I was once on an Air France B707 that did exactly that when departing Abu Dhabi ! One of the flight attendants told me that the skipper was ex Armee de l'aire ! He must have thought he was still flying a Mirage! He left the ground like a startled Snipe! Great fun.
@@joim3480 I was on the bloody plane, whatever angle it was, it was bloody steep! Everyone remarked on it. You were NOT on that aircraft so STFU. The aircraft only had a light load on board as was picking up at other stops in the Persian Gulf on the way up. In the 1970s regulations were not as stiff as they are today.
1. There are no passengers 2. There are no passenger seats 3. No luggage 4. No peanuts 5. Minimal fuel 6. They’re selling airplanes, not grandmas comfort.
MCAS is a longitudinal stability enhancement. It is not for stall prevention (although indirectly it helps) or to make the MAX handle like the NG (although it does); it was introduced to counteract the non-linear lift generated by the LEAP-1B engine nacelles at high AoA and give a steady increase in stick force as the stall is approached as required by regulation.
There is a lot misconceptions about such a steep climb. Any aircraft can do that, for as long as the airspeed creates lift over the wings. MCAS isnt just about angle of attack, but also airspeed. MCAS could have been on during this demonstration and not come into play, as the airspeed was always well above stall. As well, with the flaps down, even at flaps 1, the MCAS will not come on.
MCAS is literally only changing the handling of the plane, so you don't need extra simulator training because it would be so similar to the NG, that you could fly without much extra training if you had NG certification. MCAS works perfectly fine if you don't have any problems, but as we saw a single sensor failing allowed MCAS to crash the plane, which no software should be able to do..
@@mrpaulgrimm6129 this, both were. Politics has kept this beauty from flying and hopefully itll start again this year. All those new planes sitting around all this time its ridiculous.
@@sharko4093 as much as i feel bad for those 300 lives. This joke is getting old. Ironically this will be the safest aircraft after all those test and recertification.
@@jaytantoso4421 Hahahahahaja ...are you the CEO OF BOING...!!!! I BET you that piece of Crap is going to crash again and again....Just wait and remember my comment....
Always loved the 737 right from the early 100 and 200 series right up to the latest ones. The 737 was originally designed to be a feederliner for the larger B707 and 727s. Now it is actually bigger than both of those! Though it still carries the original 737/707/727 nose profile.
@@corrigenda70 I really dont think so, thinking about it all commercial aircraft displaying at Farnborough desplay with some flaps extended. It allows them fly slower and stay within the airport boundaries. I was airside during the airshow ( we were watching from A SHED, gone now) I don't think even the Boeing pilots knew the implications of the system at that stage.
Hello, is it OK to feature your clip in a my chanel for educational purposes (so-called temporary copyright.)? You can stop me from using your content at any time and it will be deleted immediately. It will be credited in the description & comments section with your name. Thanks, MM
Since the 2 fatal crashes of this aircraft in the last 6 months I would suggest that this plane has an aerodynamic problem on takeoff. On this video yes it does handle like a jet fighter but at this airshow the plane was not carrying any passengers or baggage in the hold. Also it would appear that the engines are pushed to far forward on the wing thus moving the centre of gravity forward. Of course I may be totally wrong but there is something not right on take off for 2 to crash in 6 months. Remember the Comet 4B mistakes can be made even with the best people in the business.
The Max really look like a mini 777 with those huge engines. As much as I like this aircraft, I can't seem to get off the constant debate about allowing it to fly or not.
@@AmbientMorality Did they ever prove the plane would get in to a HAA scenario in real world testing? The one pilot on youtube that has talked the most about the MAX has never said they did.
Two things; 1) the pilots should be certified to fly the 737 MAX even though with a properly functioning MCAS system it may fly like previous 737's because, 2) shit happens, like errors in the MCAS system. By the way, it wasn't the dead pilots, it wasn't the mechanics, it wasn't the lack of an optional safety device, it wasn't poorly designed sensor system, it wasn't a computer program that needed to be redesigned and it wasn't the janitor on the nightshift. It was an error in the software provided by a contractor.
Jason Traxler And it’s Boeing’s responsibility to make sure that new systems are successfully integrated....and to tell their pilots about it!! The buck stops with Boeing senior management and no one else. Disgusting how they’re desperately trying to shirk responsibility and blame everyone but themselves
This is really serious engineering. Aviation, aerodynamics as scientific branch have been developed from XX century to XXI century. The plane Boeing 737 MAX has really powerful engines, Leap, 56000 pounds thrust. Could be very short take off distance and reverse distance after landing, when wheels touch down the runway. An air navigation in video has performed with high quality, thanks to the pilot. We can feel huge kinetic and potential energy during take off and landing.
MCAS would not allow this angle of attack in a normaly loaded plane, therefore it must have been turned off for demo. Empty plane allows for more severe flying angles when power overides airframe instability.
normally max thrust is never used on takeoff. most runways are long enough for a more paced manoeuvre and then the climb-out as well at reduced power as noise reduction is a goal as well for residents under a flight path.
Im pretty sure that was close to a 90 degree climb. I envy that captain. Just imagine those roaring jet engines vertically pushing you into your seat, under your command. Godlike.
About 17 seconds to V1/Rotate from rollout :-) The MACS was for sure disabled because with that takeoff angle he was headed for a stall but of course before he lost pitch authority he brought the nose down...Nice.
@@rugger1009 Are you going to suicide me like that whistle blower got if I point out that hundreds of people are unavailable for comment due to MCAS? Go fly on a Boeing near a door plug.
Its nice to see they FINALLY got the 737 right. I was never a fan of the earlier one's especially the originals that were the only aircraft designed that had the engines surrounded by a fuel tank.
Boeing 737 max is the best and most beautifull airplanes you guys ever build include the 777,and its most comfortable as the older versions.good job guys
It's a beautiful plane! I love those winglets, and I'm proud of being working on the supply chain for this new LEAP engines, I work for the company that makes the fan blades, is an awesome process, proudly made it on Mexico! Grettings!
That demonstration is, of course, to happen when the pilot is conscientious that the computer is not giving the right signal, of course, with passengers. And this maneuverings should be done if a nuclear war start. In this case, a point that the cockpit does not have is the electronic device capable of detecting the first detonation of the war. Strategically, a nuclear war will never be declared. This is a new idea for Aeronautics: new ideas must come along the way. Are we good Engineers?, Friendly, Orlando.
MCAS only operates with flaps up, it would not have operated during this display. Even if it did, it doesn't prevent these kind on maneuvers, it just makes the aircraft feel more natural when doing them
(13) Boeing 737 MAX Airshow Demonstration - Farnborough - RUclips Dear Editor, I can not help revisiting the crash of AA flight 587 out of JFK Airport on Nov 12 ,2001. The aging composite A300 , the oldest in the AA fleet, had acquired 37550 flight hours. The crash was blamed on the copilot for using "too much" rudder not the controller who knew about the pending extreme turbulence. Every private pilot has been trained to aggressively use thee rudder as opposed to ailerons. 2 years later Air Transat flight 961 lost the rudder but not the vertical stabilizer it was attached too. If excess rudder deflection was that critical then the rudder should have failed prior to the catastrophic vertical stabilizer failure. FAA allowed a plane which could be taken down by suicidal pilot with a couple of rudder jabs to be certified. It should have had "Experimental" display at the entrance door. Passengers are not paying good money to fly in a research craft.
@JUAN ROMAN it was the first thing i noticed after flying on one last year.magnificent plane but has issues....lets hope they are fixed by october...thats my next trip on one.
In my first comment i did forget to say about the dynamics of take off we all know about V1 V2 rotate V3 and air density and air temperature for take off are very critical with a full load on board the aircraft at this time The efficiency of a wing is usually defined as the ratio of the lift it gives to the air resistance or drag expressed s a fraction of lift over drag This is not a constant for any wing but varies with the angle of incidence. Modern aircraft wings have changed beyond belief and are now very narrow and bend upwards massive amounts on takeoff to the dismay of some passengers! As one would expect the lift of the wing varies considerably with this angle the angle at which the lift begins to fall off being called the stalling angle. Instead of the air flowing smoothly and steadily over the upper surface of the wing which is full of vortices, this leads to many difficulties in the control of the aircraft and is very undesirable. Please note these are just my comments and thoughts on a very complex subject and let us all hope an answer is found quickly to reassure the flying public that the plane is safe
La Boeing tiene una gran ventaja; en todos los modelos que desarrolla,la base son los aviones de combate donde se prueban miles de tecnologias y composites , que despues pueden ser utilizadas en aerocomerciales comerciales.
It's a beautiful aircraft!!! Boeing should fix the M c a s system and test fly the heck out of it on the 737 max 8 system. I mean wring it out!!! And make lots of videos of the testing and show the results so everybody can see it! Show it doing loops if they have too!!! And get the pilots and crew up to speed in their training on the whole system..top to bottom!! They have to get the public trust and confidence back whatever it takes!!! Who cares how much it cost!!! THE BALL IS IN THEIR COURT...they can do it..they must do it!!!
That’s right.... fix the problem, get it to fly again, and sell more Max. Who the hell cares about those 350 lives that were lost. They were just casualties of business. Money more important than lives.
air asia with sub corp is indonesia air asia, malaysia air asia, thai air asia, india air asia, air asia zest, japan air asia, and air asia x. and lion air is lion indonesia, batik air, wings air, malindo air, thai lion, vietnam lion?
Very excellent & smooth takeoff by Boeing,I like the way this plane glides so freely with harmony in the air,it does it with a lot of ease & grace thanks to the superb Boeing engineering & craftsmanship 🧰🛠⚙️🔩⛏
En este video se observa que cuando alcanza la altura máxima del despegue, luego inclina la nariz y parece caer en picada. Con pasajeros y equipaje que pasaría?
You can be very sure it was disabled for this demo. No test pilot would fly that plane like that with it on. Wish we knew who the pilot was, that would be a enlightening conversation.
In Farnborough airshow, the test flight pilots show how steep they can climb on takeoff, so why the push down in Lion and Ethiobian new planes? that means MCAS is faulty and killer
At take-off, the plane has an uncomfortable steep climb like that of a fighter jet. Then, at landing, when the tires of the plane are on the ground, why is the plane making so much smoke on the tarmac?
FKtdyvan 2016 The smoke you're talking about was actually water. If you notice when the reverse thrusters are activated it kicks up a lot more water. There must've been a lot of moisture in the air because on take-off the engines had vapor vortexes which tends to happen when there is moisture in the air. It probably rained prior to this piece of video.
I truly hope Boeing can get there act together with this new jet. My "personal feeling" is they rushed the production of this plane. To stay competitive with the new Airbus A320NEO. And obviously by doing so we now know the results of that impulsivity. This in return only BOOSTS Airbus A320NEO sales and is terrible news for Boeing. Specifically Southwest vs JetBlue.
When I pay for a ticket this is how I want my takeoff to be
I was once on an Air France B707 that did exactly that when departing Abu Dhabi ! One of the flight attendants told me that the skipper was ex Armee de l'aire ! He must have thought he was still flying a Mirage! He left the ground like a startled Snipe! Great fun.
That a lots of Gs for you
When I pay a ticket and get assigned a 737MAX I ask for a refund.
@@joim3480 I was on the bloody plane, whatever angle it was, it was bloody steep! Everyone remarked on it. You were NOT on that aircraft so STFU. The aircraft only had a light load on board as was picking up at other stops in the Persian Gulf on the way up. In the 1970s regulations were not as stiff as they are today.
Alan Gale
Easy, big fella. Relax. It’s not that serious😊
00:45 did the pilots disabled the MCAS in order to do that?
youreale First you can disable MCAS and 2nd it is out of any normal Operation so MCAS does not try to decrease AoA
@@modernaviation6747 Glad to know that. Someone have to tell airlines pilots where that button is located...
The aircraft was not close to a stall. MCAS wouldn't kick in.
The difference is that here these pilots were aware of such a system.
Maybe the MCAS was not install during the airshow
Most airliners can do this when they takeoff with no passengers or baggage
and light fuel load.
They can do this regardless. It's not like there always pushing the line.
@@TELE6220 look at you trying to be a grammar pro.
@ian cotcher yes the plane can.
they can do this with full baggage passengers and load of fuel too.. just that passengers gets sick and sue the airline afterwards
@@sultanjaksel9624 nope. Stick shaker will go ham before you reach 30 degrees pitch
That takeoff is enough to turn the passenger seats into lavoratries because everyone would shit their pants
I hope they doubled up on the vomit bags.
LOL. Yea, the next generation laxative, courtesy of Boeing.
1. There are no passengers
2. There are no passenger seats
3. No luggage
4. No peanuts
5. Minimal fuel
6. They’re selling airplanes, not grandmas comfort.
The landing was outstanding.
@@hpygolkyone are you ok in the head
What a cool plane. I'm sure it went on to have an illustrious career and nothing bad ever happened.
The best thing about this comment is that its like three years before doors were blowing off and wheels falling off of them.
It really is a good looking plane
@Ikbal Mechanical this is the most tested plane currently. Hopefully it will be safer.
Great looking coffin.
@@robvoyles people died how dare you disrespect the deaths of 300!
@Ikbal Mechanical not funny!
Fuselage basically still the same as the old 720, 707, 727. Main difference is the length, wings, tail, engines and systems.
MCAS is a longitudinal stability enhancement. It is not for stall prevention (although indirectly it helps) or to make the MAX handle like the NG (although it does); it was introduced to counteract the non-linear lift generated by the LEAP-1B engine nacelles at high AoA and give a steady increase in stick force as the stall is approached as required by regulation.
Yeah a longitudinal stability enhancement implemented to stop the plane from stalling due to their engines...
Whatever MCAS is, it doesn't work, over 300 victims are proof of that.
it flies like a fighter jet... wowww..
niaj arslyn agree
*niaj arslyn:* Not any more!
They only forgot to add ejection seats for everyone😂
niaj arslyn - Only when it’s empty.
Leap-1B engine sounds like a fighter jet
There is a lot misconceptions about such a steep climb. Any aircraft can do that, for as long as the airspeed creates lift over the wings. MCAS isnt just about angle of attack, but also airspeed. MCAS could have been on during this demonstration and not come into play, as the airspeed was always well above stall. As well, with the flaps down, even at flaps 1, the MCAS will not come on.
bank angle, bank angle, bank angle, bank angle (tititititititititititit overspeed alarm) bank angle, bank angle (plane rips apart)
MCAS is literally only changing the handling of the plane, so you don't need extra simulator training because it would be so similar to the NG, that you could fly without much extra training if you had NG certification.
MCAS works perfectly fine if you don't have any problems, but as we saw a single sensor failing allowed MCAS to crash the plane, which no software should be able to do..
@@LunnarisLP Pilot training: runaway trim, cutoff, re-trim.
Depest condolences to all the 189 victims of Boeing 737 Max 8 Lion Air JT 610 which crashed at near Cape Karawang, Java Sea.
HOW ABOUT FLIGHT 309 OF ETHIOPIAN THAT CRASHED AFTER T/OFF AND KILLED EVERY ONE ?
@@solomonpilot2510 Comment was made probably before the crash happened. Still though, RIP everyone who crashed on the MAX.
It happens
Pilot error
@@mrpaulgrimm6129 this, both were. Politics has kept this beauty from flying and hopefully itll start again this year. All those new planes sitting around all this time its ridiculous.
They forgot to showcase the "computers nosedive ability".
And there it is, the ignorant troll with a cheap jab at the expense of others lives demonstrating a lack of understanding about the 737.
@@SPBurt1 Well I mean, as a person who's favorite aircraft is the 737 he's not exactly wrong. But the joke is cheap and old, I agree with that
@@sharko4093 as much as i feel bad for those 300 lives. This joke is getting old. Ironically this will be the safest aircraft after all those test and recertification.
@@jaytantoso4421 Well, hopefully so. They better pray there isn't a crash for at least 3 years after the aircraft is back in the air though
@@jaytantoso4421
Hahahahahaja
...are you the CEO OF BOING...!!!!
I BET you that piece of Crap is going to crash again and again....Just wait and remember my comment....
What is that large flash of flame at about 6:40 underneath the aircraft on rollout with reversers and brakes working hard??
That's just the anti-collision light
They must have had MCAS turned off to do that takeoff!
Who’s here after hearing about the Ethiopian Air plane crash😞😞Rip:( My thoughts and prayers are with all the families who lost their loved ones 💛
Nostalgia018 and Lion air
Its one of the most beautiful 737 ive ever seen.. I dont usually like 737.. Im more of a fan of 757 767 and 777 aircrafts.. But this is beautiful
@soaringtractor why are you on almost every comment..
It really is, hopefully Boeing can recover quickly from the unfortunate incidents of recent. Such incredible machines!
The MAX's winglets/sharklets/blended wing/tapered wings looks like diagonal stabilisers of high-performance/futuristic aircraft
Till it crashes, again
@soaringtractor i didnt know that now i know why it looks alot like the 707 thanks :)
Always loved the 737 right from the early 100 and 200 series right up to the latest ones. The 737 was originally designed to be a feederliner for the larger B707 and 727s. Now it is actually bigger than both of those! Though it still carries the original 737/707/727 nose profile.
My head can’t compute how responsive this thing is. It’s a marvel!
I respect Airbus, but Boeing will always be the king of airplanes in my opinion.
I respect your opinion, what do you base it on?
Martijn Blikman Fair enough - nothing negative to say on personal emotive choice :)
Mike Lembo Boeing forever...
Mike Lembo yessir 737-8 all the way
I love the design of the 737-800 I think my fav 738 is the scimitar version. The max is nice too
Were the pilots certified to fly the 737 MAX w/o the MCAS?
Main electric trim overrides MCAS.
This was at Farnborough way before any issues with MCAS.
Also, he seems to have done the display with first stage flaps on so MCAS wouldn't activate!
@@hugostiglitz6914 So, we might conclude that this was a deceptive flight?
@@corrigenda70 I really dont think so, thinking about it all commercial aircraft displaying at Farnborough desplay with some flaps extended. It allows them fly slower and stay within the airport boundaries. I was airside during the airshow ( we were watching from A SHED, gone now) I don't think even the Boeing pilots knew the implications of the system at that stage.
I think this video is upside down. This MAX goes insanely fast up instead of insanely fast down....
Ye......no...just remember, your insulting 346 lives, just saying
@Content Ripper Dw, I'm not targeting you😂
Hello, is it OK to feature your clip in a my chanel for educational purposes (so-called temporary copyright.)? You can stop me from using your content at any time and it will be deleted immediately.
It will be credited in the description & comments section with your name. Thanks, MM
Sergey322 hi
@@aviationin4k258 hi)
@@Sergey322 hi
no
@@louisebrillo06 loll
Looks more like a demonstration of the LEAP-1B thrust capability.
What's really amazing to me are the wing loads these twin engines can take.
It sounds like a 787 or quiet 777 upon spool up. VERY nice sound indeed. I can't wait for the 737 Max 10 version to come out...!!! Awesome job Boeing.
Since the 2 fatal crashes of this aircraft in the last 6 months I would suggest that this plane has an aerodynamic problem on takeoff. On this video yes it does handle like a jet fighter but at this airshow the plane was not carrying any passengers or baggage in the hold. Also it would appear that the engines are pushed to far forward on the wing thus moving the centre of gravity forward. Of course I may be totally wrong but there is something not right on take off for 2 to crash in 6 months. Remember the Comet 4B mistakes can be made even with the best people in the business.
Keith Dunderdale the engines are pushed forward so they can fit under the plane cuz theyre so huge
The Max really look like a mini 777 with those huge engines. As much as I like this aircraft, I can't seem to get off the constant debate about allowing it to fly or not.
It's fine. Easily the most scrutinised type of the last couple of decades. Fly with confidence!
It takes off almost vertically without getting in a stall. So why did they build in that MCAS ?
Because pitch is not the same thing as angle of attack. At no point here did they have a very high angle of attack
@@AmbientMorality Did they ever prove the plane would get in to a HAA scenario in real world testing? The one pilot on youtube that has talked the most about the MAX has never said they did.
I cannot get accustomed to those winglets yet!
They are weird, but they look cool.
Dave Smith they look horrible
FlyingMaxFr I know right!!! It's also hard for me to get used to the new tail. The winglets do look nice from the front angle though.
@@davesmith5092 Yet they are not the problem...
Two things; 1) the pilots should be certified to fly the 737 MAX even though with a properly functioning MCAS system it may fly like previous 737's because, 2) shit happens, like errors in the MCAS system. By the way, it wasn't the dead pilots, it wasn't the mechanics, it wasn't the lack of an optional safety device, it wasn't poorly designed sensor system, it wasn't a computer program that needed to be redesigned and it wasn't the janitor on the nightshift. It was an error in the software provided by a contractor.
Jason Traxler And it’s Boeing’s responsibility to make sure that new systems are successfully integrated....and to tell their pilots about it!! The buck stops with Boeing senior management and no one else. Disgusting how they’re desperately trying to shirk responsibility and blame everyone but themselves
No it’s poorly habit their fellow include the owner and employee No one ensure It
This is really serious engineering. Aviation, aerodynamics as scientific branch have been developed from XX century to XXI century. The plane Boeing 737 MAX has really powerful engines, Leap, 56000 pounds thrust. Could be very short take off distance and reverse distance after landing, when wheels touch down the runway. An air navigation in video has performed with high quality, thanks to the pilot. We can feel huge kinetic and potential energy during take off and landing.
MCAS would not allow this angle of attack in a normaly loaded plane, therefore it must have been turned off for demo. Empty plane allows for more severe flying angles when power overides airframe instability.
Wrong , MCAS is always on
MCAS won't kick in if the flaps extended.
Never heard the LEAP Engines roar like this. What a wonderful sound :D
normally max thrust is never used on takeoff. most runways are long enough for a more paced manoeuvre and then the climb-out as well at reduced power as noise reduction is a goal as well for residents under a flight path.
Im pretty sure that was close to a 90 degree climb. I envy that captain. Just imagine those roaring jet engines vertically pushing you into your seat, under your command. Godlike.
this didnt age well now did it
Shocking MCAS failures but still makes you smile inside as an aircraft enthusiast watching this big bird fly maneuvers like this.
Boeing is Best.
I beg to differ. If its a MAX, dont relax.
Still think so.?
About 17 seconds to V1/Rotate from rollout :-)
The MACS was for sure disabled because with that takeoff angle he was headed for a stall but of course before he lost pitch authority he brought the nose down...Nice.
this pilot had an advantage over other pilots, he must have known how to turn MCAS off.
He’s just not a third world pilot and actually knows how to fly the plane.
@@rugger1009 What happens when a pilot wants to whistle-blow against Boeing, does his MCAS suddenly help him commit suicide?
@@rogerrussell9544 - A 737 takes off somewhere in the world every couple of minutes. Its safety record is unmatched. You can go back to sleep now.
@@rugger1009 Are you going to suicide me like that whistle blower got if I point out that hundreds of people are unavailable for comment due to MCAS? Go fly on a Boeing near a door plug.
Its nice to see they FINALLY got the 737 right. I was never a fan of the earlier one's especially the originals that were the only aircraft designed that had the engines surrounded by a fuel tank.
Imagine being a passenger and the pilot has a flashback from Nam', so he decides to do a zoom takeoff like this one here!!! I'd shit my pants!!
What a boss landing :D
I am wondering how he did this while those stupid airlines crashed during the standard process
Ho do you explain the turbojets not sucking grass???
Absolutely beatiful aircraft and display .
Boeing 737 max is the best and most beautifull airplanes you guys ever build include the 777,and its most comfortable as the older versions.good job guys
What a pilot with proper training can do
0:56 foreshadowing???
Those reverse thrusters are amazing!
It's a beautiful plane! I love those winglets, and I'm proud of being working on the supply chain for this new LEAP engines, I work for the company that makes the fan blades, is an awesome process, proudly made it on Mexico! Grettings!
BOEING: *exists*
737 MAX: ima end this company’s whole career
@Dickie Madic want to try and call me that?
What camera use for these kind of videos?
btw, what will do the cool, fantastic wing-lets at landing with crosswinds? or is the plane immune against such winds?
You could switch on the mcas while taking off and then switch it off while in the air for demostration.
The 737 is simply the most successful & efficient commercial airliner of all time.
Was there meal service on this flight?
During their demo-flights they obviousely turned off the MCAS.
Because of the very steep angle of attack during their show-take off.
That demonstration is, of course, to happen when the pilot is conscientious that the computer is not giving the right signal, of course, with passengers.
And this maneuverings should be done if a nuclear war start. In this case, a point that the cockpit does not have is the electronic device capable of detecting the first detonation of the war. Strategically, a nuclear war will never be declared. This is a new idea for Aeronautics: new ideas must come along the way. Are we good Engineers?, Friendly, Orlando.
MCAS only operates with flaps up, it would not have operated during this display. Even if it did, it doesn't prevent these kind on maneuvers, it just makes the aircraft feel more natural when doing them
Very nice looking jet.and its back to being the back bone of the passenger jet industry.
No passengers, no crew, no payload, minimal fuel, But these pilots are still showing some amazing skill, that landing too, was toooo butteyyyy
(13) Boeing 737 MAX Airshow Demonstration - Farnborough - RUclips
Dear Editor,
I can not help revisiting the crash of AA flight 587 out of JFK Airport on Nov 12 ,2001. The aging composite A300 , the oldest in the AA fleet, had acquired 37550 flight hours. The crash was blamed on the copilot for using "too much" rudder not the controller who knew about the pending extreme turbulence. Every private pilot has been trained to aggressively use thee rudder as opposed to ailerons. 2 years later Air Transat flight 961 lost the rudder but not the vertical stabilizer it was attached too. If excess rudder deflection was that critical then the rudder should have failed prior to the catastrophic vertical stabilizer failure. FAA allowed a plane which could be taken down by suicidal pilot with a couple of rudder jabs to be certified. It should have had "Experimental" display at the entrance door. Passengers are not paying good money to fly in a research craft.
I cant believe how far forward those engines are!
@JUAN ROMAN it was the first thing i noticed after flying on one last year.magnificent plane but has issues....lets hope they are fixed by october...thats my next trip on one.
Definitely had the MCAS disabled.
They didn't demo how the MCAS takes over and slams you into the ground at mach 1.
WATCH THIS AWESOME FEATURE!!
Booom
Mcas was turned off for this display for sure
Why. The airspeed was no where near a stall. MCAS also uses aIrspeed to calculate whether it activates the trim.
Beautiful airplane, i hope the MCAS system gets resolve.
its indeed a stunning aircraft
Thats the most beautiful thing ive ever seen in my life. I want to meet that pilot.
In my first comment i did forget to say about the dynamics of take off we all know about V1 V2 rotate V3 and air density and air temperature for take off are very critical with a full load on board the aircraft at this time
The efficiency of a wing is usually defined as the ratio of the lift it gives to the air resistance or drag expressed s a fraction of lift over drag This is not a constant for any wing but varies with the angle of incidence.
Modern aircraft wings have changed beyond belief and are now very narrow and bend upwards massive amounts on takeoff to the dismay of some passengers!
As one would expect the lift of the wing varies considerably with this angle the angle at which the lift begins to fall off being called the stalling angle. Instead of the air flowing smoothly and steadily over the upper surface of the wing which is full of vortices, this leads to many difficulties in the control of the aircraft and is very undesirable.
Please note these are just my comments and thoughts on a very complex subject and let us all hope an answer is found quickly to reassure the flying public that the plane is safe
Careful now that aircraft might take matters into its own hands ( wings ) ...
La Boeing tiene una gran ventaja; en todos los modelos que desarrolla,la base son los aviones de combate donde se prueban miles de tecnologias y composites , que despues pueden ser utilizadas en aerocomerciales comerciales.
Beautiful and stunning display for this timeless classic.
Very nice pilot, i like your landing its amazing
It's a beautiful aircraft!!! Boeing should fix the M c a s system and test fly the heck out of it on the 737 max 8 system. I mean wring it out!!! And make lots of videos of the testing and show the results so everybody can see it! Show it doing loops if they have too!!! And get the pilots and crew up to speed in their training on the whole system..top to bottom!! They have to get the public trust and confidence back whatever it takes!!! Who cares how much it cost!!! THE BALL IS IN THEIR COURT...they can do it..they must do it!!!
That’s right.... fix the problem, get it to fly again, and sell more Max. Who the hell cares about those 350 lives that were lost. They were just casualties of business. Money more important than lives.
Is it same plane which had fille done last tow months ago?
which one lion air (indonesia) or air asia (malaysia) the biggers and the betters in south east asia?
air asia with sub corp is indonesia air asia, malaysia air asia, thai air asia, india air asia, air asia zest, japan air asia, and air asia x.
and lion air is lion indonesia, batik air, wings air, malindo air, thai lion, vietnam lion?
Are pilot standards equal for all airlines ???
nope
Very excellent & smooth takeoff by Boeing,I like the way this plane glides so freely with harmony in the air,it does it with a lot of ease & grace thanks to the superb Boeing engineering & craftsmanship 🧰🛠⚙️🔩⛏
Farei questão de voar no 737max logo depois da recertificação.
Why no inverted loops?
el avión del futuro después que resuelvan la biónica (computación)la aeronavagacion
Boeing max 8 has had 2 accidents and is now temporarily blocked in Indonesia
Those jet engines are only 17 inches above the ground. How low is too low?
En este video se observa que cuando alcanza la altura máxima del despegue, luego inclina la nariz y parece caer en picada. Con pasajeros y equipaje que pasaría?
Is this what check rides are in the big leagues?
Wow!!! What a great looking plane. Bravo!!!
what a sweet demonstration 737max hope mcas will perform better than before I love Boeing airplanez...
Is the MCAS Disabled?
You can be very sure it was disabled for this demo. No test pilot would fly that plane like that with it on. Wish we knew who the pilot was, that would be a enlightening conversation.
I could use one of those but I'd have to hire a FO. The best one I know already works for WN.
In Farnborough airshow, the test flight pilots show how steep they can climb on takeoff, so why the push down in Lion and Ethiobian new planes? that means MCAS is faulty and killer
superb recording!
beautiful plane!!!
That pilot must LOVE doing that! 🎉❤
At take-off, the plane has an uncomfortable steep climb like that of a fighter jet. Then, at landing, when the tires of the plane are on the ground, why is the plane making so much smoke on the tarmac?
FKtdyvan 2016 The smoke you're talking about was actually water. If you notice when the reverse thrusters are activated it kicks up a lot more water. There must've been a lot of moisture in the air because on take-off the engines had vapor vortexes which tends to happen when there is moisture in the air. It probably rained prior to this piece of video.
@@Murica-gh8bg Thank you for your explanation regarding the water on the tarmac upon the landing of the plane. I just forgot to think about that.
You've got to love a zoom climb.
how much it costs
Wonders why MCAS didn't kick in with that takeoff...
MashAllah Excellent
We love ❤️ Boeing
We love ❤️ to fly
Great people to fly with
imagine im inside that plane...that was so scary....
Why would I imagine you being inside the plane?
Wonder if MCAS EVER KICKED in .
Amazing airplane. Its unfortunate that Boeing had zero orders for this during this airshow.
Zero Hour sorry but your statement is Fake News. Stop doing drugs
soaringtractor No, you provide the figures.
A cette époque il fonctionnait bien apparemment ?
great tourist attraction here in Orlando FLORIDA
Esses pilotos tiveram bastante sorte do Avião não cair na apresentação....737MAX8
I truly hope Boeing can get there act together with this new jet. My "personal feeling" is they rushed the production of this plane. To stay competitive with the new Airbus A320NEO. And obviously by doing so we now know the results of that impulsivity. This in return only BOOSTS Airbus A320NEO sales and is terrible news for Boeing. Specifically Southwest vs JetBlue.