I love TFD but what is with the Nutrafol marketing? The spiel given about the product even resonates with the topic of this video...some item promising overall wellness. Weird to see here
Not only is Nutrafol is extremely overpriced but after I spent hundreds of dollars on Nutrafol for women my doctor informed me that it doesn’t work for women with PCOS and even exacerbates the issue due to some of their ingredients spiking excess androgens further. Excess androgens is one of the main reasons why women experience hair loss in the first place. Do better TFD.
Right? Chelsea talked about the channel's critical views of the supplement industry just before playing an ad for supplements? Seems like a pretty contradictory message.
@@eggrat6right, but she does need to pay her bills and i think we shld utilise what tfd has taught us to again, not buy into it. To finally use what we've learnt into use lol.
‘Emotional eating’ isn’t exactly a clinical term. The reason for why “deprivation” can be perceived to activate ‘emotional eating’ has more to do with the emotional constructs behind it, not the absence of these constructs. Actually it is often one of the two most powerful emotional constructs that regulate behaviour: being shame or guilt. Whilst not exactly a clinical term, ‘emotional eating’ is still used as a shorthand for excessive consumption in response to an emotional state. It needs to be stated that restriction doesn’t always activate a negative emotional state, often the contrary is true, successfully executing tasks from an internal locus of control over daily habits can improve functioning, it is only when this control is excessive and causes significant harm is it considered ‘disordered’.
Supplements that have gone through clinical trials and have scientific evidence to back them up are fine. It's the snake oil garbage supplements that are the problem.
@@ekl2947 She stated during this episode that they have a whole episode on their Too Good to Be True podcast debunking supplements and essential oils. I listened to part of it.
So it’s being assumed here that supplements, essential oils, and hair growth are all ineffective, which is a false, or at least unproven equivalency. First of all, supplements are mixed bag, but the problem is they’re not regulated like regular medication so people think they’re always safe or always effective. Secondly, if you’re going to try to convince people of anything, then you need to post your own links to studies that show hair growth stuff as ineffective. You may very well be right, but you can’t call them out for their lack of research hypocrisy, and then cite none of your own
As someone with a binge eating and emotional eating problem, I can confidently say that not all overeating is the result of restriction. And it's a very dangerous message to be spreading. People often forget about the addictive nature of food, particularly the modern ultra processed food, but we shouldn't. It causes a lot of health issues if it isn't consumed in moderation. Please don't listen to this guest when she says all restriction is bad. With our modern food environment, we have to be conscious of our eating to stay healthy.
Thanks for this. What about the body positivity people who claim being morbidly obese is healthy via social media? Or all those binge eating videos or influencers eating junk food videos? It is much easier to maintain a healthy weight if you understand how many calories are in things and your own triggers. I don't keep chips, ice cream etc in my house because I will eat it. It is not good for me and it was literally designed to make me want more of it, disrupting my "intuitive eating".
I came here to say exactly this. It really seems like her perspective is skewed by drawing primarily from a pool of patients with restrictive eating disorders. I was someone who overate for my entire life and never dieted or restricted at all, and it was only by moving to high quality, nutritious foods that actually fill me up, and eating them in a restricted eating window (intermittent fasting) that I was able to gain control over my habits. My one meal a day is infinitely less disordered than my midnight mac n cheese habit used to be! I appreciate the shift away from diet culture, but she should really tune in to the greater population before making such generalized judgments
Is any restriction when it comes to food “disordered” also is intuitive eating possible with the presence of hyper palliative foods that are manufactured to get you to consume more and more?
I also want to know. I *have* to avoid a lot of foods because they physically will make me ill, due to severe lactose intolerance, and if I'm not vigilant about it, I immediately suffer. If I want to eat out with friends or share food with other people, my dietary needs have to come up, and every visit to a restaurant involves a lot of effort because I don't want to spend all night in the bathroom and then spend the week after in bed. As I've grown older and lost my ability to produce any lactase at all, the foods I can comfortably eat have reduced, and it has absolutely changed my relationship to food, often in distressing ways, but all the disordered eating and intuitive eating information I see ignores people who have actual food intolerances and allergies
Lol no, not all restriction is disordered. At least in the psychological diagnostic context, for something to be classified a ‘disorder’ it has to reach a threshold of causing significant impairment in multiple domains of someone’s life. Intuitive eating works under two main conditions: firstly the majority of food/beverage intake isn’t heavily processed (so yes the sugar/salt/fat manufactured ratio items that activate excessive consumption would be included in heavily processed); secondly no cognitive/physical impairment that would affect consumption be present. It’s a lil bit hard to intuitively eat if the items consumed may not meet the definition of ‘food’ lol, if certain items cause negative responses, like allergies and gut microbiota, or if you have conditions that impair functions like the prefrontal cortex or alexithymia (although it can be useful if concurrently undergoing treatment)
@@lunar686 Thanks! Although I have seen some Intuitive Eating advocates say that things like chips, sodas, cookies, fast food etc. count and that no food should be off limits but that isn’t an opinion I share. Edit: I think when we eat we should consider how this will make us feel not just in the immediate but in the long term too.
@@lunar686 What I understand, from what you wrote is that intuitive eating is not actually possible for all people, then. That's important to know, but contradicts the message that this dietician seemed to be sending, and that's frustrating because it makes it seem like it's someone's fault if they can't figure out how to make intuitive eating work with their medical needs
As an outsider it seems to me that some people who have had eating disorders project them onto the rest of us. If I want to change my diet or whatever else to reach my goals and don’t have an eating disorder there shouldn’t be anything wrong with that and not everybody who doesn’t eat intuitively is disordered, surely there is a middle ground.
Right, like if I have a beer every night because I’m bored and it leads to weight gain, saying “wow I need to stop doing this so much” isn’t a response to deprivation. Or eating ice cream when you’re sad doesn’t necessarily mean you restricted earlier, it means you’re reacting to negative emotions by eating when another response would probably be healthier
I do think emotional eating is tied to deprivation but it can also be due to having issues with emotional regulation and using food to numb emotions especially when there are no other healthy coping mechanisms in place.
Finally learnt that I had autistic traits at age 40....oh ...now I realize I sensory seek with food....oh plus the quetiapine tablets makes me have the appetite of an ogre. Lol! Yeah definitely looking for other functional, healthy, adaptive coping strategies/mechanisms. At least I'm a Millenial so I can go into my little dissociation bubble for a bit and pretend that the internet doesn't exist. Not too much but just about 10 hours a week so I can get some relief ( sensory time out)from the constant information and anxiety that social media creates. I also do about 20 hours of phone-free activities a week. That's way better than eating a whole chocolate cake...like before.
Totally. I have spent the last few years reshaping how I see food - nourishing my body, not moralizing etc. The shame and guilt around eating is gone and I overeat less than before... but when I have a bad day I still turn to food to comfort myself. For me it's not one or the other but both.
I do not agree with Christy regarding the restrictive eating. I do not ever restrict myself, but I still occasionally overeat. Does it mean I have an eating disorder? No. But it does mean that overeating doesn’t have to be caused by restricting.
While I agree that it's not useful or helpful to get so obsessed with ethical consumption that you lose sight of all else, I don't think advocating for policy changes IN PLACE OF trying to make good personal choices is the way to go. I think this is very much a both/and situation. Yes, policy changes at the corporate level would probably have a bigger impact, and yes, the range of individual choices are often limited depending on what the larger system enables them to choose. I definitely think we should avoid shaming ourselves if we can't manage to be perfect (we will never be perfect). But still, I think it makes total sense to try to live within your values to the extent that it lies within your power to do so. I don't think we can absolve ourselves of contributing to harmful practices when we are able to choose otherwise, just because The Big Corporations are contributing in even worse ways.
This was interesting and Christy has many good points, but I also think she generalizes too much. There's no magic bullet, one single approach will not heal everyone's relationship with food. And I find it dangerous to say "all your problems with food come from restriction, if you do not see it look harder". It can certainly be true for some people, especially folks with orthorexia, but for certain there will be others where it's not true and best case scenario, this just takes them to a dead end, worst case scenario, they gaslight themselves.
I love that you’re approaching this critically. However, neither of the people who reviews that book are dieticians - they are nutrition researchers. Additionally, the founder of Red Line Reviews, Guyenet, has was selling a weight loss course on his website. Saying that a book discouraging readers to pursue weight loss only serves in his financial best interest. However, I am also biased, as I found the anti-diet book, in combination with working with a registered dietitian, absolutely life changing.
I recognize we live in a post-truth world. However, I can't help but feel a researcher pointing how claims in a book don't align with the currently available research sounds like fact-checking, not bias. "I love that you're approaching this critically." sounds patronizing af.
@@melissabellemills2562 You are not being sensitive, it absolutely was patronizing. It's a "technique" ppl use to manipulate others: compliment them FIRST, get them on your side, then push your agenda. Honestly that commenter sounded like a paid shill.
@@CHSwildcats19Actually she admitted she was bias unlike the other person who did not acknowledge anything she said except for the critical thinking part.
Because of the sheer magnitude of the external factors we are forced to have disordered eating relationship in order to have NORMAL relaxed eating habits. Unless we do not consume any media of any kind. Except books 😊.
Of course not, don’t believe all the messaging about eating online, so much of it is projection from people who have deeply flawed relationships with food and hate to see that others don’t
Only if the reason is more of an excuse. Not that you can’t have multiple motivating reasons for any behaviour/behaviour change, but it has to meet a threshold of causing significant harm across multiple domains in your life to be considered a disorder. For example if you struggled to give up sugar, despite it causing significant harm in many areas of your life (such as preventable surgeries, financial struggles, time off work, stress within your relationships), then the addiction to sugar may be considered a disorder or a symptom of
This type of content is not what I come to this channel for. Seems like TFD has been moving further and further from financial discussions; a major bummer for someone who really values and recommends this channel.
I am only at the very start of this video, but I see a problem with this guest speaking about topics that she is not professionally competent to address. The definition of eating disorders is addressed by psychologists/psychiatrists. I'm sure she could collaborate with psychologists/psychiatrists as part of a team when treating individuals, but her credentials appear to be as a dietician which I don't believe gives her qualifications to address the psychological component of treatment. This is most obviously an issue when she talks about "sliding" into eating disorder. Mental disorders are defined as extreme relative to the general population, but they do have to be extreme to qualify as a disorder. As a comparison, almost everyone has anxiety but the standards for diagnosis of an anxiety disorder are not met by everyone. Additionally, I have relatives with (Type I and II) diabetes. They do have to put thought into their diet in order to care for themselves. They can get into good habits so that less thought goes into each meal, but "intuitive eating" is not totally possible because of some of the strong cravings that can be associated with these illnesses. The guest talks about how these people should be able to be more relaxed with food, but that moment reminded me of speaking about how poor people should just stop having a scarcity mindset. It's not realistic. Overall, I am unimpressed with this guest and disappointed she was hosted. EDIT: This is disappointing enough that I am questioning the quality of content on this channel as a whole, even when I generally consume it for entertainment. I think it's a reminder to look for more reputable sources for information.
I hear you, and to an extent, I agree. However, eating disorders can start from "healthy eating" and then quickly spiral into something more serious, which is what I believe Chelsea and Christy are saying. This happened to me in high school and I had to get professional help for it. What started as "eating more greens and less processed food" (which of course, is almost always a good thing) turned into extreme calorie restriction, intense anxiety over going to restaurants or cafes, and purging after eating "junk" food. It was all to keep my "healthy" body, which at the time I only equated to thinness. Also, there is a difference between an eating disorder and disordered eating. Disordered eating is when you have obsessive and uncontrollable thoughts around food that interfere with your daily life, which can then potentially lead into an eating disorder. That's the more "extreme" behavior you are referring to, stuff like anorexia, bullimia, purging, etc. Chelsea and Christy are discussing disordered eating, not necessarily eating disorders. www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/blog/eating-disorders-versus-disordered-eating
@@Atmviola I can see what you're saying, but healthy eating is different from a medically necessary restrictive diet, and this dietician also sounded like she was dismissing the vigilance those diets can sometimes require. I would love to relax about food all the time, but I know when I'm not eating at home, I can't be that relaxed, because I have severe lactose intolerance and in my country, lactose is present in soooooo many foods to the point where people don't even think about it
This whole episode was extremely disappointing. The guest made so many false claims and never addressed what a good, healthy diet is. Only that restriction is bad. But isn't her job as a dietician to give healthy dietary advice?
I think this guest was a real miss. When Chelsea said she intermittent fasts, Christy said IF is unhealthy. But Chelsea said she's not hungry in the mornings and then Christy says you should eat anyway even if youre not hungry?? Even though all she advocates for is intuitive eating and not eating in the mornings when you're not hungry is intuitive eating...She doesn't seem to know what shes talking about
@@robrobben6066 it is quite literally what she said. In fact, she said multiple times during the interview that sometimes you have to eat when you're not hungry.
I’ve also seen intuitive eating advocates question others when they intuitively grab fruit or veggies but they rarely make a peep when ppl intuitively grab processed or snack foods
I think the logic is, if you skip meals you might then overeat to make up for the skipped meal. I could be wrong. Havent finished the interview yet. Personally, If I'm not hungry for breakfast I just have yogurt and coffee.
@@mikelatenster9390 No, she basically said if you're not feeling hungry but then you regularly experience negative outcomes related to not eating, you should consider eating something even though you don't feel hungry. She also mentioned if there is a medical reason that you have a suppressed appetite, you may need to get in the habit of eating even when you don't feel hungry because your hunger is basically a broken barometer at that point. I think she's reacting against the rigid timing rules you typically see associated with intermittent fasting, not the general idea of eating when you're hungry and not eating when you're not, which is what intuitive eating is in the first place.
I'm going to lightly disagree on the conscious consumer point that the guest made... I'm just about to graduate with a degree in sustainability and there is a lot of indicators that the government will not regulate strictly if they are afraid of constituent backlash. Supporting ethical or environmentally friendly products show which companies hold power with the people. The government is going to be more interested in making changes if they think it will keep them popular. Additionally, regulation doesn't do as much as economic solutions such as carbon trading.
I would have liked a little more practical advice for over eating because, as someone who doesn’t restrict (and snacks quite often) I will eat until I’m sick if I’m upset. It’s not always because of restriction.
I think many of us feel the need to vote with our dollar because we don’t see enough meaningful change and feel that people we vote for consistently fall short of making change.
So true! What politicians openly care and talk about sustainable palm oil? None of them. So i will continue to vote with my dollar AND advocate for change
i wonder has any dietitian entertained an idea of food from the same side we talk about our savanna/monkey brains. maybe we should think of restrictions towards fast-food and snacks not as restrictions and more of a dietary hygiene. the world is filled with first so much food in general and second so many trashy foods that were not accessible at the time our guts were developing. you see where i’m getting at?
the thing about studies is...they may not apply to you, you kind of have to see what works for you. For some people who never were able to stick to a diet, a Keto One Meal a Day diet worked. Good for them if so. It's definitely not for everyone (see study results) but if it works for an individual then great.
Definitely do what works for you. I can only do low-calorie dieting with nutrient-dense food. So I can't cut out fat, sugar and carbs completely or fast. I do a part-time manual job and if I cut out things while on that job I will faint. What makes me feel good is when I have oats, yogurt, nut butter, soy milk, berries and stevia bowl before the job. This breaks so many diet trends rules but it's what works for me....and it's low calorie. That said I don't get normal hunger pangs.
The dessert lasagna is a snow cone. Whats so bad about that? Not all desserts have to calorie heavy or full of cream and sugar. I'm disappointed and confused by Chelsea's outrage over a rebranded snow cone.
I have Celiac Disease so I am forced to have a restrictive diet. That said I would never advocate for restricted diets for the general public. I think people ultimately have to do what works for them though because medicine is still learning about the different functions of the GI tract and their relation to gut health. So "the science" is by no means an exact science. One man's eating disorder may be another man's life-saving regimen.
I'm at 16:33 and I'm a little surprised by the comments but i do want to say that i appreciate this so far. I have overall had a really healthy relationship with food and my body. (I'm not a painting, I'm a person) but recently due to being around some weight obsessed people as well as recently getting married i believe i have been edging close to getting on track to disordered eating and I'm glad to be snapped out of it.
Tbh I think finding a video about flavored crushed ice "very upsetting" is an overreaction. 70% of Americans are overweight and 40% are obese, myself included. People do need to be learning about calories and there's nothing wrong with wanting to slim down to look good in a bikini for the summer.
This channel keeps trying to talk about disordered eating, and goes about it horribly every time. Please stop trying to talk about this subject because you get ED adjacent videos on your feeds(which you only get, because you keep engaging in the content).
Facts. I've been in and out of therapy for over 20 years. Nothing beats working your ass off psychologically but most people want an easy, quick fix....with everything. I like holistic wellness but I have no problems taking my butt off to Western medical doctors and my psychotherapist when my neurodivergent brain can't make sense of the world because they keep moving the goalposts.
I’m a little disappointed by Chelsea’s over reaction to the “dessert lasagna.” She said that this TikTok was posted during summer when a lot of people aren’t feeling good about their body being “beach ready,” but your negative body image is not this influencer’s fault. You can’t be mad at other people for your poor self image (unless of course they attack you or a group you belong to personally). It’s not like this was one of those photoshopped or FaceTuned bikini photos…I just don’t think it was a proportional response.
So you think the definition of dessert lasagna was accurate for that crap? People (women, esp) wouldn't have to come up with such disgusting "hacks" if it weren't for body image issues.
I agree. I didn’t see the full TikTok, but it seems like she just posted a sweet treat that she makes? Does dessert always have to be calorie-heavy? She basically made shave ice, which is delicious🤷♀️
@@tf4606 Some people really like chewing/crunching ice. (Not me personally, but a lot of people do.) it’s possible that she genuinely likes this. also, I don’t think that thinking of calories is necessarily indicative of a body image issue. I just think it’s a little bit of a leap in logic to say someone discussing calories in a item is body shaming or indicative of an unhealthy relationship with food.
13:00 I think the question about "honing our BS meter" is really interesting, and can be applied to a lot of contexts even outside of toxic diet culture. The rhetoric that "this is helpful to somebody out there" is in theory, a possibility, but I find that it is also a one-dimensional response that intentionally leaves out the framing of these diet tips. Someone presenting a way to cut calories as part of a dietary plan provided by a professional for their health, is very different than someone showing how to cut calories. And it's not just the content of the single video - it's the context the any influencers' history/background and their overall messaging, and also the culture within this video resides. It's not just about dieting, it can be applied to any type of content - we have to use media literacy to really gauge the impact that this content has and which audiences it's targetting.
It’s interesting how this topic truly strikes a nerve and engenders strong and sometimes defensive reactions from people. Eating, dieting, bodies and health are such intensely personal and culturally weighted topics.
As women, we are bombarded by it our entire lives. Ask little girls what a diet is. They all know. It makes sense we are defensive. It’s engrained in us from the start and so much is tied to our weight. Our personality, our hard work, our abilities are tied to our weight thanks to where we live.
I bet the guest dietician doesn’t want to be on camera because she is underweight. Just a guess, but it’s VERY common for dietitians to have eating disorders that they don’t want to address.
She has talked about her own disordered eating. And here’s the thing, most people with eating disorders are not so underweight that you would even notice. That’s a huge problem with eating disorder assumptions. That you can just tell someone has one by looking at them. It’s incredibly incorrect to assume that.
@MH-ve5sz I think the state of her body should not contribute to how valid her points her or not. And to be clear I actually don't agree with a lot of her points because I do think they are a bit unsupported based on the latest meta-studies. However I do think it's rude of you to make assumptions on what kind of body she has and then make assumptions on how she's dealing with eating disorders she may or she may not have. All of this based off of the fact she didn't use a camera. There may be plenty of reasons for that, but those are none of our business. I think in 2023 we can judge people (and women specifically) on the strength of their opinions and expertise, and not on how their bodies may or may not be like.
This comment section inappropriately unhinged. I don’t understand why so many people feel personally attacked and offended. I don’t know the guest from before, but she seems to come into the conversation which nothing but empathy and respect. Really enjoyed this podcast episode and will follow her channels!
You can disagree with the guest, which I do in some ways because I think her opinions were poorly supported (see my comment if you are interested), whilst not feeling "personally attacked and offended". It's ok to respectfully disagree with someone, it does not mean you hate them or they hate you. Or that anyone is offended. There can be constructive discourse on the internet without anyone getting overly emotional about it, which does seem to be the case of several of the comments.
It's very refreshing to see dieting culture being finally discussed from scientific perspective in the mainstream. Even if for now diet thinking seems to be so ingrained in our culture. For people interested in digging into the science behind it I can really recommend the Maintenance Phase podcast
It’s a difficult field of social studies, particularly as culture isn’t stagnant, it is constantly alive and changing, given how popular eating content is online, and the speed it changes, it’s an area worth staying up to date on. Particularly with the speed of the internet part, it’s interesting how certain trends are just repackaged versions of concerns dating back a long time
I care ( maybe too much) about my health but only my psychiatrist can tell me if I'm "disordered". Lol! everyone else can br filed in the irrelevant, unimportant, entertainment part of my brain. Everything with a grain/pinch of salt...or in my case dump a pound of salt on it when it doesn't come from my own personal professionals. 🤣
I found this conversation interesting. It gave me some questions to ask my doctor. I have always assumed that it is some combination of OCD and/or Autism that make me need to eat only certain foods. I felt called out about packing all of the food that I worry most about not having when I travel. How do other people manage travel anxiety?
Totally agree with you. I still pack snacks for air travel especially! There's not a lot of great food options in that limited environment. I like to avoid getting sick, because I'm forced to eat food I already know will make me feel sick. Also, it's way less expensive to pack your own snacks and a fun amusement on a 7+ hour plane ride! I make sure to download music / audio-books and buy magazines to focus my attention. Bringing/wearing something soft and comforting helps, too. :D
Watch out there will be a lot of pushback on this topic. But the pushback will just show how engrained diet and wellness culture is in our everyday life. It’s like breathing. Listening to diet culture is just a part of everyday life.
I don’t think it’s quite that simple, we live in an environment where our food is addictive and manufactured, and so trusting are feeling around food doesn’t always equate to an automatically balanced relationship
@clairbear1234 I think perhaps the dietician wasn't clear about this but intuitive eating is really more about eating what makes you feel good. For example, eating a few cookies might make someone feel good because they're tasty or eating cookies reminds them of their childhood or whatever, whereas for most people following eating a whole box of cookies they probably won't feel physically good. It's a balance and it often takes a bit of trial and error and careful observation of yourself to realise what makes you feel good. Often people fail to get there because they "slip up" and binge and beat themselves up for not having self control as opposed to having compassion for themselves because, as you said, we live in a world where foods are literally manufactured to be addictive, juxtaposed with the glorification of thinness in society. It's very reasonable that in this environment it can take some time to learn how to eat intuitively, and ideally with professional help.
Absolutely fabulous! Thank you so much for bringing this guest to us! HEALTH was my triggering word...but who defines my health? So many people want to! Clean eating is another, and now wellness! I hear you, sister! (MPH, RD)
Ice and sweetener? Absolutely not. I'm so glad I'm an Old Millenial who grew up eating a mango with salty sea water on a tropical beach digging my toes into the sand as a sensory joy and zero technology...or weird diet and exercise fads. USA is such a weird vacuum/echo chamber of toxic culture. Although I grew up in the Caribbean, I live in Europe now and I've been to Asia and Africa. Literally my Nigerian, Chinese and Italian colleagues and friends are always feeding me.....real food...not ice and artificial sweeteners. I don't know about South America but I went to visit my Puerto Rican in America extended family and they fed me real food not mass-produced factory stuff. This is definitely post-capitalist dystopian food stuff like Snowpiercer or the Matrix. I'ma stick to my island girl, bohemian, hippie, roots...and stay off of TikTok as much as possible. Lol!🤣🤣🤣
*Keeping< up with current trends and strategies can help traders stay ahead of the curve and make informed decisions, It is important for beginners in trading and investing to understand that success in these fields requires technical analysis, emotional maturity, and self-discipline. I must say trading offers more benefits than just holding. Thanks to analyst Eleanor Nelson Barnes, I've made over 9btc from day trading with his insights and signals. Great TA as always.*
One thing I know for certain is crypto is here to stay, the only thing that leaves is the people who don't manage their risk. Manage that, or the market will manage it for you. With the right strategies you will survive.
I’m from the UK 🇬🇧 I’ve been trading with Mrs Eleanor Nelson Barnes for a year and she has proven to be trusted and best broker. I strongly recommend her
Meet Eleanor first time at a meeting in Las Vegas early 2022. Her teachings on trading is fascinating. It's really an awesome experience whenever you trade with profit.
*Keeping< up with current trends and strategies can help traders stay ahead of the curve and make informed decisions, It is important for beginners in trading and investing to understand that success in these fields requires technical analysis, emotional maturity, and self-discipline. I must say trading offers more benefits than just holding. Thanks to analyst Eleanor Nelson Barnes, I've made over 9btc from day trading with his insights and signals. Great TA as always.*
One thing I know for certain is crypto is here to stay, the only thing that leaves is the people who don't manage their risk. Manage that, or the market will manage it for you. With the right strategies you will survive.
I love TFD but what is with the Nutrafol marketing? The spiel given about the product even resonates with the topic of this video...some item promising overall wellness. Weird to see here
Not only is Nutrafol is extremely overpriced but after I spent hundreds of dollars on Nutrafol for women my doctor informed me that it doesn’t work for women with PCOS and even exacerbates the issue due to some of their ingredients spiking excess androgens further. Excess androgens is one of the main reasons why women experience hair loss in the first place. Do better TFD.
Right? Chelsea talked about the channel's critical views of the supplement industry just before playing an ad for supplements? Seems like a pretty contradictory message.
@@eggrat6right, but she does need to pay her bills and i think we shld utilise what tfd has taught us to again, not buy into it. To finally use what we've learnt into use lol.
Loll I thought the nutrafol ad was going to be a joke. No mention of the irony with that? 😂
‘Emotional eating’ isn’t exactly a clinical term. The reason for why “deprivation” can be perceived to activate ‘emotional eating’ has more to do with the emotional constructs behind it, not the absence of these constructs. Actually it is often one of the two most powerful emotional constructs that regulate behaviour: being shame or guilt. Whilst not exactly a clinical term, ‘emotional eating’ is still used as a shorthand for excessive consumption in response to an emotional state. It needs to be stated that restriction doesn’t always activate a negative emotional state, often the contrary is true, successfully executing tasks from an internal locus of control over daily habits can improve functioning, it is only when this control is excessive and causes significant harm is it considered ‘disordered’.
I find it ironic that the channel debunks supplements and essential oils yet frequently advertises a hair growth supplement.
Hair growth is important. Have you seen Fleabag? Beauty standards are important in the US fyi.
Supplements that have gone through clinical trials and have scientific evidence to back them up are fine. It's the snake oil garbage supplements that are the problem.
@@ekl2947
She stated during this episode that they have a whole episode on their Too Good to Be True podcast debunking supplements and essential oils. I listened to part of it.
So it’s being assumed here that supplements, essential oils, and hair growth are all ineffective, which is a false, or at least unproven equivalency.
First of all, supplements are mixed bag, but the problem is they’re not regulated like regular medication so people think they’re always safe or always effective.
Secondly, if you’re going to try to convince people of anything, then you need to post your own links to studies that show hair growth stuff as ineffective.
You may very well be right, but you can’t call them out for their lack of research hypocrisy, and then cite none of your own
the hair supplement is one of the only supplement dermatologists recommend for alopecia and hair loss
As someone with a binge eating and emotional eating problem, I can confidently say that not all overeating is the result of restriction. And it's a very dangerous message to be spreading. People often forget about the addictive nature of food, particularly the modern ultra processed food, but we shouldn't. It causes a lot of health issues if it isn't consumed in moderation. Please don't listen to this guest when she says all restriction is bad. With our modern food environment, we have to be conscious of our eating to stay healthy.
Exactly! I hate this Anti-Diet Culture trend, it is going to make the obesity epidemic even worse.
There is no scientific evidence to food being "addictive"
Thanks for this. What about the body positivity people who claim being morbidly obese is healthy via social media? Or all those binge eating videos or influencers eating junk food videos? It is much easier to maintain a healthy weight if you understand how many calories are in things and your own triggers. I don't keep chips, ice cream etc in my house because I will eat it. It is not good for me and it was literally designed to make me want more of it, disrupting my "intuitive eating".
This 🎯 🎯
I came here to say exactly this. It really seems like her perspective is skewed by drawing primarily from a pool of patients with restrictive eating disorders. I was someone who overate for my entire life and never dieted or restricted at all, and it was only by moving to high quality, nutritious foods that actually fill me up, and eating them in a restricted eating window (intermittent fasting) that I was able to gain control over my habits. My one meal a day is infinitely less disordered than my midnight mac n cheese habit used to be! I appreciate the shift away from diet culture, but she should really tune in to the greater population before making such generalized judgments
Is any restriction when it comes to food “disordered” also is intuitive eating possible with the presence of hyper palliative foods that are manufactured to get you to consume more and more?
I have the same questions and I feel like it’s a big oversight on the part of discussions like this
I also want to know. I *have* to avoid a lot of foods because they physically will make me ill, due to severe lactose intolerance, and if I'm not vigilant about it, I immediately suffer. If I want to eat out with friends or share food with other people, my dietary needs have to come up, and every visit to a restaurant involves a lot of effort because I don't want to spend all night in the bathroom and then spend the week after in bed. As I've grown older and lost my ability to produce any lactase at all, the foods I can comfortably eat have reduced, and it has absolutely changed my relationship to food, often in distressing ways, but all the disordered eating and intuitive eating information I see ignores people who have actual food intolerances and allergies
Lol no, not all restriction is disordered. At least in the psychological diagnostic context, for something to be classified a ‘disorder’ it has to reach a threshold of causing significant impairment in multiple domains of someone’s life.
Intuitive eating works under two main conditions: firstly the majority of food/beverage intake isn’t heavily processed (so yes the sugar/salt/fat manufactured ratio items that activate excessive consumption would be included in heavily processed); secondly no cognitive/physical impairment that would affect consumption be present. It’s a lil bit hard to intuitively eat if the items consumed may not meet the definition of ‘food’ lol, if certain items cause negative responses, like allergies and gut microbiota, or if you have conditions that impair functions like the prefrontal cortex or alexithymia (although it can be useful if concurrently undergoing treatment)
@@lunar686 Thanks! Although I have seen some Intuitive Eating advocates say that things like chips, sodas, cookies, fast food etc. count and that no food should be off limits but that isn’t an opinion I share.
Edit: I think when we eat we should consider how this will make us feel not just in the immediate but in the long term too.
@@lunar686 What I understand, from what you wrote is that intuitive eating is not actually possible for all people, then. That's important to know, but contradicts the message that this dietician seemed to be sending, and that's frustrating because it makes it seem like it's someone's fault if they can't figure out how to make intuitive eating work with their medical needs
As an outsider it seems to me that some people who have had eating disorders project them onto the rest of us. If I want to change my diet or whatever else to reach my goals and don’t have an eating disorder there shouldn’t be anything wrong with that and not everybody who doesn’t eat intuitively is disordered, surely there is a middle ground.
I completely agree!
Thank you! I don’t know why we need to medicalize every aspect of our habits
Right, like if I have a beer every night because I’m bored and it leads to weight gain, saying “wow I need to stop doing this so much” isn’t a response to deprivation. Or eating ice cream when you’re sad doesn’t necessarily mean you restricted earlier, it means you’re reacting to negative emotions by eating when another response would probably be healthier
@@katiebatten5794yes indeed😅
Yeah I agree 100%
I do think emotional eating is tied to deprivation but it can also be due to having issues with emotional regulation and using food to numb emotions especially when there are no other healthy coping mechanisms in place.
Finally learnt that I had autistic traits at age 40....oh ...now I realize I sensory seek with food....oh plus the quetiapine tablets makes me have the appetite of an ogre. Lol! Yeah definitely looking for other functional, healthy, adaptive coping strategies/mechanisms. At least I'm a Millenial so I can go into my little dissociation bubble for a bit and pretend that the internet doesn't exist. Not too much but just about 10 hours a week so I can get some relief ( sensory time out)from the constant information and anxiety that social media creates. I also do about 20 hours of phone-free activities a week. That's way better than eating a whole chocolate cake...like before.
Totally. I have spent the last few years reshaping how I see food - nourishing my body, not moralizing etc. The shame and guilt around eating is gone and I overeat less than before... but when I have a bad day I still turn to food to comfort myself. For me it's not one or the other but both.
I do not agree with Christy regarding the restrictive eating. I do not ever restrict myself, but I still occasionally overeat. Does it mean I have an eating disorder? No. But it does mean that overeating doesn’t have to be caused by restricting.
While I agree that it's not useful or helpful to get so obsessed with ethical consumption that you lose sight of all else, I don't think advocating for policy changes IN PLACE OF trying to make good personal choices is the way to go. I think this is very much a both/and situation. Yes, policy changes at the corporate level would probably have a bigger impact, and yes, the range of individual choices are often limited depending on what the larger system enables them to choose. I definitely think we should avoid shaming ourselves if we can't manage to be perfect (we will never be perfect). But still, I think it makes total sense to try to live within your values to the extent that it lies within your power to do so. I don't think we can absolve ourselves of contributing to harmful practices when we are able to choose otherwise, just because The Big Corporations are contributing in even worse ways.
This was interesting and Christy has many good points, but I also think she generalizes too much. There's no magic bullet, one single approach will not heal everyone's relationship with food. And I find it dangerous to say "all your problems with food come from restriction, if you do not see it look harder". It can certainly be true for some people, especially folks with orthorexia, but for certain there will be others where it's not true and best case scenario, this just takes them to a dead end, worst case scenario, they gaslight themselves.
Excellent comment! 👏🏾
Seriously! Saying all your problems with food will be gone once you stop restricting is like telling a depressed to just be happy
Red Pen Reviews gave Harrison's book a 33% on scientific accuracy. It's a review worth reading. I'm all for calling out BS. Including hers.
Oooh interesting
I love that you’re approaching this critically.
However, neither of the people who reviews that book are dieticians - they are nutrition researchers. Additionally, the founder of Red Line Reviews, Guyenet, has was selling a weight loss course on his website. Saying that a book discouraging readers to pursue weight loss only serves in his financial best interest.
However, I am also biased, as I found the anti-diet book, in combination with working with a registered dietitian, absolutely life changing.
I recognize we live in a post-truth world. However, I can't help but feel a researcher pointing how claims in a book don't align with the currently available research sounds like fact-checking, not bias.
"I love that you're approaching this critically." sounds patronizing af.
@@melissabellemills2562 You are not being sensitive, it absolutely was patronizing. It's a "technique" ppl use to manipulate others: compliment them FIRST, get them on your side, then push your agenda. Honestly that commenter sounded like a paid shill.
@@CHSwildcats19Actually she admitted she was bias unlike the other person who did not acknowledge anything she said except for the critical thinking part.
Because of the sheer magnitude of the external factors we are forced to have disordered eating relationship in order to have NORMAL relaxed eating habits. Unless we do not consume any media of any kind. Except books 😊.
Sincere question, if I restrict sweets because of my cavities, is that toxic diet culture and disordered eating too?
No.
You aren’t snarking are you? You can restrict sweets for any reason and that’s not an eating disorder. This world has gone nuts.
Of course not, don’t believe all the messaging about eating online, so much of it is projection from people who have deeply flawed relationships with food and hate to see that others don’t
Only if the reason is more of an excuse. Not that you can’t have multiple motivating reasons for any behaviour/behaviour change, but it has to meet a threshold of causing significant harm across multiple domains in your life to be considered a disorder. For example if you struggled to give up sugar, despite it causing significant harm in many areas of your life (such as preventable surgeries, financial struggles, time off work, stress within your relationships), then the addiction to sugar may be considered a disorder or a symptom of
Why dont you just brush your teeth 2-3 times a day? Why do you need to restrict sweets for that?
Too much fluff, word salad, buzz words this episode. Take a shot every time you hear “dovetail”
Thank you for being real and authentic.
This type of content is not what I come to this channel for. Seems like TFD has been moving further and further from financial discussions; a major bummer for someone who really values and recommends this channel.
A video about the problems of wellness culture...sponsored by a hair growth supplement. I usually love TFD, but way to kill your own credibility.
I am only at the very start of this video, but I see a problem with this guest speaking about topics that she is not professionally competent to address. The definition of eating disorders is addressed by psychologists/psychiatrists. I'm sure she could collaborate with psychologists/psychiatrists as part of a team when treating individuals, but her credentials appear to be as a dietician which I don't believe gives her qualifications to address the psychological component of treatment. This is most obviously an issue when she talks about "sliding" into eating disorder. Mental disorders are defined as extreme relative to the general population, but they do have to be extreme to qualify as a disorder. As a comparison, almost everyone has anxiety but the standards for diagnosis of an anxiety disorder are not met by everyone.
Additionally, I have relatives with (Type I and II) diabetes. They do have to put thought into their diet in order to care for themselves. They can get into good habits so that less thought goes into each meal, but "intuitive eating" is not totally possible because of some of the strong cravings that can be associated with these illnesses. The guest talks about how these people should be able to be more relaxed with food, but that moment reminded me of speaking about how poor people should just stop having a scarcity mindset. It's not realistic. Overall, I am unimpressed with this guest and disappointed she was hosted.
EDIT: This is disappointing enough that I am questioning the quality of content on this channel as a whole, even when I generally consume it for entertainment. I think it's a reminder to look for more reputable sources for information.
This is such a long response for someone who is only at the "start" of the video.
I agree; I also can’t believe that they are criticizing “diet culture” and selling us hair supplements in the same video.
I hear you, and to an extent, I agree. However, eating disorders can start from "healthy eating" and then quickly spiral into something more serious, which is what I believe Chelsea and Christy are saying. This happened to me in high school and I had to get professional help for it. What started as "eating more greens and less processed food" (which of course, is almost always a good thing) turned into extreme calorie restriction, intense anxiety over going to restaurants or cafes, and purging after eating "junk" food. It was all to keep my "healthy" body, which at the time I only equated to thinness.
Also, there is a difference between an eating disorder and disordered eating. Disordered eating is when you have obsessive and uncontrollable thoughts around food that interfere with your daily life, which can then potentially lead into an eating disorder. That's the more "extreme" behavior you are referring to, stuff like anorexia, bullimia, purging, etc. Chelsea and Christy are discussing disordered eating, not necessarily eating disorders.
www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/blog/eating-disorders-versus-disordered-eating
@@Atmviola I can see what you're saying, but healthy eating is different from a medically necessary restrictive diet, and this dietician also sounded like she was dismissing the vigilance those diets can sometimes require. I would love to relax about food all the time, but I know when I'm not eating at home, I can't be that relaxed, because I have severe lactose intolerance and in my country, lactose is present in soooooo many foods to the point where people don't even think about it
This whole episode was extremely disappointing. The guest made so many false claims and never addressed what a good, healthy diet is. Only that restriction is bad. But isn't her job as a dietician to give healthy dietary advice?
I think this guest was a real miss. When Chelsea said she intermittent fasts, Christy said IF is unhealthy. But Chelsea said she's not hungry in the mornings and then Christy says you should eat anyway even if youre not hungry?? Even though all she advocates for is intuitive eating and not eating in the mornings when you're not hungry is intuitive eating...She doesn't seem to know what shes talking about
That is actually not what she said
@@robrobben6066 it is quite literally what she said. In fact, she said multiple times during the interview that sometimes you have to eat when you're not hungry.
I’ve also seen intuitive eating advocates question others when they intuitively grab fruit or veggies but they rarely make a peep when ppl intuitively grab processed or snack foods
I think the logic is, if you skip meals you might then overeat to make up for the skipped meal. I could be wrong. Havent finished the interview yet. Personally, If I'm not hungry for breakfast I just have yogurt and coffee.
@@mikelatenster9390 No, she basically said if you're not feeling hungry but then you regularly experience negative outcomes related to not eating, you should consider eating something even though you don't feel hungry. She also mentioned if there is a medical reason that you have a suppressed appetite, you may need to get in the habit of eating even when you don't feel hungry because your hunger is basically a broken barometer at that point. I think she's reacting against the rigid timing rules you typically see associated with intermittent fasting, not the general idea of eating when you're hungry and not eating when you're not, which is what intuitive eating is in the first place.
Watching this as I eat pizza and drink beer 😂
I'm going to lightly disagree on the conscious consumer point that the guest made... I'm just about to graduate with a degree in sustainability and there is a lot of indicators that the government will not regulate strictly if they are afraid of constituent backlash. Supporting ethical or environmentally friendly products show which companies hold power with the people. The government is going to be more interested in making changes if they think it will keep them popular. Additionally, regulation doesn't do as much as economic solutions such as carbon trading.
I would have liked a little more practical advice for over eating because, as someone who doesn’t restrict (and snacks quite often) I will eat until I’m sick if I’m upset. It’s not always because of restriction.
I think many of us feel the need to vote with our dollar because we don’t see enough meaningful change and feel that people we vote for consistently fall short of making change.
So true! What politicians openly care and talk about sustainable palm oil? None of them. So i will continue to vote with my dollar AND advocate for change
Agreed, that point the guest made was kind of depressing to me
i wonder has any dietitian entertained an idea of food from the same side we talk about our savanna/monkey brains.
maybe we should think of restrictions towards fast-food and snacks not as restrictions and more of a dietary hygiene. the world is filled with first so much food in general and second so many trashy foods that were not accessible at the time our guts were developing.
you see where i’m getting at?
What, paleo?
Anyone want to summarize the changes from the previous version that was posted?
the thing about studies is...they may not apply to you, you kind of have to see what works for you. For some people who never were able to stick to a diet, a Keto One Meal a Day diet worked. Good for them if so. It's definitely not for everyone (see study results) but if it works for an individual then great.
Definitely do what works for you. I can only do low-calorie dieting with nutrient-dense food. So I can't cut out fat, sugar and carbs completely or fast. I do a part-time manual job and if I cut out things while on that job I will faint. What makes me feel good is when I have oats, yogurt, nut butter, soy milk, berries and stevia bowl before the job. This breaks so many diet trends rules but it's what works for me....and it's low calorie. That said I don't get normal hunger pangs.
The dessert lasagna is a snow cone. Whats so bad about that? Not all desserts have to calorie heavy or full of cream and sugar. I'm disappointed and confused by Chelsea's outrage over a rebranded snow cone.
Omg I miss snow cones 🍧.... lol don’t think I’d want mine ‘lasagna flavoured’, but each to their own lol
@@lunar686it's not lasagna flavored, just similar to lasagna from the layers
A nutritious dessert can be yogurt does not have to be flavored water. The way people defend diet culture saddens me.
I have Celiac Disease so I am forced to have a restrictive diet. That said I would never advocate for restricted diets for the general public. I think people ultimately have to do what works for them though because medicine is still learning about the different functions of the GI tract and their relation to gut health. So "the science" is by no means an exact science. One man's eating disorder may be another man's life-saving regimen.
I'm at 16:33 and I'm a little surprised by the comments but i do want to say that i appreciate this so far. I have overall had a really healthy relationship with food and my body. (I'm not a painting, I'm a person) but recently due to being around some weight obsessed people as well as recently getting married i believe i have been edging close to getting on track to disordered eating and I'm glad to be snapped out of it.
Tbh I think finding a video about flavored crushed ice "very upsetting" is an overreaction. 70% of Americans are overweight and 40% are obese, myself included. People do need to be learning about calories and there's nothing wrong with wanting to slim down to look good in a bikini for the summer.
y'all still don't have artificial sweeteners banned? The ice thing looks like pica
This channel keeps trying to talk about disordered eating, and goes about it horribly every time. Please stop trying to talk about this subject because you get ED adjacent videos on your feeds(which you only get, because you keep engaging in the content).
I worked with a doctor who wondered why individuals would turn to unproven alternatives. I responded - it's easy to sell hope.
Facts. I've been in and out of therapy for over 20 years. Nothing beats working your ass off psychologically but most people want an easy, quick fix....with everything. I like holistic wellness but I have no problems taking my butt off to Western medical doctors and my psychotherapist when my neurodivergent brain can't make sense of the world because they keep moving the goalposts.
I’m a little disappointed by Chelsea’s over reaction to the “dessert lasagna.” She said that this TikTok was posted during summer when a lot of people aren’t feeling good about their body being “beach ready,” but your negative body image is not this influencer’s fault. You can’t be mad at other people for your poor self image (unless of course they attack you or a group you belong to personally). It’s not like this was one of those photoshopped or FaceTuned bikini photos…I just don’t think it was a proportional response.
So you think the definition of dessert lasagna was accurate for that crap? People (women, esp) wouldn't have to come up with such disgusting "hacks" if it weren't for body image issues.
I agree. I didn’t see the full TikTok, but it seems like she just posted a sweet treat that she makes? Does dessert always have to be calorie-heavy? She basically made shave ice, which is delicious🤷♀️
@@tf4606 Some people really like chewing/crunching ice. (Not me personally, but a lot of people do.) it’s possible that she genuinely likes this. also, I don’t think that thinking of calories is necessarily indicative of a body image issue. I just think it’s a little bit of a leap in logic to say someone discussing calories in a item is body shaming or indicative of an unhealthy relationship with food.
Huh I think also restriction binge cycle can happen with me when I’m low on money and basically have to stick to limited options 😢
13:00 I think the question about "honing our BS meter" is really interesting, and can be applied to a lot of contexts even outside of toxic diet culture. The rhetoric that "this is helpful to somebody out there" is in theory, a possibility, but I find that it is also a one-dimensional response that intentionally leaves out the framing of these diet tips. Someone presenting a way to cut calories as part of a dietary plan provided by a professional for their health, is very different than someone showing how to cut calories. And it's not just the content of the single video - it's the context the any influencers' history/background and their overall messaging, and also the culture within this video resides. It's not just about dieting, it can be applied to any type of content - we have to use media literacy to really gauge the impact that this content has and which audiences it's targetting.
It’s interesting how this topic truly strikes a nerve and engenders strong and sometimes defensive reactions from people. Eating, dieting, bodies and health are such intensely personal and culturally weighted topics.
As women, we are bombarded by it our entire lives. Ask little girls what a diet is. They all know. It makes sense we are defensive. It’s engrained in us from the start and so much is tied to our weight. Our personality, our hard work, our abilities are tied to our weight thanks to where we live.
@@elizabethwillis885 yes it is exhausting
I bet the guest dietician doesn’t want to be on camera because she is underweight. Just a guess, but it’s VERY common for dietitians to have eating disorders that they don’t want to address.
She has talked about her own disordered eating. And here’s the thing, most people with eating disorders are not so underweight that you would even notice. That’s a huge problem with eating disorder assumptions. That you can just tell someone has one by looking at them. It’s incredibly incorrect to assume that.
@MH-ve5sz I think the state of her body should not contribute to how valid her points her or not. And to be clear I actually don't agree with a lot of her points because I do think they are a bit unsupported based on the latest meta-studies. However I do think it's rude of you to make assumptions on what kind of body she has and then make assumptions on how she's dealing with eating disorders she may or she may not have. All of this based off of the fact she didn't use a camera. There may be plenty of reasons for that, but those are none of our business.
I think in 2023 we can judge people (and women specifically) on the strength of their opinions and expertise, and not on how their bodies may or may not be like.
This comment section inappropriately unhinged. I don’t understand why so many people feel personally attacked and offended. I don’t know the guest from before, but she seems to come into the conversation which nothing but empathy and respect. Really enjoyed this podcast episode and will follow her channels!
You can disagree with the guest, which I do in some ways because I think her opinions were poorly supported (see my comment if you are interested), whilst not feeling "personally attacked and offended". It's ok to respectfully disagree with someone, it does not mean you hate them or they hate you. Or that anyone is offended. There can be constructive discourse on the internet without anyone getting overly emotional about it, which does seem to be the case of several of the comments.
Because our symbiotic gut bacteria go reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee and grab for the metaphorical steering wheel lol
It's very refreshing to see dieting culture being finally discussed from scientific perspective in the mainstream. Even if for now diet thinking seems to be so ingrained in our culture.
For people interested in digging into the science behind it I can really recommend the Maintenance Phase podcast
It’s a difficult field of social studies, particularly as culture isn’t stagnant, it is constantly alive and changing, given how popular eating content is online, and the speed it changes, it’s an area worth staying up to date on. Particularly with the speed of the internet part, it’s interesting how certain trends are just repackaged versions of concerns dating back a long time
I don't buy into her speech. There's reasonable arguments, but not everything is well thought and founded.
Sugar should be regulated as a pharmaceutical
This!
Culture, schmulture...Caring about my own health is not "disordered".
I’ve always been fascinated by people who can miss a point entirely, good on you!
I care ( maybe too much) about my health but only my psychiatrist can tell me if I'm "disordered". Lol! everyone else can br filed in the irrelevant, unimportant, entertainment part of my brain. Everything with a grain/pinch of salt...or in my case dump a pound of salt on it when it doesn't come from my own personal professionals. 🤣
@@-natmac what point do you think they’re missing?
@@marleyhill34right?! Chrissy Harrison isn’t a mental health professional or a physician. She can’t diagnose eating disorders no dietician can.
@@2FINE4YOUBABYGIRL yeah people are playing fast and loose with their health..always get a second, third and fouth opinion.
Cheers from the Pacific West Coast of Canada
I found this conversation interesting. It gave me some questions to ask my doctor. I have always assumed that it is some combination of OCD and/or Autism that make me need to eat only certain foods. I felt called out about packing all of the food that I worry most about not having when I travel. How do other people manage travel anxiety?
Totally agree with you. I still pack snacks for air travel especially! There's not a lot of great food options in that limited environment. I like to avoid getting sick, because I'm forced to eat food I already know will make me feel sick. Also, it's way less expensive to pack your own snacks and a fun amusement on a 7+ hour plane ride! I make sure to download music / audio-books and buy magazines to focus my attention. Bringing/wearing something soft and comforting helps, too. :D
Love this episode, thanks! She's a great guest and such a relevant topic
Watch out there will be a lot of pushback on this topic. But the pushback will just show how engrained diet and wellness culture is in our everyday life. It’s like breathing. Listening to diet culture is just a part of everyday life.
This exactly
I don’t think it’s quite that simple, we live in an environment where our food is addictive and manufactured, and so trusting are feeling around food doesn’t always equate to an automatically balanced relationship
@clairbear1234 I think perhaps the dietician wasn't clear about this but intuitive eating is really more about eating what makes you feel good. For example, eating a few cookies might make someone feel good because they're tasty or eating cookies reminds them of their childhood or whatever, whereas for most people following eating a whole box of cookies they probably won't feel physically good. It's a balance and it often takes a bit of trial and error and careful observation of yourself to realise what makes you feel good. Often people fail to get there because they "slip up" and binge and beat themselves up for not having self control as opposed to having compassion for themselves because, as you said, we live in a world where foods are literally manufactured to be addictive, juxtaposed with the glorification of thinness in society. It's very reasonable that in this environment it can take some time to learn how to eat intuitively, and ideally with professional help.
Absolutely fabulous! Thank you so much for bringing this guest to us! HEALTH was my triggering word...but who defines my health? So many people want to! Clean eating is another, and now wellness! I hear you, sister! (MPH, RD)
I hate the term “clean eating.” It makes me physically cringe.
Ice and sweetener? Absolutely not. I'm so glad I'm an Old Millenial who grew up eating a mango with salty sea water on a tropical beach digging my toes into the sand as a sensory joy and zero technology...or weird diet and exercise fads. USA is such a weird vacuum/echo chamber of toxic culture. Although I grew up in the Caribbean, I live in Europe now and I've been to Asia and Africa. Literally my Nigerian, Chinese and Italian colleagues and friends are always feeding me.....real food...not ice and artificial sweeteners. I don't know about South America but I went to visit my Puerto Rican in America extended family and they fed me real food not mass-produced factory stuff. This is definitely post-capitalist dystopian food stuff like Snowpiercer or the Matrix. I'ma stick to my island girl, bohemian, hippie, roots...and stay off of TikTok as much as possible. Lol!🤣🤣🤣
Two of my fav content creators. So excited to watch this collab.
*Keeping< up with current trends and strategies can help traders stay ahead of the curve and make informed decisions, It is important for beginners in trading and investing to understand that success in these fields requires technical analysis, emotional maturity, and self-discipline. I must say trading offers more benefits than just holding. Thanks to analyst Eleanor Nelson Barnes, I've made over 9btc from day trading with his insights and signals. Great TA as always.*
One thing I know for certain is crypto is here to stay, the only thing that leaves is the people who don't manage their risk. Manage that, or the market will manage it for you. With the right strategies you will survive.
yea buddy time is just perfect for stacking!! day trading is the new earner. from texas speaking lol
I’m from the UK 🇬🇧 I’ve been trading with Mrs Eleanor Nelson Barnes for a year and she has proven to be trusted and best broker. I strongly recommend her
Meet Eleanor first time at a meeting in Las Vegas early
2022. Her teachings on trading is fascinating.
It's really an awesome experience whenever you trade with profit.
She is an expert with Great personality, Her technical indicator are outstanding. She always say patient is the key.
Love your dress!
*Keeping< up with current trends and strategies can help traders stay ahead of the curve and make informed decisions, It is important for beginners in trading and investing to understand that success in these fields requires technical analysis, emotional maturity, and self-discipline. I must say trading offers more benefits than just holding. Thanks to analyst Eleanor Nelson Barnes, I've made over 9btc from day trading with his insights and signals. Great TA as always.*
One thing I know for certain is crypto is here to stay, the only thing that leaves is the people who don't manage their risk. Manage that, or the market will manage it for you. With the right strategies you will survive.