You should be skeptical 100% of the time. It's like a flashing yellow light on the road. The road guide says "proceed with caution", but you should ALWAYS proceed with caution.
@@medexamtoolscom why would you be cautious when a teacher or professor is teaching you something? Also why would he go through all this trouble of studying and making the video as a "joke"
a little while ago there was a test showing that antimatter has the same light spectrum as matter... which means that we can't tell it's antimatter unless we get up close. does this mean it's possible that there are entire galaxies made of antimatter... maybe they didn't annihilate eachother at all
If what you say about it being undetectable is true then it could be a possible explanation. One problem could be that we should expect gamma ray emissions over the areas between matter/antimatter clusters. That is, assuming there is enough contact between matter from different galaxies in intergalactic space (IDK either way and IDK if it's known at all) to produce a detectable emission. My bet is that there is enough contact to generate observable rays, after all the energy released by the annihilation is equal to mc^2 by Einstein's famous equation, which is a lot for a little bit of matter. Or maybe the clusters are bigger than our observable universe, but in that case the practical observation that "the whole observable universe is made of matter" doesn't change, which would explain why it's mostly matter but it probably won't change anything else from current theories. In my opinion that's just too many assumptions so the current most supported hypotesis (whole observable universe is made of matter) was just accepted by Occam's razor.
the real problem would be that we could never go there and land on those antimatter planets, because well, we and our ship would POOF. kind of scary when you think about it.
no because there is not enough antimatter in the universe. and yes they annihilated each other because if they didn't you wouldn't be watching the video!
To the best of my knowledge, most physicists don't believe that antimatter is actually matter moving backwards in time. It's not even entirely clear what would it really mean to move backwards in time, from the popular viewpoint. If I'm remembering correctly, this idea all comes from a story that probably originated with Richard Feynman. At the time, one of the big puzzles of physics was why all instances of a particular elementary particle (all electrons, for example) are apparently identical. Feynman had a very hand-wavy idea that all electrons could in fact be the same electron, just bouncing back and forth between the beginning of time and the end. As far as I know, that idea never developed into anything mathematically grounded, but it did inspire Feynman and others to calculate what the properties of an electron moving backwards in time would be, in a certain precise sense that emerges from quantum field theory. What they came up with was a particle that matched the known properties of the positron. Just to give you a rough idea of what it means for a particle to "move backwards in time" in the technical sense: in quantum field theory, particles carry with them amounts of various conserved quantities as they move. These quantities may include energy, momentum, electric charge, "flavor," and others. As the particles move, these conserved quantities produce "currents," which have a direction based on the motion and sign of the conserved quantity. If you apply the time reversal operator (which is a purely mathematical concept, not something that actually reverses time), you reverse the direction of the current flow, which is equivalent to reversing the sign of the conserved quantity, thus (roughly speaking) turning the particle into its antiparticle. For example, consider electric current: it arises from the movement of electric charge, and the direction of the current is a product of the direction of motion of the charge and the sign of the charge. I⃗=qv⃗ I → = q v → Positive charge moving left (+q×−v + q × − v ) is equivalent to negative charge moving right (−q×+v − q × + v ). If you have a current of electrons moving to the right, and you apply the time reversal operator, it converts the rightward velocity to leftward velocity (−q×−v − q × − v ). But you would get the exact same result by instead converting the electrons into positrons and letting them continue to move to the right (+q×+v + q × + v ); either way, you wind up with the net positive charge flow moving to the right. By the way, optional reading if you're interested: there is a very basic (though hard to prove) theorem in quantum field theory, the TCP theorem, that says that if you apply the three operations of time reversal, charge conjugation (switch particles and antiparticles), and parity inversion (mirroring space), the result should be exactly equivalent to what you started with. We know from experimental data that, under certain exotic circumstances, the combination of charge conjugation and parity inversion does not leave all physical processes unchanged, which means that the same must be true of time reversal: physics is not time-reversal invariant. Of course, since we can't actually reverse time, we can't test in exactly what manner this is true.
The particle moving backward in time just arises because you can choose to have your minus sign on the time component of your anti-particle time-evolution instead of on the energy. It is mostly just stupid semantics and normally we view anti-particles as normal particles with negative energy so one might argue that it doesn't even make sense to put it there. But then again QFT is much more mature today, so it might have looked different back when Feynman looked at it.
Hi! I'm a retired professor. Nowadays I'm trying to reinvent myself and sharpen my knowledge. My profession is astronomy and space propulsion. I am constantly on the net learning. I have found Seeker to be an absolutely invaluable resource extremely correct and cutting-edge Technology. Keep up the great work.!!!
Even weirder: If you travel in a parallel universe were the big bang created everything out of antimatter. As soon you arrive there you would be aniallated
Even even wierder: What if the matter we live in is actually anti-matter and what we call anti-matter is matter? We just call the first one matter because it was the first to be discovered. This really do matters! lol =)
Antimatter actually explodes when made contact to matter creates a explosion that has 100% efficient explosion that is the most deadly weapon with the least amount of material.
can do alot more than that. but each negative atom only disipates one positively charged atom from what i hear. now if a tiny vial of it which is probably less than a hundred thousand atoms , costs about ~$3 billion, thats ~$3 billion for damage the size of a pencil. :l. just stab a pencil in the dirt. more damage done than antimatter and free.
Trap lord Banner wait a second, they say that empty space doesn't exist right? So this anti particle is floating inside a tridimensional space wich is our physical dimensions supposed to be made of something, this anti particle is floating in an empty space, otherwise if the space is not empty it should touch this antiparticle someway right? So if the empty space is not empty, our anti particle is floating in a space made of something that is not matter, otherwise it could not exist, so empty space is made of anti matter? No. made of matter? No. It is really empty or it is made of something that is not interacting with matter or anti matter? Dunno bro
Roy Devine as far as we know, "space" is space-time, antimatter doesn't really react with time (as far as we know) so you wouldn't get explosions in space. A fun fact is that space is millions of times emptier than our best vacuum (which is the LHG)
the warp drive i think needs "exotic" matter, which has a negative energy, rather than anti-matter which has a positive energy. no exotic matter is known, but negative energy vacuums can be created, some trick with the Casimir effect.
If antimatter gets rid of matter, then can't you logically use anti-matter, to modify molecules to cancel out specific molecules. So anti-matter is a molecular eraser technically.
GxCreed negative...anti matter is just the opposite but not quite. also coming, into contact with each other, they, for a better term, kill each other out. and leaving matter as it self. basically they are different but to an extent that they cant co-exist...
Symbian Casper sorry i phrased it wrong, but if they cancel each other out then what I'm saying is you can do something like take a antimatter version of hydrogen and take a matter version of H20 and pretty much cancel out the H and you get 2 oxygens. Its like adding a negative.
Blake Herrmann lol I am talking about a gun that can store antimatter just like they showed in the video and shoot it at matter to make it disappear. Get a life and some imagination. Douchebag.
Naif Shaikh I have one. enough to know that in order for that to be remotely possible the number of antimatter atoms in the universe would have to be greater than the number of normal matter. thus the normal matter would dissipate leaving traces of antimatter and in turn converting the multi verse into a antimatter universe. then maybe we may come back again. but for that to be possible the entire multiverse would need to be destroyed
1:26 Wait, if matter & antimatter is equal, should all matter be annihilated? But matter still exist, so there are maybe two reasons; whether matter is way more than antimatter OR unknown amount of antimatter is contained inside a bubble of energy somewhere in the universe.
The video literally talked about this. Antimatter is long gone due to annihilation in the first half after big bang. matter still remains as it was larger in number.
I have question. Would antimatter annihilate when coming into contact with neutrons? Because from what i understand when it comes into contact with the opposite charge it explodes, and if neutrons are neutral couldn't you store it with a bunch of neutrons theoretically?
@@chetanraikwal5766 and that is only 1 of the problems with the theory. Another is why have we not found any natural "explosions" of energy when they collide.
@@Strangeship1997 okay but can we observe those natural explosions they may take place extremely far away.... Or what if there is some kind of barrier between matter and anti-matter in space so they actually never collide?
Kind of, just not in the way science thinks about it. The great scientists think there is extra matter in amongst the regular matter. But the Antimatter is hanging out in the voids of space, not amongst the regular matter. Antimatter is dark matter, dark matter causes positive curvature of spacetime, increases time dialation and in effect... antigravity, antigravity or (dark energy) stops the universe from collapsing in itself. Antigravity = Dark Energy = Lambda(cosmological -G) = Antimatter density. Physics is fixed.
Levy Willian Oliveira Antimatter creates massive amounts of energy when it touches matter,which is basicly a nuclear bomb,but without any radiation. But take your bow against an antimatter bomb,I wonder who will win ;)
Wasnt it like 1 matter nd antimatter collided during the big bang to give out so much energy, if one antimatter touches the radioactive waste, we could possibly be doing another big bang, which could possibly go on to squash everything in existence? Bcos of production of another chain of explosions
"There should be equal amounts of matter and antimatter. There isn't because the antimatter was all destroyed by matter. We don't know why the universe has more matter than antimatter." I understood the idea that was supposed to be communicated here, but only after pausing the video. This part of the script was desperately in need of revision.
the question you should now ask is: Is there room at all to give matter a place as existence? Before the universe could exist, it is plausible that there was nothing at all, not even space to create anything. So space is a requirement to create anything for the purpose of existence, from this you can understand that the opposite is needed of matter to create an existence where it is not possible but, anti matter makes it possible, so anti matter is needed to give matter an existence, in this case a universe filled with matter. the operation of a UFO says a lot about the universe, a UFO has an anti-matter generator on board and makes a field around the entire object, partly because of this, there is a negative field (driven by anti matter) around the UFO this has the goal of not being physically present and present at the same time, (just like the universe) Partly because of this, high speed travel is possible and no G forces are experienced.
I don't think all antimatter disappeared in the beginning, all we know is that stuff around us is made of matter, there could be entire Galaxies made of antimatter somewhere. just a thought.
Consider a galaxy made of antimatter. Now it would interact like regular matter and thus be attracted to other matter, and if two galaxies ran into eachother or just any other form of regular matter, then there would be tremendous amounts of energy and gamma rays released from the humongous amounts annihilations. One planet made of gamma rays reacting with another would most definitely be detected, however we have never detected such things. this it's very improbable that there are large masses of anti matter in the universe, even if possible.
Josua Thurnheer on top of that antimatter super Novea would not produce neutrinos that we can detect, they would produce other cocktails of particles that we can detect, that have never been detected.
I mean, I think, most of the antimatter particles would be annihilated by common matter if they come near enough our sphere of normal matter. but the tough that somewhere in the universe could be a cloud of galaxies made of antimatter, only thing we would see is the light or not even that if its behind the observable wall.
If the galaxies collide with common matter, then sure, but like our near galaxy group it could be isolated from other galaxies. we are only possible to collide with a few galaxies the other will vanish due space inflation. If in the beginning most matter collided with antimatter i would not be surprised if some matter and antimatter separated in pockets of their own kind.
Satoshi Nakamoto an antimatter bullet isn’t to unreasonable. I saw a RUclips video about antimatter, and they were talking about rocket launches fueled by it and stuff like that, and one of the things was a bullet and I can’t remember the exact number, but they said they’d put an extremely small amount of antimatter on the bullet tip or something like that. There was more to it but I honestly can’t remember so I didn’t help much but yeah
5:22 _"Making Anti-matter takes billion times more energy than what we get from the annihilation."_ *Where Does The Rest Of The Energy Go? Does It Change Into Some Different Form Of Energy ?*
Most of the energy used to produce anti matter is just magnetism and force. Force gets absorbed by surrounding matter and magnetism gets cancelled out from Earths magnetic field
@@keaganl3348 No it could not be both as -2^2 is the same as 0 - 2^2, which would equal -4 following BEDMAS (PEDMAS). The bracket is necessary in order to make it (-2)^2 = 4.
Do you know that 0 is not written before negative numbers but it is actually there? well, the same goes for parentheses outside negative numbers. You dont have to write them, but they are inferred. So -2^2 is the same as (-2)^2 the same way (-2)^2 is = (0-2)^2.
its not made out of nothing... well thats what we predict sorry i meant they are made out of different charges of quarks...but thats allwe think its made out of...
Probably, but it costs a TON of money even to make antihelium, and I'm unsure if we've even made antilithium yet. Even if someone DOES find out a way to make antimatter as complex as a transition metal, the cost of creating it would outweigh the cost of selling it, and I'm not even taking into consideration the cost of *containing the stuff. *The entire reason metals like gold and silver are worth so much is because they don't corrode or tarnish, antimatter is essentially the opposite.
This is the kind of interesting subjects schools should teach. Everything else they teach has nothing to do with what we will do in life but still this is cool.
Bryan G Beyond human comprehension. We dont even possess enough brain power to understand something like that but on the other hand anything is possible through God
Might be neutrinoless double-beta decay. "Normally, some radioactive atoms' unstable nuclei will lose a neutron via beta decay - the neutron transforms into a proton by releasing an electron and a tiny particle called an electron antineutrino. A mirror image can also occur, in which a proton turns into a neutron, releasing a positron and an electron neutrino - the normal-matter counterpart to the antineutrino. Double-beta decay happens when two electrons and two antineutrinos (the antimatter counterparts of neutrinos) are released: basically, the beta decay happens twice. Scientists have long theorized a neutrinoless version of this process - something that would suggest that the two neutrinos annihilated each other before being released from the atom. Essentially, the neutrino behaves as its own antimatter sibling. (Particles of matter that are their own antiparticles are called Majorana fermions, after the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana, who hypothesized their existence in 1937.) If neutrinos and antineutrinos behave differently from each other, that could help to explain *how* all matter wasn't annihilated at the instant the universe formed."
ThePresident Gaming Can this God supposedly do logically impossible things (like create an actual perfect circle, a circle with an infinite radius, a circle with four corners, or a colorless blue married bachelor) Or... Does anything this God somehow creates end up being conveniently, logically possible?
Technicaly its believed, that the lorenz-force would be inverted in an antimatter universe. So it wouldnt be entirely the same if everything was made out of antimatter.
Wrong. The lorenz-force would be in the opposite direction for an opposite charge and the SAME magnetic field, indeed, but you're not thinking far enough..... because what generated that magnetic field? If it's the same scenario, it would have been caused by opposite electric charges and thus the magnetic field lines would point in the opposite direction, so actually the lorenz force would be the same after all.
What if antimatter could be used to break through anything. Since both matter and antimatter annihilate then if you have enough you could get through something
Max Johnson Even though I'm a natural science student that looked odd for me thankfuly for the reply section I found the problem but hey, Max,let me make you happy here "(-2)^2= +4"
Great video! I think it’s quite possible for us to use the explosion of antimatter and regular matter to power our spacecrafts to reach further places, planets, etc. it’s definitely not going to be easy, and it may take longer than we would expect..but to just say it’s absolutely impossible? Nah, there’s a way that this can work.
It's just my concept, please correct me if I'm thinking in a wrong way. Let us say that all the positive numbers represent matter and negative numbers represent anti matter. Let us take number two for example. Now, (2)+(-2)=0 that means when matter collides with antimatter, things get into null. Now, 2*2=4, a positive number, so the consequence is a matter. Now, (-2)*(-2)=4, even though (-2) is antimatter, the consequence of (-2)*(-2) is a matter but there is one mystery again in this concept, if this (-2)*(-2)=4 concept works that means, every single time this antimatter is getting added up in this multiplication it is converted into matter, so, how exactly it's getting converted back into matter while interacting with other antimatter in a certain way is still a mystery. I just wonder, if there is any thing that resembles the properties of number 1.
Wee need to weaponize it. To have the most spectacular distraction possible. Can you imagine shooting someone not with regular old bullets but with anti-mater.
Mike Karapetyan Also, the bullet would annihilate with the gun you were carrying it in, killing you and possibly everyone around as well. Awesome maybe. Effective? No.
It wouldn't work. If you shot an anti-matter bullet, it would just crash into the air in our atmosphere and POOF it's gone. Plus, you couldn't use gun powder, you'd need a magnet coil gun, which haven't been invented to be practical.
nielson jack It would be very destructive. Every particle in that antimatter stream would turn into pure energy as soon as it met its antiparticle. A 'large ray' would produce a devastating explosion. It might not even reach the object you shot it at though because it would react with the air. However, the resulting blast would most certainly destroy the object. And the weapon. And you. And pretty much everything else in sight.
Hang on,”matter +antimatter =Energy ”,right? Then,”E=mc2”means that after the Big Bang,matter and antimatter disappeared Into energy,energy became matter!
The sum of Energy in the universe is in no way 0. The sum of momentum and angular momentum are 0, for, hopefully, obvious reasons. But you can't sum energy to 0, as it can only be positive, unless you literally set your zero point to be the summed energy of the universe, but that's not at all meaningful.
Potential energy is not a meaningful single quantity, and can be made positive or negative depending on where we choose to arbitrarily set our zero. So, trying to claim that is somehow always sums to zero when taken with internal and kinetic energies, makes no sense, as, we can always choose our zero point to make it sum to whatever we please. For instance, when calculating gravitational potential, we often choose our zero to be at infinity, but we can just as 'correctly' say that our zero is at the centre of a planet. This is basically the arbitrary constant of integration being freely choose-able. Dark energy just isn't a kind of quantity that makes sense to be "added" to say, kinetic energy. That's like trying to add an amount of potatoes to an electric field strength. In general, energy is only meaningful in changes. In fact, since we require Omega to be 1 for a flat universe, it is necessary that the mass-energy contribution is equal to the critical density, and therefor NOT zero. What you're talking about is a hypothesis called the Zero-Energy Universe, which, is indeed, hypothesised for a flat universe, but it takes matter as positive energy and gravity as negative energy, provided that we set zero at infinity, and has exactly nothing to do with "Energy" in the conventional sense. It could be a good idea to read the things you post.
You can just simply not say that if a system consists of a pulley, a spring and 2 blocks the force won't be 3ma. It'd be 2ma + kx Not all forces are equal and same goes for energy As of the processes go ∆E=0 for internal processes under certain conditions Like the temperature should be constant, but the temperature during big bang was in no way constant Other factors too are considered
lolzomgz1337 Yeah some energies are referencial energies. U say U=Mgh with respect to ground or kq1q2/r² with respect to distance so here we speak with respect to something so £E cannot be zero
Very good episode, to tell you the true before I saw this video I thought that we could use antimater for space travel (thank you STAR TREK for lying to me)
Technically the energy released from the Annihilation of matter meeting anti matter is so efficient it would be exponentially better than using fission or fusion energy to power a starship, although the lack of other properties limits it to that role (And the creation and stockpiling of Anti matter to use is a whole other issue altogether)
You really believe what a Sci-fi franchise says? I mean, yeah, Star Trek is a Medium (Semi-Realistic) Sci-Fi Franchise and makes more sense then Star Wars but still
If you assume that star trek used the space bubble to go faster than light then then mount of energy you need amounts to fucking massive amount of matter and anti matter. Like solar systems worth.
1:25 I've always wondered how we are sure all the antimatter combined. What if with all that energy a ton of matter shot one way and a ton of antimatter shot the other?
It’s possible. There are telescopes being made to see if they can detect the gamma radiation from the boundaries between matter and antimatter galaxies
And, just to paint the whole picture, you could run two gamma rays into each other and create a matter-antimatter pair, so it works both ways to meet the law of conservation of energy
10 nanograms = 4 hours of light??? I understand the immense energy that went into creating it, but this just sounds amazing. If we were to discover some way to create anti matter efficiently, it could power things really efficiently!
The Ghostbusters had proton packs on their backs. "Each one of us is wearing an unlicensed nuclear accelerator on his back... Switch me on"... (Stands back about a foot lol)
I think it's pretty clearly possible that there's some significant difference, we just haven't isolated it/discovered what it is yet. There's a reason for our universe's matter/antimatter disparity, and it could be that something about it becomes unstable at a certain point.
Dude, your videos are top notch, but get someone to cut your hair properly. You might be going for that dictator-remembered in history kind of look but man... Peace
Antimatter is oh most definitely real. It is actually produce in thunderbolts, and can be detected. Only a few atoms are produced and blow up as little sparks in the atmosphere. Many escape the atmosphere due to there shear smallness and fly off into space. Antimatter can be used for space travel, but must be used cautiously.
My theory is that there is another part of the universe, isolated from our observable one, made out of antimatter. Half and half, whole galaxies, whatever. They cant touch or interact so they would be like bubbles.
Experience We know this isn’t true, the Big Bang contained anti matter and matter but there was a little more matter than anti matter that now composed the universe.
well every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so i dont think there would be any difference in amount of matter/antimatter. i think those rules would apply. idk, just my theory ;)
While you are correct with "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" another universe with antimatter COULD'VE existed, but sadly only for a few seconds before matter wiped it out, and your "Bubble" theory is a rather interesting one, however it just (sadly) can't, in any way, be true, and I will explain why. It couldn't work because what your saying is that there are borders to universes, each with different physics and all that, but your also saying that these borders have either, A. No physics and it's just an extremely weird area between them, one that we can't even describe using words or pictures or anything. or B. They are pretty much black holes that would warp our bodies until we died, or just died once we touched the area around there. And the more likely one would be A. if I'm being completely honest, and the reason for that is there are areas on EARTH that have different areas of gravity, like it's heavier in some areas and lighter in others, and this points toward that our universe is like this, as In imagine the gravity being physics, so in some areas it would have less physics and in others it would have heavier physics (Ex: Heavier physics would mean we wouldn't be able to have planes because the simple laws of physics would be enforced upon any living thing in that area to the extreme, possibly killing some. And Lighter physics would mean not only could planes fly with ease, but humans could jump higher and possibly be able to breathe for small amounts of time in space) And as for USS Gerald R. Ford 12th CSG's response: We actually know nothing about the Big Bang, except that it DID happen, and that it MIGHT close on itself and then loop back and create itself again. And antimatter could actually support an entire universe, like if we found the secret to antimatter, we could fit types of hazmat suits to make it so that it would allow us to go into anti matter areas, and there actually is still some antimatter in the universe, and they ARE in our observable universe. I know this is like a huge essay on antimatter and matter but hey, now you get a free essay y'know? if you ever need it I guess... If you liked this stuff though I'd love it if you subbed so I could get my scientific part of my channel running, and yes, I know a guy named "BUTTFACE GAMER" doesn't seem like a science nerd but I know quite a lot so yeah. If you made it this far have a great day! :D
this is actually really weird though... we still don't know what was there in universe before big bang theory... was there nothing? just nothing? but nothing isn't even possible... also, if there was nothing and how did that explosion in big bang theory occur? seriously these are some really tough questions...
BUTTFACE GAMER We don’t know if the big bang occurred or not. All we have to go off of to prove the big bang is certain mathematical formulas, specific concepts, and the cosmic background radiation inhabiting the universe. Honestly you’d have better luck proving the existence of Atlantis than the big bang.
2 minutes into this Video & I have Learned MORE than watching the previous video i watched titled why Anti matter is 27 Trillion Dollars a Gram, by the physics Girl
Well, the "square root of the Klein-Gordon equation" nature of the Dirac equation pretty much comes down to exactly that. I'm not sure what he said that made you cringe.
Jold The Klien-Gordon equation comes from the relativistic pythagorean theorem E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2 , but with substitution of the momentum and the energy operators in for their respective scalars (e.g. p=h/(2i*pi)d/dx). You're not really saying anything by bring up the Klien-Gordon equation... Even still Dirac attributed the negative energy solution of the original equation to antimatter.
marcusrayrosales1 _"The Klien-Gordon equation comes from the relativistic pythagorean theorem E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2 , but with substitution of the momentum and the energy operators in for their respective scalars (e.g. p=h/(2i*pi)d/dx)."_ Yes, I know that. The Dirac equation is essentially using a sqrt(E^2) operator. _"You're not really saying anything by bring up the Klien-Gordon equation..."_ I'm saying that the Dirac equation is the square root of the Klein-Gordon equation. I said exactly what I meant. "Even still Dirac attributed the negative energy solution of the original equation to antimatter." Yes, exactly. The fact that there are negative solutions is due to the form of the equation, and is essentially the property that O(E)=E^2 has two solutions for E, one positive and one negative. That's what the guy in the video said, and that's what I said.
So, an antimatter bomb would basically be the ultimate weapon? Since it would react with anything. The bomb would basically (probably) be a magnetic field well and upon the shell breaking, the antimatter inside would react with everything, releasing the energy according e=mc2?
DoCtorDestiny Hd my thoughts exactly. its more like a different dimension. a mirror image. another thing if hydrogen and antihydrogen are mirror images of eachother so is there an antimatter earth in earth already. that would probably explain supernatural cases with spirits wandering. a soul/spirit , off one of my theory is antimatter. another is antimatter is alternate of everything. as mentioned in this video about a antimatter table would probably exist. the biggest questions I came up with: what if you were able to touch an antimatter table? we are of matter, correct? the table wouldn't explode. it would just disappears from us? where would it go? maybe somewhere it can exist between space and time but with other antimatter. or maybe it stays there because they aren't identical mirror images. so let's put two tables identical but mirrored. antimatter and matter? which one will disappear? it will depend on what world does it exist within. this is another matter earth. matter is every where her. antimatter table must go. the analihation process sends it to antimatter earth that's within earth or to a different dimensionsal antimatter earth somewhere else? I recall reading strange things from scientists, theoried about differences between parallel earths, alternate reality earth and now dimensional earths. so I put my thoughts to these theories. oh so these multiple earths have matter versions " parallel earths" to antimatter versions mirrored earths, within each other. spiritual earths, "alternate reality earths" and dimensional earths in different locations. i have a strong feeling that the "analihation" process does more than what we know so far. maybe cern opens both spiritual earth and the antimatter earth within this earth " alternate reality mirrored " earth. ever read about how decisions would play a role for these earths?
Well the whole point of Annihilation is that it cancels out not just antimatter, but also our matter. So if you, say, touched that antimatter table, both your matter and whatever antimatter you touch would be instantaneously gone. I assume it is all converted to gamma radiation since matter can be converted to energy directly. The point is, if you touched that table, only the parts of either you or the table that came in contact would be Annihilated. So basically, you'd lose a bit of finger and the table would lose a bit of its smooth surface. Considering putting two identical, but opposite matter objects together, there is no "which would disappear" because, quite simply, both tables would be converted to gamma radiation. The whole idea that antimatter has formed an alternate dimension is an interesting and maybe possible idea even though no known science can currently support it. I for one don't believe it would be possible because, as said, antimatter was in theory completely annihilated by contact with matter throughout the new universe and therefore does not exist outside of earth's labs. Spirits and alternate realities are just stories made up to give meaning to death as well. If an alternate antimatter dimension existed, there would be no parallel between the worlds. Simply put, they would live completely separate from us. No contact whatsoever. If there were, both parallel universes would annihilate and we'd all be converted to theoretical nothingness, along with the rest of our universe if both are identical. Of course, I'm certainly no genius and there definitely isn't any known science to support anything I've said about alternate dimensions, but I stand by my word.
Sanus Chaus true but these were about particles. so what about With possible other things like the so called table. when i brought up analihation was with these other things like the antimatter table. about the spiritual side of it. electro magnetic waves do attract ghosts or things like that. just like it did with antihydrogen. these is still no prove of these different earths or anything of course. if there was, what i said would be "some" explanation to it.
If 1 gram of matter and 1 gram of anti-matter would touch it would create an explosion greater than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. So at the big bang these massive amount of mass which are both made of matter and anti-matter would fly into eachother and if they would be the same size as earth ( which is EXTREMELY small ) they would weigh approximately 6,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000 (6 x 1024) kilograms. And 1000 times that for milligrams. So think of an explosion that many times greater than the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb combined and which is incredibly small. Big bang was some fireworks but explosions that were probably 6,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000... [endless] times larger than a nuke. Mind officially blown.
Leon Barnett black hokes are formed when a star dies. All the gravity and mass gets compressed into a single point. Thats why black holes have such immense gravity
0:29 ... slightly incorrect. It was the Dirac Equation, not x^2. I get it was a a reference to how the equation has a symmetry, but anyone who doesn't know this will assume x^2 = 2 was the equation that changed everything.
Somewhere in a parallel universe: What's the anti-matter with you?
meanwhile, linkin park song lyric in the parallel universe. "it doesn't even anti-matter how hard you try"
The Rock raises his one eyebrow & proclaims....
"It Matters!" 😆
THE ANTI FORCE IS WITH YOU lol
Freddie Mercury: Nothing really anti-matters to meeeeeeee
See this inspiring video of our future of country ruclips.net/video/G_0cnKxpAxM/видео.html
We need to start calling anti-protons negatrons
They would most likely be called controns or antrons. Pros and cons?
I had the exact same thought, Orlando. Enough with this inconsistent naming bullshit.
Orlando Saldaña Ramírez Megatron 😏
they actually do! it's less common though
that is _pro_ not _pos_. con is the opposite of pro
Finally I can have negative 3 apples
Comment
wat
ShadowMaster 45 gold
The entire planet won't have enough money to buy those apples from you
Little Big thanks for ruining it mr know it all
I’m skeptical because this was posted on April 1st.
Never noticed that
Damn..
You should be skeptical 100% of the time. It's like a flashing yellow light on the road. The road guide says "proceed with caution", but you should ALWAYS proceed with caution.
@@medexamtoolscom why would you be cautious when a teacher or professor is teaching you something? Also why would he go through all this trouble of studying and making the video as a "joke"
This is why april fools shouldn't exist
a little while ago there was a test showing that antimatter has the same light spectrum as matter... which means that we can't tell it's antimatter unless we get up close. does this mean it's possible that there are entire galaxies made of antimatter... maybe they didn't annihilate eachother at all
If what you say about it being undetectable is true then it could be a possible explanation.
One problem could be that we should expect gamma ray emissions over the areas between matter/antimatter clusters. That is, assuming there is enough contact between matter from different galaxies in intergalactic space (IDK either way and IDK if it's known at all) to produce a detectable emission. My bet is that there is enough contact to generate observable rays, after all the energy released by the annihilation is equal to mc^2 by Einstein's famous equation, which is a lot for a little bit of matter.
Or maybe the clusters are bigger than our observable universe, but in that case the practical observation that "the whole observable universe is made of matter" doesn't change, which would explain why it's mostly matter but it probably won't change anything else from current theories.
In my opinion that's just too many assumptions so the current most supported hypotesis (whole observable universe is made of matter) was just accepted by Occam's razor.
the real problem would be that we could never go there and land on those antimatter planets, because well, we and our ship would POOF. kind of scary when you think about it.
no because there is not enough antimatter in the universe. and yes they annihilated each other because if they didn't you wouldn't be watching the video!
Just think about an antimatter asteroid... Or antimatter used as weapons.
They do annihalite.
*this is the secret behind the snap of thanos*
ok
*ILLUMINATI WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*
Thanos just creates half of the universe but using atnti matter
y'all kids need to leave please... unless you learn something
@@-.-4827 you need to leave aswell, learn what a joke is.
To the best of my knowledge, most physicists don't believe that antimatter is actually matter moving backwards in time. It's not even entirely clear what would it really mean to move backwards in time, from the popular viewpoint.
If I'm remembering correctly, this idea all comes from a story that probably originated with Richard Feynman. At the time, one of the big puzzles of physics was why all instances of a particular elementary particle (all electrons, for example) are apparently identical. Feynman had a very hand-wavy idea that all electrons could in fact be the same electron, just bouncing back and forth between the beginning of time and the end. As far as I know, that idea never developed into anything mathematically grounded, but it did inspire Feynman and others to calculate what the properties of an electron moving backwards in time would be, in a certain precise sense that emerges from quantum field theory. What they came up with was a particle that matched the known properties of the positron.
Just to give you a rough idea of what it means for a particle to "move backwards in time" in the technical sense: in quantum field theory, particles carry with them amounts of various conserved quantities as they move. These quantities may include energy, momentum, electric charge, "flavor," and others. As the particles move, these conserved quantities produce "currents," which have a direction based on the motion and sign of the conserved quantity. If you apply the time reversal operator (which is a purely mathematical concept, not something that actually reverses time), you reverse the direction of the current flow, which is equivalent to reversing the sign of the conserved quantity, thus (roughly speaking) turning the particle into its antiparticle.
For example, consider electric current: it arises from the movement of electric charge, and the direction of the current is a product of the direction of motion of the charge and the sign of the charge.
I⃗=qv⃗
I
→
=
q
v
→
Positive charge moving left (+q×−v
+
q
×
−
v
) is equivalent to negative charge moving right (−q×+v
−
q
×
+
v
). If you have a current of electrons moving to the right, and you apply the time reversal operator, it converts the rightward velocity to leftward velocity (−q×−v
−
q
×
−
v
). But you would get the exact same result by instead converting the electrons into positrons and letting them continue to move to the right (+q×+v
+
q
×
+
v
); either way, you wind up with the net positive charge flow moving to the right.
By the way, optional reading if you're interested: there is a very basic (though hard to prove) theorem in quantum field theory, the TCP theorem, that says that if you apply the three operations of time reversal, charge conjugation (switch particles and antiparticles), and parity inversion (mirroring space), the result should be exactly equivalent to what you started with. We know from experimental data that, under certain exotic circumstances, the combination of charge conjugation and parity inversion does not leave all physical processes unchanged, which means that the same must be true of time reversal: physics is not time-reversal invariant. Of course, since we can't actually reverse time, we can't test in exactly what manner this is true.
english please
Even tho I did not finish reading your statement you deserve a like on how long you took typing that statement.
That's actually really interesting🤔
You fucking wrote an entire essay.
The particle moving backward in time just arises because you can choose to have your minus sign on the time component of your anti-particle time-evolution instead of on the energy. It is mostly just stupid semantics and normally we view anti-particles as normal particles with negative energy so one might argue that it doesn't even make sense to put it there.
But then again QFT is much more mature today, so it might have looked different back when Feynman looked at it.
Hi! I'm a retired professor. Nowadays I'm trying to reinvent myself and sharpen my knowledge. My profession is astronomy and space propulsion. I am constantly on the net learning. I have found Seeker to be an absolutely invaluable resource extremely correct and cutting-edge Technology. Keep up the great work.!!!
Get a PET scan...."Positron Emission Tomography"....Positrons are antimatter.
Can you share references, i m an research scholar from India.
If I may, what did you teach? Sorry, I can't make it stop saying that name... Something to do with linked business use. I'm Jack.
Even weirder: If you travel in a parallel universe were the big bang created everything out of antimatter. As soon you arrive there you would be aniallated
unless you end up in the vacuum of space
The "vacuum" of space is not empty. You would be gradually be "eaten up", atom by atom.
NTT of Mistery the "vacuum" of space is actually 10 atom per 1 cubic centimeter.
Even even wierder: What if the matter we live in is actually anti-matter and what we call anti-matter is matter?
We just call the first one matter because it was the first to be discovered.
This really do matters! lol =)
Peter Binder sorry I'm not science guy, but, if a man went to a parallel universe made out of antimatter, how big would the explosion be?
Antimatter actually explodes when made contact to matter creates a explosion that has 100% efficient explosion that is the most deadly weapon with the least amount of material.
can do alot more than that. but each negative atom only disipates one positively charged atom from what i hear. now if a tiny vial of it which is probably less than a hundred thousand atoms , costs about ~$3 billion, thats ~$3 billion for damage the size of a pencil. :l. just stab a pencil in the dirt. more damage done than antimatter and free.
The energy efficiency of the reaction might be extremely... efficient, but lighting up a tip of gunpowder won't give you satisfying bang either.
:(
Didnt know a hotdog could contain this much knowledge
Trap lord Banner wait a second, they say that empty space doesn't exist right? So this anti particle is floating inside a tridimensional space wich is our physical dimensions supposed to be made of something, this anti particle is floating in an empty space, otherwise if the space is not empty it should touch this antiparticle someway right? So if the empty space is not empty, our anti particle is floating in a space made of something that is not matter, otherwise it could not exist, so empty space is made of anti matter? No.
made of matter? No.
It is really empty or it is made of something that is not interacting with matter or anti matter? Dunno bro
Roy Devine as far as we know, "space" is space-time, antimatter doesn't really react with time (as far as we know) so you wouldn't get explosions in space. A fun fact is that space is millions of times emptier than our best vacuum (which is the LHG)
1 gram is 100 trillion dollars.Bruh.
Federal Bureau of Investigation 15 billion*
25 billion*
100 Million**
Idiots he is right watch the vid
4$*
*Plottwist: We are actually in a antimatter universe and the “anti mater” is actually matter*
Maybe that's why we depreciate over time...
i mean to an anti-matter universe we are anti-matter and they are just matter
It depends on what you call it
If I call electron a positive charge
I will call proton a negative charge
he says that at 3:52
paradox
So antimatter really doesn't matter haha
Mikko AUF I HATE YOU 😂😂😂😂
Mikko AUF that's mean to antimatter :'(
Darth Nox >;)
But it does matter! it's the only chance for FTL travel!
the warp drive i think needs "exotic" matter, which has a negative energy, rather than anti-matter which has a positive energy. no exotic matter is known, but negative energy vacuums can be created, some trick with the Casimir effect.
More research is needed for an appropriate comment
The comment section”s knowledge is over 9000.
J&JTwins Reviews&Tutorials fr these people act like they know everything about this subject 😂
Its anti 9000
9000 What?.., apples,peers or what???
@@martinwirts9077 powerlevel
Or perhaps it is under -9000.
If our universe is made up of matter then there should be a universe made up of antimatter as you said everything has polarity
We could never meet it because we'd both be erased.
So gravity has a polar.. and dark light is a thing then? Maby anti-time is bought in a universe for anti-dark-energi. I might need an Oscar now.. thx
@@stiffusan6911 didn't get it😑😑😑
Gamerax Gaming spirit world. they are effecting what should not be effected
YES YES YES Antimatter in an Antiuniverse moving in anti time, so it never meets matter.
Electrons: light and negative
Positrons: light and positive
Megatrons: light and positively negative
If antimatter gets rid of matter, then can't you logically use anti-matter, to modify molecules to cancel out specific molecules. So anti-matter is a molecular eraser technically.
GxCreed negative...anti matter is just the opposite but not quite. also coming, into contact with each other, they, for a better term, kill each other out. and leaving matter as it self. basically they are different but to an extent that they cant co-exist...
No. An anti-matter mocule does not have to be the same as a matter-molecule for them to cancel each other out.
GxCreed it creates an explosion
Would that be a gamma explosion? We could totally build an army of Hulks. :-D
Symbian Casper sorry i phrased it wrong, but if they cancel each other out then what I'm saying is you can do something like take a antimatter version of hydrogen and take a matter version of H20 and pretty much cancel out the H and you get 2 oxygens. Its like adding a negative.
Anti-matter is basically just the worlds most efficient battery
Not true
That profile picture tho it's saids it all
@@alial-jabur6453 I was going to spiel on about how correct this guys statement was but you pretty much covered it all in two words! Well said!
Matter too
Ali Al-Jabur very true
My bank account balance is negative, so here is the proof of anti-matter.
Wow. Imagine an Anti-Matter Gun
Naif Shaikh did you watch the video? it would disappear and it's anti charged hydrogen. hydrogen's a gas ya dip shit
Blake Herrmann lol I am talking about a gun that can store antimatter just like they showed in the video and shoot it at matter to make it disappear. Get a life and some imagination. Douchebag.
Naif Shaikh I have one. enough to know that in order for that to be remotely possible the number of antimatter atoms in the universe would have to be greater than the number of normal matter. thus the normal matter would dissipate leaving traces of antimatter and in turn converting the multi verse into a antimatter universe. then maybe we may come back again. but for that to be possible the entire multiverse would need to be destroyed
and obviously we wouldn't be us. I'm talking about a humanoid sentient lifeform composed of antimatter.
I may be a douche bag, but hey, atleast I'm not dumb.
1:57 I keep hearing *hentai matter"
Lol 😂
@@imjkbro7573 now I hear it too
Hentai lifes matter!
Antimatter is doppleganger.. If the twin meet, they will disappear...
but they CANT..THEMATRIX HAS THEM!!!
RUclips: recommending me about anti matter at 3am
Me:what is the antimatter with you?
1:26 Wait, if matter & antimatter is equal, should all matter be annihilated? But matter still exist, so there are maybe two reasons; whether matter is way more than antimatter OR unknown amount of antimatter is contained inside a bubble of energy somewhere in the universe.
What if they flew oposite direction,...?
They both advance and whoever got further stays alive
Ryunaga Arafat some what true
@ryuanga In the LHC, matter and antimatter do not touch due to antimatter’s unique magnetic properties.
The video literally talked about this. Antimatter is long gone due to annihilation in the first half after big bang. matter still remains as it was larger in number.
The kids in africa aren't starving after all, they got dem antifoods
Hahahaah
3dank5me
@Adolf Hitler you're the legend
Wowwwwwwwwww rude, I visited Africa and Dem peeps are all in da hospital.......
@@redpandagaming1964 it's a joke
I have question. Would antimatter annihilate when coming into contact with neutrons? Because from what i understand when it comes into contact with the opposite charge it explodes, and if neutrons are neutral couldn't you store it with a bunch of neutrons theoretically?
It only annihilates when it comes into contact with its own anti-matter partner. So an antimatter neutrino can annihilate a normal neutrino.
@@sumsar01 really aren't the both neutrons the same if not why?
@@chetanraikwal5766 and that is only 1 of the problems with the theory. Another is why have we not found any natural "explosions" of energy when they collide.
@@Strangeship1997 okay but can we observe those natural explosions they may take place extremely far away.... Or what if there is some kind of barrier between matter and anti-matter in space so they actually never collide?
@@sumsar01 neutrons will not annihilate.because neutrons are chargeless☺☺
I thought dark matter n antimatter were the same thing, man I’m such a casual
Kind of, just not in the way science thinks about it. The great scientists think there is extra matter in amongst the regular matter. But the Antimatter is hanging out in the voids of space, not amongst the regular matter. Antimatter is dark matter, dark matter causes positive curvature of spacetime, increases time dialation and in effect... antigravity, antigravity or (dark energy) stops the universe from collapsing in itself. Antigravity = Dark Energy = Lambda(cosmological -G) = Antimatter density.
Physics is fixed.
Bruh
I see a new mass destruction weapon here....
Or a exploration ship for space.
its mass self destruction weapon. Because if you shoot the anit matter will instant get contakt with the air and POW youre dead
Mr Sneaky spend a lot of energy just to create a weapon made of antimatter, I'd rather use a bow
Levy Willian Oliveira Antimatter creates massive amounts of energy when it touches matter,which is basicly a nuclear bomb,but without any radiation. But take your bow against an antimatter bomb,I wonder who will win ;)
without any radiation? i thought he said it shot a few gamma radiation @5:05 man.
3:45 got me thinking deep, about our universe and all, ya know? Then at 5:00 I'm brought right back to my comedic reality.
we could use antimatter to dispose of radioactive waste
you'd need a ton of antimatter and you'd have to bring the nuclear waste to the lhc, not the other way around.
It sounds expensive, but if they're not proposing to bury the stuff in my yard... I'm okay with that. :o)
If you could create so much antimatter in the first place, then you wouldn't need to use any fission at all.
1 gram of antimatter can destroy all of New York so...Think again
Wasnt it like 1 matter nd antimatter collided during the big bang to give out so much energy, if one antimatter touches the radioactive waste, we could possibly be doing another big bang, which could possibly go on to squash everything in existence? Bcos of production of another chain of explosions
"There should be equal amounts of matter and antimatter. There isn't because the antimatter was all destroyed by matter. We don't know why the universe has more matter than antimatter."
I understood the idea that was supposed to be communicated here, but only after pausing the video. This part of the script was desperately in need of revision.
the question you should now ask is:
Is there room at all to give matter a place as existence?
Before the universe could exist, it is plausible that there was nothing at all, not even space to create anything.
So space is a requirement to create anything for the purpose of existence,
from this you can understand that the opposite is needed of matter to create an existence where it is not possible but,
anti matter makes it possible,
so anti matter is needed to give matter an existence,
in this case a universe filled with matter.
the operation of a UFO says a lot about the universe,
a UFO has an anti-matter generator on board and makes a field around the entire object,
partly because of this, there is a negative field (driven by anti matter) around the UFO
this has the goal of not being physically present and present at the same time,
(just like the universe)
Partly because of this,
high speed travel is possible and no G forces are experienced.
jay lorenz there are a lot of unwarranted assumptions and odd conclusions in this line of thinking.
Whats the matter with you?
AYYYYYYYYYY *BADUM TSSSS*
Solid lol
Antimatter happened!!
It doesn't matter
Matter of fact, I'm fine
Do you have footage from the matter and antimatter coliding instead of animated ?? would be cool to see that
i mean if u can see gamma rays sure
they can only create antimatter molecules for now
DarrenGaming you can't see it, they only had 12 atoms at a time so it would be invisible to us
They're too small...
if an antimatter touches anything it will cause a big explosion, 1 gram if antimatter can destroy whole NEW YORK!
I don't think all antimatter disappeared in the beginning, all we know is that stuff around us is made of matter, there could be entire Galaxies made of antimatter somewhere. just a thought.
Consider a galaxy made of antimatter. Now it would interact like regular matter and thus be attracted to other matter, and if two galaxies ran into eachother or just any other form of regular matter, then there would be tremendous amounts of energy and gamma rays released from the humongous amounts annihilations. One planet made of gamma rays reacting with another would most definitely be detected, however we have never detected such things. this it's very improbable that there are large masses of anti matter in the universe, even if possible.
Josua Thurnheer on top of that antimatter super Novea would not produce neutrinos that we can detect, they would produce other cocktails of particles that we can detect, that have never been detected.
I mean, I think, most of the antimatter particles would be annihilated by common matter if they come near enough our sphere of normal matter. but the tough that somewhere in the universe could be a cloud of galaxies made of antimatter, only thing we would see is the light or not even that if its behind the observable wall.
If the galaxies collide with common matter, then sure, but like our near galaxy group it could be isolated from other galaxies. we are only possible to collide with a few galaxies the other will vanish due space inflation. If in the beginning most matter collided with antimatter i would not be surprised if some matter and antimatter separated in pockets of their own kind.
Josua Thurnheer again. we would know because of their particles given off by super novae.
You get the feeling there is an event horizon somewhere and, on the other side of it, there is an anti-matter universe.
4:09 *Intense and profound speech about experience and our place in the universe* 4:10 *dogs*
Lol
🙄🙄
"The whole universe is made of matter. "
*Insert Donald Trump meme*
"Wrong"
correct.... it is made up of anti-matter and the regular matter is gone.
antimatter bullet.
so you want to use antimaterial to kill humans?
Adromedox or the air
Satoshi Nakamoto an antimatter bullet isn’t to unreasonable. I saw a RUclips video about antimatter, and they were talking about rocket launches fueled by it and stuff like that, and one of the things was a bullet and I can’t remember the exact number, but they said they’d put an extremely small amount of antimatter on the bullet tip or something like that. There was more to it but I honestly can’t remember so I didn’t help much but yeah
Unyt once it was fired it would make contact with the air atoms and dissipate before it could even hit it's target
Unyt how do you fire it
5:22 _"Making Anti-matter takes billion times more energy than what we get from the annihilation."_
*Where Does The Rest Of The Energy Go? Does It Change Into Some Different Form Of Energy ?*
Than what "we get" not what is produced
God! The reason behind me going through the comment box was to find an answer to this question only!!!
Most of the energy used to produce anti matter is just magnetism and force. Force gets absorbed by surrounding matter and magnetism gets cancelled out from Earths magnetic field
Morever there are things like decceleration of protons and other stuff that requires energy
Goes in heat. Antimatter creation is an very small accidental byproduct of the process of particle collisions,
Anti-matter seems to be like my ex pointless, a waste of energy, and contradictive
Yet you're still attracted to her :P
Yet she matters as you are talking bout her right now :P
Syah Markom, She "matters." I see what you did there.
Just get over her, if i was her reading this, it would only make me laugh. :D
but can bring destruction if wanted
It 's actualy (-2)^2 not -2^2
la liberté it could be both dumbass
@@keaganl3348 No it could not be both as -2^2 is the same as 0 - 2^2, which would equal -4 following BEDMAS (PEDMAS). The bracket is necessary in order to make it (-2)^2 = 4.
Do you know that 0 is not written before negative numbers but it is actually there? well, the same goes for parentheses outside negative numbers. You dont have to write them, but they are inferred. So -2^2 is the same as (-2)^2 the same way (-2)^2 is = (0-2)^2.
Y’all niggas always speakin italicizationphysicalphobia
A Mustapha omg guys what grade are you in we learned this in like middle school -2^2 is not the same as (-2)^2
Physics is incredible without practical use
😂
This is the greatest reply ever posted because it doesn't matter.... LMAO
Apart from nuclear fission, nothing is useful.
3:45 Science suddenly escalated to philosophy
So how do they make the "- p" and "+ e", what are they made of?
a bad gym class(-p+e=e=-physical+education)
物理の対生成を調べて。 Pair production
An electron isn't made of anything. It's an electron.
its not made out of nothing... well thats what we predict
sorry
i meant they are made out of different charges of quarks...but thats allwe think its made out of...
Is it possible to create antimatter materials like gold, silver etc... by making antimatter particles come together?
PolarFlame Theoretically possible, yes. But we can't even do that beyond a few atoms with regular matter, so we're not there yet to even find out.
Probably, but it costs a TON of money even to make antihelium, and I'm unsure if we've even made antilithium yet. Even if someone DOES find out a way to make antimatter as complex as a transition metal, the cost of creating it would outweigh the cost of selling it, and I'm not even taking into consideration the cost of *containing the stuff.
*The entire reason metals like gold and silver are worth so much is because they don't corrode or tarnish, antimatter is essentially the opposite.
It would be insanely difficult, and if it touched literally anything (even air) it would make an explosion bigger than a nuke
No, you can't. That's ridiculous. They're made out of different particles, which means they aren't the same thing. Simple.
LOOK AT THE FRICKEN DATE
It all doesn't matter.
It doesn't antimatter either
does anti-matter to me
Mussplay plese stawp
no
Atomic Man! no
This is the kind of interesting subjects schools should teach. Everything else they teach has nothing to do with what we will do in life but still this is cool.
Wait if there was an equal number of matters and antimatters in the beginning, how was there any matter left after annihilation?
Bryan G Beyond human comprehension. We dont even possess enough brain power to understand something like that but on the other hand anything is possible through God
Percy Hitsugaya Too bad youre going to hell
Pay attention, lol.
They believed there should've been an qual amount, but..
1:45 "No one knows why the Big Bang created more matter than anti-matter"
Might be neutrinoless double-beta decay.
"Normally, some radioactive atoms' unstable nuclei will lose a neutron via beta decay - the neutron transforms into a proton by releasing an electron and a tiny particle called an electron antineutrino. A mirror image can also occur, in which a proton turns into a neutron, releasing a positron and an electron neutrino - the normal-matter counterpart to the antineutrino. Double-beta decay happens when two electrons and two antineutrinos (the antimatter counterparts of neutrinos) are released: basically, the beta decay happens twice. Scientists have long theorized a neutrinoless version of this process - something that would suggest that the two neutrinos annihilated each other before being released from the atom. Essentially, the neutrino behaves as its own antimatter sibling.
(Particles of matter that are their own antiparticles are called Majorana fermions, after the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana, who hypothesized their existence in 1937.)
If neutrinos and antineutrinos behave differently from each other, that could help to explain *how* all matter wasn't annihilated at the instant the universe formed."
ThePresident Gaming
Can this God supposedly do logically impossible things (like create an actual perfect circle, a circle with an infinite radius, a circle with four corners, or a colorless blue married bachelor)
Or...
Does anything this God somehow creates end up being conveniently, logically possible?
I don't know if I should take this seriously or not... .-.
Carlos Olivares lol same
Carlos Olivares Umm are you who I think you are?
why
ummm Not sure lol
#AprilFools
Technicaly its believed, that the lorenz-force would be inverted in an antimatter universe. So it wouldnt be entirely the same if everything was made out of antimatter.
Wrong. The lorenz-force would be in the opposite direction for an opposite charge and the SAME magnetic field, indeed, but you're not thinking far enough..... because what generated that magnetic field? If it's the same scenario, it would have been caused by opposite electric charges and thus the magnetic field lines would point in the opposite direction, so actually the lorenz force would be the same after all.
medexamtoolsdotcom is correct because in the lorenz force equation , just the direction of force will change due to introduction of a negative sign
Immediately after the big bang: 50% matter, 50% antimatter
Today: Everywhere you go, only matter. Antimatter, where are you?
Lol...got the joke.. 😂
There was 51% of matter, otherwise the universe as we know would not be formed.
𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙮!! 😛👍🏻😂😂𝙜𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙟𝙤𝙠𝙚
@@Beach3z That exactly was my point
What if antimatter could be used to break through anything. Since both matter and antimatter annihilate then if you have enough you could get through something
Zippy DaFish are you 12?
Lol Troll nope 14 how bout you?
Me too... Where you from?
Lol Troll usa
Can you use anti matter to destroy radiation from nuclear fallout? LoL
Matter: *exists*
Antimatter: Im going to end our whole career
@Brayan Carmona think of hugging a creeper in minecraft
Matter: uno reverse
I hate RUclips comments that are memes. If I want memes I go to a RUclips video that has memes in the actual video. That's why I hate your comment.
@@MrBelles104 This was 8 months ago and when it became more common it really becomes annoying even in serious videos.
@@RitsuTainakaFin So you are proving my point.
All that matter/antimatter conflagration and there was still enough left over for a universe.
Think about that.
This got me questioning my whole existence
Dont believe this guy
Dark matter no wonder the metal in math or you don't care
-2^2 without the parentheses holding the negative made me cringe
Max Johnson it's still correct, pemdas
Max Johnson No, it's not. "-2^2" is negative 4. "(-2)^2" is positive 4.
Max Johnson
well they used a different color.
I'm still recovering from that, too, Max. UGH! [flips a table]
Max Johnson Even though I'm a natural science student that looked odd for me
thankfuly for the reply section I found the problem
but hey, Max,let me make you happy
here "(-2)^2= +4"
0:22 I thought he said..."LOTS AND LOTS OF METH." HAHAHAHA
druggy
😂
Great video! I think it’s quite possible for us to use the explosion of antimatter and regular matter to power our spacecrafts to reach further places, planets, etc. it’s definitely not going to be easy, and it may take longer than we would expect..but to just say it’s absolutely impossible? Nah, there’s a way that this can work.
It's just my concept, please correct me if I'm thinking in a wrong way. Let us say that all the positive numbers represent matter and negative numbers represent anti matter. Let us take number two for example.
Now, (2)+(-2)=0 that means when matter collides with antimatter, things get into null.
Now, 2*2=4, a positive number, so the consequence is a matter.
Now, (-2)*(-2)=4, even though (-2) is antimatter, the consequence of (-2)*(-2) is a matter but there is one mystery again in this concept, if this (-2)*(-2)=4 concept works that means, every single time this antimatter is getting added up in this multiplication it is converted into matter, so, how exactly it's getting converted back into matter while interacting with other antimatter in a certain way is still a mystery.
I just wonder, if there is any thing that resembles the properties of number 1.
Wee need to weaponize it. To have the most spectacular distraction possible. Can you imagine shooting someone not with regular old bullets but with anti-mater.
Mike Karapetyan Also, the bullet would annihilate with the gun you were carrying it in, killing you and possibly everyone around as well. Awesome maybe. Effective? No.
It wouldn't work. If you shot an anti-matter bullet, it would just crash into the air in our atmosphere and POOF it's gone. Plus, you couldn't use gun powder, you'd need a magnet coil gun, which haven't been invented to be practical.
Mike Karapetyan Weaponize it.
hmm,
american?
what if you could make a large ray of antimatter and shoot it? Would the object you shoot it at just disintegrat
nielson jack It would be very destructive. Every particle in that antimatter stream would turn into pure energy as soon as it met its antiparticle. A 'large ray' would produce a devastating explosion. It might not even reach the object you shot it at though because it would react with the air. However, the resulting blast would most certainly destroy the object. And the weapon. And you. And pretty much everything else in sight.
5:00 hahaha xD +1 for sound effects
XD
he said mit for an explosion sound XD
lol I was playing the video in the background and was so confused when I heard this
Hang on,”matter +antimatter =Energy ”,right?
Then,”E=mc2”means that after the Big Bang,matter and antimatter disappeared Into energy,energy became matter!
The sum of Energy in the universe is in no way 0. The sum of momentum and angular momentum are 0, for, hopefully, obvious reasons. But you can't sum energy to 0, as it can only be positive, unless you literally set your zero point to be the summed energy of the universe, but that's not at all meaningful.
Potential energy is not a meaningful single quantity, and can be made positive or negative depending on where we choose to arbitrarily set our zero. So, trying to claim that is somehow always sums to zero when taken with internal and kinetic energies, makes no sense, as, we can always choose our zero point to make it sum to whatever we please.
For instance, when calculating gravitational potential, we often choose our zero to be at infinity, but we can just as 'correctly' say that our zero is at the centre of a planet. This is basically the arbitrary constant of integration being freely choose-able.
Dark energy just isn't a kind of quantity that makes sense to be "added" to say, kinetic energy. That's like trying to add an amount of potatoes to an electric field strength.
In general, energy is only meaningful in changes.
In fact, since we require Omega to be 1 for a flat universe, it is necessary that the mass-energy contribution is equal to the critical density, and therefor NOT zero.
What you're talking about is a hypothesis called the Zero-Energy Universe, which, is indeed, hypothesised for a flat universe, but it takes matter as positive energy and gravity as negative energy, provided that we set zero at infinity, and has exactly nothing to do with "Energy" in the conventional sense.
It could be a good idea to read the things you post.
No, because that equation also works with Anti-matter, hence the 'C' meaning charge.
You can just simply not say that if a system consists of a pulley, a spring and 2 blocks the force won't be 3ma. It'd be 2ma + kx
Not all forces are equal and same goes for energy
As of the processes go ∆E=0 for internal processes under certain conditions
Like the temperature should be constant, but the temperature during big bang was in no way constant
Other factors too are considered
lolzomgz1337 Yeah some energies are referencial energies. U say U=Mgh with respect to ground or kq1q2/r² with respect to distance so here we speak with respect to something so £E cannot be zero
Paul Dirac must be most underrated scientist ever... discovering something that nobody had ever thought of or even considered.
_Wow, Dan brown nostalgia..._
Tushar Sadhwani The worst kind of nostalgia 🤢
Very good episode, to tell you the true before I saw this video I thought that we could use antimater for space travel (thank you STAR TREK for lying to me)
The very first statement in this video is likely untrue. I couldn't complete the rest of the video.
Technically the energy released from the Annihilation of matter meeting anti matter is so efficient it would be exponentially better than using fission or fusion energy to power a starship, although the lack of other properties limits it to that role (And the creation and stockpiling of Anti matter to use is a whole other issue altogether)
You really believe what a Sci-fi franchise says? I mean, yeah, Star Trek is a Medium (Semi-Realistic) Sci-Fi Franchise and makes more sense then Star Wars but still
If you assume that star trek used the space bubble to go faster than light then then mount of energy you need amounts to fucking massive amount of matter and anti matter. Like solar systems worth.
Todor Djogo we could use it within a photon thruster
1:25 I've always wondered how we are sure all the antimatter combined. What if with all that energy a ton of matter shot one way and a ton of antimatter shot the other?
It’s possible. There are telescopes being made to see if they can detect the gamma radiation from the boundaries between matter and antimatter galaxies
imagine carrying 1 kg anti-matter in magneticfield and then suddenly it reacts with matter. :/
@Lee Ruan 😂🤣🤣𝙇𝙈𝘼𝙊 𝙨𝙤 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙚..
So if anti matter and matter annihilate themselves when they meet, that means it breaks the law of matter conservation right?
Kirin Yardberry no, it's energy conservation, And it's preserved because the matter turns into an amount of energy determined by e=mc^2
Matter is just a form of energy. When annihilated the matter just turns into another form of energy.
And, just to paint the whole picture, you could run two gamma rays into each other and create a matter-antimatter pair, so it works both ways to meet the law of conservation of energy
Kirin Yardberry nope, they just convert to a form of energy
Kirin Yardberry no the resultant energy produced is equivalent to the matter and antimatter used so it fits with the model
10 nanograms = 4 hours of light??? I understand the immense energy that went into creating it, but this just sounds amazing. If we were to discover some way to create anti matter efficiently, it could power things really efficiently!
but u would need the energy in the first place so kinda hard to produce but best battery ever if produce
Thumbnail looks like the rasengan
KAAAAAAA
MEEEEEE
HAAAAA
MEEEEE
HAAAAAAA
What?? ^^
What did you edit out at 5:03 ¿ There's an unusual skip in between.
0:44 are you serious?? is adding parentheses that hard? will it kill you to have a correct answer?
continue.
also, the matter-anti matter naming situation is the same as the plus minus naming thing (electrons flow against electricity and such)
רותם שלו !!Nerd
Monodim what? He's correct. -2^2 equals -4. (-2)^2 equals 4.
Nadeem S nerd
I prefer the term smarter than you
Monodim en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
Marvelous Information Sir. Chand sir ne bhi hame di thi. He is also very intelligent.
His info if wrong
You can't touch this , dudududu ...
I had a doubt that in which materials antimatter are made you solved it.this very very incredible
Antimatter is used in the warp engines of Star Trek ships .
M Lau Interesting...
M Lau use and trap positrons from positron emission and use that?
we just need to get hold of one of those then. sorted.
Dilithium crystals regulate it. A fictional element.
The Ghostbusters had proton packs on their backs. "Each one of us is wearing an unlicensed nuclear accelerator on his back... Switch me on"... (Stands back about a foot lol)
I want to eat antimatter
Rich peoples bleach
It would just annhilate in your mouth
It would be a humongous explosion and you and the general area you were in would be destroyed
You can't touch it ...
For everyone who said "you would die", don't you think that was the point?
Physics or all together science is incredible and amazing 👍🏼
I think it's pretty clearly possible that there's some significant difference, we just haven't isolated it/discovered what it is yet. There's a reason for our universe's matter/antimatter disparity, and it could be that something about it becomes unstable at a certain point.
Them standing in front of the anti matter factory makes it look like they're sending in front of a green screen
Dude, your videos are top notch, but get someone to cut your hair properly.
You might be going for that dictator-remembered in history kind of look but man...
Peace
Who cares?
woah its ksi
That doesn't matter
That antimatters
KSI lol wtf 😆
Our Parallel Universe is consists of Antimatter..!
thats a good hypothesis to think about ^ but only till you can prove it is it real, maybe our minds or dreams travel to the anti matter area?
And proper grammars!
No, half our universe is made of antimatter. In fact, On of our space ships Voyager 1 is slowing down do to the gravity of nearby antimatter stars.
Antimatter is oh most definitely real. It is actually produce in thunderbolts, and can be detected. Only a few atoms are produced and blow up as little sparks in the atmosphere. Many escape the atmosphere due to there shear smallness and fly off into space. Antimatter can be used for space travel, but must be used cautiously.
Antimatter is the Death of all living creature of Earth ...and so Matter cannot be seen
Does the positron thing mean that antimatter can't conduct electricity or does positivity/negativity not matter there?
My theory is that there is another part of the universe, isolated from our observable one, made out of antimatter. Half and half, whole galaxies, whatever. They cant touch or interact so they would be like bubbles.
Experience We know this isn’t true, the Big Bang contained anti matter and matter but there was a little more matter than anti matter that now composed the universe.
well every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so i dont think there would be any difference in amount of matter/antimatter. i think those rules would apply. idk, just my theory ;)
While you are correct with "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" another universe with antimatter COULD'VE existed, but sadly only for a few seconds before matter wiped it out, and your "Bubble" theory is a rather interesting one, however it just (sadly) can't, in any way, be true, and I will explain why. It couldn't work because what your saying is that there are borders to universes, each with different physics and all that, but your also saying that these borders have either,
A. No physics and it's just an extremely weird area between them, one that we can't even describe using words or pictures or anything.
or
B. They are pretty much black holes that would warp our bodies until we died, or just died once we touched the area around there.
And the more likely one would be A. if I'm being completely honest, and the reason for that is there are areas on EARTH that have different areas of gravity, like it's heavier in some areas and lighter in others, and this points toward that our universe is like this, as In imagine the gravity being physics, so in some areas it would have less physics and in others it would have heavier physics (Ex: Heavier physics would mean we wouldn't be able to have planes because the simple laws of physics would be enforced upon any living thing in that area to the extreme, possibly killing some. And Lighter physics would mean not only could planes fly with ease, but humans could jump higher and possibly be able to breathe for small amounts of time in space)
And as for USS Gerald R. Ford 12th CSG's response:
We actually know nothing about the Big Bang, except that it DID happen, and that it MIGHT close on itself and then loop back and create itself again. And antimatter could actually support an entire universe, like if we found the secret to antimatter, we could fit types of hazmat suits to make it so that it would allow us to go into anti matter areas, and there actually is still some antimatter in the universe, and they ARE in our observable universe.
I know this is like a huge essay on antimatter and matter but hey, now you get a free essay y'know? if you ever need it I guess...
If you liked this stuff though I'd love it if you subbed so I could get my scientific part of my channel running, and yes, I know a guy named "BUTTFACE GAMER" doesn't seem like a science nerd but I know quite a lot so yeah.
If you made it this far have a great day! :D
this is actually really weird though... we still don't know what was there in universe before big bang theory... was there nothing? just nothing? but nothing isn't even possible... also, if there was nothing and how did that explosion in big bang theory occur? seriously these are some really tough questions...
BUTTFACE GAMER We don’t know if the big bang occurred or not. All we have to go off of to prove the big bang is certain mathematical formulas, specific concepts, and the cosmic background radiation inhabiting the universe. Honestly you’d have better luck proving the existence of Atlantis than the big bang.
Lets make cancer out of anti-matter!
Well it can be cure
In a way BECAUSE if itntouch other cells causing the body to explode
lol your name is my reaction to your comment...
Hahahahahaha if you did it wouldn’t just destroy the country depending not the size and weight say goodbye to the EU!!
Let's call it anticancer
Well that's Gay ye let's put antimatter in people so it explodes and kills not only the patient but everyone in the hospital as well!
_"The whole universe is made of matter?"_ How do you know? The only thing we can know about is the observable universe, not the universe per se.
Lol true, we've never been to the end
2 minutes into this Video & I have Learned MORE than watching the previous video i watched titled
why Anti matter is 27 Trillion Dollars a Gram, by the physics Girl
The whole time I was thinking about antipizza
Dirac saw 2^2=4... Made me cringe a little. He attributed the negative solution to the relativistic pythagorean identity to antimatter.
marcusrayrosales1 nah he just dun did found out that -2^2 = 4 cause he smart and he is the firtst to notice
Quantum Infidel Yep yep. (-2)^2=4; hence, antimatter! Do I get the logic?
Well, the "square root of the Klein-Gordon equation" nature of the Dirac equation pretty much comes down to exactly that. I'm not sure what he said that made you cringe.
Jold The Klien-Gordon equation comes from the relativistic pythagorean theorem E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2 , but with substitution of the momentum and the energy operators in for their respective scalars (e.g. p=h/(2i*pi)d/dx). You're not really saying anything by bring up the Klien-Gordon equation... Even still Dirac attributed the negative energy solution of the original equation to antimatter.
marcusrayrosales1 _"The Klien-Gordon equation comes from the relativistic pythagorean theorem E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2 , but with substitution of the momentum and the energy operators in for their respective scalars (e.g. p=h/(2i*pi)d/dx)."_
Yes, I know that. The Dirac equation is essentially using a sqrt(E^2) operator.
_"You're not really saying anything by bring up the Klien-Gordon equation..."_
I'm saying that the Dirac equation is the square root of the Klein-Gordon equation. I said exactly what I meant.
"Even still Dirac attributed the negative energy solution of the original equation to antimatter."
Yes, exactly. The fact that there are negative solutions is due to the form of the equation, and is essentially the property that O(E)=E^2 has two solutions for E, one positive and one negative. That's what the guy in the video said, and that's what I said.
When the math teacher says you can't have a negative answer:
So, an antimatter bomb would basically be the ultimate weapon? Since it would react with anything. The bomb would basically (probably) be a magnetic field well and upon the shell breaking, the antimatter inside would react with everything, releasing the energy according e=mc2?
Angels and Demons
*"May I touch it?"*
*"No, honey."*
Why would you touch your hon btw
what if anti matter was really a parrell universe.
DoCtorDestiny Hd my thoughts exactly. its more like a different dimension. a mirror image. another thing if hydrogen and antihydrogen are mirror images of eachother so is there an antimatter earth in earth already. that would probably explain supernatural cases with spirits wandering.
a soul/spirit , off one of my theory is antimatter.
another is antimatter is alternate of everything. as mentioned in this video about a antimatter table would probably exist.
the biggest questions I came up with: what if you were able to touch an antimatter table? we are of matter, correct? the table wouldn't explode. it would just disappears from us? where would it go? maybe somewhere it can exist between space and time but with other antimatter.
or maybe it stays there because they aren't identical mirror images.
so let's put two tables identical but mirrored. antimatter and matter?
which one will disappear? it will depend on what world does it exist within. this is another matter earth. matter is every where her.
antimatter table must go. the analihation process sends it to antimatter earth that's within earth or to a different dimensionsal antimatter earth somewhere else?
I recall reading strange things from scientists, theoried about differences between parallel earths, alternate reality earth and now dimensional earths.
so I put my thoughts to these theories.
oh so these multiple earths have matter versions " parallel earths" to antimatter versions mirrored earths, within each other. spiritual earths, "alternate reality earths" and dimensional earths in different locations.
i have a strong feeling that the "analihation" process does more than what we know so far.
maybe cern opens both spiritual earth and the antimatter earth within this earth " alternate reality mirrored " earth.
ever read about how decisions would play a role for these earths?
Well the whole point of Annihilation is that it cancels out not just antimatter, but also our matter. So if you, say, touched that antimatter table, both your matter and whatever antimatter you touch would be instantaneously gone. I assume it is all converted to gamma radiation since matter can be converted to energy directly.
The point is, if you touched that table, only the parts of either you or the table that came in contact would be Annihilated. So basically, you'd lose a bit of finger and the table would lose a bit of its smooth surface. Considering putting two identical, but opposite matter objects together, there is no "which would disappear" because, quite simply, both tables would be converted to gamma radiation.
The whole idea that antimatter has formed an alternate dimension is an interesting and maybe possible idea even though no known science can currently support it. I for one don't believe it would be possible because, as said, antimatter was in theory completely annihilated by contact with matter throughout the new universe and therefore does not exist outside of earth's labs. Spirits and alternate realities are just stories made up to give meaning to death as well. If an alternate antimatter dimension existed, there would be no parallel between the worlds. Simply put, they would live completely separate from us. No contact whatsoever. If there were, both parallel universes would annihilate and we'd all be converted to theoretical nothingness, along with the rest of our universe if both are identical.
Of course, I'm certainly no genius and there definitely isn't any known science to support anything I've said about alternate dimensions, but I stand by my word.
Sanus Chaus true but these were about particles. so what about With possible other things like the so called table.
when i brought up analihation was with these other things like the antimatter table.
about the spiritual side of it. electro magnetic waves do attract ghosts or things like that. just like it did with antihydrogen.
these is still no prove of these different earths or anything of course. if there was, what i said would be "some" explanation to it.
also spiritual earth is not separate.
Who knows. It could have been the smart version of you that died in the collision with matter. You know. The one that knows how to spell "Parallel".
3:00 “oh!” - yes brilliant
Always wish I done better in school and studied science , now that I’m older I find it amazing and so interesting
If 1 gram of matter and 1 gram of anti-matter would touch it would create an explosion greater than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. So at the big bang these massive amount of mass which are both made of matter and anti-matter would fly into eachother and if they would be the same size as earth ( which is EXTREMELY small ) they would weigh approximately 6,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000 (6 x 1024) kilograms. And 1000 times that for milligrams. So think of an explosion that many times greater than the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb combined and which is incredibly small. Big bang was some fireworks but explosions that were probably 6,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000... [endless] times larger than a nuke. Mind officially blown.
Pls read all
You have to multiply by 1000000 to go from kg to mg, you said 1000, that's gonna give you regular grams
Leon Barnett black holes are not created by explosion. They are created by compression
Leon Barnett black hokes are formed when a star dies. All the gravity and mass gets compressed into a single point. Thats why black holes have such immense gravity
Oscar Lenman Ouma you got the cash 62.7trillion us dollars
They probably solved it but it didn’t matter because...
They didn’t show their work 😔
When I was a kid my friend was staying the night. I go, "Maybe there are worlds inside the sun....." He goes "Yeeeeeeaaaaaahhhhh."
0:29 ... slightly incorrect. It was the Dirac Equation, not x^2. I get it was a a reference to how the equation has a symmetry, but anyone who doesn't know this will assume x^2 = 2 was the equation that changed everything.