I've always wondered why a few critics ( David Hurwitz) say that Pollini is a cold fish. I am a professional pianist and Pollini is the incarnation of the Romantic genius.
In his younger years, Pollini approached the earlier Romantic pieces (by Chopin, Schumann, etc.) with brilliant technique, but with a sterile quality that lacked the feeling and emotional depth rendered them by other artists. Later in life, he admitted to this, stating that this was indeed his approach to music in his younger years, as music was but one of the many things he excelled at and therefore deemphasized. Later in life, however, he learned to genuinely honor and value music for its emotion and soulfulness, having decided to "plow full steam ahead" for his chosen craft. It is thus, therefore, that his later renditions are generally more musically appealing than his earlier recordings.
@@3YZ-TS191in short, he began to play slower, and made up excuses. His playing level fell off steeply as he aged. No argument that at his best he was superb
@marksmith3947 I disagree. In my opinion, he has always been technically superb. In his older years, he has learned to better honor the musical integrity of the piece, rendering a more reasoned approach to the score.
I don't quite understand your reasoning? Chopin would have made difficult studies because they were dedicated to Liszt? I don't think there is any connection between the intentions of making difficult etudes and the virtuosity of the dedicatee. By definition, an etude is always difficult to play. I simply believe that the "étude" style in general allows the performer to perfect his technique. In addition, Opus 25 is considered more technically difficult than Opus 10.
The op.25 etudes were first dedicated to his wife, Marie D'agoult (yes my username). But he told him it was for him because Chopin didn't want Liszt to know that he has a crush on Marie.
@@Thomas11611 this is not confirmend story how ever in this story is also that, that when he tryied to sight read them at the one of salones, he raged becouse he couldnt play them good avista and went back home where he practised them for whole (or two week i dont remeber) then he came back at salon and played them astonishingly
musically the best performance I have ever heard, played at just the right tempo to achieve this, so not too fast in other words, everyone plays it like its a race and miss all the excitement/tension.
Yes, I fully agree with you, this is played with perfect tempo, phrasing, musical nuance, and expression, all while being exceptionally clear; it is without a doubt one of the very best performances I have ever heard.
It really is remarkable that he's able to play it with such attention to dynamics, phrasing, and expression at this speed. He gives a shape to the piece as a whole, so instead of sounding like a motor stuck in high gear, it actually sounds like it's going somewhere.
Undertaker l Rousseau, a guy that makes covers on youtube, better than Pollini, one of the greatest pianists on earth???? Rousseau is not bad, but he is no one while Pollini is god! Rousseau has nothing compared to Pollini, he hasn't his agility and his sound. Sorry but do you play the piano? Have you got an idea of who Pollini is or you're a newbie? Because it's like you're saying that Taylor Swift can sing better than Whitney Houston.
I just checked with my metronome and he's pretty much close enough... Chopin's metronome marking is half note = 88 beats per minute. Pollini is around 84 or 85. So, he is a couple clicks under 88, but really, that starts getting very nit-picky. I still think Pollini's tempo is fantastic.
It's an amazing performance. Not only the technique, but also the musicality that comes from the sophistication that doesn't miss each note is excellent. Pollini is really a god in Chopin Etude.
love how much he brings out the left hand in this one! makes it feel so much more frantic and stormy as opposed to the more streamlined phrasing in other interpretations
Hmm, what about the left hand alone version by Godowsky? It's a little slower but seeing that sucker in concert may be one of the most impressive things I've ever seen and I only saw video of it.
I hope I can have those bragging rights soon! I've been learning this, and it's really coming along. When I finally get it down, this will be a new favorite piece to play. :)
Absolutely, but I think we agree that any practice exercise that is more difficult to play than the material it prepares the pianist for is a useless practice exercise.
Pollini is the best performer of Chopin's studies, there is none for anyone, no Askenazy, no Trifonov, no other winners of piano competitions, I'm sorry because they are all very good, but the recordings speak for themselves, he has a superior understanding of musical composition
If you play this at 0.25 playback speed you hear every note being played in perfect evenness, not a single note cut out or messed up. It’s played with ‘robot’ precision.
Chopin learned to compose the Nocturne form thanks to his visit in 1838 in Paris to the house of Carl Czerny! where Czerny played the Nocturnes of Op.368 and 607 and Chopin was delighted, Chopin and Liszt learned a lot from Czern and both played Czerny's plays on their tours as Concertistas! Liszt played Sonata Op.7 some etudes of Op.299,365,740 and Chopin Op.12, some etudes and Op.33
Chopin was the composer of this work(as well as a pianist), which is to say he wrote the music; Maurizio Pollini was the pianist who performed what was heard here.
I'm pretty sure thats what he meant. Chopin was a legitmate pianist to and I think he just admires his works. He can't obviously play them now himself, but his pieces sound amazing nonetheless
I love Pollini's aproach to the second to last chord. It's played in a very brutale manner that makes it have a bigger role than the last chord in this case.
You can do it. This is a tricky one, but it's highly pianistic and always within your hand (in fact there is only three arpeggios in which you'll have to play the thumb over the middle fingers or vice versa here: the f sharp minor in the two main sections and the G#-9 at the end of the middle section). The middle section where the hands are moving in opposite directions is commonly regarded as the hardest section, but even that isn't a big of a deal with slow metronome practice.
+DarkZekrom This concert etude is known for its difficult technique. As for hand motions, the necessary movement of the wrist stays constant, but it really depends on the performer. Even professionals must spend at least a half a year to a full year perfecting this to be able to play for competitions. If you look at the score, you'll see that the fingerings pretty sophisticated and that left-right correlation is extremely hard to get down. Many people also have trouble with the voicing in the piece and the phrasing. People often compare it to Flight of the Bumblebee for some reason, but that piece is just a chromatic scale with simple staccato chords while this etude is on a whole different level. Chopin purposely added difficult hand positions, for the purpose of an etude is to work on your technique. However, you'll find that the hand correlation is somewhat similar between the two pieces.
+iCST I can never resolve the competing needs of keeping a fairly rigid wrist in order to play the louder parts and accents with the need to keep a supple wrist in order to rotate when necessary (as in measure 3 and other similar passages).
Why does Chopin always sound like his mom told him to practice but he didn’t want to and just started running his fingers up and down the keys but it still sounded amazing?? He had so much talent!
Comparison between this and another highly viewed performance of the same Etude reveals the differences between a master of the piano and a master of PR ...
I’m about 8 recordings in, and this is the first one where all the distinct musical concepts in the middle passage are individually phrased and shaped and stand out with proper contrast from each other. I’m most other people’s interpretations, they run all the notes of the middle passage together without dynamic contrast and you can’t decipher all the little details and separate musical ideas.
Just think: Pollini was already playing both opuses (10 and 25) publicly by the age of 14. One of his signature moves at that young age was to refuse an international touring career and recording contract so he could finish school and his musical studies. What maturity (and genius) in one so young.
@zircofsky- 1:28 - haha I love that too. But my favorite part starts at 1:41 all the way to 1:52. 0:41 - 0:44 drove me crazy and is where I spent the most time, and I think 1:52 to the end I never quite mastered the way I wanted. Not to mention those three successive wickedly wide arpeggios that I couldn't do until my hands grew some more.
I was so excited to hear this at the start,the perfectly sustained ideal tempo;then at 1:39-1:40 came the nearly inevitable slowdown.Why do some pianists interpret it this way?It feels as if they're tiring;likewise,the pause before the final two chords.Seriously,the best version I've ever heard in my 54 years was Ray Turner on the LP of Sparky and the Magic Piano.Turner's interpretation tells a story Chopin himself maya not have intended.Each note is clear,the left hand strong and true.Bravo!!!
OH my god. I imagine myself playing this for my high school talent show and I will definitely win! I am planning play ballade no. 1 though, also awesome.
I have been trying for 35 years to achieve the left hand clarity that Pollini had in the Chopin Etudes, and Op. 10/4 in particular. I have not yet been successful.
"In Schumann's other writings about Chopin that exist from 1836 through 1842, there is a good deal of positive feedback, although one will likely glean that Schumann was disappointed that there was not more significant development or innovation. In fact, he said more than once that Chopin's work was instantly recognizable because it was all so similar. He acknowledged Chopin's original showing as fabulous, and worried that it was too much for him to be more than that. "When he has given you a whole succession of the rarest creations, and you understand him more easily, do you suddenly demand something different? This is like chopping down your pomegranate tree because it produces, year after year, nothing but pomegranates." And furthermore: "We fear he will never achieve a level higher than that he has already reached. . . . With his abilities he could have achieved far more, influencing the progress of our art as a whole." In his 1841 review of Chopin's Sonata in B-flat minor in particular, Schumann did not seem to be happy with his fellow composer's progress. Although he talks about the abundance of beauty in the work, he also says that the "sonata" as a title must be in jest: "[Chopin] seems to have taken four of his most unruly children and put them together, possibly thinking to smuggle them, as a sonata, into company where they might not be considered individually presentable." To Schumann it seemed that Chopin had lost his way, and gotten too wrapped up in virtuosity for its own sake. He decries "obstacles on almost every page" with indecipherable progressions. The second movement - again claiming the marking "Scherzo" was in name alone - he describes as a "funeral march with something even repulsive about it."" books.google.ca/books?id=OYo7DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA34
Chopin-Schumann are born the same year it seems . J don't writings about Frederic Chopin by Schumann but with two words only it seems for me that's more a rivalry than an objective thought ; in fact j don't undersatand what schumann mean , nothing . There is too comment to say , only some first about innovation , no innovation with Chopin ? it's a non-sense 100/100 because everybody knowns that Chopin-Listz are the two revolutionaries of piano-technic in first and also are revolutionaries in compositions except for Chopin about his Nocturnes ( with Field-nocturnes before Chopin ) . Also j read rarests news creations of Chopin : it's not necessary to write that it's a crazy , a mental-illness who can write here . Many things to say but what j read with sonata op35 is a enormous stupidity by someone who drank too ! sure. For all music-lovers the sonata 2 is for the first mvt : the revoit against the death , second the hope , funeral is a slow funeral no comment , last movement no virtuosity but it-s an other planet and nothing more after the death . But where is a Scherzo in the second movement ? J find j don't see where is something in the four scherzi of Chopin . The jealous beetwen composers seems unelikely , j don't known what j read with yo , in fact not with you but with Schumann
It's necessary to say that op10-4 of Chopin is very far from a masterpiece , with op10-4 j think Czerny no more . op10-4 is an exception in all compositions by Chopin !
Is it just me or does this sound exactly like the recording they used in the performance of this piece in your Lie in April? For audio comparision: ruclips.net/video/9UD-YeSp6es/видео.html
RIP Maestro. You'll never be forgotten.
I cant believe it have already been 2 months 😢
I've always wondered why a few critics ( David Hurwitz) say that Pollini is a cold fish. I am a professional pianist and Pollini is the incarnation of the Romantic genius.
Jealousy
In his younger years, Pollini approached the earlier Romantic pieces (by Chopin, Schumann, etc.) with brilliant technique, but with a sterile quality that lacked the feeling and emotional depth rendered them by other artists. Later in life, he admitted to this, stating that this was indeed his approach to music in his younger years, as music was but one of the many things he excelled at and therefore deemphasized. Later in life, however, he learned to genuinely honor and value music for its emotion and soulfulness, having decided to "plow full steam ahead" for his chosen craft. It is thus, therefore, that his later renditions are generally more musically appealing than his earlier recordings.
@@3YZ-TS191in short, he began to play slower, and made up excuses. His playing level fell off steeply as he aged. No argument that at his best he was superb
@marksmith3947 I disagree. In my opinion, he has always been technically superb. In his older years, he has learned to better honor the musical integrity of the piece, rendering a more reasoned approach to the score.
It’s true
Chopin himself dedicated his Op.10 etudes to Liszt, so there's no wonder that these are difficult and requires technical abilities.
Liszt sight read through all of them. That’s when it was dedicated to him by Chopin.
I don't quite understand your reasoning? Chopin would have made difficult studies because they were dedicated to Liszt? I don't think there is any connection between the intentions of making difficult etudes and the virtuosity of the dedicatee. By definition, an etude is always difficult to play.
I simply believe that the "étude" style in general allows the performer to perfect his technique.
In addition, Opus 25 is considered more technically difficult than Opus 10.
The op.25 etudes were first dedicated to his wife, Marie D'agoult (yes my username). But he told him it was for him because Chopin didn't want Liszt to know that he has a crush on Marie.
He wrote them before meeting Liszt
@@Thomas11611 this is not confirmend story how ever in this story is also that, that when he tryied to sight read them at the one of salones, he raged becouse he couldnt play them good avista and went back home where he practised them for whole (or two week i dont remeber) then he came back at salon and played them astonishingly
1:35 I get chills everytime
ME TOO
I always feel the same at that part.
musically the best performance I have ever heard, played at just the right tempo to achieve this, so not too fast in other words, everyone plays it like its a race and miss all the excitement/tension.
Yes, I fully agree with you, this is played with perfect tempo, phrasing, musical nuance, and expression, all while being exceptionally clear; it is without a doubt one of the very best performances I have ever heard.
mydogskips2 that's pretty much what I wanted to say, thanks.
It really is remarkable that he's able to play it with such attention to dynamics, phrasing, and expression at this speed. He gives a shape to the piece as a whole, so instead of sounding like a motor stuck in high gear, it actually sounds like it's going somewhere.
I thought Rosseau did better
Undertaker l Rousseau, a guy that makes covers on youtube, better than Pollini, one of the greatest pianists on earth???? Rousseau is not bad, but he is no one while Pollini is god! Rousseau has nothing compared to Pollini, he hasn't his agility and his sound. Sorry but do you play the piano? Have you got an idea of who Pollini is or you're a newbie? Because it's like you're saying that Taylor Swift can sing better than Whitney Houston.
I love it when pianists really dig into that cadence at 1:38, one of the fiercest and most thunderous passages of all of Chopin's repertoire.
Perfect!
Pollini's scale work in the left hand is impeccable.
fffff
I'm getting carpal tunnel just listening to this.
+Ben Bradshaw HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
I was like, "OMG, that's the LEFT hand playing that fast too," 0.o
Try No. 2 in the same Opus - I actually almost DID get carpal tunnel lol
XD
Ahahah! I can't even read your comment without getting a bit of it! (carpal)
I just checked with my metronome and he's pretty much close enough... Chopin's metronome marking is half note = 88 beats per minute. Pollini is around 84 or 85. So, he is a couple clicks under 88, but really, that starts getting very nit-picky. I still think Pollini's tempo is fantastic.
It's an amazing performance. Not only the technique, but also the musicality that comes from the sophistication that doesn't miss each note is excellent. Pollini is really a god in Chopin Etude.
RIP 23/03/2034 a legendary pianist
This piece snaps, crackles and pops under the masterful technique and musicianship of the legendary Pollini. Talk about a national treasure!
wow
I've heard a lot of great versions of this piece, but this one just feels so great.
one version is different by Cziffra all versions no difference
love how much he brings out the left hand in this one! makes it feel so much more frantic and stormy as opposed to the more streamlined phrasing in other interpretations
This pollini guy is legendary
Clarity beyond clarity. Like little darts poking into my unconscious. Beautiful recording. Love Pollini!
This is the very pinnacle of piano achievement, if you can play this you will have infinite bragging rights.
Hmm, what about the left hand alone version by Godowsky? It's a little slower but seeing that sucker in concert may be one of the most impressive things I've ever seen and I only saw video of it.
I hope I can have those bragging rights soon! I've been learning this, and it's really coming along. When I finally get it down, this will be a new favorite piece to play. :)
It's not _that_ hard. Come now. If it were it wouldn't be a very good etude.
It is hard to play it this well though
Absolutely, but I think we agree that any practice exercise that is more difficult to play than the material it prepares the pianist for is a useless practice exercise.
This interpretation sounds so clear, it's lovely
its the best
Unbeatable performance ! Best version ever ! Pollini is such a genius. I also believe no one beats his interpretations of Chopin's Etudes
Certainly the best interpretation that I've heard until now.
I really like Pollini's interpretation
This is everything I wanted to hear in music, so my ears are dancing with satisfaction. Bless Chopin and Pollini
1:54 Hey, I can play this part! :P
Impossible, i don't believe you
I can play op.10 no.1 sight reading
Left hand🤣🤣🤣
This is so balanced and he has so much control. Perfect.
Pollini is the best performer of Chopin's studies, there is none for anyone, no Askenazy, no Trifonov, no other winners of piano competitions, I'm sorry because they are all very good, but the recordings speak for themselves, he has a superior understanding of musical composition
If you play this at 0.25 playback speed you hear every note being played in perfect evenness, not a single note cut out or messed up. It’s played with ‘robot’ precision.
Pollini maintaning a great balance between force and speed. And that clarity!
Chopin learned to compose the Nocturne form thanks to his visit in 1838 in Paris to the house of Carl Czerny! where Czerny played the Nocturnes of Op.368 and 607 and Chopin was delighted, Chopin and Liszt learned a lot from Czern and both played Czerny's plays on their tours as Concertistas! Liszt played Sonata Op.7 some etudes of Op.299,365,740 and Chopin Op.12, some etudes and Op.33
i love Chopin etudes and pollini's play is my favorite💗
Pollini is the Lion under the Chopin-Etudes-Players!
The best-balanced execution ... Technique and musicality!
and this is why Chopin is one of my favorite pianists
Chopin was the composer of this work(as well as a pianist), which is to say he wrote the music; Maurizio Pollini was the pianist who performed what was heard here.
I'm pretty sure thats what he meant. Chopin was a legitmate pianist to and I think he just admires his works. He can't obviously play them now himself, but his pieces sound amazing nonetheless
I love Pollini's aproach to the second to last chord. It's played in a very brutale manner that makes it have a bigger role than the last chord in this case.
best etiud from chopin
I would agree if you spelled etude correct
Cudowna muzyka genialnego Chopina, boskie wykonanie.
Equilibrio e completezza...fantastico pollini
Holy Moly!! I guess that's why they call it an Etude, it teaches you that you can't play it like this!
Funniest comment I read in days!
이 곡을 준비하고 있을 모든 피아노 입시생들을 응원합니다.
입시생은 아니지만 감사합니다
너무너무싫어요 ㅠㅠ
@@심자자-y2e ㅠㅠ잘 해내실 수 있으실 거예요 파이팅😘
진쥬pearl 감사합니다 🥰
Rest in peace, Pollini.
You are my most admired pianist .
Thank you.
La migliore esecuzione di questo studio che ho ascoltato, migliore anche di quella di Horowitz a mio parere.
ancor oggi la miglior incisione di questo splendido etude..grazie Pollini
1:27-1:41 i could play it over and over again and never get tired of it!
What a masterful pianist he was! RIP
You can do it. This is a tricky one, but it's highly pianistic and always within your hand (in fact there is only three arpeggios in which you'll have to play the thumb over the middle fingers or vice versa here: the f sharp minor in the two main sections and the G#-9 at the end of the middle section). The middle section where the hands are moving in opposite directions is commonly regarded as the hardest section, but even that isn't a big of a deal with slow metronome practice.
Thanks for the advice. I’m going to start on this piece soonZ
You'd think they'd have hand cramps after playing that!
marianasreality It's really only the same hand motions over and over again, the most difficult part is the speed at which it's played.
+DarkZekrom This concert etude is known for its difficult technique. As for hand motions, the necessary movement of the wrist stays constant, but it really depends on the performer. Even professionals must spend at least a half a year to a full year perfecting this to be able to play for competitions. If you look at the score, you'll see that the fingerings pretty sophisticated and that left-right correlation is extremely hard to get down. Many people also have trouble with the voicing in the piece and the phrasing. People often compare it to Flight of the Bumblebee for some reason, but that piece is just a chromatic scale with simple staccato chords while this etude is on a whole different level. Chopin purposely added difficult hand positions, for the purpose of an etude is to work on your technique. However, you'll find that the hand correlation is somewhat similar between the two pieces.
+iCST I can never resolve the competing needs of keeping a fairly rigid wrist in order to play the louder parts and accents with the need to keep a supple wrist in order to rotate when necessary (as in measure 3 and other similar passages).
We do
DarkZekrom in the first mvt of Pathetique is baisically just left hand tremolos and its just torture
Bravo ! like the speed he play and is played smoothly.
Why does Chopin always sound like his mom told him to practice but he didn’t want to and just started running his fingers up and down the keys but it still sounded amazing?? He had so much talent!
This is madness! Love it!
Comparison between this and another highly viewed performance of the same Etude reveals the differences between a master of the piano and a master of PR ...
I’m about 8 recordings in, and this is the first one where all the distinct musical concepts in the middle passage are individually phrased and shaped and stand out with proper contrast from each other. I’m most other people’s interpretations, they run all the notes of the middle passage together without dynamic contrast and you can’t decipher all the little details and separate musical ideas.
unbelievably clear playing!
By far the very best interpretation for the coda
Just think: Pollini was already playing both opuses (10 and 25) publicly by the age of 14. One of his signature moves at that young age was to refuse an international touring career and recording contract so he could finish school and his musical studies. What maturity (and genius) in one so young.
Incredibile maestro!
for this piece, he is the best comparing to other pianist
@zircofsky- 1:28 - haha I love that too. But my favorite part starts at 1:41 all the way to 1:52. 0:41 - 0:44 drove me crazy and is where I spent the most time, and I think 1:52 to the end I never quite mastered the way I wanted. Not to mention those three successive wickedly wide arpeggios that I couldn't do until my hands grew some more.
That's incredibly beautiful!
I was so excited to hear this at the start,the perfectly sustained ideal tempo;then at 1:39-1:40 came the nearly inevitable slowdown.Why do some pianists interpret it this way?It feels as if they're tiring;likewise,the pause before the final two chords.Seriously,the best version I've ever heard in my 54 years was Ray Turner on the LP of Sparky and the Magic Piano.Turner's interpretation tells a story Chopin himself maya not have intended.Each note is clear,the left hand strong and true.Bravo!!!
I'm Learning Torrent in my academy. THIS IS SO FAST TO PLAY AND SO HARD
I don't know why I choose this for my dream.
Absolutely great.
대단하다.. 음이 딱딱 들리네...
Even though pollini made a slight mistake, this is one of the best interpretations I've heard
Etudes express his genius more much
and the polonaise
and the nocturnes
and the ballades
Mr Leok all of him pieces
And the mazurkas
La più straordinaria incisione ancora oggi dopo 40 anni!
Simply brilliant.
Beautiful piano playing! Thank you for posting :)
I could play this! I have to press the play button on my player though.😂
I am so jealous! I want to play this song! And pollini is the best!
Maestro pollini!!!
Perfect Chopin, perfect Pollini
Clean!
That's an exceptional recording!
Chopin must’ve been drunk or high when he wrote this
RIP Maestro Pollini 🥀
This piece is hard. He played it very well.
"Chopin composed only for the right hand" (Richard Wagner)
Revolutionary Etude would like to differ as well :p
This means that even great musicians can say stupid things.
Beatifully played.
OH my god. I imagine myself playing this for my high school talent show and I will definitely win! I am planning play ballade no. 1 though, also awesome.
MrLars061 yes I will do that :D
Li Kevin So, did you film it?
TheGuitarGod18 talent show is this decem
Li Kevin Alright, remind me when you post it!
TheGuitarGod18 I will!! :D
I have been trying for 35 years to achieve the left hand clarity that Pollini had in the Chopin Etudes, and Op. 10/4 in particular. I have not yet been successful.
Bis, Bis bravissimo. Not to fast not too slow, perfectly played
이곡만큼은 폴리니 피아니스트의 것이 최고네요
Those last 3 C#'s... I can do it.
야.....흐려지는 음이 하나도 없고 모두 또렸하고 명쾌하게 들리네. 이게 월드클래스다.
콩쿨이여서 들으러 왔더만 다 영어여;;
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
여기 한국어요^!^
저도 이거 콩쿨 나갈건데...
((반쯤 포기했어여......
전라도사투리여
@@asdffdsaasdfdsasdfds 사투리구먼
Anyone who says this is easy has clearly not played it.
Pollini amazing WoW i like You You are nice pianist
Pollini Inarrivabile negli studi di Chopin.
Love the slower chords at 1:40
That should be Pollini or a machine. Well maybe they are the same.
brilliant technique
wow. mr. etude was very talented
RFGaming Eoin no no "etude" is a type of a piece. chopin is the name of the composer
let me just put this on the list of songs ive heard before and now know who they’re made by
Pollini.....this is so fucking clean it’s painful
음이 다 들리네 와우
Keeping time by nodding your head on this song is a terrible idea...
Piece not a song
This is a good thing. Pianists should show some rubato (deviation from normal beat) at the right times to make the music more tasteful!
Miss Myoozikal you can do it to the half note
Rubato in this etude?
Very funny, and true (unless you are Rowlf, of course).
Warmusic throw the Killers tone Against Goliat, to walk on snakes scorpions, the konst of art MUST FIGHT FOR EXISTENS
My arms get tired so easily when I play this piece
Yay i finally found the jurassic park theme song
This is what mania sounds like
"In Schumann's other writings about Chopin that exist from 1836 through 1842, there is a good deal of positive feedback, although one will likely glean that Schumann was disappointed that there was not more significant development or innovation. In fact, he said more than once that Chopin's work was instantly recognizable because it was all so similar. He acknowledged Chopin's original showing as fabulous, and worried that it was too much for him to be more than that. "When he has given you a whole succession of the rarest creations, and you understand him more easily, do you suddenly demand something different? This is like chopping down your pomegranate tree because it produces, year after year, nothing but pomegranates." And furthermore: "We fear he will never achieve a level higher than that he has already reached. . . . With his abilities he could have achieved far more, influencing the progress of our art as a whole."
In his 1841 review of Chopin's Sonata in B-flat minor in particular, Schumann did not seem to be happy with his fellow composer's progress. Although he talks about the abundance of beauty in the work, he also says that the "sonata" as a title must be in jest: "[Chopin] seems to have taken four of his most unruly children and put them together, possibly thinking to smuggle them, as a sonata, into company where they might not be considered individually presentable." To Schumann it seemed that Chopin had lost his way, and gotten too wrapped up in virtuosity for its own sake. He decries "obstacles on almost every page" with indecipherable progressions. The second movement - again claiming the marking "Scherzo" was in name alone - he describes as a "funeral march with something even repulsive about it.""
books.google.ca/books?id=OYo7DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA34
Chopin-Schumann are born the same year it seems . J don't writings about Frederic Chopin by Schumann but with two words only it seems for me that's more a rivalry than an objective thought ; in fact j don't undersatand what schumann mean , nothing . There is too comment to say , only some first about innovation , no innovation with Chopin ? it's a non-sense 100/100 because everybody knowns that Chopin-Listz are the two revolutionaries of piano-technic in first and also are revolutionaries in compositions except for Chopin about his Nocturnes ( with Field-nocturnes before Chopin ) . Also j read rarests news creations of Chopin : it's not necessary to write that it's a crazy , a mental-illness who can write here . Many things to say but what j read with sonata op35 is a enormous stupidity by someone who drank too ! sure. For all music-lovers the sonata 2 is for the first mvt : the revoit against the death , second the hope , funeral is a slow funeral no comment , last movement no virtuosity but it-s an other planet and nothing more after the death . But where is a Scherzo in the second movement ? J find j don't see where is something in the four scherzi of Chopin . The jealous beetwen composers seems unelikely , j don't known what j read with yo , in fact not with you but with Schumann
If you are french more easy for me
It's necessary to say that op10-4 of Chopin is very far from a masterpiece , with op10-4 j think Czerny no more . op10-4 is an exception in all compositions by Chopin !
@@alainspiteri502 Very far from a masterpiece? Very far? Are you standing on your head?
Is it just me or does this sound exactly like the recording they used in the performance of this piece in your Lie in April? For audio comparision: ruclips.net/video/9UD-YeSp6es/видео.html
listening to this kills me ego, thanks :D