Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
thanks! it was really helpful! subscribed!
Thanks for explanation. Can you explain why the longitudinal fillet weld (with respect to force applied) strength is less then transverse fillet weld?
@ 30:24 video states that normal stress due to bending is Mr/J where J would represent second polar moment of inertia, shouldn't that be I (second moment of inertia) ?
thanks for the video. may I ask a question ? at 17:00 minute. you started to write an equation. sigma prime =.....where does it come from ?
+burak ayan That is the formula for calculating von Mises stress for planar stress element. If you google von Mises stress, you can find the formula.
+Yang Cao ı thank you for your answer. ı'm not a native speaker . ı couldn't get it
20:12 was it supposed to be 62.5 instead of 67.5 ?
no. because 62.5 was obtained when we consider max von mises stresses. And 67.5 is obtained when we considered max shear stress
is ko khud kuch nai ata ...is ki apni assignment nai ho rahi..
@@MFS498 galt bata rah ho app
can you tell me the book name from where you are taking values or expiation?
Shigley's Mechanical Design either 9th or 10th edition if you mean where the table came from that had the values.
thanks! it was really helpful! subscribed!
Thanks for explanation.
Can you explain why the longitudinal fillet weld (with respect to force applied) strength is less then transverse fillet weld?
@ 30:24 video states that normal stress due to bending is Mr/J where J would represent second polar moment of inertia, shouldn't that be I (second moment of inertia) ?
thanks for the video.
may I ask a question ? at 17:00 minute. you started to write an equation. sigma prime =.....
where does it come from ?
+burak ayan That is the formula for calculating von Mises stress for planar stress element. If you google von Mises stress, you can find the formula.
+Yang Cao ı thank you for your answer. ı'm not a native speaker . ı couldn't get it
20:12 was it supposed to be 62.5 instead of 67.5 ?
no. because 62.5 was obtained when we consider max von mises stresses. And 67.5 is obtained when we considered max shear stress
is ko khud kuch nai ata ...is ki apni assignment nai ho rahi..
@@MFS498 galt bata rah ho app
can you tell me the book name from where you are taking values or expiation?
Shigley's Mechanical Design either 9th or 10th edition if you mean where the table came from that had the values.