Видео

Wow extremely elegant

Interesting emerging behavior! How do you identify the various particles as a baryon, an anti-baryon, quarks and mesons?

none of the rockets accelerate, we redefine one of the rockets by removing the yeeted particles from the definition of it's com position. if we keep considering it as a whole with those particles, it's merely changing its shape. then we can calculate the time difference between this inert but lopsided rocket and its particleless main part relative to each other. there. we have our acceleration nonabsolute. now kiss and make up.

Torsion Osscilation bands

Has this Chanel a tiktok account? I need download this short

Is it possible for me to play with that simulation?

When you talk about aether you clearly do not understand what it is from a modern point of view. It is not "luminiferous", it is not "fluid" in the sense we think of fluids, you can not use it as a reference frame: how could you if you know what a reference frame is, therefore you can not calculate velocities (and hence accelerations, energies, momenta etc) relative to it. It is not "something else" that we should be able to "see": !! how so since it is the thing that let us "see". It does not "interact" with matter but again because it is not "something else". Around 1905 Einstein thought that light is made of particles and that those particles were traveling at an invariant speed, when you talk about light you seem to imply that it is (at least also) a wave.

If we think of particles like this, couldn't this explain spin, since the angular momentum comes from the twisting of the field of sorts?

Do you have any plans to publish an interactable on this pendula on strings simulation? Looks useful for learning how waves work and generally fun to play around with

Do you think you it can work in 3d? I can help you make gpu code if you wanna play with this idea

Quarks without color charge!? Yoooooooooooooo 🤯 P.S. this is meson scattering and rearrangement. Baryons have three quarks 😉

"In May and November, the Earth is moving at "right angles" to the line to Algol. During this time we see minima happening regularly at their 2.867321 day intervals. However, during August, the Earth is rapidly moving towards Algol at about 107,229 km/hr as explained on my How Fast Are We Moving? page. (The Earth moves approximately 202 times its own size in one day.) So in 2.867321 days the Earth moves about 7,379,039 km closer to Algol. _But the varying light from Algol doesn't know this - its light waves left Algol 93 years ago and are travelling at a constant speed._ The result - we "catch a bunch of minima early" during August as shown on Chart 2. Exactly the opposite happens during February - the Earth is moving away from Algol that fast and it takes longer for the group of minima to reach us so we see them taking longer between events. How long? 7,379,039 km divided by the speed of light 299,792.458 km/sec is 24.61382 seconds. So in May and November when we are not moving towards or away from Algol - the period seems constant. It is our rapid movement towards or away from the events in August and February that causes the timing differences." I assume that light is passing the earth at c when the earth isn't moving towards or away from Algol. In February the earth is moving away from Algol and the time between the eclipses is 2.8675875347 days and the light is passing the earth at 186,265 mi/sec. In May and November the earth is not moving towards or away from Algol and the time between eclipses is 2.867321 days and the light is passing the earth at 186,282 mi/sec. In August the earth is moving towards Algol and the time between eclipses is 2.8670608912 days and the light is passing the earth at 186,299 mi/sec.

You just become my favourite person 🤓👍🏻

0:20 - "this defect is called..." -- couldn't understand what you said after this. Suggest you show such terms on the screen at the same time.

And it's also a quantum wave. With packets. Moving locally. But the wave moving the whole time.

What if you put it in water?

This is astounding. Thank you for this intuition.

Does a photon exist as a particle before it is detected ?.

You have to check out Larry Reed's "Quantum Wave Mechanics" papers. Particularly his paper "Confinement of Light: Standing Wave Transformations in a Phase-Locked Resonator". His work builds on that of Jennison and Drinkwater et al., who studied the electromagnetic momentum contribution of resonant cavities under accelerated reference frames. Reed suggests that the non-linear relativistic wave transformations of cavity resonators can generate mass generation in electromagnetic standing waves undergoing higher order accelerations. Reed's paper models the wave transformation called the Lorentz-Doppler shift, and computes the inverse function which models the time-symmetric process of the wave transform, it has what are called conjugate phase angle and conjugate momentum vector. This models what an object in motion would look like going backwards in spacetime the way it came from, including the relativistic effects of time-dilation and length-contraction. Reed goes on to describe the graviton as two phase conjugate photons in a coupled pendulum-like system, harmonic oscillators like atoms for example, will spontaneously phase conjugate photons, which will store the phase and momentum information holographically on the surfaces of interacting harmonic oscillators. This creates an energy density gradient between atoms and the surfaces experience the relativistic wave transformation converting the hidden electromagnetic momentum into kinetic energy which follows the same inverse square law as gravity. Time dilation and length contraction become analogous to the phenomena of spontaneous clock synchronization in coupled mechanical systems like pendula. The really incredible thing Reed suggests, and I am hopeful but skeptical about, is that the inverse Lorentz-Doppler shift can be used to create much more powerful types of tractor beams or optical tweezers. Normal laser tractor beams have a power limit before they vaporize an object of interest, and so the size of the objects it can lift is fairly small. But Reed's technique involves phase conjugate mirrors and a pumped resonant cavity to create powerful repulsive forces by annihilating photons into phonons on the surfaces of objects and inside the resonant cavity emitting the conjugated EM field. This photon-phonon pressure is a resonant process that bounces phase conjugated photons back and forth millions or billions of times, as the Q factor of the resonant cavity is very high. A small amount of electromagnetic energy would be enough to lift the phase conjugate mirror against Earth's gravity. The confinement of light by phase conjugation, and red-shifting or blue-shifting the resulting 'dark soliton' with the inverse Lorentz-Doppler shift is the key difference between this and a photon rocket, which simply emit photons and absorb the momentum of the emitted photon once. This phase conjugate propulsion technology would be a reaction engine, pointed at the Earth to create the equal and opposite force on the mirror that's produced on the ground plane.

Thank you for the lay version of this complex topic. Blew me away!

It is a well put together video.

Special relativity was wrong, general relativity even more wrong...

very very very interesting.

Maybe. SR is only true locally and in week gravity.

why the hell you need to keep showing your distracting talking head with hand waving. ... That's fucking annoying and ruins the whole video... meh

This sounds like something we could just test for in the future if we develop instruments that allow for precise measurements. But I really like this idea of radiation horizon. Does that mean every particle creates infinite energy but it’s just separated by an eventhorizon? Could this be a contender for dark energy?

I like his videos a lot, but I was thinking the same about his argument against absolut acceleration. Acceleration can’t be completely relative because of inertia. If the frame of reference for acceleration didn’t matter at all that would mean the rocket engines could move the entire universe. But that doesn’t make sense because it would take way more energy to move a planet let alone the entire universe compared to moving a space ship.

Pretty rad and that sinus looks like a carrier wave. What are we calling packets or quasi particles in nervous systems? The term in neurobiology is usually action potential. We know interference occurs in nerves but the model must include surface propagation which likens through a refractory period to pendulae but also core or cytosolic waves amplified by microtubules.

Your explanation is the best I’ve heard, which means I feel I understand most of it. Can you do a follow up video on protons/quarks and the strong cp problem??? I haven’t seen an explanation I can understand. Why is it a huge problem? What is it? How do we know it exists? What would physicists like to see instead? Is there any hope to solve it? How does it play into the baryon asymmetry? Is it a worse problem than the baryon asymmetry? Is it the same thing? How does it stack up to other mysteries like the horizon problem and initial entropy state and a universe from nothing? Is it a part of these problems??? As you can see, i understand nothing about it, why it’s an issue or what it affects!!!! HELP!!!! THANK YOU.

nice clickbait way to say "I can confirm special relativity by making features of simulated pendula obvious"

seeing your progress over the years is so inspiring!

9:12 Is the phonon solution actually massless with a speed independent of wavelength? Shouldn't it have a mass corresponding to the frequency of an isolated pendulum?

If the initial conditions include a kink with a wavelength shorter than a static kink, the kink will propagate with some velocity. How do things evolve if there's a kink with a wavelength *longer* than a standard kink?

This one was awesome! Thanks so much. We have to look at the 3D model!!!

How might one construct a similar model where general relativity falls out? I wonder if that is possible. If you can get special relativity, can you get general relativity?

Take relativity theory and shove it Earth’s axial rotation alters the observer visual observations from a circular motion visual line-of-sight = (2 π) to a sinusoidal wave motion visual line-of-sight = (7.640395578). Enlightened, Classical, Imperial, Prestigious, Modern, and Nobel Astronomers and Physicists accounted for the observer’s circular motion = Earth’s axial rotation (circle 2 π) & missed the observer’s fixed scopes circular motion line-of-sight altered by Earth’s rotation to a wave visual line-of-sight (wave 7.640395578). The observational data processing errors = solar system data and all published, peer-reviewed, enlightened, classical, Imperial, modern, prestigious, and Nobel astronomy = Earth’s axial rotation altered visual effects errors. The Inverse data processing errors of Earth’s axial rotation altered visual effects errors = Atom + all published, peer-reviewed, enlightened, classical, imperial, modern, prestigious and Nobel Physics. Five centuries of Astronomy and Physics written by individuals with power association, successfully indoctrinated and domesticated the masses, controls sciences and sciences funding, called prestigious scientists, debunked not has been and never was, are battles of the universe lecture subjects. Textbooks shredded, Nobel beheaded, and PHD’s are born again GED’s. There is no solar system. The solar system = observer’s altered visual effects errors. Copernicus made the error, Newton wrote the error = Universal gravity and Einstein claimed the error = relativistic physics. Humanity needs & wants solutions. Humanity has 5 million PhD’s with collective scientific value of 1 dollar in food stamps and my lotto said not a winner. Otherwise, I can and will dig Alfred Nobel Institutions & winner graves; sweep the scum of Nobel not has been and never was. Einstein’s relativistic physics = observational error = solar system error = produced by any physics using any level mathematics including 5th grade arithmetic

We can see effects like length contraction relative to an observer who is stationary wrt the springs. But would two moving particles in this model also see each other correctly length contracted?

Until chromodynamics is given the same attention instead of being hidden under the carpet by everyone 😂

This just proves relativity is a gimmick. It's just a natural consequence of mathematical wave theory. Modern physics is controlled by lawyers, not scientists.

Really great video! There is one thing that I don't understand and that is the bounce state you discussed. You say that the energy cannot escape to infinity. But is the bounce state not just something that can only exist in a harmonic oscillator that is confined in space by the boundary conditions? Or is the confinement also the result of a relativistic effect?

you can even see it if you squint, a counter rotated gyroscopic loading that is maintained between particles created together or interacted in a certain way, maintained at distance through a coupling through the vacuum structure between particles because macroscopic precession of a single uncoupled gyro is not minimizing some quantity related to the change in polerization of the angular momentum in the part of the structure responsible for the potentials eminating from charges, if the structure is not disrupted, it can be maintained at a great distance and responds to changes in orientation faster than light, due to its driven nature, even though the interaction conserves energy in one description it is spending it in a different description. so particles have a similar kind of thing going on, just that it can co rotate or counterrotate just the same.

and btw the friction deleting thing with a symmetry like energy conservation emerging independently in the dynamics, different from the energy conservation already present, or even if energy is not conserved, like with well behaved dissipative terms, the energy lost in the "invisible dissipation" increases in entropy and the entropy gradient even if it doesnt serve as an energy source for the dynamics on average it does break roughly even in the coordinates where the dissipation is not accounted for instead intepreting the effects as being in an expanding space, but that flow of energy means things like time crystals, and rich structure that is quasi stable is possible in the vacuum, that would not be possible with just some variant of a kinetic gas or a solid or something they might have imagines in 1870. the properties of a vacuum structure like this has material properties that are very different than elastic mechanical forces or fluid flow or something like that, it can be much richer and can completely avoid friction, have very high propagation velocities with a structure that is effectively a superfluid intrinsically, forces are propagated by stresses that result in a driven system, with similar effective interactions in its own constituate structure, there is no sense in which the effective interactions making up material properties is more fundamental or the material stuff, its just coemergent in a sense from structure on smaller and smaller scale, and the effective interactions and the forms of structure are just equally real aspects of the over all pattern of and motion relations, it is basically my only guess for why there are forces at a distance, there is a system that is losing energy over time, and the flow of that energy does all sorts of fancy stuff as it increases in entropy, as long as the expense is proportional between different processes in different places, and is in a sort of equilibrium that decays over time, and the dynamics result in some form of intrinsic energy conservation, where the processes are driven and dissipative but over all creates symmetries in the dynamics that look like energy conservation, then you can have something that looks like harry potter magic in what apears to be empty space without some mysterious incomprehensible elastic material or something weird like that. for example there could be time crystals in such a thing, but if you only knew about the conservation law ignoring the dissipation, then that would seem kind of silly that you can have a stable time crystal, which would be a perpetual motion machine, ofc a superconductor to some degree behaves like that as well, but anyway, it would be possible to have stable long range structure very different from materials we know and love like a fluid or a solid, or a gass, not only could there be all sorts of waves propagating in it, but it could have the transmission properties of a solid for mechanical waves and still be like a superfluid, it could have long range forces between things with hysteresis effects, where depending on past interaction and motion, two partcles can be coupled in many ways, including haveing a connection between the orientations of their spins, and so on, having such an effect to drive long range interactions means it is maybe possible to build a complete hidden variable theory for quantum mechanics. anyway this kind of effect or vacuum dynamics is the most important ingredient that is new if i was to try to revive the ether project. but if one wants to do that, ofc it is a difficult problem and now you have to derive every known effect from it at the very least and probably some more, plus hopefull some untested predictions of quantum mechanics that are not correct. it is funny that the most obvious way to impliment an idea like that, has the generic consequence of looking like an expanding spacetime, from just basic considerations of the dynamics of rescaling and friction that has a symmetric character that is essentially unobservable intrisically.

Are galaxies affected by special relativity (SR)? Space is expanding, and at the Hubble Sphere, at the speed of light. Are galaxies at the Hubble Sphere distance to us observers affected by SR? Are they frozen in time (to us)?

An eleptic byke IS quantum . Cause the stroke motion of the arm can output both direction of the weel 😮

This is a much prettier unifying idea than anything in String Theory.

Yeah, but it travels WHERE? or through WHAT? What media? Say, photon.

The way that it looks is beautiful, can you do more animations of different physics represented..???!!!! Plzplz I could watch forever..this is literally the coolest thing ever

You are the next Einstein this has SO MUCH POTENTIAL.. you've discovered something amazing my friend.. I hope u know that

Dude.. this is the most amazing thing I've ever watched. Mind. Blown

Please continue in this direction.