Just How Big is America's C-17 Globemaster III
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2020
- The C-17 Globemaster serves as the U.S. Air Force’s primary strategic lift aircraft for global transport of troops and equipment. The C-17 is capable of rapid strategic delivery of troops and all types of cargo to main operating bases or directly to forward bases in the deployment area. The aircraft can perform tactical airlift and airdrop missions and can transport litters and ambulatory patients during aeromedical evacuations when required. The inherent flexibility and performance of the C-17 force improve the ability of the total airlift system to fulfill the worldwide air mobility requirements of the United States.
Other videos you might like:
This is America's E-6 Mercury ► • It Could Nuke a Countr...
Why America's Enemies Feared the P-47 ► • Thunderbolts: Why Amer...
America's Crazy Flying Aircraft Carrier ► • Meet America's Flying ...
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO US ► ruclips.net/user/USMilitaryN...
Thank You 
Наука
Man, she is sweet. Look at the capacity! She's a beast. Amazing.
Not gonna lie....I never noticed how huge the tail was until this video!
hi M P...
'
who is a word - SHE -...
what she look alike and where she live in
@@bestamerica You need to read a book or research. "A ship is always referred to as 'she' because it costs so much to keep one in paint and powder." - Chester Nimitz CIC SoComPac. WWII
@@mapoijitur1161
hi M P...
'
dont use a word - YOU - on me...
let explain about this vehicle...
'' SHE '' is a NOT of any vehicles as airplanes / boats / ships / any vehicles at all...
'' SHE '' is a only female as aunt / daughter / girl / her / huwoman / lady / mother / sister / wife / woman...
not vehicle...
remember that any females are SHE and not vehicles
@@bestamerica Get a life bub.
I've jumped out of many of these. I even got to ride in the cockpit on the way into Afghanistan. They seem huge until you see the C-5
Roger that. C5M Super galaxy is way bigger Only to be outdone by the Antonov 225.
Jump the Jet ! ... used to be C-141 Starlifter... nowadays C-17 Globemaster 😉
C5s dwarfs C17s. Those things are massive
@@lorenzomaximo1818 this didn't age well...
Cap
My old man worked at McDonnell Douglas's Long Beach, CA Plant when the C-17 took it’s first flight. Interestingly, his father-in-law, my grandfather, worked there at the same time! So the Globemaster III has a special place in my heart🙂
Cool
I’ve been inside a C17 at a local airshow. Inside the cargo area is a huge space that could accommodate a huge range of cargo. The rear ramp means many types of vehicles can be driven in. More impressive is it’s short take off and landing capability. To see the C17 do short field landing is awesome.
Blown flaps... no "squash effect"
Cap
Back in 1997 the Air Force had static air shows throughout the country, celebrating their 50th birthday. I went to the one at Standiford Field in Louisville, KY. I believe that was one of the greatest experiences that I've ever had. They had the C-17, the C-5 and they had the C-130 in every configuration that you could imagine. It was great.
I worked on the c17 back in 1991 for Douglas aircraft in long beach and my brother was a quality engineer in quatzite..Arizona the same time. Proud of what we did
Worked there also from 1986 to 2003 as one of the Flight Dispatcher. Dispached several of these in test and production besides the other aircraft MDC produced. Miss those days.
I work on these planes, their versatility and capability is outstanding, love them!
Beautiful gorgeous beast, impressive takeoff American ingenuity bless the crew
As a airborne infantry vet, I loved the C-17. It was like a Cadillac to jump. I’ll always have love for the C-130, but the 17 is super smooth and everyone gets their own seat, as opposed to being piled on top of each other on a cargo net bench lol. We flew C-17s from Alaska to Australia non stop, did an in flight rig, then jumped into Australia on a training mission. A C-17 also carried me on a litter to Germany from Iraq when I was wounded in action. Between the C-5, C-17, and C-130 we have a great fleet of fixed wing cargo/utility aircraft.
I really hope someone models this for MSFS. I absolutely love this beast. Edit (2:35) : The C130 wingspan is a little bigger that 38 feet, lol.
Yeah, by just under 100'......132'.
Its the height that is 38'.
The c17 is in msfs it’s just a wip
I had the joy of sitting in the Captain's seat in a C17 when it last visited the Ysterplaat Airforce Base in South Africa, in 2008. It was fantastic. Thank you USAF. I now fly my own Globemaster in fsx. Blessings to all the guys that fly in this beautiful plane. Happy landings. John
These planes are so big they look like they are standing still when the fly over my home in Myrtle Beach on their way home to Charleston. I love these big girls 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
I've seen a few in Texas near SeaWorld and fighter jets, what kind I don't know but they are LOUD even while being soooo high up.
"How big is the C-17 Globemaster III?"
*Laughs in C-5 Galaxy*
Laughs in not broken
Is it bigger?
@@ImGoingSupersonic wayyyy bigger
the people who built the an225
amatures
@@nurbnord7451 If we're keeping it real.. 223 C-17s is way more impressive then 1 AN-225.. not to mention we built like 130+ C-5 Galaxys... just saying
Pilot: Thank you for flying Globemaster, please remember to pull your ripcord upon exiting the vehicle..
lol
Lol
Lol
Lol
Lmao
Helped build sections for these at the Pueblo Colorado plant back in 94-95. Even got to ride in one when the Air Force gave appreciation rides to the workers
Amazing aircraft, was at Charleston AFB in '93 for the Thunderbirds airshow when they showed her off for the first time. Everyone was gasping! Left 100 feet off the C-130 wingspan btw.
My Airman son is a maintainer for these awesome planes.He loves any chance to go on a TDY
Superb 👍
Thank you for your family’s service. I hope your son remains safe. 🇺🇸
your son is awesome serving those big birds.
@@robertryan1881 Thank you !! He just received Airman of The Year award ,so so proud
Just before McDD (original contractor) was bought by Boeing, right after they released this plane, I built two sets of 17 racks of test gear to simulate opens and shorts to test 17 of the 51 on board computers in these things. They had "peg boards" that allowed the testers to simulate any open or shorts in the cabling and demonstrate proper redundant system turnover and activation. It was a pretty cool job and we had two of the head-up units with us to make sure the slide trays on those two racks worked correctly. Lots and lots of inter-rack cable sets. It was a fun job and I am proud that I was a part of it. That was at a place called AP Labs in San Diego. I went on to work at ViaSat and made multiple sets of racks that were called "Stimulators" which were used down at the big Hughes anechoic chamber in Texas to test the F-22 and F-35 and B-1, etc. Hundreds of channels synched up to nanoseconds of each other. That was like 9 racks each and I built three sets of them.
NOTE: A C-130 is NOT 97’ long with a wingspan of 38’10”. Wrong, that is the HEIGHT. The wingspan is over 132’.
I was about to say that lol.
Was looking for this comment. ^^
Yea..that sort of Stood Out Immediately
The amazing thing is that the copy writer, the announcer, the CGI guy, the director, the editor, NONE OF THEM caught this glaring error. Wow.
@@daveboyers4549 None of them know this info instinctively, so how could they? This was written in the script incorrectly.
I went side the cargo bay of the C17 while attending an air show. My biggest impression was “it was much smaller than I expected” especially compared to the bigger airliners.
I live just on the other side of the fence from joint base lewis mcchords runway. So i see these buggers every day and night. They are suprisingly quite
They are quite quiet?
I live right by Joint Base Charleston and see them daily as well. You are right they are very quiet, don’t even really hear them anymore.....now when a fighter comes or goes that’s a whole different story....they are loud.
@@davidpearson3304 Turbofan vs jet engines.
Without a doubt, the best plane out there! The capabilities are endless.
Wrong quack fan! GKG!
@@dennisschreiber7663 HA! The Queens will miss the playoffs again this year as well so what then? LOL
The C-17 is the coolest of all cargo planes! It’s agile, fast, powerful and beautiful. The C-17 it’s the Corvette in the airplane world.
I think the Corvette title likely goes to the 130, as much as I do love the 17...
C-17 is the iron garbage. Simply junk.
@@glenantrim5728 I fly on em for work and can honestly say that is frankly not true, their capabilities are friggin insane.
The widows on it are the same windows from the DC-10.
I worked as a structural design engineer for MacDac on the wing design program (I designed the fittings that attach the flaps to the wing). Extremely thin wing for a plane this size, but still pretty roomy to design within compared to most other wings I’ve worked on! Very successful design overall, obviously.
I procured Landing Gear for Spares/fleet readiness. She’s an amazing ship
Was one of the Flight Dispatchers for Flight Test and Production from 1987 to 2002 Long Beach MDC for all aircraft coming out of LGB and flight test facilities.
I second that thought this plane looks awesome... I love aviation.. Great video.
Great Information, thanks
You may want to sharpen the ol’ pencil when measuring the C-130 wingspan.
38’ foot wingspan is a Tad narrow for any operational C-130.
I’ve seen a few that hit the tarmac that 38’ is a genuine measurement for overall wingspan...
We have them here 164th .. they are huge and we sit and watch the routine runs as the fly around the city
These videos help me respect our military over and over and over again
I love watching them flying low over our home doing their maneuvering to a drop zone 20 miles away. Many times there are 2 or 3 closely spaced.
So let them never crash.
Got to hang out in one back in 94 when they were doing heavy drop testing at Ft Campbell
Never got to jump from one
hi A P...
'
i was live in clarksville and went to fort campbell army base with my army daughter in 2007 to 2008
I know why youre all here in light of recent times.
Beautiful, amazing how they unload from the sky.
Fantastic work horse, so useful, here in Australia our airforce have a few, we love them!!
As an American who would love to visit Australia one day, it makes me happy to hear such..much love & peace from Boston ✌🏽
These fly over my house every once in a while
It’s pretty cool
Mine as well. They are absolutely MASSIVE in the sky.
@Bail 10k
and the earth is flat right?
@Bail 10k
actually you are right, the exhaust of those massive engines definitely poop toxic chemicals into our atmosphere. But to think they are purposefully spraying toxic chemicals on the people is just childish. They fly over because they are constantly training. However I will say again those massive engines definitely poop toxins into our atmosphere and that really sucks!
@Bail 10k
well Bail, first of all I typed spews and my jackass spellcheck put poops. I have to
turn off my spell check for sure. Next, chemicals you are referring to are called carcinogens and teratogens, if these things are trying to control the population they sure are doing a lousy job. And if that’s what they are doin we would expect to see a massive number of cancers and baby deformations, but these are both declining. And how exactly do you think they are controlling the population? This is a question asked in goodwill, and I am truly interested. If they were trying to control populations they would be flying routinely over Bangladesh, China and India, not the USA.
moreover bail, dumping carcinogens and teratogens over populations would be a horribly inefficient way of controlling populations. The deep state would poison our drinking water, not the air.
Respect for the troops for sitting 19 hours straight on those tiny seats with extremely limited legroom. How does the military prepare for the very real possibility of deep vein thrombosis under those situations?
You will never know unless you are in the know... Most the time even the ones jumping only know they are about to jump out of a perfectly flying aircraft
Might be an issue for us lazy turds watching RUclips, probably not for these in shape guys and gals. Hehe.
They have crews so they can switch every few hours. To get shut eye and to streach your legs out and they're also in top shape as well
Laying on the floor/ramp is authorized and even encouraged. Guys who are jumping never sit that long. They come from much closer in. While these planes can fly that long, they pretty much never do. Crew time-outs when it comes to flying time and our bases along the way means that it has a chance to land, refuel, crew rest, etc.
Enjoyed your video so I gave it a Thumbs Up
I'm just glad you got Seth Rogan to do the voiceover!
In all seriousness, awesome video!
wow that plane looks awesome
Cessna
Beautiful and an amazing aircraft love being
I think of comparisons: it's about the same length of a C-141 but much fatter and wider for larger cargo. It's about 2/3 the size of the C-5 which performed amazingly in Vietnam and other places.
I have seen this plane very closely and I love how huge it is
I remember my first time flying on a globe master it was freaking huge
Rode it a few times in Iraq. Tactical take offs and landings can put tears in your eyes with this thing. Lol
Lucky me I lived just down the road from the Long Beach Plant..... saw lots of these come off the line when I drove to work......... NICE PLANE.......... Nice Video, Thank You.
Huge Powerful Elephants. Amazing and great to watch. Thank you.
0:37 oh no worries, just called my jet in just cause 4.
I grew up in the Lowcountry of South Carolina and remember when these replaced the C-141s.
Still here!
I remember replacing them at McGuire. Worked on both.
Hard to believe this amazing aeroplane is almost 30 years old! Love it. Shame they don’t build them anymore.
I've seen it in the air..look like the C-17 is not moving because it's so big.
I have the C-17 RC plane.
Hi, an outstanding example of American military aviation. The BEST in the world!!!!!!
My last deployment I was supervising force protection team in Afghanistan. One day I was managing the checkpoint for aircraft traffic entering the active runway, keeping TCN (Third Country Nationals) construction crewmembers from driving vehicles where they weren't supposed to. Had a younger group of military/civilian security on site that weren't as experienced with confrontation. As I was managing the site, I had a TCN blow through our checkpoint on a tractor as a C-17 was approaching the active runway. I had to run up from the opposing checkpoint and charge my weapon in front of his to face to get him to stop. Any other military member would have taken the opportunity to shoot in the desert and get a medal but luckily for him I had enough time to think and sort out my aggression out there beforehand. He drove straight towards me but I charged up and was half a second from blowing his head off. He went back to the first checkpoint, I remember seeing the faces of the C-17 crew members as I escorted the driver back to checkpoint. Found out later the tractor driver got kicked off base 6 months earlier for running over and killing his fellow construction worker with an "earth mover" blade. If I did not realize how we control our own actions whether military or civilian and have the power to make decisions above general authority, I would have made a poorer decision that day. Killing is a final option, not the first.
Excellent story and the ending is to me, what police officers need to be taught and trained.
Beautiful bird. Wow!!!
What an amazing plane!!.... I was an aircraft electrician on left wing of the prototype (stinger) C-17 at Mc Donnell Douglas plant in Long Beach, CA in the early 90's , I was the only AcE on 2nd shift, got to work with design engineers and inspectors, rerouting electrical wire assemblies & mounting support points for both leading and trailing edge, from fuselage joint to wing tip ...more. wire than any U.S. Military cargo aircraft do to it's FBW design. Was a great experience!!!!
Worked there from 1987 to 2002 as a Flight Dispatcher Flight Test & Production.
@@keithfreitas2983 @ Long Beach Airport?? .... How cool is that!!
I was at Fort Lewis, WA, back in early 90s. That was back when it was C-130, C-141, and C-5 were the main air lift. Saw this new transport plane doing "touch and go" at the Army airfield and I didn't know what it was.
Back in my USAF days I got to go inside this aircraft and you really can't appreciate the size until your standing inside the cargo hold. It's a bad-ass!
Hello Cracker So tell me how are you doing?
I live near Joint Base Charleston, and they fly over all the time.
I am always impressed with the equipment we have and don't know why I am always surprised. We spend too much on defense when really it's offense.
Solid bird! I got a few flights on these.When I was stationed in the Sianai back in 2015,we would load 2 blackhawk helicopters inside for a trip to Germany for heavy maintence. the clearance is literately inches from the top of the rotor head to the center of the wing internally. Very Tight squeeze.
You put together a really good video, everyone should take lessons from You. Never a board moment.
"it's tiny" -C5 Loadmaster
The AN-225 loadmaster said the same about the Galaxy.
@@afcgeo882 it was built to be bigger than the C5 for bragging rights. There are only 2 and one is now used for scavenging parts to keep the other flying.
@@thomasblankinship98 Only a single AN-225 was ever made, bud, and even the AN-124 is bigger than the C-5. The other was never operational. It was never completed. The 225 was designed to carry rocket boosters and the Buran space shuttle. 55 AN-124s were built and they were never made to one-up the C-5 as it was meant to be a civilian outsized cargo carrier from the start, unlike the C-5 which was only meant to be military. Russia is now designing its own, updated, military AN-124-102.
HMM but still flying!
It not whether it's bigger or smaller. It was designed to support ground troops so it's capability is to land on gravel, dirt and short runways. To get in and out fast with equipment and supplies.
I had the privledge of a guided tour of a USAF C-17 by it's loadmaster at Farnborough Airshow.
Awesome experience, awesome aircraft.
🇺🇸 👏 🇬🇧
Simply amazing!
Beautiful plane our military rocks🙏❤
I was part of the software team at GEC-Avionics for the HUD for this big-ole-gal and can clearly remember watching the maiden flight of P1 (with her long pointy red/white stripped nose probey thing) on 15 September 1991 and have a wall poster from McDonnell Douglas as a "thank you" for getting her to that major milestone. A few weeks later, Jane's did an article of that first test flight and in it was a picture underneath which was the caption "GEC's HUD in TOGA mode showing FMA windows", the picture was a completely blank black square - so not too far from the truth at that time ;-)
I made simulator racks for those HUDs that they bought from AP Labs right before the buy out by Boeing. It had two mount slides on it and a peg board to simulate opens and shorts to ensure that the redundant systems kicked in and worked right. Other racks for 16 of the onboard systems to check proper redundant system operation as well. Two sets of each, so they even ordered the test systems in redundant fashion. :-)
@@cosmicraysshotsintothelight Are you implying my software could fail? LOL!!! 😉
@@TheOneTrueSpLiT It simulated hardware shorts and opens in the interconnect cables on 17 of the 51 onboard computers, and would be used to prove that your software actually works to enable the redundant standby systems. But hey, you may not even have written any of that. It could be 'hard wired' or in firmware. So you probably can't even tell me about it. :-P
@@cosmicraysshotsintothelight We had an "Independent Test Group" who were a mix of hardware and software engineers that had one of our HUDs connected to a test bench consisting of various Logic Analysers and bespoke gear to give the HUD simulated data in order to test all of the HUD's functionality, as well as BIT, we even had a joystick connected to the test bench so we could "fly" the HUD while giving it the data for all sorts of simulated scenarios. That's as much involvement I had with the test setups, sure I had to do unit and integration test on the modules of code but other than "flying" the HUD that's as much involvement I had with the hardware - I never really understood most of it and still don't to this day, and the same applies for networks, mobile phones and printers!
@@TheOneTrueSpLiT These were racks meant to test for interconnect cable failures and were far more simple than your "stimulation" equipment. Orders of magnitude more simple. They were simply meant to test the changeover function of how redundant hardware sets were/are supposed to operate. They had a pegboard where all the cables entered and exited and small 'shorting bars' in place to show normal connects and then to simulate a cabling short or open by (mis)placing or removing them, to see if the second unit kicked in. So we had two slide mounts on each rack made for each type of on board computer and pegboards above each as break out boxes for the cabling. Very simple stuff and no real electronic diagnostic hardware at all, IIRC. There was a master unit which was, IIR a VAX/VMS chassis with customer supplied boards and software. Probably written and supplied by yous guys. :-)
Thank you for your service
Sat in the cockpit of one of these in RAF Brize Norton when I was about 12, great memory.
It still amazing me how something as big as that can get off the ground wow
It is Called...LIFT
Sally Field, of all people, explained it best back in 1967...
“When lift plus thrust is greater than load plus drag … well, anything can fly.”
Great video! Never flew it (old C-141 guy here). I think you missed the wingspan of the C-130 at 38'10". I'd add about 100'. Cheers
@@c17nav 141. Easy Carl, 10 out of 1 people are dyslexic.
@@c17nav I fixed my typo. XX MAS at CHS.
@@c17nav Interesting. Hope you got a few C-17 rides.
@@c17nav Sounds fun.
@@gerardmoran9560 It was. Notice that I deleted my old posts, as they were spurred by your original. Cheers.
I would love to see one of these land at London city airport. It’s got the steel approach ability, the runway is long enough. It may not be wide enough, though, it would be a sight to see, though.
As a Vet of South East Asia I’ll always love the C-130, it took good care of me!!
There's one flying around with a dent in her tail. That's where my paratrooper son got blown into the tail during a very windy jump. His helmet made contact. He was scrambled a bit but walked away and jumped another day. Glad he's done with that job and gone on to an occupation that is not as hazardous and pays better.
The C17 is still one of my favorite aircraft.
I love to live near Charleston. We watch these guys daily. As said they look to be standing still above us. Such a thrill when they fly over.
May i just say my goodness the thing is gorgeous
And first
It's maneuverability is amazing
💜💜💜❤️❤️❤️💞💞💞👏👏👏👍👍👍💪💪💪🙏🙏🙏✝️✝️✝️💯💯💯🤗🤗🤗🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😻 America is #1 country in the world!! I am so proud of all our Americans military heroes who serving in the country!!! Love all of them! Thank you for all your service!!! Amen! 🙏🙏🙏💯
After 19 hours in the air, I cannot imagine the joy of the paratroopers having a relief leak on the ground.
there's a bathroom on the 17
@@1m3agle More than the aircraft's built-in lavatory is necessary at times. When the mission requires added capability, an Air Transportable Galley/Lavatory (ATGL), a Distinguished Visitor (DV) pallet, or a Command and Control (C2) Module can be rolled on. These have lavatories and increased waste storage.
Got onboard a few of these whilst visiting U Tapao Airbase in Thailand. The flight crew were excellent gentlemen that represented the USA to the fullest! Great aircraft and well educated polite crew! Well done USA!
It's really big!
Especially when walking under the glide path when they're landing! They seemed to be coming in at 20mph and 20ft above us!
How are you doing loveYup from love you too baby and I love how you doing I hoiret @Elijah Kennedy-Gibbens how are you doing this evening or something all girl you know what I find a good time to read my account number is crying and your wife ready to talk carded to get the money for me to get the money to blurb about the same size as drut the money to pay me back dlirr you in theCurt and your wife ready love you too baby I love you too baby how are you doing today my love bites of things that need to hire someone to take care of yourself for me to get the money for the weird to get the money to you about this but I'm going cool with me on the phone with my account number is going to have a sitter for me on either side nlieut the money to pay for love well I will send them Geico insurance card for me euirtu the bluey you in the morning to make sure criteria to get the money wruh you in the loop on the phone with them Geico insurance card to the airport guru and your wife ready to bleh you in the morning if you want me to suey you in the loop euop you in the loop on the phone with my account Bank details for you in the next few minutes ago I look Caitlyn is going to have a vehicle is still better today but still not received my email (+1399437224 ceurt access the link to get the money for me to you in the loop as to how to your going to have cig you in the money I look forward to hearing fit in a few minutes?
Nice video and very informative and very entertaining and very satisfaction more videos.
A very well balanced plane
And thank God the Royal Australian Air Force has 8 of them.
One flew over my house in aus
Nice. Thanks for sharing.
Thank You Chopper Johnny. That was both informational and educational. It looks like a smaller C5. Y not more c5’s??
C-5a are maintenance hogs, expensive and require long, well-paved runways. C-17s do not.
Like dad always said...
When you join the military, they say they will put you behind a gun.
In reality, they put you in front of someone else's gun.
It's worth considering.
Thanks Dad.
She is massive, we were just loading up secret service vehicles on the c-17 after trumps rally in Arizona and she’s a big girl
Awesome Plane, Thanks Sam and crew. 👍 🇺🇸
This plane is great to fly on, it is smooth flying and powerful. We used to live next to the active runway at FOB Speicher in Tikrit, Iraq and the C-17 was a regular guest. I had the privilege of watching it take off at night and that beast would rotate and accelerate at such a steep angle that it was comparable to a fighter jet taking off, and I noticed that even without Night Vision you could see the heat in the exhaust end glowing red! I flew as the only passenger once, from Hungary to Germany and I was invited up to the flight deck, I noticed that they had full-color weather radar and Nav, glass cockpit and really comfortable looking seats, NICE! We left Iraq on a C17 and as soon as we pulled off of the runway, the Threat Warning Reciever detected an anti-aircraft seeker targeting our aircraft and the pilot immediately deployed chaff and anti AA flares and he pulled it hard left and right banking maneuvers and for awhile dropped it down to the deck, of course, this was a total surprise to us because the pilot was too busy saving our lives and was unable to narrate the events in real-time! Anyhow, once we were out of danger he explained what we had just endured, and he and the rest of the crew received a great round of applause from all of us!
no chaff but yes to flares and some other stuff :)
There is no "Threat Warning Receiver" per se on the C-17. The defensive systems on the aircraft consist of the Missile Warning System, the Countermeasures Dispensing System, and the Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures system. To some degree they are integrated with each other.
@@c17nav I understand that "technically" the system is not termed a "threat warning receiver," however missiles are a "threat" and the system gives you some sort of "warning", rest assured I will never utilize the term "threat warning receiver" in regards to the C-17 ever again! I am an old Blackhawk guy and that is what the system was called. My apologies, folks for calling it a "Threat Warning Receiver", Lol!
Still half of a C5. C5 is beautiful.
It's not half the size of the c5 c17 is not way way smaller than the c5 both planes were parked near each other at an airshow I attended.The c17 is a big plane when you see it in person
The c130 is the quite small in person but still bigger than your regional airliner
@@Randomy5428 I'm aware of sizes. Ty for your input. C5 still better. Still the king. Miss the c141 the damn c17 replaced.
I've ridden all 3.. C5 is my bitch.
Out.
The wingspan of the c-130 is 132 feet 7". Its the height that is 38'.
Well, not as amazing as the C5 for carrying capacity, but can get into "little" places more easily. Still can't make C-130 operational requirements for short fields, but its a good replacement for the C141 Starlifter. Those who have driven it know it can do a hell of a job in and out when needed - so right up the middle.
The "flaps" on top of the wing, are as you described. But they are more correctly described as speed brakes, or spoilers. The actual flaps are at the trailing edge, & deploy downward. Recognizable by any pilot. In fact, when they deploy fully, they impinge the jet exhaust, redirecting it downward. They are referred to as "blown" flaps. Radically reducing landing speed, & descent rate, while increasing descent angle. Allowing clearance over obstacles at the end of the runway, & a reduced rollout. Very helpful on takeoff, for the same reason.
Big enough to carry a much needed question mark in the title?
It’s the little brother of the c-5m
Well not really.... The Original order was to replace the C-130, C-141, and C-5... But as we know it only replaced the C-141
hi T C...
'
who is a brother...
airplane is a NO blood gene family root tree
@@bestamerica ; well u did say family and u gotta admit its got balls.
@@BilgePump
hi B P...
'
dont use a letter word - U - on me...
let explain about airplane is a not brother - not sister...
what kind of balls
The C-5 is Lockheed, just like the C-130, but the C-5 is Boeing (McDonnell-Douglas), so they’re more cousins than brothers.
Being able to land in just 2,370 feet with a full cargo load blows my mind! That is absolute crazy talk for a bird that big! 🤯
Projection of power, c17 is a magestic plane
The C-130's wingspan is not what's stated, it's 100+ feet larger.
The same guy claims he got more length but no woman will or can verify the claim
Thank you to all of the people who designed and built the 223 C-17 Globe Master Jets in the USA Military. - TAV
You guys did a super duper job with the Afghanistan airlift. Congratulations!!!
The Moose is big, but handles like a fighter according to most C-17 Pilots I've spoke to. The Tactical Approaches are unreal for such a big airplane as much as 30 degree nose down with outboard engines in idle reverse thrust just hanging there from Flight level 20 all the way in.
19 hours just sitting there would suck.
22.5 Singapore to DC
C-130 wingspan 38ft 10 in? Same as my Cessna Skylane?????
When they first showed up at McChord AFB, Washington - Civil Air Patrol members were given tours - I realized I was sniffing NEW AIRPLANE SMELL!
Amazing video!
These are beautiful airplanes... the Indian airforce c17globmasters landed in ladakh region (DBO airbase at 16,614 ft)of India without any issues with equipment and supplies..this shows its capabilities
Wingspan on the c-130 is wrong
A lot smaller than the C-5
Yea, but A LOT more capable too.