I really like the space physics in this game, it truly feels like you're in space with how light the aircraft handles and it has the 6 degrees of freedom but at the same time you can still get on the enemies six and it feels like a classical dogfight..
@@WolfeSaber9933 It would make more sense in the real world instead of using RCS to just use thrust vectoring from the main engines. Real world rockets already use this to control there stages of powered flight.
@@cancelanime1507 Thrust vectoring the main propulsion system does offer options in space flight, however they cannot give the control we get in game. You can't move like a helicopter with an engine that can only move you in one vector. The RCS can do many vectors, but wouldn't be powerful enough for an orbital change. The rocket example is for change of orbital, not movement like another the ISS.
@@WolfeSaber9933 The amount of torque you would get from using the vectored thrust of the main engines can't be replicated with RCS thrusters unless there comically big and powerful like what you have in Star Citizen which is very unrealistic. It would still make sense to have RCS as a backup and to preform those "helicopter maneuvers" but I can't see it being used as the main control system for the classical three axis of flight.
@@cancelanime1507 By conventional means, probably. There's also gyroscopes that can help with the spinning, and new RCS thrusters in development that can allow for what I'm thinking. After all, we don't use giant rockets on our space stations to help keep their orbits, one's that are proportional to the size of engines on the Jackals and Skelters to the size of said space stations.
@@AliceGrimm97 different? This garbage has nothing to do with the franchise. People like you who overdose on copium would accept any shit thrown at them from devs, if it wasn't named cod then yeah it would probably have done better, just like other gamers branded on the same name while having nothing similar with it, hopefully you get it now
I would like to view this as a win because earlier in the game when the Olympus Mons battered SATO’s fleet yes it kind of put them on the backfoot for a little bit but with with SATO jacking the Olympus Mons, using it to batter SetDef’s fleet and the destruction of their shipyard was a much harder blow so the way I see it it’s a “If you hurt us, we’ll hurt you more” type of scenario plus most of their command structure was killed so this was huge strategic victory for SATO.
My favorite missions were the side missions not only becouse of the ship upgrades suit upgrades and other things but blowing set ships or killing there commanders is so fucking cool
Mostly artistic license but fire in space would happen for a short time as the gases on the ships are burning as they escape. You do know there is oxygen and other gases on the ship don't you. This has been tested in the real world in a vacuum to a degree.
Sub 4 More
I really like the space physics in this game, it truly feels like you're in space with how light the aircraft handles and it has the 6 degrees of freedom but at the same time you can still get on the enemies six and it feels like a classical dogfight..
Without the main engines and just using RCS, we can have space fighter combat like in the game, plus independent 0.50 cal turrets for defense.
@@WolfeSaber9933 It would make more sense in the real world instead of using RCS to just use thrust vectoring from the main engines. Real world rockets already use this to control there stages of powered flight.
@@cancelanime1507 Thrust vectoring the main propulsion system does offer options in space flight, however they cannot give the control we get in game. You can't move like a helicopter with an engine that can only move you in one vector. The RCS can do many vectors, but wouldn't be powerful enough for an orbital change.
The rocket example is for change of orbital, not movement like another the ISS.
@@WolfeSaber9933 The amount of torque you would get from using the vectored thrust of the main engines can't be replicated with RCS thrusters unless there comically big and powerful like what you have in Star Citizen which is very unrealistic. It would still make sense to have RCS as a backup and to preform those "helicopter maneuvers" but I can't see it being used as the main control system for the classical three axis of flight.
@@cancelanime1507 By conventional means, probably. There's also gyroscopes that can help with the spinning, and new RCS thrusters in development that can allow for what I'm thinking. After all, we don't use giant rockets on our space stations to help keep their orbits, one's that are proportional to the size of engines on the Jackals and Skelters to the size of said space stations.
“DOOM guy has control of the BFG!…I mean, F-Spar.”
Now, imagine the two concepts together.
@@WolfeSaber9933 Doomslayer with an F-spar would be insane.
@@1597B Well, I was talking about combining the two weapons together.
@@WolfeSaber9933 I concur that that is crazier.
@@WolfeSaber9933There wouldn't be enough bodybags if he showed up.
14:22 bois on the shipyard must be laughing their asses off!
well they did just watch their entire fleet die right in front of them, so not much laughing? More *what the fuck are we gonna do now*
If they were, it lasted about 5 hours at maximum,
Literally 30 minutes after this the ship yard was obliterated not much laughing
What the fuck people hated this game? It looks dope af!
True!
Just a weird trailer when people wanted ww2. I came around to the game and love it
You must be blind or smth. People hated it because it's not cod, it's some titanfall/halo knock off
@@01iverQueen So they hated it because it's different from the rest of the series? That sounds a bit silly lol.
@@AliceGrimm97 different? This garbage has nothing to do with the franchise. People like you who overdose on copium would accept any shit thrown at them from devs, if it wasn't named cod then yeah it would probably have done better, just like other gamers branded on the same name while having nothing similar with it, hopefully you get it now
Finally a descent COD. I love it 😍
You on drugs? This was the worst cod ever created lol
@@01iverQueen you're just wrong
@@ltdoc sales says otherwise lol you are a clown if you think this game was any good, I wonder why it was bundled up with cod ww2 to even sell at all
@@01iverQueen I'm a clown for enjoying a game? Damn bro
@@ltdoc lack of taste means that you might have covid, you should check yourself
Easily my favorite mission in the game, we were never meant to win. It was just a big f you to SetDef.
I would like to view this as a win because earlier in the game when the Olympus Mons battered SATO’s fleet yes it kind of put them on the backfoot for a little bit but with with SATO jacking the Olympus Mons, using it to batter SetDef’s fleet and the destruction of their shipyard was a much harder blow so the way I see it it’s a “If you hurt us, we’ll hurt you more” type of scenario plus most of their command structure was killed so this was huge strategic victory for SATO.
My favorite missions were the side missions not only becouse of the ship upgrades suit upgrades and other things but blowing set ships or killing there commanders is so fucking cool
Fire in space? Oh god!
Mostly artistic license but fire in space would happen for a short time as the gases on the ships are burning as they escape. You do know there is oxygen and other gases on the ship don't you. This has been tested in the real world in a vacuum to a degree.
This is just mobile suit gundam without gundams
👋🏻👍🏻💪🏻😎🔥
I'm 8+ different ethnicities I do as I see for against my own kind regusrless of what they do I still have the gavel
4th comment! Great gameplay bruh
I liked this game, can’t believe it did so poor.
Did they reuse the "Your guns are armed" "No they aren't (fire)" bit from the start of Black Ops 3?
Consider that Black Ops 3 was outright confusing and this title was somewhat decent in comparison. So they did owe us a little something.