The True Project of Kant's First Critique: Transcendental Idealism
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- We will discuss all this and more at my upcoming Kant course: halkyonacademy...
Seminars begin April 20th at 6pm UK time. So enrol today and I see you inside!
The common misconceptions about Kant’s First Critique are 1) that it is an epistemology and 2) that Kant combines rationalism and empiricism. But he does neither. In fact, Kant refutes both empiricism and rationalism - and had he written something as benign as an epistemology he would not have achieved the revolution of thought.
Join my Kant course 2024 halkyonacademy.teachable.com/p/kant-s-critical-philosophy1
Seminars begin April 20th
Thank you so much for this video! I am currently reading the Critique for the first time and find its horizon of knowledge somewhat depressing compared to what Hegel for example promises to be knowable. But I think you made your point very clear, that it is not merely a fundamental reshape of knowledge, but thinking as well...
Thank you.
No Hegel without Kant. Hope to see you at my course next week
Thank you!! cleared up my misunderstandings of Kant handily.
When I was 17, I asked my philosophy professor how to read Kant, and he told me better to read Schopenhauer and then Kant, since it would be much easier then to follow what Kant was saying, so I did. More than 10 years later I think I understood why he was saying that... yet I cannot help but wonder if I would be completely different person if I have never interacted with the books of Schopenhauer, or whether some access to Kant's thought has been inavailable for me due to the influence of Schopenhauer.
He was dead wrong.
@@JohannesNiederhauser Yeah, I got that, but I am afraid that kind of approach remains still today one of the main ways that Kant is taught , by reducing everything through the lens of Schopenhauer or by simply psychologizing dead people or maybe even worse, through pure analytic philosophy and battle with terms and definitions and justified true beliefs.
@@MrOksim Join my course and see the light 🌞
very well done
You most interestingly said what one cannot stop with Kant conclusions because we pay the high price of losing our connection of the “ousia” within particulars of traditional metaphysics. Which I agree.
My question is who do we end with? Personally I hope you don’t say Hegel, because I cannot at any moment concede to agree (what I believe to be a correct interpretation of Hegel) with a Monistic worldview given in his Absolute Idealism.
Long post short, who finishes Kant philosophy in which we don’t lose the concept ot Essence and the knowledge of essences?
well done
What would you say about theists who say you cant have a rational world view without a god?
Kommt bezüglich Kant noch etwas auf Ihrem deutschsprachigen Kanal?
What is the name of your book on Heidegger? I would like to take a look at it.
Heidegger on death and being (Springer 2021)
a synthetic apriori judgment in a Unity synthesized will most certainly lead one to experience" -And that experience greater than any "me" or I that is know. And such is possible to And in Experience. And yet the I or me remains.
and such is possible in experience