It would be fun if Paul overdubbed some acoustic guitar/ bass and Ringo tapped out a rhythm for it. The original vocals would be WAY easier to restore and technically it would still be the Beatles.
@@mesier Keep in mind, Paul & Ringo ARE the Beatles.The group always overdubbed and added to records. As long as it's them, what's wrong with more Beatles content?
Show me where I said The problem is ''Paul & Ringo ARE the Beatles''. I'm just saying that my opinion is: The song is precious and beautiful the way it is, their young voices, raw recording without editing or overdubbing the pure and beautiful portrait of a song of that time when they weren't studio musicians yet. What makes that recording so precious are these characteristics. And I agree that if they remastered the recording, it would be great, better quality! But overdubbing and putting more unnecessary ingredients on top... I understand that would be interesting... but, no. @@MrKeychange
I guarantee it won't sound as good as remixing it from the remastered original multitrack tape. AI isn't good enough to reconstruct a multitrack master from a finished product. About all it's good for is removing vocals from a song to make a karaoke track, and even then it doesn't do a perfect job.
The remixing is welcomed since the songs sound crystal clear and sounds previously buried are now heard. But for me it’s all about the outtakes and that’s why the white album and Revolver 50th have become my favorites. Hearing the band run through the songs in early takes with guide vocals is placing yourself in the studio as these gems were being created. So I hope we get a lot of Take 1’s in the Rubber Soul set. Even if they are breakdowns there’s something magical at hearing these early attempts and discussions and count ins. Revolver had a lot of these gems.
Sounds previously buried were meant to be buried. It’s a travesty imo, like adjusting the tint on the mona lisa and claiming it brings out colors previously buried
Don't confuse remaster with remix. A remaster is just taking an analog tape and making a digital copy. Remixing is when you change the original recording by either changing the sound of the instruments with the mixing board or editing The original tracks.
Great video! I’d really love to see Giles Martin tackle all the “non-pepper” 1967 tracks before diving into the red/blue albums. I feel that both Magical Mystery Tour and Yellow Submarine have some of the sloppiest stereo mixes that are begging for a cleanup.
I Am the Walrus really needs a remix, as does Revolution. The 2015 remasters of Lady Madonna and Hey Jude [from "1"] sound good. Not sure how they can be improved.
@@TheAerovons Perhaps. I don't know if there is enough to warrant a big box for Rubber Soul, but the thought occurred to me they could do the deep dive for Rubber Soul AND Help in the same package.
If there's a Rubber Soul box set, they simply must include the bootlegged-sessions montage for "Think For Yourself". I'd had it on a bootleg CD for years and now the track doesn't play anymore - although the rest of the tracks are still working.
Sorry to see all the negative comments. This is a well put together video, summarising all the info we know at this point, and includes some sensible speculation. Well done!
IM NOW SUBSCRIBED.THIS IS WHAT WE WANT IN VIDEOS, SORRY BUT PERSONALLY I NEVER LIKED THE ALBUMS BUT IN COMPUTER SOUNDS AND THAT KIND OF STUFF.BUT WHEN YOU GET INTO THIS STUFF IM HERE. THANK YOU
I have the red and blue albums and they're great, but Rubber Soul is my favorite. I was SO hoping it would be the next release. I actually haven't heard Now and Then, so I'm waiting to form an opinion on it.
I am a bit disappointed that Rubber Soul, apparently, will not be released this year. I suppose the Red & Blue Albums would be interesting to hear, however, I still prefer the actual Beatles' albums being remixed instead. When all of The Beatles' albums have been remixed and released, then, begin releasing the Red & Blue albums & Past Masters. No matter, I will still buy the next remixed release. (I do like the fact that they are adding two extra albums to the Red & Blue sets.)
I am all for the remixes of the red and blue albums, and some additional songs. The Beatles used to come out with two albums plus new singles every year. Apple should also be doing that, and not keep us waiting till the end of each year to get new remixes. We original Beatles fans are not getting any younger you know.
I really liked what you said, even though it's only a guess. I myself would like to see the Please please me album get a remix plus bonus material, since it was the first album. Oh and thank you
Robert Gowen (who has posted elsewhere in the comments) is right. We used to buy a couple of albums, a number of EP's and singles every year, plus the Beatles Book (magazine), fan club membership and an occasional 'something else,' (like the charity album with "Across The Universe" on it, Cream's "Badge," with George playing and co-writing, etc.). It's time to speed up the releases so that those of us who were there at the beginning are still here and can get them too. AND, how about using the new technology to sort out the 'Live at the Star Club' recordings? All those wonderful songs (like 'Red Sails in the Sunset,' etc.) that aren't available on anything else.
It's a bit like when you've already got a phone contract - You get put on the backburner while they focus on attracting new customers with lots of new offers etc. Likewise, those of us who are established fans of The Beatles, are made to wait for Rubber Soul, while they try to get new fans through the door. They know we'll still be here next year, so they can take us for granted.
I have an “theory” Last weeks of September-October: The Last Beatle Song releases November: Red and Blue album remix + added songs December: Rubber Soul 2023 remix “Theory 2” The last Beatle “song(s)” will be either an EP or album since it doesn’t make sense to finish a music era with a single (MY IDEA for a EP) Side 1: McCartney: She’s A Friend of Dorothy Starr: Watching Rainbows Side 2: Harrison: Cosmic Empire Lennon: Now and Then
Great video!!!! I'd like to see Harrison's 1964 track "You Know What To Do" completed!! It already has George, Paul & John on it. With some drums from Ringo, some additional guitar from Paul & some finishing off - that would be a REAL Beatles track from the era!!
I somehow missed "you know what to do " Where did That, come from.??? I don't think I've ever seen it mentioned, or heard either, ! So Clue me In!!!!!! 1964,Which Album????
@@richardgann5400 It was George's composition for "A Hard Days Night" album. It featured George on vocals & acoustic guitar, John on tambourine & Paul on bass. Ringo did not appear as he was sick with tonsilitis. Unfortunately the song never got any further than a demo version - so therefore was never finished. It was supposed to be the 14th track on A Hard Days Night - possibly.
Thanks for the video! I personally was really hoping the new song would be part of a remastered, new box set of the ANTHOLOGY albums (maybe released with a new HD version of the original ANTHOLOGY documentary series for Blu-Ray and streaming). Do you think ANTHOLOGY might be revisited at some point?
I think that might of honestly been a better idea. An anthology 4 album with the new song and stuff that was left out of the original anthologies. I would love to see the documentary remastered and perhaps even expanded.
This is being done for artistic reasons as well as making money. If they intend to remix everything anyway, then they may as well remix the tracks from Red and Blue first and make money from that, then release the other albums later so that fans buy the same tracks twice. Red and Blue are a good introduction for new fans, so get them out first because they will make great Chrissy presents. Young fans will mostly stream them, but oldies will buy them as presents for kids. And of course oldies who want Now And Then and are impatient for new remixes will buy Red and Blue for themselves. Then release Rubber Soul next year, followed by the other albums. Maximise the sales.
They'd wanna make lots of bank by releasing both a new compilation and Rubber Soul remix. After all, the Singles Box Set got released after Abbey Road's remix, so I wouldn't be surprised if they did the same strategy again
Why not remix the complete Dig it version of 15 minutes long? I know this is not a popular track but i like it very much. The problem is heather's screaming over the twist and shout segment: i would not remove completely but put it in the background so we can hear john and george voices!
Now that is my only critisism of the Beatles tracks that have been done using the Demix Technology. "Revolver" could have been so much better if the guitars had been separated on various songs - such as "And Your Bird Can Sing". I've been involved with this technology for years & it CAN be done!!
I can hear all the guitar parts in "And Your Bird Can Sing, and have learned to play them. It's just layered guitars playing the same notes between the 3 of them, it sounds like to me, anyway.Great Song!!
@@richardgann5400 Bird: it's two guitars - Paul and George playing them. For it's time a pretty good solo section. How about the bridge guitar work?! You get that too?
I don;t know why nobody is talking about George Martins interview back in the 90s in one of the British mags , I think it was Mojo or the other mag owned by them but he talks about that they did record true stereo masters on the original 4 tracks of the first Beatles 4 LPs. They never bothered with them to mix because their focus was on mono mixes but George Martin said EMI in the future was going to remaster and remix the masters to true stereo but it never happened. The tapes are still in the vaults. Thats where they should put their focus on and let Giles Martin work on it.
MAYBE with this de-mix AI technology they can revamp the old quarrymen songs, not just That'll be the day/In spite of all the dinger, but also some of the songs/demos recorded at Pauls house in 1960
This year is the 60th anniversary of the Beatles exploding onto the world. I was expecting Apple to make more of it whilst there are still two Beatles left. Sad to say, they’re unlikely to still be with us when the 70th anniversary arrives. So I was hoping for a 1963 box set. I’m disappointed it’s not happened.
Personally, I think the What Goes On Demo should be on a Please Please Me box set and not Rubber Soul as it was recorded at that time. Putting it in a Rubber Soul boxset would be like putting the original 1963 recording of One After 909 in the Let It Be boxset.
What I mostly want is a vinyl box set for each of the early Beatles albums up to and including Rubber Soul. I also really wish their was a proper vinyl box set for The White Album. I didn’t have interest in getting the current vinyl box set just to get acoustic demos. I didn’t bother with the CD box set because I want Vinyl, but some of those studio tales are really amazing and I wish they were pressed to vinyl. And perhaps maybe even a Sgt. Pepper’s vinyl box set, since they only issed a 2LP(with only 1 LP worth of outtakes).
The Beatles anthology albums need to be remixed and remastered. The new song can then be added to Anthology 3 as track 1. These albums are holy grail Beatles material and truly deserve the Giles Martin treatment using AI technology
It’s nice that they truly digitally remix these. However, do not forget the 45s we bought in the 60s, the mono mixes. Those were the hits! Do not just made slick expensive packages for EMI to make more money off the Beatles! One day we’ll want or I will want, the original mono mixes as they were! Those played on Hifi equipment and AM radio? That IS the Beatles!!! The covers! The news of that era! And whatever tv shows they played on….! The trailers for the movies! Articles in the newspapers about them and their travels, their tours! That’s Beatlemaina! And the first 1964, Beatles items! The ads in the record stores for their current album! All that, that’s the Beatles! No one today understands Beatlemaina. You had to be there! I can tell you!
I really don't think that it's down to mixing difficulties and its more the fact they had this last minute idea to do the red and blue albums but I guess we will never really know
@@clynaack anything is possible really. I’m just hoping that they will include some rare unreleased tracks like carnival of light that aren’t related to any particular album.
I have purchased the remixed records. While it is nice to hear better stereo mixes etc. What it gets down to for me is the music...and that can not be improved on. I get as much enjoyment from my original vinyl as I do the 1986 cds and the new versions.
I can see, in another 30 or 40 years, The Beatles' catalog will be on something like remix version 13.0 or 14.0. What will be interesting at that point (I won't be alive to see it) will be to hunt down the original 60s (ver. 1.0) mixes and compare them to the 2063 "current" mix. Will they be so completely changed as to be unrecognizable? Personally, I've always been four-square against any remixes, except in rare cases to fix an obvious original mix error. But, I've been overwhelmingly outvoted in this by the remaining Beatles themselves, their labels and publishers -- not to mention the general public, who are probably into remixes by a 90/10 vote. It's as if the art that was The Beatles multi-track masters are the world's to play around with, not something sacred and special. It's almost that we're saying to The Beatles and to George Martin that what they gave us, '62 to '70, wasn't good enough the first time and can be improved upon. Oh well. Vox populi.
Well if you don't like the new mixes there's nothing stopping you from going back and listening to whatever mix you enjoy the most and I think people often forget that
Ive got a bone to pick about Mr. Martin's re-mix of "Day In The Life " If you have ever heard the original version, there is a break between John's part before Paul comes in with a Whole Different song, entirely!!!! Now, on the original verson in this break,before Paul comes in, there is an "ALARM CLOCK " ringing. Now, on the 2017 verson, the Alarm Clock is GONE!!!! Why????? How in the Blue Perfect Hell did he Not Know It was Missing!!!!???? Jeez!!! Put It Back, Please!!!!!!!
Some of the songs on sgt pepper have been renamed to "2017 mix" instead of the original "remix" on spotify. I believe those are the ones set to appear on the red and blue albums
I'm tired of all the press saying that the original stereo mixes weren't "proper" stereo mixes. Though I think the separation of sounds from a mono source is a fantastic advancement and provides new possibilities for new stereo remixes, after reviewing several of the new mixes, I prefer the original mixes a lot of the time. IMHO, The BEST thing that can be done is release the separated tracks and let fans have fun and mix for themselves. You know people are doing it anyway; why not sell them the source material legitimately?
They weren't proper stereo mixes... if you call a unsupervised whacking of random instruments completely to the left or right proper then just keep listening to those versions I guess
I want the rare stereo outtake of George Martin farting in the control booth during take 17 of “Run For Your Life”, just prior to shitting himself due to John’s lyrics. I’m hoping AI technology can isolate and enhance this treasure and really bring out the bass tones - perhaps adding some possible phasing so we can hear the fart in 360 stereo sound? There are so many possibilities for us fans!!
Forget Red and Blue. What I know for fact is that using newly found tapes Please Please Me single will be rereleased in surround 64-channels ATMOS. Stay tuned!
What? Who said anything about changing the guitar solo on let it be lol it was recorded decades ago George isn't exactly going to rise from the grave and re record it lol
Personally, and this is just my opinion, the music was great the way it was originally made. I don’t need the music that affected me when I was young to be run through A.I. programs, pitch correct, or auto-tune, or having parts added that were never there in the final release. I speak only for meself when I say this. What made the classics so dearly important was that they were made by human beings and the imperfections inherent in their designs only endeared them more and more. But I also get that this is part of the “consumerist” game as well. What we truly need in the world of popular music....is something new. And, I will always love the Beatles music.
What are you on about a Beatles remix or remaster has never had "pitch correct, or auto-tune, or having parts added that were never there in the final release". The whole point of the de-mix ai is pretty much to separate the old masters that were limited and recorded on two or four track recorders so they can now be given the proper stereo mix treatment.
@@clynaack ……Bloody oath....They aren’t re-releasing this stuff with simply George’s bloody sneeze included. I’m sure big bucks and and big bucks tech will be employed in all areas. It will have all the trimmings surely.
@@clynaack That's certainly not the case with Now and Then. You talked about them changing the pitch on the original harmonies recorded for Because to suit the "new" song. And this opens the gates for completely new "Beatles songs" to be created in the future. They can always say they just used the original recordings!
That's not what is meant by "pitch correct" pitch correct is where you take a vocal and shift each part of it putting it into a completely different key that wouldn't of matched up with it if the part as a whole was shifted. Its pretty much like a manual autotune. Pitch shifting is like the more basic version of that its like when you speed up or slow down a tape its pitch shifts. Like what they did on Rain where the drums and Bass was played at a faster speed so it could be slowed therefore shifting the pitch. Idk I feel they are quite different and its important to note that.
@@clynaack ……Ok, sorry for the extreme lateness, but, here it goes. Auto - Tune is a program used during a performance and Pitch Correct is used in POST production. Nuff said. Both of those programs are digital applications with the same end-game: changing what “is” into what it “isn’t” (*bloody never was). My post was not about one or the other, it was the fact that anyone chooses either at all trying to pass that off as a “true performance” (and you can throw in using pre-recorded tracks live to hide weak vocal and/or instrumental versions [*see classic Top of the Pops performances by Nirvana and New Order choosing to “mainly,” not completely, perform live - with Kurt Cobain taking the piss out of his performance live). Personally, and again this is just my opinion, any “performers” relying on those in order to make art are not fully performing.
They need to use the remastered multitrack tape. Artificial intelligence can't remix something that's already been mixed. When you use AI to deconstruct a final mix, you don't get the same tracks that are on the original master.
the problem is though the original master tapes are often (at least early on) 2-4 tracks and their is a lot more than 2-4 things going on at once. I dont get why people are seriously hating on this ai when all its doing is providing a way to split it all into its individual instruments for the first time... it either shows the lack of proactiveness (I think this is mainly in older Beatles fans) or the fact that people hear AI and dont do any research whatsoever and just assume its bad.
@@clynaack Who said I didn't like it? The point I was trying to make was: when does a piece of music stop being a composition by the original artist, and start being a collaboration with the "re-interpreter"? When does it stop being what the original artist intended it to be?
Nice video, but.... "lack of singles"? So many people keep suggesting the expanded red and blue albums will now have space for singles which weren't on the original versions........ ......and they are most certainly referring to "A" sides. What singles were missed on those compilations? Since everything is forever based on the "thou shalt not scrutinize the UK releases", all the "as they intended" "A" sides were included. The "double A sides" are there too. Even the dreaded "how dare they release that as a 45" unique US #1's as well.
@@clynaack Which early singles are you referring to? Things like "My Bonnie"? That has zero place on these sets. "Quite a few here and there"...... Where? Every major UK "A" side is included on the albums. There's also the unique US #1 hits as well. "B" sides, yes. That's all what's lacking 45 wise.
@@clynaack how so? That’s an original album. Hits collections were good when we had to buy physical media but now we can listen to anything anytime just stick to original releases. Not against remixing just hits collections.
yeah but what's the point of remastering rubber soul when you can just "listen to anything anytime"... I tell you why! the exact reason they want to remaster the red and blue albums and thats for for a new mix. If you think about it is a really good way of doing things as its just going to give us a look into the future of how the new mixes will sound. You shouldnt be against it because all its really doing is providing even more Beatles content even if we now have to wait a little longer for the next one but hey we wouldnt be beatles fans if we didnt have patience amirite. At the end of the day if you dont like it then dont buy it because like you said you can just listen to it on a streaming service.
It seems to me there is this hidden wish among those wanting all these remixes etc... The Beatles are no more ,have everyone come to terms with that. Or is it the passing of your own years that is hard to deal with. I love The Beatles have hundreds of hours of recording sessions etc... But continuing to purchase the same songs over and over again seems mad. I like most people purchasing these records can remember The Beatles being a band and the musical act parents hated and feared their influence on all the kids. They were considered the bad influence of the time. As for The Beatles I say Live and Let Die .Because, All Things Must Pass.
For me these remixes are great because I'm a new generation Beatles fan and don't have many original pressings. So to get a nice newly mixed version with loads of extra material and for not much more than an original press is pretty nice
You can be a purist all you want, but the Beatles used to mess with ALL the vocals and ALL the instruments back in the day. They are now breaking ground on AI. It shouldn't be shocking to anyone who loves the Beatles. They should de-age Paul's vocals if he put new ones on the new song.
I disagree I think Paul de-aging his vocals is a step too far. At that point just sing it in his current voice even if he's getting a little old because de-aging won't exactly make his singing any better unless they end up doing more to it like pitch correction and autotune and I really think that is going well overboard . If he's going to sing new vocals it should just be plain and simple because if anything it makes it more human and more meaningful. (I'm assuming that you know how the whole AI de-aging vocals process works)
I've heard some cool de-aged Paulie stuff so if they needed to get a back up right, I'm all for it. Are you for using the harmonies on "Because"?. That's "cheating", too, because it's not 1969. If they've come this far with it to have an unreleased John song with all of them on it, then do whatever it takes. @@clynaack
I don't think that using harmonys from because is cheating whatsoever since it is all real vocals de-aging pretty much takes a vocals that Paul has recorded now and makes a whole new one using the old as information for the tone pitch and melody. Completely different thing if you ask me
I think it is whatever it is to Beatles fans. The Beatles did so many songs where their voices were slowed down, sped up, run through a speaker, etc. that you can BET they would've utilized AI if it was around in the 60's and 70's @@clynaack
I really dont get it how has any integrity been lost... you know full well that if stuff like this was around in the beatles prime they would of been first to mess with it
Hopefully none. I have been buying their singles and albums since "She Loves You" came out in the US in 1963 (I was 13 so just at the right age to gah gah over the Fab Four--as they would soon be known) and my devotion has n ot wavered in the years since. I was in the fan club, had the posters, bought EVERY record, 8-Trach, Cassette, CD and... now mp3s. It's time that whoever is in charge of all this started giving us aging fans some free upgrades. We could have ended World Hunger with the money kids in the US ALONE spent on all this let alone the worldwide revenues they have raked in.(And that doesn't even include the "Cancel Culture Kids of 1966" who destroyed all their Beatles Memorabilia because Joh once quipped that The Beatle were more popular than Jesus" and then had to buy all that stuff again at twice the price after they came to their senses. He nevr said they were more important. He said more popular, which given all the non-Christians both in the US and around the world they probably were.
Why do people even care about the red and blue albums when the original albums and singles are readily available and as the band originally intended? Cash grab for all involved, that’s the answer.
It makes sense because not only does it give a place to release Now and Then but a nice look at what all the future mixes would sound like. I think its also good to have as a way to introduce new Beatles fans that will inevitably come from Now and Then to the Beatles
What? How is it "degenerate garbage"? It's still the same songs but with in my opinion improved stereo mixing... I think its wild to be so mean over something so opinionated. What ever happened to what the Beatles taught us about peace and love.
As someone who must be one of the first second-generation Beatlefans ever, I've been listening to The Beatles and their solo work since the 1970s. And it is my opinion that "Now And Then" is one of the best ballads that John Lennon has ever written. Maybe you should wait until you hear the finished version before you pass such judgment about it being crap. Really, all you've heard of it up till now are demos, covers, and mashups.
With streaming services, these albums have no purpose. This will never happen. At least I hope it doesn’t, complete waste of time and better Beatle things to spend the effort on.
In my opinion these still have loads of value over a streaming service such as sound quality and the fact that they are physical and can be a real object in your collection
Never liked compilations . Especially not by THEM. Listening parts from White album , Pepper , Abbey Road , Please Please me etc like that? Yes , if you're begginer with them . New track , great , but other is just golddigger stuff . Don't really care about delaying Rubber Soul , until they keep releasing albums like that , someone might be gone . Big NO to $300 per double Red or Blue vinyl. Beside the mish mash compilations , colored vinyl is worst . Good luck
Paul gets older....new solo album never . Ringo is senile as i saw at Mary McCartney documentary on Abbey Road studio . He didn't remember nothing and he's shaky and senile as Brian Wilson. 83 years old ? Time to retire , or pushing 150 , Richard ?
If you were a figure as historical and as influential as Paul or Ringo you wouldn't want to stop because you enjoy making people happy. I really don't get the purpose of saying shit like this about them because at the end of the day they are doing what they enjoy and no one can stop them or change their minds. It seams like your just a miserable old man trying to make people feel the same way as you... if you ask me you sound like your just a jealous guy. So please for the sake of being a decent human being just be nice for once in your life.... Its really not that hard and you will be rewarded.
I hope “In Spite Of All The Danger” will get remastered with this technology some day.
That would be amazing
It would be fun if Paul overdubbed some acoustic guitar/ bass and Ringo tapped out a rhythm for it. The original vocals would be WAY easier to restore and technically it would still be the Beatles.
@@MrKeychange That record must stay the way it is. To get remastered alright, but overdubbing, no!
@@mesier Keep in mind, Paul & Ringo ARE the Beatles.The group always overdubbed and added to records. As long as it's them, what's wrong with more Beatles content?
Show me where I said The problem is ''Paul & Ringo ARE the Beatles''. I'm just saying that my opinion is: The song is precious and beautiful the way it is, their young voices, raw recording without editing or overdubbing the pure and beautiful portrait of a song of that time when they weren't studio musicians yet. What makes that recording so precious are these characteristics. And I agree that if they remastered the recording, it would be great, better quality! But overdubbing and putting more unnecessary ingredients on top... I understand that would be interesting... but, no. @@MrKeychange
I think the AI thing separating the different tracks is so darn cool. What amazing technology.
it really is! cant wait for the day where it becomes publicly available (to the level Peter Jacksons tech I mean)
I guarantee it won't sound as good as remixing it from the remastered original multitrack tape. AI isn't good enough to reconstruct a multitrack master from a finished product. About all it's good for is removing vocals from a song to make a karaoke track, and even then it doesn't do a perfect job.
@@willdwyer6782not very creative are you 😂
@@clynaackwhy not putting Green album fill up with Yoko Ono Plastic idiot band as "new album" ? It always reminds me on sound torture in Vietnam
wtf are you on about?
The remixing is welcomed since the songs sound crystal clear and sounds previously buried are now heard. But for me it’s all about the outtakes and that’s why the white album and Revolver 50th have become my favorites. Hearing the band run through the songs in early takes with guide vocals is placing yourself in the studio as these gems were being created. So I hope we get a lot of Take 1’s in the Rubber Soul set. Even if they are breakdowns there’s something magical at hearing these early attempts and discussions and count ins. Revolver had a lot of these gems.
Well said!
Sounds previously buried were meant to be buried. It’s a travesty imo, like adjusting the tint on the mona lisa and claiming it brings out colors previously buried
Don't confuse remaster with remix. A remaster is just taking an analog tape and making a digital copy. Remixing is when you change the original recording by either changing the sound of the instruments with the mixing board or editing The original tracks.
@@willdwyer6782a remaster is the last stage where you set the levels on everything so it sound good on every stereo/headset
Not very many outtakes on Rubber Soul. Most tracks were less than 3 takes. Wouldlove to hear Norwegian take 3, though.
Give the people what they want and crave: A Rubber Soul remix!
Great video!
I’d really love to see Giles Martin tackle all the “non-pepper” 1967 tracks before diving into the red/blue albums. I feel that both Magical Mystery Tour and Yellow Submarine have some of the sloppiest stereo mixes that are begging for a cleanup.
I fully agree
I Am the Walrus really needs a remix, as does Revolution. The 2015 remasters of Lady Madonna and Hey Jude [from "1"] sound good. Not sure how they can be improved.
@@TajBlues The Red and Blue should be really low priority, just greatest hits albums. Would rather hear RS and Help anyway.....
@@TheAerovons Perhaps. I don't know if there is enough to warrant a big box for Rubber Soul, but the thought occurred to me they could do the deep dive for Rubber Soul AND Help in the same package.
If there's a Rubber Soul box set, they simply must include the bootlegged-sessions montage for "Think For Yourself". I'd had it on a bootleg CD for years and now the track doesn't play anymore - although the rest of the tracks are still working.
That's super cool 100% needs to be included
they also need to include carnival of light
They will have to as those sessions don't have a lot of outtakes.
@theunknown9437 carnival of light is a pre pepper era song it would 100% not be in the rubber soul boxset
Sorry to see all the negative comments. This is a well put together video, summarising all the info we know at this point, and includes some sensible speculation. Well done!
Much appreciated!
I'd love to finally see an official stereo remix of Love Me Do and She Loves You for starters, including their b-sides.
IM NOW SUBSCRIBED.THIS IS WHAT WE WANT IN VIDEOS, SORRY BUT PERSONALLY I NEVER LIKED THE ALBUMS BUT IN COMPUTER SOUNDS AND THAT KIND OF STUFF.BUT WHEN YOU GET INTO THIS STUFF IM HERE. THANK YOU
I would love to see a remix of the rubber soul and a volume three of the capitol albums!
Brother I would literally kill for Norwegian Wood Take 3, I remember listening to take 2 two years ago and feeling I just discovered heaven
The rubber soul remix is something i would buy though
I have the red and blue albums and they're great, but Rubber Soul is my favorite. I was SO hoping it would be the next release. I actually haven't heard Now and Then, so I'm waiting to form an opinion on it.
I am a bit disappointed that Rubber Soul, apparently, will not be released this year. I suppose the Red & Blue Albums would be interesting to hear, however, I still prefer the actual Beatles' albums being remixed instead. When all of The Beatles' albums have been remixed and released, then, begin releasing the Red & Blue albums & Past Masters. No matter, I will still buy the next remixed release. (I do like the fact that they are adding two extra albums to the Red & Blue sets.)
I am so excited for Now and Then and video, will be best Beatles day ever!
Yeah im excited and intrigued what they will do for it
Please, folks, I'm on a Very, Very limited income, and I can't afford All of these Redoing Everything!!!!
@@richardgann5400 listen on utube......
I am all for the remixes of the red and blue albums, and some additional songs. The Beatles used to come out with two albums plus new singles every year. Apple should also be doing that, and not keep us waiting till the end of each year to get new remixes. We original Beatles fans are not getting any younger you know.
A Big,AMEN, to That!!!!! (when I'm 64) hehehe.
If they get as many live performances on CD whilst isolating the screaming audience that would be a great album.
I really liked what you said, even though it's only a guess. I myself would like to see the Please please me album get a remix plus bonus material, since it was the first album. Oh and thank you
Excited. Hopeful.
Hope that Twist and Shout , Roll over Beethoven and Money make the Red Album -Classic Covers by the Fab Four
Agreed would also love to see long tall sally and kansas city
@clynaack - Loved those Early EPs with the cover versions - my older sister had bought them
Robert Gowen (who has posted elsewhere in the comments) is right. We used to buy a couple of albums, a number of EP's and singles every year, plus the Beatles Book (magazine), fan club membership and an occasional 'something else,' (like the charity album with "Across The Universe" on it, Cream's "Badge," with George playing and co-writing, etc.). It's time to speed up the releases so that those of us who were there at the beginning are still here and can get them too. AND, how about using the new technology to sort out the 'Live at the Star Club' recordings? All those wonderful songs (like 'Red Sails in the Sunset,' etc.) that aren't available on anything else.
Yeah, Please, the Star Club I had, is Terrible!!!!!! That Needs a Lot of Help!!!
It's a bit like when you've already got a phone contract - You get put on the backburner while they focus on attracting new customers with lots of new offers etc. Likewise, those of us who are established fans of The Beatles, are made to wait for Rubber Soul, while they try to get new fans through the door. They know we'll still be here next year, so they can take us for granted.
Yeah in some ways that sucks but im ok with it to be honest. The more people who know about this bands fab work the better!!
@@clynaack True, but if people don't know about The Beatles, then frankly their parents have failed.
I don't think it's as simple as that lol
I have an “theory”
Last weeks of September-October: The Last Beatle Song releases
November: Red and Blue album remix + added songs
December: Rubber Soul 2023 remix
“Theory 2”
The last Beatle “song(s)” will be either an EP or album since it doesn’t make sense to finish a music era with a single
(MY IDEA for a EP)
Side 1:
McCartney: She’s A Friend of Dorothy
Starr: Watching Rainbows
Side 2:
Harrison: Cosmic Empire
Lennon: Now and Then
That would be awesome
Will someone Clue me in about All Of these Songs, I've Never Heard Of, Ever!!! I must have traveled to that Galaxy, far,far, Away.
@@richardgann5400 most of what I mentioned are demos
Great video!!!! I'd like to see Harrison's 1964 track "You Know What To Do" completed!! It already has George, Paul & John on it. With some drums from Ringo, some additional guitar from Paul & some finishing off - that would be a REAL Beatles track from the era!!
That would be cool!
I can't see that ever happening.
I somehow missed "you know what to do " Where did That, come from.??? I don't think I've ever seen it mentioned, or heard either, ! So Clue me In!!!!!! 1964,Which Album????
@@richardgann5400 It was George's composition for "A Hard Days Night" album. It featured George on vocals & acoustic guitar, John on tambourine & Paul on bass. Ringo did not appear as he was sick with tonsilitis. Unfortunately the song never got any further than a demo version - so therefore was never finished. It was supposed to be the 14th track on A Hard Days Night - possibly.
@richardgann5400 its on anthology one if your interested!
Thanks for the video! I personally was really hoping the new song would be part of a remastered, new box set of the ANTHOLOGY albums (maybe released with a new HD version of the original ANTHOLOGY documentary series for Blu-Ray and streaming). Do you think ANTHOLOGY might be revisited at some point?
I think that might of honestly been a better idea. An anthology 4 album with the new song and stuff that was left out of the original anthologies. I would love to see the documentary remastered and perhaps even expanded.
Giles martin the master of the re-master
If they are remixing Rubber Soul I’m just curious what the remixed “I’m Looking Through You” will sound
This is being done for artistic reasons as well as making money. If they intend to remix everything anyway, then they may as well remix the tracks from Red and Blue first and make money from that, then release the other albums later so that fans buy the same tracks twice. Red and Blue are a good introduction for new fans, so get them out first because they will make great Chrissy presents. Young fans will mostly stream them, but oldies will buy them as presents for kids. And of course oldies who want Now And Then and are impatient for new remixes will buy Red and Blue for themselves. Then release Rubber Soul next year, followed by the other albums. Maximise the sales.
I really REALLY hope that Johnny B. Goode is gonna be in that 3rd LP
Thanks alot for this promising oversight. What's your vision about a future Mind Games box set? It was kind of expected to arrive this year.
Not too sure about any of the solo box sets if I'm totally honest but perhaps it's something that I should look into for the future
Thanks again. I looking forward to what's coming.@@clynaack
We need canival and now and then on a single so they actually feel like part of the 2019 set
Ever noticed how these things always appear before Christmas?
Yeah makes a lovely Christmas present
They'd wanna make lots of bank by releasing both a new compilation and Rubber Soul remix. After all, the Singles Box Set got released after Abbey Road's remix, so I wouldn't be surprised if they did the same strategy again
Why not remix the complete Dig it version of 15 minutes long? I know this is not a popular track but i like it very much. The problem is heather's screaming over the twist and shout segment: i would not remove completely but put it in the background so we can hear john and george voices!
Yeah that's really cool.. isn't it on the let it be box set.. I'm not sure
Separate the guitars. That they are together was because of Mono. But it's good / better to hear them separately
Now that is my only critisism of the Beatles tracks that have been done using the Demix Technology. "Revolver" could have been so much better if the guitars had been separated on various songs - such as "And Your Bird Can Sing". I've been involved with this technology for years & it CAN be done!!
How can it be better than shat the artists intended. If the Beatles wanted to have mixed in stereo they would have
I can hear all the guitar parts in "And Your Bird Can Sing, and have learned to play them. It's just layered guitars playing the same notes between the 3 of them, it sounds like to me, anyway.Great Song!!
@@richardgann5400 Bird: it's two guitars - Paul and George playing them. For it's time a pretty good solo section. How about the bridge guitar work?! You get that too?
I don;t know why nobody is talking about George Martins interview back in the 90s in one of the British mags , I think it was Mojo or the other mag owned by them but he talks about that they did record true stereo masters on the original 4 tracks of the first Beatles 4 LPs. They never bothered with them to mix because their focus was on mono mixes but George Martin said EMI in the future was going to remaster and remix the masters to true stereo but it never happened. The tapes are still in the vaults. Thats where they should put their focus on and let Giles Martin work on it.
Interesting information
Rubber soul. PLEAAASE Rubber soul.
MAYBE with this de-mix AI technology they can revamp the old quarrymen songs, not just That'll be the day/In spite of all the dinger, but also some of the songs/demos recorded at Pauls house in 1960
This year is the 60th anniversary of the Beatles exploding onto the world. I was expecting Apple to make more of it whilst there are still two Beatles left. Sad to say, they’re unlikely to still be with us when the 70th anniversary arrives. So I was hoping for a 1963 box set. I’m disappointed it’s not happened.
Release/Remaster all Pro-Shot live shows including SHEA STADIUM shows
That has to happen!!!
What about the Shea stadium concert? A release of it restored and with any unused footage coupled with a multi view option would be great.
Agreed that would be awesome
What about the rumored solo box sets- Ringo album, Mind Games, London Town, Living in the Material World etc.
I don't really know much about the solo box sets so I'll have to look into them but it sounds really cool
Mueh..
Personally, I think the What Goes On Demo should be on a Please Please Me box set and not Rubber Soul as it was recorded at that time. Putting it in a Rubber Soul boxset would be like putting the original 1963 recording of One After 909 in the Let It Be boxset.
Yeah that makes more sense
What I mostly want is a vinyl box set for each of the early Beatles albums up to and including Rubber Soul.
I also really wish their was a proper vinyl box set for The White Album. I didn’t have interest in getting the current vinyl box set just to get acoustic demos. I didn’t bother with the CD box set because I want Vinyl, but some of those studio tales are really amazing and I wish they were pressed to vinyl.
And perhaps maybe even a Sgt. Pepper’s vinyl box set, since they only issed a 2LP(with only 1 LP worth of outtakes).
The Beatles anthology albums need to be remixed and remastered. The new song can then be added to Anthology 3 as track 1. These albums are holy grail Beatles material and truly deserve the Giles Martin treatment using AI technology
It’s nice that they truly digitally remix these. However, do not forget the 45s we bought in the 60s, the mono mixes. Those were the hits! Do not just made slick expensive packages for EMI to make more money off the Beatles!
One day we’ll want or I will want, the original mono mixes as they were! Those played on Hifi equipment and AM radio? That IS the Beatles!!! The covers! The news of that era! And whatever tv shows they played on….! The trailers for the movies! Articles in the newspapers about them and their travels, their tours! That’s Beatlemaina! And the first 1964, Beatles items! The ads in the record stores for their current album! All that, that’s the Beatles!
No one today understands Beatlemaina. You had to be there! I can tell you!
They did include those analogue mono represses with revolver so I think that's a step in the right direction for what you want
Great ❤
❤❤❤❤
I'm a bit disappointed that we aren't getting rubber soul but there had to be some difficulties during remixing that they delayed it.
I really don't think that it's down to mixing difficulties and its more the fact they had this last minute idea to do the red and blue albums but I guess we will never really know
@@clynaack anything is possible really. I’m just hoping that they will include some rare unreleased tracks like carnival of light that aren’t related to any particular album.
They should have add more songs when cds came. Esp Red is so short
I have purchased the remixed records. While it is nice to hear better stereo mixes etc. What it gets down to for me is the music...and that can not be improved on. I get as much enjoyment from my original vinyl as I do the 1986 cds and the new versions.
I agree it's just nice to change it up a little every now and then (pun intended)
I don't need to buy the red and blue again at all, but who's kidding who? I would buy them.
Lol I'm pretty much the same but more songs and new mixes sounds good
I can see, in another 30 or 40 years, The Beatles' catalog will be on something like remix version 13.0 or 14.0. What will be interesting at that point (I won't be alive to see it) will be to hunt down the original 60s (ver. 1.0) mixes and compare them to the 2063 "current" mix. Will they be so completely changed as to be unrecognizable? Personally, I've always been four-square against any remixes, except in rare cases to fix an obvious original mix error. But, I've been overwhelmingly outvoted in this by the remaining Beatles themselves, their labels and publishers -- not to mention the general public, who are probably into remixes by a 90/10 vote. It's as if the art that was The Beatles multi-track masters are the world's to play around with, not something sacred and special. It's almost that we're saying to The Beatles and to George Martin that what they gave us, '62 to '70, wasn't good enough the first time and can be improved upon. Oh well. Vox populi.
Well if you don't like the new mixes there's nothing stopping you from going back and listening to whatever mix you enjoy the most and I think people often forget that
Ive got a bone to pick about Mr. Martin's re-mix of "Day In The Life " If you have ever heard the original version, there is a break between John's part before Paul comes in with a Whole Different song, entirely!!!! Now, on the original verson in this break,before Paul comes in, there is an "ALARM CLOCK " ringing. Now, on the 2017 verson, the Alarm Clock is GONE!!!! Why????? How in the Blue Perfect Hell did he Not Know It was Missing!!!!???? Jeez!!! Put It Back, Please!!!!!!!
Your wrong it is in Giles Martins mix
😂😂😂
Some of the songs on sgt pepper have been renamed to "2017 mix" instead of the original "remix" on spotify. I believe those are the ones set to appear on the red and blue albums
all the new mixes are labelled as such and are even separated to a different album its always been like that
My bet is on the rock song Best off that is called Rock'N'Roll album which was a hit in back in the early 80.s or so. All remastered as usual.
I'm not sure about random comps like that since it would just be more repeats
"Rubber Soul" is The Elephant In The Room......
Indeed it is...
I don't think we're going to see it this year, i think it's been pushed back to 2024
Yeah that looks likely
The post-Beatles Beatles brought us some of the most hideous mullets of all time.
Lol
I already own those albums - who cares about a re-release? I had them on vinyl, cassette, and CD. I now have them in MP3, and Spotify. 😎
its for people who don't have it, like collecting things and for those who want the new mixes
Let the Beatles rest in peace. Enough already. It’s like in the Star Trek movie where young Spock meets old Spock. Creepy.
Rest in peace??? Hahaha I don't think the Beatles will ever die
I'm tired of all the press saying that the original stereo mixes weren't "proper" stereo mixes. Though I think the separation of sounds from a mono source is a fantastic advancement and provides new possibilities for new stereo remixes, after reviewing several of the new mixes, I prefer the original mixes a lot of the time. IMHO, The BEST thing that can be done is release the separated tracks and let fans have fun and mix for themselves. You know people are doing it anyway; why not sell them the source material legitimately?
They weren't proper stereo mixes... if you call a unsupervised whacking of random instruments completely to the left or right proper then just keep listening to those versions I guess
What about Magical Mystery Tour???
Wdym
@@clynaack that should be the next release imo.
I hope it is!!! A full video about what should be included is coming soon!!
Anthology 1 next year with miles better sound...
that is an interesting thought
Can't wait to hear better versions of all Réunion songs......
I want to get a copy of now and then of course but ive already got the two lps on vinyl..i wont buy them unless the feature tracks i dont have
I want the rare stereo outtake of George Martin farting in the control booth during take 17 of “Run For Your Life”, just prior to shitting himself due to John’s lyrics.
I’m hoping AI technology can isolate and enhance this treasure and really bring out the bass tones - perhaps adding some possible phasing so we can hear the fart in 360 stereo sound? There are so many possibilities for us fans!!
Cant tell if this is a joke or not... Either way its a bit strange....
Forget Red and Blue. What I know for fact is that using newly found tapes Please Please Me single will be rereleased in surround 64-channels ATMOS. Stay tuned!
Interesting 🤔
As long as they don't change the guitar solo on Let it Be. It's my favorite version and I can't listen to the other one.
What? Who said anything about changing the guitar solo on let it be lol it was recorded decades ago George isn't exactly going to rise from the grave and re record it lol
Personally, and this is just my opinion, the music was great the way it was originally made. I don’t need the music that affected me when I was young to be run through A.I. programs, pitch correct, or auto-tune, or having parts added that were never there in the final release. I speak only for meself when I say this. What made the classics so dearly important was that they were made by human beings and the imperfections inherent in their designs only endeared them more and more. But I also get that this is part of the “consumerist” game as well. What we truly need in the world of popular music....is something new. And, I will always love the Beatles music.
What are you on about a Beatles remix or remaster has never had "pitch correct, or auto-tune, or having parts added that were never there in the final release". The whole point of the de-mix ai is pretty much to separate the old masters that were limited and recorded on two or four track recorders so they can now be given the proper stereo mix treatment.
@@clynaack ……Bloody oath....They aren’t re-releasing this stuff with simply George’s bloody sneeze included. I’m sure big bucks and and big bucks tech will be employed in all areas. It will have all the trimmings surely.
@@clynaack That's certainly not the case with Now and Then. You talked about them changing the pitch on the original harmonies recorded for Because to suit the "new" song. And this opens the gates for completely new "Beatles songs" to be created in the future. They can always say they just used the original recordings!
That's not what is meant by "pitch correct" pitch correct is where you take a vocal and shift each part of it putting it into a completely different key that wouldn't of matched up with it if the part as a whole was shifted. Its pretty much like a manual autotune. Pitch shifting is like the more basic version of that its like when you speed up or slow down a tape its pitch shifts. Like what they did on Rain where the drums and Bass was played at a faster speed so it could be slowed therefore shifting the pitch. Idk I feel they are quite different and its important to note that.
@@clynaack ……Ok, sorry for the extreme lateness, but, here it goes. Auto - Tune is a program used during a performance and Pitch Correct is used in POST production. Nuff said. Both of those programs are digital applications with the same end-game: changing what “is” into what it “isn’t” (*bloody never was). My post was not about one or the other, it was the fact that anyone chooses either at all trying to pass that off as a “true performance” (and you can throw in using pre-recorded tracks live to hide weak vocal and/or instrumental versions [*see classic Top of the Pops performances by Nirvana and New Order choosing to “mainly,” not completely, perform live - with Kurt Cobain taking the piss out of his performance live). Personally, and again this is just my opinion, any “performers” relying on those in order to make art are not fully performing.
They need to use the remastered multitrack tape. Artificial intelligence can't remix something that's already been mixed. When you use AI to deconstruct a final mix, you don't get the same tracks that are on the original master.
the problem is though the original master tapes are often (at least early on) 2-4 tracks and their is a lot more than 2-4 things going on at once. I dont get why people are seriously hating on this ai when all its doing is providing a way to split it all into its individual instruments for the first time... it either shows the lack of proactiveness (I think this is mainly in older Beatles fans) or the fact that people hear AI and dont do any research whatsoever and just assume its bad.
How much re-re-ing can any music stand before it loses meaningful connection to the original artists?
hey if you dont like it there is nothing stopping you from going back to the original mix or whatever mix you like
@@clynaack Who said I didn't like it?
The point I was trying to make was: when does a piece of music stop being a composition by the original artist, and start being a collaboration with the "re-interpreter"?
When does it stop being what the original artist intended it to be?
Nice video, but....
"lack of singles"?
So many people keep suggesting the expanded red and blue albums will now have space for singles which weren't on the original versions........
......and they are most certainly referring to "A" sides.
What singles were missed on those compilations?
Since everything is forever based on the "thou shalt not scrutinize the UK releases", all the "as they intended" "A" sides were included. The "double A sides" are there too. Even the dreaded "how dare they release that as a 45" unique US #1's as well.
Lots of the early singles where missing and there are quite a few here and there also lack the b sides is very prominent
@@clynaack Which early singles are you referring to? Things like "My Bonnie"? That has zero place on these sets.
"Quite a few here and there"......
Where?
Every major UK "A" side is included on the albums. There's also the unique US #1 hits as well.
"B" sides, yes. That's all what's lacking 45 wise.
The Beatles 1 isn't enough for me. I have to have more which is the red and blue albums
How come are the remasterings got too old? And the 2009?? Do I have to send it back to Abbey Road??
The 2009's are just remasters of the original mixes but the new ones are remixes completely different lol
Revolver remix was a sonic AI mess. The songs had balanced stereo, but there was also some distortion . Bummer.
that is just plain wrong... if you think that you might want to get your ears checked...
Please Rubber Soul. In an age of streaming Red & Blue are just redundant
You could also say that about rubber soul lol
@@clynaack how so? That’s an original album. Hits collections were good when we had to buy physical media but now we can listen to anything anytime just stick to original releases. Not against remixing just hits collections.
yeah but what's the point of remastering rubber soul when you can just "listen to anything anytime"... I tell you why! the exact reason they want to remaster the red and blue albums and thats for for a new mix. If you think about it is a really good way of doing things as its just going to give us a look into the future of how the new mixes will sound. You shouldnt be against it because all its really doing is providing even more Beatles content even if we now have to wait a little longer for the next one but hey we wouldnt be beatles fans if we didnt have patience amirite. At the end of the day if you dont like it then dont buy it because like you said you can just listen to it on a streaming service.
@@clynaack you’ve won me over, go red and blue
So every beatle used Billy Preston's services on their solo albums, then? 🤔
Aside from Paul I believe
I'd much rather see Rubber Soul.
I'm quite torn between the two but I was really excited for rubber soul so it's a shame that we have to wait longer for it
Reremasters 😂🎉
MONO only. if you've not heard the mono versions, please please me. hahaha. Capitol gets NO more of my money!!!!! none more!!!!
What?
@@clynaackthey're a mono simp. only saying they listen to the catalog in mono.
I would rather the rock n roll albums. I never liked the red and blue. I might give them a re listen and see if I change my mind.
What do you mean by that? The red and blue albums are compilation albums so a good amount of the songs are from those "rock n roll albums"
It seems to me there is this hidden wish among those wanting all these remixes etc...
The Beatles are no more ,have everyone come to terms with that. Or is it the passing of your own years that is hard to deal with.
I love The Beatles have hundreds of hours of recording sessions etc...
But continuing to purchase the same songs over and over again seems mad.
I like most people purchasing these records can remember The Beatles being a band and the musical act parents hated and feared their influence on all the kids. They were considered the bad influence of the time.
As for The Beatles I say Live and Let Die .Because, All Things Must Pass.
For me these remixes are great because I'm a new generation Beatles fan and don't have many original pressings. So to get a nice newly mixed version with loads of extra material and for not much more than an original press is pretty nice
You can be a purist all you want, but the Beatles used to mess with ALL the vocals and ALL the instruments back in the day. They are now breaking ground on AI. It shouldn't be shocking to anyone who loves the Beatles. They should de-age Paul's vocals if he put new ones on the new song.
I disagree I think Paul de-aging his vocals is a step too far. At that point just sing it in his current voice even if he's getting a little old because de-aging won't exactly make his singing any better unless they end up doing more to it like pitch correction and autotune and I really think that is going well overboard . If he's going to sing new vocals it should just be plain and simple because if anything it makes it more human and more meaningful. (I'm assuming that you know how the whole AI de-aging vocals process works)
I've heard some cool de-aged Paulie stuff so if they needed to get a back up right, I'm all for it. Are you for using the harmonies on "Because"?. That's "cheating", too, because it's not 1969. If they've come this far with it to have an unreleased John song with all of them on it, then do whatever it takes.
@@clynaack
I don't think that using harmonys from because is cheating whatsoever since it is all real vocals de-aging pretty much takes a vocals that Paul has recorded now and makes a whole new one using the old as information for the tone pitch and melody. Completely different thing if you ask me
I think it is whatever it is to Beatles fans. The Beatles did so many songs where their voices were slowed down, sped up, run through a speaker, etc. that you can BET they would've utilized AI if it was around in the 60's and 70's
@@clynaack
@@AUSTINLAFAYETTE But they didn't and that's the point. If it was the four of them making the decisions, it'd be fine.
AI This is sad. We have lost all integrity.
I really dont get it how has any integrity been lost... you know full well that if stuff like this was around in the beatles prime they would of been first to mess with it
I dislike the subtitles that you can't turn off. Distracting...
Just don't look at them...
Hopefully none. I have been buying their singles and albums since "She Loves You" came out in the US in 1963 (I was 13 so just at the right age to gah gah over the Fab Four--as they would soon be known) and my devotion has n ot wavered in the years since. I was in the fan club, had the posters, bought EVERY record, 8-Trach, Cassette, CD and... now mp3s.
It's time that whoever is in charge of all this started giving us aging fans some free upgrades.
We could have ended World Hunger with the money kids in the US ALONE spent on all this let alone the worldwide revenues they have raked in.(And that doesn't even include the "Cancel Culture Kids of 1966" who destroyed all their Beatles Memorabilia because Joh once quipped that The Beatle were more popular than Jesus" and then had to buy all that stuff again at twice the price after they came to their senses.
He nevr said they were more important. He said more popular, which given all the non-Christians both in the US and around the world they probably were.
What...
@@clynaack Don't sweat it, youngling.
Please Please Me
Why do people even care about the red and blue albums when the original albums and singles are readily available and as the band originally intended? Cash grab for all involved, that’s the answer.
All the answers are in the video if you don't understand then 🤷♂️
@@clynaack I watched it. Well done video, informative. Still, I find the interest in a “greatest hits” at this stage puzzling.
It makes sense because not only does it give a place to release Now and Then but a nice look at what all the future mixes would sound like. I think its also good to have as a way to introduce new Beatles fans that will inevitably come from Now and Then to the Beatles
dear fabs (the greatest band in the world, ever, always), please stop.
What?
Oh gosh, no, the remixed versions are sooooo good. Give us more!
Just buy the old records and you dont have to worry about what future nonsense was done to them
I happen to like the "future nonsense" thank you very much
@@clynaack , so , you like degenerate garbage , you're correct, that's your choice
What? How is it "degenerate garbage"? It's still the same songs but with in my opinion improved stereo mixing... I think its wild to be so mean over something so opinionated. What ever happened to what the Beatles taught us about peace and love.
Now and Then is such a crap song. Sad way to go out.
It's all a matter of opinion and I think now and then is an absolutely lovely song and a perfect way to end the Beatles
@@clynaack It's a dirge and not at all a 'Beatle' song. The only song that compares to it in their catalog would be 'Free As A Bird,' another dirge.
k
@@jeffthevideoguy23 Feel better now??
As someone who must be one of the first second-generation Beatlefans ever, I've been listening to The Beatles and their solo work since the 1970s. And it is my opinion that "Now And Then" is one of the best ballads that John Lennon has ever written. Maybe you should wait until you hear the finished version before you pass such judgment about it being crap. Really, all you've heard of it up till now are demos, covers, and mashups.
Nothing new here. Your just spewing what we already know. Nice try
That was the point of the video! Well done!!
A long speech with lots of irrelevant and old news.
Lovely thank you 👍
Worst band ever if you need AI to recreate their music!
What? Did you not watch the video or something because ai isn't recreating anything the AI is used just to isolate instruments and vocals
With streaming services, these albums have no purpose. This will never happen. At least I hope it doesn’t, complete waste of time and better Beatle things to spend the effort on.
In my opinion these still have loads of value over a streaming service such as sound quality and the fact that they are physical and can be a real object in your collection
Alot of repetition in this video
Only bits that I repeated where ones that I wanted to make clear
Blue = James Paul. Red = Billy Shears. Come on now.
Haha funny joke
Giles should find something else untill is very late ... won't happen. His father invented , they killing it.
🙄
Never liked compilations . Especially not by THEM. Listening parts from White album , Pepper , Abbey Road , Please Please me etc like that? Yes , if you're begginer with them . New track , great , but other is just golddigger stuff . Don't really care about delaying Rubber Soul , until they keep releasing albums like that , someone might be gone . Big NO to $300 per double Red or Blue vinyl. Beside the mish mash compilations , colored vinyl is worst . Good luck
ok
Paul gets older....new solo album never . Ringo is senile as i saw at Mary McCartney documentary on Abbey Road studio . He didn't remember nothing and he's shaky and senile as Brian Wilson. 83 years old ? Time to retire , or pushing 150 , Richard ?
If you were a figure as historical and as influential as Paul or Ringo you wouldn't want to stop because you enjoy making people happy. I really don't get the purpose of saying shit like this about them because at the end of the day they are doing what they enjoy and no one can stop them or change their minds. It seams like your just a miserable old man trying to make people feel the same way as you... if you ask me you sound like your just a jealous guy. So please for the sake of being a decent human being just be nice for once in your life.... Its really not that hard and you will be rewarded.