Is One Way Speed of Light Problem For Special Relativity???
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 ноя 2023
- In these days the speed of light seems as a very precisely measured number. But every measurement done to this day was only able to measure a round trip rather than a one-way speed of light.
Although there is no reason to think the speed of light should differ depending on the direction there is also no reason to think it should be the same.
The question is: Is it a problem for special relativity due to its light postulate?
The channel @dialectphilosophy thinks that due to this fact we can restore an absolutness of space but what does it mean? Let's find out in this video :)
attributions:
www.freepik.com
www.vecteezy.com
for vector graphics
www.mixkit.co
for audio effects
Hey Lukas! Your videos continue to impress us - and we want to say it’s extremely refreshing to see someone on RUclips approach these sort of topics with a rigor and clarity of thought that doesn’t shy away from nuances. Plus, your love and enthusiasm for the topics at hand readily shines through, making your videos an enjoyable viewing experience, even when one may struggle to follow the math 🙃
I know you have to be polite to Dialect as a fellow youtuber... but let's be honest, he is like a flat earther. His videos have a "conspiracy theory" vibe - he seems to paint scientists as having malicious intentions and deliberately avoiding certain topics.
The main benefit of Dialect's view of things is that a variable anisotropy restores sanity to the concept of simultaneity. In my opinion, this is the critical benefit to using variable anisotropy factors. Yes, somebody has to declare a master reference frame (which could be anywhere). There are experiments that suggest there is perhaps such a frame associated with the cosmic microwave background radiation so maybe choose that but, yes, traditional special relativity is not overturned by these ideas and the fact the GPS works so well is the best proof that scientists and engineers understands how to agree on simultaneity, position, and the speed of light.
It always bothers me the "you're a flat earther" argument, that some people like to use against youtubers like dialect. Granted he could be wrong, and if I'm not mistaken, he isn't trying to debunk any well stablish scientific facts but rather try to find answers for the questions that we haven't agreed on.
First postulate: Laws of physics are the same in every INERTIAL frame of reference. Accelerated frames have different laws of motion depending on acceleration.
The speed of light depends on the amount of gravity in the vicinity. Everyone should already know this. The speed of light isn't constant since the measures of time and distance used to measure speed are not constant. In fact the changes in time and distance exaggerate the differences in the speed of light.
why is it impossible for light to be at a stand still ? Each time bring it up its like i just birthed a dinosaure the size of jupiter . IMPOSSIBLE . Ok why cant light just be cloning it self spherically once generated ? I think academia underestimated how far light without electromagnetic radiation can clone it self (for lack of better word from me)
L'Hopital was a French mathematician. His name is pronounced loh-pee-TAHL not L-Hospital. Bad mistake.
One problem to me is special relativity has no ability to describe interactions between objects that is moving close to speed of light or faster than speed of light such as those in the unobservable universe that is leaving us. But they should have the same physics and chemistry as us just we see them freeze in our telescopes. They are not freeze to a observer in between and we can see the middle man moving with responses to those freezing universe.
Ha.. light is not IN a frame of reference
You can see the beam as it moves away dont mess up or else... ill do it...
I was waiting for your reaction to the last dialect video and here it is!! Thanks :)
Thank you for making these videos! I appreciate them a lot.
I view the anisotropy of c the
Special Relativity is a simple theory of hyperbolic perspective which is also true, and it is amazing that anyone should have any difficulty with it. If we meet a challenge to this theory, then try converting it to a challenge to the theory of elliptical perspective. The Earth is really shaped liked a rugby ball, but our rulers shrink or expand as we rotate them to create the illusion that it is round. Herdthink geographers are conspiring to cover this up.
Videos from the other channel are basically dedicated at proving there is an aether. The funny thing is that Einstein himself was NOT against the aether. He actually argued that there is a natural equivalent to the aether in the General Relativity which is the background metric (ignoring local massive objects) generated by all the masses in the Universe.
I skipped Veritasium video, as I preferred a less click bait approach, thanks! Good presentation
Why not take two synchronised clocks next to each other, and move them BOTH in opposite directions to a predetermined distance. They should remain synchronised, and thus able to measure a true c
You can tell that light travels at the same speed in all directions by observing something like the Cherenkov radiation in water cooled nuclear reactors.
I have thoroughly enjoyed the debate between you and Dialect. Irrespective of who's right, you guys elevate this debate to a higher level.