Mazda 6 SkyActiv-G acceleration 0-100, 1/4 mile, 60-100, 80-120 | 2023 | GJ | FWD | GPS results
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
- 2023 Mazda 6 SkyActiv-G 20th Anniversary
2.5L 4-cyl N/A engine
194 hp & 258 Nm
6-speed automatic
FWD
19-inch wheels
weight: ~1.540 kg
claimed 0-100: 8.1 sec
00:01 car presentation
00:28 car stats
00:48 launch
01:09 60-100 km/h
01:30 80-120 km/h
01:56 0-100 km/h (x2)
02:43 1/4 mile run
03:17 catch the speedo
03:30 speedo vs GPS
03:39 results sheet
Pretty interesting, I like that Mazda has a different approach to engines & transmissions.
I share your enthusiasm regarding the engines, but i have mixed to meh feelings when it comes to transmissions 🤭
@@AcceleratingCars it's not as good as AISIN8, but better than a dct or CVT.
@@dragospahontuLa acceleratie din roll CVTul e cel mai bun ca tine turatia fix la max power permanent.
Este un canal din arabia saudita unde se întrec pe loc drept. Nissan Maxima 3.5 V6 CVT bate rău Passat VR6 3.6 cu DSG și imi pare ca și Camry V6 cu automata 8 trepte.
@@Eugen-E da dar contează și feelingul la condus
@@dragospahontu Feelingul e subiectiv. Nu poți spune că e mai bun ceea ce "iti da feeling".
Mazda attracts with innovations - SkyActiv 2.5L !!!
A nice color that I don't recognize from the Mazda color palette.
Out of curiosity, I looked at the Mazda configurator. and it turned out that it be a color reserved for limited version of the Mazda 6.
Greetings from Poland.
Hi, Jarek, thanks for your comment! That particular model i tested was a high spec trim level and a special one (i think). It was called 20th Anniversary.
I suppose that it is not easy for Mazda to compete against turbo engines. In the flexibility accelerations it can be seen. But in the real life not only acceleration is important. When it comes to reliability, N/A engines may be a good choice.
Thanks for your comment, pretty much on point, as usual 😉 Agree.
Mazda6 2.5 N/A not slower than a Renault Talisman 1.6 turbo 190hp with dual clutch, and the Talisman is 100kg lighter 🙂
ruclips.net/video/v0qbwYgyApo/видео.htmlsi=sI3dqE9fAkRGeQcX
Am văzut alte masuratori cu Racelogic VBOX 8.3-8.6s 0-100. Cred ca pe asfalt uscat si cu traction off.
Cu siguranta! Eu zic ca se poate si 8.1, valoarea data de fabrica. Acceleratiile pe reprize sunt ok, cu tractiunea fata e mai dificil. N-a mai plouat p'aici de vreo luna si ceva, da` s-a gasit in dupa-masa cand am avut masina sa-i dea niste reprize... 😐 Oricum, pentru aproape 200cp pe 1.5 tone, rezultatele nu sunt sclipitoare, chiar de-ar fi conditii meteo excelente.
@@AcceleratingCars Poate aveai vânt frontal. Nu cred ca e mai inceata decat passat b8 2.0tdi 190cp dsg.
Ar fi interesant daca ai face 80-140 sau 100-150. Dar depinde si de directia vântului. Daca e frontal iti incetineste masina )
Testez in ambele sensuri de obicei, iar la momentul respectiv nu-mi amintesc sa fi batut vantul. O sa ma gandesc si la introducerea de masuratori noi, da, dar sa vedem...
@@Eugen-E e mai aproape de un 1.5TSI
@@dragospahontu Golful ușor pe 1.5TSI de 150 cai da. Passatul 1.5tsi e mai lent.
Странно 8.8с до 100...наверное бензин аи92 ... она стабильно едет 7.9...8.3с
I'm not 100% sure, but i think the car ran on 95 gasoline. But as i said in the video, the weather conditions were not the best, as it was a little bit wet. In dry conditions i'm sure the car can get better 0-100 time (i don't think 7.9 sec, but i think it might get close to 8.3 ).
@@AcceleratingCars ну как то несколько таких мерили... лучшее 7.9 на 100 бензине....худшее 8 3....
@@Avtor85 well, yeah, if you measured it...then it could be like this. 100 gasoline probably also helps 🙂
Where i can find the excel document?
Unfortunately nowhere for the moment, i haven't made it publicly available. But i will, shortly 😉
Which one is 100-150? Why wasn't it measured?
Hmm...i guess i started doing the 100-150 only after i tested this car 🤔
@@AcceleratingCarsok, wait 100-150 in future check acceleration
@@MsAndrei789 i checked the GPS recordings from my device and the closest to 100-150 i could get a 100-143 km/h (during the 1/4 mile run). So i found the next values: 100-110 is 1.5 sec, 100-120 is 3.1 sec, 100-130 is 5.2 sec, 100-140 is 7.5 sec and 100-143 is 8.25 sec. So seeing how time increases for every 10 km/h interval as speed gets higher, i would say 100-150 takes about 10 - 10.2 sec.
@@AcceleratingCarssuper !! Thank you, I also like to measure car acceleration using a telemetry device. my Octavia 1.4 140 hp goes 100-150 in 9.8 - 10 seconds, faster than this Mazda 200 hp 😂🫣
@@MsAndrei789 yeah, maybe just a bit faster, but i don't think you would really notice in real life. Your Octavia has to be considerably lighter than this Mazda.
Wet road? 😅
Yes. Slightly wet for the 0-100 test, as it was just starting to rain, and wet for the 1/4 mile.