Praise to your enterprise Johannes, you're paving a royal road! After reading Plato's Republic, I'm definitely self-reading this course, maybe with some session. I loved the way you presented Kant's historical role, and how you bring him to us! This question is probably out of the scope of what you can answer here, but... In you mentioning Kant's turned unification of Though and Being after Hume's (and others) crude skepticism, a thought arose in me about the distinction of the physical and meta-physics, especially how the latter has become subordinated to the former. It's been suggested that the term 'meta-physics' comes from Andronicus of Rhodes editorial decision, to denote the books after Aristotle's Physica as 'Meta-Physica'. In modernity and now, this term Meta-physics has gotten a mystical or extra-dimensional meaning. What role do you think the naming of this coined-term 'meta-physics', has come to play in the splitting, and then subordinative turning of Thought and Being in history? Hopefully this question is not seen as falling into any blaming.
Great elucidations, as deciphering the philosophical profundities. Humbly placing a request for a comprehensive elaboration on Kants, noumenon. Not sure I fully grasp Kants, philosophical connotations ? 😊 Truly appreciate your thoughtful words.
This comment on how airplanes were developed at 17:30 is interesting: "the attempt to mimic birds and how they fly didn't achieve anything..." I wouldn't be at all surprised if eventually similar observations on artificial intelligence are made, e.g. "the attempt to mimic humans and how they think didn't achieve anything..."
Praise to your enterprise Johannes, you're paving a royal road! After reading Plato's Republic, I'm definitely self-reading this course, maybe with some session. I loved the way you presented Kant's historical role, and how you bring him to us!
This question is probably out of the scope of what you can answer here, but...
In you mentioning Kant's turned unification of Though and Being after Hume's (and others) crude skepticism, a thought arose in me about the distinction of the physical and meta-physics, especially how the latter has become subordinated to the former. It's been suggested that the term 'meta-physics' comes from Andronicus of Rhodes editorial decision, to denote the books after Aristotle's Physica as 'Meta-Physica'. In modernity and now, this term Meta-physics has gotten a mystical or extra-dimensional meaning. What role do you think the naming of this coined-term 'meta-physics', has come to play in the splitting, and then subordinative turning of Thought and Being in history?
Hopefully this question is not seen as falling into any blaming.
Thank you very much. This is a great insight. I hope you join the seminars! So we can discuss this further
Love this hope you grow bigger and I am looking forward to future insights
Great elucidations, as deciphering the philosophical profundities. Humbly placing a request for a comprehensive elaboration on Kants, noumenon. Not sure I fully grasp Kants, philosophical connotations ? 😊 Truly appreciate your thoughtful words.
This comment on how airplanes were developed at 17:30 is interesting: "the attempt to mimic birds and how they fly didn't achieve anything..." I wouldn't be at all surprised if eventually similar observations on artificial intelligence are made, e.g. "the attempt to mimic humans and how they think didn't achieve anything..."