@@victorherrero4790 the stability in highway is nightmare you cant never ever take your hand from sterring at speed 65 mph you need to correct the steering every miliseconds, AC system very weak in the summer and I already changed evaporater last few months that cost $700 and engine leaks that cost $2000 for fixing, now wheel bearing with others issue
I have a 2015 Forester, it is surprisingly stable. Even disabled the stability control as a test in a snowy parking lot and still had to really work to get it to slide. Didn't even have snow tires on it at the time either.
A big bonus of the Boxer engine - the engine sits very low in the car & has a low center of gravity. The "symmetrical AWD" that Subaru advertises does have benefits in these kinds of extreme handling conditions.
Subaru cars are the best bang for your bucks. They are only second to Volvo in safety, will last 400k miles easily, have almost every features in other cars that have double or even triple price tag, and when it's snowing hard, some Subaru models are the real snow mobiles. You can't go wrong choosing Subaru.
@@Purple-f6d for safety Subaru suffering from slow response of safety system that eyesight cant keep up with road condition as fast as it should. From my experience if you drive Subaru and you hqve been surrounding by 3 cars one in front of you and the rest in the right and left the eyesight system will start glitch and won't response quickly. For snow climate it's not a secret in this days every car with AWD and snow tyres can keep up without issue. CVT classified as one of worst CVT in the road it's not refined as it should if you compare it with Nissan, Hyundai CVT transmission. In Subaru it's jerking hesitation and vibration with loud noise while acceleration 😡 and needs 10 Liters for full flashing every 40,000 km which is expensive
@ It’s surprising no auto reviews talk about this side of subaru. What’s you opinion on Volvo ex90 and the overall declining reliability of Volvo cars?
@Purple-f6d see I was going to buy S60 2022 with low mileage like 3k only from dealer when I drove it something strange happened while flooring acceleration paddle the transmission will cut engine power just like manual transmission while shifting and push clutch paddle 🤔. For reliability I don't trust Volo also 😅.
@@tafdiz I used them quite a long time and i think that i have enough experience. These tyres are very noisy and hard compound tires. However despite being hard compound, it's not grippy. I don't expect to stick like michelin pilot sports. But these do not behaving like performance summer tires in either cold or heat.
@@tafdiz FYI this model in North American markets came with the Bridgestone Dueller H/L. That's a garbage light truck/SUV tire. I had the slightly sportier Dueller on my Outback and it was still absolute dog shit. I put Pirelli UHP all seasons on and it made the big wagon fun to drive. Bottom line, no it does not. It comes with bargain basement shitty comfort tires.
The first attempt is the most significant, because on an open road, we all have to go by this "first time" and the question is how many of us will have the opportunity to try a second time...
@@goldorak3251 not sure, you don't need to face it to sense and feel the car, steering, feedback, suspension, etc...you just need to drive and feel it, get use to it and you will be able to handle much more than the first day driving it.
Esta prueba la tienen q hacer con personas q no sepan tener esas sensaciones del ABS controles de estabilidad y demás en una palabra q no tengan ni idea de esquivar algo en un posible accidente
I have all gen 3 to 5 Gen 3 most fun, raw and aggressive Gen 4 most balanced , last gen with turbo , best daily use car Gen 5 boreding ( under power ) but safe and comfortable for long trips
@@emeryguo5158 or if you ever tried the 5.9 sec 0-60m on gen 3 , 7ish sec on gen 4 , and 10sec+ on gen 5, then you will have a very different view on the meaning of under power 🤣 The Gen 5 even I keep 6k rmp , but till hardly make an over take on highway 😅
@@emeryguo5158 I would say we have different standards , on rolling acceleration this N/A engine is even worst then the turbo 😅 The turbo lag might be 1 seconds , but the rmp lag is around 3 seconds after your floor it . Of course any car can over take , but just how fast and safe u can do it comfortably
@@ylfyg I see what you mean, turbo kicks in at low rpm, while na reach max power in high revs. But you can always down shift to get power, especially on highways, 3rd gear gets you up to 140 kph. Personally I think this engine is powerful enough, I often rev it to the max power, like driving 60 kph in 2nd gear🤣.
Pretty sure using a proper summer tyres of goodyear\pirelli\continental level would yield a much better result, as we can see the limiting factor there is sideways sliding due to default all-season bridgestone tyres installed on this vehicle (they are pretty mediocre).
@@EdwardZLiu Forester is 1.73m vs 1.64m of the 5008, that is 9cm taller (height). It has also 3cm more of ground clearance (220mm vs 191mm). So, pretty obvious that the Forester was bit slower...
Con terreno seco no va mal aunque hay que pensarlo dos veces antes de adelantar, pero en mojado con los MS de serie va fatal, digan lo que digan, parece que vayas patinando
El problema es que el conductor normal desconoce cual será la reacción de los coches tal y como les ocurre a ustedes generalmente. No habrá segunda oportunidad para corregir. Actúa con seguridad el coche o no lo hace, punto.
Por eso es tan importante aprender a conocer el auto que tenemos, cualquiera que este sea, tratar de probar el auto en ambientes seguros para conocer sus reacciones. 👌🏻👌🏻🤓
@@benjamincaceres1524 Muy pocas personas lo hacemos y se lo digo con mi experiencia de más de 35 años en emergencias. Una vez un millonario me dijo que su 4x4 tenía que sacarlo sin tantas tonterías y tuve que enseñarle en medio de una laguna causada por las lluvias que era low y high range.
🤑Even with +10% price range of SUV And there will be no better : Stability in turning then boxer engine Performance in off road then Xmode Driving Assistance then eyesight Acceleration then the XT AWD Driving View with the giant screen But almost anyone can beat Forester on on fuel Exterior looking and interior design Cheaper parts ( but they don't need replacing anyway )
@@Away907 well I am not sure what you on about crv is on CVT too 😅 and yes cx5 can gives you up to 400 ish nm , but only the 2.5L turbo version or gls , which Subaru's CVT deliver upto 350 nm, and beat the rest models. the 6speed AT will never as comfortable as CVT on daily driving , in the speaking off off road system we should both know the difference with all time AWD . Anyway after all these years for real off road funs , merz are still the best somthing that BMW or Maserati can't do 🤣
@@Away907 Just saw the Tiguan test, and it was way worse than the Forester. It was actually abysmal, the car started jumping as crazy. The CX-5 has exactly the same result (with lower clearance and worse offroad capabilities).
Teknikens Varld argues that roads can’t be resized. OK, so do all moose appear at identical width Swedish rural roads then? There’s a reason why international ISO standards are adopted. More importantly, the ISO 3888-2 requires tests to be repeated in both steering directions, which the Swedish publication don’t do. Surely moose don’t appear in just one direction right?
Does anyone else get the feeling that OEM's are rated on a scale of safety based on how much they pay to safety companies? That was abysmal, yet it's praised as being controllable and safe.
This is due to poor design by Subaru. There is a steering shaft isolator made of rubber that creates a lot of understeer. Many companies make parts to fix this issue such as PERRIN Steering Dampener Lockdown Kit. I have a Forester that had major understeer issues driving hard and i did this mod and it made the vehicle handle 100X better.
In older models you could just install the steering linkage used on an sti. It didn't have the rubber damper. Just a solid metal shaft. I've done it on multiple cars. Definitely makes for a more confident on-center feel and crisper steering response instead of feeling like steering through sand sometimes. But I'm not sure how this would affect understeer. That rubber damper would certainly numb steering feel and dampen a bit of responsiveness, but ultimately understeer is safer than oversteer so engineers design it into the suspension. Locking out the steering damper may have just given you better feel of what was going on at the wheels so you could drive the car more precisely. I doubt it actually changed the dynamics of the car at all.
Con terreno seco no va mal aunque hay que pensárselo dos veces antes de adelantar, pero en mojado, al menos con los neumáticos MS de serie va fatal...a pesar de lo que digan
Con terreno seco no va mal aunque hay que pensarlo dos veces antes de adelantar, pero en mojado con los MS de serie va fatal, digan lo que digan, parece que vayas patinando
@@4rojo618 Los neumaticos de serie siempre van fatal no importa el coche,eso es una constante a los pocos kilometros lo mejor es cambiarlos. Yo al mío le monté las yokohama geolandar M+S (de serie llevaba las geolandar normales ) y es allí en donde noté la diferencia el agarre en pavimento mojado es impresionante.
@@Jb74W No es por polemizar pero yo nunca he cambiado los neumáticos de serie del coche hasta que no han estado ya agotados, viajando por trabajo haciendo 40.000 kms/año durante más de 25 años consecutivos...Es decir que si realmente los de serie de este modelo son malos, que los pongan mejores, digo yo, no?
Es el futuro, la demanda por las anticuadas cajas manuales va en retroceso, Subaru las dejo de ofrecer ya que más del 85% de sus ventas eran vehículos automáticos, no es rentable tener cadena de producción para caja manual en paralelo.
@@sergeipelissier5690 En muchos casos lo que se le pide a la caja automática es que sea tan buena como la manual , las cvt sirven para ciclomotores y poco más y limitan mucho al conjunto del vehículo y motor. No creo que ninguna cvt de las que usa Subaru mejore a las cajas manuales que equipaban sus coches hace 15 años. Creo que va todo en la línea de ahorrar costes y ofrecen en Europa lo mismo que en EEUU. Vería más lógico que comercialicen menos vehículos pero que cumplan con la tendencia Europea. Si las marcas comienzan a promover los cambios automáticos es porque les conviene a ellos y porque han visto que a muchos usuarios les da igual ( ya sea por desconocimiento o lo que sea) . Donde esté una buena caja manual que se quite cualquier caja automática. Y si no que de lo digan a Honda. >.
77kmh en un SUV con unas bridgestone dueler, pero luego un golf 8 pasa a menos de 70 y la culpa es de unas bridgestone turanza con un cuarto del perfil de estas.
@@AntonioMartinez-xt7gg no es si es torpe o que. Tampoco se que chasis es mas agil. Lo que tengo claro es que el esp del golf funciona mal. Pero no mal de peor que otros, mal de mal, de defectuoso.
Me refería al forester, se ha comentado de él que es torpe. El golf tendria que ser una referencia y rodar mas que bien. Hay demasiada prisa por sacar modelos cada 6 meses.
This test is also interesting, so why not try to imitate it? ruclips.net/video/csy7V35p3IY/видео.html The tester is Kazuo Shimizu, a famous Japanese rally driver and motor journalist.
La Forester tiene 22 cm de altura libre del suelo la de un Todo Terreno y el XTrail , la de un automóvil y pega hasta en un reductor de velocidad de velocidad Por eso nunca llegarás con un XTrail donde llega una Forester
The best overall SUV. Subaru without a doubt is the most underrated brand in the market.
Agreed
one of worst car in the market
@@sayedengine why?! Cuz you say so?
@@victorherrero4790Because I own one 😂It's really shiit
@@victorherrero4790 the stability in highway is nightmare you cant never ever take your hand from sterring at speed 65 mph you need to correct the steering every miliseconds, AC system very weak in the summer and I already changed evaporater last few months that cost $700 and engine leaks that cost $2000 for fixing, now wheel bearing with others issue
Subaru de las pocas marcas que pagas lo que vale 💙
I have a 2015 Forester, it is surprisingly stable. Even disabled the stability control as a test in a snowy parking lot and still had to really work to get it to slide. Didn't even have snow tires on it at the time either.
A big bonus of the Boxer engine - the engine sits very low in the car & has a low center of gravity. The "symmetrical AWD" that Subaru advertises does have benefits in these kinds of extreme handling conditions.
Subaru cars are the best bang for your bucks. They are only second to Volvo in safety, will last 400k miles easily, have almost every features in other cars that have double or even triple price tag, and when it's snowing hard, some Subaru models are the real snow mobiles. You can't go wrong choosing Subaru.
they are rubbish
@@sayedenginewhy?
@@Purple-f6d for safety Subaru suffering from slow response of safety system that eyesight cant keep up with road condition as fast as it should. From my experience if you drive Subaru and you hqve been surrounding by 3 cars one in front of you and the rest in the right and left the eyesight system will start glitch and won't response quickly. For snow climate it's not a secret in this days every car with AWD and snow tyres can keep up without issue.
CVT classified as one of worst CVT in the road it's not refined as it should if you compare it with Nissan, Hyundai CVT transmission. In Subaru it's jerking hesitation and vibration with loud noise while acceleration 😡 and needs 10 Liters for full flashing every 40,000 km which is expensive
@ It’s surprising no auto reviews talk about this side of subaru. What’s you opinion on Volvo ex90 and the overall declining reliability of Volvo cars?
@Purple-f6d see I was going to buy S60 2022 with low mileage like 3k only from dealer when I drove it something strange happened while flooring acceleration paddle the transmission will cut engine power just like manual transmission while shifting and push clutch paddle 🤔. For reliability I don't trust Volo also 😅.
A low center of gravity is what makes it that good on the road. I like my Forester so much ;)
"Run, Forester, Run!"
I'll walk myself out.
Unexpected but more than welcome results from this Subaru Forester
Excelente vehículo....I love forester !!! Saludos 🇨🇱
Subaru es a otro nivel
Ya quisieran muchas marcas hacer lo que Subaru hace. Ahí es donde los diseños y las pantallitas de las otras marcas quedan obsoletas.
Dueler all terrain tyres are the limiting factor here.
@@tafdiz I used them quite a long time and i think that i have enough experience. These tyres are very noisy and hard compound tires. However despite being hard compound, it's not grippy. I don't expect to stick like michelin pilot sports. But these do not behaving like performance summer tires in either cold or heat.
@@tafdiz what tires do you think this model comes with?
@@tafdiz FYI this model in North American markets came with the Bridgestone Dueller H/L.
That's a garbage light truck/SUV tire. I had the slightly sportier Dueller on my Outback and it was still absolute dog shit. I put Pirelli UHP all seasons on and it made the big wagon fun to drive.
Bottom line, no it does not. It comes with bargain basement shitty comfort tires.
Considering the tyres (brand and size) and the vehicle class itself, that was not bad at all
Excelente una prueba de seguridad con el conductor sin casco y sin cinturóon de seguridad.
Xd
Subaru Forester ..amazing for tall suv. Thumbs up
Much better that the new Golf 😂😂😂
yes
Symmetrical all wheel drive beats everything in the moose test, change my mind
do a WRX and WRX STI test, and Forester SJ XT, please!
Muy esperado resultado. Cuando te preocupas por hacer un auto de verdad y no un juguetito con chiches y pantallas que nunca vas a utilizar de diario.
Para ser un suv de 1700kg y muy elevado es un muy buen resultado, menos mal que es torpe....
Es mejor que muchos turismos como el mercedes amg A45
Vw tiguan 🤣
Да, он тяжелее будет и по этому хуже проходит и прыгает
The first attempt is the most significant, because on an open road, we all have to go by this "first time" and the question is how many of us will have the opportunity to try a second time...
First attempt is when driver is not familiar with car.
But if driver has owned the car some time, he would be familiar and fare better
@@rlong749 You will not be familiar with this type of situation until you face it.
@@goldorak3251 not sure, you don't need to face it to sense and feel the car, steering, feedback, suspension, etc...you just need to drive and feel it, get use to it and you will be able to handle much more than the first day driving it.
@@subazealand9158 If you are not sure, just believe me. ;-)
Esta prueba la tienen q hacer con personas q no sepan tener esas sensaciones del ABS controles de estabilidad y demás en una palabra q no tengan ni idea de esquivar algo en un posible accidente
I have all gen 3 to 5
Gen 3 most fun, raw and aggressive
Gen 4 most balanced , last gen with turbo , best daily use car
Gen 5 boreding ( under power ) but safe and comfortable for long trips
If you use paddle shifters to keep the rev around 4000, i feel that gen 5 is never underpowered
@@emeryguo5158 or if you ever tried the 5.9 sec 0-60m on gen 3 , 7ish sec on gen 4 , and 10sec+ on gen 5, then you will have a very different view on the meaning of under power 🤣
The Gen 5 even I keep 6k rmp , but till hardly make an over take on highway 😅
@@ylfyg I got my 0-60 around 8 sec, why is it hard to overtake on highways?
@@emeryguo5158 I would say we have different standards , on rolling acceleration this N/A engine is even worst then the turbo 😅
The turbo lag might be 1 seconds , but the rmp lag is around 3 seconds after your floor it .
Of course any car can over take , but just how fast and safe u can do it comfortably
@@ylfyg I see what you mean, turbo kicks in at low rpm, while na reach max power in high revs. But you can always down shift to get power, especially on highways, 3rd gear gets you up to 140 kph. Personally I think this engine is powerful enough, I often rev it to the max power, like driving 60 kph in 2nd gear🤣.
Pretty sure using a proper summer tyres of goodyear\pirelli\continental level would yield a much better result, as we can see the limiting factor there is sideways sliding due to default all-season bridgestone tyres installed on this vehicle (they are pretty mediocre).
Bom vídeo, saludos desde Curitiba, Brasil. 🇧🇷
Forester Xt test pls. It has hard suspension and chasis
Dang, I didn't expect this good of a result. Any other mid-size SUVs do this well?
Peugeot 5008 better
@@EdwardZLiu Forester is 1.73m vs 1.64m of the 5008, that is 9cm taller (height).
It has also 3cm more of ground clearance (220mm vs 191mm).
So, pretty obvious that the Forester was bit slower...
@@MaurizioLattuada Once you know its capabilities offroad and on snow as well, it's even more impressive!
Yes there are other good mid-size SUV that do similar or better. Look up Nissan X-Trail (Rouge in North America) which can do 80 km/h
@@Xyb3rTeCh cx 5
Son las llantas Falkland muy malas yo las cambie por que el patinaje constante activaba el control de tracción hasta en velocidades muy bajas.
Con terreno seco no va mal aunque hay que pensarlo dos veces antes de adelantar, pero en mojado con los MS de serie va fatal, digan lo que digan, parece que vayas patinando
Nice result for the SUBIE - I love it ! Got the XV.
Me too, very happy with it. Have you seen the test on here?
@@grumpybugger110 ...yes I did !
👍 me too 🤗
Como te quedo el ojo Toyota RAV4 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 ALWAYS SUBARU.
Crosstrek?
I believe if that Subaru Forester were equipped with better tires it would easily do 80 km/h on moose test and slalom
Exactly. The tires are obviously the limiting factor here, the car just slides to the side. (And even with them this car got excellent results)
@@ozzless I wouldn’t exactly call it excellent, more likely it scrapped through.
How about the test of mitsubishi Outlander 2020?
People should be required to do this kind of testing for their drivers license
El problema es que el conductor normal desconoce cual será la reacción de los coches tal y como les ocurre a ustedes generalmente. No habrá segunda oportunidad para corregir. Actúa con seguridad el coche o no lo hace, punto.
Por eso es tan importante aprender a conocer el auto que tenemos, cualquiera que este sea, tratar de probar el auto en ambientes seguros para conocer sus reacciones. 👌🏻👌🏻🤓
@@benjamincaceres1524 Muy pocas personas lo hacemos y se lo digo con mi experiencia de más de 35 años en emergencias. Una vez un millonario me dijo que su 4x4 tenía que sacarlo sin tantas tonterías y tuve que enseñarle en medio de una laguna causada por las lluvias que era low y high range.
Podrían realizar la prueba en una blazer rs 2021 gracias
🤑Even with +10% price range of SUV
And there will be no better :
Stability in turning then boxer engine
Performance in off road then Xmode
Driving Assistance then eyesight
Acceleration then the XT AWD
Driving View with the giant screen
But almost anyone can beat Forester on
on fuel
Exterior looking and interior design
Cheaper parts ( but they don't need replacing anyway )
I managed to get 6.2liter/km on highway at average of speed between 90kmh to 100kmh
@@izfotografi9467 yea that's the differences 🤣 who would drive 90-100km on highway should be more like 100 mph for me
Tiguan did this test better. CR-v did this test better, CX-5 did this test better. CVT sucks in offroad.
Thanks, Subaru, not this time.
@@Away907 well I am not sure what you on about crv is on CVT too 😅 and yes cx5 can gives you up to 400 ish nm , but only the 2.5L turbo version or gls , which Subaru's CVT deliver upto 350 nm, and beat the rest models.
the 6speed AT will never as comfortable as CVT on daily driving , in the speaking off off road system we should both know the difference with all time AWD .
Anyway after all these years for real off road funs , merz are still the best somthing that BMW or Maserati can't do 🤣
@@Away907 Just saw the Tiguan test, and it was way worse than the Forester. It was actually abysmal, the car started jumping as crazy. The CX-5 has exactly the same result (with lower clearance and worse offroad capabilities).
Teknikens Varld argues that roads can’t be resized. OK, so do all moose appear at identical width Swedish rural roads then? There’s a reason why international ISO standards are adopted.
More importantly, the ISO 3888-2 requires tests to be repeated in both steering directions, which the Swedish publication don’t do. Surely moose don’t appear in just one direction right?
Imagina lo que puede hacer un legacy viendo esto
Un otro mundo especialmente con neumaticos normales no mud+snow
At what speed do you think would the Forester roll over?
Does anyone else get the feeling that OEM's are rated on a scale of safety based on how much they pay to safety companies? That was abysmal, yet it's praised as being controllable and safe.
Stability > nimbleness
I wanna see the Subaru Ascent on this test
You will not. That car most probably will never be imported in EU.
Performed well for a small SUV
es el subaru forester de quinta generacion el que no tiene tanta agilidad pero los de las anteriores generaciones mucho desempeño en estas pruebas
This is due to poor design by Subaru. There is a steering shaft isolator made of rubber that creates a lot of understeer. Many companies make parts to fix this issue such as PERRIN Steering Dampener Lockdown Kit.
I have a Forester that had major understeer issues driving hard and i did this mod and it made the vehicle handle 100X better.
In older models you could just install the steering linkage used on an sti. It didn't have the rubber damper. Just a solid metal shaft. I've done it on multiple cars. Definitely makes for a more confident on-center feel and crisper steering response instead of feeling like steering through sand sometimes.
But I'm not sure how this would affect understeer. That rubber damper would certainly numb steering feel and dampen a bit of responsiveness, but ultimately understeer is safer than oversteer so engineers design it into the suspension. Locking out the steering damper may have just given you better feel of what was going on at the wheels so you could drive the car more precisely. I doubt it actually changed the dynamics of the car at all.
This test makes Subaru a unfinished work
Va genial en carretera.
Con terreno seco no va mal aunque hay que pensárselo dos veces antes de adelantar, pero en mojado, al menos con los neumáticos MS de serie va fatal...a pesar de lo que digan
Con terreno seco no va mal aunque hay que pensarlo dos veces antes de adelantar, pero en mojado con los MS de serie va fatal, digan lo que digan, parece que vayas patinando
@@4rojo618 Los neumaticos de serie siempre van fatal no importa el coche,eso es una constante a los pocos kilometros lo mejor es cambiarlos.
Yo al mío le monté las yokohama geolandar M+S (de serie llevaba las geolandar normales ) y es allí en donde noté la diferencia el agarre en pavimento mojado es impresionante.
@@Jb74W No es por polemizar pero yo nunca he cambiado los neumáticos de serie del coche hasta que no han estado ya agotados, viajando por trabajo haciendo 40.000 kms/año durante más de 25 años consecutivos...Es decir que si realmente los de serie de este modelo son malos, que los pongan mejores, digo yo, no?
@@4rojo618 Como ya dije los Yokohama M+S van genial en suelo mojado .
Si no recuerdo mal, el Outback y el XV superaron la prueba a 74km/h "solamente".
Looses a lot of speed!?
mi hermano creo que este no es un test de carreras. bendiciones
Go test Haval H6!
Subaru XV eboxer!!
Pobre Forester, de ser una navaja suiza a ser una ballena.
Busco : subaru y las pruebas ,y me sale esto 😂😂😂 ,yo queria ver Re:zero xd
and all of that on 60 sidewall Bridgestone tires, germans alway blamed the tires for their bad results, LOL
Not bad for this high ground clerance. But why I feel the driver can do better than this on the test.. 🤔 If they want.
can you try with spanish car company? well, spanish SUV will not same result......
PA cuando el Citroen c elysee 2020
We want SEAT TOLEDO 2012-2018 ! ! !
Fiat 500x sport please
Good suv 🚙 not so good the m/s tires
Wheres the suzuki vitara at !!!!
You guys afraid it might win
Una pena que Subaru se empeñe en comercializar sus vehículos exclusivamente con cambio cvt, les hace perder todo el encanto.
Tiene otras virtudes que lo hacen ser un vehículo excepcional ... es una gran marca .. de las pocas o única que pagas lo que vale...
Es el futuro, la demanda por las anticuadas cajas manuales va en retroceso, Subaru las dejo de ofrecer ya que más del 85% de sus ventas eran vehículos automáticos, no es rentable tener cadena de producción para caja manual en paralelo.
@@sergeipelissier5690 En muchos casos lo que se le pide a la caja automática es que sea tan buena como la manual , las cvt sirven para ciclomotores y poco más y limitan mucho al conjunto del vehículo y motor. No creo que ninguna cvt de las que usa Subaru mejore a las cajas manuales que equipaban sus coches hace 15 años. Creo que va todo en la línea de ahorrar costes y ofrecen en Europa lo mismo que en EEUU. Vería más lógico que comercialicen menos vehículos pero que cumplan con la tendencia Europea. Si las marcas comienzan a promover los cambios automáticos es porque les conviene a ellos y porque han visto que a muchos usuarios les da igual ( ya sea por desconocimiento o lo que sea) . Donde esté una buena caja manual que se quite cualquier caja automática. Y si no que de lo digan a Honda. >.
@@sergeipelissier5690 cajas manuales anticuadas? Con esa Perla que has soltado, dejas claro que tu de automoción entiendes lo justito...
@@asturgallu tranquilo piloto de F1
Japanese engineering 💪🇯🇵🤣🤣
If Forester was on Michelin pilot sport 4, he can do this test much better.
Thank you
Not bad for a subaru
Pretty normal I should say. Subarus are known for their handling.
@@gagd7351 because of low center of gravity
Híbrido.... sabe !!!
Damn, Forester is so tall now. It is just like any other SUV. It has lost it's uniqueness.
Like a brick
77kmh en un SUV con unas bridgestone dueler, pero luego un golf 8 pasa a menos de 70 y la culpa es de unas bridgestone turanza con un cuarto del perfil de estas.
Pasa a 77km h pero es torpe ;)
@@AntonioMartinez-xt7gg no es si es torpe o que. Tampoco se que chasis es mas agil. Lo que tengo claro es que el esp del golf funciona mal. Pero no mal de peor que otros, mal de mal, de defectuoso.
Me refería al forester, se ha comentado de él que es torpe.
El golf tendria que ser una referencia y rodar mas que bien. Hay demasiada prisa por sacar modelos cada 6 meses.
This test is also interesting, so why not try to imitate it? ruclips.net/video/csy7V35p3IY/видео.html
The tester is Kazuo Shimizu, a famous Japanese rally driver and motor journalist.
Bring Hyundai i10 fwd to learn Subaru how to turn in this test 😂🚀🔥
У парней круглый год лето.
Нет, есть видео, где деревья голые. Интересно при какой температуре тестят.
Ford s-max pls
SUVでジグザグに走る輩に見て欲しいなー。
No se que has dicho...pero tú más, por si acaso... XD
スポーツカー、スポーツセダン、ホットハッチでも大半が同程度の成績ですから
スポーツカーだからと調子に乗ってジグザグ走行してる奴にも見て欲しい
Si si, totalmente de acuerdo contigo
@@Dekoy33 exacto, totalmente de acuerdo
@@jaimeignacio5626 jajajaja para que estén hablando de acabar con la humanidad y nosotros dándoles la razon... 😂😂
Como que es tan bueno el subaru? No paso los 78 y la xtrail la paso mejor a 80 entonces el subaru no es taaan seguro
La Forester tiene 22 cm de altura libre del suelo la de un Todo Terreno y el XTrail , la de un automóvil y pega hasta en un reductor de velocidad de velocidad Por eso nunca llegarás con un XTrail donde llega una Forester
It’s time to test Chinese cars Chery tiggo8, Haval h6
To tylko na rynek USA gdzie proste drogi i maksymalnie 70km/h się jeździ 🙂
85 miles/hour, not 70 kilometers/hour.
Yokohama Geolandar > Bridgestone Dueler
It’s that Boxer engine
Buono o non buono non ho capito.
i shocked
Duster Win 😂
Mercedes, worst than everything
conducteur novice
Better than cla...
Es patetico el desempeño que se observa del vehículo
3008 con tracción simple supera a Forester.
The 3008 has about 2.2cm less ground clearance than the Forester. The Forester is 11cm taller as well.
First:D ?
hero
ハンドル切りすぎだろw
１年前のコメントにレスを付けるのは気が引けますが・・・
現行フォレスターのステアリングはラフロードでのステアホイールへのキックバックを抑えるためにセンター付近のギア比がマイルドになっています。センターから徐々にギア比が上がって、外側は普通なんですけどね。取り回しで重要な最小回転半径はむしろ小さい部類
ジムニーはボールナット式ステアリングでキックバックを回避していますが、この方式では正確性が犠牲になる。フォレスターは乗用車としては一般的なラック＆ピニオン式で同じ効果を狙っています。アンダーステアとは違う
テストドライバーはこの特徴を理解していないので最初は相当戸惑っていますね。慣れれば良い仕組みだと納得できるのですが
Awd de Subaru una mierda prefiero Land Rover
Уродливая тачка