nay. Tongues are in churches all over the world. Tongues will cease when we see him face to face, why would you need it then?. 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. Mar 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. Mar 16:17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; Mar 16:20 And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen. If no tongues this is prove you are not preaching the gospel for the Lord to confirm.
The according to you, there are only three accounts in the New Testament when anyone preached the true Gospel. Nice try. Please read 1 Cor 15:1-4 carefully. No tongues are required to confirm.
@@docmlm6644 This letter was written to those who already spoke in tongues. So taking a text out of context is foolish. 1Co 15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 1Co 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 1Co 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 1Co 15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Dear sir, the comments section to my broadcasts are not intended for people who have not listened to the contents to come in and drop unhinged and irrelevant comments, but rather for people who have carefully listened and have specific questions or relevant difference of opinion. This broadcast is not about when tongues cease or whether churches all over the world are babbling in non-languages, as you probably teach. This broadcast was about the verses predicting the arrival of tongues, which identify much about their purpose. I’m guessing since you probably have no clue that tongues in the Bible are always the miraculous ability to speak fluently to people in their own languages, you think that the fabricated babbling nonsense going on “around the world” has anything to do with everyone that preaches the gospel. Please listen to the broadcast regarding who Jesus was talking to in Mark 16. You probably interpret it the same way I did in the past until Hod showed me I was wrong. As far as Corinth already having tongues, as you say, when Paul defined the Gospel to them in 1 Cor 15, read it again carefully. Paul said in the verses he preached that Gospel to them when he was there, and there is no indication he promoted tongues while he was there, and no one would have talked in tongues before he came there in Acts 18, because that is when he preached the Gospel to them and they got saved. There is no mention of tongues at Corinth until he wrote his epistle. When he does writes the epistle he addresses tongues because according to Paul himself, they were ignorant of spiritual gifts. Read carefully 1 Cor. 12:1 and 14:36-38. They were also a very problematic church. Paul didn’t have to rebuke any other church on this issue. I recommend that you listen to my broadcast #5 in this series that discusses tongues at Corinth. Now listen close - there is no record anywhere in the Bible of the biblical gift of tongues operating at Corinth. Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t. There is no record. There are only three records of their manifestation in the Acts period. Acts 2, Acts 10 and Acts 19. The Corinthians obviously had a problem with talking in unknown languages that nobody understood. That is not the gift of tongues. So what you have built about tongues already reaching Corinth associated with Paul preaching the gospel to them is a “straw man.” In fact, if you add tongues to the Gospel of 1 Cor 15 you are preaching “another Gospel” according to Galatians 1:6-9, you are under a double curse. Instead of dumping random opinions, why not listen to the broadcast and ask intelligent questions? And even better, click on the link I provide for my tract giving 66 things the Pentecostal/charismatic can’t find in the word of God. There are plenty in the list for every brand of of delusional glossamaniac. Then contact me with book chapter and verse for ANY of them if you can. You won’t. Also, if you have any documented accounts of anyone talking in legitimate biblical tongues, please email them to me, and we will put them and you to the test. Again, please limit your comments here to ones relevant to the broadcast. And if you can’t sit and listen to the whole thing, please don’t waste my time. This post is only for people who are serious about the truth regarding tongues. Have a good day sir. And have you obeyed the Gospel of 1 Corinthians 15 (without adding tongues) for salvation?
@@docmlm6644 I have listened an know full well what is being said. Dear Sir, Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this important topic. I'd like to address some of the points you've raised, using scripture to provide clarity. Presence of Tongues in Corinth: While you mention there's no record of the gift of tongues operating in Corinth, Paul's extensive discourse in 1 Corinthians chapters 12 to 14 suggests otherwise. He provides specific instructions on the use of tongues within the church: 1 Corinthians 12:10 includes "various kinds of tongues" among the spiritual gifts. 1 Corinthians 14:5 states, "I wish you all spoke with tongues..." 1 Corinthians 14:18 says, "I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all." These passages indicate that tongues were indeed present and active in the Corinthian church, necessitating Paul's guidance on their proper use. Nature of Tongues: While Acts 2 describes tongues as known human languages understood by various nationalities present (Acts 2:6-11), Paul speaks of tongues that are not understood by others: 1 Corinthians 14:2 states, "For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries." This suggests that tongues can also be a spiritual language not recognized by human listeners, serving for personal edification (1 Corinthians 14:4). Definition of the Gospel: You mentioned 1 Corinthians 15, where Paul recounts the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. It's important to note that while Paul emphasizes these critical events, he is not providing an exhaustive definition of the gospel. The gospel encompasses the good news of the Kingdom of God, which Jesus preached extensively: Mark 1:14-15 says, "Jesus came to Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, 'The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe in the gospel.'" Therefore, the gospel is about the arrival of God's kingdom and includes Jesus' teachings, miracles, death, and resurrection. Paul's focus in 1 Corinthians 15 highlights the foundational truths of Christ's resurrection but does not limit the gospel to these points alone. Adding Tongues to the Gospel: Acknowledging the operation of spiritual gifts does not equate to altering the gospel message. The gospel remains centered on the kingdom of God and salvation through Jesus Christ. Spiritual gifts, including tongues, are given for the edification of the church (1 Corinthians 12:7) and should not be considered prerequisites for salvation. Paul warns against adding requirements to the gospel for salvation (Galatians 1:6-9). Use of Tongues Today: While there are differing views on the continuation of tongues, many believers testify to the genuine experience of this gift in accordance with scriptural guidelines. Paul's instructions encourage orderly practice rather than cessation (1 Corinthians 14:39-40). Conclusion: I encourage you to consider these scriptural references and reflect on their implications. Open dialogue and thorough examination of the scriptures can lead to a deeper understanding. Thank you for engaging in this discussion.
nay. Tongues are in churches all over the world. Tongues will cease when we see him face to face, why would you need it then?.
16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Mar 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
Mar 16:17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
Mar 16:20 And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.
If no tongues this is prove you are not preaching the gospel for the Lord to confirm.
The according to you, there are only three accounts in the New Testament when anyone preached the true Gospel. Nice try. Please read 1 Cor 15:1-4 carefully. No tongues are required to confirm.
@@docmlm6644 This letter was written to those who already spoke in tongues. So taking a text out of context is foolish.
1Co 15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
1Co 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
1Co 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
1Co 15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
@@docmlm6644 ruclips.net/video/6kda3HM7JAc/видео.html
Dear sir, the comments section to my broadcasts are not intended for people who have not listened to the contents to come in and drop unhinged and irrelevant comments, but rather for people who have carefully listened and have specific questions or relevant difference of opinion. This broadcast is not about when tongues cease or whether churches all over the world are babbling in non-languages, as you probably teach. This broadcast was about the verses predicting the arrival of tongues, which identify much about their purpose. I’m guessing since you probably have no clue that tongues in the Bible are always the miraculous ability to speak fluently to people in their own languages, you think that the fabricated babbling nonsense going on “around the world” has anything to do with everyone that preaches the gospel. Please listen to the broadcast regarding who Jesus was talking to in Mark 16. You probably interpret it the same way I did in the past until Hod showed me I was wrong. As far as Corinth already having tongues, as you say, when Paul defined the Gospel to them in 1 Cor 15, read it again carefully. Paul said in the verses he preached that Gospel to them when he was there, and there is no indication he promoted tongues while he was there, and no one would have talked in tongues before he came there in Acts 18, because that is when he preached the Gospel to them and they got saved. There is no mention of tongues at Corinth until he wrote his epistle. When he does writes the epistle he addresses tongues because according to Paul himself, they were ignorant of spiritual gifts. Read carefully 1 Cor. 12:1 and 14:36-38. They were also a very problematic church. Paul didn’t have to rebuke any other church on this issue. I recommend that you listen to my broadcast #5 in this series that discusses tongues at Corinth. Now listen close - there is no record anywhere in the Bible of the biblical gift of tongues operating at Corinth. Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t. There is no record. There are only three records of their manifestation in the Acts period. Acts 2, Acts 10 and Acts 19. The Corinthians obviously had a problem with talking in unknown languages that nobody understood. That is not the gift of tongues. So what you have built about tongues already reaching Corinth associated with Paul preaching the gospel to them is a “straw man.” In fact, if you add tongues to the Gospel of 1 Cor 15 you are preaching “another Gospel” according to Galatians 1:6-9, you are under a double curse. Instead of dumping random opinions, why not listen to the broadcast and ask intelligent questions? And even better, click on the link I provide for my tract giving 66 things the Pentecostal/charismatic can’t find in the word of God. There are plenty in the list for every brand of of delusional glossamaniac. Then contact me with book chapter and verse for ANY of them if you can. You won’t. Also, if you have any documented accounts of anyone talking in legitimate biblical tongues, please email them to me, and we will put them and you to the test. Again, please limit your comments here to ones relevant to the broadcast. And if you can’t sit and listen to the whole thing, please don’t waste my time. This post is only for people who are serious about the truth regarding tongues. Have a good day sir. And have you obeyed the Gospel of 1 Corinthians 15 (without adding tongues) for salvation?
@@docmlm6644 I have listened an know full well what is being said. Dear Sir,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this important topic. I'd like to address some of the points you've raised, using scripture to provide clarity.
Presence of Tongues in Corinth:
While you mention there's no record of the gift of tongues operating in Corinth, Paul's extensive discourse in 1 Corinthians chapters 12 to 14 suggests otherwise. He provides specific instructions on the use of tongues within the church:
1 Corinthians 12:10 includes "various kinds of tongues" among the spiritual gifts.
1 Corinthians 14:5 states, "I wish you all spoke with tongues..."
1 Corinthians 14:18 says, "I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all."
These passages indicate that tongues were indeed present and active in the Corinthian church, necessitating Paul's guidance on their proper use.
Nature of Tongues:
While Acts 2 describes tongues as known human languages understood by various nationalities present (Acts 2:6-11), Paul speaks of tongues that are not understood by others:
1 Corinthians 14:2 states, "For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries."
This suggests that tongues can also be a spiritual language not recognized by human listeners, serving for personal edification (1 Corinthians 14:4).
Definition of the Gospel:
You mentioned 1 Corinthians 15, where Paul recounts the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. It's important to note that while Paul emphasizes these critical events, he is not providing an exhaustive definition of the gospel. The gospel encompasses the good news of the Kingdom of God, which Jesus preached extensively:
Mark 1:14-15 says, "Jesus came to Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, 'The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe in the gospel.'"
Therefore, the gospel is about the arrival of God's kingdom and includes Jesus' teachings, miracles, death, and resurrection. Paul's focus in 1 Corinthians 15 highlights the foundational truths of Christ's resurrection but does not limit the gospel to these points alone.
Adding Tongues to the Gospel:
Acknowledging the operation of spiritual gifts does not equate to altering the gospel message. The gospel remains centered on the kingdom of God and salvation through Jesus Christ. Spiritual gifts, including tongues, are given for the edification of the church (1 Corinthians 12:7) and should not be considered prerequisites for salvation. Paul warns against adding requirements to the gospel for salvation (Galatians 1:6-9).
Use of Tongues Today:
While there are differing views on the continuation of tongues, many believers testify to the genuine experience of this gift in accordance with scriptural guidelines. Paul's instructions encourage orderly practice rather than cessation (1 Corinthians 14:39-40).
Conclusion:
I encourage you to consider these scriptural references and reflect on their implications. Open dialogue and thorough examination of the scriptures can lead to a deeper understanding.
Thank you for engaging in this discussion.