Matt Segall - The Intricacies and Insights of Whitehead’s Process Thought

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @windsock0924
    @windsock0924 4 месяца назад +1

    Excellent and enriching conversation. Thank you.

  • @willtheharper2484
    @willtheharper2484 2 года назад +7

    A rich conversation. Thank you both!

  • @milliern
    @milliern 2 года назад +5

    Fantastic conversation. What a joy to listen to.

  • @DaestrumManitz
    @DaestrumManitz 2 года назад +4

    Really enjoyed this incredibly rich, penetrating conversation and sharing of ideas.

  • @idealdabbler
    @idealdabbler 2 года назад +3

    Fascinating, I consider it the second-best find of my day, the best being you and Bruce with David Sloane Wilson.

  • @LeoMadrid
    @LeoMadrid Год назад +3

    Excellent talk!

  • @FlavioLanfranconi
    @FlavioLanfranconi 2 года назад +1

    Looking forward to the next occasion to listen to your conversations!
    🙏🏼

  • @charlesdavis7087
    @charlesdavis7087 Год назад

    At last someone who has really gotten into The Philosophy of Organism. I love and steal from Whitehead all the time. He and Alfred Korzybski and his foundational work on General Semantics, and the Institute of General Semantics. I been a student of these two extraordinary beings for over Fifty years. Have you gotten in Korzybski? Most people can't read his stuff either. Blessings all over your world.... If you would like an interesting insight on "conscious immorality" just let me know.

  • @mandys1505
    @mandys1505 Год назад +1

    Was there any influence or interaction between the thought of Whitehead and Alfred Korzybski ?

    • @mandys1505
      @mandys1505 Год назад

      😄⚘well, i think that Korzybski was a big fan of Whitehead, but i really wonder if there was any recognition mutually

  • @geoffreynhill2833
    @geoffreynhill2833 Год назад +1

    Whitehead sounds like a Good Bloke! 😉 (Green Fire, UK) 🌈🦉

  • @Frederer59
    @Frederer59 Год назад

    No Ken Wilber books on your shelf?

  • @charlesdavis7087
    @charlesdavis7087 Год назад +1

    The idea that G.O.D. might actually be Incarnate... as "the fellow companion" but also... as The All That Is. Present as the omnipresent universe, in which we live and move and have our being (St. Paul) and absolutely fundamental for The Mystics throughout the ages man. I think we should make pantheism into a science, Scientific Pantheism, and Interspecies Communication mandatory in grade school. That's me being silly, of course, but never lose your sense of humor. And did you know that Korzybski showed a way to scientifically measure levels of consciousness.... of atoms, of plants, to animals, and what their levels of interests are? The ability to alter one electro chemical interactions is immense. Maybe we need a ew Dept of Medicine. What's the neurological connection between Love, Light/Color and Consciousness... or is there one? New studies opening up. Blessings in Ascension. Upon This Our Ishtar/Easter Tide, 2023 AD.

    • @geoffreynhill2833
      @geoffreynhill2833 Год назад

      Thanks for the Korzybski tip! 🤔 (Green Fire, UK) 🌈🦉