At 3:20, the "modification marks" I'm talking about are the carats over two S characters (š) and the slash through the last L (ł). It seems like all three of these instances are reflected in the logo design.
It’s clearly a G (not a Q). If you compare it to the other G, the cross bar is the same and hooks down and to the left. Even if you steal a big chunk of the E to close the form, that cross bar makes no sense for a Q.
two remarks: 1) That is a Q. I don't get what the hangup is. Uppercase Q and G look almost identical. 2) I bet that what you have as the Z of WELIARZ could actually be RZ because of the little divot in the top left. Look up polish handwriting to see how some people write RZ
Nah don't worry they're all in there trust me
At 3:20, the "modification marks" I'm talking about are the carats over two S characters (š) and the slash through the last L (ł). It seems like all three of these instances are reflected in the logo design.
I think the q is heavily stylized so that is could look like a c but with a tail going straight down.
"oh no, you just have to believe us" = "oh no, we can't admit we messed up"
Above the w looks like it could be an a but then there is still no place for the r, hope to see a resolution to this logo
It’s clearly a G (not a Q). If you compare it to the other G, the cross bar is the same and hooks down and to the left. Even if you steal a big chunk of the E to close the form, that cross bar makes no sense for a Q.
two remarks:
1) That is a Q. I don't get what the hangup is. Uppercase Q and G look almost identical.
2) I bet that what you have as the Z of WELIARZ could actually be RZ because of the little divot in the top left. Look up polish handwriting to see how some people write RZ
the q could be an open up Q with a tail extending down (like ↅ)