Where does the Political Right & Left come from?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 янв 2023
- Please join the David Starkey Members' Club via Patreon / davidstarkeytalks or Subscribestar www.subscribestar.com/david-s... and submit questions for members Q & A videos. Also visit www.davidstarkey.com to make a donation and visit the channel store shop.davidstarkey.com. Thank you for watching.
Please do not re-upload any David Starkey Talks video without permission.
#Davidstarkey #Davidstarkeytalks #History
Please join the David Starkey Members' Club via Patreon www.patreon.com/davidstarkeytalks or Subscribestar www.subscribestar.com/david-starkey-talks and submit questions for members Q & A videos. Also visit www.davidstarkey.com to make a donation and visit the channel store shop.davidstarkey.com. Thank you for watching.
I think that Dr Starkey is the teacher we all wish we had, and can now be so thankful that we have access to. He has such a clear, entertaining, and logical way of presenting things.
Thank you Mr Starkey, a much appreciated 21 minutes of calm sanity amongst all this madness.
I am realising more and more that the madness is in fact limited to a vanishingly small minority. What really has to be stamped out is sane people perpetuating insane lies in a misguided strategy for self-preservation. Thankfully, we seems to be making steady headway on that issue as well.
The Westminster seating plan, with the government being on the right of the Speaker, applies in the Canadian Parliament and every provincial legislature EXCEPT Prince Edward Island. In PEI the government is on the left of the Speaker. My PoliSci prof. told us that this came about because the door to the Member's lounge is on the left and the government wants to make sure that they can get to the bar before those scoundrels in the opposition.
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me
😂
I have often thought that instead of referring to "right" and "left" we should be more truthful and refer to them as "right" and "wrong"
Haha
Thank you Dr Starkey so nice to listen to your wisdom.
“This applies to continental legislatures”.
Somehow reminds me of the story - possibly apocryphal - of a sign at Victoria Station reading “Platform 19 for the Continent”. A wag added beneath the words, “All other platforms for the Incontinent”.
Thank you, David, for yet another fascinating talk.
I am always encouraged to read more after listening to your discourse.
David Starkey I just love you!
" Men are rarely to govern themselves. " Republics are transient at best; they are the first at best; they are the first form of society, arising from the unions of families, the American Indians lived in tribal Republics and Africa is full of such democracies. But the differential of economic status puts an end to these egalitarian governments, and differentiation is the inevitable accompaniment of development. "Which is better, " he asks, a monarchy or a Republic?"-- and he replies: "For four thousand years this question has been tossed about. Ask the rich for the answer-- they want an aristocracy. Ask the people they want democracy. Only the monarchs want a monarchy. How come then it has become that almost the entire earth is governed by monarchs? Ask the rats who propose to hang a bell around the neck of a cat." But when a correspondent argues that monarchy is the best form of government he answered "Provided that Marcos Aurelius is the, what monarch; for otherwise what difference would it make to a poor man whether he is devoured by a lion or by a hundred rats?" Voltaire
Thank you, Professor Starkey I am always glad to listen to your lectures. With the deepest appreciation and admiration for your contributions to education. ❤️
Love doctor starkey
Cannot wait! 💓
Thank you Dr David Starkey for your fascinating lectures. I have now learned a great deal more about history of our land. I wish I could contribute but not able to because of the huge inflation of bills to stay warm. It feels that we're re living the 1950's !
Always good to learn something new from you. Thank-you. What a great teacher you are.
Glad to see Starkey working to further develop his very interesting thoughts on conservatism articulated earlier this year in Hungary
More to the point, why are they now all the same, pigs in the same trough?
Fascinating, Sir. Welcome back.
Good to see you back. Of course, I have followed you on other channels.
I wonder that more people do not know the story about right and left in the French assembly. I thought it was well known.
As for the attitude about the Continent, I recall an interesting conversation from when I lived in England in the early part of this millennium. I was talking to some friends, whose children went to school with mine. They were talking about their upcoming holiday in Italy. They made some disparaging remarks about "those Continentals". I remember similar comments being made when I first went to England, in 1974. I had just come from "the Continent". It was all very illustrative of the attitudes of the times.
The political terms Right and Left deriving from the French assembly is well known, that is not his point. His point is that this division is a "Contintental" import, and that it was not until the 1930's, and in particular during the Spanish Civil War, that people in the Anglosphere (New Statesman readers et al who supported the Russian Revolution) began to describe themselves as on the Left, with everybody else being on the Right. The Left on the Continent were those who supported the French Revolution. The attitudes of those dim and distant years of a decade ago persist in England for the simple reason that Continental politics is different, that is precisely the point he is making.
Love you David. I only came across you 10yrs ago on Question Time and Ive always looked out for you since.
This is an excellent channel, thank you.
Yes, this history is obviously correct, but long before the French revolution, during the English civil wars, for example, there were opposed parties, those who suported the king and monarchical principles, and radical Levellers and advocates of social equality, of whom Wynstanley is the obvious example. In other words the division existed long before 1789. I wonder what terms contemporaries used for these opposing parties. Thank you, Dr S, for your great knowledge and for sharing it with us all. I could listen to you for hours. History is definitely the most interesting subject there is.
Time literally stops when listening to Starkey. Evidence of this is in the clock on his fireplace behind him. It doesn't move!
Always interesting
Many thanks for the insight Dr Starkey
This was brilliant
Excellent
Awesome. Excellent channel. Well said. Spot on. Support STV voting system for UK general election politically in England Britain London. French Revolution. Napoleon thet another story he created modern Italy Thomas. Napoleonic law.
As always, very welcome.
I wonder what your take is on British Communism?
You should write a book on English Conservatism. Your lectures are worth a book on the subject.
As Britain came late to the party, we should be the ones to coin new terms. Perhaps "The Sinister" and "The Correct".
I think it represents the different personality types. Some are more left, some are naturally more to the right. Parliament over time has automatically organised itself into the two opposing sides to represent these different view points.
Read ‘A Conflict of Visions’ by Thomas Sowell
Sowell is criminally underappreciated
Hi David,
Great video, really enjoyed it. Could you do a video on communism/marxism and Karl Marx as I think people don't realise/forget how evil communism was/is and the millions that were killed because of it.
Big thank you for making the video.
Cheers,
Billy
I'm currently living in Eastern Europe - Bucharest and before that Slovenia. They still haven't recovered from communism - at all. People are still super depressed. Life is drab despite the obvious improvements - they are psychologically still suffering.
I'm going to leave soon lol
@@joblakelisbon Good luck leaving.😂
Excellent account, thank you. The Spanish Civil War itself perhaps amid echoes from Russia and its royal family, polarising the opposite sides.
This is not David Starkeys best podcast. Its too laboured and heavy. I feel Davids strength is when he is debating and when he in on a panel. I dont think he is too comfortable talking into a camera on an singular level. Clearly, an erudite and learned man but this podcast was hard work in my opinion.
Is your clock working now?
You'd want a sectioning if you bought one of those Dave Starkey T-shirts
17:18 probably not their "veganism". The word vegan being coined in 1944, while The Road to Wigan Pier was first published 1937.
But that's all I know about it, just those dates, I haven't read the book so I may be wrong. Maybe Orwell attacked the concept, without using the word which didn't exist yet.
So the idea that the political left and right horseshoe back around was historically literally true haha
Left is revolutionary and the left is conservative,may be so,in the house of Commons left is radical party whilst the right is having age old ideas,might be French revolution in France came out by the left,either left or center left the former is having more radical theories,mostly left is the development of poor or deprived class
Тему разговора держит тоже неплохо
Seating plan? Has David Starkey been really been cramming to remember his Debrett's correct form?
Whence cometh L&R, from simplistic thinking.
Not sure if I’m convinced that “left” and “right” are new …. In concept at least. Can we see shades of it in the Levelers and diggers? In the Optimes and populares?
Aren’t all modern “conservatives” simply a flavor of Liberal?
Universalism, universal value or imposing by anyway the occidental culture, destroying all what it doesn't suit it.
🇨🇦❤️
It actually comes down to first principles, it's universal. The left is about competition and winning, gauche and sinister, power grabbing (power grabbing is inherently sinister). The right is about righteousness, patronising and hypocritical. The right keep the left at bay by appealing to the people, who in return lift them up above the competition. The lady and right may both talk about morality, but only the right can be hypocritical, because only THEY believe in what they're saying. The left just want to win, they have lower standards, they only care about strength, competence. The centre is about correctness, impish and logical. You can't be correct without a sense of righteousness, and you can't do right without the competence of a winner (or a gangster). Put another way: The best way to win is to be righteous (or you have to worry about payback), and the best way to be righteous is to be correct (or you end up being hypocritical, spoiling and patronising people, you have to 'cruel to be kind', forgiveness and redemption, recognise that 'no man is good', that sort of thing).
Very appropriate you chose the word "gauche" as it means "left" in French.
@@hunkyhaggis2161 I know, that's why I said it!
That is all a muddle. The left aren't righteous or hypocritical? The left don't appeal to the people for legitimacy over the right?
@@Lytton333 it's not a muddle. It's a simple oscillation. Left, right, centre. You need strength, before righteousness, before knowing the correct non hypocritical way to be righteous. People are inherently selfish. It only sounds muddled because it clashes with what you've been told before
@Paul Hitchens exactly
What’s the intro music?
Beethoven symphony no. 9, 2nd movement.
Правые за свободу предпринимательства, национальное единство в противовес прагам , а враги у них кто лезет на их рынки, а левые про человеческие отношения с минииальным притяханием в том числе и к качеству многих второстепенных аспектов
They divide over the question whether capitalism is evil, as Adam Smith apologetically confirms with the lame excuse of necessity.
Как насчет версии, что Королева была потомком Мухаммеда
The idea that a political philosophy that strives to replace liberal democracy is able to be located within a liberal democratic parliament has always struck me as very erroneous.
Fascism, National Socialism, and Marxism are all interpretations of the Young Hegelian's political assertion that society will evolve or progress to shed itself of liberal notions of the sovereignty and primacy of the people.
Such "progress-ive" philosophies maintain that representative democracy itself is an invalid notion.
So left and right do not apply to non liberal parties or faiths that are unable to enter into debate as a means of developing ideas and arriving at a more reasoned resolution of what is the best course of action.
Left and right wings by definition cannot have a bar of ideas that do not look to open democracy, debate and compromise.
It's almost like Starkey is a parody of an English intellectual.
The French ….
Are to voting Tory no Thomas. They UK general election December 2024. You need ask Art Bezukavenko for Tories to lose they doing job themselves politically in England Britain London politically Thomas. Appreciate your work.
Did talk Enoch Burke Anglo Irish yes told he did get English language correct so Irish education university caught him out politically. If get his English language correct still Be in job as Irish teacher ways around it Thomas in Ireland. He wealthy Enoch Burke Thomas.
If Starkey had emotional maturity higher than infant level, he wouldn't be outcast as a pariah as he is now.
What say Artiomboy Italian nurse I am happy not bother about you Art Bezukavenko that hurt him Thomas
Art Bezukavenko did damn Thomas yes what education David Starkey it high Thomas. Is he smart yes Thomas. Italy hate Art Bezukavenko they told you truth Thomas.
Left = equality
Right = Inequality
Would Italy give Art Bezukavenko Italian passport no Thomas. Italian government politically told you truth Thomas. Tory government in England Britain you want gone Thomas.
Watch DS with the sound OFF, see his facial contortions, which reveal personality and character. Tortured, resentful, vindictive.
If only he'd stuck to history, instead of pushing reactionary politics, being cantankerous and gratuitously insulting others, he wouldn't have been marginalised by the MSM. He self-destructed. Like in a Greek tragedy.
But here you are, watching his channel.. lol