In honesty this reminds me of project cars but in this case you make a project gun and this is your base gun you choose. The parts inside look like they don’t need much so you just gotta remake the shape and fix the surface controls do you don’t end up blowing off a finger
I read about a guy who left his Zip22 in the passenger seat of his car and went into a store. When he came back, someone had broken into his car and left a Zip22 next to his.
You might land a successful hit on Wonder Woman with this. She's attacked by bizarre-looking guns all the time. But she'd never expect ineffective firearms being flung at her for an *opening move!*
I love how they said to hang it off a carbine as if you could actually pull that stupid trigger while it's sitting on the rail, and even then who knows if it'll fire XD
The design is intended to mislead customs officers. Officer: "What is this thing?" Answer: "It's a toner cartridge for my printer". Officer: "Okay, move along".
I think that really was his intention but for different reasons. His philosophy that everybody had the right to self defense presumably applied even to those who are afraid of guns because of pop culture and a fear mongering 24 hour news cycle. He made the gun cheap enough that anybody could afford it, and so unlike other guns that it avoids a lot of the scary baggage tied to regular guns. The execution of that idea was awful but there was logic to his thought process. On the other hand, a gun that doesn't look like a gun is a recipe for accidental shootings, so perhaps people would learn to be more afraid of it pretty quickly had it caught on.
@@LukeCrawford-n7n You'd be better off educating the public about guns rather than going ass-around-elbow to create a "non scary gun". Back in the 50s and 60s gun clubs were common at high schools and people didn't have such an overarching fear of guns (and less fear porn anti-gun propaganda).
“Why are you pointing a toy at me?”, “do you need a moment to fix the thing?”, “why did you try to rob me with a broken gun?”, “do you want to try throwing it to cause some damage?”.
This would make a great weapon for a horror game. Your only ranged defense option is this. It might save your life if the monster is closing in, but your best option is still to remain hidden and unseen.
You're right. In horror games like Silent Hill, all you have is a flashlight - to make you feel more scared and helpless. Having this gun instead would amplify that feeling, by letting you THINK you might be able to deter a monster, but then it jams and rips away the shred of hope you were relying on. 😆
So, one funny thing, is that this gun is now in a new game: Cruelty Squad. Every time you click to fire it, there's a 1/3 chance of it firing, a 1/3 chance of it doing nothing, and a 1/3 chance of damaging you instead.
@@actuallyasriel And even better, you get it in a casino level, by running a gun slot-machine, that has a 1/9000 chance of actually giving you the Zippy 3000; AND you have to finish the level with it in your inventory (1 of 2 weapon slots) to keep it; AND this is a game where you can die very easily (just a few shots); AND if you die, you have to start ALL OVER.
With the reverse rail option, I now want to see a very rail-covered AR-15 just bristling with zip-22s. Including one mounted upside-down on top of a scope whose scope mount has additional top-rail
yeah kinda like how the some bb guns has butt stocks it could clip into and other odd accessories to turn a pistol into other stances. as far as safe may as well weapon a rubix cube lol.
He's so polite! There's usually a subtext of exasperated pity: "I don't know what misfortunes made you attempt this lifestyle. You must be unhappy as a firearm."
Medical Man Port, uhmmm, no, it's not even "a good idea". How could such horrid ergonomics be considered a good idea? And yes, the execution makes it even worse.
The best American firearm designers came together and now, with the fusion of modern expertise and the latest production technology, have finally created a semi-auto you can play Russian roulette with.
I was waiting for him to insert a magazine that would fill out the rest of the grip shape. Then he removed a little walnut of .22 goodness and I was like ".....oh. Oh dear."
Other people have brought up the point that this could have been referring to IEDs, but uh, while I believe that could have been the intent by USFA/Doug Donnelly it is still just so _incredibly_ dumb on so many levels. EDIT: corrected the typo after someone pointed it out
I get what Donnely's concept was, but there was nothing forcing him, or the engineers to make it in this form factor. Who said it needed to be a brick? Who said it needed to have such a short bolt travel? Who said that they shouldn't make the bolt out of metal, or cast it, or at least weigh the bolt down by filling it with shot like a deadblow hammer? Did they design the shape first and the gun second?
I think the form factor is designed to have no potential points for catching on clothing or such. And I guess to that goal the concept might be to just not look overall like a gun. Also they clearly had concepts for accessories, for example the SBR stock. I think the form factor of the ZIP aids integration with those other products, too.
Probability should be .75 4 options like the odds of one coin of two coming up heads fire/fire fire/no fire no fire/fire no fire/no fire 25% none fire, 50% one of the two fires, 25% both fire.
@@gastonbell108 That's how the military and law forces disarm bombs, by shooting them. In most cases bombs are shoddily made, sometimes detonating on accident at random or even being garbage that you could disable by a rock toss. If the bomb is placed in an area safe from collateral damage like roads or buildings that are already damaged, they dont risk human life or expensive robots to disarm them, and just open fire. They do disarm them with those options, but only in cases where its impossible or risky to shoot the damn thing.
@@jacobhinton6178 I can understand bomb disposal via gunfire: I've seen it done with a .50-caliber rifle. But that's because they can shoot it from far away. Even a small bomb has a greater explosive radius than a .22 pistol. Doesn't seem like a good idea to save a few pennies on a bullet that puts you in harm's range.
When I was a kid, “zip gun” was a slang term for a homemade.22 where a round was fired through a tube, attached to a piece of wood, using little more than a rubber band and a nail.
Doug was a member at our gun club. He filmed the shooting portions of his advertisements there. The one time I met him, he let me shoot Zip Gun serial #1; he was so proud of it and that example was 100% reliable, even with garbage ammo. I feel bad saying it (because he is a really nice guy) but I’ve probably shot the only reliable zip gun.
Well, I'm one of the few who have liked this thing ever since it came out. Because of its simplicity. I like simplicity. Ian points out an important fact though - which is what others have noticed as well. Simple fix is: getting a stronger spring. That's all! A harder spring and the gun works flawlessly every time (otherwise it is prone to jamming). So in the original gun the creator probably had a heavier spring. Someone thought they'd skimp on a smaller spring, which made the gun jam on almost every round. Search for zip 22 spring, here on youtube and you'll see a totally different gun - from just such a small and simple fix.
Curious. What makes this "simple." Looks complex as hell to me; and dangerous. If I just picked one up, I would have NO IDEA how to charge a round or take it apart. It took Ian 10 minutes to take it apart and I counted 18 parts on a basic dis-assembly!!!!
They could've outsourced it to Keltec and they would've somehow made it not only good but successful because they're the only ones that can make weird shit and get away with it
If I recall correctly when they were marketing this I think you were supposed to use those charging handles against the edge of a table. I don't remember where I heard that but I'm pretty sure I heard that from someone back when they were originally making this I really wanted one of them I thought it was the neatest thing ever but alas I wasn't 21 yet.
@Roderick storey Hey, you don't have to point it down you can always push it against the edge of the table keeping it horizontal. So you accidentally shoot your friend in the spleen instead. Okay, I'm not saying it was a good idea or good design, it was just *neat* okay.
Climb carefully down off that high horse (wouldn't want you to die in such a fall) and think about what you said for just a second: How safe is it? Being unloaded, perfectly safe. Hand in front of the barrel, whatever, it's NOT YET CHARGED! MEANWHILE, millions of Appendix Carry evangelicals are walking around with Glocks, Sigs, and XDs loaded, pointed at their cocks all day, saying 4 O'Clock IWB is wrong and unsafe. There's dumb bumblefucks posing as experts all over, it's an infinite resource.
As someone who’s owned a few of these. the reason they were so bad is because the return spring was very weak, causing the gun to not eject the rounds, but after purchasing an upgrade spring and oiling the firearm up it runs flawlessly. If you have one and want it to run better, replace the trigger spring and the trigger and the return spring
Naw, SigSauer holds the record. I shot one once and immediately went blah, ick, and forgot about ever buying one. Their proportions are weird. Don't like the angles. It's why I bought an HK.
This gun is, most likely, still killing owners and passersby regularly. That being said it has probably saved a lot of people with failures. Jamming and the like.
The main safety feature is.... if you're opponent gets ahold of your weapon, they won't be able to use it against you. While they're trying to figure that out, you're going to have a lot of time to run away. And you're going to want to run away out of embarrassment.
When the other person is out of ammo id throw the zip at him and say "here use this" then id proceed to beat him with the plank because he cant get the zip to fire.
mechanical safety vs operational safety, I'm assuming. I'm far from an expert (being Dutch, gun control is very tight so the only guns I see are the ones on the other side of my pc screen), but it's technically not wrong if it won't accidentally discharge.
You can push the charge handles back with the edge of a table Than no fingers will be near the muzzle and the muzzle will be safely pointed to the floor. Everyone would know that if they read the instructions.
@@billbailey55 I'm not seeing it in the instruction manual www.all4shooters.com/en/shooting/pistols/usfa-zip22-modular-pistol/zipoperatormanualwebedition.pdf
I remember having a nerf pistol that attached to the rail sections of some other nerf guns. It actually shot reliably though, so I guess it's not that similar.
Looking at the design, it looks like you reload it by throwing it at your enemy after which it explodes and magicaly reconstructs itself in your hands.
After this, I don't want to hear ANYONE complain about bench stripping a Hi-Point! This thing is a lawsuit in a box that would feed a lawyer and his family for several years!
Hi point still ugly as hell I just hate how it's as reliable as a fucking AK 47 I can cook the thing into a brownie and still fire it run it over with my car and still fire it it'll still fire even after I shoot it just makes it harder to slide the weapons slide and load the next round to fire it again.
For some reason, I thought it'd be a lot bigger. I absolutely lost it when he inserted the extended mag into it though, and even moreso when I saw the photo of it being mounted to another gun.
USFA: "the .22 is a less than lethal round" I'm having a hard time imagining the reactions of the legal teams for Remmington or Colt after hearing that. I imagine uncontrollable laughter followed by panic.
a legit good question, but also fairly simple to answer. they never spent enough time testing the basic design to figure out those problems i don't think.
US Firearms sold their single action revolver machinery to Standard Manufacturing in New Britain, Ct. Standard has been making the SAA ever since and it’s quality exceeds the original Colts. They all come with a case/hardened frame. I just got mine and it’s fantastic.
Right? Did they decide once it was done to put the safety tape designs on it or what. Absolutely horrible. Someone mixed up the votes on design and picked the box with the NO votes and viola.
You're forgetting the ability to "inspect" possible package bombs with .22LR fire.... from upwards of 5 to 10 feet away! .... It's DIY bomb disposal for the soldier with only pennies to spend. What's not to love?
Zippy 3000. Spent a solid 2 hours in front of that damn slot machine. I knew it was garbage but still got excited when it finally dropped. Then the joy quickly faded when I found out just how garbage it actually is.
They even failed in the naming by calling their firearm after the term for a crude homemade pistol. It's like Ford releasing a new model and calling it the Ford Jalopy.
I like the idea behind this gun. A sleek, ergonomic design that literally fits in your pocket (unlike other guns what make that claim). If they'd spent more time on design, it probably would have become a new standard for handguns.
The most interesting thing about it is that it was made in 2013. When I first saw it, I thought it was some hair-brained eccentric's idea from the 1970s, trying to invent the gun of the future.
The guy who designed/invented this, was probably hoping that if, the Obama administration, pushed very for gun control, he could sell this to them, as the "safe alternative, common sense, gun". Ya know, The Biden Gun"
If you used a picatinny on one, and then a reverse picatinny on a second one, could you mount two Zip 22's onto each other? Because that's kind of hilarious
The company I worked for was contracted by him to build the guns and so many times we tried to give suggestions to make it better but Doug was to hard headed with his big head
Watching this I thought, "Oh, well this seems like a wild initiative by someone in the 80's. Looks like it fits in an episode of Airwolf or something." Never would I have guessed it's a gun from the 2010's. At most early 1990's.
It's like the odd guns that appeared during the Clinton gun ban years - the lightweight AR pistols, the Crossfire rifle/shotgun, the pump action rifles etc. But from the 2010s.
I get it. I don't want to get it, but I get it. That 'under barrel' ZIPSBR(tm) was the whole intended purpose for the firearm. Every design point is intended for the firearm to be mounted under a rifle. Right handed ejection to stay away from left handed support hand. Funky grip that would work 'well' as an AFG. Blocky rear section to mate to a magwell like the rear of a 203. Forward charging... pegs? Protrusions? Whatever you want to call those so that it wouldn't interfere with your grip using it as an AFG. I'd bet money that USFA designed this to be used in military/police functions, got laughed at; then sold it to civilian markets. It's so much funnier to me now knowing that they tried to play Operator and failed so hard to run their whole company into the ground.
I don't know a lot about what's most tactical to add to an assault rifle, but my guess is something more powerful or more close-combat would be the most common choice, like a grenade launcher or a shotgun, or even a bayonet. A .22 seems useful to me only if you find some rodent you need to kill along the way.
Watched this video multiple times. I came to a conclusion that this gun was designed for a left handed carpenter who lost his index finger and his pinky. And in that sense it's genious.
So if Battlefield makes another game set in the present day (or, God help us, a Hardline 2), they should absolutely make this the joke pistol in the same vein of the Kolibri and the Liberator.
The liberator was actually useful though. It was a disposable single shot to ambush with. It's not a gun you use to win a battle, it's a gun you use to get a better gun off some poor, hapless bastard who was just out on patrol.
@@wolfehoffmann2697 The Zip's useful too. You point it at your enemy, and then switch to your actual sidearm and gun him down while he's doubled over laughing.
Judging by how USFA designed this weapon, and the sacrifices that were made for it, seems that the creator's vision of the gun was to drive his own company into the ground rather than actually design a cheap weapon that could be easily manufactured.
I found your video through a forum thread about horrible business decisions. Really, really good. I swear this thing looks like it should be in a bad sci-fi movie.
“Some people I’ve spoken to prefer to hold it like this” Ian... when your friends have spent enough time with one of these to give you tips you need new friends. Friends don’t let friends Zip 22
15:23 I don’t know why but that little high pitch noise made me smile. I don’t know if it’s knowing that feeling of nearly loosing something or just the noise itself.
Remarkable. Somehow ZIP managed to take the best .22 lr magazine ever designed, and inspiration from the Mk3 firing pin return spring for use as their striker spring and somehow build a gun that doesn't work around them. That takes tallent.
I wonder if you could slow the action enough to make it feed more reliably if you handed the bolt to a machine shop and had one CNC milled from aluminum or steel (or even SMS 3D printed) to give it enough mass that it takes more time to cycle, or whether that would add enough weight that the 22LR cartridge wouldn't be able to push the bolt back far enough.
@@seanmalloy7249 wow I was thinking of the same thing, to add to that. I was thinking that by it being made out of metal, it could also be milled to include a simple extractor and ejector to better hold the round and eject the casing. due to how thick it is.
I’ve heard the Vatican has had the rail mounts for the Zip’s taken off the market and locked in their Vault. As two Zips Connected together and firing both resulting in an “Über Jam” and thus beginning the chain of events that leads to the end of mankind.
This is a real life Tediore. Throw it at your enemy when it's empty, it'll probably do more damage than trying another magazine.
Nah man that's Hi-Point; Tediore has some wicked good guns.
@@sibire8284 Hi-Point makes good guns though, despite all of their unabashed ugliness.
Safer idea, hand the gun and ammo to your attacker, wait til he blows a finger off. Subdue.
Haha. No give it to your enemy. They’ll never get a round out.
Tediore from borderlands ?
This is what happens when a group full of smart people are unwilling to tell their boss his idea is stupid.
Almost as genius as manufacturing a friggin zip gun
MadJustin7 More like a bunch of yes men.
Or a group of very smart people who dont tell the moron his idea is moronic and walk away laughing with pockets stuffed full of cash
The George Lucas Effect.
I think it's called "The Government".
Somewhere in a parallell universe an angry drill Sergeant is forcing his crying troops to field strip their Zip 22's.
Not too far from ours either.
Best laugh in ages...
In honesty this reminds me of project cars but in this case you make a project gun and this is your base gun you choose. The parts inside look like they don’t need much so you just gotta remake the shape and fix the surface controls do you don’t end up blowing off a finger
Zip up!
Drop dead!
@@vspec17 ditto...
The gun is actually pretty powerful. Destroyed a whole company holy sh*t.
All without having to fire a shot
@@meshuggahshirt Not like it could
@@themightykv-5410indeed
OMG
He he he...
I almost died here man.
I was eating when I read this and almost spit everything.
One of the most funny comments I ever read.🤣😂🤣😂😂
@@mrt2this607no one cares about your cringe political takes.
I read about a guy who left his Zip22 in the passenger seat of his car and went into a store. When he came back, someone had broken into his car and left a Zip22 next to his.
lol the guy that broke in wanted to get rid of his
Lolololol
@@killert_7759 "bro I will literally commit a crime just to get rid of this fucking piece of wasted plastic"
You might land a successful hit on Wonder Woman with this. She's attacked by bizarre-looking guns all the time. But she'd never expect ineffective firearms being flung at her for an *opening move!*
Underrated comment lol 😅
The supposition that the brass could hit your hand rests entirely on the gun actually ejecting the brass.
Hey, it might eject only HALF the brass! Burns AND cuts on your hand!
When these first came out i went to a gun shop and the owner was tryna sell me one of these so bad i wasn't having it
That is predicated that it fired to begin with, otherwise no brass to eject.
The jamming is a safety feature
@@dizisill "please, for the love of God, just take this piece of shit off our hands!"
"It won't fire if you drop it." It won't fire when you pull the trigger either.
hahahahahahhhahaha
Hence the safest gun
I love how they said to hang it off a carbine as if you could actually pull that stupid trigger while it's sitting on the rail, and even then who knows if it'll fire XD
@Wiedergeboren lol!
Lolol
The design is intended to mislead customs officers. Officer: "What is this thing?" Answer: "It's a toner cartridge for my printer". Officer: "Okay, move along".
I think that really was his intention but for different reasons. His philosophy that everybody had the right to self defense presumably applied even to those who are afraid of guns because of pop culture and a fear mongering 24 hour news cycle. He made the gun cheap enough that anybody could afford it, and so unlike other guns that it avoids a lot of the scary baggage tied to regular guns. The execution of that idea was awful but there was logic to his thought process. On the other hand, a gun that doesn't look like a gun is a recipe for accidental shootings, so perhaps people would learn to be more afraid of it pretty quickly had it caught on.
@@LukeCrawford-n7n You'd be better off educating the public about guns rather than going ass-around-elbow to create a "non scary gun". Back in the 50s and 60s gun clubs were common at high schools and people didn't have such an overarching fear of guns (and less fear porn anti-gun propaganda).
A picatinny rail, for mounting a massive scope that is ten times the price of the gun, to miss more accurately.
In order to miss it has to fire
In order to miss you have to at least be able to aim
Haha more accurately. “Don’t just miss your shots, miss them with purpose”
@@Angel-wi5pu Motto of the Stormtrooper Shooting Academy.
That’s what phantom forces players do. Put a Sagittarius 40x on a Zip 22
The only gun that when pointed, raises questions rather than hands.
Underrated comment
@@jayathdesilva6179 Definetly
"PUT YOUR HANDS UP AND GIVE ME YOUR MONEY"
"lmao wtf is that get a real gun and not a VHS tape"
“Why are you pointing a toy at me?”, “do you need a moment to fix the thing?”, “why did you try to rob me with a broken gun?”, “do you want to try throwing it to cause some damage?”.
@@cr1ms0n8bit7 and when he dies from it he will claim he got shot by a Hi-point and not a VHS tape lol
When i was a little kid, i also played with VHS tapes imagining that it was a gun.
Hahahaha, the more I look at it the more it looks like a VHS tape lmao.
Underrated comment
A VHS might actually do more damage
Hahaha. Underrated
When I was a kid,literally anything was a gun, including food
@@brutusvonmanhammer same I would play with breadsticks and think that they’re shotguns😂
“In order to avoid operator failure, please fire with the incorrect hand” truly a marvel in firearms technology
Incorrect to you I’m a lefty😂
@@robertstewart5351finally, us lefties get what we truly deserve, a terrible gun
@@robertstewart5351represent!
Me too sp would my incorrect hand be my right hand?
This thing is like a reverse AK-47; extremely complex to take apart, works horribly, and destroyed the company that spawned it.
it's EXACTLY like a reverse AK-47
Small, low power, eyesore
The AK-47? The most copied and mass produced rifle in human history? You millennials need to get some education. Yeet!
@@sibottle if EXACTLY means not at all, you nailed it! Sad...
@@CaptainCraigKWMRZ ...Did you and the previous person not bother actually reading what the rest of us typed?
22 is very lethal, unless fired from this unreliable piece of garbage
Didn't have to roast em like that Ian, damn.
This thing is also Letal.... but mostly not for the Target
Lethal to any man's sense of manhood who has one
and so spaketh firearms jesus on the matter.
whyd you even bother to use the quotation marks?
@@mahnemsjef just to piss you off, bro.
"How do we make firearms safer for children?"
"I dunno, make it look like a toy."
Also make it easier to injure yourself then ever before!
Sacha Baron Cohen did that! He made teddy-guns!
@@sebastiaandewit159 lmao, This was a commercial product with "legitimate" "practical" "use" (yes, all the quotations are intentional lol).
Hannibal to Eric Andre. Lol, that's what it sounds like, amazing Q&A
yeah just make it so it won't go off until they mess with it for 2 minutes
This would make a great weapon for a horror game. Your only ranged defense option is this. It might save your life if the monster is closing in, but your best option is still to remain hidden and unseen.
I know im a year late, but Amnesia the Bunker is pretty much that idea
@@DoctorTheoBut the guns in that game are actually functional so it doesn't count
it appeared somewhat in Cruelty Sqaud
@@kueferd5671 Possibly the most accurate depiction of the gun
You're right. In horror games like Silent Hill, all you have is a flashlight - to make you feel more scared and helpless. Having this gun instead would amplify that feeling, by letting you THINK you might be able to deter a monster, but then it jams and rips away the shred of hope you were relying on. 😆
So, one funny thing, is that this gun is now in a new game: Cruelty Squad. Every time you click to fire it, there's a 1/3 chance of it firing, a 1/3 chance of it doing nothing, and a 1/3 chance of damaging you instead.
Finally, a proper representation of the Zip22!
@@actuallyasriel And even better, you get it in a casino level, by running a gun slot-machine, that has a 1/9000 chance of actually giving you the Zippy 3000; AND you have to finish the level with it in your inventory (1 of 2 weapon slots) to keep it; AND this is a game where you can die very easily (just a few shots); AND if you die, you have to start ALL OVER.
Wait really? I haven't found it yet, I gotta go looking
@@nooneinparticular5256 and thats why I love this game, its like its trying to kill me, and beating a level is so rewarding
Cruelty Squad really is an amazing game.
Ian: "Did you do it?"
Doug: "Yes."
Ian: "What did it cost?"
Doug: "Everything."
Holy shit! Can't breath.
I dont want to put my name HAHAHAHAHA
r/unexpected_thanos
This is the best comment in here.
*Zip shoots bubbles*
Doug: "I like it."
Me: mom can we have a P90
Mom: we already have a P90 at home
P90 at home:
It is like a discount P90 prototype, if you have ever seen one
Your comment reminds me of when i actually asked my dad if we could get a P90. He's currently looking into it.
The difference between fruit rings ....and fruit Loops
🤣😂
We got P90X at home on DVD /flex
With the reverse rail option, I now want to see a very rail-covered AR-15 just bristling with zip-22s. Including one mounted upside-down on top of a scope whose scope mount has additional top-rail
I also now want to see this.
Yo, Dawg...🤣
Tag Jeditobewan and he'll probably do that in H3VR at least. . . And then try to reload the ouroboros of Zippies in some silly way.
Absolute pain
We had the 6 barreled mgl in Iraq and the scope had rails on three sides so I stuck an m4 with a 320, 2 foregrips, and 2 flashlights on it.
This gun was so bad, the only thing it killed was a million dollar company
And it killed it by *not* firing a shot!
*IT'S OWN MILLION DOLLAR COMPANY
@@saturnity6 For real, hate unfunny add-ons.
That’s a lot of damage tbh
how does this not have over a thousand likes?
"I kind of see where he was going. The problem is he is kind of crazy, and where he was going wasn't somewhere anyone wanted to be."
This is great :D
yeah kinda like how the some bb guns has butt stocks it could clip into and other odd accessories to turn a pistol into other stances. as far as safe may as well weapon a rubix cube lol.
One day you’ll stumble across a prototype Zip 22 that performs flawlessly and somehow devolved into this thing.
The SA80 in pistol form
I feel like the bolt was designed to be steel and then they replaced it with polymer to cut costs... resulting in this thing.
@@KingBowserLP Does anyone want to bother testing this?
@@KingBowserLP it would probably work 1000 times better even if the bolt was made of cast zinc
I think the manufactured gun is the prototype.
It shows Ian's distain for this gun that he dry fires it so much without bothering to slow the action like he normally does. 🤣
It has that late 1980s "cheap disposable camera" aesthetic to it. Something you'd grab from 7-Eleven, fool around with and discard without regret.
Someone looked at a $200 plastic glock and thought there has to be a way to make something for half the price with 1% the reliability!
Lol, Sev would sell a disposable gun though. They totally would
It looks like something from a dystopian comic, like you'd buy it out of a vending machine and it just comes preloaded with 5 rounds.
To me it looks a bit like a scifi prop. A bit into wht the P90 or Vector are doing.
I'm amazed it's such a recent product, the whole thing smacks of a 80s cocaine fueled disaster.
I’m not sure if it is intentional, but Ian is absolutely HILARIOUS when he hates a gun
He's so polite! There's usually a subtext of exasperated pity:
"I don't know what misfortunes made you attempt this lifestyle. You must be unhappy as a firearm."
cynical Montone humor is uniquely hilarious and helps add to absurdity
Well a gun that resembles a failed abortion is going to take what it can get.
Negative reviews are always easier to write.
@@vonschlesien Especially when the subject is notoriously bad. Boring is hard to criticize.
Gun Jesus never speaks ill of a firearm. So you can tell how bad this one must be by his unabashed used of the descriptor "garbage"
they have crazy feeding problems and jams it's a good idea terrible execution
Medical Man Port, uhmmm, no, it's not even "a good idea".
How could such horrid ergonomics be considered a good idea? And yes, the execution makes it even worse.
If Judas made a gun...
He doesn't speak that good about every gun
That Terminator shotgun
"The ultimate weapon, in ejection failures and misfires. You'll be lucky to get two shots out of this thing without blowing off your fingers."
The best American firearm designers came together and now, with the fusion of modern expertise and the latest production technology, have finally created a semi-auto you can play Russian roulette with.
Truly the Gorbino’s quest of guns!
It looks like Ian actually cut his finger doing this review.😂
truly worth it aside it being 1/500 chance
*Sees thumbnail*
*knows nothing of the gun*
"How could a gun be garbage? Once he unfolds it, it should be good"
"Ohhh"
I was waiting for him to insert a magazine that would fill out the rest of the grip shape. Then he removed a little walnut of .22 goodness and I was like ".....oh. Oh dear."
that's exactly what i was thinking.
Manual of arms:
1. Take out of box
2. Throw directly in trash
3. Keep box. As it actually has some uses
Or sell it as scrap.
It could make a decent door stop.
Blad3warrior Or just "1. Take $100. 2. Throw in trash." Similar final end, but saves unnecessary motion.
"Griff dran schrauben - wegschmeißen."(screw on a handle - toss it away)
"Test that object in the middle of the street..."
"Dear user, use our firearm to take potshots at unidentified targets"
-sincerely, the USAF team
yeah I was like what the hell do they mean by that
Other people have brought up the point that this could have been referring to IEDs, but uh, while I believe that could have been the intent by USFA/Doug Donnelly it is still just so _incredibly_ dumb on so many levels.
EDIT: corrected the typo after someone pointed it out
*USFA. I very much doubt the USAF want any more to do with this thing than the average punter….
I thought it was a joke.
Prophetic
I get what Donnely's concept was, but there was nothing forcing him, or the engineers to make it in this form factor. Who said it needed to be a brick? Who said it needed to have such a short bolt travel? Who said that they shouldn't make the bolt out of metal, or cast it, or at least weigh the bolt down by filling it with shot like a deadblow hammer? Did they design the shape first and the gun second?
I think the form factor is designed to have no potential points for catching on clothing or such. And I guess to that goal the concept might be to just not look overall like a gun. Also they clearly had concepts for accessories, for example the SBR stock. I think the form factor of the ZIP aids integration with those other products, too.
My closest guess was he saw the P90 and thought rectangle=futuristic.
Buy 2 Zip 22s, one with the standard rail and the other with the reverse rail, attach them top-to-top and now you have double the reliability
So 0×0 reliability I guess that's better
But how do you hold it?
Probability should be .75
4 options like the odds of one coin of two coming up heads
fire/fire
fire/no fire
no fire/fire
no fire/no fire
25% none fire, 50% one of the two fires, 25% both fire.
You mean a lack thereof.
Double zero is still zero
Did the manual actually say “Just shoot random things in the middle of the street?”
Top notch gun safety here
They meant it for military purposes. Testing suspicious packages for bombs, would be my guess. I still have no idea why that is a good idea.
@@gastonbell108 That's how the military and law forces disarm bombs, by shooting them. In most cases bombs are shoddily made, sometimes detonating on accident at random or even being garbage that you could disable by a rock toss. If the bomb is placed in an area safe from collateral damage like roads or buildings that are already damaged, they dont risk human life or expensive robots to disarm them, and just open fire. They do disarm them with those options, but only in cases where its impossible or risky to shoot the damn thing.
@@jacobhinton6178 I can understand bomb disposal via gunfire: I've seen it done with a .50-caliber rifle. But that's because they can shoot it from far away. Even a small bomb has a greater explosive radius than a .22 pistol. Doesn't seem like a good idea to save a few pennies on a bullet that puts you in harm's range.
@@gastonbell108 Heh, no it does not. I don't think that would ever be viable.
@@gastonbell108 .22s go farther than you seem to think. This gun sucks ass, but with a Ruger 1022 or something I see no problem
RUclips recommended me this and "homer designs a car" at the same time. They seem appropriate, together.
Magnum_koichi seems to think so
@@a.hollins8691 IF it fires
lol
It'd be better if the third recommendation was a video about the Pontiac Aztek.
@@marthaindahouse1010 The 4th video was about the Sega 32x
When I was a kid, “zip gun” was a slang term for a homemade.22 where a round was fired through a tube, attached to a piece of wood, using little more than a rubber band and a nail.
You'd probably get better performance out of that tbh
@@masonsykes2240 Probably would be a little safer too.
How to make a hi point look like an engineering masterpiece.
Alex Jongenelen yeah go check demolition ranches hi-point videos and you will see
@@Creamer305 Where he calls hi points terrible 15x a video, yet shows how indestructible and very reliable they are.
It is it’s very reliable but it’s really ugly
hahahahhahahahah
What the hell is with the hate with the hi point? It’s ugly, sure but it is reliable
Doug was a member at our gun club. He filmed the shooting portions of his advertisements there. The one time I met him, he let me shoot Zip Gun serial #1; he was so proud of it and that example was 100% reliable, even with garbage ammo. I feel bad saying it (because he is a really nice guy) but I’ve probably shot the only reliable zip gun.
Wax Pragmatic
I wonder what was changed from the prototype. I held one and just couldn't get passed sweeping my hand to charge it.
Did you even listen it's meant to be under barell mounted for reasons that make no sense.
Well, I'm one of the few who have liked this thing ever since it came out. Because of its simplicity. I like simplicity. Ian points out an important fact though - which is what others have noticed as well. Simple fix is: getting a stronger spring. That's all! A harder spring and the gun works flawlessly every time (otherwise it is prone to jamming). So in the original gun the creator probably had a heavier spring. Someone thought they'd skimp on a smaller spring, which made the gun jam on almost every round. Search for zip 22 spring, here on youtube and you'll see a totally different gun - from just such a small and simple fix.
Curious. What makes this "simple." Looks complex as hell to me; and dangerous. If I just picked one up, I would have NO IDEA how to charge a round or take it apart. It took Ian 10 minutes to take it apart and I counted 18 parts on a basic dis-assembly!!!!
Charles McKinley I’ve always assumed the one I shot was reliable because it was hand made and had many hours of hand tuning as part of development.
Let's make a safe gun! **puts charger next to muzzle**
It's not safe until you blow all your fingers off... because then you can't pull the trigger anymore
Enkarashaddam I mean.... you are technically correct
@@Feeshyenjoyer yeah, how can a company design an atrocity like that.
I have more faith in my nerf guns then that abomination
Yeah, but if the gun fails to load, you could have to operate the charger with your eye by looking down the barrel, this point is moot.
They could've outsourced it to Keltec and they would've somehow made it not only good but successful because they're the only ones that can make weird shit and get away with it
I love that Keltec's whole market is basically making weird guns that make people go "That's really bizzare... I want one." Lol
That is the ugliest, non-ergonomic, complicated P.O.S. I've ever seen. And I see myself in the mirror everyday. I'd honestly rather carry a brick.
Only person who can kill with this gun is John Wick.
Dragonictus He’d just throw the fucking thing like he does props in the movie. Why even try and shoot the thing?
What do you mean? While carrying a Zip22, you already are carrying a brick.
You didn't have to kill yourself like that OP
that was just a kamikaze attack with words
Remember when you were a kid and pretended your TV remote was a gun... thats what this reminds me of
shit im 22 and i still like to pretend my tv remote is an m1911
Hahahahahahaha I wish I can like this 1000 times😂
@@richie_23 If you put fresh batteries in it, it would become a reliable handgun. ;)
It'd be a more effective handgun than this.
My grandparents had a TV remote that had a distinct curve to it and I would always hold it like a sawed off
"It's the world's safest pistol!"
How do you charge it?
"You put your hand in front of the barrel!"
If I recall correctly when they were marketing this I think you were supposed to use those charging handles against the edge of a table.
I don't remember where I heard that but I'm pretty sure I heard that from someone back when they were originally making this I really wanted one of them I thought it was the neatest thing ever but alas I wasn't 21 yet.
@Roderick storey Hey, you don't have to point it down you can always push it against the edge of the table keeping it horizontal.
So you accidentally shoot your friend in the spleen instead.
Okay, I'm not saying it was a good idea or good design, it was just *neat* okay.
"It's the world's safest pistol!"
How is that possible?
"It almost never fires when you pull the trigger!"
Climb carefully down off that high horse (wouldn't want you to die in such a fall) and think about what you said for just a second:
How safe is it? Being unloaded, perfectly safe. Hand in front of the barrel, whatever, it's NOT YET CHARGED!
MEANWHILE, millions of Appendix Carry evangelicals are walking around with Glocks, Sigs, and XDs loaded, pointed at their cocks all day, saying 4 O'Clock IWB is wrong and unsafe. There's dumb bumblefucks posing as experts all over, it's an infinite resource.
It's not untrue he'll most don't fire lol
As someone who’s owned a few of these.
the reason they were so bad is because the return spring was very weak, causing the gun to not eject the rounds, but after purchasing an upgrade spring and oiling the firearm up it runs flawlessly. If you have one and want it to run better, replace the trigger spring and the trigger and the return spring
a forgotten weapon 3 years after it's productionrun..that must be a record.
Seriously I was amazed this is up but damn this is dumb!
Naw, SigSauer holds the record. I shot one once and immediately went blah, ick, and forgot about ever buying one. Their proportions are weird. Don't like the angles. It's why I bought an HK.
kiekert2007 you’re forgetting the Chippa Triple Threat.
@@RobertMorgan when you call one of the biggest gun companies a "forgotten weapon"
Unless you play phantom forces on roblox
Literally the only automatic pistol you can play russian roulette with
This is genius
@@jaymethodus3421 Yeah but don't try it
Maybe i already did. Never know with a gun like this
Methodist first shot tends to be 90 percent more lethal
So true haha
Most guns kill animals or other humans
but this one singlehandedly killed an entire company...
When your new gun kills the whole company without firing a single round, you *know* that's serious firepower :)
How is there not more thumbs up on this comment. That was good.
This gun is, most likely, still killing owners and passersby regularly. That being said it has probably saved a lot of people with failures. Jamming and the like.
@@devilsoffspring5519
In this instance it's more likely a lack of firepower that did.
@[ Soviet Maverick ]
I know how to take a joke. I replied with one. I was surprised that someone missed it. ;)
The main safety feature is.... if you're opponent gets ahold of your weapon, they won't be able to use it against you. While they're trying to figure that out, you're going to have a lot of time to run away. And you're going to want to run away out of embarrassment.
It has to be the safest gun in the world if it doesn't work.
Not safe at all in a selfdefense situation.
@@failer_ the their would laugh himself to death. Effective
The problem is, it doesn't not work reliably either.
Craig Stewart For firearm laws, I presume.
exactly lol
*find himself in a shootout*
*sees a .22 zip and a wooden plank on the ground*
**picks the plank**
Picks up gun hits it like a baseball with the plank
When the other person is out of ammo id throw the zip at him and say "here use this" then id proceed to beat him with the plank because he cant get the zip to fire.
Of course you pick the plank, everyone knows how to use a plank than that zip gun lol...
*Picks up Richard Mask*
HM2 reference
I'd still use the zip. But only two shots then I would use the second bullet toy head lol
Usfa: “will be the safest gun on the planet”
Also usfa: *forces you to put your hands next to the muzzle*
mechanical safety vs operational safety, I'm assuming. I'm far from an expert (being Dutch, gun control is very tight so the only guns I see are the ones on the other side of my pc screen), but it's technically not wrong if it won't accidentally discharge.
@@Ignisami Yup safe in theory, but once again they failed to properly design the monkey interface
You can push the charge handles back with the edge of a table
Than no fingers will be near the muzzle and the muzzle will be safely pointed to the floor.
Everyone would know that if they read the instructions.
@@billbailey55 that sounds great, pushing the muzzle of a loaded gun against the edge of a table
@@billbailey55 I'm not seeing it in the instruction manual
www.all4shooters.com/en/shooting/pistols/usfa-zip22-modular-pistol/zipoperatormanualwebedition.pdf
the zippy was so beloved they made it into a real thing
Gotta get it from the slot machine.
Halfway into disassembly I was waiting for Ian to start dropping parts into a trash can lol.
i would have actually just died if he did so lol
"It's midnight how are we planning on robbing this jewelry store?"
*holds up zip gun*
"Oh?"
*throws it through a window*
"Oh."
It would probably bounce off the window and come back and hit the thief.
@@IRCannonFodder the gun MYSTERIOUSLY discharges and the bullet hits an explosive barrel and kills the thief and his team
so I cant even throw the weapon without problems.
"The whole thing just fizzled up and blew away like dust."
Mr. Gun Jesus, I don't feel so good...
If only he had gone one step further... and said... "dust in the wind"
Too soon
Beat me to it, Michael...
I remember having a nerf pistol that attached to the rail sections of some other nerf guns. It actually shot reliably though, so I guess it's not that similar.
Gotta love how the manual looks like one for a PS1 game, right down to the terrible t-shirts at the end.
I knew the format reminded me of something.
Yeah.. it was kinda vitreolic. And well earned.
Looking at the design, it looks like you reload it by throwing it at your enemy after which it explodes and magicaly reconstructs itself in your hands.
We call this the baby maker Jr
Tediore guns are fun!
Glat to see i'm not the only one who thought that LOL
The ammo cost gets out of hand though when you realise the more ammo you have the more damage it does
tediore guns lmfao
After this, I don't want to hear ANYONE complain about bench stripping a Hi-Point! This thing is a lawsuit in a box that would feed a lawyer and his family for several years!
“How to pay off law school in one easy case!”
*The Career Catalyst*
Hi point still ugly as hell I just hate how it's as reliable as a fucking AK 47 I can cook the thing into a brownie and still fire it run it over with my car and still fire it it'll still fire even after I shoot it just makes it harder to slide the weapons slide and load the next round to fire it again.
For some reason, I thought it'd be a lot bigger. I absolutely lost it when he inserted the extended mag into it though, and even moreso when I saw the photo of it being mounted to another gun.
USFA: "the .22 is a less than lethal round"
I'm having a hard time imagining the reactions of the legal teams for Remmington or Colt after hearing that. I imagine uncontrollable laughter followed by panic.
perhaps followed by a slight feeling of discomfort from all that water gushing out from their noses
oh cmon, 22 is overrated
While .22 can be lethal, it is not relyably so.
@@ineednochannelyoutube5384 the only 22 i trust is a g22 lol
The term you're looking for is "horror laugh".
How could it be possible to know enough about firearms to design this and not know enough too see the most hysterically obvious flaws?
a legit good question, but also fairly simple to answer. they never spent enough time testing the basic design to figure out those problems i don't think.
It is a jagged brick with no way to hold! Why!!?
This looks like a Kickstarter scam, to be honest.
greed
no internet back then
I'm pretty sure a Nerf Kronos has more stopping power than this.
Mostly because the Nerf gun will actually fire.
Fucking hell the Deploy is more reliable than this waste of resources.
@@brandonvelde5774 both of my deploys are reliable and by default both are automatically more reliable than this gun.
A rock is more reliable.
but to carry a full mag of rocks weights alot.
A nerf sword has more stopping power that this piece of shit
Well at least Nerfs are very reliable lol
US Firearms sold their single action revolver machinery to Standard Manufacturing in New Britain, Ct. Standard has been making the SAA ever since and it’s quality exceeds the original Colts. They all come with a case/hardened frame. I just got mine and it’s fantastic.
Hey it’s the gun I drew in people’s hands as a 7 year old
@Stop Banningme ouch
@Stop Banningme 😎😋
7 yr old's fantasy aka preppers
@Old-Dirty-Glove ok boomer
I will never gripe about field-stripping my 1911 ever again.
Me at the beginning of the video: "Dang Ian.. take it easy on the pistol."
Me after five minutes: "Oh."
After watching his attempts to fire it: “Ooooohhhhhh.”
I love how blunt he is about how much of a turd this gun is.
The one thing he likes is the wrench
Right? Did they decide once it was done to put the safety tape designs on it or what. Absolutely horrible. Someone mixed up the votes on design and picked the box with the NO votes and viola.
@@Fister_of_Muppets what else did you expect from a gun that looks like something master chief would use ?
I want nothing more in this life than to be a “zip operator”.
Do it
"Hmm, you know what my brand new FN SCAR-H needs? An under barrel .22 pistol that jams every other round! Perfect! Unstoppable!"
You're forgetting the ability to "inspect" possible package bombs with .22LR fire.... from upwards of 5 to 10 feet away! .... It's DIY bomb disposal for the soldier with only pennies to spend. What's not to love?
@@Gj23jk2 UNcle was a EOD, he told me that they disposed of any suspected IED with a .50BMG round from a barrett
@@johnbacon4997 true, but they do it from half a mile away (behind a sandbag wall)
@@Gj23jk2 yep
The game ‘Cruelty Squad’ has this gun as a secret weapon.
And yes, it’s prone to failure lol.
There's a 1/3 chance it does nothing another third it hurts you and a final third that it actually shoots
Zippy 3000. Spent a solid 2 hours in front of that damn slot machine. I knew it was garbage but still got excited when it finally dropped. Then the joy quickly faded when I found out just how garbage it actually is.
@@junioraltamontent.7582 Forgotten Weapons has a review of the gun here on RUclips.
@@gestaposantaclaus can I get a link to that?
@@danialyousaf6456 which video? You didn't post a link
“I’m gonna fire it till it jams”, jams before even shooting
So basically the only way to hold this thing correctly is if you had hands like an Elite from Halo.
Yes
They even failed in the naming by calling their firearm after the term for a crude homemade pistol. It's like Ford releasing a new model and calling it the Ford Jalopy.
I feel like it looks like 1.
The Ford Jalopy better look like a 60’s muscle car.
It's like a gun designed by someone who had never seen a handgun before. Or even a human hand.
They were blind their whole lives, spun around for 16 hours on a centrifuge, and asked to draw a staple gun immediately after.
This is the Windows 10 of guns ^^
Or even a human hand hahahahah good one 👍
I like the idea behind this gun. A sleek, ergonomic design that literally fits in your pocket (unlike other guns what make that claim). If they'd spent more time on design, it probably would have become a new standard for handguns.
Nintendo gun
This looks like something a detective would use in some distopian cyberpunk film
Something you can buy from a vending machine
More like a mockbuster version of some distopian cyberpunk film.
"Scissor Runner", "Mechacop", "Meg Tropolis"
That's what I was thinking lol
Classic Deus Ex reference?
@@schwarzerritter5724 "Johnny Remember "
Yoooo it's the thingamajig from Cruelty Squad
I remember when this gun came out someone posted "this is going to be the newest gun on Forgotten Weapons." I'm impressed.
“This is the world safest fire-arm!” *gets hit in the hand with the ejecting shell..
/then accidentally shoots finger off while charging the gun
it's the safest for whoever you're aiming at
To be fair, the gun would need to be able to fire for that to happen.
Should put arm in caps or indicated like *arms* to make the pun funnier
well seeing as its one of few that probably has never killed anyone I guess in a weird way you can say it did actually fulfil that.
The most interesting thing about it is that it was made in 2013. When I first saw it, I thought it was some hair-brained eccentric's idea from the 1970s, trying to invent the gun of the future.
I thought that till the end of the video.
wait....you serious??? lemme do some research daaammm....i thought it was some 70s-80s weirdass idea
That's exactly what I thought. I can't believe it's so new.
The guy who designed/invented this, was probably hoping that if, the Obama administration, pushed very for gun control, he could sell this to them, as the "safe alternative, common sense, gun". Ya know, The Biden Gun"
To be fair, it is the same year dubstep was popular.
If you used a picatinny on one, and then a reverse picatinny on a second one, could you mount two Zip 22's onto each other? Because that's kind of hilarious
Oh no, you made me imagine that
Ok now this is a gun I had legitimately forgot about.
Lucky you, maybe you will again.
I had never even heard of it.
Here is to hoping you again lapse the memory of this hideous contraption.
I was completely unaware
Doug Donnelly was so happy to find his half brother from Springfield he let him design a gun.
The company I worked for was contracted by him to build the guns and so many times we tried to give suggestions to make it better but Doug was to hard headed with his big head
Watching this I thought, "Oh, well this seems like a wild initiative by someone in the 80's. Looks like it fits in an episode of Airwolf or something." Never would I have guessed it's a gun from the 2010's. At most early 1990's.
wait what this was the 2010's? i thought this was like late 90s to early 2000's
@@WellCookedPotatoes At the very least Amazon needed to be a thing for it to sell accessories through it, so assumingly mid 2000s.
If by early 1990's you mean one of those "SpyGear" toys, then yes, I agree
especially with that manual it came with
It's like the odd guns that appeared during the Clinton gun ban years - the lightweight AR pistols, the Crossfire rifle/shotgun, the pump action rifles etc. But from the 2010s.
This really takes "Remember, switching to your pistol is always faster than reloading" to a whole new level
I get it. I don't want to get it, but I get it. That 'under barrel' ZIPSBR(tm) was the whole intended purpose for the firearm. Every design point is intended for the firearm to be mounted under a rifle. Right handed ejection to stay away from left handed support hand. Funky grip that would work 'well' as an AFG. Blocky rear section to mate to a magwell like the rear of a 203. Forward charging... pegs? Protrusions? Whatever you want to call those so that it wouldn't interfere with your grip using it as an AFG. I'd bet money that USFA designed this to be used in military/police functions, got laughed at; then sold it to civilian markets. It's so much funnier to me now knowing that they tried to play Operator and failed so hard to run their whole company into the ground.
That seems to make a lot of since.
I think you're onto something.
SunsetSpecter that's as good a theory as any I guess.
I don't know a lot about what's most tactical to add to an assault rifle, but my guess is something more powerful or more close-combat would be the most common choice, like a grenade launcher or a shotgun, or even a bayonet. A .22 seems useful to me only if you find some rodent you need to kill along the way.
@@iomeliora9430 I mean the argument isn't that it wss a good idea ahaha
Watched this video multiple times. I came to a conclusion that this gun was designed for a left handed carpenter who lost his index finger and his pinky. And in that sense it's genious.
As a carpenter this shit is funny as hell
Its fitting that the trigger finger most optimal with this gun is the middle finger.
Jesus Gun!???
And also had no will to actually shoot anything
So if Battlefield makes another game set in the present day (or, God help us, a Hardline 2), they should absolutely make this the joke pistol in the same vein of the Kolibri and the Liberator.
this would be like picking a Russian roulette gun , sometimes it shoots sometimes you have to throw it at people because it jammed.
The liberator was actually useful though. It was a disposable single shot to ambush with. It's not a gun you use to win a battle, it's a gun you use to get a better gun off some poor, hapless bastard who was just out on patrol.
@@wolfehoffmann2697 The Zip's useful too. You point it at your enemy, and then switch to your actual sidearm and gun him down while he's doubled over laughing.
ZERO94AIC Yes of course, everyone is born knowing that exact fact about that exact gun. It'd be weird if you didn't know it...
@@rav3727 fellow robloxian lmao
Judging by how USFA designed this weapon, and the sacrifices that were made for it, seems that the creator's vision of the gun was to drive his own company into the ground rather than actually design a cheap weapon that could be easily manufactured.
“Consider it a less lethal cartridge...”
Uh, they fucking printed that?! Who was their lawyer?
Joe Biden, maybe?
Do not question the incredible stupidity of Doug Donnelly
22 is more lethal than 45 and 9mm, it bounces around inside of you and destroys bone and tissue.
I think the Israelis were trying that same tactic, using Ruger 10/22s as “less lethal” crowd control snipers. It didn’t end well then, either.
Maybe it was meant for angry dogs
Douglas Donnelly was an orphan, and finally found his long-lost brother. Then he let his brother design his company's new gun. Now he is homeless.
Douglas "Herb" Donnelly?
Uncy Herb..
😂superb reference
I immediately scrolled to the comments to see how many people made a Homer joke, I wasn't disappointed
Pretty sure Homer got the idea to mount it to a carbine from Moe too.
"How do you hold this thing?"
"That's the neat part, you don't!"
The single worst starting point for a handgun: How do you even hold it?
I found your video through a forum thread about horrible business decisions. Really, really good. I swear this thing looks like it should be in a bad sci-fi movie.
"Less comfortable than a two by four" I bet it's also less useful than a two by four.
The Black Baron using a 2x4 as a bat is more effective is more effective
A two by four is a devastatingly potent weapon. The Zip 22 is also devastatingly potent, but to its users.
A 2x4 probably has a better range
“Some people I’ve spoken to prefer to hold it like this” Ian... when your friends have spent enough time with one of these to give you tips you need new friends. Friends don’t let friends Zip 22
😂
KEL TEC: we designed a gun that people could easily shoot their hand with.
USFA: hold my drink...
Hey, with the Grendel P10 you can at least have a driveby.
3of11 We need a hold my avocado.
15:23 I don’t know why but that little high pitch noise made me smile.
I don’t know if it’s knowing that feeling of nearly loosing something or just the noise itself.
Cause you're gay
Remarkable. Somehow ZIP managed to take the best .22 lr magazine ever designed, and inspiration from the Mk3 firing pin return spring for use as their striker spring and somehow build a gun that doesn't work around them. That takes tallent.
I wonder if you could slow the action enough to make it feed more reliably if you handed the bolt to a machine shop and had one CNC milled from aluminum or steel (or even SMS 3D printed) to give it enough mass that it takes more time to cycle, or whether that would add enough weight that the 22LR cartridge wouldn't be able to push the bolt back far enough.
@@seanmalloy7249 wow I was thinking of the same thing, to add to that. I was thinking that by it being made out of metal, it could also be milled to include a simple extractor and ejector to better hold the round and eject the casing. due to how thick it is.
Ruger rotary magazine is hardly the best ever designed, far from it
Honestly, I can see myself unscrewing it from my carbine in middle of reload and throwing it on perpetrator to End Them Rightly™.
Skall would be proud.
This gun the poacher gun the AK47 thingy.
With how little it works, it may as well be a pommel :/
in theory, you could put 2 of these on top of one another with the reverse rail
Yo dawg, I heard you like jams, so we put a Zip on your Zip so you can jam while you jam!
You may have discovered the only way to make this thing even harder to shoot. I'm impressed.
Didn't they have a rail under the barrel as well ? You could build up an infinite stack of these.
That's how you correctly dual wield the Zip. You screw them onto each other.
I’ve heard the Vatican has had the rail mounts for the Zip’s taken off the market and locked in their Vault. As two Zips Connected together and firing both resulting in an “Über Jam” and thus beginning the chain of events that leads to the end of mankind.
I will shamelessly admit ive re-watched this 6 times. This is one of the best forgotten weapons videos ever.