differently than I've done before, thank you fermilab
Good lord...I did Chem, Bio and Math for A levels and always regretted not doing Physics. Never understood the standard model and the reason why in this age of information is any video I watch starts off with a ten minute history lesson, then they mention the sub atomic particles and then go into quantum mechanics and confuse themselves and me just because they want to say "quantum mechanics". This video is the first I've seen that simply explains it beautifully... Thank you so much!
I really don't understand force by particle exchange. 1. How does attraction work 2. Wouldn't the particle get exhausted by emitting exchange particles, even when the receiving particle is not there, if it only emits the exchange particle when the other particle is there, then how does is come to know about it.
So here's my best explanation. I think it's more helpful to think of the 'particle' as a wave packet. Take the gluon for example. The gluon has a mass/energy nearly as large as a single atom of gold. But when a gluon is bound within a system of quarks, it creates a wave 'trough' or potential energy well. The quarks attract each other because they lie at the lowest energy point of this gluon well. For the quarks to be split apart requires sufficient energy to overcome this gluon potential energy well. And as I mentioned, that energy is huge - comparable to the mass / energy of single gold atom.
It's not force boson fermions or Particle exchange , but Rather all Force particle exsist as a Unifiable Field and it's Fields Vibration or spin is what's we called Force and, It's Orientation is what we call Quarks ,Electron ,proton Photon or basic particle matter building blocks
5:05 Yeah I was confused about the weak force. Like always physicists brush this off by saying "the weak force is responsible for some type of radioactivity". But now I got it after the new video of fermilab about the weak force and going in details about it.
Awesome job with the explanation. This is sci comm at its best. Doesn't dumb down anything, gives an honest look at the current situation and uses good analogies to make it easier to the lay viewer.
ruclips.net/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/видео.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!! It was like a review for me ...since I have learned first from you and then from others too...!!! Still keep on reviewing to make sure ...and remind myself of the terminology...!!!
Break down isnt really the right way of putting it. The weak force can essentially change the flavour (type) of particle, and if it changes from a high energy particle to a lower energy particle then other particles will be created using the left over energy
Thanks for the video - it helped answer some of my queries on the atomic make up....which has puzzled me during the O.U. course I am doing. Its a good job gravity force is so small - otherwise I would be much heavier - its bad enough now trying to loose weight.
That's actually one of the best videos about this subject, I don't have a deep knowledge on physics although I have lot o curiosity and interest on it, even with my little knowledge I could understand the main idea behind the concepts and want to learn even more about it!
Good stuff !! You explain complicated subjects in a simple way. I "wish" you would do a video on Electromagnetism. I understand the words, "a photon" has two fields, electric field and magnetic field; but I think you could make the concept more intuitive.
Excellent presentation! I am reassured that there still some "secrets" to be discovered and questions to be answered (for my grand-children that is). Thank you, Ciao, L
I have a few questions 😁 Does gravity affect all sizes of particles? Even Higgs Boson? Am I the only person who believes that there is no end to how “small” or “elemental” something can be?
ruclips.net/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/видео.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
ruclips.net/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/видео.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
If gravity is a space time bending then at the lowest, smallest measurements, then surely you would understand the direction of the force would be negligible against a space time curve and hence it wouldn't apply. Its like resistance of something massive with huge momentum ignoring gravity. Imagine a bending ruler, then focus in on the centre. The closer you get to it the straighter the edges look. Eventually everything travels in a straight line, always.
joppadoni this is a cool thought but it's based on the premise of a center existing in the first place. space time does not have a center , so the idea of a direction of the force of gravity doesn't exactly exist.
indeed, the deeper you go in to a mass the flatter space time becomes, hence no central point, thats why gravity reduces the further you dig a deep, deep, deep hole in to, say the earth. but i dont think that matters, the distances become so tiny. only in black holes would that curvature become a feature, or rather an effect. i think it is here that the answers will be found to link the two.
Wow always great to revisit, wow is it that long. Thanks Dr Don and the Fermilab-YT-Team, every video is an honour to see, educational and entertaining. Will a Lepto-Quark be found ever? :-) NEAL
Edit Don Lincoln (born 1964) is an American physicist, author, host of the RUclips channel Fermilab, and science communicator. He conducts research in particle physics at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and is an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.[1] He received a Ph.D. in experimental particle physics from Rice University in 1994. In 1995, he was a codiscoverer of the top quark.[2] He has coauthored hundreds of research papers and, more recently, was a member of the team that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.[3.....from wikipedia......(sir,, take my salute)
I have an important question that's been bugging me. When he explains how bosons serve has particles that bounce between two other particles, the image of the guys playing catch on the shore shows that it pushes them further apart. But it's supposed to be what keeps particles together? I'm trying to wrap my head around how that works
Jovarans Guplar i believe it’s way way more complicated than that, it’s just an overly simplified example, I urge you not to overthink overly simplified examples as it won’t really help
so the higgs boson gives particles mass, but isn't that what gravity does? could higgs and gravitons be the same thing? I've always seen gravity demonstrated as a bowling ball on a mattress causing marbles to fall into its depression, so is the mattress in that example representing the higgs field?
I can't wait until I'm far enough into my education to learn and understand the math and experimentation behind subatomic particle physics :D I'M SO EXCITED (and impatient) ...just thought I'd mention that because this video reminded me to be curious and ask questions :)
1:18 The trouble with terms like “element” and “atom” is that, almost as soon as we give them to something, we discover that that thing is not so “elementary” or “atomic” after all, and can be broken down into smaller pieces ...
Dear Don Lincoln, could you, please, elaborate on how particle exchange can explain the action of forces? For example, it is easy to see the repulsion as it was demonstrated in this video, but how about the attractive forces, how do we explain with particle exchange? Would the boat have to through a sack away from person on the shore? How does particle conservation apply to this context?
I imagine a world where we slowly learn to manipulate and control smaller realms of matter. From chemistry and nano-tech today which harnesses and arranges atoms, to perhaps one day being able to control and manipulate these quarks and other particles, to whatever is inside/hidden under them when we learn to manipulate them. I hope the trail never ends... or stops getting smaller.
Crystal clear. In my case I've discovered the ultimate "particle" of particles, which I think (and I find no other) is the most elementary building block of all what IS. I'm trying to write a paper to publish this "discovery". Hoping it's not rejected by Elseviere (SCOPUS).
I have a question, since all things are made of proton neutron electron, and now we know it are based on smaller building blocks explained by the standard model, where do all this particles come from? Can we build these particles, thus we can somewhat create something out of nothing?
Fermilab scientists know what gravity is. It is a partial entanglement phenomenon. It so rare and weak because it is rare entanglements and partial entanglemets to break, well it happens but at very lower rates. partial entanglements are easily to DEGRADE than pure entanglements among only two particles. A partial entanglement of many particles has a lower degrading threshold level, and even the quantum noise level of the void affects it. If we heat something it becomes heavier because we allow partial entanglements degrade at faster rates, but not way faster except in neutron stars, compressed plasma black hole accretion disk etc. Each new partial entanglement degrades at a more stable quantum state, but not all energy is transformed into motion, some is spread out as heat. Of course we have statistically some few pure entanglements, but even them may degrade, but in that case not with an interaction with a field as partially entangled particels or with random low quantum noise of the void, but with moving partially entangled particles or purely entangle particles that crush on the purely entangled one. I want to that Fermilab for explaining what gravity really is!!! these guys have relly TOP iq !!! ok, the Fermigravity or Entanglogravity is one option, we also have chromogravity [MIT about chomatic information shared partially to other particles and not only inside one] but some scientists claim that both theories are the same mathematically entanglogravity is way simpler though [just a different flavour as many claim]
"What exactly is fire and what makes it glow?" *GREAT QUESTION TIMMY, LET'S LOOK AT THE STANDARD MODEL.*
I laughed hard at this!
😂😂😂😂😂
RAZENOID!?!?!?!?!
What is TV and what makes it glow?
Timmy: Can we eat that?
Fermilab is NOT shut down. We shutdown one of our accelerators, the Tevatron, last fall but we are moving forward into the Intensity Frontier of particle physics. Come visit and see. We're close by!
Very Informative. Thanks for sharing. Best wishes, Lord-Jesus-Christ com
I've been there twice, once in 1980 and again in 82...I think. I didn't really understand it at the time, but thanks to videos like this I have a much stronger grasp. I'm a fan, keep up the great vids.
must like this no matter what happen :D
how close you are now?
I LOVE FERMILAB!!!!
me: ok today imma go to sleep early
my brain at 3 AM: wanna learn about subatomic particle physics and the nature of the universe itself?
Nice
genius
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
My brain at 3am: let's check the fridge!
Big same
This should be required watching for all children when they start high-school or even earlier if the parents can explain it properly.
agreed!
Chloecybin I would of loved being taught this as a freshman.
Hey! Im 15, and i filled ~50 pages with the information from theese videos! Its interesting! You can learn theese! It's such a wonderful feeling to get a little bit closer to understand, what happens around us, and why does it happen. I especialy like relativity, but i have to rewatch several parts of the videos. But it works! Im learning!
I agree. I struggled with the basics of chemistry for a long time and this has actually solved most of my doubts about charge mass and behavior of different substances.
@@loganreidy7055 I doubt you would understand it. You write "would of", instead of would have. No offence, pal, but that's the act of a moron.
Thanks for existing, Fermilab
After a good deal of trying to understand the Standard Model of quantum physics, this video has explained to me the final bits I needed to get my puzzle solved... This is probably the best (sort of dumbed-down) explanation of the Standard Model I've seen!
Just gone back to studying physics and chemistry A-levels, after half a lifetime of art and philosophy:) Am loving it. It's a good change to have right or wrong answers, after so much subjectivity;) This guy has quickly become my 'go to' for great, personable explanations:) thankyou x
Thanks Dr. Don.You have no idea how disarming your presentation is. You seem like one of the best spokepersons to explain why we need to keep funding this research. You've convinced me and (btw) I've always hated Theoretical Physics for it's lack of focus, inattention, and utter disregard to simply "building a better mouse trap".
..so your children ask these questions ?
the only questions is I hear is "Who took the xbox controller again " Why didnt you charge it ?"
What about "When can I have that DLC heavy triple A game for the price of a quiet night out Dad?"
Such a useful video, I’m currently studying particle physics in high school and I was struggling to get my head around the whole idea. Thank you so much!
Thanks, Fermilab! I've been keeping up since I was a student reading Scientific American. Went there with my husband and his sister, they still talk about it after five years.
Standard Model very well explained in 8 minutes.. This must be some kind of World Record. Thank you!
I really like Don Lincoln's presentations. They informative and very coherently constructed. Keep up the good work fermilab, I'm a big fan :)
This is one of those videos where I scroll down a couple of times to make sure I pressed the like button
How did you get fire in your hand like that without getting burned?
Sho says it was fire? Or that it was hot?
You didn't know? All scientists know magic
This are the types of questions that are fun to think about.
@@MeloettaMarmalade There s No Such Thing As Magic.
@@SonGojit456 whoosh
Thank you for a wonderfully explanatory video. I recall hearing you on the old Milt Rosenberg radio show. How great those programs were. I'm an old Liberal Arts guy who is rediscovering science. As I read and watch each day, I am continually surprised and astonished at the macro and the micro. With Einstein and Quantum Physics, who needs Science Fiction?
Thanks a lot for the subtitles in English, they make the google translator very easy for other languages.
I never really knew the role of bosons, now I know they're the forces, every video or documentary I watch teaches me something knew or makes me think about something differently than I've done before, thank you fermilab
One minute in and I have subscribed. FYI I am a lawyer but my curiosity brought me here. Time well spent!
Amazing how much discovered and changed in the time of this video.
Dude, you rock! There are lots of people on RUclips who crush it, but you take it to the next level. Thanks!!
Good lord...I did Chem, Bio and Math for A levels and always regretted not doing Physics. Never understood the standard model and the reason why in this age of information is any video I watch starts off with a ten minute history lesson, then they mention the sub atomic particles and then go into quantum mechanics and confuse themselves and me just because they want to say "quantum mechanics". This video is the first I've seen that simply explains it beautifully... Thank you so much!
I really don't understand force by particle exchange.
1. How does attraction work
2. Wouldn't the particle get exhausted by emitting exchange particles, even when the receiving particle is not there, if it only emits the exchange particle when the other particle is there, then how does is come to know about it.
Those are called virtual particles and they are just mathematical abstraction.
Hi.....
So here's my best explanation. I think it's more helpful to think of the 'particle' as a wave packet. Take the gluon for example. The gluon has a mass/energy nearly as large as a single atom of gold. But when a gluon is bound within a system of quarks, it creates a wave 'trough' or potential energy well. The quarks attract each other because they lie at the lowest energy point of this gluon well. For the quarks to be split apart requires sufficient energy to overcome this gluon potential energy well. And as I mentioned, that energy is huge - comparable to the mass / energy of single gold atom.
It's not force boson fermions or Particle exchange , but Rather all Force particle exsist as a Unifiable Field and it's Fields Vibration or spin is what's we called Force and, It's Orientation is what we call Quarks ,Electron ,proton Photon or basic particle matter building blocks
Upvote for proper pronunciation of 'quark'.
Kwark
It rhymes with Mark. End of story (Finnegan's Wake).
@@Jehannum2000 There's no apostrophe in Finnegans Wake.
5:05
Yeah I was confused about the weak force. Like always physicists brush this off by saying "the weak force is responsible for some type of radioactivity". But now I got it after the new video of fermilab about the weak force and going in details about it.
Awesome job with the explanation. This is sci comm at its best. Doesn't dumb down anything, gives an honest look at the current situation and uses good analogies to make it easier to the lay viewer.
ruclips.net/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/видео.html
The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics
Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Very much appreciated . Not too dumber down not too difficulty for anyone willing to make an effort. Thank you
This channel is a gem
Excellently and clearly simplified, thank you for making this video :)
THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!
It was like a review for me ...since I have learned first from you and then from others too...!!!
Still keep on reviewing to make sure ...and remind myself of the terminology...!!!
Why is the down quark considered fundamental when, during beta decay, it breaks down to an up quark, an electron, and a neutrino?
Break down isnt really the right way of putting it. The weak force can essentially change the flavour (type) of particle, and if it changes from a high energy particle to a lower energy particle then other particles will be created using the left over energy
Your videos help me start on topics I dont know where to start with.
This was explained so clearly! Happy to say that I now finally understand the standard model.
Thanks for the video - it helped answer some of my queries on the atomic make up....which has puzzled me during the O.U. course I am doing.
Its a good job gravity force is so small - otherwise I would be much heavier - its bad enough now trying to loose weight.
But your mass still would be same, assuming the universe would still exist.
That's actually one of the best videos about this subject, I don't have a deep knowledge on physics although I have lot o curiosity and interest on it, even with my little knowledge I could understand the main idea behind the concepts and want to learn even more about it!
Good stuff !! You explain complicated subjects in a simple way. I "wish" you would do a video on Electromagnetism. I understand the words, "a photon" has two fields, electric field and magnetic field; but I think you could make the concept more intuitive.
Excellent presentation! I am reassured that there still some "secrets" to be discovered and questions to be answered (for my grand-children that is). Thank you, Ciao, L
the best video found that tackles of fundamental particles. Looking forward for more videos
Excellent illustration & explanation of the standard model, thanks
if your kids ask those types of questions, you are a great dad!
I have a few questions 😁 Does gravity affect all sizes of particles? Even Higgs Boson?
Am I the only person who believes that there is no end to how “small” or “elemental” something can be?
You are a scientist but yet you deliver lecture from Such point of view that even who hasn't studied it will get it😍😇
ruclips.net/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/видео.html
The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics
Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Thanks for the extraordinary explanation.
thank you, i finally get the standard model thanks to your explanation.
Next level simplification is…thank you Sir.
ruclips.net/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/видео.html
The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics
Watch till the end ang share if found informative
This is the vedio I was looking since long time thankyou so much for uploading this 🥺🥺😢
That is one of the amazing videos. Thanks.
Yes I finally understand the Standard Model! I subscribed 👍
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
Very good explanation,thanks very much,greetings from México.
That was an Amazing Explanation Sir
If gravity is a space time bending then at the lowest, smallest measurements, then surely you would understand the direction of the force would be negligible against a space time curve and hence it wouldn't apply. Its like resistance of something massive with huge momentum ignoring gravity. Imagine a bending ruler, then focus in on the centre. The closer you get to it the straighter the edges look. Eventually everything travels in a straight line, always.
like it
nice
joppadoni this is a cool thought but it's based on the premise of a center existing in the first place. space time does not have a center , so the idea of a direction of the force of gravity doesn't exactly exist.
indeed, the deeper you go in to a mass the flatter space time becomes, hence no central point, thats why gravity reduces the further you dig a deep, deep, deep hole in to, say the earth. but i dont think that matters, the distances become so tiny. only in black holes would that curvature become a feature, or rather an effect. i think it is here that the answers will be found to link the two.
I love videos like this. Filled with information and very well made. Thank you! (But I am greedy... I want more!) ;)
Holy hell I wish this channel existed when I was in school
Well done. Your analogies are top notch!!!
You are really good at what you do. Thanks for the refresher
Excellent, lucid, understandable lecture
Don is great at explaining and teaching!
Is the Higgs boson officially now part of the Standard Model?
Wow always great to revisit, wow is it that long.
Thanks Dr Don and the Fermilab-YT-Team, every video is an honour to see, educational and entertaining.
Will a Lepto-Quark be found ever? :-)
NEAL
Fantastic vid. I knew the model by heart, but this really explains it nicely. Wish I had this when I learnt it, brilliant.
I loved the blooper. Dr Don rocks!
Edit
Don Lincoln (born 1964) is an American physicist, author, host of the RUclips channel Fermilab, and science communicator. He conducts research in particle physics at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and is an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.[1] He received a Ph.D. in experimental particle physics from Rice University in 1994. In 1995, he was a codiscoverer of the top quark.[2] He has coauthored hundreds of research papers and, more recently, was a member of the team that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.[3.....from wikipedia......(sir,, take my salute)
I love the fact that gravity waves have now been detected. It shows the continual change and progress of science. :)
I have an important question that's been bugging me.
When he explains how bosons serve has particles that bounce between two other particles, the image of the guys playing catch on the shore shows that it pushes them further apart.
But it's supposed to be what keeps particles together? I'm trying to wrap my head around how that works
Jovarans Guplar i believe it’s way way more complicated than that, it’s just an overly simplified example, I urge you not to overthink overly simplified examples as it won’t really help
He's only stating that the bozons apply a force when they move. The example is just to understand the idea. It doesn't mean they move apart
so the higgs boson gives particles mass, but isn't that what gravity does? could higgs and gravitons be the same thing?
I've always seen gravity demonstrated as a bowling ball on a mattress causing marbles to fall into its depression, so is the mattress in that example representing the higgs field?
Imma be honest this was way better than Wikipedia for someone like me who has no idea what their doing thx
how does this only have 100K views? I think everyone should be required to watch this.
Great video. Thank you very much.
I think Don’s fingertips have the strong force. They keep connecting. Could he speak if he did not touch them together?
my brain at 2 am: **What exactly is fire and why does it glow**
I can't wait until I'm far enough into my education to learn and understand the math and experimentation behind subatomic particle physics :D I'M SO EXCITED (and impatient) ...just thought I'd mention that because this video reminded me to be curious and ask questions :)
So, after 6 years, is your passion still burning? Just curious
I love your way to explain. Thanks for the videos
great explanation
Thank you for an excellent video.🔬
why is no one talking about how Don just firebended on video? What really is going on at fermilab?
just found this channel. awesome.
1:18 The trouble with terms like “element” and “atom” is that, almost as soon as we give them to something, we discover that that thing is not so “elementary” or “atomic” after all, and can be broken down into smaller pieces ...
awsome many thanks for sharing. you don't believe but I'm really excited and don't know how to share these emotions by understanding these
Dear Don Lincoln, could you, please, elaborate on how particle exchange can explain the action of forces? For example, it is easy to see the repulsion as it was demonstrated in this video, but how about the attractive forces, how do we explain with particle exchange? Would the boat have to through a sack away from person on the shore? How does particle conservation apply to this context?
Very clean presentation
Its the first video i have watched from this channel n i subscribed ...😃😀
Thank you for posting this video.
where cane I find all 100s types of found sub partials name other then 6 quacks and leptons ???
I imagine a world where we slowly learn to manipulate and control smaller realms of matter. From chemistry and nano-tech today which harnesses and arranges atoms, to perhaps one day being able to control and manipulate these quarks and other particles, to whatever is inside/hidden under them when we learn to manipulate them.
I hope the trail never ends... or stops getting smaller.
Amazing video just inspired me to keep studying physics
same
Since you have already started, now it is more like a hostage situation ;)
Crystal clear. In my case I've discovered the ultimate "particle" of particles, which I think (and I find no other) is the most elementary building block of all what IS. I'm trying to write a paper to publish this "discovery". Hoping it's not rejected by Elseviere (SCOPUS).
kewl
:'( if i can go back in time i wouldn't choose to study chemistry :'( i would go with particule physics..... thank you for all this informations.
Anass Oujaha lol I feel the same I studied marine science, which I really love, but if I could go back I would study physics
well we will never stop reading about physics right? no matter what i study partical physics will always still my first love haha
Can't you go back? Go to college again?
Thank god u Made a video sir otherwise I was in confusion
Brilliantly explained.
Simply the best
Excellent presentation sir
I have a question, since all things are made of proton neutron electron, and now we know it are based on smaller building blocks explained by the standard model, where do all this particles come from? Can we build these particles, thus we can somewhat create something out of nothing?
Fantastic video!
He is seriously good. Just sublime.
Fermilab scientists know what gravity is.
It is a partial entanglement phenomenon.
It so rare and weak because it is rare entanglements and partial entanglemets
to break, well it happens but at very lower rates.
partial entanglements are easily to DEGRADE than pure entanglements among only two particles.
A partial entanglement of many particles has a lower degrading threshold level,
and even the quantum noise level of the void affects it.
If we heat something it becomes heavier because we allow
partial entanglements degrade at faster rates, but not way faster
except in neutron stars, compressed plasma black hole accretion disk etc.
Each new partial entanglement degrades at a more stable quantum state,
but not all energy is transformed into motion, some is spread out as heat.
Of course we have statistically some few pure entanglements, but even them may
degrade, but in that case not with an interaction with a field as partially entangled particels
or with random low quantum noise of the void, but with moving partially entangled particles
or purely entangle particles that crush on the purely entangled one.
I want to that Fermilab for explaining what gravity really is!!!
these guys have relly TOP iq !!!
ok, the Fermigravity or Entanglogravity is one option,
we also have chromogravity [MIT about chomatic information shared partially to other particles
and not only inside one] but some scientists claim
that both theories are the same mathematically
entanglogravity is way simpler though [just a different flavour as many claim]
Nice format.
A video on flavor symmetry would be cool.
Hi, and I would like to ask: I would like to take a shot at some of the problems presented, but to whom would I send my approach?
Thanks a lot, excellent , beautifully explained
Thank you so much....great explanation
Only great minds able to simplify