Was a bit lost @7:20, but then I understood it eventually. Thank you for breaking things down. You’ve made it a lot more easier to grasp the concept of using partial fractions to solve Laplace Transforms❤
And at 7.20. When he divides the numerator into two terms, how? Like how does he decide that, term A as 1 as a numerator, and term B has (s+2) as a numerator. This is exacly the same thing that profs. do! Whats the point of making an explanation, when the explanation is "there are a number of ways of doing xyz, i have chosen y" and then not explain what methods xyz are, and why method y is chosen or generally good or prefered in that situation. Somebody, @LearnChemE teach me teach'
Very helpful thanks! You guys who are complaining abt his mic. You guys shouldnt do that.. He is the one who give knowledge abt this and it is u guys who seek for his help (as u guys click his video).. You guys should matter the knowledge he wanted to share complaining abt his mic and so on. Its the value of the understanding that matters here not the mic or quality! Ppl nowadays ..
Completing the square part wasn’t very clear at 6:04 you say take the half the s value, then the square root of that, and you say it’s 1 but the sqrt(4/2) is not 1
Thanks for your comment. What he is saying is that you take half of 4, which is 2, then square that, which is 4 and that is the constant term. The difference is from the original equation to what how you completed the square: 5 - 4 or 1. I hope that helps.
Good videos but geez man did you record this on a dollar store microphone? If you are going to spends dozens of hours making recordings to be watched by thousands of people, logic would dictate that you would invest in a quality audio recording setup.
my ears were bombarded with amplified cosine and sine waves thanks to the position of this guys microphone!
Was a bit lost @7:20, but then I understood it eventually. Thank you for breaking things down. You’ve made it a lot more easier to grasp the concept of using partial fractions to solve Laplace Transforms❤
Thank you for the video. May I suggest that you invest in a pop filter? You can also try talking to the side of the mic instead of directly at it.
And at 7.20. When he divides the numerator into two terms, how? Like how does he decide that, term A as 1 as a numerator, and term B has (s+2) as a numerator. This is exacly the same thing that profs. do! Whats the point of making an explanation, when the explanation is "there are a number of ways of doing xyz, i have chosen y" and then not explain what methods xyz are, and why method y is chosen or generally good or prefered in that situation. Somebody, @LearnChemE teach me teach'
Awesome example! Well-done and well -explained!
Thanks man, fix the mic a bit and the video is perfect!
Why is there an s+2 in the numerator of B (7:15)
Can you go further how you came about the equation in 7:40?
www.symbolab.com/solver/roots-calculator/inverse%20laplace%20%5Cfrac%7B3s%5E%7B2%7D%2B5s%2B5%7D%7Bs%5Cleft(s%5E%7B2%7D%2B4s%2B5%5Cright)%7D
How did you get the s+2 in the numerator at (7:15)?
did you find out? my exam is today
Thanks man, I really like the Partial Fracitons method compared to using imaginary values and converting to time domain. Lovely video.
Very helpful thanks! You guys who are complaining abt his mic. You guys shouldnt do that.. He is the one who give knowledge abt this and it is u guys who seek for his help (as u guys click his video).. You guys should matter the knowledge he wanted to share complaining abt his mic and so on. Its the value of the understanding that matters here not the mic or quality! Ppl nowadays ..
youre literally insane. craked out of your mind. GG's
wooooohoooooo, thanks buddy. Was searching a lot and trying hard, thanks a ton
This is the most helpful video on this topic by far. Thank you.
This is really helpful for my Vibrations and controls class, thanks.
c K control analysis?
thank you for saving me from a 6-hour headache
Excellently explained
can be done with 3rd polynomial?
You did a very good job on explanation and choice of problems. I learned from this video
Thanks for saving me sir ❤️
Thank you from Yonsei univ south korea.
I like the way you solve it 😍
Fully informative practice
Thank you,sir
jeez dude move the mic away from your mouth
x,D
Hahahaha
What happens if the s is s^2 instead?
Thanks a lot👌👌😍😍
Thank you! you made this very plain and simple to understand :)
Very good explanation, thank you 😊
Great explanation! Thank you very much!
Completing the square part wasn’t very clear at 6:04 you say take the half the s value, then the square root of that, and you say it’s 1 but the sqrt(4/2) is not 1
Thanks for your comment. What he is saying is that you take half of 4, which is 2, then square that, which is 4 and that is the constant term. The difference is from the original equation to what how you completed the square: 5 - 4 or 1. I hope that helps.
sir u are the great
Woah lmao thank you so much, I was attempting to deal with the i's XD. Completely forgot about this.
Great explaination! Thanks a lot!
Great video, helped me a lot!!
great video sir
if we got a negative value for the outside value, what should we do?
This was a great video! Thank you!
great explanation .... God Bless
Amazingly helpful!
What a lovely town !
that was amazing< 3thank you!
You're the best thank you so much
had to log in to like - thanks for the explanation!
could the omega also be equal to -1 too? what would happen then?
Helped a lot! thank you
Thanks!
Thanks a lot.
SAVED ME!
cheers for this one my slime
If you want to learn from videos like this please stop criticizing the people who make the videos.
thanks
but what if we only have a number on the top? lets say 4. We cant solve for our letters that way?
late reply but maybe others can benefit; if you only had a number in the numerator then you don't have to do partial fractions. YAY ! lol.
thankss
Thank you !
How did you get that omega is eqaul to one? I did not get that part. Thank you!
thanks man, saved my ASS !!!
Finally I find it😁
plzzzz get a pop filter
3:57
Good videos but geez man did you record this on a dollar store microphone? If you are going to spends dozens of hours making recordings to be watched by thousands of people, logic would dictate that you would invest in a quality audio recording setup.
god job
i love u bro
awesome
thank
Idk why people are complaining about the mic, i hear you fine
my ears feel violated
The explanation @2.32 ish was straight terrible, somebody, what does table expressions 17. and 18. have that the others dont.
watch at 2x speed lads
please stop spit on my headphones dude. BTW thank you for explanation. :)
❤
Bs + C because MATHS bro
you talk too much man ...
and move the mic ...
and by the way i couldnt understand you are everywhere ...
from 8
tes pas cob toi c'est normal vous avez la nasa
tuutht thtith thti thu tho, Tunk tu tho
Unwatchable due to microphone
great video but someone get this man a pop filter lol
I'm wasting thousands of dollars on garbage education through a terrible program at an awful school.
Great Example Terrible Sound
Good job but there were no imaginary roots. #clickbait
if you don't use the completing the square on the denominator, the outcome of the denominator will be an imaginary roots. So it's not a a clickbaitm8
omg u have help me a lot thanes
Good video. Thank you!
Thanks