What blunder? The ref got it right and var reviewed it and clearly showed there was zero contact on the ball from the fcsb player. The first 3 angles actually look like a reffing howler but the 4th angle clearly shows zero contact made to the ball so 100% a foul. Not that it made a difference anyway
Video title is misleading. Ref said he should have let the move continue instead of blowing the whistle. The decision was correct - Clearly a foul - Not a Butland blunder.
Going to be another conspiracy. The ref and VAR gave the decision for us. We still deserved to win the game. 🏴🇬🇧🏴
It is refreshing to hear a manager giving an honest summary of the game without trying to make excuses !
What blunder? The ref got it right and var reviewed it and clearly showed there was zero contact on the ball from the fcsb player. The first 3 angles actually look like a reffing howler but the 4th angle clearly shows zero contact made to the ball so 100% a foul. Not that it made a difference anyway
Var couldn’t review it because ref made a mistake by blowing the whistle before the ball went in the net
Video title is misleading.
Ref said he should have let the move continue instead of blowing the whistle.
The decision was correct - Clearly a foul - Not a Butland blunder.
It was a foul get over it rangers 4 fcsb niiiillll
All im going to say is .... He's eating his words now 😂😂 4-nill haha we win. Next 👍
Clear foul.Clear penalty.
Ok. Let's call it 4-1.
@@cgibbyrfcloyal naw 4_0 is the official result.