Was Jesus crucified? What does the Qur'an actually say?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- I discuss surah 4 verse 157 in its context and how its interpretation has been the subject of vigorous debate among Muslims for centuries.
I read from 'The Crucifixion and the Qur'an: A Study in the History of Muslim Thought' by Todd Lawson www.amazon.co....
A new translation of 4:157 says:
and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him.
Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran quran.com/4/157
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
We the entire Muslim populations of the world are so much of grateful to Allah The Almighty for granting us a honourable gentleman like you to easily understand the truth.
Except he’s lying..
@@monthapril6441 the stupid lie is the Bible written by the pagans who tried to crucify Jesus
@@salah777 Those that wrote the Bible teach there is one God. There is no writer of either the new or old testament that was a pagan. Read Isaiah 44 and 45 and you can see God really showing the folly of Paganism. If you really think the Bible was written by Pagans you need to prove it to yourself. You will discover it wasn't.
I'm going to guess you are saying this because of the doctrine of the trinity, but that is a false understanding of the trinity. Consider an actor that plays 3 different roles. It is the same actor but he represents 3 different characters. We wouldn't say we believe 3 actors played the 3 roles. God is one God. Allah was one of many pagan Gods in the Kabbalah. and marching around it 7 times was based on pagan beliefs. Look it up if you don't believe me. Islam is way more Pagan than the God of the Bible.
@Mourad arkjid It is not me or my experience that determines truth, but I will answer your question. I have read an English translation of the Koran from cover to cover and I have read many of the sayings that are attributed to Mohammed in the Hadiths. I've watched Muslim and Christian apologists debate each other and watched Muslim and Christian RUclips channels defending their faiths. So yes, I have read quite a bit about Islam. I am a Christian apologist that is not afraid of losing my Christianity. I have been friends with Muslims I have met and worked with, but they generally don't know much about their own faith. Read Psalm 22 in the Bible and then read about Jesus in any of the 4 Gospels. It is clear from the Bible that Jesus fulfilled prophecies about him made in the Old Testament. Muslim's claim to believe in the Psalms and in prophecy, so I encourage you to study it.
@@evanbirkby4501 I like to ask you question if you don't mind, purely from interest. Why do jews not see jesus as having fullfilled prophecies, isn't there something about building a temple? Have a good day.
Never got interested in religious studies until I found you.
@Gary Dalbec not really
@Gary Dalbec
Is the mathematical lock of the Quran a myth too?
You obviously have no clue.
Pfff.
@Gary Dalbec
Why change the topic?
@Gary Dalbec Quran are the words of God and asking created and not created should be avoided since it doesn't lead anywhere but confusion
@Gary Dalbec
And you?
Created or just a natural mistake?
Huge respect for a man who cares about the context and shows the whole picture rather than nitpicking. May the Lord bless you, sir.
Paul is the lawless false prophet of mathew 24 :11 in acts 9 :3 saw devil of luke 10 :18, Jesus is only sent to his tribe, paul went to Arabia & then the world, he thought he's the global prophet of isiah 42 Mt Sela Medina of Islam, but he set up the law giver Prophet like Moses & in isiah 49 Jesus returns to follow Islam of Nabi Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him.
It says Jesus leaves Zion, and will celebrate with the singing mountain Arabs of the light of nations of Isiah 42 of Kedar or Ismael, So Jesus returns following Islam even in the bible!
FOR GET ABOUT RELELIGION ITS ITS ALL YOUR CHOISE HOW YOU LEAD YOUR LIFE
Stop wasting time with an old Muslim man talking.
@@hegagi839 funny how when someone gets proven wrong it's stop wasting ur time with an old man 😐
@@hegagi839 he’s not even muslim he just a theologist
We need a Paul in every town, not any Paul but this Paul.
Indeed.
Can I buy one?
Brother Paul, I very much enjoy listening to your videos while I drive, so thank you! When you say that whether or not one wants to believe the Quran, well it’s a matter of faith, I think that sounds like something the Christians would say about the Bible but one of the reasons I was convinced that Islam is the truth was because of what some call “scientific miracles” in the Quran. For instance, the stages of the embryo or the fact that the Quran identifies the worker bee as female and there are several others but these things I don’t think could have been known by any man or woman in the time of Muhammad (pbuh), especially the great detail of conception and the stages of the embryo which one would need a microscope and some knowledge to have known. I hope this did not come across as rude or anything just my thoughts and feelings of the matter.
Gary Dalbec oh but embryologist have recognized the Qurans insight into the stages of the development of the embryo! You are wrong sir. Ever heard of Dr. Keith Moore? You people are just grabbing at straws, anything you can but I hate it for you. If you want to believe that God was a man or that he would have his own son killed in a human sacrifice (which the Old Testament says that human sacrifice is an abomination to God but go ahead believe as you wish) or that he would have someone else pay for your sins, go ahead(even though Ezekiel ch18vs20 goes against that as well) but stop wasting my time and yours with crazy claims against the Quran, it’s a book that someone who thinks like you will never understand. You care nothing about truth.
Gary Dalbec ruclips.net/video/HdqpxdEeDdU/видео.html
Gary Dalbec ruclips.net/video/47N37nC01WI/видео.html
Gary Dalbec I do not come on here to insult people, call names or act childish. I converse and share thoughts and information not to change anyone’s mind but for those few who were like me 20 years ago, those who know the faith I was apart of just could not be the ultimate truth or the straight path, I am here for those people. I am not here for the proud and the arrogant, those who are condescending or foul mouthed. You don’t know me yet you somehow know that I “know nothing” about Dr.Keith Moore. The second video I shared with you had Dr.Keith Moore in it talking about the subject of the stages of the Embryo in the Quran, I thought who better to tell you than the distinguished gentleman I had mentioned, right? There is plenty of information readily available to anyone who would like know the truth on different websites and even many RUclips videos where people have graciously given their own time to produce such valuable information to those who seek it. If you choose to watch it May I also suggest looking into Dr Maurice Buccaille as well, he was a Well known French doctor for one of the Kings of Saudi Arabia and a best selling author who made some incredible discoveries concerning Ramsey 2 of Egypt and correctly identifying him as the Pharoh who drowned chasing Moses across the Red Sea. Neither the Bible or the Quran spoke of the Pharoh by name but in the Quran Allah does tell the Pharoh as he is drowning that his body will be preserved as an example for future generations. Dr.Bucailles story is an amazing one but you should read it yourself as nothing I say is going to make you see. May Allah guide you.
Gary Dalbec actions are the result of ones intentions and I can tell by you silly little comments that you are hiding a small mind behind a big mouth. I have in no way embarrassed myself nor blasphemed my Lord, The ONE TRUE GOD ALLAH! Say whatever you wish now, you’ve exposed yourself as a troll and will be ignored like one.
Jesus was never crucified Allah picked him up in the 2nd heaven subhanah Allah.
Good work on getting the microphone. It helps us to hear your wealth of knowledge clearly. Thanks
My pleasure!
@@BloggingTheology Hi Paul. I am a Christian and wanted to know if you would kindly consider having a friendly respectful dialogue on this topic soon to discuss points of agreement and disagreement? Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you!
@@Ttcopp12rt do you have a youtube debate I can see?
@@BloggingTheology Here’s a friendly exchange I had with a Jehovah’s Witnesses apologist from Australia ruclips.net/video/iLKvydk6cvM/видео.html
@@BloggingTheology Here’s a respectful debate I had last year ruclips.net/video/i39IZKdLzj8/видео.html
The only videos I watch from beginning to end
Peace be upon you, I found your channel today and btw am a muslim.I don't know what religion you follow but I think you are closer to the truth than you think.I love your analytical commentary and I pray you are guided to Islam.peace be upon you brother
He is a Muslim
@@ItachiAli1993 not yet
Truly
I wish Muslims would not say things like ‘you are closer to the truth than you think’.
You are not in a place to speak as if you have reached a place of more truth than another. Far from it, you do not know what Allah brings to another person. Paul is clearly guided and it is not for any to ask his faith, it is in his heart as Allah knows exactly what it is
@@inaaranur1611 brother there is only one Truth
@@ItachiAli1993 Is he say : ''im a muslim'' ?
They did not kill him nor did they crucify him but appeared to them so. Cannot be more clear than that!!!
According to jewish people ..They Killed him by hung him
Agreed, it is perfecly clear that it is wrong.
@@johnzuma4688 okay buddy
"but appeared to them so" So allah you god tricked the disciples who witnesses the crucifixion and made it appear to them so.
@@babylonking9896 no not the disciples, they had the knowledge all the people who have knowledge of the scripture knew. But the people who tried to kill jesus were only deceiving themselves. Jesus was saved while they thought they killed him lol how embarrassing for them
Paul not sure why the Translation has it in brackets as you mentioned coz its there in the Arabic - wama qataloohu wama salaboohu
Thanks Paul for your videos and hard work to find and tell others about the the truth you found.
I, too, don’t understand why it is in brackets! The verse is so clear that it does not need an explanation!
Waw brother Paul...I was not see and understand this ayat(vers) like this even I was read from my roumanian translated Qur'an...great work...may Allah do easy for other
people understand amen
Thx Bro Paul... Read Quran chapter 4:157.. No brackets... It says 'no kill and no crucified'
وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا الْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَٰكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ وَإِنَّ الَّذِينَ اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ لَفِي شَكٍّ مِّنْهُ مَا لَهُم بِهِ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا اتِّبَاعَ الظَّنِّ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًا
And because of their saying (in boast), "We killed Messiah 'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of 'Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. 'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)]:
I think the brackets were used just for stressing and highlighting a fact; one of the uses of them in translating The Quran.
Firstly, your response is the most honest in terms of what the verse comments about disputing over it, as in "Those who disputed about him are deeply in doubt about him. They have no knowledge whatsoever, except the following of strong assumption." Picking sides and arguing over it as the Quran has warned is going to be all about following strong assumptions and remaining drowned in doubt about it. So the best bet is to say 'I don't know', to avoid being in doubt or taking strong assumptions. This is the answer I like the most.
Secondly, I like how you started with the context. You may not know it, but even Arabic supports your choice of starting from that verse: The first words of the verse in question,
و قولِهم
has the slanted line diacritic under the letter 'laam', and this happens only if there is a letter or word coming before, that forced this diacritic to be there. This letter is the letter baa in the starting of the preceding verse, and that verse is connected back to preceding verse and they all go back to where you started from.
Thirdly, again you may not know it but Arabic supports your way of opening up the possibilities. If Allah wanted, he would have given a clear-cut denial by saying 'he was not killed nor was he crucified', but He rather said 'they did not kill him nor did they crucify him'. The fact that the part 'they did not kill him certainly' repeating the assertion that Jews failed should ring a bell that it is not so clear cut. One would say the Romans did put the title of 'Jesus the King of Jews' after crucifixion and refer to the beginning of the verse where it says 'Messiah Jesus' but Romans did not call him 'Son of Mary' or 'Messenger of Allah' and it is departing from Quran's language to pull a verse of out of context and say it is talking about Romans not crucifiying him, while all verses before it referred to Jews when using the words 'they' or 'them'.
Now, there is a point where I am finding it a bit hard to agree, which is that empirical problem. It is because the verse is more than just about whether they crucified him(which is in parenthesis hehehe, pun intended): It also strongly asserts, using super strong Arabic language (there are at least five mechanics used in total that I can see from my knowledge), the following: "Those who dispute about it are deeply in doubt. There have about it no knowledge whatsoever, except the following of strong assumptions". If we look now, those who are disputing over the matter are not with clear-cut evidences. The side that assumes he was crucified has to strongly assume the historicity of the event which is getting more doubtful. The side that assumes otherwise has to strongly assume this conclusion first and then read it into the old testament, the new testament, and the quran in that light and will find backing there but not an explicit one. The fact that the verse very strongly mentioned the uncertainty of positions, and the need of strongly assuming to take positions for those who are going to dispute over it while they are drowning in doubt about it is something remarkable of a statement to make 14 centuries ago according to me. Certainty about the uncertainty of positions to come.
Do let me know if you would like to know about the mechanics used for boosting certainty of this part of the verse which was not in parenthesis 😊. If Allah Wills, they are very easy to learn and have been used separately throughout quran (rarely are the mechanics combined together like this I believe)
It was an amazing summary, thank you so much for it.
Assalam-u alaikum, Faisal. I'd like to learn about the mechanics employed, please. Thanks in advance for your time.
Br. Paul, how about doing a stream with Joram van Klaveren? It would be a really interesting one.
I'm from the Netherlands, and this man was a hardcore hater of Islam!
wonderful idea!
Informative. I would also recommend to you to read Ahmed Deedat's books on the matter. He was ahead of his time in religious studies.
ADAM (PBUH), THE FIRST MAN ON EARTH, LIVED 5,800 YEARS AGO
As per the genealogy of Jesus Christ given in the Bible, from Jesus through Abraham (pbuh) to the first man on earth i.e. Adam (pbuh), Adam appeared on the earth approximately 5800 years ago:
1948 years between Adam (pbuh) and Abraham (pbuh)
Approximately 1800 years between Abraham (pbuh) and Jesus (pbuh)
2000 years from Jesus (pbuh) till today
These figures are further confused by the fact that the Jewish calendar is currently on or about 5800 years old.
There is sufficient evidence from archaeological and anthropological sources to suggest that the first human being on earth was present tens of thousands of years ago and not merely 5,800 years ago as is suggested by the Bible.
The Qur’an too speaks about Adam (pbuh) as the first man on earth but it does not suggest any date or period of his life on earth, unlike the Bible - what the Bible says in this regard is totally incompatible with science.
12. NOAH (PBUH) AND THE FLOOD
The Biblical description of the flood in Genesis chapter 6, 7 and 8 indicates that the deluge was universal and it destroyed every living thing on earth, except those present with Noah (pbuh) in the ark. The description suggests that the event took place 1656 years after the creation of Adam (pbuh) or 292 years before the birth of Abraham, at a time when Noah (pbuh) was 600 years old. Thus the flood may have occurred in the 21st or 22nd Century B.C.
This story of the flood, as given in the Bible, contradicts scientific evidence from archaelogical sources which indicate that the eleventh dynasty in Egypt and the third dynasty in Babylonia were in existence without any break in civilisation and in a manner totally unaffected by any major calamity which may have occurred in the 21st century B.C. This contradicts the Biblical story that the whole world had been immersed in the flood water. In contrast to this, the Qur’anic presentation of the story of Noah and the flood does not conflict with scientific evidence or archaeological data; firstly, the Qur’an does not indicate any specific date or year of the occurance of that event, and secondly, according to the Qur’an the flood was not a universal phenomenon which destroyed complete life on earth. In fact the Qur’an specifically mentions that the flood was a localised event only involving the people of Noah.
It is illogical to assume that Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) had borrowed the story of the flood from the Bible and corrected the mistakes before mentioning it in the Qur’an.
13. MOSES (PBUH) AND PHARAOH OF THE EXODUS
The story of Moses (pbuh) and the Pharaoh of the Exodus are very much identical in the Qur’an and the Bible. Both scriptures agree that the Pharaoh drowned when he tried to pursue Moses (pbuh) and led the Israelites across a stretch of water that they crossed. The Qur’an gives an additional piece of information in Surah Yunus chapter 10 verse 92:
"This day shall We save thee in thy body, that thou mayest be a sign to those who come after thee! But verily, many among mankind are heedless of Our Signs!"
[Al-Qur’an 10:92]
Dr. Maurice Bucaille, after a thorough research proved that although Rameses II was known to have persecuted the Israelites as per the Bible, he actually died while Moses (pbuh) was taking refuge in Median. Rameses II’s son Merneptah who succeeded him as Pharaoh drowned during the exodus. In 1898, the mummified body of Merneptah was found in the valley of Kings in Egypt. In 1975, Dr. Maurice Bucaille with other doctors received permission to examine the Mummy of Merneptah, the findings of which proved that Merneptah probably died from drowning or a violent shock which immediately preceeded the moment of drowning. Thus the Qur’anic verse that we shall save his body as a sign, has been fulfilled by the Pharaohs’ body being kept at the Royal Mummies room in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.
This verse of the Qur’an compelled Dr. Maurice Bucaille, who was a Christian then, to study the Qur’an. He later wrote a book ‘The Bible, the Qur’an and Science’, and confessed that the author of the Qur’an can be no one else besides God Himself. Thus he embraced Islam.
14. QUR’AN IS A BOOK FROM ALLAH
These evidences are sufficient to conclude that the Qur’an was not copied from the Bible, but that the Qur’an is the Furqaan - ‘the Criteria’ to judge right from wrong and it should be used to decipher which portion of the Bible may be considered as the Word of God.
The Qur’an itself testifies in Surah Sajda chapter 32 verse 1 to 3
Alif Laam Meem.
(This is) the revelation of the Book in which there is no doubt - from the Lord of the Worlds.
Or do they say, ‘He has forged it’? Nay, it is the Truth from thy Lord, that thou mayest admonish a people to whom no warner has come before thee: in order that they may receive guidance." [Al-Qur’an 32:1-3]
@@AllaahuAkbar60 Absolutely beautiful 🙏🙌❤
But Ahmad Deedat is a Christian before his death bed 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
@@muhammadkhairulizat WTF are you talking about?
@@johnnydevault7838 that Deedat guy not even a Muslim, he is a Christian 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
One important argument for non crucifixion of jesus is Jewish theologies believe that a messenger of god cannot be killed. Here a distinction needs to be drawn between messenger(rasul in Arabic) and a prophet(nabi in Arabic). In layman's terms messenger usually bring them a scripture and a law with them. Noah abraham moses jesus and Muhammad according to quran are rasul. That's why in the same verse you talked about in its initial part, quran says ( 4:157) And because of their saying, "We killed Al-
Masih `Isa, son of Maryam, the Messenger of
Allah,
Here it is clear that they are taunting upon jesus and using oxymoron(according to their perspective) that they 'killed' jesus 'messenger of Allah' suggesting since jesus was killed, he cannot be a messenger of Allah as he claims to be
Other argument is that messenger cannot be harmed which is best illustrated in below mentioned video
ruclips.net/video/8aeOX8tLQKo/видео.html
@@redsauce5270 yes that video is amazing
Brother Paul this is just a random comment. 😅😅
Just wanted to say that can you one day take out time from your schedule and make a video about books you read, your collection which we see in every video of yours in backside and what you recommend readers to read ?
And BTW nice video 👌
Inshallah
@@BloggingTheology does your reply mean no?..like how the mps use "Insha"Alllah" as a so called funny way to say no? maybe I'm reading into it too much.
@@gerrymein5282 it means yes God willing.
@@BloggingTheology Oky doky, I didnt know you were muslim...I suppose muslims come in all different ethnicities
@@gerrymein5282 just look up any documentary on Hajj (pilgrimage) and see Muslims from Alaska to Australia. It's a universal religion. Every person owes it to himself or herself to at least hear the proposition of this religion.
Thank you for your existence sir!
You are doing great job on opening people's minds.
Worship the creator Allah and not his creation Jesus PBUH...Ben Khalid Mohammed is an amazing Muslim profile on Facebook and this brother is inspiring millions of people to embrace Islam Alhamdulila
@Gary Dalbec Jesus PBUH never claimed divinity at all...
@Gary Dalbec Professor Bart Ehrman clearly proved that Jesus PBUH never claimed divinity at all...
@Gary Dalbec Jesus PBUH never claimed divinity at all..
@Gary Dalbec Jesus PBUH never celebrate Christmas at all..
@Gary Dalbec Worship the creator Allah and not his creation Jesus PBUH...
Greatly enjoyed the analytical presentation, Thanks and take care.
ruclips.net/video/U79a-7kRWJY/видео.html
This lying doesnt help
@Salafiyyaaa i'd really appreiciate if u showed me where the lie is??
Muslim: "Jesus never died"
Quran 19:33
Peace be upon me the day I was born, the day I die, and the day I will be raised back to life!”
Me:okay
@Gary Dalbec funny how you get proven wrong and start bringing strawmans 😐
@Gary Dalbec when you claim smthn provide some evidence
Paul you’re honesty may God guide you and make your Joerney easier.
Seems kind of strange that all you do is attack Christianity by proclaiming it is false. Do you ever question or attack any other religion? If the Apostles all knew Jesus didn't die on the cross and wasn't resurrected why would all of them go to their death proclaiming it?
In my humble view, in response to the ones who said ( some muslims) that it means that the jews didn’t ( meaning that Jesus was crucified by romans) : in this case why allah said : it appears to them ( that he was crucified). Allah would have stopped in the terms : they didn’t kill him nor crucified him . Only( wich may mean somebody else did)
Why adding: it appeared to them !
Either they started to do so or where witnessing the act of crucifixion but this wasn’t real ( maybe somebody else looking like him ,or a vision : we have in the sira of prophet Mohammed (pbuh) that he escaped from the unbeleivers while they were waiting outside his home to kill him and that allah make them like blind until he left ) maybe that’s what happened to Jesus (pbuh) .and then he was raised by allah (not died) this explains that he will come back in the last time ( Allah said that there is no changes in allah order , Jesus can’t die and then resurrect in the same live , once a human dies he resurrect in the day of judgement.
Finally Allah is the all knowing
Dear Paul, thank you very much that was very interesting. You really have conveyed the message as it is. Yes people can interpret but the fact remains as you mentioned from the Quranic encyclopedia @11:35.
If I may contribute to the subject, it is mentioned that Jesus had knowledge from God of the plot to kill him. In the Bible where Jesus says to his disciples “The Son of Man is being betrayed into the hands of men, and they will kill Him". I'm not quoting the versus numbers, but it is mentioned in a few places. And in the Quran, surah 2 v 55.
Clearly anyone with such knowledge would try to escape but he knew his killing would never happen and instead he knew of his ascention.
It is also worth mentioning that Jesus was an absolute phenomena that has no parallel in human history. His birth was a miracle, his works were miraculous, his end was as miraculous and mysterious as his beginning. This was a tremendous test or trial for those who believe in the oneness of God and what this God is capable of doing.
The Jews denied that Jesus was the Messiah and the Gentiles made him a diety. Sadly both parties let Jesus down because his main message was to worship the one and only God. The same message given to every prophet from Adam to Muhammed, peace be upon them all.
Was Adam a prophet?
Lies of Mohammad that Adam, king Solomon, Job etc etc were Prophets ?
Indeed Jesus Christ was crucified. Died and resurrected aft three days .
But Mohammad falsely said Jesus Christ the God of the heavens and the earth was not crucified , but someone like him, and Jesus Christ was taken to heaven by God .
If Koran says Jesus did not die but is taken to God himself then Jesus is God and your Koran confirm that.And that Jesus is coming back.
My dear friend if Mohammad is the last Prophet why is Jesus coning and not Mohammad.
In your Koran Mohammad died from rat poisoning ,and left lying for three days and began to rot , before they knew that his claim that he tio will rise from the dead aft three days did not happen right?
@@sahrjabba124 @sahr jabba Yes they were prophets because God communicated with them through Angel Gabriel or what you call the Holy Spirit. Some of the Prophets were given a message to convey to their people (to worship the one and only God) and they are called messengers, like Ibrahim, Moses, Jesus and Mohammed peace be on them all. So all messengers are prophets but not all prophets are messengers.
All messengers before Mohammed were sent to their own people but Mohammed was sent to all mankind. Jesus says he was sent to the Jews only, so are you a jew!?
Jesus tells you “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come"
Allah says about Mohammed in the Quran,
1) By the star when it goes down/descends
(2) Your companion [Muhammad] has not strayed, nor has he erred (3) Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination/desire (4) He is not but a revelation revealed.
I don't understand why Christianity puts so much emphasis on the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus!! Where was Jesus after the resurrection and what did he do? Also the whole thing is based on hearsay.
Brother Jabba, I can go on trying to explain to you but it will not change a thing in you if you don't open your heart and mind and go directly to God to guide you to his true path.
And by the way rat poison was not invented yet during the time of Mohammed. Simply his time on earth has come to an end just like you and I we'll meet the same fate. But when you are resurrected to face your God and tell Him Jesus was my God, that will be associating partners with God and its the only sin that God does not forgive. Be aware and mindful, may Allah guide you.
@@khalidsalim5357 very well answered .
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
QURAN is a final book of God without a doubt. And these are God's final words to the mankind, for the believers for their own benefits. Subhan Allah
Well apparently the first few times, God forgot to reveal everything. Perhaps he left things out of this "final" revelation yet again. Listen to the nonsense you're spouting.
what an analysis. i envy your insight. be blessed sir.
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
When faced with archaeoligical findings and analysis of historical texts and documents, Quranic statements within a historical context tend to be correct compared to biblical ones. A good example for this is "Haman, the minister for stone quarries of the Pharaoh" as stated in the Quran and proven later by archaeological findings.
And many others including the big bang theory and expansion of the universe
@@Michael-Bruh
Are you blind ?
What about meteors shooting sheitans ??
@@tokyo.peking uh, yeah? Whats wrong with that exactly? And I'm pretty sure there's a same verse in the bible alike it.
@@Michael-Bruh
Really, wbere in bible is "big bang" or "meteors shooting" shooting devils ?
@@tokyo.peking I was only talk about the method shooting. But again, I said I think.. I've seen it somewhere but idk what verse and what's your point on it anyway?
Just found your channel last week. Awesome content! Thank you from the States.
Thanks!
Take the verse as it it is,a fact,nothing more said
ruclips.net/video/U79a-7kRWJY/видео.html
This lying doesnt help
How do you 'reason away' the accounts from Roman sources that Jesus was executed by the governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate according to A.D. 64, the Roman historian Tacitus similarly Pliny the Younger attests to the historical Jesus. Lucian of Samosata was a second-century Greek satirist. In one of his works, he wrote of the early Christians as follows( in which he attests to Christ's crucifixion )age who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account..
@Faisal Siraj Peace be with you. I am glad that you implicitly acknowledge that the scriptures (both old and new) are the word of God, not man.
The death of Jesus was part of a divine plan to save humanity. The death and resurrection of this one man is at the very heart of the Christian faith. For Christians, it is through Jesus's death that people's broken relationship with God, from the time of the fall in the Garden of Eden, is restored. This is known as the Atonement
From God’s promise to provide a sacrifice (Genesis 22:8-14), to the prophecy that the Messiah would be cut off (Daniel 9:26), to almost innumerable promises and prophecies in-between, it all had to be fulfilled in the death of Jesus. Even the way Jesus would die was prophesied hundreds of years before it happened (Psalm 22:11-18, Zechariah 12:10 Isaiah 53:7b).
Jesus lived His entire life in obedience to God the Father, but it was important for Him to remain faithful unto death. In John 12:27-28 Jesus said shortly before He went to the cross: "Now My soul is troubled, and what shall I say? 'Father, save Me from this hour'? But for this purpose, I came to this hour. Father, glorify Your name.”
In the video it is asserted that Christ's disciples were to far away from the cross to verify if it truly was Christ on the cross, however, we have this account just before Christ's death.
“Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. 26 When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, 'Dear woman, here is your son,' 27 and to the disciple, 'Here is your mother.' From that time on, this disciple took her into his home." (John 19:25-27)
But he was pierced for our transgressions,
he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was on him,
and by his wounds we are healed.
We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
each of us has turned to our own way;
and the Lord has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.
He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,
and as a sheep before its shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mouth.
By oppression and judgment, he was taken away.
Yet who of his generation protested?
For he was cut off from the land of the living;
for the transgression of my people, he was punished.
He was assigned a grave with the wicked,
(crucified between two thieves)
and with the rich in his death,
though he had done no violence,
nor was any deceit in his mouth.
Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer,
and though the Lord makes his life an offering for sin,
he will see his offspring and prolong his days,
and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.
After he has suffered,
he will see the light of life and be satisfied;
(The resurrection of Christ)
by his knowledge, my righteous servant will justify many,
and he will bear their iniquities.
Therefore I will give him a portion among the great,
and he will divide the spoils with the strong,
because he poured out his life unto death,
and was numbered with the transgressors.
For he bore the sin of many,
and made intercession for the transgressors.” -Isaiah 52:13-53:12
@Faisal Siraj Quote The author of John, or whosoever was adding and editing stuff in it, FLIPPED Mark upside down to try to save this fiction called Crucifixion Endquote. John was there at the foot of the cross and was a first-hand witness to it Mark was not
Quote:John:
Jesus carries the cross by himself Endquote John says " Carrying his own cross" only and "not by Himself" in other words someone could also have helped Him
Quote: The women are afar and it is dark
Mark Gospel Endquote
John was an eyewitness Mark was not: Jesus died at 3pm when the darkness which descended at noon lifted so it was not dark.
Quote: Mark:
Jesus prays that the cup is TAKEN AWAY
John:
Jesus denies making such a prayer Endquote Quote John denying Christ or Christ Himself denying making this prayer!!
Quote;Gospel of Mark 15:22 - it's talking about Simon of Cyrene being Crucified instead of Jesus.Endquote
This is the most ridiculous assertion. Christ who was scourged and had a crown of thorns on his head by the Romans could somehow be swapped for Simon of Cyrene and the Romans not knowing? When was the swap made?
@@brianingram4709
YOU WROTE: "Carrying his own cross" only and "not by Himself" in other words someone could also have helped him"
I WRITE: The "faith" of conjecture, Sorry to say, falls back on conjecture 👉 "could also have". I gave YOU scriptures which REFUTE YOUR position and EXPOSED and DESTROYED the FICTION called Jesus's Crucifixion BUT YOU'VE RAN to "could also have". 👈
*You actually prove publicly that YOU have NOTHING but CONJECTURE to follow*
Mark 15:21
A certain man from Cyrene, SIMON, the father of Alexander and Rufus, was passing by on his way in from the country, AND THEY FORCED HIM TO CARRY THE CROSS.
NOWHERE does it say that they forced Simon to help Jesus along to carry the cross.
Please heed the SERIOUS WARNING given in the scriptures which you profess to uphold. It's a very serious warning on lack of knowledge and on rejecting knowledge. You must heed this warning. It's from the very scripture which you profess to uphold. It's for your own BENEFIT that such warning is given.
Hosea 4:6
My people are *DESTROYED for LACK OF KNOWLEDGE* : *because thou hast REJECTED KNOWLEDGE*, 🚩🚩🚩🚩 *I will also reject thee* , that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
*********
The consequence of you not heeding the warning of the very verse you have already seen and this will continue to show up right in front of you. Its knowledge which has utterly exposed and destroyed the FICTION called Jesus's Crucifixion.
God Almighty is very explicit and dismissive on the subject of Crucifixion. God Almighty says in His FINAL Revelation - The Quran - given to His Prophet of Deuteronomy 18 V 18-19 Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)
That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, 🚩 *AND THOSE WHO DIFFER THEREIN ARE FULL OF DOUBTS, WITH NO (CERTAIN) KNOWLEDGE* , 👉 BUT ONLY CONJECTURE to follow 👈, for of a surety they killed him not:-
Quran 4:157
@Faisal Siraj Engaging in hyperbole and accusing me of what you are doing, that is ignoring the evidence of Christ divinity, His mission including death on the cross from the old testament scriptures I have provided, will not advance a fruitful discussion. Also in regards to Hebrew and understanding the translation to English, there are online resources of the Old Testament in Hebrew to help the interested in understanding the translation.
5:00
This phrase is not in brackets, it is part of the verse in Arabic, and it is essential. They did not kill him and did not crucify him
We ma qeteluhu we ma salabuhu وما قتلوه وما صلبوه
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
@@josephmusembikyalo5580
It is not strange for a person who worships humans to disrespect God and to blaspheme. Learn to speak politely about your Creator. Its only for your own good.
Paul, the Romans and Constantine lied to you. As for the followers of Christ, they remained with James and Peter, adhering to the commandments and their faith. The cross led the Romans to adopt Christ and know the God of Abraham. Imagine if the world today is controlled by two billion pagans in the West and the ancient colonies, what would our condition be like? God saved his Christ from crucifixion as In Psalm 91, and He made the Romans themselves spread the name of Christ in the world. You do not appreciate the greatness of your Lord
I'm not the source of the verse but Alla,let Alla and followers tell the world why make (lie) swap Jesus for another man.I don't insult any but a character repeatedly is Alla as also being a misguider Quran 14:4 And We did not send any messenger except [speaking] in the language of his people to state clearly for them, and Allah sends astray [thereby] whom He wills and guides whom He wills. And He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.then how will he judge those he misguides?
Jesus speaks for himself luke24:7The Son of Man must be delivered over to the hands of sinners, be crucified and on the third day be raised again.’ “
You should also refer bible quotes in previous chats .
We worship not a god scared of being unable to raise the dead but a mighty one John 11:43 And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.
44 And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.
@@josephmusembikyalo5580
Yet you miss one important passage: Leviticus 16:9-11, The Jew Paul, after he accepted Jesus the Messiah. when formulating his doctrine about Jesus, had to ignore this passage. If one does not ignore it, one can reach one very profound understanding of the mission of Jesus. In fact in his lifetime one can recognize that Jesus changed his message he was preaching. Go to my channel to watch a short video about this topic.
Why, would pagan Westerners have murdered, maimed and terrorised even more millions of people in aggressive wars far from their borders, even more than the Noble Christian West has in the past 100-plus years? listen to yourself, you shameless ignorant zealot.
Extremely unbiased. Keep up the excellent work!
Br Paul so nice to see you and continuing to great Dawah as always
I just subscribed
MashaAllah you have lost weight
oh thank you for existing dear Sir!! (I've always been interested in philosophy of religions, but was always scared to even "look into it!" because i had this belief that it is impossibly hard and complicated and that I wouldn't understand a thing at all! But here you are, making things so much simpler in your calm voice and zen attitude. It is a pleasure listening to you. I am learning so much!!! thank you again for sharing!
You are very welcome
@@BloggingTheology hi shalom aleichom I like your videos. But can I ask something. Is it possible that Jesus was swooned? Bcuz classic muslim commentators stated that Jesus was never put on cross according to sura 4:157. But some scholars argue that he was on the cross but didn't die but swooned. What do you think about it?
Also second question I would ask "Is the empty tomb story true?"
@@phenomenal17playz Muslims do not believe Jesus died on the cross or he resurrected after 3 days or he appeared to some of his disciples. Well, If he wasn't crucified and Therefore did not die; then there is no talk of an empty tomb.
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
If Jesus was crucified and died, then he was not the messiah, according to the Old Testament.
True!
Yup, you're right, according to Jewish belief, they believe that the Messiah cannot be harmed, because of the prophecy in the Old Testament (Psalms 20:6; Psalms 91:9-16; Pslams 116)
spot on
@@haikalsafrisam7818 @ most scholars forgot to study why the jews hunger to kill n to crux jesus...it is bcos of the prophecy....if he got killed...then he is the fake messiah..... who else other than jesus that claimed the title messiah...it was king herod the one who murdered prophet yahya.... the proof that herods kings claimed to be the messiah....just look at the coin issued by herods during his reign...it show the sign of X (chi).... for Kristos
@@mejamakan3054 absolutely right
. “Allah “SWA don’t make any mistakes.He knows what we don’t know.
The Quran is wright.
That's "right" and NOT "wright".
وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَـٰكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ
No parenthesis here. It is a clear cut part from the verse 4:157
Furthermore, it is not from established orthodox tradition to give much weight to esoteric interpretations, even if on rare occasions, it comes from sound scholarly authority.
If it was Mohammed (pbuh) the one Who wrote the quran (which is impossible) wouldn't he have told the same story as the Christians to win them to his side?
13:00, Dear Paul, you may like this
13:00 the classical view of muslim scholars on crucifixion is based on their knoweldge of how God uses the language too.. When Allah's , SW, deny a thing with a word or affirm a thing with a word frequently if it encompasses the 2 meanings of the word. both meaning apply. Notice "they killed him not NOR crucify him" What is the obvious first read on this? that is the answer. example when God said Roman was defeated but will win "fei adna" adna mean the closest land (to Arabia) but Adna means to lowest, and both meaning apply, dead sea area is the closest to Arabia and it is the lowest land on earth (ardh) not sea.
Add to that God deny the killing AND the crucifixion process
Ali Ataie, insinuate , and Shabir pointed out that crucifixion has 2 meaning:
1. crucified and died on the cross
2. crucified but then taken down from the cross without dying.
That is true, but:
if it is the First meaning Allah saying they did not Kill him debunk the first meaning of word "Crucifixion".
If the second meaning happened (nailed to the cross but survived), then the quran would be partially inaccurate because it would miss the first meaning of the word crucifixion (that is he was crucified AND DIED, on the cross). reader need to read that again.. it requires concentration..
Further, If God said "but they did not CRUCIFY him" alone without the verb "kill" then that would be a different story, (it open the possibility that they may or MAY NOT killed him by other mean).
Another point to consider, if the 1st meaning of crucifixion happened, he was killed, : Allah would be saying the did not kill him (that is enough) NOR killed him (by mean of hanging on the cross), that is unnecessary given the first word "they did not kill him which encompass death by crucifixion) so why God added NOR crucified him? this would render a redundant word, though you can argue saying that Quran sometimes use emphatic language, yes that is true but only to affirm a thing further: they did not kill him AND OR crucified him, that is, In the sense of "they did not kill him NOT EVEN he was hanged on the cross).
Also this verse may shed light " Indeed, the penalty1 for those who wage war2 against Allāh and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment" Quran 5-33
I bet the word crucified here mans dying by crucifixion not just hanged on the cross and taken away!! hence when God said "they did not kill him NOR Crucified him" it means he was not killed by mean of crucifixion... I know this may sound confusing that is why I urge the interested reader to read carefully.
If crucifixion has 2 meanings , 1 die, and or 2 just hanged but survived, and Jesus may have been put on the cross but survived, then Quran would be partially imprecise to meet the second meaning because the main meaning of the word Is killed by mean of crucifixion!! And Quran is far from imprecision.
PLUS when in doubt, I think God would not allow it for his messenger to be killed or humiliated that way. If you argue that there were prophets before him who were killed, the answer will be yes but Quran did not say MESSENGERS, and Jesus was Messenger of Almighty, and not in this atrocious way.
I have a theory about the nuances of the substitute theory, if it ever happened, though as you know as Muslims it is not part of our creed to know what happen to Jesus pbuh. Not even the death of any prophet. To the Church it is different story.
And God knows best
Read Quran everyday and never ignore your five daily prayers...❤️❤️❤️❤️🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦 Ben Khalid Mohammed is an amazing Muslim profile on Facebook and this brother is inspiring millions of people to embrace Islam Alhamdulila
@Gary Dalbec better than 1+1+1=1
@Gary Dalbec no I'm talking about pagan wood and flesh
Allahu Akbar Means God Is Great I'm a hindu but proudly say lailah laillallah muhammad un rasoolulla
@@sergeantmajorgross ADAM (PBUH), THE FIRST MAN ON EARTH, LIVED 5,800 YEARS AGO
As per the genealogy of Jesus Christ given in the Bible, from Jesus through Abraham (pbuh) to the first man on earth i.e. Adam (pbuh), Adam appeared on the earth approximately 5800 years ago:
1948 years between Adam (pbuh) and Abraham (pbuh)
Approximately 1800 years between Abraham (pbuh) and Jesus (pbuh)
2000 years from Jesus (pbuh) till today
These figures are further confused by the fact that the Jewish calendar is currently on or about 5800 years old.
There is sufficient evidence from archaeological and anthropological sources to suggest that the first human being on earth was present tens of thousands of years ago and not merely 5,800 years ago as is suggested by the Bible.
The Qur’an too speaks about Adam (pbuh) as the first man on earth but it does not suggest any date or period of his life on earth, unlike the Bible - what the Bible says in this regard is totally incompatible with science.
12. NOAH (PBUH) AND THE FLOOD
The Biblical description of the flood in Genesis chapter 6, 7 and 8 indicates that the deluge was universal and it destroyed every living thing on earth, except those present with Noah (pbuh) in the ark. The description suggests that the event took place 1656 years after the creation of Adam (pbuh) or 292 years before the birth of Abraham, at a time when Noah (pbuh) was 600 years old. Thus the flood may have occurred in the 21st or 22nd Century B.C.
This story of the flood, as given in the Bible, contradicts scientific evidence from archaelogical sources which indicate that the eleventh dynasty in Egypt and the third dynasty in Babylonia were in existence without any break in civilisation and in a manner totally unaffected by any major calamity which may have occurred in the 21st century B.C. This contradicts the Biblical story that the whole world had been immersed in the flood water. In contrast to this, the Qur’anic presentation of the story of Noah and the flood does not conflict with scientific evidence or archaeological data; firstly, the Qur’an does not indicate any specific date or year of the occurance of that event, and secondly, according to the Qur’an the flood was not a universal phenomenon which destroyed complete life on earth. In fact the Qur’an specifically mentions that the flood was a localised event only involving the people of Noah.
It is illogical to assume that Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) had borrowed the story of the flood from the Bible and corrected the mistakes before mentioning it in the Qur’an.
13. MOSES (PBUH) AND PHARAOH OF THE EXODUS
The story of Moses (pbuh) and the Pharaoh of the Exodus are very much identical in the Qur’an and the Bible. Both scriptures agree that the Pharaoh drowned when he tried to pursue Moses (pbuh) and led the Israelites across a stretch of water that they crossed. The Qur’an gives an additional piece of information in Surah Yunus chapter 10 verse 92:
"This day shall We save thee in thy body, that thou mayest be a sign to those who come after thee! But verily, many among mankind are heedless of Our Signs!"
[Al-Qur’an 10:92]
Dr. Maurice Bucaille, after a thorough research proved that although Rameses II was known to have persecuted the Israelites as per the Bible, he actually died while Moses (pbuh) was taking refuge in Median. Rameses II’s son Merneptah who succeeded him as Pharaoh drowned during the exodus. In 1898, the mummified body of Merneptah was found in the valley of Kings in Egypt. In 1975, Dr. Maurice Bucaille with other doctors received permission to examine the Mummy of Merneptah, the findings of which proved that Merneptah probably died from drowning or a violent shock which immediately preceeded the moment of drowning. Thus the Qur’anic verse that we shall save his body as a sign, has been fulfilled by the Pharaohs’ body being kept at the Royal Mummies room in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.
This verse of the Qur’an compelled Dr. Maurice Bucaille, who was a Christian then, to study the Qur’an. He later wrote a book ‘The Bible, the Qur’an and Science’, and confessed that the author of the Qur’an can be no one else besides God Himself. Thus he embraced Islam.
14. QUR’AN IS A BOOK FROM ALLAH
These evidences are sufficient to conclude that the Qur’an was not copied from the Bible, but that the Qur’an is the Furqaan - ‘the Criteria’ to judge right from wrong and it should be used to decipher which portion of the Bible may be considered as the Word of God.
The Qur’an itself testifies in Surah Sajda chapter 32 verse 1 to 3
Alif Laam Meem.
(This is) the revelation of the Book in which there is no doubt - from the Lord of the Worlds.
Or do they say, ‘He has forged it’? Nay, it is the Truth from thy Lord, that thou mayest admonish a people to whom no warner has come before thee: in order that they may receive guidance." [Al-Qur’an 32:1-3]
ADAM (PBUH), THE FIRST MAN ON EARTH, LIVED 5,800 YEARS AGO
As per the genealogy of Jesus Christ given in the Bible, from Jesus through Abraham (pbuh) to the first man on earth i.e. Adam (pbuh), Adam appeared on the earth approximately 5800 years ago:
1948 years between Adam (pbuh) and Abraham (pbuh)
Approximately 1800 years between Abraham (pbuh) and Jesus (pbuh)
2000 years from Jesus (pbuh) till today
These figures are further confused by the fact that the Jewish calendar is currently on or about 5800 years old.
There is sufficient evidence from archaeological and anthropological sources to suggest that the first human being on earth was present tens of thousands of years ago and not merely 5,800 years ago as is suggested by the Bible.
The Qur’an too speaks about Adam (pbuh) as the first man on earth but it does not suggest any date or period of his life on earth, unlike the Bible - what the Bible says in this regard is totally incompatible with science.
12. NOAH (PBUH) AND THE FLOOD
The Biblical description of the flood in Genesis chapter 6, 7 and 8 indicates that the deluge was universal and it destroyed every living thing on earth, except those present with Noah (pbuh) in the ark. The description suggests that the event took place 1656 years after the creation of Adam (pbuh) or 292 years before the birth of Abraham, at a time when Noah (pbuh) was 600 years old. Thus the flood may have occurred in the 21st or 22nd Century B.C.
This story of the flood, as given in the Bible, contradicts scientific evidence from archaelogical sources which indicate that the eleventh dynasty in Egypt and the third dynasty in Babylonia were in existence without any break in civilisation and in a manner totally unaffected by any major calamity which may have occurred in the 21st century B.C. This contradicts the Biblical story that the whole world had been immersed in the flood water. In contrast to this, the Qur’anic presentation of the story of Noah and the flood does not conflict with scientific evidence or archaeological data; firstly, the Qur’an does not indicate any specific date or year of the occurance of that event, and secondly, according to the Qur’an the flood was not a universal phenomenon which destroyed complete life on earth. In fact the Qur’an specifically mentions that the flood was a localised event only involving the people of Noah.
It is illogical to assume that Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) had borrowed the story of the flood from the Bible and corrected the mistakes before mentioning it in the Qur’an.
13. MOSES (PBUH) AND PHARAOH OF THE EXODUS
The story of Moses (pbuh) and the Pharaoh of the Exodus are very much identical in the Qur’an and the Bible. Both scriptures agree that the Pharaoh drowned when he tried to pursue Moses (pbuh) and led the Israelites across a stretch of water that they crossed. The Qur’an gives an additional piece of information in Surah Yunus chapter 10 verse 92:
"This day shall We save thee in thy body, that thou mayest be a sign to those who come after thee! But verily, many among mankind are heedless of Our Signs!"
[Al-Qur’an 10:92]
Dr. Maurice Bucaille, after a thorough research proved that although Rameses II was known to have persecuted the Israelites as per the Bible, he actually died while Moses (pbuh) was taking refuge in Median. Rameses II’s son Merneptah who succeeded him as Pharaoh drowned during the exodus. In 1898, the mummified body of Merneptah was found in the valley of Kings in Egypt. In 1975, Dr. Maurice Bucaille with other doctors received permission to examine the Mummy of Merneptah, the findings of which proved that Merneptah probably died from drowning or a violent shock which immediately preceeded the moment of drowning. Thus the Qur’anic verse that we shall save his body as a sign, has been fulfilled by the Pharaohs’ body being kept at the Royal Mummies room in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.
This verse of the Qur’an compelled Dr. Maurice Bucaille, who was a Christian then, to study the Qur’an. He later wrote a book ‘The Bible, the Qur’an and Science’, and confessed that the author of the Qur’an can be no one else besides God Himself. Thus he embraced Islam.
14. QUR’AN IS A BOOK FROM ALLAH
These evidences are sufficient to conclude that the Qur’an was not copied from the Bible, but that the Qur’an is the Furqaan - ‘the Criteria’ to judge right from wrong and it should be used to decipher which portion of the Bible may be considered as the Word of God.
The Qur’an itself testifies in Surah Sajda chapter 32 verse 1 to 3
Alif Laam Meem.
(This is) the revelation of the Book in which there is no doubt - from the Lord of the Worlds.
Or do they say, ‘He has forged it’? Nay, it is the Truth from thy Lord, that thou mayest admonish a people to whom no warner has come before thee: in order that they may receive guidance." [Al-Qur’an 32:1-3]
Who was crucified if he wasn’t Jesus? The truth is:
Since, Jesus-son of Virgin Mary had many miracles, a few Jewish men started to go villages to deceive people, they introduced themselves as Jesus and his followers.
Since, Romans didn’t know Jesus by face, they arrested and crucified one of those men, because he had introduced himself as Jesus, before had arrested and his friend betrayed him to get some money.
Peter who was one of the disciples, was there and saw that the one who arrested is not Jesus, that’s why Peter denied him three times and he told Romans:
I don’t know him.
The truth about resurrection:
Few days after the crucifixion , friends of the fake Jesus heard that God has taken Jesus to the sky, because of that they secretly moved the body from the tomb to another place to pretend that their friend was real Jesus and raised from the death.
Mary Magdalen who claimed that she was Jesus alive at the tomb was wife or friend of the fake Jesus, that’s why the disciples didn’t believe her claim.
Because of their lies and cheating, the life of Jesus completely mixed with the life of the fake Jesus during centuries.
What happened to Jesus- son of Virgin Mary ?
Since, some of rabbis had plan to kill Jesus, God takes him to the sky when he was alive, before the crucifixion of the fake Jesus.
The last time that the disciples saw Jesus alive was when Jesus was walking on the sea and he tells the disciples:
Don’t believe anyone if says that has seen me from now on.
Later , after the crucifixion of the fake Jesus, Jesus tells the disciples in dream and revelation that he is healthy and he was not crucified.
"First: The Quran attached no salvific importance to his death."- I've always focused in this thought whenever there came a debate regarding the crucifixion or the death of Jesus Christ. Couldn't agree more. I tell everyone, Quran says those that talk as though they are speaking in certainty are surely in doubts, so as a Muslim we just need to understand whether he died or even crucified has ZERO importance for us. Our salvation entirely depends upon God's mercy and NOTHING ELSE.
I am so grateful to have come to learn from you, Sir. Thank you so much for the videos.
I couldn't agree more!
Actually Jesus was not crucified, and that Jesus is not Nabi Isa 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
How Jesus died or never died may not be important to muslim but it sets the foundation of Christianity
Yessssss... Allah's soothing MERCY!
4:53 Dear Paul "they did not kill him nor crucified him" is not explantory notes in bracket, that is lterally what it says in the Arabic, I am native speaker. it is not explanatory note, I am surprise if abdul halim translation did that, I see it is popular to some westerner, as you mentioned, and and thought of reading it my self but haven't got the time..
Below is an excerpt from Chapter VI of “Messiah” by the late Dr. Jerald Dirks:
Having analyzed the name “Jesus bar Abbas,” one is once again forced to confront a somewhat disturbing question, i.e., which of the two men named Jesus was actually crucified? In that regard, it is really no answer at all to say that the one who was crucified was “Jesus who is called the Messiah.” Both men were named Jesus, and both men appear to have been messianic figures. Further, once one understands that Jesus bar Abbas means Jesus the son of the Father, the issue becomes increasingly confusing. Certainly for most Christians, Jesus the son of the Father is the Jesus they hold as the central figure in their religion. Was this Jesus actually released by Pontius Pilate? An affirmative answer to that question is not as unheard of as one might imagine. In point of fact, numerous early Christian writings maintained that it was not Jesus Christ who was crucified.
I’m so glad I’ve found your comment. This is so interesting to me. I was wondering if you could point me to other sources about the early Christians maintaining that someone else had been crucified in Jesus’s stead.
Thank you.
Roy and Mari cruxX there is a video of Jerald dirks (may God have mercy on him, he died 2 years ago.) in the DEEN SHOW and he gave extended talk about this, thanks for reminding me of that.. I agree.. I have a theory which is long but basically if he were another person were the crucified, and since pilot and others were siding tacitly with Jesus, if they crucified that person and kept the crowed at 100 meter distance, any person of that time would look like Jesus because most of the people of that time :
were same clothes
beards
Thin, from working on the field and less food
dark skin
many long haired
so from far away his head dangling to his chest, anyone from 100 meter distance, even 70 m would look like Jesus be that the Judah, Bar abas, or a disciples of Jesus (the youngest who volunteered to be in his place and be his companion in heaven as one story have said in tafsir which they mentioned to show you what was circulating at that time) etc..
they can put the distance under the pretext they don't want to agitate the crowed ( or one the sun is setting .. so it is not clear) if they are siding secretly with Jesus... salam brother and sister
Mari sister, if you are non muslim, or non muslim, and want to debate and raise doubt or question please do, I love debating these things and I may help and we can have fun exploring God's path I am kind and patient, put me to the test if you wish too..
I just complete reading your comment and felt you were researching that theme and love topics like that.. please do if you want to..Have a nice day
Who died on the cross, Jesus or someone else? Please think through of what you are saying. That God made the likeness of Jesus fall on an unspecified person. Now, isn't it an act of deception? Is this befitting to the character of the holy God?
Think through Who was deceived? First of all Mary the mother of Jesus. Can you imagine God deceiving a mother this way & lived the rest of her life thinking that her son was crucified!
Second group of people that were allegedly deceived by God, were Jesus' disciples & followers who some of them were actually present at the Crucifixion & gave us detailed eyewitness accounts. These followers, according to your claim, thought that Jesus died on the cross & rose again on the 3rd day, but actually he didn't. The death & resurrection of Jesus was (& still is) the center piece of the message that they propagated to the rest of the known world at the time. This message continued to spread by Christians for 600 years.
So, think of this, if God did what you allege & Jesus didn't die on the cross, but God made his likeness to fall on an unspecified person. Then God would be responsible for the biggest hoax in history. Is this befitting to the character of the holy God?
If what you claim is true, why would God wait for 600 years to reveal what actually happened by mentioning just one line in a totally different location, about 600 miles away ?
Here is one famous Muslim commentator, Imam Al Razi commenting on the idea of making someone look like another & how illogical & confusing this would be. I apologize that it is in Arabic only.
أنه إن جاز أن يقال : أن الله تعالى يلقي شبه إنسان على إنسان آخر فهذا يفتح باب السفسطة ، فإنا إذا رأينا زيدا فلعله ليس بزيد ، ولكنه ألقى شبه زيد عليه ، وعند ذلك لا يبقى النكاح والطلاق والملك ، وثوقا به ، وأيضا يفضي إلى القدح في التواتر لأن خبر التواتر إنما يفيد العلم بشرط انتهائه في الآخرة إلى المحسوس ، فإذا جوزنا حصول مثل هذه الشبهة في المحسوسات توجه الطعن في التواتر ، وذلك يوجب القدح في جميع الشرائع ، وليس لمجيب أن يجيب عنه بأن ذلك مختص بزمان الأنبياء عليهم الصلاة والسلام ، لأنا نقول : لو صح ما ذكرتم فذاك إنما يعرف بالدليل والبرهان ، فمن لم يعلم ذلك الدليل وذلك البرهان وجب أن لا يقطع بشيء من المحسوسات ووجب أن لا يعتمد على شيء من الأخبار المتواترة ، وأيضا ففي زماننا إن انسدت المعجزات فطريق الكرامات مفتوح ، وحينئذ يعود الاحتمال المذكور في جميع الأزمنة : وبالجملة ففتح هذا الباب يوجب الطعن في التواتر ، والطعن فيه يوجب الطعن في نبوة جميع الأنبياء عليهم الصلاة والسلام ، فهذا فرع يوجب الطعن في الأصول فكان مردودا .
Greetings Mr. Paul,
it is fairly common in Theology to prefer a certain translation over another, but this is not the case here... since the original version is between our hands.
usually a when a translator attempts to explain certain phrases he/she writes that between brackets, but that"s not the case here and the verse is very clear (at least in the original version)
I would quote from the original book if i were to seek accuracy. there are no parentheses in the Quran, namely in the verse quoted.
here i include a link to a recitation to that verse with onscreen text in both Arabic and English. beginning from verse 153 from al-Nisa
ruclips.net/video/qhvcgyUDInw/видео.html
P.S: i just subscribed to your channel today and judging other vlogs i appreciate your method
There was the so called "crucifiction" of Jesus by the roman.. but the one on the cross was not Jesus, but another person who were made to resemble Jesus..
Stupid lies!
Who in their right mind would take Jesus' place and be crucified?
@@jeanclaudepierrot2971
Not willingly.. but God made an enemy of Jesus to.look like Jesus... The roman didn't know he was not Jesus so they crucified him.
@@ukaragen Do you really believe that nonsense?
You think Pontius Pilate and the Romans didn't know what they were doing?
And someone else took Jesus' place?
C' mon get serious!
@@jeanclaudepierrot2971
How did Pontius pilate know it was not Jesus if the man look exactly like Jesus??
@@ukaragen Jesus was led by the Romans all the way to Golgotha or Calvary.
Do you honestly think that the Romans crucified the wrong man?
Really?
Who in their right mind would take Jesus' place and be killed so horendosly?
The Quran affirms that it "appeared" to them. For years I asked myself, how? Certainly the Creator has the power to do whatever He wishes, no doubt about. Then came the age of holograms: fans of Michael Jackson were brought into tears, animals in a German circus entertain the audience, and many other examples. If we were there, at that dramatic moment in history, whatever were playing in front of our eyes, would appear real to us too. Because of their disbelief (although many clear signs were given), the Creator confused them, and confuses many until today.
If Quran leaves out the possibility of Jesus's crucifixion by Romans then what was the point of saying that God raised him up?
The general view is that someone else got crucified (some people say Judas) and that Jesus was brought back to heaven until the time is right for him to come back with imam Mahdi
@@mohammadmussallem1453if jesus was risen to heaven surely this proves he was devine?
“No one of the disciples saw Jesus crucified”.
Mark 14:50, NLT: "Then all his disciples deserted him and ran away."
In a Bible "Secrets of Mark ", says : Issa when he was arrested, a bystander by the name of Simon of Cyrene, carried the cross for him.
The Bible " Secrets of Mark " also added : On the cross was the same man, Simon of Cyrene, however Issa was next to Peter laughing at how he fooled the Romans who believe that he is the one on the cross.
How Many Mary(S) Where At The Site Of Jesus Cross?
Mark 15: 40
“ Some women were watching from a distance.
1- Mary Magdalene
2- Mary the mother of James the younger
3- Mary also called Salome.
Matthew 27:55-56
“ Many women were there, watching from a distance,
1- Mary Magdalene,
2- Mary mother of James & Joseph,
3- Mary mother of Zebedee’s sons( James and John)
A- In Luke: Only Mary of Bethany ( Sister of Martha and Lazarus)
B- In John: 19:25
“ Near the cross of Jesus stood.
1-Mary Magdalene
2- Mary his mother
3-Mary ( Jesus aunt ) the wife of Clopas
then explain why there are many historical accounts from from Jews , roman historian mentioned Jesus cruxifacation did happen? And only quran mentioned the opposites? I always believe historical account than a quran that have no eye witness account of Jesus? And it's the only book that makes a statement without solid proof but just theories written by men.
Thk you for this beautiful explaination brother. May Allah Almighty protect you n your knowledge.🤲
SO AFTER 600 YEARS .....
POOOOOPPP WE HAVE TO PUT EVERYTHING ASIDE AND BELIEVE QURAN???
THAT IS FUNNY.🤩🤩😎😉😉😉
Jesus said he will never die outside Jerusalem (Luke 13:33)
God said that he saved Jesus from death (Hebrew 5:7)
The place, Golgotha, was outside Jerusalem as mentioned by Bible.
Conclusion: Jesus didn't die. He was saved by God.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I have no knowledge of any classical scholars that said the ayah might mean he was crucified by the Romans and would be interested to know who had this opinion. What I really would like to know is how those who hold the opinion he was actually crucified understand the context of the next ayah:
4:158 Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise.
How do they understand the use of the word "bal" = rather/instead? Allah raised him up to himself rather than what?
Crucifixion appeared in Quran and Old Testament in life history of Joseph (pbuh). Other historical events were those of Joshua pbuh and the crucifixion of the Kings are based on Deuteronomy. No knowledge may also means that the Jews has not certain knowledge of crucifixion. Quran provides the answer of question among disputed group of Israeliates - Jews and Christians. .
as far as i know from my arabic, i suppose it's more like a "but" like its more like"instead" but ALLAH knows best wallah!!
in the bible, the story when Jesus apeared to his students in the upper room and they were frightened coz they thought he was a spirit, thinking he was killed, goes well with what Quran tells us, it only apoeared to them so, he also showed them his hands and feet, and ate fish n honey to prove to them that he was not hurt by nails nor was he a spirit, they were not present when the cricifiction accured they fled, so they heard from other ppl,
it was not explained in the Quran who was killed on the cross instead of him, maybe an enemy? A martyr voulnteer ? Or what really was the case, but from the gospel of judas that was found lately, we might guess it was judas maybe, who knows ?
He will explain on his second coming..
Great video..
God the one and alone Blesses you, of course Jesus is still alive cause the Quran is clear without any ambiguity« they did not kill him nor did they crucify him» . Just keep the faith and ask Allah to guide you. Peace be upon you.
I just want to say that I followed along with my actual Quran. It is not an assumption nor interpretation it shouldn't actually be between brackets its clearly stated I found a more accurate translation. (and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him. ) the previous and next verses I think clearly state that nobody actually killed the real Jesus but they saw themselves killing Jesus because god made it appear so. (Rather, Allah raised him up to Himself. And Allah is Almighty, All-Wise.
)
May Allah give you hedaya . Give u right path
Allah has answered your prayer way before you wrote it down.😁
It's really Amazing all writers of the Gospels were not an eyewitnesses where did you get your information plus if you read the Bible you will find them have fled so they didn't see anything. The names of the real disciples were used only check the History of the Bible and when these Gospels were written
Brother Paul has an impeccable library. We thank Allah for you. May he keep you steadfast on his deen.
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
I prefer Jimmy Dean, myself.
الحمد لله على نعمة الاسلام
الحمدلله
واش راك دير هنا ههههه
@@walidmakbouli259 نحوس برك
@@Rebiai كيجاك لفيديو
Jesus was crucified if you don't believe in crucifixion you can't be a Christian.....
God bless you
My only problem with the premise is that if the crucifixion never happened and it was merely shown to Jesus’ disciples to appear he was crucified then how can anyone truly follow an individual that so readily and easily lies to and deceives his followers? Also, after his crucifixion Jesus invited Thomas the disciple to put his hand in Jesus’ side and feel the hole where the soldier stabbed him.
Paul my friend. I think you should have a live dialogue with another renowned Biblical scholar who is an expert on the crucifixion.
Please, contact Dr. Ali Ataie to have a scholarly civil and fruitful discussion.
Dr. Ataie is a professor at Zaytuna college (California, USA).
what a lovely idea
@@BloggingTheology Jesus was at Getsamane garden and prayed.."..oh Abba, please lift this cup from me..." ,but the man who they claimed as Jesus was wailing on the cross calling "Eloi or Elai why have you forsaken me..".
That truly wasn't Jesus for he as an aramaic speaking man never addressed God as such.. It would have been "Abba..Abba why have you..."😉
God the Father must be a cruel God for crucified his son.As God,he can always give forgiveness to any human being who has done a lot of sins .No need to torture n crucified his son.In fact Jesus is not son of God ,but only a Prophet,just like many other prophet before him
Allah SWT would never allow prophet Jesus, the Messiah messenger to die under the hands of people who rejected him and hated him, it wouldn't be just from God who's All-merciful to do such a thing
Brother..finally I have met a person whom i can listen on religion without getting bored.
Lots of love and regards..
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
To answer one of your questions, josephmusemblahblahblah: what was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb? Absolutely nothing useful, except giving the resultant meat to poor, hungry people.
Primitive people BELIEVED that God would look more favorably on them if they killed the animal, which is ridiculous.
You're an embarrassment to rational, kind adult men, as are parts of both your religions, christianity and islam.
*Harmonising the Quranic and Biblical account of the "crucifixion" of Jesus*
The only clear takeaways from Surah 5 verses 157-58 of the Quran are that the Jews failed to kill Jesus and failed to "crucify" him though it appeared to them they succeeded. Yet they still had some doubt on whether they succeeded in killing and crucifying him, have no certain knowledge on the matter and that God raised him onto himself.
Now if we take the reference to the denial that they crucified him to mean they didnt kill him via crucifixion (so an emphasis point, a denial he was debased in death as death via crucifixion in late antiquity was seen as debasement) then a plausible reading of the verses that seeks harmony with the gospels is that it wasnt the crucifixion that caused his death but rather Jesus yielding his spirit to God and God taking his soul up to heaven prior to a "natural" death due to injury. This is supported by another verse in the Quran which says God will cause Jesus to die and raise him onto himself (assumed by most to mean at the end of times but the verse doesn't specify this). This squares up well with the Gospel accounts that suggest Jesus yielded his spirit to God and has Pontius Pilate marvelling at his quick death, indicating an "unnatural" death had occured there.
Thus on this reading the explicit Quranic account is not undermined: The boastful Jews thought they had succeeded in killing him but in fact failed to do so as they were not the cause of his death (the literal definition of killing). Yet this was not visible to them so they assumed he died a "natural" death via crucifixion and therefore had succeeded in killing him. In reality his soul ascended to heaven via his own volition.
With respect to the Jews doubting they had succeeded, a number of points need to be made on plausible readings. First, perhaps they were suffering from cognitive dissonance between what their eyes saw (a dead Jesus via crucifixion) and how quickly he seemed to die (similar to Pontius Pilate). Second, according to Islamic doctrine , the Jews knew Jesus was their Messiah from God (they call him the Messiah, the messenger of Allah in this verse). Perhaps they harboured lingering doubts that they in fact succeeded in killing such a prominent divinely selected figure (cue Old Testament prophecies on the Messiah). And perhaps they heard chatter he was seen alive sometime after. Allahu A'lam.
With respect to Jesus being raised from the dead, the Quran makes no mention of this, either in affirmation or rejection so it cannot be categorically said to be false (we can speculate on why it would be omitted). What it does say is that God countered the Jewish attempt at killing him by raising him unto himself. This could be both literal (raising to heaven, also consistent with some gospel accounts) and metaphorical (Jesus status was elevated as Imam Al Razi states). This reading in no way refutes that he yielded his spirit to the heavens and was reserructed 3 days later. Omission=/= contradiction.
In sum, If we read the two verses in the context of the preceding verses, they are clearly a polemical attack on the rebellious Jews who boasted that they had once again controverted the divine by killing their Messiah from him. The point is that they failed at doing so and Jesus was elavated in rank and to heaven. Detailed explanation on *how* they failed and all the details that followed (including whether Jesus in fact had died via other means) is not the focus here. That regardless of what happened, Jesus and ultimately God won (and in the Sunnah Jesus will return victorious) and the rebellious Jews lost. (The reading that Jesus yielded his spirit and God seized it is consistent with this) Is this not the ultimate message of verses 157-158? That they planned and Allah Planned and Allah is the best of planners?
Subhanallah!!!
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
You, Paul, are demolishing what another Paul invented, near 2,000 years ago now.
The more I watch your vlogs the more I appreciate your contribution towards the understanding of religions .
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
very strange that you are trying to prove us wrong using a book with the following - surahs 4;34 5:51 9:29 4:157 3:104 with instructions on how to persecute and to deceive - Taqqiya - Muda'rat, Kitman, Tawriya, Taysir, Darura - Murana, Hiyal, Muta & nikkah. and how about Surah 65:4 & rules of Shariat.
Amazing how you digging so deep love it
_>Matthew 26:39 "Jesus FELL ON HIS FACE and prayed."_
*Jesus prayed like Muslims. If Jesus is God, why pray/talk to himself?*
_>Psalms 22:1 Jesus said: "MY GOD, why have You forsaken Me?_
*If Jesus is God, how can he have a God?*
_>Mark 10:18: "Why call me good?” said Jesus. “No one is good-EXCEPT GOD alone."_
*Jesus separates himself from God:*
*Bible promotes slavery:* Leviticus 25:44-46 "You may buy of the residents among you... they will become your property... you can make them slaves for life."
_>Would God promote slavery?_
*Quran ends slavery:* Quran 90:12-13 "What may let you know the path of righteousness? It is to free a slave."
_>Or would God promote ending slavery?_
*Bible has 100+ contradictions:* Example: Matthew 1:16 "Jacob begot Joseph" - Luke 3:23 "Joseph, son of Heli"
_>Is Joseph the son of Heli or Jacob? Clearly corrupted._
_>Would God send a book of contradictions corrupted by humans? Or one still in its original language and preserved/memorized since revelation (Quran)?_
*>Worship the creator, not the creation! Open your heart, humble yourself to the truth: Islam :)*
Quran 2:255 “God! There is no god but He, the ever-living, all-sustaining. No slumber nor sleep seizes Him. To Him belongs all that is in the heavens and on earth. Who can possibly intercede with Him without His permission? He ˹fully˺ knows ˹everything presently˺ ahead of them and what is before them, but no one can encompass any of His knowledge-except what He wills ˹to reveal˺. His throne extends over the heavens and the earth, and their preservation fatigues Him not. For He is the Most High, the Supreme ˹in glory˺.”
Quran 112:1-4 "Say: He is God, the One and Only; God, the Eternal, Absolute; He begets not, nor is He begotten; And there is nothing comparable to Him."
~Share this :)
637
Very good analysis ... relaxed and clear...
Glad you liked it!
@@BloggingTheology may I have your email address please?
@@BloggingTheology I have tried the following email address from you:paulawilliams007@btinternet.com but the email didn’t delivered.
@@BloggingTheology Hello Mr. William,
I have watched the following videos from your RUclips channel Blogging Theology.
Jesus said ‘Allah’ not ‘Deus’ and was Jesus a Prophet sent by God in the earliest Gospels ?
I could have enriched my writings if I could add this message in my writings. But honestly speaking that I am not able to get the books for my collection .
Would you please be kind enough to give me some images from the books with references?
Like hard copy or soft copy, as it is comfortable for you.
Like you have said that “Jesus said Allah “..and
The passage from the book “ the Changing Faces of Jesus “.
Actually I add in my writings all sort of references with proof less then my own thoughts because that one enrich the authenticity of my writing.
@@BloggingTheology please help if possible
Excellent ! My brother in deen you are doing an outstanding job.
Your point from Todd’s book ie appearing to jews is interesting but what about the next verse/line --That We (God) raised him up and we have the power to decide. Jews could not have crucified/punished anyone publicly as Romans governed and so they had to lobby Romans. And being successful at it one can say we did it. Just a thought..
May Allah guide us all. Ameen
Could it be like this:-
Its God who takes and gives life. Therefore although the agents were jews, its God who actually took jesus’ life!!! problem solved.
Sorry Paul for this belated addition to comments on your able summary of the general Muslim position on the claim of Jesus's crucifixion.
A major departure from this position is provided by the Ahmadi and Qadiani (both not generally accepted by mainstream as Muslims). These two groups, one of which runs the Woking Mosque in Surrey, believe that the interpretation of the Quran does not preclude the nailing of Jesus to the cross. That action, however, did not end in death and Jesus cannot be said to have been crucified ( which means to put someone to death on the cross).
Apart from any explanation by officials from the Woking Mosque, the following two publications would be useful :
Jesus in Heaven on Earth by Khwaja Nazir Ahmad, and
The Quran, English translation and commentary by Muhammad Ali. Thank you for keeping the discussion alive since I have followed this topic since the year 1961.
Hello Sir, I think regarding this matter it's important also to read and study Chapter 3 (al imran) of the Holy Quran versus 45 to 55. Because I think it gives extra explanation about Jesus's last days on Earth (peace and blessings upon him). I think verse 55 in particular many scholars see it as an evidence that he wasn't killed or harmed in anyway by his enemies. I only started to watch your videos a week ago and I am already a big fan, thank you and god bless you.
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
LOL! Jesus mother was at the foot of the cross. Are you saying his mother couldn’t tell her son from a stranger? Also, the tomb was empty. What happened to the body of the crucified man? You have no idea what you’re talking about.
I found your channel today. Its amazing . I like your academic searches .i just want to say that no chrestians can prove that jesus was crucified . Even the bible couldnt .they say that jesus will be absent for 3 days like jonah was in the belly of fish " For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." Jesus, (Matthew, 12:40).
But jonah didnt die in the belly of fish . So if he is like jonah .we must believe that he didnt die .and jesus didnt spend three days in the tomb .he spent two night and one day .friday night . Saturday day and night . the sunday before dawn he was not in the tomb . Jesus was not crucified .he was not a god he didnt died for our sins cause this contradict the old testament its self before it contradict islam or logic
The Qurans view of the crucifixion of Christ is irrelevant. The Scriptures preceded the Quran and was written nearer the time of Christ . Both the Old Testament (predicted the crucifixion of Jesus ) and the New Testament confirmed the crucifixion of Christ. This was the teaching of the early Church and even non Christians scholars such as Muslims hero , Bart Ehrman, has confirmed the historical fact that Jesus WAS crucified.
Praise God He is risen!
About the crucifixion of Jesus is detailed in the Bible, not compliance with the eye witness of any body.
It is only presumptions of Roman soldiers. While they went to seize Jesus, with Judea, Jesus was already taken by God almighty. Judea went to the place where in Gesthamane, he could not find Jesus, so soldiers took Jedea for Jesus. In the gospel of Barnabas page 60, mentioned that Judea was taken by Roman soldiers for the crucifixion and crucified him.
Exactly, it doesn’t matter how and who died, the purpose of the Quran is to convey guidance that are relevant in your personal life and how one can use the versus in benefit.
I posted a link to Quran’s Surah Yusuf (Joseph) lecture by Nauman Ali Khan, he makes some great notes pointing out how the Quran narrative is different and only covers things that are relevant for example no mention of his mother because it isn’t the point of what Allah is trying to convey.
Please take a look at that!
ruclips.net/video/U79a-7kRWJY/видео.html
This lying doesnt help
@Gary Dalbec Yeah, may be his scrifice was good for him in the hereafter. If you read the divine revelations, God never lets his selected people die like a swine. Quran 3:55; When God said, "O Jesus, indeed I will give you death and raise you to Myself and purify you from those who disbelieve and make those who follow you superior to those who disbelieve until the Day of Resurrection. Then to Me is your return, and I will judge between you concerning that in which you used to differ.
@Gary Dalbec No my friend, the personal interpretation of Quran has misleaded many scholars. I would say, muslim thought and islamic tradition has failed in the modern times.
Quran denies the second coming of jesus whilst majority of muslims believe in second coming of Jesus. There is not a single verse in Quran that couldn't be justified.
@Gary DalbecAh! I wish you would've known Arabic as a second language, the taste of literature is out from this world. I agree, muslims took the cover of Hadith, koran has been debunked by many clever minds. But, it's all matter of time.
On the people of Noah, flood came; on the people of Muhammad, death with a sword came.
This happens when a Prophet sums up his task and isolates bad and good people. God shows his hell on the extreme disbelieves.
Now, if someone in this era tries to create Noah's flood or Muhammed's death as a religious activity. Anybody would call him a dumb idiot extremist. Muslims forget that God is talking to Muhammad and same mistake is done by the Scholars, they think a tribal God is telling present muslims to become militants.
@@SarmadKausar Quran doesnt deny the second coming of Jesus. I too was thinking that there is no verse in Quran which speak about 2nd coming unless I have read myself in the last ramadan 2020. It says " and all the people of the book will believe on Jesus before his death, and he will be a witness upon them on the judgement day".
What does it mean?
Simply means that Jesus has not died yet. Also, for death one should have to be upon earth, in his body+spirit complete form, then spirit can be taken out of body. Plus ahl-e-kitab (people of book) also includes jews. Right now, jews do not believe on Hazrat Issa as a prophet so this verse clearly means that Issa will come upon earth again and then all people of the books i.e. jews, christians and muslims will believe him as the prophet and messenger from Allah and then he will be died and then he will be on the judgment day, a witness upon them (whom he left at the time of his death). Wallahu Alim.
Writers of Quran is laying! Christianity and the Bible is older than Islam and Quran for more than 1,400 years! How can they say that their knowledge is more correct? 🤣🤣🤣
Very well articulated and so easy to understand. Really appreciate your efforts brother.. thank you kindly.
You are very welcome
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
".... and they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not. "
(Qur'an, al-Nisa, 4:157)
Well then, what happened to Jesus ('alaihial-Salaam)7 The Qur'an has explained what happened. It has made five explanatory statements:
Firstly, the Qur'an declared that the Jews did not kill Jesus:
"...but they killed him not.... "
(Qur'an, al-Nisa, 4:157)
Secondly, it declared that they did not crucify him:
"...nor did they crucify him.... "
(Qur'an, al-Nisa, 4:157)
Thirdly it declared that Allah the Supreme reclaimed him (i.e., took his soul). There are, in fact, two such statements in the Qur'an:
"And behold, Allah said: Oh Jesus, I (will) reclaim you (i.e., I will take your soul, - the word used is Wafaat), and raise you to Myself and clear you (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme . . .
(Qur'an, Ale 'Imran, 3:55)
"And behold Allah will say (on the Day of Judgment) Oh Jesus, the son of Mary, did you say unto men: worship me and my mother as Gods besides Allah? He will say: Glory be to Thee! Never could I say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing you would surely have known it. You know what is in my heart, and I know not what is in Your heart. For You know infill all that is hidden. Never did I say to them anything except that which You ordered me to say, to wit: Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord; and I was a witness over them while I dwelt among them, but when You reclaimed me (i.e., took my soul - the word used is again Wafaat). You became the watcher over them, and You are a witness to all things.
(Qur'an, al-Maida, 5:116-117)
If Allah Most High took the soul of Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam) and did not return it, then that would have constituted Maut (death). But the Qur'an insists that he was not killed (nor crucified):
" ....for most certainly they did not kill him.... "
(Qur'an,
Well then, what did Allah Most High do with the soul after He took it? Was it possible, for example, that He returned the soul to the body? Can such a thing take place?
The Qur'an affirms that Allah Most High does return some souls after having taken them from the body:
"Allah reclaims the souls at (the time of) death; and those that die not He reclaims (their souls) during sleep (i.e., those whose souls are not taken while they are awake will experience it while they are asleep). Then for those on whom He has passed the decree of death (maut), He keeps back (i.e., the soul is not allowed to return to the body): but the rest He returns (to their bodies) for a term appointed. Verily in this are Signs for those who reflect. "
(Qur'an, al-Zumar, 39:42)
Did this take place in the case of Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam)! The answer is to be found in the next two statements of the Qur'an.
Fourthly the Qur'an stated that Allah, the All-Powerful, made it 'appear' that Jesus {'alaihi al-Salaam) was killed. This was made possible either by replacing 'one thing' with 'another', or by replacing 'one person' with 'another' (tashbih). Thus those who were observing the event were convinced that Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam) had, in fact, died (Maut):
".... but so it was made to appear to them.... " (Yusuf Ali)
" ....but it only seemed to them (as if it had been) so.... "(M. Asad)
(Qur'an, al-Nisa, 4:157)
It is now possible for us to answer the question: Well then, what did Allah Most High do with the soul after He took it? One possible answer to that question is that Allah Most High substituted one thing for another (tashbih):
Allah Most High took the soul of Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam) while he was still on the cross,
Allah Most High thus convinced those who were observing the event that Jesus (• alaihi al-Salaam) was dead,
Allah Most High then returned the soul of Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam) after he was taken down from the cross and when no one was around to observe. He was then taken up into the heavens from whence he would descend one day.
The only difference from the accepted Christian belief and the above interpretation of the Qur'an is that the period of time which elapsed between the event on the cross and the ascension of Jesus was one in which Christians recognized him as dead. In the above interpretation of the Qur'an, however, he was not recognized as dead precisely because the soul was returned to the body.
Those who object to the above possible explanation of the Qur'an argue that Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam) was never placed on the cross. They interpret the Qur'anic statement "they did not crucify him" to imply that he was never placed on the cross. They come to this conclusion on the basis of their view that crucifixion (in the sense in which the Qur'an uses the term) implies simply being put on the cross and does not necessarily require such a person to actually die on the cross. Commenting on Surah al-Maidah, 5:36, the commentator of the Qur'an, Ibn Kathir, holds the view that cmcifixion necessarily implies death.
The alternative interpretation to the above is that Allah Most High substituted one person for another (tashbih) so that someone else replaced Jesus ( 'alaihi al- Salaam) on the cross, and that person was crucified in place of Jesus Calaihi al- Salaam). TMs is the theory of 'substitution'. It is an opiiuon and, like all opinions, is subject to the qualification: Allahu 'alam (Allah, the Supreme, knows best!). There are many distinguished scholars of Islam, however, who subscribe to the theory of substitution. Those who object to this interpretation argue that it ascribes to Allah Most High a manifest act of injustice since it declares of Him that He caused an innocent man (i.e., innocent of any of the charges leveled against Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam)) to be crucified in place of Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam). But Allah Most High has repeatedly declared that no soul would bear the burden of another soul (al-'Anam, 6:164; Banu Israil, 17:15; al-Fatir, 35:18; al-Zumar, 39:7; al-Najm, 53:38).
Fifthly the Qur'an makes a statement to the effect that Allah Most High raised Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam) unto Himself:
"Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise. "
(Qur'an, al-Nisa, 4:158)
The Qur'an then went on to explain that every soul (Nafs) must taste death (Arabic - Maut):
"Every soul must taste death (maut). And only on the Day ofludgment shall you be paid your full recompense (for your works)... "
(Qur'an, Ale 'Imran, 3:185)
Since Allah Most High has declared that every soul (Nafs) must taste death, it implies that Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam), also, if he possessed a soul (Nafs) must taste death (Maut). The question therefore arises: Did Jesus ('alaihi al-Salaam) possess a soal(Nafs)7 Was he a human being? And since we know that he was the son of Mary, we must also ask: Was Mary a human being?
Paul was not disciple of Jesus
Paul is an imposter who derailed the early Christians and invented the Trinity. A pure scumbag.
@@abu-sulaimanel-bushnaq8052 - I am a muslim and I don't think st paul did anything wrong
@@theguyver4934 That's because you're ignorant.
Maybe look at the Roman records before believing accounts written 500 years or so later. Nice plug for your mates book though. Should sell a few copies.
Great video.. definitely more informative than sc shouting videos. I like to see a video about western academia the pros and cons in religious studies..
The birth of Jesus was a miracle so was his departure. Human sperm was not involved in his birth and human ways of killing were not involved in his departure. His whole being is a big mystery yet he was a real person in bone and flesh. Any one digging more in to the matters related to Jesus will get Confused!
That's the BEST explanation I heard in decades of me chasing this quandary and question as a MUSLIM myself. Muslim scholars really have never been able to fully explore and extrapolate a more definitive opinion on the cruxifiction. We as Muslims do believe that Christ was NOT "crucified" in the most literal Christian sense. But that's as far as we go. We revere Isa "Christ" (PBUH) as a messenger just as much as Muhammad (PBUH) with the later being loved and adored much more. But in reverence Muslim scholars I think have stayed away from really extrapolating a verdict because in the end...to a Muslim it really doesn't matter. ONLY ALLAH matters and HIS instructions matter far more. Great clarification on this subject though...many thanks!!
glad it helped!
Dear Adam, are you a revert/convert? The classical view of Muslim scholars on crucifixion is based on their knoweldge of how God uses the language too.. When Allah's , SW, deny a thing with a word or affirm a thing with a word frequently if it encompasses the 2 meanings of the word. both meaning apply. Notice "they killed him not NOR crucify him" What is the obvious first read on this? that is the answer. example when God said Roman was defeated but will win "fei adna" adna mean the closest land (to Arabia) but Adna means to lowest, and both meaning apply, dead sea area is the closest to Arabia and it is the lowest land on earth (ardh) not sea.
Add to that God deny the killing AND the crucifixion process
Ali Ataie, insinuate , and Shabir pointed out that crucifixion has 2 meaning:
1. crucified and died on the cross
2. crucified but then taken down from the cross without dying.
That is true, but:
if it is the First meaning Allah saying they did not Kill him debunk the first meaning of word "Crucifixion".
If the second meaning happened (nailed to the cross but survived), then the quran would be partially inaccurate because it would miss the first meaning of the word crucifixion (that is he was crucified AND DIED, on the cross). reader need to read that again.. it requires concentration..
Further, If God said "but they did not CRUCIFY him" alone without the verb "kill" then that would be a different story, (it open the possibility that they may or MAY NOT killed him by other mean).
Another point to consider, if the 1st meaning of crucifixion happened, he was killed, : Allah would be saying the did not kill him (that is enough) NOR killed him (by mean of hanging on the cross), that is unnecessary given the first word "they did not kill him which encompass death by crucifixion) so why God added NOR crucified him? this would render a redundant word, though you can argue saying that Quran sometimes use emphatic language, yes that is true but only to affirm a thing further: they did not kill him AND OR crucified him, that is, In the sense of "they did not kill him NOT EVEN he was hanged on the cross).
Also this verse may shed light " Indeed, the penalty1 for those who wage war2 against Allāh and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment" Quran 5-33
I bet the word crucified here mans dying by crucifixion not just hanged on the cross and taken away!! hence when God said "they did not kill him NOR Crucified him" it means he was not killed by mean of crucifixion... I know this may sound confusing that is why I urge the interested reader to read carefully.
If crucifixion has 2 meanings , 1 die, and or 2 just hanged but survived, and Jesus may have been put on the cross but survived, then Quran would be partially imprecise to meet the second meaning because the main meaning of the word Is killed by mean of crucifixion!! And Quran is far from imprecision.
PLUS when in doubt, I think God would not allow it for his messenger to be killed or humiliated that way. If you argue that there were prophets before him who were killed, the answer will be yes but Quran did not say MESSENGERS, and Jesus was Messenger of Almighty, and not in this atrocious way.
I have a theory about the nuances of the substitute theory, if it ever happened, though as you know as Muslims it is not part of our creed to know what happen to Jesus pbuh. Not even the death of any prophet. To the Church it is different story.
And God knows best
I agree and by the way tafsir is not something that should not be questioned.. but in this regard , on this verse, I think they understood the verse perfectly, and got it right, and add some of what they heard from israeliat as entertainment of what other have said .. they never meant to be believed, even the authors of tafsir never expected us to believe what they say outside of Quran from isaraeliaat but they pick it up as interesting notes of what was circulating back then.
And as you know , to us Muslims, we follow Quran and a death of any prophet, any one, has no bearing to our salvation issue.
But when we debate Christians we try to see all views, debate it with them.. because it is central issue to them...
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
And its very clear, have been told by the Almighty God to his messenger prophet Muhamad Pbuh that Jesus was replaced on the cross with someone else. God knows Best.
Paul shared his knowledge from verious books with us we must appreciate him and support his efforts ❤️
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
And because of their saying (in boast), "We killed Messiah ‘Îsâ (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allâh," - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them [the resemblance of ‘Îsâ (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man)], and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Îsâ (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) عليهما السلام]:
- translation by Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali & Muhammad Muhsin Khan
QURAN CHAPTER 4 VERSE 157
Excellent explanation. Thank you!
Alla made it to appear as it was Jesus crucified but alla swapped him .humans are limited,Alla is all knowing then who is wrong here is it christian tough believe on crucified Jesus or Alla lying to us by exchanging Jesus?
To Alla and deceived followers why was it made to appear someone was crucified,what was the purpose of that man crucifixion.
What's the meaning of EXODUS 12 the lambs blood for salvation!
What's the meaning of this
Isaiah 53:7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
John 1:29the next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
What was the purpose of sacrificing a lamb?
I'm sorry what we follow is consistent hence no room for antichrist
Why would that part of the verse be in parenthesis when it's clearly in the Arabic? Also there are a number of supporting verses and hadiths, I don't think there's really any scope for the other beliefs when you look at things holistr
Important correction to Paul's conclusion in the minute 21:00: The verse is more than clear and precise (in Arabic) leading the reader/listener to deny The crucifixion and death of Jesus and to believe instead that he was made to ascend to his creator. In Arabic, there is no way to even remotely understand that the verse carries the denial of the Jews being the perpetrators of the crucifixion while throwing the blame onto the Romans.
What do you mean? “They” is referring to Jews, it most definitely is denying that the Jews killed/crucified Jesus but it is not at all negating Jesus’ crucifixion
@@lets_wrapitup You're wrong here. The Quranic Verses categorically deny the crucifixion (and the death) Of "Jesus"!
Examples:
○ {And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain.} [4:103]
○ {On the contrary, Allah exalted him to Himself. And Allah is Mighty, Wise.} [4:159]
please do study the matter before wrongly speaking in such confident tone.
As a Muslim and an Arab I can tell you that in no way is the verse in parenthesis, and is indeed the point of the verse (there are no side notes within the text of the Quran) BUT you're absolutely right in regards to how that's been interpreted by Muslim scholars, some believe that the "made to believe" part refers to the whole event while others believe it only refers to the death part and both are credible interpretations of the verse even though they can't be true simultaneously... The verse says "they killed him not nor had they crucify him, but rather they were made to believe as such" so the last part could theoretically be in reference to Jesus PBUH not being crucified (someone was crucified in his stead) , OR it could mean that the death on the cross didn't Infact happen because the condition of death on a cross wasn't fulfilled and Jesus didn't actually die on the cross but "they were made to believe" he actually died ... I tend to lean towards the latter interpretation but I can understand where the other interpretation comes from.
So in a nutshell Muslims argue whether Jesus PBUH actually was on the cross or someone who was made to look like him... What both parties agree on however is the fact that Jesus did NOT actually die on the cross (which means that they all agree that Jesus in fact was spared death as he asked)... At least that's what I took from all my reading on the subject , I'm a mere student, not a scholar by any means so ALLAH knows best.
He does not know how to recite al-quran and most likely does not understand quranic arabic ( since modern arabic is not exactly the same as Quranic arabic) . So he is at mercy at english translations. In fact i feel he did not even choose a good translation. There are better translation written by linguists. Still he is doing a fairly good job i think
This is actually intresting will follow your videos regularly
Welcome aboard
"In the most critical juncture of Jesus' life, all his disciples forsook him and fled" according to the modern day Gospels. On top of that BT, have you done a vid on the Sign of Jonah? Would be interesting to get your take. According to Jesus' (PBUH) quote in the modern day Gospels, the only Sign (miracle) given to an "evil and adulterous generation is the Sign of Jonah". "For as Jonah was in the belly of the whale, so shall Jesus be in the heart of the Earth." Jonah (PBUH) was expected to die, but he didn't. Christian scholarship says, no, it's the time factor of 3 days and 3 nights mentioned by Jesus (which is not the miracle of Jonah btw). On top of that, Jesus according to the NT was risen in less than 3 days and 3 nights, so it does not make any sense. In addition, Jesus asks his disciples to give him fish and honeycomb to eat. "Touch me and see, for a spirit has no flesh and bones". Doesn't make any sense. The Quran clears up the confusion.