The common example I hear in Psychology class is: if someone gets cuts in front of you while driving, you assume their just a jerk or a an idiot, but if you do it to someone else, you think about your external situation like how you’re late for work or how your loved one has been hospitalized.
The low and high of consistency are supposed to be the inverse of consensus and distinctiveness with regard to internal vs external attribution. It isn't low, low, low that indicates internal attribution, but rather low, low, high.
I enjoyed the video. Educational! there's an error though: you said when all three low- it's the personality. and all three high it's external events. That's incorrect. When consensus and distinctiveness are low but consistency high- then it's attributed to internal factors. And when consensus and distinctiveness are high but consistency is low- then it's attributed to external factors.
Wanna say thank you very much. Needed this. Our textbook is not great at explaining things. Plus I learn more visually, thanks so much! Your drawings really helped me.
I realized how I always caught myself thinking of my intentions whenever I do something out of the ordinary, but when I change my perspective to that of the people observing me, I knew I would’ve thought something completely different. Glad to understand more of this thought process in this video. Thanks for uploading!
I would like to add on a suggestion. Your presentation, the way things are drawn are pretty well. It overshadows what is being said. It grabs the attention of the listener and becomes the focus, whereas what you are saying is meant to he understood
At 5:05 , why would low consistency make me conclude that "That is just who they are"? I feel like if a person behaves consistently, then you would say that is who they are
Yes, i noticed that too. In consistency only the attribution should be different than the other too. I think it should be named as inconsistency factor, then it will be same in all three.
Consistency would be same action in same environment and distinctiveness would relate to the specific characteristic that is shown - in this case enjoys the finer things in life - does the person showcase that characteristic in different environments? I think this is the difference but I'm not sure I am currently learning
wait, so if the friends doesn't order an expensive wine frequently its personality? Not the sutuation? If it was the personality, would't he always do it? Still, great vid! :)
Thanks for this amazing explanation, I would ask about Rubicon model and theory of planned behavior, I need explanation about theme because I found hardly to understand
External factors are elements outside of a company that can affect its performance. These factors can be determined by a variety of factors, including: Social factors: These include consumer values, attitudes, beliefs, wants, desires, and market needs and preferences. Population demographics, such as age, gender, ethnicity, race, income, location, and education, are also considered social factors. Political factors: These include government policies, leadership, foreign trade policies, tax policy, regulation, and de-regulation trends. Technological factors: These include technological advances. Economic factors: These include the economic climate. Environmental factors: These include environmental factors. Competitive factors: These include competition. Global factors: These include major global events. A PESTEL analysis can be used to identify external factors that may affect a strategic plan. This analysis examines political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors. Market research can also be performed to gather data on market trends, customer preferences, and competitor activities.
The common example I hear in Psychology class is: if someone gets cuts in front of you while driving, you assume their just a jerk or a an idiot, but if you do it to someone else, you think about your external situation like how you’re late for work or how your loved one has been hospitalized.
Great example, perspective changes everything
We judge other people based on their action but we judge ourselves by our intentions
actor-observer bias?
The low and high of consistency are supposed to be the inverse of consensus and distinctiveness with regard to internal vs external attribution. It isn't low, low, low that indicates internal attribution, but rather low, low, high.
yeah I noticed he made an error
Thank you! I was like, that doesn't make any sense.
I enjoyed the video. Educational! there's an error though: you said when all three low- it's the personality. and all three high it's external events. That's incorrect. When consensus and distinctiveness are low but consistency high- then it's attributed to internal factors. And when consensus and distinctiveness are high but consistency is low- then it's attributed to external factors.
was just thinking this, thanks for pointing it out!
@@DrChristyC❤
Thank you, I thought that was the case. Believed i wasn’t understanding it correct.
Wanna say thank you very much. Needed this. Our textbook is not great at explaining things. Plus I learn more visually, thanks so much! Your drawings really helped me.
I realized how I always caught myself thinking of my intentions whenever I do something out of the ordinary, but when I change my perspective to that of the people observing me, I knew I would’ve thought something completely different. Glad to understand more of this thought process in this video. Thanks for uploading!
This is GREAT ! No rubbish background music just very good content well present Bravo : )
“Humans are meaning, making creatures” - The most used line by Practical Psychology
Why there's a comma?
@@cuz mating 👺
I love the way this channel, PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY explains the material; AND, I love the material ❗
If consistency is high, isn't it an internal attribution?
I would like to add on a suggestion. Your presentation, the way things are drawn are pretty well. It overshadows what is being said. It grabs the attention of the listener and becomes the focus, whereas what you are saying is meant to he understood
At 5:05 , why would low consistency make me conclude that "That is just who they are"? I feel like if a person behaves consistently, then you would say that is who they are
Yes, i noticed that too. In consistency only the attribution should be different than the other too. I think it should be named as inconsistency factor, then it will be same in all three.
I think the high and low consistency explanations were swapped, but otherwise great video!
Yes!
Overall a great video. Good job Sir.
Wow you explained it so well!! Thank you
So close to 2 mill subs dude, you’re smashing it 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
Thank you so.much now i understand attribution ❤
Which I could give the video more than one like. Thank you
Interesting information. Thank you for sharing
You deserve more views..
Awesome content as always. Keep making these highly educational videos. In fact I have a similar video in my channel, what a coincidence 😉.
This's the best method.
Thanks for ur explanation
Your videos are very helpful
Off topic... i miss the nice background music u used to use. The one you used in the self love videos.
I have a small doubt that distinctiveness and consistency look somewhat similar. Can anyone explain to me the difference in brief
Consistency would be same action in same environment and distinctiveness would relate to the specific characteristic that is shown - in this case enjoys the finer things in life - does the person showcase that characteristic in different environments?
I think this is the difference but I'm not sure I am currently learning
Think you could go into more detail on misattribution in another video?
Thank you very much!
what is the major attributes transmitted among the youth through social media?
wait, so if the friends doesn't order an expensive wine frequently its personality? Not the sutuation? If it was the personality, would't he always do it? Still, great vid! :)
Agreed.. I think they may have fumbled the details a bit..
Good one !
Thanks for this amazing explanation, I would ask about Rubicon model and theory of planned behavior, I need explanation about theme because I found hardly to understand
is situational the same as disounting?????
谢谢分享！
This technique of hand and drawing .... How can one make videos using this animation style?
I miss that background guitar music
External factors are elements outside of a company that can affect its performance. These factors can be determined by a variety of factors, including:
Social factors: These include consumer values, attitudes, beliefs, wants, desires, and market needs and preferences. Population demographics, such as age, gender, ethnicity, race, income, location, and education, are also considered social factors.
Political factors: These include government policies, leadership, foreign trade policies, tax policy, regulation, and de-regulation trends.
Technological factors: These include technological advances.
Economic factors: These include the economic climate.
Environmental factors: These include environmental factors.
Competitive factors: These include competition.
Global factors: These include major global events.
A PESTEL analysis can be used to identify external factors that may affect a strategic plan. This analysis examines political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors. Market research can also be performed to gather data on market trends, customer preferences, and competitor activities.
Can someone please explain the distinctiveness more to me?
Yes
Are you copying the course from Dr. Andrew, all your videos recently seem from his course
Girl 1: so brave 💙💙
Girl 2: punk
Me: bird person.
is this Primink? Is this what you been doing?
(Gestalt = /gesht-alt/ not /jesst-alt/)
The example in this video does not make sense.
hmm
Somewhere in here we can find the answers to racism
i dont like champagne
2nd😌
social
psychological
corporate
political
family
😎